Can Yew Wands be used as a focus for both druids and wizards?











up vote
29
down vote

favorite
1












As I was developing a level 4 character for a 5th edition D&D campaign I was playing with my friends, I settled on a multi-class character using the Druid and Wizard classes. When I went to choose a focus for the character, I saw the "yew wand" in the druid focus list and the "wand" in the wizard focus list. Could the yew wand then be used as a focus for both classes?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Pik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    Welcome to RPG.se! Please take the tour when you get a quick minute to learn more about us. I hope to see you around!
    – Rubiksmoose
    Nov 28 at 18:10










  • Possible duplicate of Can a multi-class spellcaster have one thing be two different focuses?
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago






  • 1




    What can yew do...
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @V2Blast not necessarily, because this doesn't necessarily have 2 types of foci. The question is more of "is the yew wand for a druidic focus the same kind of wand as a wizard focus".
    – Riker
    2 days ago















up vote
29
down vote

favorite
1












As I was developing a level 4 character for a 5th edition D&D campaign I was playing with my friends, I settled on a multi-class character using the Druid and Wizard classes. When I went to choose a focus for the character, I saw the "yew wand" in the druid focus list and the "wand" in the wizard focus list. Could the yew wand then be used as a focus for both classes?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Pik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    Welcome to RPG.se! Please take the tour when you get a quick minute to learn more about us. I hope to see you around!
    – Rubiksmoose
    Nov 28 at 18:10










  • Possible duplicate of Can a multi-class spellcaster have one thing be two different focuses?
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago






  • 1




    What can yew do...
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @V2Blast not necessarily, because this doesn't necessarily have 2 types of foci. The question is more of "is the yew wand for a druidic focus the same kind of wand as a wizard focus".
    – Riker
    2 days ago













up vote
29
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
29
down vote

favorite
1






1





As I was developing a level 4 character for a 5th edition D&D campaign I was playing with my friends, I settled on a multi-class character using the Druid and Wizard classes. When I went to choose a focus for the character, I saw the "yew wand" in the druid focus list and the "wand" in the wizard focus list. Could the yew wand then be used as a focus for both classes?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Pik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











As I was developing a level 4 character for a 5th edition D&D campaign I was playing with my friends, I settled on a multi-class character using the Druid and Wizard classes. When I went to choose a focus for the character, I saw the "yew wand" in the druid focus list and the "wand" in the wizard focus list. Could the yew wand then be used as a focus for both classes?







dnd-5e wizard druid arcane-focus






share|improve this question









New contributor




Pik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Pik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 28 at 18:08









Rubiksmoose

44.6k6224340




44.6k6224340






New contributor




Pik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 28 at 18:06









Pik

14613




14613




New contributor




Pik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Pik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Pik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    Welcome to RPG.se! Please take the tour when you get a quick minute to learn more about us. I hope to see you around!
    – Rubiksmoose
    Nov 28 at 18:10










  • Possible duplicate of Can a multi-class spellcaster have one thing be two different focuses?
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago






  • 1




    What can yew do...
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @V2Blast not necessarily, because this doesn't necessarily have 2 types of foci. The question is more of "is the yew wand for a druidic focus the same kind of wand as a wizard focus".
    – Riker
    2 days ago














  • 1




    Welcome to RPG.se! Please take the tour when you get a quick minute to learn more about us. I hope to see you around!
    – Rubiksmoose
    Nov 28 at 18:10










  • Possible duplicate of Can a multi-class spellcaster have one thing be two different focuses?
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago






  • 1




    What can yew do...
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @V2Blast not necessarily, because this doesn't necessarily have 2 types of foci. The question is more of "is the yew wand for a druidic focus the same kind of wand as a wizard focus".
    – Riker
    2 days ago








1




1




Welcome to RPG.se! Please take the tour when you get a quick minute to learn more about us. I hope to see you around!
– Rubiksmoose
Nov 28 at 18:10




Welcome to RPG.se! Please take the tour when you get a quick minute to learn more about us. I hope to see you around!
– Rubiksmoose
Nov 28 at 18:10












Possible duplicate of Can a multi-class spellcaster have one thing be two different focuses?
– V2Blast
2 days ago




Possible duplicate of Can a multi-class spellcaster have one thing be two different focuses?
– V2Blast
2 days ago




1




1




What can yew do...
– V2Blast
2 days ago




What can yew do...
– V2Blast
2 days ago




1




1




@V2Blast not necessarily, because this doesn't necessarily have 2 types of foci. The question is more of "is the yew wand for a druidic focus the same kind of wand as a wizard focus".
– Riker
2 days ago




@V2Blast not necessarily, because this doesn't necessarily have 2 types of foci. The question is more of "is the yew wand for a druidic focus the same kind of wand as a wizard focus".
– Riker
2 days ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
37
down vote













You might say something like: "Oh, well, a wizard can use a wand to cast spells, and a druid's yew wand is a wand, so the wizard can use that."



But a wizard's arcane focus isn't just any old wand. A wizard's arcane focus is an item which was specifically created to be an arcane focus. If the druid's yew wand wasn't specifically created to be an arcane focus, we should expect it not to work for a wizard.



Here's the full rules text:




Arcane Focus. An arcane focus is a special item— an orb, a crystal, a rod, a specially constructed staff, a wand-­‐‑like length of wood, or some similar item— designed to channel the power of arcane spells. A sorcerer, warlock, or wizard can use such an item as a spellcasting focus.



Druidic Focus. A druidic focus might be a sprig of mistletoe or holly, a wand or scepter made of yew or another special wood, a staff drawn whole out of a living tree, or a totem object incorporating feathers, fur, bones, and teeth from sacred animals. A druid can use such an object as a spellcasting focus.




So: a super-literal reading of the rules would tell us that a wizard probably can't use a "druid's yew wand" as a focus, because the "druid's yew wand" wasn't "designed to channel the power of arcane spells".



But, if a wizard gets a piece of yew wood and runs it through the process of creating a wizard wand, the result will be a "wand made of yew wood" and a druid can use that just fine.





This is still a bit ambiguous. Xirema notes that the rules for multiclassing tell you that you can only use a focus for spells of the appropriate class, which seems to imply that the designers might have intended for foci to be separate.



Another relevant consideration is that multiclassing tends to result in worse classes than single characters anyway. If we were making this ruling based on game balance, we should probably try to be lenient to the multiclass character, since they're going to have a harder time compared to single classes.



But the gripping hand is that we on stackexchange can still be overruled by your DM. If any rules are ever unclear or ambiguous (and these rules are), the way to resolve them is to ask your DM to make a ruling.



Go ask your DM to make a ruling. : )






share|improve this answer























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – mxyzplk
    yesterday


















up vote
7
down vote













Yes.



Because a yew wand is a wand, a Yew Wand would be valid for both Druids and Wizards, so your character could use it for both their Wizard and their Druid spells.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Rules as Written, no.



    As written, an arcane focus is an arcane focus, and a druidic focus is a druidic focus. Everything else is just suggestions for descriptive text of what a specific focus might look like.



    Rules as Fun, sure!



    It totally makes sense for a cross-class character to double up their foci in a way that meets both requirements, so sure, go for it! (Pending DM permission, of course.) The only real, serious difference would be a matter of a few gold -- which is really no big deal for an adventurer of even 2nd level -- and potentially a question of how many hands you're using at any given time.



    I don't think the 'number of hands' issue is worth worrying about unless the DM really likes to get fiddly about things like that. Consider the following complaint:



    "Wait a minute, you're holding a torch in one hand and your arcane wand in the other, and you used your free object-interaction to put your wand away, so if you want to pull out your druidic focus you're going to have to use an action!"



    If your DM might say something like that, then you may have an issue with 'doubling up' like that, as it would remove something your DM is treating as a limiting factor on your spellcasting. If your DM wouldn't say that, then sure, there's very likely no problem with a dual-use wand.






    share|improve this answer






























      up vote
      -1
      down vote













      You need two wands; the same wand cannot serve both classes



      From the Multiclassing rules, as written in the Player's Handbook, page 163:




      Spells Known and Prepared. You determine what spells you know and can prepare for each class individually...



      [...]



      ... Similarly, a spellcasting focus, such as a holy symbol, can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus.




      While a Yew Wand is almost certainly valid as a spellcasting focus for either a Druid or a Wizard, it's not valid for both at the same time. You'd need to acquire a second wand at the time you multiclass.



      If focuses were permitted to be shared between multiple classes, the wording would read something like "can be used only for the spells from the classes associated with that focus"






      share|improve this answer



















      • 5




        Why can't the focus be associated to more than one class?
        – NautArch
        Nov 28 at 19:47






      • 6




        I don't see that interpretation as valid. Each class checks validity independently. Is it a Wand? Works for Wizard. Is it a Yew Want? Works for Druid. Same wand? Irrelevant. One wand can work fine for both. There is nothing in what you cited to support your assertion.
        – MarkTO
        Nov 28 at 19:50






      • 6




        I'm just not seeing the same thing you are. The quote says a focus can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus - but it's not saying that the focus can't associate to two classes and it doesn't say it can only do one. Unless I'm missing something.
        – NautArch
        Nov 28 at 20:08






      • 6




        This logic would imply that you could not use the same holy symbol for paladin and priest levels of the same faith. That seems... obviously incorrect.
        – Ben Barden
        Nov 28 at 20:51






      • 2




        @BenBarden Strictly speaking, in 5th edition, Paladins don't draw their power from the same source that Clerics do; Clerics draw their power from their Divine Connection, Paladins draw from their own Willpower and Convictions.
        – Xirema
        Nov 28 at 20:57













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Pik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136432%2fcan-yew-wands-be-used-as-a-focus-for-both-druids-and-wizards%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      37
      down vote













      You might say something like: "Oh, well, a wizard can use a wand to cast spells, and a druid's yew wand is a wand, so the wizard can use that."



      But a wizard's arcane focus isn't just any old wand. A wizard's arcane focus is an item which was specifically created to be an arcane focus. If the druid's yew wand wasn't specifically created to be an arcane focus, we should expect it not to work for a wizard.



      Here's the full rules text:




      Arcane Focus. An arcane focus is a special item— an orb, a crystal, a rod, a specially constructed staff, a wand-­‐‑like length of wood, or some similar item— designed to channel the power of arcane spells. A sorcerer, warlock, or wizard can use such an item as a spellcasting focus.



      Druidic Focus. A druidic focus might be a sprig of mistletoe or holly, a wand or scepter made of yew or another special wood, a staff drawn whole out of a living tree, or a totem object incorporating feathers, fur, bones, and teeth from sacred animals. A druid can use such an object as a spellcasting focus.




      So: a super-literal reading of the rules would tell us that a wizard probably can't use a "druid's yew wand" as a focus, because the "druid's yew wand" wasn't "designed to channel the power of arcane spells".



      But, if a wizard gets a piece of yew wood and runs it through the process of creating a wizard wand, the result will be a "wand made of yew wood" and a druid can use that just fine.





      This is still a bit ambiguous. Xirema notes that the rules for multiclassing tell you that you can only use a focus for spells of the appropriate class, which seems to imply that the designers might have intended for foci to be separate.



      Another relevant consideration is that multiclassing tends to result in worse classes than single characters anyway. If we were making this ruling based on game balance, we should probably try to be lenient to the multiclass character, since they're going to have a harder time compared to single classes.



      But the gripping hand is that we on stackexchange can still be overruled by your DM. If any rules are ever unclear or ambiguous (and these rules are), the way to resolve them is to ask your DM to make a ruling.



      Go ask your DM to make a ruling. : )






      share|improve this answer























      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
        – mxyzplk
        yesterday















      up vote
      37
      down vote













      You might say something like: "Oh, well, a wizard can use a wand to cast spells, and a druid's yew wand is a wand, so the wizard can use that."



      But a wizard's arcane focus isn't just any old wand. A wizard's arcane focus is an item which was specifically created to be an arcane focus. If the druid's yew wand wasn't specifically created to be an arcane focus, we should expect it not to work for a wizard.



      Here's the full rules text:




      Arcane Focus. An arcane focus is a special item— an orb, a crystal, a rod, a specially constructed staff, a wand-­‐‑like length of wood, or some similar item— designed to channel the power of arcane spells. A sorcerer, warlock, or wizard can use such an item as a spellcasting focus.



      Druidic Focus. A druidic focus might be a sprig of mistletoe or holly, a wand or scepter made of yew or another special wood, a staff drawn whole out of a living tree, or a totem object incorporating feathers, fur, bones, and teeth from sacred animals. A druid can use such an object as a spellcasting focus.




      So: a super-literal reading of the rules would tell us that a wizard probably can't use a "druid's yew wand" as a focus, because the "druid's yew wand" wasn't "designed to channel the power of arcane spells".



      But, if a wizard gets a piece of yew wood and runs it through the process of creating a wizard wand, the result will be a "wand made of yew wood" and a druid can use that just fine.





      This is still a bit ambiguous. Xirema notes that the rules for multiclassing tell you that you can only use a focus for spells of the appropriate class, which seems to imply that the designers might have intended for foci to be separate.



      Another relevant consideration is that multiclassing tends to result in worse classes than single characters anyway. If we were making this ruling based on game balance, we should probably try to be lenient to the multiclass character, since they're going to have a harder time compared to single classes.



      But the gripping hand is that we on stackexchange can still be overruled by your DM. If any rules are ever unclear or ambiguous (and these rules are), the way to resolve them is to ask your DM to make a ruling.



      Go ask your DM to make a ruling. : )






      share|improve this answer























      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
        – mxyzplk
        yesterday













      up vote
      37
      down vote










      up vote
      37
      down vote









      You might say something like: "Oh, well, a wizard can use a wand to cast spells, and a druid's yew wand is a wand, so the wizard can use that."



      But a wizard's arcane focus isn't just any old wand. A wizard's arcane focus is an item which was specifically created to be an arcane focus. If the druid's yew wand wasn't specifically created to be an arcane focus, we should expect it not to work for a wizard.



      Here's the full rules text:




      Arcane Focus. An arcane focus is a special item— an orb, a crystal, a rod, a specially constructed staff, a wand-­‐‑like length of wood, or some similar item— designed to channel the power of arcane spells. A sorcerer, warlock, or wizard can use such an item as a spellcasting focus.



      Druidic Focus. A druidic focus might be a sprig of mistletoe or holly, a wand or scepter made of yew or another special wood, a staff drawn whole out of a living tree, or a totem object incorporating feathers, fur, bones, and teeth from sacred animals. A druid can use such an object as a spellcasting focus.




      So: a super-literal reading of the rules would tell us that a wizard probably can't use a "druid's yew wand" as a focus, because the "druid's yew wand" wasn't "designed to channel the power of arcane spells".



      But, if a wizard gets a piece of yew wood and runs it through the process of creating a wizard wand, the result will be a "wand made of yew wood" and a druid can use that just fine.





      This is still a bit ambiguous. Xirema notes that the rules for multiclassing tell you that you can only use a focus for spells of the appropriate class, which seems to imply that the designers might have intended for foci to be separate.



      Another relevant consideration is that multiclassing tends to result in worse classes than single characters anyway. If we were making this ruling based on game balance, we should probably try to be lenient to the multiclass character, since they're going to have a harder time compared to single classes.



      But the gripping hand is that we on stackexchange can still be overruled by your DM. If any rules are ever unclear or ambiguous (and these rules are), the way to resolve them is to ask your DM to make a ruling.



      Go ask your DM to make a ruling. : )






      share|improve this answer














      You might say something like: "Oh, well, a wizard can use a wand to cast spells, and a druid's yew wand is a wand, so the wizard can use that."



      But a wizard's arcane focus isn't just any old wand. A wizard's arcane focus is an item which was specifically created to be an arcane focus. If the druid's yew wand wasn't specifically created to be an arcane focus, we should expect it not to work for a wizard.



      Here's the full rules text:




      Arcane Focus. An arcane focus is a special item— an orb, a crystal, a rod, a specially constructed staff, a wand-­‐‑like length of wood, or some similar item— designed to channel the power of arcane spells. A sorcerer, warlock, or wizard can use such an item as a spellcasting focus.



      Druidic Focus. A druidic focus might be a sprig of mistletoe or holly, a wand or scepter made of yew or another special wood, a staff drawn whole out of a living tree, or a totem object incorporating feathers, fur, bones, and teeth from sacred animals. A druid can use such an object as a spellcasting focus.




      So: a super-literal reading of the rules would tell us that a wizard probably can't use a "druid's yew wand" as a focus, because the "druid's yew wand" wasn't "designed to channel the power of arcane spells".



      But, if a wizard gets a piece of yew wood and runs it through the process of creating a wizard wand, the result will be a "wand made of yew wood" and a druid can use that just fine.





      This is still a bit ambiguous. Xirema notes that the rules for multiclassing tell you that you can only use a focus for spells of the appropriate class, which seems to imply that the designers might have intended for foci to be separate.



      Another relevant consideration is that multiclassing tends to result in worse classes than single characters anyway. If we were making this ruling based on game balance, we should probably try to be lenient to the multiclass character, since they're going to have a harder time compared to single classes.



      But the gripping hand is that we on stackexchange can still be overruled by your DM. If any rules are ever unclear or ambiguous (and these rules are), the way to resolve them is to ask your DM to make a ruling.



      Go ask your DM to make a ruling. : )







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 29 at 3:25

























      answered Nov 28 at 18:44









      Dan B

      34.9k764136




      34.9k764136












      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
        – mxyzplk
        yesterday


















      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
        – mxyzplk
        yesterday
















      Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
      – mxyzplk
      yesterday




      Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
      – mxyzplk
      yesterday












      up vote
      7
      down vote













      Yes.



      Because a yew wand is a wand, a Yew Wand would be valid for both Druids and Wizards, so your character could use it for both their Wizard and their Druid spells.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        7
        down vote













        Yes.



        Because a yew wand is a wand, a Yew Wand would be valid for both Druids and Wizards, so your character could use it for both their Wizard and their Druid spells.






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          7
          down vote










          up vote
          7
          down vote









          Yes.



          Because a yew wand is a wand, a Yew Wand would be valid for both Druids and Wizards, so your character could use it for both their Wizard and their Druid spells.






          share|improve this answer












          Yes.



          Because a yew wand is a wand, a Yew Wand would be valid for both Druids and Wizards, so your character could use it for both their Wizard and their Druid spells.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 28 at 18:24









          MarkTO

          1,389117




          1,389117






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Rules as Written, no.



              As written, an arcane focus is an arcane focus, and a druidic focus is a druidic focus. Everything else is just suggestions for descriptive text of what a specific focus might look like.



              Rules as Fun, sure!



              It totally makes sense for a cross-class character to double up their foci in a way that meets both requirements, so sure, go for it! (Pending DM permission, of course.) The only real, serious difference would be a matter of a few gold -- which is really no big deal for an adventurer of even 2nd level -- and potentially a question of how many hands you're using at any given time.



              I don't think the 'number of hands' issue is worth worrying about unless the DM really likes to get fiddly about things like that. Consider the following complaint:



              "Wait a minute, you're holding a torch in one hand and your arcane wand in the other, and you used your free object-interaction to put your wand away, so if you want to pull out your druidic focus you're going to have to use an action!"



              If your DM might say something like that, then you may have an issue with 'doubling up' like that, as it would remove something your DM is treating as a limiting factor on your spellcasting. If your DM wouldn't say that, then sure, there's very likely no problem with a dual-use wand.






              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Rules as Written, no.



                As written, an arcane focus is an arcane focus, and a druidic focus is a druidic focus. Everything else is just suggestions for descriptive text of what a specific focus might look like.



                Rules as Fun, sure!



                It totally makes sense for a cross-class character to double up their foci in a way that meets both requirements, so sure, go for it! (Pending DM permission, of course.) The only real, serious difference would be a matter of a few gold -- which is really no big deal for an adventurer of even 2nd level -- and potentially a question of how many hands you're using at any given time.



                I don't think the 'number of hands' issue is worth worrying about unless the DM really likes to get fiddly about things like that. Consider the following complaint:



                "Wait a minute, you're holding a torch in one hand and your arcane wand in the other, and you used your free object-interaction to put your wand away, so if you want to pull out your druidic focus you're going to have to use an action!"



                If your DM might say something like that, then you may have an issue with 'doubling up' like that, as it would remove something your DM is treating as a limiting factor on your spellcasting. If your DM wouldn't say that, then sure, there's very likely no problem with a dual-use wand.






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Rules as Written, no.



                  As written, an arcane focus is an arcane focus, and a druidic focus is a druidic focus. Everything else is just suggestions for descriptive text of what a specific focus might look like.



                  Rules as Fun, sure!



                  It totally makes sense for a cross-class character to double up their foci in a way that meets both requirements, so sure, go for it! (Pending DM permission, of course.) The only real, serious difference would be a matter of a few gold -- which is really no big deal for an adventurer of even 2nd level -- and potentially a question of how many hands you're using at any given time.



                  I don't think the 'number of hands' issue is worth worrying about unless the DM really likes to get fiddly about things like that. Consider the following complaint:



                  "Wait a minute, you're holding a torch in one hand and your arcane wand in the other, and you used your free object-interaction to put your wand away, so if you want to pull out your druidic focus you're going to have to use an action!"



                  If your DM might say something like that, then you may have an issue with 'doubling up' like that, as it would remove something your DM is treating as a limiting factor on your spellcasting. If your DM wouldn't say that, then sure, there's very likely no problem with a dual-use wand.






                  share|improve this answer














                  Rules as Written, no.



                  As written, an arcane focus is an arcane focus, and a druidic focus is a druidic focus. Everything else is just suggestions for descriptive text of what a specific focus might look like.



                  Rules as Fun, sure!



                  It totally makes sense for a cross-class character to double up their foci in a way that meets both requirements, so sure, go for it! (Pending DM permission, of course.) The only real, serious difference would be a matter of a few gold -- which is really no big deal for an adventurer of even 2nd level -- and potentially a question of how many hands you're using at any given time.



                  I don't think the 'number of hands' issue is worth worrying about unless the DM really likes to get fiddly about things like that. Consider the following complaint:



                  "Wait a minute, you're holding a torch in one hand and your arcane wand in the other, and you used your free object-interaction to put your wand away, so if you want to pull out your druidic focus you're going to have to use an action!"



                  If your DM might say something like that, then you may have an issue with 'doubling up' like that, as it would remove something your DM is treating as a limiting factor on your spellcasting. If your DM wouldn't say that, then sure, there's very likely no problem with a dual-use wand.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  Darth Pseudonym

                  9,1992254




                  9,1992254






















                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote













                      You need two wands; the same wand cannot serve both classes



                      From the Multiclassing rules, as written in the Player's Handbook, page 163:




                      Spells Known and Prepared. You determine what spells you know and can prepare for each class individually...



                      [...]



                      ... Similarly, a spellcasting focus, such as a holy symbol, can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus.




                      While a Yew Wand is almost certainly valid as a spellcasting focus for either a Druid or a Wizard, it's not valid for both at the same time. You'd need to acquire a second wand at the time you multiclass.



                      If focuses were permitted to be shared between multiple classes, the wording would read something like "can be used only for the spells from the classes associated with that focus"






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 5




                        Why can't the focus be associated to more than one class?
                        – NautArch
                        Nov 28 at 19:47






                      • 6




                        I don't see that interpretation as valid. Each class checks validity independently. Is it a Wand? Works for Wizard. Is it a Yew Want? Works for Druid. Same wand? Irrelevant. One wand can work fine for both. There is nothing in what you cited to support your assertion.
                        – MarkTO
                        Nov 28 at 19:50






                      • 6




                        I'm just not seeing the same thing you are. The quote says a focus can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus - but it's not saying that the focus can't associate to two classes and it doesn't say it can only do one. Unless I'm missing something.
                        – NautArch
                        Nov 28 at 20:08






                      • 6




                        This logic would imply that you could not use the same holy symbol for paladin and priest levels of the same faith. That seems... obviously incorrect.
                        – Ben Barden
                        Nov 28 at 20:51






                      • 2




                        @BenBarden Strictly speaking, in 5th edition, Paladins don't draw their power from the same source that Clerics do; Clerics draw their power from their Divine Connection, Paladins draw from their own Willpower and Convictions.
                        – Xirema
                        Nov 28 at 20:57

















                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote













                      You need two wands; the same wand cannot serve both classes



                      From the Multiclassing rules, as written in the Player's Handbook, page 163:




                      Spells Known and Prepared. You determine what spells you know and can prepare for each class individually...



                      [...]



                      ... Similarly, a spellcasting focus, such as a holy symbol, can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus.




                      While a Yew Wand is almost certainly valid as a spellcasting focus for either a Druid or a Wizard, it's not valid for both at the same time. You'd need to acquire a second wand at the time you multiclass.



                      If focuses were permitted to be shared between multiple classes, the wording would read something like "can be used only for the spells from the classes associated with that focus"






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 5




                        Why can't the focus be associated to more than one class?
                        – NautArch
                        Nov 28 at 19:47






                      • 6




                        I don't see that interpretation as valid. Each class checks validity independently. Is it a Wand? Works for Wizard. Is it a Yew Want? Works for Druid. Same wand? Irrelevant. One wand can work fine for both. There is nothing in what you cited to support your assertion.
                        – MarkTO
                        Nov 28 at 19:50






                      • 6




                        I'm just not seeing the same thing you are. The quote says a focus can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus - but it's not saying that the focus can't associate to two classes and it doesn't say it can only do one. Unless I'm missing something.
                        – NautArch
                        Nov 28 at 20:08






                      • 6




                        This logic would imply that you could not use the same holy symbol for paladin and priest levels of the same faith. That seems... obviously incorrect.
                        – Ben Barden
                        Nov 28 at 20:51






                      • 2




                        @BenBarden Strictly speaking, in 5th edition, Paladins don't draw their power from the same source that Clerics do; Clerics draw their power from their Divine Connection, Paladins draw from their own Willpower and Convictions.
                        – Xirema
                        Nov 28 at 20:57















                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote









                      You need two wands; the same wand cannot serve both classes



                      From the Multiclassing rules, as written in the Player's Handbook, page 163:




                      Spells Known and Prepared. You determine what spells you know and can prepare for each class individually...



                      [...]



                      ... Similarly, a spellcasting focus, such as a holy symbol, can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus.




                      While a Yew Wand is almost certainly valid as a spellcasting focus for either a Druid or a Wizard, it's not valid for both at the same time. You'd need to acquire a second wand at the time you multiclass.



                      If focuses were permitted to be shared between multiple classes, the wording would read something like "can be used only for the spells from the classes associated with that focus"






                      share|improve this answer














                      You need two wands; the same wand cannot serve both classes



                      From the Multiclassing rules, as written in the Player's Handbook, page 163:




                      Spells Known and Prepared. You determine what spells you know and can prepare for each class individually...



                      [...]



                      ... Similarly, a spellcasting focus, such as a holy symbol, can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus.




                      While a Yew Wand is almost certainly valid as a spellcasting focus for either a Druid or a Wizard, it's not valid for both at the same time. You'd need to acquire a second wand at the time you multiclass.



                      If focuses were permitted to be shared between multiple classes, the wording would read something like "can be used only for the spells from the classes associated with that focus"







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Nov 28 at 20:53

























                      answered Nov 28 at 19:04









                      Xirema

                      13.2k23881




                      13.2k23881








                      • 5




                        Why can't the focus be associated to more than one class?
                        – NautArch
                        Nov 28 at 19:47






                      • 6




                        I don't see that interpretation as valid. Each class checks validity independently. Is it a Wand? Works for Wizard. Is it a Yew Want? Works for Druid. Same wand? Irrelevant. One wand can work fine for both. There is nothing in what you cited to support your assertion.
                        – MarkTO
                        Nov 28 at 19:50






                      • 6




                        I'm just not seeing the same thing you are. The quote says a focus can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus - but it's not saying that the focus can't associate to two classes and it doesn't say it can only do one. Unless I'm missing something.
                        – NautArch
                        Nov 28 at 20:08






                      • 6




                        This logic would imply that you could not use the same holy symbol for paladin and priest levels of the same faith. That seems... obviously incorrect.
                        – Ben Barden
                        Nov 28 at 20:51






                      • 2




                        @BenBarden Strictly speaking, in 5th edition, Paladins don't draw their power from the same source that Clerics do; Clerics draw their power from their Divine Connection, Paladins draw from their own Willpower and Convictions.
                        – Xirema
                        Nov 28 at 20:57
















                      • 5




                        Why can't the focus be associated to more than one class?
                        – NautArch
                        Nov 28 at 19:47






                      • 6




                        I don't see that interpretation as valid. Each class checks validity independently. Is it a Wand? Works for Wizard. Is it a Yew Want? Works for Druid. Same wand? Irrelevant. One wand can work fine for both. There is nothing in what you cited to support your assertion.
                        – MarkTO
                        Nov 28 at 19:50






                      • 6




                        I'm just not seeing the same thing you are. The quote says a focus can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus - but it's not saying that the focus can't associate to two classes and it doesn't say it can only do one. Unless I'm missing something.
                        – NautArch
                        Nov 28 at 20:08






                      • 6




                        This logic would imply that you could not use the same holy symbol for paladin and priest levels of the same faith. That seems... obviously incorrect.
                        – Ben Barden
                        Nov 28 at 20:51






                      • 2




                        @BenBarden Strictly speaking, in 5th edition, Paladins don't draw their power from the same source that Clerics do; Clerics draw their power from their Divine Connection, Paladins draw from their own Willpower and Convictions.
                        – Xirema
                        Nov 28 at 20:57










                      5




                      5




                      Why can't the focus be associated to more than one class?
                      – NautArch
                      Nov 28 at 19:47




                      Why can't the focus be associated to more than one class?
                      – NautArch
                      Nov 28 at 19:47




                      6




                      6




                      I don't see that interpretation as valid. Each class checks validity independently. Is it a Wand? Works for Wizard. Is it a Yew Want? Works for Druid. Same wand? Irrelevant. One wand can work fine for both. There is nothing in what you cited to support your assertion.
                      – MarkTO
                      Nov 28 at 19:50




                      I don't see that interpretation as valid. Each class checks validity independently. Is it a Wand? Works for Wizard. Is it a Yew Want? Works for Druid. Same wand? Irrelevant. One wand can work fine for both. There is nothing in what you cited to support your assertion.
                      – MarkTO
                      Nov 28 at 19:50




                      6




                      6




                      I'm just not seeing the same thing you are. The quote says a focus can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus - but it's not saying that the focus can't associate to two classes and it doesn't say it can only do one. Unless I'm missing something.
                      – NautArch
                      Nov 28 at 20:08




                      I'm just not seeing the same thing you are. The quote says a focus can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus - but it's not saying that the focus can't associate to two classes and it doesn't say it can only do one. Unless I'm missing something.
                      – NautArch
                      Nov 28 at 20:08




                      6




                      6




                      This logic would imply that you could not use the same holy symbol for paladin and priest levels of the same faith. That seems... obviously incorrect.
                      – Ben Barden
                      Nov 28 at 20:51




                      This logic would imply that you could not use the same holy symbol for paladin and priest levels of the same faith. That seems... obviously incorrect.
                      – Ben Barden
                      Nov 28 at 20:51




                      2




                      2




                      @BenBarden Strictly speaking, in 5th edition, Paladins don't draw their power from the same source that Clerics do; Clerics draw their power from their Divine Connection, Paladins draw from their own Willpower and Convictions.
                      – Xirema
                      Nov 28 at 20:57






                      @BenBarden Strictly speaking, in 5th edition, Paladins don't draw their power from the same source that Clerics do; Clerics draw their power from their Divine Connection, Paladins draw from their own Willpower and Convictions.
                      – Xirema
                      Nov 28 at 20:57












                      Pik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Pik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Pik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Pik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136432%2fcan-yew-wands-be-used-as-a-focus-for-both-druids-and-wizards%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                      Alcedinidae

                      Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?