eval() not working with ggplot, returns “non-numeric argument to binary operator”











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have the following ggplot element stored as text:



eval(parse(text = " annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 30.31049879  * 1.02,
label = paste0( 19.48 , percent( 0.055 )), color = 'Blue') +
annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 33.341548669 * 1.02,
label = paste0( 21.43 , percent( 0.048 )), color = 'Blue') "))


eval() returns error "non-numeric argument to binary operator" since it's trying to add the two parts together, but the plus sign is used differently with ggplot. Is there any way to dodge this problem?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    What are you using the parse function for? Since you are hard coding everything, would it not be easier to just have the annotate() simply.
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 20:03










  • @Jrakru56 I have about twenty of those annotations so I figured out it might be easier to add them using a loop instead of hardcoding twenty rows.
    – kkz
    Nov 19 at 20:55






  • 1




    if that's the case, then you might be better off creating a data.frame or list to hold your x, y and 'label
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 20:59






  • 1




    Soemthing like this: dt<- mtcars; ggplot(data=dt) + geom_point(aes(x=mpg, y =hp )) + geom_text(aes(label = rownames(dt), x =mpg, y = hp))
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 21:08

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have the following ggplot element stored as text:



eval(parse(text = " annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 30.31049879  * 1.02,
label = paste0( 19.48 , percent( 0.055 )), color = 'Blue') +
annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 33.341548669 * 1.02,
label = paste0( 21.43 , percent( 0.048 )), color = 'Blue') "))


eval() returns error "non-numeric argument to binary operator" since it's trying to add the two parts together, but the plus sign is used differently with ggplot. Is there any way to dodge this problem?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    What are you using the parse function for? Since you are hard coding everything, would it not be easier to just have the annotate() simply.
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 20:03










  • @Jrakru56 I have about twenty of those annotations so I figured out it might be easier to add them using a loop instead of hardcoding twenty rows.
    – kkz
    Nov 19 at 20:55






  • 1




    if that's the case, then you might be better off creating a data.frame or list to hold your x, y and 'label
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 20:59






  • 1




    Soemthing like this: dt<- mtcars; ggplot(data=dt) + geom_point(aes(x=mpg, y =hp )) + geom_text(aes(label = rownames(dt), x =mpg, y = hp))
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 21:08















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have the following ggplot element stored as text:



eval(parse(text = " annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 30.31049879  * 1.02,
label = paste0( 19.48 , percent( 0.055 )), color = 'Blue') +
annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 33.341548669 * 1.02,
label = paste0( 21.43 , percent( 0.048 )), color = 'Blue') "))


eval() returns error "non-numeric argument to binary operator" since it's trying to add the two parts together, but the plus sign is used differently with ggplot. Is there any way to dodge this problem?










share|improve this question













I have the following ggplot element stored as text:



eval(parse(text = " annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 30.31049879  * 1.02,
label = paste0( 19.48 , percent( 0.055 )), color = 'Blue') +
annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 33.341548669 * 1.02,
label = paste0( 21.43 , percent( 0.048 )), color = 'Blue') "))


eval() returns error "non-numeric argument to binary operator" since it's trying to add the two parts together, but the plus sign is used differently with ggplot. Is there any way to dodge this problem?







r ggplot2






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 19 at 19:54









kkz

474




474








  • 1




    What are you using the parse function for? Since you are hard coding everything, would it not be easier to just have the annotate() simply.
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 20:03










  • @Jrakru56 I have about twenty of those annotations so I figured out it might be easier to add them using a loop instead of hardcoding twenty rows.
    – kkz
    Nov 19 at 20:55






  • 1




    if that's the case, then you might be better off creating a data.frame or list to hold your x, y and 'label
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 20:59






  • 1




    Soemthing like this: dt<- mtcars; ggplot(data=dt) + geom_point(aes(x=mpg, y =hp )) + geom_text(aes(label = rownames(dt), x =mpg, y = hp))
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 21:08
















  • 1




    What are you using the parse function for? Since you are hard coding everything, would it not be easier to just have the annotate() simply.
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 20:03










  • @Jrakru56 I have about twenty of those annotations so I figured out it might be easier to add them using a loop instead of hardcoding twenty rows.
    – kkz
    Nov 19 at 20:55






  • 1




    if that's the case, then you might be better off creating a data.frame or list to hold your x, y and 'label
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 20:59






  • 1




    Soemthing like this: dt<- mtcars; ggplot(data=dt) + geom_point(aes(x=mpg, y =hp )) + geom_text(aes(label = rownames(dt), x =mpg, y = hp))
    – Jrakru56
    Nov 19 at 21:08










1




1




What are you using the parse function for? Since you are hard coding everything, would it not be easier to just have the annotate() simply.
– Jrakru56
Nov 19 at 20:03




What are you using the parse function for? Since you are hard coding everything, would it not be easier to just have the annotate() simply.
– Jrakru56
Nov 19 at 20:03












@Jrakru56 I have about twenty of those annotations so I figured out it might be easier to add them using a loop instead of hardcoding twenty rows.
– kkz
Nov 19 at 20:55




@Jrakru56 I have about twenty of those annotations so I figured out it might be easier to add them using a loop instead of hardcoding twenty rows.
– kkz
Nov 19 at 20:55




1




1




if that's the case, then you might be better off creating a data.frame or list to hold your x, y and 'label
– Jrakru56
Nov 19 at 20:59




if that's the case, then you might be better off creating a data.frame or list to hold your x, y and 'label
– Jrakru56
Nov 19 at 20:59




1




1




Soemthing like this: dt<- mtcars; ggplot(data=dt) + geom_point(aes(x=mpg, y =hp )) + geom_text(aes(label = rownames(dt), x =mpg, y = hp))
– Jrakru56
Nov 19 at 21:08






Soemthing like this: dt<- mtcars; ggplot(data=dt) + geom_point(aes(x=mpg, y =hp )) + geom_text(aes(label = rownames(dt), x =mpg, y = hp))
– Jrakru56
Nov 19 at 21:08














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










This was solved by putting ggplot() + at the start of the code, i.e.



eval(parse(text = "ggplot() +
annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 30.31049879 * 1.02,
label = paste0( 19.48 , percent( 0.055 )), color = 'Blue') +
annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 33.341548669 * 1.02,
label = paste0( 21.43 , percent( 0.048 )), color = 'Blue') "))





share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53381724%2feval-not-working-with-ggplot-returns-non-numeric-argument-to-binary-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    This was solved by putting ggplot() + at the start of the code, i.e.



    eval(parse(text = "ggplot() +
    annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 30.31049879 * 1.02,
    label = paste0( 19.48 , percent( 0.055 )), color = 'Blue') +
    annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 33.341548669 * 1.02,
    label = paste0( 21.43 , percent( 0.048 )), color = 'Blue') "))





    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      This was solved by putting ggplot() + at the start of the code, i.e.



      eval(parse(text = "ggplot() +
      annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 30.31049879 * 1.02,
      label = paste0( 19.48 , percent( 0.055 )), color = 'Blue') +
      annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 33.341548669 * 1.02,
      label = paste0( 21.43 , percent( 0.048 )), color = 'Blue') "))





      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        This was solved by putting ggplot() + at the start of the code, i.e.



        eval(parse(text = "ggplot() +
        annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 30.31049879 * 1.02,
        label = paste0( 19.48 , percent( 0.055 )), color = 'Blue') +
        annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 33.341548669 * 1.02,
        label = paste0( 21.43 , percent( 0.048 )), color = 'Blue') "))





        share|improve this answer












        This was solved by putting ggplot() + at the start of the code, i.e.



        eval(parse(text = "ggplot() +
        annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 30.31049879 * 1.02,
        label = paste0( 19.48 , percent( 0.055 )), color = 'Blue') +
        annotate('text', as.Date('2013-12-31'), 33.341548669 * 1.02,
        label = paste0( 21.43 , percent( 0.048 )), color = 'Blue') "))






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 20 at 11:15









        kkz

        474




        474






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53381724%2feval-not-working-with-ggplot-returns-non-numeric-argument-to-binary-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]