What are some examples of paradoxical words?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
The word "non-hyphenated" is a paradoxical word in that it is a word about words, but it does not describe itself.
I have two questions:
- Is there a name for these types of paradoxical words?
- What are some other examples of them?
logic
asked Aug 14 '17 at 2:21
Zubin Mukerjee
396210
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
The word "non-hyphenated" is a paradoxical word in that it is a word about words, but it does not describe itself.
I have two questions:
- Is there a name for these types of paradoxical words?
- What are some other examples of them?
logic
asked Aug 14 '17 at 2:21
Zubin Mukerjee
396210
Sanguine Defs 2 and 4: merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sanguine I've always liked stop signs. You may be wandering into semiotics here: visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/sem02.html
– Wayfaring Stranger
Aug 14 '17 at 3:32
Possible duplicate of Is there a term for a word that defeats its own purpose?
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:37
2
From wikipedia: The opposite is a heterological word, one that does not apply to itself (e.g. "long" is not long, "monosyllabic" has five syllables, "German" is not German).
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:38
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
The word "non-hyphenated" is a paradoxical word in that it is a word about words, but it does not describe itself.
I have two questions:
- Is there a name for these types of paradoxical words?
- What are some other examples of them?
logic
asked Aug 14 '17 at 2:21
Zubin Mukerjee
396210
The word "non-hyphenated" is a paradoxical word in that it is a word about words, but it does not describe itself.
I have two questions:
- Is there a name for these types of paradoxical words?
- What are some other examples of them?
logic
logic
asked Aug 14 '17 at 2:21
Zubin Mukerjee
396210
asked Aug 14 '17 at 2:21
Zubin Mukerjee
396210
edited Aug 14 '17 at 5:25
asked Aug 14 '17 at 2:21
Zubin Mukerjee
396210
asked Aug 14 '17 at 2:21
Zubin Mukerjee
396210
asked Aug 14 '17 at 2:21
Zubin Mukerjee
396210
396210
Sanguine Defs 2 and 4: merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sanguine I've always liked stop signs. You may be wandering into semiotics here: visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/sem02.html
– Wayfaring Stranger
Aug 14 '17 at 3:32
Possible duplicate of Is there a term for a word that defeats its own purpose?
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:37
2
From wikipedia: The opposite is a heterological word, one that does not apply to itself (e.g. "long" is not long, "monosyllabic" has five syllables, "German" is not German).
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:38
add a comment |
Sanguine Defs 2 and 4: merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sanguine I've always liked stop signs. You may be wandering into semiotics here: visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/sem02.html
– Wayfaring Stranger
Aug 14 '17 at 3:32
Possible duplicate of Is there a term for a word that defeats its own purpose?
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:37
2
From wikipedia: The opposite is a heterological word, one that does not apply to itself (e.g. "long" is not long, "monosyllabic" has five syllables, "German" is not German).
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:38
Sanguine Defs 2 and 4: merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sanguine I've always liked stop signs. You may be wandering into semiotics here: visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/sem02.html
– Wayfaring Stranger
Aug 14 '17 at 3:32
Sanguine Defs 2 and 4: merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sanguine I've always liked stop signs. You may be wandering into semiotics here: visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/sem02.html
– Wayfaring Stranger
Aug 14 '17 at 3:32
Possible duplicate of Is there a term for a word that defeats its own purpose?
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:37
Possible duplicate of Is there a term for a word that defeats its own purpose?
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:37
2
2
From wikipedia: The opposite is a heterological word, one that does not apply to itself (e.g. "long" is not long, "monosyllabic" has five syllables, "German" is not German).
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:38
From wikipedia: The opposite is a heterological word, one that does not apply to itself (e.g. "long" is not long, "monosyllabic" has five syllables, "German" is not German).
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:38
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
As Lawrence notes, such a word is heterological.
Heterological adjective
A word that does not apply to itself
Wikipedia
By contrast a word which does describe itself is autological or homological.
The word heterological is not merely "paradoxical" in that it describes words which don't describe themselves, it also leads to a paradox all of its own. Consider the question: is the word "heterological" itself heterological or autological?
Given the definition of "heterological", it follows that if "heterological" is heterological then it's autological, and if it's autological then it's heterological.
This is known as the Grelling-Nelson Paradox, and has similarities to the famous paradox of Bertrand Russell based the "set of all sets which don't contain themselves" and asks "Does such a set contain itself?"
answered Aug 14 '17 at 5:04
Steve Lovell
1,358214
Interesting! Grelling-Nelson sounds like it is a specific case of the liar parardox.
– Zubin Mukerjee
Aug 14 '17 at 5:20
And this is the third time in five days I've run across mention of the Bertrand Russell Paradox, which had escaped my notice the previous fifty years or so. Bizarre.
– Phil Sweet
Dec 14 at 22:33
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Uncategorised.
That's a category if you ask me.
answered Dec 14 at 17:10
Luke Puplett
1011
New contributor
Luke Puplett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f405681%2fwhat-are-some-examples-of-paradoxical-words%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
As Lawrence notes, such a word is heterological.
Heterological adjective
A word that does not apply to itself
Wikipedia
By contrast a word which does describe itself is autological or homological.
The word heterological is not merely "paradoxical" in that it describes words which don't describe themselves, it also leads to a paradox all of its own. Consider the question: is the word "heterological" itself heterological or autological?
Given the definition of "heterological", it follows that if "heterological" is heterological then it's autological, and if it's autological then it's heterological.
This is known as the Grelling-Nelson Paradox, and has similarities to the famous paradox of Bertrand Russell based the "set of all sets which don't contain themselves" and asks "Does such a set contain itself?"
answered Aug 14 '17 at 5:04
Steve Lovell
1,358214
Interesting! Grelling-Nelson sounds like it is a specific case of the liar parardox.
– Zubin Mukerjee
Aug 14 '17 at 5:20
And this is the third time in five days I've run across mention of the Bertrand Russell Paradox, which had escaped my notice the previous fifty years or so. Bizarre.
– Phil Sweet
Dec 14 at 22:33
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
As Lawrence notes, such a word is heterological.
Heterological adjective
A word that does not apply to itself
Wikipedia
By contrast a word which does describe itself is autological or homological.
The word heterological is not merely "paradoxical" in that it describes words which don't describe themselves, it also leads to a paradox all of its own. Consider the question: is the word "heterological" itself heterological or autological?
Given the definition of "heterological", it follows that if "heterological" is heterological then it's autological, and if it's autological then it's heterological.
This is known as the Grelling-Nelson Paradox, and has similarities to the famous paradox of Bertrand Russell based the "set of all sets which don't contain themselves" and asks "Does such a set contain itself?"
answered Aug 14 '17 at 5:04
Steve Lovell
1,358214
Interesting! Grelling-Nelson sounds like it is a specific case of the liar parardox.
– Zubin Mukerjee
Aug 14 '17 at 5:20
And this is the third time in five days I've run across mention of the Bertrand Russell Paradox, which had escaped my notice the previous fifty years or so. Bizarre.
– Phil Sweet
Dec 14 at 22:33
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
As Lawrence notes, such a word is heterological.
Heterological adjective
A word that does not apply to itself
Wikipedia
By contrast a word which does describe itself is autological or homological.
The word heterological is not merely "paradoxical" in that it describes words which don't describe themselves, it also leads to a paradox all of its own. Consider the question: is the word "heterological" itself heterological or autological?
Given the definition of "heterological", it follows that if "heterological" is heterological then it's autological, and if it's autological then it's heterological.
This is known as the Grelling-Nelson Paradox, and has similarities to the famous paradox of Bertrand Russell based the "set of all sets which don't contain themselves" and asks "Does such a set contain itself?"
answered Aug 14 '17 at 5:04
Steve Lovell
1,358214
As Lawrence notes, such a word is heterological.
Heterological adjective
A word that does not apply to itself
Wikipedia
By contrast a word which does describe itself is autological or homological.
The word heterological is not merely "paradoxical" in that it describes words which don't describe themselves, it also leads to a paradox all of its own. Consider the question: is the word "heterological" itself heterological or autological?
Given the definition of "heterological", it follows that if "heterological" is heterological then it's autological, and if it's autological then it's heterological.
This is known as the Grelling-Nelson Paradox, and has similarities to the famous paradox of Bertrand Russell based the "set of all sets which don't contain themselves" and asks "Does such a set contain itself?"
answered Aug 14 '17 at 5:04
Steve Lovell
1,358214
edited Aug 14 '17 at 5:14
answered Aug 14 '17 at 5:04
Steve Lovell
1,358214
answered Aug 14 '17 at 5:04
Steve Lovell
1,358214
answered Aug 14 '17 at 5:04
Steve Lovell
1,358214
1,358214
Interesting! Grelling-Nelson sounds like it is a specific case of the liar parardox.
– Zubin Mukerjee
Aug 14 '17 at 5:20
And this is the third time in five days I've run across mention of the Bertrand Russell Paradox, which had escaped my notice the previous fifty years or so. Bizarre.
– Phil Sweet
Dec 14 at 22:33
add a comment |
Interesting! Grelling-Nelson sounds like it is a specific case of the liar parardox.
– Zubin Mukerjee
Aug 14 '17 at 5:20
And this is the third time in five days I've run across mention of the Bertrand Russell Paradox, which had escaped my notice the previous fifty years or so. Bizarre.
– Phil Sweet
Dec 14 at 22:33
Interesting! Grelling-Nelson sounds like it is a specific case of the liar parardox.
– Zubin Mukerjee
Aug 14 '17 at 5:20
Interesting! Grelling-Nelson sounds like it is a specific case of the liar parardox.
– Zubin Mukerjee
Aug 14 '17 at 5:20
And this is the third time in five days I've run across mention of the Bertrand Russell Paradox, which had escaped my notice the previous fifty years or so. Bizarre.
– Phil Sweet
Dec 14 at 22:33
And this is the third time in five days I've run across mention of the Bertrand Russell Paradox, which had escaped my notice the previous fifty years or so. Bizarre.
– Phil Sweet
Dec 14 at 22:33
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Uncategorised.
That's a category if you ask me.
answered Dec 14 at 17:10
Luke Puplett
1011
New contributor
Luke Puplett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Uncategorised.
That's a category if you ask me.
answered Dec 14 at 17:10
Luke Puplett
1011
New contributor
Luke Puplett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Uncategorised.
That's a category if you ask me.
answered Dec 14 at 17:10
Luke Puplett
1011
New contributor
Luke Puplett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Uncategorised.
That's a category if you ask me.
answered Dec 14 at 17:10
Luke Puplett
1011
New contributor
Luke Puplett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 14 at 17:10
Luke Puplett
1011
New contributor
Luke Puplett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 14 at 17:10
Luke Puplett
1011
answered Dec 14 at 17:10
Luke Puplett
1011
1011
New contributor
Luke Puplett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Luke Puplett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Luke Puplett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f405681%2fwhat-are-some-examples-of-paradoxical-words%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Sanguine Defs 2 and 4: merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sanguine I've always liked stop signs. You may be wandering into semiotics here: visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/sem02.html
– Wayfaring Stranger
Aug 14 '17 at 3:32
Possible duplicate of Is there a term for a word that defeats its own purpose?
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:37
2
From wikipedia: The opposite is a heterological word, one that does not apply to itself (e.g. "long" is not long, "monosyllabic" has five syllables, "German" is not German).
– Lawrence
Aug 14 '17 at 4:38