Gerund or Infinitives?












0














How can I grammatically explain gerund "seeking" in this sentence? Can I use "to seek" instead?




I am Sharron Biggs, CEO and founder of BiggsGraphics. I recently came across your advertisement seeking the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects.











share|improve this question









New contributor




AnhLe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • No, you can't. An infinitival clause would be a relative one, but that wouldn't work here since non-wh infinitival relatives have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", which would make no sense here. Note, though, that you could replace it with a finite relative clause, e.g. "I recently came across your advertisement [that seeks the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects].
    – BillJ
    2 days ago












  • You asked Colin about the possibility of "We're conducting a campaign [to increase sales]". Yes, this is fine, but it has nothing to do with nouns. It's a purpose adjunct consisting of an infinitival clause modifying "campaign".
    – BillJ
    2 days ago










  • Is "seek" an action verb used for people in passive voice? Can "advertisement" go with "seek"?
    – AnhLe
    2 days ago










  • You could say I recently came across your advertisement that you are using to seek the partnership of a graphic designer.
    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago


















0














How can I grammatically explain gerund "seeking" in this sentence? Can I use "to seek" instead?




I am Sharron Biggs, CEO and founder of BiggsGraphics. I recently came across your advertisement seeking the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects.











share|improve this question









New contributor




AnhLe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • No, you can't. An infinitival clause would be a relative one, but that wouldn't work here since non-wh infinitival relatives have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", which would make no sense here. Note, though, that you could replace it with a finite relative clause, e.g. "I recently came across your advertisement [that seeks the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects].
    – BillJ
    2 days ago












  • You asked Colin about the possibility of "We're conducting a campaign [to increase sales]". Yes, this is fine, but it has nothing to do with nouns. It's a purpose adjunct consisting of an infinitival clause modifying "campaign".
    – BillJ
    2 days ago










  • Is "seek" an action verb used for people in passive voice? Can "advertisement" go with "seek"?
    – AnhLe
    2 days ago










  • You could say I recently came across your advertisement that you are using to seek the partnership of a graphic designer.
    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago
















0












0








0







How can I grammatically explain gerund "seeking" in this sentence? Can I use "to seek" instead?




I am Sharron Biggs, CEO and founder of BiggsGraphics. I recently came across your advertisement seeking the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects.











share|improve this question









New contributor




AnhLe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











How can I grammatically explain gerund "seeking" in this sentence? Can I use "to seek" instead?




I am Sharron Biggs, CEO and founder of BiggsGraphics. I recently came across your advertisement seeking the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects.








participles infinitive-vs-gerund






share|improve this question









New contributor




AnhLe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




AnhLe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Mari-Lou A

61.7k55216455




61.7k55216455






New contributor




AnhLe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









AnhLe

1




1




New contributor




AnhLe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





AnhLe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






AnhLe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • No, you can't. An infinitival clause would be a relative one, but that wouldn't work here since non-wh infinitival relatives have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", which would make no sense here. Note, though, that you could replace it with a finite relative clause, e.g. "I recently came across your advertisement [that seeks the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects].
    – BillJ
    2 days ago












  • You asked Colin about the possibility of "We're conducting a campaign [to increase sales]". Yes, this is fine, but it has nothing to do with nouns. It's a purpose adjunct consisting of an infinitival clause modifying "campaign".
    – BillJ
    2 days ago










  • Is "seek" an action verb used for people in passive voice? Can "advertisement" go with "seek"?
    – AnhLe
    2 days ago










  • You could say I recently came across your advertisement that you are using to seek the partnership of a graphic designer.
    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago




















  • No, you can't. An infinitival clause would be a relative one, but that wouldn't work here since non-wh infinitival relatives have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", which would make no sense here. Note, though, that you could replace it with a finite relative clause, e.g. "I recently came across your advertisement [that seeks the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects].
    – BillJ
    2 days ago












  • You asked Colin about the possibility of "We're conducting a campaign [to increase sales]". Yes, this is fine, but it has nothing to do with nouns. It's a purpose adjunct consisting of an infinitival clause modifying "campaign".
    – BillJ
    2 days ago










  • Is "seek" an action verb used for people in passive voice? Can "advertisement" go with "seek"?
    – AnhLe
    2 days ago










  • You could say I recently came across your advertisement that you are using to seek the partnership of a graphic designer.
    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago


















No, you can't. An infinitival clause would be a relative one, but that wouldn't work here since non-wh infinitival relatives have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", which would make no sense here. Note, though, that you could replace it with a finite relative clause, e.g. "I recently came across your advertisement [that seeks the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects].
– BillJ
2 days ago






No, you can't. An infinitival clause would be a relative one, but that wouldn't work here since non-wh infinitival relatives have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", which would make no sense here. Note, though, that you could replace it with a finite relative clause, e.g. "I recently came across your advertisement [that seeks the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects].
– BillJ
2 days ago














You asked Colin about the possibility of "We're conducting a campaign [to increase sales]". Yes, this is fine, but it has nothing to do with nouns. It's a purpose adjunct consisting of an infinitival clause modifying "campaign".
– BillJ
2 days ago




You asked Colin about the possibility of "We're conducting a campaign [to increase sales]". Yes, this is fine, but it has nothing to do with nouns. It's a purpose adjunct consisting of an infinitival clause modifying "campaign".
– BillJ
2 days ago












Is "seek" an action verb used for people in passive voice? Can "advertisement" go with "seek"?
– AnhLe
2 days ago




Is "seek" an action verb used for people in passive voice? Can "advertisement" go with "seek"?
– AnhLe
2 days ago












You could say I recently came across your advertisement that you are using to seek the partnership of a graphic designer.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago






You could say I recently came across your advertisement that you are using to seek the partnership of a graphic designer.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














"Seeking" is not a gerund there, but a participle, the head of the postposed adjectival (participial) clause "seeking the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects", which modifies "advertisement".



Neither a gerund nor an infinitive would make sense there, as they both fulfil the role of a noun phrase.






share|improve this answer





















  • Thank you. How about this sentence? "We're conducting a campaign to increase sales". Does "to increase" function as a noun?
    – AnhLe
    2 days ago










  • @AnhLe: I wondered whether to mention that special case, and decided not to. Normally a "to" infinitive, like a gerund, heads a clause that functions as a noun phrase. But an infinitive clause can also be used as an adjectival or adverbial clause of purpose. Here "to increase sales" is adjectival.
    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago










  • @ColinFine The infinitival "to increase sales" is strictly speaking ambiguous. It could either be a purpose adjunct as in "We're conducting a campaign (in order) to increase sales, or a complement of the noun "campaign". Infinitival relatives (your 'adjectival') have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", but I don't think that meaning would make much sense here.
    – BillJ
    2 days ago










  • @BillJ: true; I missed the alternative parse (though in this case there's little difference in meaning).
    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






AnhLe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478378%2fgerund-or-infinitives%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














"Seeking" is not a gerund there, but a participle, the head of the postposed adjectival (participial) clause "seeking the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects", which modifies "advertisement".



Neither a gerund nor an infinitive would make sense there, as they both fulfil the role of a noun phrase.






share|improve this answer





















  • Thank you. How about this sentence? "We're conducting a campaign to increase sales". Does "to increase" function as a noun?
    – AnhLe
    2 days ago










  • @AnhLe: I wondered whether to mention that special case, and decided not to. Normally a "to" infinitive, like a gerund, heads a clause that functions as a noun phrase. But an infinitive clause can also be used as an adjectival or adverbial clause of purpose. Here "to increase sales" is adjectival.
    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago










  • @ColinFine The infinitival "to increase sales" is strictly speaking ambiguous. It could either be a purpose adjunct as in "We're conducting a campaign (in order) to increase sales, or a complement of the noun "campaign". Infinitival relatives (your 'adjectival') have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", but I don't think that meaning would make much sense here.
    – BillJ
    2 days ago










  • @BillJ: true; I missed the alternative parse (though in this case there's little difference in meaning).
    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago
















1














"Seeking" is not a gerund there, but a participle, the head of the postposed adjectival (participial) clause "seeking the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects", which modifies "advertisement".



Neither a gerund nor an infinitive would make sense there, as they both fulfil the role of a noun phrase.






share|improve this answer





















  • Thank you. How about this sentence? "We're conducting a campaign to increase sales". Does "to increase" function as a noun?
    – AnhLe
    2 days ago










  • @AnhLe: I wondered whether to mention that special case, and decided not to. Normally a "to" infinitive, like a gerund, heads a clause that functions as a noun phrase. But an infinitive clause can also be used as an adjectival or adverbial clause of purpose. Here "to increase sales" is adjectival.
    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago










  • @ColinFine The infinitival "to increase sales" is strictly speaking ambiguous. It could either be a purpose adjunct as in "We're conducting a campaign (in order) to increase sales, or a complement of the noun "campaign". Infinitival relatives (your 'adjectival') have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", but I don't think that meaning would make much sense here.
    – BillJ
    2 days ago










  • @BillJ: true; I missed the alternative parse (though in this case there's little difference in meaning).
    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago














1












1








1






"Seeking" is not a gerund there, but a participle, the head of the postposed adjectival (participial) clause "seeking the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects", which modifies "advertisement".



Neither a gerund nor an infinitive would make sense there, as they both fulfil the role of a noun phrase.






share|improve this answer












"Seeking" is not a gerund there, but a participle, the head of the postposed adjectival (participial) clause "seeking the partnership of a graphic design company for a number of your projects", which modifies "advertisement".



Neither a gerund nor an infinitive would make sense there, as they both fulfil the role of a noun phrase.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Colin Fine

63.7k170160




63.7k170160












  • Thank you. How about this sentence? "We're conducting a campaign to increase sales". Does "to increase" function as a noun?
    – AnhLe
    2 days ago










  • @AnhLe: I wondered whether to mention that special case, and decided not to. Normally a "to" infinitive, like a gerund, heads a clause that functions as a noun phrase. But an infinitive clause can also be used as an adjectival or adverbial clause of purpose. Here "to increase sales" is adjectival.
    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago










  • @ColinFine The infinitival "to increase sales" is strictly speaking ambiguous. It could either be a purpose adjunct as in "We're conducting a campaign (in order) to increase sales, or a complement of the noun "campaign". Infinitival relatives (your 'adjectival') have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", but I don't think that meaning would make much sense here.
    – BillJ
    2 days ago










  • @BillJ: true; I missed the alternative parse (though in this case there's little difference in meaning).
    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago


















  • Thank you. How about this sentence? "We're conducting a campaign to increase sales". Does "to increase" function as a noun?
    – AnhLe
    2 days ago










  • @AnhLe: I wondered whether to mention that special case, and decided not to. Normally a "to" infinitive, like a gerund, heads a clause that functions as a noun phrase. But an infinitive clause can also be used as an adjectival or adverbial clause of purpose. Here "to increase sales" is adjectival.
    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago










  • @ColinFine The infinitival "to increase sales" is strictly speaking ambiguous. It could either be a purpose adjunct as in "We're conducting a campaign (in order) to increase sales, or a complement of the noun "campaign". Infinitival relatives (your 'adjectival') have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", but I don't think that meaning would make much sense here.
    – BillJ
    2 days ago










  • @BillJ: true; I missed the alternative parse (though in this case there's little difference in meaning).
    – Colin Fine
    2 days ago
















Thank you. How about this sentence? "We're conducting a campaign to increase sales". Does "to increase" function as a noun?
– AnhLe
2 days ago




Thank you. How about this sentence? "We're conducting a campaign to increase sales". Does "to increase" function as a noun?
– AnhLe
2 days ago












@AnhLe: I wondered whether to mention that special case, and decided not to. Normally a "to" infinitive, like a gerund, heads a clause that functions as a noun phrase. But an infinitive clause can also be used as an adjectival or adverbial clause of purpose. Here "to increase sales" is adjectival.
– Colin Fine
2 days ago




@AnhLe: I wondered whether to mention that special case, and decided not to. Normally a "to" infinitive, like a gerund, heads a clause that functions as a noun phrase. But an infinitive clause can also be used as an adjectival or adverbial clause of purpose. Here "to increase sales" is adjectival.
– Colin Fine
2 days ago












@ColinFine The infinitival "to increase sales" is strictly speaking ambiguous. It could either be a purpose adjunct as in "We're conducting a campaign (in order) to increase sales, or a complement of the noun "campaign". Infinitival relatives (your 'adjectival') have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", but I don't think that meaning would make much sense here.
– BillJ
2 days ago




@ColinFine The infinitival "to increase sales" is strictly speaking ambiguous. It could either be a purpose adjunct as in "We're conducting a campaign (in order) to increase sales, or a complement of the noun "campaign". Infinitival relatives (your 'adjectival') have a modal meaning similar to that expressed by "can" or "should", but I don't think that meaning would make much sense here.
– BillJ
2 days ago












@BillJ: true; I missed the alternative parse (though in this case there's little difference in meaning).
– Colin Fine
2 days ago




@BillJ: true; I missed the alternative parse (though in this case there's little difference in meaning).
– Colin Fine
2 days ago










AnhLe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















AnhLe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













AnhLe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












AnhLe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478378%2fgerund-or-infinitives%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

RAC Tourist Trophy