''happiness is only real when shared'' or ''hapiness only real …'' [on hold]
When we can avoid to put the verb to be?
In this case are both correct or ''happiness' only real....'' because of the double ss at the end of the word we can avoid to write it down? because the sound is complete
thank you :)
grammatical-structure
put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Hot Licks, sumelic, jimm101, Scott, Rory Alsop 2 days ago
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
When we can avoid to put the verb to be?
In this case are both correct or ''happiness' only real....'' because of the double ss at the end of the word we can avoid to write it down? because the sound is complete
thank you :)
grammatical-structure
put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Hot Licks, sumelic, jimm101, Scott, Rory Alsop 2 days ago
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
– mikeY
Dec 18 at 21:39
add a comment |
When we can avoid to put the verb to be?
In this case are both correct or ''happiness' only real....'' because of the double ss at the end of the word we can avoid to write it down? because the sound is complete
thank you :)
grammatical-structure
When we can avoid to put the verb to be?
In this case are both correct or ''happiness' only real....'' because of the double ss at the end of the word we can avoid to write it down? because the sound is complete
thank you :)
grammatical-structure
grammatical-structure
asked Dec 18 at 21:30
Sofia Sotgia
111
111
put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Hot Licks, sumelic, jimm101, Scott, Rory Alsop 2 days ago
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Hot Licks, sumelic, jimm101, Scott, Rory Alsop 2 days ago
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
– mikeY
Dec 18 at 21:39
add a comment |
Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
– mikeY
Dec 18 at 21:39
Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
– mikeY
Dec 18 at 21:39
Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
– mikeY
Dec 18 at 21:39
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No, you cannot use the contraction "happiness'" for "happiness is". In general, you can only use the "'s" suffix in its verbal form on pronouns e.g. "he's", "she's", "it's", "who's".
If you see the "'s" suffix on other words, it generally denotes possession, e.g. "the fox's glove", "the house's porch".
Maybe in spoken English, you could get away with eliding the "is" into the double "s"es, but I've never heard anyone who isn't very drunk pronounce it that way ;) If you did add an apostrophe to the end, because "happiness" is a noun, it would imply possession, which doesn't make much sense.
If you want to avoid the "to be" verb, you could use this construction
Happiness: only real when shared.
However, in English it's hard to get away with writing a sentence without a verb. Lacking an action, because "happiness" is the subject, it's difficult to get around using "is" without getting weird sentences like the example
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, you cannot use the contraction "happiness'" for "happiness is". In general, you can only use the "'s" suffix in its verbal form on pronouns e.g. "he's", "she's", "it's", "who's".
If you see the "'s" suffix on other words, it generally denotes possession, e.g. "the fox's glove", "the house's porch".
Maybe in spoken English, you could get away with eliding the "is" into the double "s"es, but I've never heard anyone who isn't very drunk pronounce it that way ;) If you did add an apostrophe to the end, because "happiness" is a noun, it would imply possession, which doesn't make much sense.
If you want to avoid the "to be" verb, you could use this construction
Happiness: only real when shared.
However, in English it's hard to get away with writing a sentence without a verb. Lacking an action, because "happiness" is the subject, it's difficult to get around using "is" without getting weird sentences like the example
add a comment |
No, you cannot use the contraction "happiness'" for "happiness is". In general, you can only use the "'s" suffix in its verbal form on pronouns e.g. "he's", "she's", "it's", "who's".
If you see the "'s" suffix on other words, it generally denotes possession, e.g. "the fox's glove", "the house's porch".
Maybe in spoken English, you could get away with eliding the "is" into the double "s"es, but I've never heard anyone who isn't very drunk pronounce it that way ;) If you did add an apostrophe to the end, because "happiness" is a noun, it would imply possession, which doesn't make much sense.
If you want to avoid the "to be" verb, you could use this construction
Happiness: only real when shared.
However, in English it's hard to get away with writing a sentence without a verb. Lacking an action, because "happiness" is the subject, it's difficult to get around using "is" without getting weird sentences like the example
add a comment |
No, you cannot use the contraction "happiness'" for "happiness is". In general, you can only use the "'s" suffix in its verbal form on pronouns e.g. "he's", "she's", "it's", "who's".
If you see the "'s" suffix on other words, it generally denotes possession, e.g. "the fox's glove", "the house's porch".
Maybe in spoken English, you could get away with eliding the "is" into the double "s"es, but I've never heard anyone who isn't very drunk pronounce it that way ;) If you did add an apostrophe to the end, because "happiness" is a noun, it would imply possession, which doesn't make much sense.
If you want to avoid the "to be" verb, you could use this construction
Happiness: only real when shared.
However, in English it's hard to get away with writing a sentence without a verb. Lacking an action, because "happiness" is the subject, it's difficult to get around using "is" without getting weird sentences like the example
No, you cannot use the contraction "happiness'" for "happiness is". In general, you can only use the "'s" suffix in its verbal form on pronouns e.g. "he's", "she's", "it's", "who's".
If you see the "'s" suffix on other words, it generally denotes possession, e.g. "the fox's glove", "the house's porch".
Maybe in spoken English, you could get away with eliding the "is" into the double "s"es, but I've never heard anyone who isn't very drunk pronounce it that way ;) If you did add an apostrophe to the end, because "happiness" is a noun, it would imply possession, which doesn't make much sense.
If you want to avoid the "to be" verb, you could use this construction
Happiness: only real when shared.
However, in English it's hard to get away with writing a sentence without a verb. Lacking an action, because "happiness" is the subject, it's difficult to get around using "is" without getting weird sentences like the example
answered Dec 18 at 22:11
Zaya
4177
4177
add a comment |
add a comment |
Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
– mikeY
Dec 18 at 21:39