''happiness is only real when shared'' or ''hapiness only real …'' [on hold]












0














When we can avoid to put the verb to be?



In this case are both correct or ''happiness' only real....'' because of the double ss at the end of the word we can avoid to write it down? because the sound is complete



thank you :)










share|improve this question













put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Hot Licks, sumelic, jimm101, Scott, Rory Alsop 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
    – mikeY
    Dec 18 at 21:39
















0














When we can avoid to put the verb to be?



In this case are both correct or ''happiness' only real....'' because of the double ss at the end of the word we can avoid to write it down? because the sound is complete



thank you :)










share|improve this question













put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Hot Licks, sumelic, jimm101, Scott, Rory Alsop 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
    – mikeY
    Dec 18 at 21:39














0












0








0







When we can avoid to put the verb to be?



In this case are both correct or ''happiness' only real....'' because of the double ss at the end of the word we can avoid to write it down? because the sound is complete



thank you :)










share|improve this question













When we can avoid to put the verb to be?



In this case are both correct or ''happiness' only real....'' because of the double ss at the end of the word we can avoid to write it down? because the sound is complete



thank you :)







grammatical-structure






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 18 at 21:30









Sofia Sotgia

111




111




put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Hot Licks, sumelic, jimm101, Scott, Rory Alsop 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Hot Licks, sumelic, jimm101, Scott, Rory Alsop 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
    – mikeY
    Dec 18 at 21:39


















  • Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
    – mikeY
    Dec 18 at 21:39
















Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
– mikeY
Dec 18 at 21:39




Not really sure what you are asking. "Your happiness matters to me!" he declared. Works fine. "Your happiness is what matters to me!" he declared. Works okay. "Your happiness only important thing!" he declared. Not so much.
– mikeY
Dec 18 at 21:39










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














No, you cannot use the contraction "happiness'" for "happiness is". In general, you can only use the "'s" suffix in its verbal form on pronouns e.g. "he's", "she's", "it's", "who's".

If you see the "'s" suffix on other words, it generally denotes possession, e.g. "the fox's glove", "the house's porch".



Maybe in spoken English, you could get away with eliding the "is" into the double "s"es, but I've never heard anyone who isn't very drunk pronounce it that way ;) If you did add an apostrophe to the end, because "happiness" is a noun, it would imply possession, which doesn't make much sense.



If you want to avoid the "to be" verb, you could use this construction




Happiness: only real when shared.




However, in English it's hard to get away with writing a sentence without a verb. Lacking an action, because "happiness" is the subject, it's difficult to get around using "is" without getting weird sentences like the example






share|improve this answer




























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    No, you cannot use the contraction "happiness'" for "happiness is". In general, you can only use the "'s" suffix in its verbal form on pronouns e.g. "he's", "she's", "it's", "who's".

    If you see the "'s" suffix on other words, it generally denotes possession, e.g. "the fox's glove", "the house's porch".



    Maybe in spoken English, you could get away with eliding the "is" into the double "s"es, but I've never heard anyone who isn't very drunk pronounce it that way ;) If you did add an apostrophe to the end, because "happiness" is a noun, it would imply possession, which doesn't make much sense.



    If you want to avoid the "to be" verb, you could use this construction




    Happiness: only real when shared.




    However, in English it's hard to get away with writing a sentence without a verb. Lacking an action, because "happiness" is the subject, it's difficult to get around using "is" without getting weird sentences like the example






    share|improve this answer


























      1














      No, you cannot use the contraction "happiness'" for "happiness is". In general, you can only use the "'s" suffix in its verbal form on pronouns e.g. "he's", "she's", "it's", "who's".

      If you see the "'s" suffix on other words, it generally denotes possession, e.g. "the fox's glove", "the house's porch".



      Maybe in spoken English, you could get away with eliding the "is" into the double "s"es, but I've never heard anyone who isn't very drunk pronounce it that way ;) If you did add an apostrophe to the end, because "happiness" is a noun, it would imply possession, which doesn't make much sense.



      If you want to avoid the "to be" verb, you could use this construction




      Happiness: only real when shared.




      However, in English it's hard to get away with writing a sentence without a verb. Lacking an action, because "happiness" is the subject, it's difficult to get around using "is" without getting weird sentences like the example






      share|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        No, you cannot use the contraction "happiness'" for "happiness is". In general, you can only use the "'s" suffix in its verbal form on pronouns e.g. "he's", "she's", "it's", "who's".

        If you see the "'s" suffix on other words, it generally denotes possession, e.g. "the fox's glove", "the house's porch".



        Maybe in spoken English, you could get away with eliding the "is" into the double "s"es, but I've never heard anyone who isn't very drunk pronounce it that way ;) If you did add an apostrophe to the end, because "happiness" is a noun, it would imply possession, which doesn't make much sense.



        If you want to avoid the "to be" verb, you could use this construction




        Happiness: only real when shared.




        However, in English it's hard to get away with writing a sentence without a verb. Lacking an action, because "happiness" is the subject, it's difficult to get around using "is" without getting weird sentences like the example






        share|improve this answer












        No, you cannot use the contraction "happiness'" for "happiness is". In general, you can only use the "'s" suffix in its verbal form on pronouns e.g. "he's", "she's", "it's", "who's".

        If you see the "'s" suffix on other words, it generally denotes possession, e.g. "the fox's glove", "the house's porch".



        Maybe in spoken English, you could get away with eliding the "is" into the double "s"es, but I've never heard anyone who isn't very drunk pronounce it that way ;) If you did add an apostrophe to the end, because "happiness" is a noun, it would imply possession, which doesn't make much sense.



        If you want to avoid the "to be" verb, you could use this construction




        Happiness: only real when shared.




        However, in English it's hard to get away with writing a sentence without a verb. Lacking an action, because "happiness" is the subject, it's difficult to get around using "is" without getting weird sentences like the example







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 18 at 22:11









        Zaya

        4177




        4177