Pattern match on inner trait cannot be checked at run time?
I tried pattern matching on an inner trait but it looks like this cannot be done. It also matches inner trait instances from other objects. It matches only inner (abstract) classes.
I cannot find why an inner trait cannot be checked at run time. Any suggestions?
With the code below I get this warning for 'def patternMatchA1': 'The outer reference in this type test cannot be checked at run time.'
trait A0
case class X() {
trait A1 extends A0
case class A() extends A1
def patternMatchA1(a: A0) = a match {
case a: A1 => true //The outer reference in this type test cannot be checked at run time.
case _ => false
}
def patternMatchA(a: A0) = a match {
case a: A => true
case _ => false
}
}
val Xa = X()
val Xb = X()
Xa.patternMatchA1(Xa.A()) //true
Xa.patternMatchA1(Xb.A()) //true -> I expected this to be false
Xa.patternMatchA(Xa.A()) //true
Xa.patternMatchA(Xb.A()) //false
scastie: https://scastie.scala-lang.org/gj2Tb6QaShiNNeRMMliwsQ
scala pattern-matching
add a comment |
I tried pattern matching on an inner trait but it looks like this cannot be done. It also matches inner trait instances from other objects. It matches only inner (abstract) classes.
I cannot find why an inner trait cannot be checked at run time. Any suggestions?
With the code below I get this warning for 'def patternMatchA1': 'The outer reference in this type test cannot be checked at run time.'
trait A0
case class X() {
trait A1 extends A0
case class A() extends A1
def patternMatchA1(a: A0) = a match {
case a: A1 => true //The outer reference in this type test cannot be checked at run time.
case _ => false
}
def patternMatchA(a: A0) = a match {
case a: A => true
case _ => false
}
}
val Xa = X()
val Xb = X()
Xa.patternMatchA1(Xa.A()) //true
Xa.patternMatchA1(Xb.A()) //true -> I expected this to be false
Xa.patternMatchA(Xa.A()) //true
Xa.patternMatchA(Xb.A()) //false
scastie: https://scastie.scala-lang.org/gj2Tb6QaShiNNeRMMliwsQ
scala pattern-matching
why it should be false? it is only false ifa
it's not anA1
which clearly is
– RoberMP
Nov 20 '18 at 9:19
1
It should be false, just like the second case. This code is supposed to test path dependent types. But there is some limitation in the compiler.
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:29
1
Maybe related to issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4440 ?
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:34
add a comment |
I tried pattern matching on an inner trait but it looks like this cannot be done. It also matches inner trait instances from other objects. It matches only inner (abstract) classes.
I cannot find why an inner trait cannot be checked at run time. Any suggestions?
With the code below I get this warning for 'def patternMatchA1': 'The outer reference in this type test cannot be checked at run time.'
trait A0
case class X() {
trait A1 extends A0
case class A() extends A1
def patternMatchA1(a: A0) = a match {
case a: A1 => true //The outer reference in this type test cannot be checked at run time.
case _ => false
}
def patternMatchA(a: A0) = a match {
case a: A => true
case _ => false
}
}
val Xa = X()
val Xb = X()
Xa.patternMatchA1(Xa.A()) //true
Xa.patternMatchA1(Xb.A()) //true -> I expected this to be false
Xa.patternMatchA(Xa.A()) //true
Xa.patternMatchA(Xb.A()) //false
scastie: https://scastie.scala-lang.org/gj2Tb6QaShiNNeRMMliwsQ
scala pattern-matching
I tried pattern matching on an inner trait but it looks like this cannot be done. It also matches inner trait instances from other objects. It matches only inner (abstract) classes.
I cannot find why an inner trait cannot be checked at run time. Any suggestions?
With the code below I get this warning for 'def patternMatchA1': 'The outer reference in this type test cannot be checked at run time.'
trait A0
case class X() {
trait A1 extends A0
case class A() extends A1
def patternMatchA1(a: A0) = a match {
case a: A1 => true //The outer reference in this type test cannot be checked at run time.
case _ => false
}
def patternMatchA(a: A0) = a match {
case a: A => true
case _ => false
}
}
val Xa = X()
val Xb = X()
Xa.patternMatchA1(Xa.A()) //true
Xa.patternMatchA1(Xb.A()) //true -> I expected this to be false
Xa.patternMatchA(Xa.A()) //true
Xa.patternMatchA(Xb.A()) //false
scastie: https://scastie.scala-lang.org/gj2Tb6QaShiNNeRMMliwsQ
scala pattern-matching
scala pattern-matching
asked Nov 20 '18 at 8:28
user3508638
7516
7516
why it should be false? it is only false ifa
it's not anA1
which clearly is
– RoberMP
Nov 20 '18 at 9:19
1
It should be false, just like the second case. This code is supposed to test path dependent types. But there is some limitation in the compiler.
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:29
1
Maybe related to issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4440 ?
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:34
add a comment |
why it should be false? it is only false ifa
it's not anA1
which clearly is
– RoberMP
Nov 20 '18 at 9:19
1
It should be false, just like the second case. This code is supposed to test path dependent types. But there is some limitation in the compiler.
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:29
1
Maybe related to issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4440 ?
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:34
why it should be false? it is only false if
a
it's not an A1
which clearly is– RoberMP
Nov 20 '18 at 9:19
why it should be false? it is only false if
a
it's not an A1
which clearly is– RoberMP
Nov 20 '18 at 9:19
1
1
It should be false, just like the second case. This code is supposed to test path dependent types. But there is some limitation in the compiler.
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:29
It should be false, just like the second case. This code is supposed to test path dependent types. But there is some limitation in the compiler.
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:29
1
1
Maybe related to issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4440 ?
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:34
Maybe related to issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4440 ?
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:34
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53388919%2fpattern-match-on-inner-trait-cannot-be-checked-at-run-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53388919%2fpattern-match-on-inner-trait-cannot-be-checked-at-run-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
why it should be false? it is only false if
a
it's not anA1
which clearly is– RoberMP
Nov 20 '18 at 9:19
1
It should be false, just like the second case. This code is supposed to test path dependent types. But there is some limitation in the compiler.
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:29
1
Maybe related to issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4440 ?
– ygor
Nov 20 '18 at 9:34