Where is standard American English derived from?
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
I have a book that explains how to speak in standard American English (American Accent Training — Barron's).
What does the term standard American English refer to?
Is there a region in the United States of America that has a pronunciation similar, or closer to standard American English (in the same way standard Italian is derived from a dialect spoken in Tuscany)?
american-english
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
I have a book that explains how to speak in standard American English (American Accent Training — Barron's).
What does the term standard American English refer to?
Is there a region in the United States of America that has a pronunciation similar, or closer to standard American English (in the same way standard Italian is derived from a dialect spoken in Tuscany)?
american-english
From the answers so far, it turns out that there is no set 'Standard' that can be referenced for the purpose of defining Standard AmE. Or is it?
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:54
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
up vote
13
down vote
favorite
I have a book that explains how to speak in standard American English (American Accent Training — Barron's).
What does the term standard American English refer to?
Is there a region in the United States of America that has a pronunciation similar, or closer to standard American English (in the same way standard Italian is derived from a dialect spoken in Tuscany)?
american-english
I have a book that explains how to speak in standard American English (American Accent Training — Barron's).
What does the term standard American English refer to?
Is there a region in the United States of America that has a pronunciation similar, or closer to standard American English (in the same way standard Italian is derived from a dialect spoken in Tuscany)?
american-english
american-english
edited Oct 19 '12 at 6:27
coleopterist
26.3k2399185
26.3k2399185
asked Aug 24 '10 at 20:39
kiamlaluno
43.3k56180295
43.3k56180295
From the answers so far, it turns out that there is no set 'Standard' that can be referenced for the purpose of defining Standard AmE. Or is it?
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:54
add a comment |
From the answers so far, it turns out that there is no set 'Standard' that can be referenced for the purpose of defining Standard AmE. Or is it?
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:54
From the answers so far, it turns out that there is no set 'Standard' that can be referenced for the purpose of defining Standard AmE. Or is it?
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:54
From the answers so far, it turns out that there is no set 'Standard' that can be referenced for the purpose of defining Standard AmE. Or is it?
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:54
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
25
down vote
accepted
“Standard” American English (SAE), when used to describe accents, is identical to the term “General American English”, and means American English spoken without any clear regional dialect markers. Sociolinguists tell us that this means essentially English spoken in the north midlands region, like Iowa, but in reality it is spoken all over the country, even in places where many people speak with what others would describe as “heavy” or “thick” accents. SAE is the English used by most television and radio broadcasters—that is, those who don’t speak with an identifiable regional accent.
In truth, a “standard” American accent is defined more by what it isn’t than what it is. It does not have the Northern Cities Vowel Shift, New England non-rhoticity, features of New York English, or any of the phonological features of Southern American English.
There is some debate as to whether speakers with or without the cot-caught merger (that is, whether or not the words cot and caught are pronounced differently) are speaking SAE, but most would consider that not a defining characteristic of SAE.
+1 for a “standard” American accent is defined more by why it isn’t than what it is.
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:52
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Some people will point to the Midwest as the location where Standard American English is spoken. But, most dialectology work has found that there is no region without a regional accent (for example see the Atlas of North American English).
For the most part, when your average commentator, or even a linguist, refers to Standard American English, what they mean is "speech which has no salient regional or dialectal markers." That is, Standard American English is largely negatively defined. There is no x
such that Standard English sounds like x
. Rather there is a
, b
and c
such that Standard English does not sound like a
, b
or c
.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
First of all (as an American), I have no idea what "standard American" means--there are distinct regionalisms, but no one of them is "standard." While it's probably not disputed that there's an American dialect (usage, spelling, etc.), there's no "standard" American accent.
Off the top of my head, I can think of a number of regional accents (Northeastern, Southern, Midwestern) that can be broken down further (Texas has an accent that is distinct from a deep Southern accent, even though both can be called "Southern"; Boston is known for its non-rhotic "r" sounds, but the same type of non-rhoticity can be found throughout northern New England).
As other answers have stated, there are distinct markers that identify particular regions that, when none are present, the speaker could be said to be speaking "without an accent".
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I agree with the general answers. However, I would say that the Omaha, Nebraska area, would come to the closest thing we have to a geographic area where Standard American English (accent) is natively spoken. Having said that, there are hundreds of other places, from Ohio to Colorado to Seattle, where no "accent" that really identifies the place is evident (unless an intentionally regional expression is employed).
(Oh, and I am not from Omaha. I am from Wisconsin, where, though considered the MidWest, we definitely do have an identifiable "accent." :)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I've noticed that when people speak of "standard" American English, "No regional markers" generally unpacks as "no mergers that create homophones" such as cot/caught.
SAE is sometimes described as newsreader dialect on national TV. These guys have a functional requirement for maximum intelligibility over all dialect areas.
So I think there is principled a way of describing Standard American. It's how you speak when you express every vowel distinction in any dialect and don't drop consonants (in particular no non-rhotic dialect is ever described as SAE).
As others have pointed out, North Midlands without the recent Northern Cities Vowel shift is a common referent for SAE. So is the upper-middle-class (but not working-class) dialect in Philadelphia, where I live. Someone pointed out Nebraska which works too as long as it's a version without cot/caught merger.
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
25
down vote
accepted
“Standard” American English (SAE), when used to describe accents, is identical to the term “General American English”, and means American English spoken without any clear regional dialect markers. Sociolinguists tell us that this means essentially English spoken in the north midlands region, like Iowa, but in reality it is spoken all over the country, even in places where many people speak with what others would describe as “heavy” or “thick” accents. SAE is the English used by most television and radio broadcasters—that is, those who don’t speak with an identifiable regional accent.
In truth, a “standard” American accent is defined more by what it isn’t than what it is. It does not have the Northern Cities Vowel Shift, New England non-rhoticity, features of New York English, or any of the phonological features of Southern American English.
There is some debate as to whether speakers with or without the cot-caught merger (that is, whether or not the words cot and caught are pronounced differently) are speaking SAE, but most would consider that not a defining characteristic of SAE.
+1 for a “standard” American accent is defined more by why it isn’t than what it is.
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:52
add a comment |
up vote
25
down vote
accepted
“Standard” American English (SAE), when used to describe accents, is identical to the term “General American English”, and means American English spoken without any clear regional dialect markers. Sociolinguists tell us that this means essentially English spoken in the north midlands region, like Iowa, but in reality it is spoken all over the country, even in places where many people speak with what others would describe as “heavy” or “thick” accents. SAE is the English used by most television and radio broadcasters—that is, those who don’t speak with an identifiable regional accent.
In truth, a “standard” American accent is defined more by what it isn’t than what it is. It does not have the Northern Cities Vowel Shift, New England non-rhoticity, features of New York English, or any of the phonological features of Southern American English.
There is some debate as to whether speakers with or without the cot-caught merger (that is, whether or not the words cot and caught are pronounced differently) are speaking SAE, but most would consider that not a defining characteristic of SAE.
+1 for a “standard” American accent is defined more by why it isn’t than what it is.
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:52
add a comment |
up vote
25
down vote
accepted
up vote
25
down vote
accepted
“Standard” American English (SAE), when used to describe accents, is identical to the term “General American English”, and means American English spoken without any clear regional dialect markers. Sociolinguists tell us that this means essentially English spoken in the north midlands region, like Iowa, but in reality it is spoken all over the country, even in places where many people speak with what others would describe as “heavy” or “thick” accents. SAE is the English used by most television and radio broadcasters—that is, those who don’t speak with an identifiable regional accent.
In truth, a “standard” American accent is defined more by what it isn’t than what it is. It does not have the Northern Cities Vowel Shift, New England non-rhoticity, features of New York English, or any of the phonological features of Southern American English.
There is some debate as to whether speakers with or without the cot-caught merger (that is, whether or not the words cot and caught are pronounced differently) are speaking SAE, but most would consider that not a defining characteristic of SAE.
“Standard” American English (SAE), when used to describe accents, is identical to the term “General American English”, and means American English spoken without any clear regional dialect markers. Sociolinguists tell us that this means essentially English spoken in the north midlands region, like Iowa, but in reality it is spoken all over the country, even in places where many people speak with what others would describe as “heavy” or “thick” accents. SAE is the English used by most television and radio broadcasters—that is, those who don’t speak with an identifiable regional accent.
In truth, a “standard” American accent is defined more by what it isn’t than what it is. It does not have the Northern Cities Vowel Shift, New England non-rhoticity, features of New York English, or any of the phonological features of Southern American English.
There is some debate as to whether speakers with or without the cot-caught merger (that is, whether or not the words cot and caught are pronounced differently) are speaking SAE, but most would consider that not a defining characteristic of SAE.
edited Oct 21 '12 at 6:47
answered Aug 24 '10 at 20:48
nohat♦
59.6k12167236
59.6k12167236
+1 for a “standard” American accent is defined more by why it isn’t than what it is.
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:52
add a comment |
+1 for a “standard” American accent is defined more by why it isn’t than what it is.
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:52
+1 for a “standard” American accent is defined more by why it isn’t than what it is.
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:52
+1 for a “standard” American accent is defined more by why it isn’t than what it is.
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:52
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Some people will point to the Midwest as the location where Standard American English is spoken. But, most dialectology work has found that there is no region without a regional accent (for example see the Atlas of North American English).
For the most part, when your average commentator, or even a linguist, refers to Standard American English, what they mean is "speech which has no salient regional or dialectal markers." That is, Standard American English is largely negatively defined. There is no x
such that Standard English sounds like x
. Rather there is a
, b
and c
such that Standard English does not sound like a
, b
or c
.
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Some people will point to the Midwest as the location where Standard American English is spoken. But, most dialectology work has found that there is no region without a regional accent (for example see the Atlas of North American English).
For the most part, when your average commentator, or even a linguist, refers to Standard American English, what they mean is "speech which has no salient regional or dialectal markers." That is, Standard American English is largely negatively defined. There is no x
such that Standard English sounds like x
. Rather there is a
, b
and c
such that Standard English does not sound like a
, b
or c
.
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
Some people will point to the Midwest as the location where Standard American English is spoken. But, most dialectology work has found that there is no region without a regional accent (for example see the Atlas of North American English).
For the most part, when your average commentator, or even a linguist, refers to Standard American English, what they mean is "speech which has no salient regional or dialectal markers." That is, Standard American English is largely negatively defined. There is no x
such that Standard English sounds like x
. Rather there is a
, b
and c
such that Standard English does not sound like a
, b
or c
.
Some people will point to the Midwest as the location where Standard American English is spoken. But, most dialectology work has found that there is no region without a regional accent (for example see the Atlas of North American English).
For the most part, when your average commentator, or even a linguist, refers to Standard American English, what they mean is "speech which has no salient regional or dialectal markers." That is, Standard American English is largely negatively defined. There is no x
such that Standard English sounds like x
. Rather there is a
, b
and c
such that Standard English does not sound like a
, b
or c
.
answered Aug 24 '10 at 20:45
JoFrhwld
1,5541015
1,5541015
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
First of all (as an American), I have no idea what "standard American" means--there are distinct regionalisms, but no one of them is "standard." While it's probably not disputed that there's an American dialect (usage, spelling, etc.), there's no "standard" American accent.
Off the top of my head, I can think of a number of regional accents (Northeastern, Southern, Midwestern) that can be broken down further (Texas has an accent that is distinct from a deep Southern accent, even though both can be called "Southern"; Boston is known for its non-rhotic "r" sounds, but the same type of non-rhoticity can be found throughout northern New England).
As other answers have stated, there are distinct markers that identify particular regions that, when none are present, the speaker could be said to be speaking "without an accent".
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
First of all (as an American), I have no idea what "standard American" means--there are distinct regionalisms, but no one of them is "standard." While it's probably not disputed that there's an American dialect (usage, spelling, etc.), there's no "standard" American accent.
Off the top of my head, I can think of a number of regional accents (Northeastern, Southern, Midwestern) that can be broken down further (Texas has an accent that is distinct from a deep Southern accent, even though both can be called "Southern"; Boston is known for its non-rhotic "r" sounds, but the same type of non-rhoticity can be found throughout northern New England).
As other answers have stated, there are distinct markers that identify particular regions that, when none are present, the speaker could be said to be speaking "without an accent".
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
First of all (as an American), I have no idea what "standard American" means--there are distinct regionalisms, but no one of them is "standard." While it's probably not disputed that there's an American dialect (usage, spelling, etc.), there's no "standard" American accent.
Off the top of my head, I can think of a number of regional accents (Northeastern, Southern, Midwestern) that can be broken down further (Texas has an accent that is distinct from a deep Southern accent, even though both can be called "Southern"; Boston is known for its non-rhotic "r" sounds, but the same type of non-rhoticity can be found throughout northern New England).
As other answers have stated, there are distinct markers that identify particular regions that, when none are present, the speaker could be said to be speaking "without an accent".
First of all (as an American), I have no idea what "standard American" means--there are distinct regionalisms, but no one of them is "standard." While it's probably not disputed that there's an American dialect (usage, spelling, etc.), there's no "standard" American accent.
Off the top of my head, I can think of a number of regional accents (Northeastern, Southern, Midwestern) that can be broken down further (Texas has an accent that is distinct from a deep Southern accent, even though both can be called "Southern"; Boston is known for its non-rhotic "r" sounds, but the same type of non-rhoticity can be found throughout northern New England).
As other answers have stated, there are distinct markers that identify particular regions that, when none are present, the speaker could be said to be speaking "without an accent".
answered Aug 24 '10 at 20:58
Brendan Berg
1,37421114
1,37421114
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I agree with the general answers. However, I would say that the Omaha, Nebraska area, would come to the closest thing we have to a geographic area where Standard American English (accent) is natively spoken. Having said that, there are hundreds of other places, from Ohio to Colorado to Seattle, where no "accent" that really identifies the place is evident (unless an intentionally regional expression is employed).
(Oh, and I am not from Omaha. I am from Wisconsin, where, though considered the MidWest, we definitely do have an identifiable "accent." :)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I agree with the general answers. However, I would say that the Omaha, Nebraska area, would come to the closest thing we have to a geographic area where Standard American English (accent) is natively spoken. Having said that, there are hundreds of other places, from Ohio to Colorado to Seattle, where no "accent" that really identifies the place is evident (unless an intentionally regional expression is employed).
(Oh, and I am not from Omaha. I am from Wisconsin, where, though considered the MidWest, we definitely do have an identifiable "accent." :)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I agree with the general answers. However, I would say that the Omaha, Nebraska area, would come to the closest thing we have to a geographic area where Standard American English (accent) is natively spoken. Having said that, there are hundreds of other places, from Ohio to Colorado to Seattle, where no "accent" that really identifies the place is evident (unless an intentionally regional expression is employed).
(Oh, and I am not from Omaha. I am from Wisconsin, where, though considered the MidWest, we definitely do have an identifiable "accent." :)
I agree with the general answers. However, I would say that the Omaha, Nebraska area, would come to the closest thing we have to a geographic area where Standard American English (accent) is natively spoken. Having said that, there are hundreds of other places, from Ohio to Colorado to Seattle, where no "accent" that really identifies the place is evident (unless an intentionally regional expression is employed).
(Oh, and I am not from Omaha. I am from Wisconsin, where, though considered the MidWest, we definitely do have an identifiable "accent." :)
answered Aug 24 '17 at 4:08
D Keffer
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I've noticed that when people speak of "standard" American English, "No regional markers" generally unpacks as "no mergers that create homophones" such as cot/caught.
SAE is sometimes described as newsreader dialect on national TV. These guys have a functional requirement for maximum intelligibility over all dialect areas.
So I think there is principled a way of describing Standard American. It's how you speak when you express every vowel distinction in any dialect and don't drop consonants (in particular no non-rhotic dialect is ever described as SAE).
As others have pointed out, North Midlands without the recent Northern Cities Vowel shift is a common referent for SAE. So is the upper-middle-class (but not working-class) dialect in Philadelphia, where I live. Someone pointed out Nebraska which works too as long as it's a version without cot/caught merger.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I've noticed that when people speak of "standard" American English, "No regional markers" generally unpacks as "no mergers that create homophones" such as cot/caught.
SAE is sometimes described as newsreader dialect on national TV. These guys have a functional requirement for maximum intelligibility over all dialect areas.
So I think there is principled a way of describing Standard American. It's how you speak when you express every vowel distinction in any dialect and don't drop consonants (in particular no non-rhotic dialect is ever described as SAE).
As others have pointed out, North Midlands without the recent Northern Cities Vowel shift is a common referent for SAE. So is the upper-middle-class (but not working-class) dialect in Philadelphia, where I live. Someone pointed out Nebraska which works too as long as it's a version without cot/caught merger.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I've noticed that when people speak of "standard" American English, "No regional markers" generally unpacks as "no mergers that create homophones" such as cot/caught.
SAE is sometimes described as newsreader dialect on national TV. These guys have a functional requirement for maximum intelligibility over all dialect areas.
So I think there is principled a way of describing Standard American. It's how you speak when you express every vowel distinction in any dialect and don't drop consonants (in particular no non-rhotic dialect is ever described as SAE).
As others have pointed out, North Midlands without the recent Northern Cities Vowel shift is a common referent for SAE. So is the upper-middle-class (but not working-class) dialect in Philadelphia, where I live. Someone pointed out Nebraska which works too as long as it's a version without cot/caught merger.
I've noticed that when people speak of "standard" American English, "No regional markers" generally unpacks as "no mergers that create homophones" such as cot/caught.
SAE is sometimes described as newsreader dialect on national TV. These guys have a functional requirement for maximum intelligibility over all dialect areas.
So I think there is principled a way of describing Standard American. It's how you speak when you express every vowel distinction in any dialect and don't drop consonants (in particular no non-rhotic dialect is ever described as SAE).
As others have pointed out, North Midlands without the recent Northern Cities Vowel shift is a common referent for SAE. So is the upper-middle-class (but not working-class) dialect in Philadelphia, where I live. Someone pointed out Nebraska which works too as long as it's a version without cot/caught merger.
answered Dec 8 at 12:20
ESR
32613
32613
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1884%2fwhere-is-standard-american-english-derived-from%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
From the answers so far, it turns out that there is no set 'Standard' that can be referenced for the purpose of defining Standard AmE. Or is it?
– Kris
Oct 19 '12 at 7:54