grub2-install: error: /boot/efi doesn't look like an EFI partition on a fresh Gentoo install











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I need a Gentoo 13 machine to test some software on the platform. I'm not a Gentoo regular, so I'm suffering their install procedures. I'm at
Configuring the bootloader | Installing GRUB2, and it failed with:



# grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --efi-directory=/boot
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: /boot doesn't look like an EFI partition.


I backtracked to Preparing the disks | Default: Using parted to partition the disk, and it appears I have things setup as instructed:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # parted
GNU Parted 3.2
Using /dev/sda
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) unit mb
(parted) print
Model: ATA VMware Virtual I (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 21475MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 1.05MB 3.15MB 2.10MB grub bios_grub
2 3.15MB 131MB 128MB ext2 boot boot, esp
3 131MB 2572MB 2441MB linux-swap(v1) swap msftdata
4 2572MB 21474MB 18902MB ext4 rootfs msftdata


The results above are from the same chapter of the manual, sections Applying a filesystem to a partition and Activating the swap partition.



I also followed the comment EFI directory should not be /boot but /boot/efi from Bootloader problems and questions on the Gentoo forums, but it resulted in the same error:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # mkdir /boot/efi
(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: /boot/efi doesn't look like an EFI partition.


What's the problem and how do I fix it?





Here's the corresponding fdisk view of the information presented by gparted above.



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # fdisk -l
Disk /dev/loop0: 3.3 GiB, 3567640576 bytes, 6968048 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/sda: 20 GiB, 21474836480 bytes, 41943040 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 52F5571A-808B-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXX

Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/sda1 2048 6143 4096 2M BIOS boot
/dev/sda2 6144 255999 249856 122M EFI System
/dev/sda3 256000 5023743 4767744 2.3G Microsoft basic data
/dev/sda4 5023744 41940991 36917248 17.6G Microsoft basic data




I also verified the package sys-boot/grub supports EFI:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # cat /etc/portage/make.conf | grep GRUB
GRUB_PLATFORMS="emu efi-32 efi-64 pc"


I then performed an emerge --ask --newuse sys-boot/grub, emerge -pv sys-boot/grub, and then rebuilt grub.










share|improve this question
























  • Try mkdir, then rebooting, and executing grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi
    – Joseph A.
    Mar 15 '16 at 23:46










  • @bytec0de - Thanks. If I reboot, then the machine won't boot because it won't have a boot loader. I'd feel much better about the current OS in a state it can proceed. How do I force a re-read of the disk partitions (is that what needs to be done)?
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 0:02












  • @bytec0de - I tried the reboot, but it won't reboot. The error message is "operating system not found". Can I ask you... did you know what the problem was, or were you guessing? The best I can tell, two days worth of work is now gone...
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 1:37










  • It was an educated guess @jww, which is why I commented.
    – Joseph A.
    Mar 16 '16 at 13:23

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I need a Gentoo 13 machine to test some software on the platform. I'm not a Gentoo regular, so I'm suffering their install procedures. I'm at
Configuring the bootloader | Installing GRUB2, and it failed with:



# grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --efi-directory=/boot
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: /boot doesn't look like an EFI partition.


I backtracked to Preparing the disks | Default: Using parted to partition the disk, and it appears I have things setup as instructed:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # parted
GNU Parted 3.2
Using /dev/sda
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) unit mb
(parted) print
Model: ATA VMware Virtual I (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 21475MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 1.05MB 3.15MB 2.10MB grub bios_grub
2 3.15MB 131MB 128MB ext2 boot boot, esp
3 131MB 2572MB 2441MB linux-swap(v1) swap msftdata
4 2572MB 21474MB 18902MB ext4 rootfs msftdata


The results above are from the same chapter of the manual, sections Applying a filesystem to a partition and Activating the swap partition.



I also followed the comment EFI directory should not be /boot but /boot/efi from Bootloader problems and questions on the Gentoo forums, but it resulted in the same error:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # mkdir /boot/efi
(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: /boot/efi doesn't look like an EFI partition.


What's the problem and how do I fix it?





Here's the corresponding fdisk view of the information presented by gparted above.



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # fdisk -l
Disk /dev/loop0: 3.3 GiB, 3567640576 bytes, 6968048 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/sda: 20 GiB, 21474836480 bytes, 41943040 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 52F5571A-808B-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXX

Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/sda1 2048 6143 4096 2M BIOS boot
/dev/sda2 6144 255999 249856 122M EFI System
/dev/sda3 256000 5023743 4767744 2.3G Microsoft basic data
/dev/sda4 5023744 41940991 36917248 17.6G Microsoft basic data




I also verified the package sys-boot/grub supports EFI:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # cat /etc/portage/make.conf | grep GRUB
GRUB_PLATFORMS="emu efi-32 efi-64 pc"


I then performed an emerge --ask --newuse sys-boot/grub, emerge -pv sys-boot/grub, and then rebuilt grub.










share|improve this question
























  • Try mkdir, then rebooting, and executing grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi
    – Joseph A.
    Mar 15 '16 at 23:46










  • @bytec0de - Thanks. If I reboot, then the machine won't boot because it won't have a boot loader. I'd feel much better about the current OS in a state it can proceed. How do I force a re-read of the disk partitions (is that what needs to be done)?
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 0:02












  • @bytec0de - I tried the reboot, but it won't reboot. The error message is "operating system not found". Can I ask you... did you know what the problem was, or were you guessing? The best I can tell, two days worth of work is now gone...
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 1:37










  • It was an educated guess @jww, which is why I commented.
    – Joseph A.
    Mar 16 '16 at 13:23















up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I need a Gentoo 13 machine to test some software on the platform. I'm not a Gentoo regular, so I'm suffering their install procedures. I'm at
Configuring the bootloader | Installing GRUB2, and it failed with:



# grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --efi-directory=/boot
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: /boot doesn't look like an EFI partition.


I backtracked to Preparing the disks | Default: Using parted to partition the disk, and it appears I have things setup as instructed:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # parted
GNU Parted 3.2
Using /dev/sda
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) unit mb
(parted) print
Model: ATA VMware Virtual I (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 21475MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 1.05MB 3.15MB 2.10MB grub bios_grub
2 3.15MB 131MB 128MB ext2 boot boot, esp
3 131MB 2572MB 2441MB linux-swap(v1) swap msftdata
4 2572MB 21474MB 18902MB ext4 rootfs msftdata


The results above are from the same chapter of the manual, sections Applying a filesystem to a partition and Activating the swap partition.



I also followed the comment EFI directory should not be /boot but /boot/efi from Bootloader problems and questions on the Gentoo forums, but it resulted in the same error:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # mkdir /boot/efi
(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: /boot/efi doesn't look like an EFI partition.


What's the problem and how do I fix it?





Here's the corresponding fdisk view of the information presented by gparted above.



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # fdisk -l
Disk /dev/loop0: 3.3 GiB, 3567640576 bytes, 6968048 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/sda: 20 GiB, 21474836480 bytes, 41943040 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 52F5571A-808B-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXX

Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/sda1 2048 6143 4096 2M BIOS boot
/dev/sda2 6144 255999 249856 122M EFI System
/dev/sda3 256000 5023743 4767744 2.3G Microsoft basic data
/dev/sda4 5023744 41940991 36917248 17.6G Microsoft basic data




I also verified the package sys-boot/grub supports EFI:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # cat /etc/portage/make.conf | grep GRUB
GRUB_PLATFORMS="emu efi-32 efi-64 pc"


I then performed an emerge --ask --newuse sys-boot/grub, emerge -pv sys-boot/grub, and then rebuilt grub.










share|improve this question















I need a Gentoo 13 machine to test some software on the platform. I'm not a Gentoo regular, so I'm suffering their install procedures. I'm at
Configuring the bootloader | Installing GRUB2, and it failed with:



# grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --efi-directory=/boot
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: /boot doesn't look like an EFI partition.


I backtracked to Preparing the disks | Default: Using parted to partition the disk, and it appears I have things setup as instructed:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # parted
GNU Parted 3.2
Using /dev/sda
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) unit mb
(parted) print
Model: ATA VMware Virtual I (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 21475MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 1.05MB 3.15MB 2.10MB grub bios_grub
2 3.15MB 131MB 128MB ext2 boot boot, esp
3 131MB 2572MB 2441MB linux-swap(v1) swap msftdata
4 2572MB 21474MB 18902MB ext4 rootfs msftdata


The results above are from the same chapter of the manual, sections Applying a filesystem to a partition and Activating the swap partition.



I also followed the comment EFI directory should not be /boot but /boot/efi from Bootloader problems and questions on the Gentoo forums, but it resulted in the same error:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # mkdir /boot/efi
(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
grub2-install: error: /boot/efi doesn't look like an EFI partition.


What's the problem and how do I fix it?





Here's the corresponding fdisk view of the information presented by gparted above.



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # fdisk -l
Disk /dev/loop0: 3.3 GiB, 3567640576 bytes, 6968048 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/sda: 20 GiB, 21474836480 bytes, 41943040 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 52F5571A-808B-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXX

Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/sda1 2048 6143 4096 2M BIOS boot
/dev/sda2 6144 255999 249856 122M EFI System
/dev/sda3 256000 5023743 4767744 2.3G Microsoft basic data
/dev/sda4 5023744 41940991 36917248 17.6G Microsoft basic data




I also verified the package sys-boot/grub supports EFI:



(chroot) Gentoo-2012 / # cat /etc/portage/make.conf | grep GRUB
GRUB_PLATFORMS="emu efi-32 efi-64 pc"


I then performed an emerge --ask --newuse sys-boot/grub, emerge -pv sys-boot/grub, and then rebuilt grub.







linux partitioning grub2 gentoo






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 16 '16 at 1:30

























asked Mar 15 '16 at 23:42









jww

4,1332373143




4,1332373143












  • Try mkdir, then rebooting, and executing grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi
    – Joseph A.
    Mar 15 '16 at 23:46










  • @bytec0de - Thanks. If I reboot, then the machine won't boot because it won't have a boot loader. I'd feel much better about the current OS in a state it can proceed. How do I force a re-read of the disk partitions (is that what needs to be done)?
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 0:02












  • @bytec0de - I tried the reboot, but it won't reboot. The error message is "operating system not found". Can I ask you... did you know what the problem was, or were you guessing? The best I can tell, two days worth of work is now gone...
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 1:37










  • It was an educated guess @jww, which is why I commented.
    – Joseph A.
    Mar 16 '16 at 13:23




















  • Try mkdir, then rebooting, and executing grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi
    – Joseph A.
    Mar 15 '16 at 23:46










  • @bytec0de - Thanks. If I reboot, then the machine won't boot because it won't have a boot loader. I'd feel much better about the current OS in a state it can proceed. How do I force a re-read of the disk partitions (is that what needs to be done)?
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 0:02












  • @bytec0de - I tried the reboot, but it won't reboot. The error message is "operating system not found". Can I ask you... did you know what the problem was, or were you guessing? The best I can tell, two days worth of work is now gone...
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 1:37










  • It was an educated guess @jww, which is why I commented.
    – Joseph A.
    Mar 16 '16 at 13:23


















Try mkdir, then rebooting, and executing grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi
– Joseph A.
Mar 15 '16 at 23:46




Try mkdir, then rebooting, and executing grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi
– Joseph A.
Mar 15 '16 at 23:46












@bytec0de - Thanks. If I reboot, then the machine won't boot because it won't have a boot loader. I'd feel much better about the current OS in a state it can proceed. How do I force a re-read of the disk partitions (is that what needs to be done)?
– jww
Mar 16 '16 at 0:02






@bytec0de - Thanks. If I reboot, then the machine won't boot because it won't have a boot loader. I'd feel much better about the current OS in a state it can proceed. How do I force a re-read of the disk partitions (is that what needs to be done)?
– jww
Mar 16 '16 at 0:02














@bytec0de - I tried the reboot, but it won't reboot. The error message is "operating system not found". Can I ask you... did you know what the problem was, or were you guessing? The best I can tell, two days worth of work is now gone...
– jww
Mar 16 '16 at 1:37




@bytec0de - I tried the reboot, but it won't reboot. The error message is "operating system not found". Can I ask you... did you know what the problem was, or were you guessing? The best I can tell, two days worth of work is now gone...
– jww
Mar 16 '16 at 1:37












It was an educated guess @jww, which is why I commented.
– Joseph A.
Mar 16 '16 at 13:23






It was an educated guess @jww, which is why I commented.
– Joseph A.
Mar 16 '16 at 13:23












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













The answer is simple. EFI System Partition (ESP) should be FAT32 (FAT16 or even FAT12 will also do for most proper UEFI; they are mostly shown as vfat in Linux) instead of ext2:



mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2


FWIW, if you are not going to install grub i386-pc (for BIOS/CSM boot), you don't need the "BIOS boot" partition. It is only required by grub i386-pc (but not grub x86_64-efi or i386-efi) on GPT.



It doesn't really matter whether you use the ESP for /boot. If you do, you should run:



grub2-install --efi-directory /boot


If you mount it on /boot/efi instead, then you should run:



grub2-install --efi-directory /boot/efi


--boot-directory /boot is implied (i.e. default); It doesn't matter whether /boot is the ESP, another separate partition, or a directory on the / filesystem.



You may not even need to chroot again to perform grub2-install; For example, you mounted sda4, your partition for /, on /mnt; AND THEN, mounted sda2, your ESP, on /mnt/boot/efi, then you can simply run:



grub2-install --boot-directory /mnt/boot --efi-directory /mnt/boot/efi


Although grub2-mkconfig needs to be run in chroot AFAIK. But if you plan on writing a simple and clean grub.cfg yourself instead (which is the only graceful way to use grub2), then this will be out of your concern.






share|improve this answer























  • Thanks Tom. It looks like their manual is pretty much broken in this area. Let me try some of these things and get back to you.
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 3:18










  • Thanks again Tom. I performed the mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2. I mounted things again as per the manual, and I was able to run grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi/ with some warnings. grub2-install completed with "Installation finished. No error reported." However, it does not boot, and produces an error "operating system not found". No wonder these guys don't produce a LiveCD that performs an installation. Based on their instructions, it can't be done.
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 3:58












  • As per the manual? What does that mean? Tell the mount commands you ran IN ORDER. Also considering the params you used, have you chrooted? Usually you can't really ignore "warnings" from grub2-install, so please show what exactly they are.
    – Tom Yan
    Mar 16 '16 at 4:00












  • Thanks again Tom. Sorry about that; I thought you were familiar with the procedures. The disks were mounted according to Preparing the disks | Mounting. Chroot was entered according to Installing the Gentoo base system | Mounting the necessary filesystems. I had to Chroot because I got an error without it. The error was "grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/modinfo.sh doesn't exist."
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 4:15










  • It's not about the "procedures" or whether I am familiar with them. It's HOW YOU mounted YOUR devices. So did you mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/gentoo; mount /dev/sda2 /mnt/gentoo/boot/efi in this ORDER and chroot to /mnt/gentoo? Again, what were the warnings you mentioned?
    – Tom Yan
    Mar 16 '16 at 4:20




















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










The problem seemed to be mixing and matching BIOS, EFI, MBR, and GPT. I tried to follow the guides and use the GPT, but there were some dependencies that I could not resolve because I am too inexperienced. Its not even clear to me the kernel was built with GPT support (via config option CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION).



When I dropped GPT and EFI and switched to purely BIOS and MBR, I was able to boot the resulting machine. BIOS and GPT are supposed to be a valid combination, but I'm wondering if it works in practice (see, for example, Bootloader Options).



Here's the configuration I was able to run the machine with:



$ parted
GNU Parted 3.2
Using /dev/sda
(parted) print
Model: ATA VMware Virtual I (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 21.5GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 135MB 134MB primary ext2 boot
2 135MB 19.5GB 19.3GB primary ext4
3 19.5GB 21.5GB 2012MB primary linux-swap(v1)


Partition 1 is /boot, Partition 2 is /, and Partition 3 is swap.






share|improve this answer





















  • You don't even necessarily need GPT for a standard-conforming UEFI, and you were able to mount partitions on a GPT disk. You just didn't have grub's EFI binary successfully registered in your UEFI's NVRAM, as the warnings of grub2-install clearly told you. And no matter what the reason is, --removable should be able to help you out (unless its sharing a Windows's ESP).
    – Tom Yan
    Mar 18 '16 at 7:07




















up vote
0
down vote













I just had this issue and found that /boot existed but didn't have my boot partition mounted to it. Just had to mount the boot partition to fix this



mnt /dev/sda1 /boot





share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1053388%2fgrub2-install-error-boot-efi-doesnt-look-like-an-efi-partition-on-a-fresh-ge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote













    The answer is simple. EFI System Partition (ESP) should be FAT32 (FAT16 or even FAT12 will also do for most proper UEFI; they are mostly shown as vfat in Linux) instead of ext2:



    mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2


    FWIW, if you are not going to install grub i386-pc (for BIOS/CSM boot), you don't need the "BIOS boot" partition. It is only required by grub i386-pc (but not grub x86_64-efi or i386-efi) on GPT.



    It doesn't really matter whether you use the ESP for /boot. If you do, you should run:



    grub2-install --efi-directory /boot


    If you mount it on /boot/efi instead, then you should run:



    grub2-install --efi-directory /boot/efi


    --boot-directory /boot is implied (i.e. default); It doesn't matter whether /boot is the ESP, another separate partition, or a directory on the / filesystem.



    You may not even need to chroot again to perform grub2-install; For example, you mounted sda4, your partition for /, on /mnt; AND THEN, mounted sda2, your ESP, on /mnt/boot/efi, then you can simply run:



    grub2-install --boot-directory /mnt/boot --efi-directory /mnt/boot/efi


    Although grub2-mkconfig needs to be run in chroot AFAIK. But if you plan on writing a simple and clean grub.cfg yourself instead (which is the only graceful way to use grub2), then this will be out of your concern.






    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks Tom. It looks like their manual is pretty much broken in this area. Let me try some of these things and get back to you.
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 3:18










    • Thanks again Tom. I performed the mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2. I mounted things again as per the manual, and I was able to run grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi/ with some warnings. grub2-install completed with "Installation finished. No error reported." However, it does not boot, and produces an error "operating system not found". No wonder these guys don't produce a LiveCD that performs an installation. Based on their instructions, it can't be done.
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 3:58












    • As per the manual? What does that mean? Tell the mount commands you ran IN ORDER. Also considering the params you used, have you chrooted? Usually you can't really ignore "warnings" from grub2-install, so please show what exactly they are.
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:00












    • Thanks again Tom. Sorry about that; I thought you were familiar with the procedures. The disks were mounted according to Preparing the disks | Mounting. Chroot was entered according to Installing the Gentoo base system | Mounting the necessary filesystems. I had to Chroot because I got an error without it. The error was "grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/modinfo.sh doesn't exist."
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:15










    • It's not about the "procedures" or whether I am familiar with them. It's HOW YOU mounted YOUR devices. So did you mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/gentoo; mount /dev/sda2 /mnt/gentoo/boot/efi in this ORDER and chroot to /mnt/gentoo? Again, what were the warnings you mentioned?
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:20

















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    The answer is simple. EFI System Partition (ESP) should be FAT32 (FAT16 or even FAT12 will also do for most proper UEFI; they are mostly shown as vfat in Linux) instead of ext2:



    mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2


    FWIW, if you are not going to install grub i386-pc (for BIOS/CSM boot), you don't need the "BIOS boot" partition. It is only required by grub i386-pc (but not grub x86_64-efi or i386-efi) on GPT.



    It doesn't really matter whether you use the ESP for /boot. If you do, you should run:



    grub2-install --efi-directory /boot


    If you mount it on /boot/efi instead, then you should run:



    grub2-install --efi-directory /boot/efi


    --boot-directory /boot is implied (i.e. default); It doesn't matter whether /boot is the ESP, another separate partition, or a directory on the / filesystem.



    You may not even need to chroot again to perform grub2-install; For example, you mounted sda4, your partition for /, on /mnt; AND THEN, mounted sda2, your ESP, on /mnt/boot/efi, then you can simply run:



    grub2-install --boot-directory /mnt/boot --efi-directory /mnt/boot/efi


    Although grub2-mkconfig needs to be run in chroot AFAIK. But if you plan on writing a simple and clean grub.cfg yourself instead (which is the only graceful way to use grub2), then this will be out of your concern.






    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks Tom. It looks like their manual is pretty much broken in this area. Let me try some of these things and get back to you.
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 3:18










    • Thanks again Tom. I performed the mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2. I mounted things again as per the manual, and I was able to run grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi/ with some warnings. grub2-install completed with "Installation finished. No error reported." However, it does not boot, and produces an error "operating system not found". No wonder these guys don't produce a LiveCD that performs an installation. Based on their instructions, it can't be done.
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 3:58












    • As per the manual? What does that mean? Tell the mount commands you ran IN ORDER. Also considering the params you used, have you chrooted? Usually you can't really ignore "warnings" from grub2-install, so please show what exactly they are.
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:00












    • Thanks again Tom. Sorry about that; I thought you were familiar with the procedures. The disks were mounted according to Preparing the disks | Mounting. Chroot was entered according to Installing the Gentoo base system | Mounting the necessary filesystems. I had to Chroot because I got an error without it. The error was "grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/modinfo.sh doesn't exist."
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:15










    • It's not about the "procedures" or whether I am familiar with them. It's HOW YOU mounted YOUR devices. So did you mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/gentoo; mount /dev/sda2 /mnt/gentoo/boot/efi in this ORDER and chroot to /mnt/gentoo? Again, what were the warnings you mentioned?
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:20















    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    The answer is simple. EFI System Partition (ESP) should be FAT32 (FAT16 or even FAT12 will also do for most proper UEFI; they are mostly shown as vfat in Linux) instead of ext2:



    mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2


    FWIW, if you are not going to install grub i386-pc (for BIOS/CSM boot), you don't need the "BIOS boot" partition. It is only required by grub i386-pc (but not grub x86_64-efi or i386-efi) on GPT.



    It doesn't really matter whether you use the ESP for /boot. If you do, you should run:



    grub2-install --efi-directory /boot


    If you mount it on /boot/efi instead, then you should run:



    grub2-install --efi-directory /boot/efi


    --boot-directory /boot is implied (i.e. default); It doesn't matter whether /boot is the ESP, another separate partition, or a directory on the / filesystem.



    You may not even need to chroot again to perform grub2-install; For example, you mounted sda4, your partition for /, on /mnt; AND THEN, mounted sda2, your ESP, on /mnt/boot/efi, then you can simply run:



    grub2-install --boot-directory /mnt/boot --efi-directory /mnt/boot/efi


    Although grub2-mkconfig needs to be run in chroot AFAIK. But if you plan on writing a simple and clean grub.cfg yourself instead (which is the only graceful way to use grub2), then this will be out of your concern.






    share|improve this answer














    The answer is simple. EFI System Partition (ESP) should be FAT32 (FAT16 or even FAT12 will also do for most proper UEFI; they are mostly shown as vfat in Linux) instead of ext2:



    mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2


    FWIW, if you are not going to install grub i386-pc (for BIOS/CSM boot), you don't need the "BIOS boot" partition. It is only required by grub i386-pc (but not grub x86_64-efi or i386-efi) on GPT.



    It doesn't really matter whether you use the ESP for /boot. If you do, you should run:



    grub2-install --efi-directory /boot


    If you mount it on /boot/efi instead, then you should run:



    grub2-install --efi-directory /boot/efi


    --boot-directory /boot is implied (i.e. default); It doesn't matter whether /boot is the ESP, another separate partition, or a directory on the / filesystem.



    You may not even need to chroot again to perform grub2-install; For example, you mounted sda4, your partition for /, on /mnt; AND THEN, mounted sda2, your ESP, on /mnt/boot/efi, then you can simply run:



    grub2-install --boot-directory /mnt/boot --efi-directory /mnt/boot/efi


    Although grub2-mkconfig needs to be run in chroot AFAIK. But if you plan on writing a simple and clean grub.cfg yourself instead (which is the only graceful way to use grub2), then this will be out of your concern.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jul 27 '16 at 18:11







    user140967

















    answered Mar 16 '16 at 3:05









    Tom Yan

    3,1301618




    3,1301618












    • Thanks Tom. It looks like their manual is pretty much broken in this area. Let me try some of these things and get back to you.
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 3:18










    • Thanks again Tom. I performed the mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2. I mounted things again as per the manual, and I was able to run grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi/ with some warnings. grub2-install completed with "Installation finished. No error reported." However, it does not boot, and produces an error "operating system not found". No wonder these guys don't produce a LiveCD that performs an installation. Based on their instructions, it can't be done.
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 3:58












    • As per the manual? What does that mean? Tell the mount commands you ran IN ORDER. Also considering the params you used, have you chrooted? Usually you can't really ignore "warnings" from grub2-install, so please show what exactly they are.
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:00












    • Thanks again Tom. Sorry about that; I thought you were familiar with the procedures. The disks were mounted according to Preparing the disks | Mounting. Chroot was entered according to Installing the Gentoo base system | Mounting the necessary filesystems. I had to Chroot because I got an error without it. The error was "grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/modinfo.sh doesn't exist."
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:15










    • It's not about the "procedures" or whether I am familiar with them. It's HOW YOU mounted YOUR devices. So did you mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/gentoo; mount /dev/sda2 /mnt/gentoo/boot/efi in this ORDER and chroot to /mnt/gentoo? Again, what were the warnings you mentioned?
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:20




















    • Thanks Tom. It looks like their manual is pretty much broken in this area. Let me try some of these things and get back to you.
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 3:18










    • Thanks again Tom. I performed the mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2. I mounted things again as per the manual, and I was able to run grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi/ with some warnings. grub2-install completed with "Installation finished. No error reported." However, it does not boot, and produces an error "operating system not found". No wonder these guys don't produce a LiveCD that performs an installation. Based on their instructions, it can't be done.
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 3:58












    • As per the manual? What does that mean? Tell the mount commands you ran IN ORDER. Also considering the params you used, have you chrooted? Usually you can't really ignore "warnings" from grub2-install, so please show what exactly they are.
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:00












    • Thanks again Tom. Sorry about that; I thought you were familiar with the procedures. The disks were mounted according to Preparing the disks | Mounting. Chroot was entered according to Installing the Gentoo base system | Mounting the necessary filesystems. I had to Chroot because I got an error without it. The error was "grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/modinfo.sh doesn't exist."
      – jww
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:15










    • It's not about the "procedures" or whether I am familiar with them. It's HOW YOU mounted YOUR devices. So did you mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/gentoo; mount /dev/sda2 /mnt/gentoo/boot/efi in this ORDER and chroot to /mnt/gentoo? Again, what were the warnings you mentioned?
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 16 '16 at 4:20


















    Thanks Tom. It looks like their manual is pretty much broken in this area. Let me try some of these things and get back to you.
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 3:18




    Thanks Tom. It looks like their manual is pretty much broken in this area. Let me try some of these things and get back to you.
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 3:18












    Thanks again Tom. I performed the mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2. I mounted things again as per the manual, and I was able to run grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi/ with some warnings. grub2-install completed with "Installation finished. No error reported." However, it does not boot, and produces an error "operating system not found". No wonder these guys don't produce a LiveCD that performs an installation. Based on their instructions, it can't be done.
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 3:58






    Thanks again Tom. I performed the mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2. I mounted things again as per the manual, and I was able to run grub2-install --target=x86_64-efi --boot-directory=/boot --efi-directory=/boot/efi/ with some warnings. grub2-install completed with "Installation finished. No error reported." However, it does not boot, and produces an error "operating system not found". No wonder these guys don't produce a LiveCD that performs an installation. Based on their instructions, it can't be done.
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 3:58














    As per the manual? What does that mean? Tell the mount commands you ran IN ORDER. Also considering the params you used, have you chrooted? Usually you can't really ignore "warnings" from grub2-install, so please show what exactly they are.
    – Tom Yan
    Mar 16 '16 at 4:00






    As per the manual? What does that mean? Tell the mount commands you ran IN ORDER. Also considering the params you used, have you chrooted? Usually you can't really ignore "warnings" from grub2-install, so please show what exactly they are.
    – Tom Yan
    Mar 16 '16 at 4:00














    Thanks again Tom. Sorry about that; I thought you were familiar with the procedures. The disks were mounted according to Preparing the disks | Mounting. Chroot was entered according to Installing the Gentoo base system | Mounting the necessary filesystems. I had to Chroot because I got an error without it. The error was "grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/modinfo.sh doesn't exist."
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 4:15




    Thanks again Tom. Sorry about that; I thought you were familiar with the procedures. The disks were mounted according to Preparing the disks | Mounting. Chroot was entered according to Installing the Gentoo base system | Mounting the necessary filesystems. I had to Chroot because I got an error without it. The error was "grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/modinfo.sh doesn't exist."
    – jww
    Mar 16 '16 at 4:15












    It's not about the "procedures" or whether I am familiar with them. It's HOW YOU mounted YOUR devices. So did you mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/gentoo; mount /dev/sda2 /mnt/gentoo/boot/efi in this ORDER and chroot to /mnt/gentoo? Again, what were the warnings you mentioned?
    – Tom Yan
    Mar 16 '16 at 4:20






    It's not about the "procedures" or whether I am familiar with them. It's HOW YOU mounted YOUR devices. So did you mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/gentoo; mount /dev/sda2 /mnt/gentoo/boot/efi in this ORDER and chroot to /mnt/gentoo? Again, what were the warnings you mentioned?
    – Tom Yan
    Mar 16 '16 at 4:20














    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    The problem seemed to be mixing and matching BIOS, EFI, MBR, and GPT. I tried to follow the guides and use the GPT, but there were some dependencies that I could not resolve because I am too inexperienced. Its not even clear to me the kernel was built with GPT support (via config option CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION).



    When I dropped GPT and EFI and switched to purely BIOS and MBR, I was able to boot the resulting machine. BIOS and GPT are supposed to be a valid combination, but I'm wondering if it works in practice (see, for example, Bootloader Options).



    Here's the configuration I was able to run the machine with:



    $ parted
    GNU Parted 3.2
    Using /dev/sda
    (parted) print
    Model: ATA VMware Virtual I (scsi)
    Disk /dev/sda: 21.5GB
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
    Partition Table: msdos
    Disk Flags:

    Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
    1 1049kB 135MB 134MB primary ext2 boot
    2 135MB 19.5GB 19.3GB primary ext4
    3 19.5GB 21.5GB 2012MB primary linux-swap(v1)


    Partition 1 is /boot, Partition 2 is /, and Partition 3 is swap.






    share|improve this answer





















    • You don't even necessarily need GPT for a standard-conforming UEFI, and you were able to mount partitions on a GPT disk. You just didn't have grub's EFI binary successfully registered in your UEFI's NVRAM, as the warnings of grub2-install clearly told you. And no matter what the reason is, --removable should be able to help you out (unless its sharing a Windows's ESP).
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 18 '16 at 7:07

















    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    The problem seemed to be mixing and matching BIOS, EFI, MBR, and GPT. I tried to follow the guides and use the GPT, but there were some dependencies that I could not resolve because I am too inexperienced. Its not even clear to me the kernel was built with GPT support (via config option CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION).



    When I dropped GPT and EFI and switched to purely BIOS and MBR, I was able to boot the resulting machine. BIOS and GPT are supposed to be a valid combination, but I'm wondering if it works in practice (see, for example, Bootloader Options).



    Here's the configuration I was able to run the machine with:



    $ parted
    GNU Parted 3.2
    Using /dev/sda
    (parted) print
    Model: ATA VMware Virtual I (scsi)
    Disk /dev/sda: 21.5GB
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
    Partition Table: msdos
    Disk Flags:

    Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
    1 1049kB 135MB 134MB primary ext2 boot
    2 135MB 19.5GB 19.3GB primary ext4
    3 19.5GB 21.5GB 2012MB primary linux-swap(v1)


    Partition 1 is /boot, Partition 2 is /, and Partition 3 is swap.






    share|improve this answer





















    • You don't even necessarily need GPT for a standard-conforming UEFI, and you were able to mount partitions on a GPT disk. You just didn't have grub's EFI binary successfully registered in your UEFI's NVRAM, as the warnings of grub2-install clearly told you. And no matter what the reason is, --removable should be able to help you out (unless its sharing a Windows's ESP).
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 18 '16 at 7:07















    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted






    The problem seemed to be mixing and matching BIOS, EFI, MBR, and GPT. I tried to follow the guides and use the GPT, but there were some dependencies that I could not resolve because I am too inexperienced. Its not even clear to me the kernel was built with GPT support (via config option CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION).



    When I dropped GPT and EFI and switched to purely BIOS and MBR, I was able to boot the resulting machine. BIOS and GPT are supposed to be a valid combination, but I'm wondering if it works in practice (see, for example, Bootloader Options).



    Here's the configuration I was able to run the machine with:



    $ parted
    GNU Parted 3.2
    Using /dev/sda
    (parted) print
    Model: ATA VMware Virtual I (scsi)
    Disk /dev/sda: 21.5GB
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
    Partition Table: msdos
    Disk Flags:

    Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
    1 1049kB 135MB 134MB primary ext2 boot
    2 135MB 19.5GB 19.3GB primary ext4
    3 19.5GB 21.5GB 2012MB primary linux-swap(v1)


    Partition 1 is /boot, Partition 2 is /, and Partition 3 is swap.






    share|improve this answer












    The problem seemed to be mixing and matching BIOS, EFI, MBR, and GPT. I tried to follow the guides and use the GPT, but there were some dependencies that I could not resolve because I am too inexperienced. Its not even clear to me the kernel was built with GPT support (via config option CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION).



    When I dropped GPT and EFI and switched to purely BIOS and MBR, I was able to boot the resulting machine. BIOS and GPT are supposed to be a valid combination, but I'm wondering if it works in practice (see, for example, Bootloader Options).



    Here's the configuration I was able to run the machine with:



    $ parted
    GNU Parted 3.2
    Using /dev/sda
    (parted) print
    Model: ATA VMware Virtual I (scsi)
    Disk /dev/sda: 21.5GB
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
    Partition Table: msdos
    Disk Flags:

    Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
    1 1049kB 135MB 134MB primary ext2 boot
    2 135MB 19.5GB 19.3GB primary ext4
    3 19.5GB 21.5GB 2012MB primary linux-swap(v1)


    Partition 1 is /boot, Partition 2 is /, and Partition 3 is swap.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 18 '16 at 3:19









    jww

    4,1332373143




    4,1332373143












    • You don't even necessarily need GPT for a standard-conforming UEFI, and you were able to mount partitions on a GPT disk. You just didn't have grub's EFI binary successfully registered in your UEFI's NVRAM, as the warnings of grub2-install clearly told you. And no matter what the reason is, --removable should be able to help you out (unless its sharing a Windows's ESP).
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 18 '16 at 7:07




















    • You don't even necessarily need GPT for a standard-conforming UEFI, and you were able to mount partitions on a GPT disk. You just didn't have grub's EFI binary successfully registered in your UEFI's NVRAM, as the warnings of grub2-install clearly told you. And no matter what the reason is, --removable should be able to help you out (unless its sharing a Windows's ESP).
      – Tom Yan
      Mar 18 '16 at 7:07


















    You don't even necessarily need GPT for a standard-conforming UEFI, and you were able to mount partitions on a GPT disk. You just didn't have grub's EFI binary successfully registered in your UEFI's NVRAM, as the warnings of grub2-install clearly told you. And no matter what the reason is, --removable should be able to help you out (unless its sharing a Windows's ESP).
    – Tom Yan
    Mar 18 '16 at 7:07






    You don't even necessarily need GPT for a standard-conforming UEFI, and you were able to mount partitions on a GPT disk. You just didn't have grub's EFI binary successfully registered in your UEFI's NVRAM, as the warnings of grub2-install clearly told you. And no matter what the reason is, --removable should be able to help you out (unless its sharing a Windows's ESP).
    – Tom Yan
    Mar 18 '16 at 7:07












    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I just had this issue and found that /boot existed but didn't have my boot partition mounted to it. Just had to mount the boot partition to fix this



    mnt /dev/sda1 /boot





    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      I just had this issue and found that /boot existed but didn't have my boot partition mounted to it. Just had to mount the boot partition to fix this



      mnt /dev/sda1 /boot





      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        I just had this issue and found that /boot existed but didn't have my boot partition mounted to it. Just had to mount the boot partition to fix this



        mnt /dev/sda1 /boot





        share|improve this answer












        I just had this issue and found that /boot existed but didn't have my boot partition mounted to it. Just had to mount the boot partition to fix this



        mnt /dev/sda1 /boot






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 29 at 23:47









        glitchyme

        1364




        1364






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1053388%2fgrub2-install-error-boot-efi-doesnt-look-like-an-efi-partition-on-a-fresh-ge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

            Alcedinidae

            Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?