Enable/Disable the kafka binding in spring cloud stream using properties












0















Is there any property that enables/disables the kafka binding in spring cloud stream . I would like to leave the kafka binder inclusion in the the pom.xml but would like to disable/enable the kafka binding optionally in production . if there is no such property available , appreciate any pointers to achieve this (perhaps via some java configuration or @Conditional* annotations) .



Why do we need this :



We are migrating one of our application from a oracle db/JMS infrastructure to Mongo/Kafka infrastructure. WE will be running both of these version of the app in parallel for sometime for validation. We are maintaining the same source base for both ,by having separate dao and controller layers and keeping a common service layer. The idea is to deploy both versions of the app generated from the same source base (current and migrated) and run them parallel for sometime for validation. When we do that current version need not be aware of any kafka/mongo connection parameters and migrated version need not be aware of any oracle/JMS connection paramters . We are able achieve this for oracle/mongo using service binding and @Conditional* annotations . But for the Spring cloud stream for kafka we are using the following properties which always requires valid parameters where the kafka connection can be made.




  • spring.cloud.stream.kafka.binder.brokers


  • spring.cloud.stream.kafka.binder.zkNodes











share|improve this question

























  • I am still struggling to understand what would such an application do in prod if it is not bound to anything? Is there something else that the application does? And if so, why are you pairing the "something else" which is out of scope of spring-cloud-stream architecturally together with messaging code which is in scope of spring-cloud-stream? I am just trying to understand your architecture.

    – Oleg Zhurakousky
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:28











  • The requirement is elaborated in the question . I hope that clarifies your question @oleg-zhurakousky

    – Jimmi Skaria
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:02











  • I see. . . You can probably tinker with overrides as well, or may be simply remove the binder dependency all together for the time being. At this point I guess it is safe to say the framework was not designed with that use case in mind especially given the "opinionated" paradigms adopted from boot. Consider raising an issue in spring-cloud-stream Github and we can continue this discussion there and if we want to consider adding it as a feature.

    – Oleg Zhurakousky
    Nov 21 '18 at 18:50











  • A feature request is created in github

    – Jimmi Skaria
    Nov 27 '18 at 22:44


















0















Is there any property that enables/disables the kafka binding in spring cloud stream . I would like to leave the kafka binder inclusion in the the pom.xml but would like to disable/enable the kafka binding optionally in production . if there is no such property available , appreciate any pointers to achieve this (perhaps via some java configuration or @Conditional* annotations) .



Why do we need this :



We are migrating one of our application from a oracle db/JMS infrastructure to Mongo/Kafka infrastructure. WE will be running both of these version of the app in parallel for sometime for validation. We are maintaining the same source base for both ,by having separate dao and controller layers and keeping a common service layer. The idea is to deploy both versions of the app generated from the same source base (current and migrated) and run them parallel for sometime for validation. When we do that current version need not be aware of any kafka/mongo connection parameters and migrated version need not be aware of any oracle/JMS connection paramters . We are able achieve this for oracle/mongo using service binding and @Conditional* annotations . But for the Spring cloud stream for kafka we are using the following properties which always requires valid parameters where the kafka connection can be made.




  • spring.cloud.stream.kafka.binder.brokers


  • spring.cloud.stream.kafka.binder.zkNodes











share|improve this question

























  • I am still struggling to understand what would such an application do in prod if it is not bound to anything? Is there something else that the application does? And if so, why are you pairing the "something else" which is out of scope of spring-cloud-stream architecturally together with messaging code which is in scope of spring-cloud-stream? I am just trying to understand your architecture.

    – Oleg Zhurakousky
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:28











  • The requirement is elaborated in the question . I hope that clarifies your question @oleg-zhurakousky

    – Jimmi Skaria
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:02











  • I see. . . You can probably tinker with overrides as well, or may be simply remove the binder dependency all together for the time being. At this point I guess it is safe to say the framework was not designed with that use case in mind especially given the "opinionated" paradigms adopted from boot. Consider raising an issue in spring-cloud-stream Github and we can continue this discussion there and if we want to consider adding it as a feature.

    – Oleg Zhurakousky
    Nov 21 '18 at 18:50











  • A feature request is created in github

    – Jimmi Skaria
    Nov 27 '18 at 22:44
















0












0








0








Is there any property that enables/disables the kafka binding in spring cloud stream . I would like to leave the kafka binder inclusion in the the pom.xml but would like to disable/enable the kafka binding optionally in production . if there is no such property available , appreciate any pointers to achieve this (perhaps via some java configuration or @Conditional* annotations) .



Why do we need this :



We are migrating one of our application from a oracle db/JMS infrastructure to Mongo/Kafka infrastructure. WE will be running both of these version of the app in parallel for sometime for validation. We are maintaining the same source base for both ,by having separate dao and controller layers and keeping a common service layer. The idea is to deploy both versions of the app generated from the same source base (current and migrated) and run them parallel for sometime for validation. When we do that current version need not be aware of any kafka/mongo connection parameters and migrated version need not be aware of any oracle/JMS connection paramters . We are able achieve this for oracle/mongo using service binding and @Conditional* annotations . But for the Spring cloud stream for kafka we are using the following properties which always requires valid parameters where the kafka connection can be made.




  • spring.cloud.stream.kafka.binder.brokers


  • spring.cloud.stream.kafka.binder.zkNodes











share|improve this question
















Is there any property that enables/disables the kafka binding in spring cloud stream . I would like to leave the kafka binder inclusion in the the pom.xml but would like to disable/enable the kafka binding optionally in production . if there is no such property available , appreciate any pointers to achieve this (perhaps via some java configuration or @Conditional* annotations) .



Why do we need this :



We are migrating one of our application from a oracle db/JMS infrastructure to Mongo/Kafka infrastructure. WE will be running both of these version of the app in parallel for sometime for validation. We are maintaining the same source base for both ,by having separate dao and controller layers and keeping a common service layer. The idea is to deploy both versions of the app generated from the same source base (current and migrated) and run them parallel for sometime for validation. When we do that current version need not be aware of any kafka/mongo connection parameters and migrated version need not be aware of any oracle/JMS connection paramters . We are able achieve this for oracle/mongo using service binding and @Conditional* annotations . But for the Spring cloud stream for kafka we are using the following properties which always requires valid parameters where the kafka connection can be made.




  • spring.cloud.stream.kafka.binder.brokers


  • spring.cloud.stream.kafka.binder.zkNodes








spring-cloud-stream spring-kafka






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '18 at 17:15







Jimmi Skaria

















asked Nov 21 '18 at 0:51









Jimmi SkariaJimmi Skaria

13




13













  • I am still struggling to understand what would such an application do in prod if it is not bound to anything? Is there something else that the application does? And if so, why are you pairing the "something else" which is out of scope of spring-cloud-stream architecturally together with messaging code which is in scope of spring-cloud-stream? I am just trying to understand your architecture.

    – Oleg Zhurakousky
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:28











  • The requirement is elaborated in the question . I hope that clarifies your question @oleg-zhurakousky

    – Jimmi Skaria
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:02











  • I see. . . You can probably tinker with overrides as well, or may be simply remove the binder dependency all together for the time being. At this point I guess it is safe to say the framework was not designed with that use case in mind especially given the "opinionated" paradigms adopted from boot. Consider raising an issue in spring-cloud-stream Github and we can continue this discussion there and if we want to consider adding it as a feature.

    – Oleg Zhurakousky
    Nov 21 '18 at 18:50











  • A feature request is created in github

    – Jimmi Skaria
    Nov 27 '18 at 22:44





















  • I am still struggling to understand what would such an application do in prod if it is not bound to anything? Is there something else that the application does? And if so, why are you pairing the "something else" which is out of scope of spring-cloud-stream architecturally together with messaging code which is in scope of spring-cloud-stream? I am just trying to understand your architecture.

    – Oleg Zhurakousky
    Nov 21 '18 at 7:28











  • The requirement is elaborated in the question . I hope that clarifies your question @oleg-zhurakousky

    – Jimmi Skaria
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:02











  • I see. . . You can probably tinker with overrides as well, or may be simply remove the binder dependency all together for the time being. At this point I guess it is safe to say the framework was not designed with that use case in mind especially given the "opinionated" paradigms adopted from boot. Consider raising an issue in spring-cloud-stream Github and we can continue this discussion there and if we want to consider adding it as a feature.

    – Oleg Zhurakousky
    Nov 21 '18 at 18:50











  • A feature request is created in github

    – Jimmi Skaria
    Nov 27 '18 at 22:44



















I am still struggling to understand what would such an application do in prod if it is not bound to anything? Is there something else that the application does? And if so, why are you pairing the "something else" which is out of scope of spring-cloud-stream architecturally together with messaging code which is in scope of spring-cloud-stream? I am just trying to understand your architecture.

– Oleg Zhurakousky
Nov 21 '18 at 7:28





I am still struggling to understand what would such an application do in prod if it is not bound to anything? Is there something else that the application does? And if so, why are you pairing the "something else" which is out of scope of spring-cloud-stream architecturally together with messaging code which is in scope of spring-cloud-stream? I am just trying to understand your architecture.

– Oleg Zhurakousky
Nov 21 '18 at 7:28













The requirement is elaborated in the question . I hope that clarifies your question @oleg-zhurakousky

– Jimmi Skaria
Nov 21 '18 at 17:02





The requirement is elaborated in the question . I hope that clarifies your question @oleg-zhurakousky

– Jimmi Skaria
Nov 21 '18 at 17:02













I see. . . You can probably tinker with overrides as well, or may be simply remove the binder dependency all together for the time being. At this point I guess it is safe to say the framework was not designed with that use case in mind especially given the "opinionated" paradigms adopted from boot. Consider raising an issue in spring-cloud-stream Github and we can continue this discussion there and if we want to consider adding it as a feature.

– Oleg Zhurakousky
Nov 21 '18 at 18:50





I see. . . You can probably tinker with overrides as well, or may be simply remove the binder dependency all together for the time being. At this point I guess it is safe to say the framework was not designed with that use case in mind especially given the "opinionated" paradigms adopted from boot. Consider raising an issue in spring-cloud-stream Github and we can continue this discussion there and if we want to consider adding it as a feature.

– Oleg Zhurakousky
Nov 21 '18 at 18:50













A feature request is created in github

– Jimmi Skaria
Nov 27 '18 at 22:44







A feature request is created in github

– Jimmi Skaria
Nov 27 '18 at 22:44














0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53403804%2fenable-disable-the-kafka-binding-in-spring-cloud-stream-using-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53403804%2fenable-disable-the-kafka-binding-in-spring-cloud-stream-using-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?