Functors in arrow category












4














I am studying Awodey's Category theory book. I have trouble understanding the following line:



Observe that there are two functors in arrow category i.e.
$$
begin{align}
mathscr{C} xleftarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{cod}} mathscr{C}
end{align}
$$

where $mathscr{C}^{rightarrow}$ is the arrow category corresponding to $mathscr{C}$.



They have not mentioned what these $textbf{dom}$ and $textbf{cod}$ are? How do we prove that these are functors?



My understanding:
Now, in the diagram given below:



enter image description here



$textbf{dom}:mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}$. So,



$[f:A to B] mapsto A $ (object mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$) and
if $g=(g_1,g_2):[f:A to B] to [f':A' to B'] $, then $(g_1,g_2) mapsto [f:A to B]$ (the morphism mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$ ).



Using this definition, If I proceed to prove the statement:
(a)
$$
textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')
$$



LHS = $f:A to B$ and RHS = $textbf{dom}(g): A to A'$ (which seems absurd)
I am not sure if this makes sense.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    2 days ago










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
    – MUH
    2 days ago
















4














I am studying Awodey's Category theory book. I have trouble understanding the following line:



Observe that there are two functors in arrow category i.e.
$$
begin{align}
mathscr{C} xleftarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{cod}} mathscr{C}
end{align}
$$

where $mathscr{C}^{rightarrow}$ is the arrow category corresponding to $mathscr{C}$.



They have not mentioned what these $textbf{dom}$ and $textbf{cod}$ are? How do we prove that these are functors?



My understanding:
Now, in the diagram given below:



enter image description here



$textbf{dom}:mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}$. So,



$[f:A to B] mapsto A $ (object mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$) and
if $g=(g_1,g_2):[f:A to B] to [f':A' to B'] $, then $(g_1,g_2) mapsto [f:A to B]$ (the morphism mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$ ).



Using this definition, If I proceed to prove the statement:
(a)
$$
textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')
$$



LHS = $f:A to B$ and RHS = $textbf{dom}(g): A to A'$ (which seems absurd)
I am not sure if this makes sense.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    2 days ago










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
    – MUH
    2 days ago














4












4








4







I am studying Awodey's Category theory book. I have trouble understanding the following line:



Observe that there are two functors in arrow category i.e.
$$
begin{align}
mathscr{C} xleftarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{cod}} mathscr{C}
end{align}
$$

where $mathscr{C}^{rightarrow}$ is the arrow category corresponding to $mathscr{C}$.



They have not mentioned what these $textbf{dom}$ and $textbf{cod}$ are? How do we prove that these are functors?



My understanding:
Now, in the diagram given below:



enter image description here



$textbf{dom}:mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}$. So,



$[f:A to B] mapsto A $ (object mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$) and
if $g=(g_1,g_2):[f:A to B] to [f':A' to B'] $, then $(g_1,g_2) mapsto [f:A to B]$ (the morphism mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$ ).



Using this definition, If I proceed to prove the statement:
(a)
$$
textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')
$$



LHS = $f:A to B$ and RHS = $textbf{dom}(g): A to A'$ (which seems absurd)
I am not sure if this makes sense.










share|cite|improve this question















I am studying Awodey's Category theory book. I have trouble understanding the following line:



Observe that there are two functors in arrow category i.e.
$$
begin{align}
mathscr{C} xleftarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{cod}} mathscr{C}
end{align}
$$

where $mathscr{C}^{rightarrow}$ is the arrow category corresponding to $mathscr{C}$.



They have not mentioned what these $textbf{dom}$ and $textbf{cod}$ are? How do we prove that these are functors?



My understanding:
Now, in the diagram given below:



enter image description here



$textbf{dom}:mathscr{C}^{rightarrow} xrightarrow{textbf{dom}} mathscr{C}$. So,



$[f:A to B] mapsto A $ (object mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$) and
if $g=(g_1,g_2):[f:A to B] to [f':A' to B'] $, then $(g_1,g_2) mapsto [f:A to B]$ (the morphism mapping of functor $textbf{dom}$ ).



Using this definition, If I proceed to prove the statement:
(a)
$$
textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')
$$



LHS = $f:A to B$ and RHS = $textbf{dom}(g): A to A'$ (which seems absurd)
I am not sure if this makes sense.







category-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago

























asked 2 days ago









MUH

395216




395216












  • domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    2 days ago










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
    – MUH
    2 days ago


















  • domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    2 days ago










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
    – MUH
    2 days ago
















domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
2 days ago




domain and codomain. Maps the arrow $f:Ato A'$ to $A$ and to $A'$ respectively.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
2 days ago












@LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
– MUH
2 days ago




@LordSharktheUnknown I am not able to prove even, first condition of functor i.e. $textbf{dom} ( g:f to f' ) = textbf{dom}(g): textbf{dom}(f) to textbf{dom}(f')$
– MUH
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Writing: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'tag1$$ where $f,f'$ are objects of arrow category $mathcal C^{to}$ and pair $(g_1,g_2)$ is an element of homset $mathcal C^{to}(f,f')$ represents a commuting diagram pictured in your question.



We have the functor $mathbf{dom}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{dom}fstackrel{g_1}{to}mathsf{dom}f']$$



And we have the functor $mathbf{cod}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{cod}fstackrel{g_2}{to}mathsf{cod}f']$$



In order to prove that $mathbf{dom}$ and $mathbf{cod}$ are functors it must be shown both of them respect identities and composition.



If $(1)$ stands for an identity then $f=f'$ and $g_1,g_2$ are both identities in $mathcal C$. This guarantees that identities are respected.



By composition we must expand $(1)$ to: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'text{ and }f'stackrel{(g'_1,g'_2)}{to}f''tag2$$with commuting squares.



Then we have: $$(g'_1,g'_2)circ(g_1,g_2)=(g'_1circ g_1,g'_2circ g_2)$$assuring that composition is respected.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    3














    The functor $mathbf{dom}$ takes the object $f$ to $A,$ the object $f'$ to $A';$ and takes the arrow $(g_1,g_2):fto f'$ to $g_1.$ Notice $g_1$ is an arrow $Ato A'$ as it should be.



    The identity morphism $mathrm{id}_f$ is simply $(mathrm{id}_A, mathrm{id}_{A'}),$ so $mathbf{dom}(mathrm{id}_f) = mathrm{id}_A$ as required.



    The composition of two morphisms $(g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)$ is $(g_1circ h_1, g_2circ h_2),$ as can be seen by drawing two commuting squares side by side. So $mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)) = g_1circ h_1 = mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2))circmathbf{dom}((h_1circ h_2))$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057510%2ffunctors-in-arrow-category%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      Writing: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'tag1$$ where $f,f'$ are objects of arrow category $mathcal C^{to}$ and pair $(g_1,g_2)$ is an element of homset $mathcal C^{to}(f,f')$ represents a commuting diagram pictured in your question.



      We have the functor $mathbf{dom}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{dom}fstackrel{g_1}{to}mathsf{dom}f']$$



      And we have the functor $mathbf{cod}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{cod}fstackrel{g_2}{to}mathsf{cod}f']$$



      In order to prove that $mathbf{dom}$ and $mathbf{cod}$ are functors it must be shown both of them respect identities and composition.



      If $(1)$ stands for an identity then $f=f'$ and $g_1,g_2$ are both identities in $mathcal C$. This guarantees that identities are respected.



      By composition we must expand $(1)$ to: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'text{ and }f'stackrel{(g'_1,g'_2)}{to}f''tag2$$with commuting squares.



      Then we have: $$(g'_1,g'_2)circ(g_1,g_2)=(g'_1circ g_1,g'_2circ g_2)$$assuring that composition is respected.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        3














        Writing: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'tag1$$ where $f,f'$ are objects of arrow category $mathcal C^{to}$ and pair $(g_1,g_2)$ is an element of homset $mathcal C^{to}(f,f')$ represents a commuting diagram pictured in your question.



        We have the functor $mathbf{dom}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{dom}fstackrel{g_1}{to}mathsf{dom}f']$$



        And we have the functor $mathbf{cod}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{cod}fstackrel{g_2}{to}mathsf{cod}f']$$



        In order to prove that $mathbf{dom}$ and $mathbf{cod}$ are functors it must be shown both of them respect identities and composition.



        If $(1)$ stands for an identity then $f=f'$ and $g_1,g_2$ are both identities in $mathcal C$. This guarantees that identities are respected.



        By composition we must expand $(1)$ to: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'text{ and }f'stackrel{(g'_1,g'_2)}{to}f''tag2$$with commuting squares.



        Then we have: $$(g'_1,g'_2)circ(g_1,g_2)=(g'_1circ g_1,g'_2circ g_2)$$assuring that composition is respected.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          3












          3








          3






          Writing: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'tag1$$ where $f,f'$ are objects of arrow category $mathcal C^{to}$ and pair $(g_1,g_2)$ is an element of homset $mathcal C^{to}(f,f')$ represents a commuting diagram pictured in your question.



          We have the functor $mathbf{dom}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{dom}fstackrel{g_1}{to}mathsf{dom}f']$$



          And we have the functor $mathbf{cod}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{cod}fstackrel{g_2}{to}mathsf{cod}f']$$



          In order to prove that $mathbf{dom}$ and $mathbf{cod}$ are functors it must be shown both of them respect identities and composition.



          If $(1)$ stands for an identity then $f=f'$ and $g_1,g_2$ are both identities in $mathcal C$. This guarantees that identities are respected.



          By composition we must expand $(1)$ to: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'text{ and }f'stackrel{(g'_1,g'_2)}{to}f''tag2$$with commuting squares.



          Then we have: $$(g'_1,g'_2)circ(g_1,g_2)=(g'_1circ g_1,g'_2circ g_2)$$assuring that composition is respected.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Writing: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'tag1$$ where $f,f'$ are objects of arrow category $mathcal C^{to}$ and pair $(g_1,g_2)$ is an element of homset $mathcal C^{to}(f,f')$ represents a commuting diagram pictured in your question.



          We have the functor $mathbf{dom}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{dom}fstackrel{g_1}{to}mathsf{dom}f']$$



          And we have the functor $mathbf{cod}:mathcal C^{to}tomathcal C$ prescribed by:$$[fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f']mapsto[mathsf{cod}fstackrel{g_2}{to}mathsf{cod}f']$$



          In order to prove that $mathbf{dom}$ and $mathbf{cod}$ are functors it must be shown both of them respect identities and composition.



          If $(1)$ stands for an identity then $f=f'$ and $g_1,g_2$ are both identities in $mathcal C$. This guarantees that identities are respected.



          By composition we must expand $(1)$ to: $$fstackrel{(g_1,g_2)}{to}f'text{ and }f'stackrel{(g'_1,g'_2)}{to}f''tag2$$with commuting squares.



          Then we have: $$(g'_1,g'_2)circ(g_1,g_2)=(g'_1circ g_1,g'_2circ g_2)$$assuring that composition is respected.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          drhab

          97.9k544129




          97.9k544129























              3














              The functor $mathbf{dom}$ takes the object $f$ to $A,$ the object $f'$ to $A';$ and takes the arrow $(g_1,g_2):fto f'$ to $g_1.$ Notice $g_1$ is an arrow $Ato A'$ as it should be.



              The identity morphism $mathrm{id}_f$ is simply $(mathrm{id}_A, mathrm{id}_{A'}),$ so $mathbf{dom}(mathrm{id}_f) = mathrm{id}_A$ as required.



              The composition of two morphisms $(g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)$ is $(g_1circ h_1, g_2circ h_2),$ as can be seen by drawing two commuting squares side by side. So $mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)) = g_1circ h_1 = mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2))circmathbf{dom}((h_1circ h_2))$






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                3














                The functor $mathbf{dom}$ takes the object $f$ to $A,$ the object $f'$ to $A';$ and takes the arrow $(g_1,g_2):fto f'$ to $g_1.$ Notice $g_1$ is an arrow $Ato A'$ as it should be.



                The identity morphism $mathrm{id}_f$ is simply $(mathrm{id}_A, mathrm{id}_{A'}),$ so $mathbf{dom}(mathrm{id}_f) = mathrm{id}_A$ as required.



                The composition of two morphisms $(g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)$ is $(g_1circ h_1, g_2circ h_2),$ as can be seen by drawing two commuting squares side by side. So $mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)) = g_1circ h_1 = mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2))circmathbf{dom}((h_1circ h_2))$






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  3












                  3








                  3






                  The functor $mathbf{dom}$ takes the object $f$ to $A,$ the object $f'$ to $A';$ and takes the arrow $(g_1,g_2):fto f'$ to $g_1.$ Notice $g_1$ is an arrow $Ato A'$ as it should be.



                  The identity morphism $mathrm{id}_f$ is simply $(mathrm{id}_A, mathrm{id}_{A'}),$ so $mathbf{dom}(mathrm{id}_f) = mathrm{id}_A$ as required.



                  The composition of two morphisms $(g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)$ is $(g_1circ h_1, g_2circ h_2),$ as can be seen by drawing two commuting squares side by side. So $mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)) = g_1circ h_1 = mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2))circmathbf{dom}((h_1circ h_2))$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  The functor $mathbf{dom}$ takes the object $f$ to $A,$ the object $f'$ to $A';$ and takes the arrow $(g_1,g_2):fto f'$ to $g_1.$ Notice $g_1$ is an arrow $Ato A'$ as it should be.



                  The identity morphism $mathrm{id}_f$ is simply $(mathrm{id}_A, mathrm{id}_{A'}),$ so $mathbf{dom}(mathrm{id}_f) = mathrm{id}_A$ as required.



                  The composition of two morphisms $(g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)$ is $(g_1circ h_1, g_2circ h_2),$ as can be seen by drawing two commuting squares side by side. So $mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2)circ (h_1,h_2)) = g_1circ h_1 = mathbf{dom}((g_1,g_2))circmathbf{dom}((h_1circ h_2))$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  spaceisdarkgreen

                  32.4k21753




                  32.4k21753






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057510%2ffunctors-in-arrow-category%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                      If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                      Alcedinidae