Kingdom Takeover [on hold]
There is an army that destroys and massacres most kingdoms (not all). It’s not for power, money, resources (including land) or slavery. Why would they do this?
magic science-fiction warfare alternate-history
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by Renan, elemtilas, L.Dutch♦ 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "You are asking questions about a story set in a world instead of about building a world. For more information, see Why is my question "Too Story Based" and how do I get it opened?." – Renan, elemtilas, L.Dutch
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
There is an army that destroys and massacres most kingdoms (not all). It’s not for power, money, resources (including land) or slavery. Why would they do this?
magic science-fiction warfare alternate-history
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by Renan, elemtilas, L.Dutch♦ 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "You are asking questions about a story set in a world instead of about building a world. For more information, see Why is my question "Too Story Based" and how do I get it opened?." – Renan, elemtilas, L.Dutch
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Most kingdoms are inhabited by a race which the army hates. Or the army wants something back these kingdoms took?
– Soan
Dec 31 '18 at 0:46
1
For the lulz, of course.
– Renan
2 days ago
Welcome to worldbuilding. You are asking about a motivation in your story, and giving no parameters to tell a good answer from a bad one. Please take the tour and visit the help center to understand our standards.
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
1
It has been proposed that "Why would X?" questions are off-topic for this site because they're almost never about the rules of your world.
– JBH
2 days ago
add a comment |
There is an army that destroys and massacres most kingdoms (not all). It’s not for power, money, resources (including land) or slavery. Why would they do this?
magic science-fiction warfare alternate-history
New contributor
There is an army that destroys and massacres most kingdoms (not all). It’s not for power, money, resources (including land) or slavery. Why would they do this?
magic science-fiction warfare alternate-history
magic science-fiction warfare alternate-history
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
New contributor
asked Dec 31 '18 at 0:29
user59876
92
92
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by Renan, elemtilas, L.Dutch♦ 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "You are asking questions about a story set in a world instead of about building a world. For more information, see Why is my question "Too Story Based" and how do I get it opened?." – Renan, elemtilas, L.Dutch
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by Renan, elemtilas, L.Dutch♦ 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "You are asking questions about a story set in a world instead of about building a world. For more information, see Why is my question "Too Story Based" and how do I get it opened?." – Renan, elemtilas, L.Dutch
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Most kingdoms are inhabited by a race which the army hates. Or the army wants something back these kingdoms took?
– Soan
Dec 31 '18 at 0:46
1
For the lulz, of course.
– Renan
2 days ago
Welcome to worldbuilding. You are asking about a motivation in your story, and giving no parameters to tell a good answer from a bad one. Please take the tour and visit the help center to understand our standards.
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
1
It has been proposed that "Why would X?" questions are off-topic for this site because they're almost never about the rules of your world.
– JBH
2 days ago
add a comment |
Most kingdoms are inhabited by a race which the army hates. Or the army wants something back these kingdoms took?
– Soan
Dec 31 '18 at 0:46
1
For the lulz, of course.
– Renan
2 days ago
Welcome to worldbuilding. You are asking about a motivation in your story, and giving no parameters to tell a good answer from a bad one. Please take the tour and visit the help center to understand our standards.
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
1
It has been proposed that "Why would X?" questions are off-topic for this site because they're almost never about the rules of your world.
– JBH
2 days ago
Most kingdoms are inhabited by a race which the army hates. Or the army wants something back these kingdoms took?
– Soan
Dec 31 '18 at 0:46
Most kingdoms are inhabited by a race which the army hates. Or the army wants something back these kingdoms took?
– Soan
Dec 31 '18 at 0:46
1
1
For the lulz, of course.
– Renan
2 days ago
For the lulz, of course.
– Renan
2 days ago
Welcome to worldbuilding. You are asking about a motivation in your story, and giving no parameters to tell a good answer from a bad one. Please take the tour and visit the help center to understand our standards.
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
Welcome to worldbuilding. You are asking about a motivation in your story, and giving no parameters to tell a good answer from a bad one. Please take the tour and visit the help center to understand our standards.
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
1
1
It has been proposed that "Why would X?" questions are off-topic for this site because they're almost never about the rules of your world.
– JBH
2 days ago
It has been proposed that "Why would X?" questions are off-topic for this site because they're almost never about the rules of your world.
– JBH
2 days ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Religion?
Different ideologies is always a great reason to get invaded and massacred and has been used throughout history. If your religion demands blood sacrifices, many war prisoners would be needed on a regular basis.
add a comment |
Sport.
Many of the animals in Africa are actively hunted for the sport of it. We kill them for nothing more than the opportunity to have our photo taken holding a rifle and standing beside something bigger and deader than us. Imagine an army that has so little regard for foreigners that they see them almost as another species, and see military conquest as a safari.
Such a culture in time would even end up with a hierarchical promotion model within their military based on gamification. To get to Corporal, you must make X kills, to get to Sergeant, Y kills, etc. In such an environment, war and massacre is actually required for advancement and as such, an army containing a sufficient percentage of ambitious soldiers will be constantly looking for new targets to satisfy the need for enemy bodies to fuel advancement.
The problem with such a model is stopping it. It would be voracious in its need for conquest and massacre, wouldn't consider the strategic benefit of lands or people, or even care too much about the state they represent. The enemy would be found everywhere simply because that's how the next rank is achieved.
add a comment |
If the leader/king/general of the army is evil, or somehow not in the right mindset (like they have psychopathic tendencies, etc.) then they could just be doing it because they're bored or something along those lines, like the way people hunt for sport and not for actual survival or need. Or it could be a show of power (although that could be similar to them doing it for power), like the leader and/or army is bragging of their unbeatableness/power.
New contributor
add a comment |
Purity.
People from other kingdoms are not like us and don't deserve to be treated as such. They sometimes come over to our land and infect our people with their evil ideas and poor choice of religion and different skin/hair/eye color (or other features) and make little half-breed babies.
We need to stop the infection at its source. Any kingdom that is not worthy of us will be destroyed. Sign up to do your duty, make your kills, and be assured of a place in the world to come.
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Religion?
Different ideologies is always a great reason to get invaded and massacred and has been used throughout history. If your religion demands blood sacrifices, many war prisoners would be needed on a regular basis.
add a comment |
Religion?
Different ideologies is always a great reason to get invaded and massacred and has been used throughout history. If your religion demands blood sacrifices, many war prisoners would be needed on a regular basis.
add a comment |
Religion?
Different ideologies is always a great reason to get invaded and massacred and has been used throughout history. If your religion demands blood sacrifices, many war prisoners would be needed on a regular basis.
Religion?
Different ideologies is always a great reason to get invaded and massacred and has been used throughout history. If your religion demands blood sacrifices, many war prisoners would be needed on a regular basis.
answered 2 days ago
Thorne
14.3k42041
14.3k42041
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sport.
Many of the animals in Africa are actively hunted for the sport of it. We kill them for nothing more than the opportunity to have our photo taken holding a rifle and standing beside something bigger and deader than us. Imagine an army that has so little regard for foreigners that they see them almost as another species, and see military conquest as a safari.
Such a culture in time would even end up with a hierarchical promotion model within their military based on gamification. To get to Corporal, you must make X kills, to get to Sergeant, Y kills, etc. In such an environment, war and massacre is actually required for advancement and as such, an army containing a sufficient percentage of ambitious soldiers will be constantly looking for new targets to satisfy the need for enemy bodies to fuel advancement.
The problem with such a model is stopping it. It would be voracious in its need for conquest and massacre, wouldn't consider the strategic benefit of lands or people, or even care too much about the state they represent. The enemy would be found everywhere simply because that's how the next rank is achieved.
add a comment |
Sport.
Many of the animals in Africa are actively hunted for the sport of it. We kill them for nothing more than the opportunity to have our photo taken holding a rifle and standing beside something bigger and deader than us. Imagine an army that has so little regard for foreigners that they see them almost as another species, and see military conquest as a safari.
Such a culture in time would even end up with a hierarchical promotion model within their military based on gamification. To get to Corporal, you must make X kills, to get to Sergeant, Y kills, etc. In such an environment, war and massacre is actually required for advancement and as such, an army containing a sufficient percentage of ambitious soldiers will be constantly looking for new targets to satisfy the need for enemy bodies to fuel advancement.
The problem with such a model is stopping it. It would be voracious in its need for conquest and massacre, wouldn't consider the strategic benefit of lands or people, or even care too much about the state they represent. The enemy would be found everywhere simply because that's how the next rank is achieved.
add a comment |
Sport.
Many of the animals in Africa are actively hunted for the sport of it. We kill them for nothing more than the opportunity to have our photo taken holding a rifle and standing beside something bigger and deader than us. Imagine an army that has so little regard for foreigners that they see them almost as another species, and see military conquest as a safari.
Such a culture in time would even end up with a hierarchical promotion model within their military based on gamification. To get to Corporal, you must make X kills, to get to Sergeant, Y kills, etc. In such an environment, war and massacre is actually required for advancement and as such, an army containing a sufficient percentage of ambitious soldiers will be constantly looking for new targets to satisfy the need for enemy bodies to fuel advancement.
The problem with such a model is stopping it. It would be voracious in its need for conquest and massacre, wouldn't consider the strategic benefit of lands or people, or even care too much about the state they represent. The enemy would be found everywhere simply because that's how the next rank is achieved.
Sport.
Many of the animals in Africa are actively hunted for the sport of it. We kill them for nothing more than the opportunity to have our photo taken holding a rifle and standing beside something bigger and deader than us. Imagine an army that has so little regard for foreigners that they see them almost as another species, and see military conquest as a safari.
Such a culture in time would even end up with a hierarchical promotion model within their military based on gamification. To get to Corporal, you must make X kills, to get to Sergeant, Y kills, etc. In such an environment, war and massacre is actually required for advancement and as such, an army containing a sufficient percentage of ambitious soldiers will be constantly looking for new targets to satisfy the need for enemy bodies to fuel advancement.
The problem with such a model is stopping it. It would be voracious in its need for conquest and massacre, wouldn't consider the strategic benefit of lands or people, or even care too much about the state they represent. The enemy would be found everywhere simply because that's how the next rank is achieved.
answered Dec 31 '18 at 1:41
Tim B II
25.2k656108
25.2k656108
add a comment |
add a comment |
If the leader/king/general of the army is evil, or somehow not in the right mindset (like they have psychopathic tendencies, etc.) then they could just be doing it because they're bored or something along those lines, like the way people hunt for sport and not for actual survival or need. Or it could be a show of power (although that could be similar to them doing it for power), like the leader and/or army is bragging of their unbeatableness/power.
New contributor
add a comment |
If the leader/king/general of the army is evil, or somehow not in the right mindset (like they have psychopathic tendencies, etc.) then they could just be doing it because they're bored or something along those lines, like the way people hunt for sport and not for actual survival or need. Or it could be a show of power (although that could be similar to them doing it for power), like the leader and/or army is bragging of their unbeatableness/power.
New contributor
add a comment |
If the leader/king/general of the army is evil, or somehow not in the right mindset (like they have psychopathic tendencies, etc.) then they could just be doing it because they're bored or something along those lines, like the way people hunt for sport and not for actual survival or need. Or it could be a show of power (although that could be similar to them doing it for power), like the leader and/or army is bragging of their unbeatableness/power.
New contributor
If the leader/king/general of the army is evil, or somehow not in the right mindset (like they have psychopathic tendencies, etc.) then they could just be doing it because they're bored or something along those lines, like the way people hunt for sport and not for actual survival or need. Or it could be a show of power (although that could be similar to them doing it for power), like the leader and/or army is bragging of their unbeatableness/power.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
imamthebi
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Purity.
People from other kingdoms are not like us and don't deserve to be treated as such. They sometimes come over to our land and infect our people with their evil ideas and poor choice of religion and different skin/hair/eye color (or other features) and make little half-breed babies.
We need to stop the infection at its source. Any kingdom that is not worthy of us will be destroyed. Sign up to do your duty, make your kills, and be assured of a place in the world to come.
add a comment |
Purity.
People from other kingdoms are not like us and don't deserve to be treated as such. They sometimes come over to our land and infect our people with their evil ideas and poor choice of religion and different skin/hair/eye color (or other features) and make little half-breed babies.
We need to stop the infection at its source. Any kingdom that is not worthy of us will be destroyed. Sign up to do your duty, make your kills, and be assured of a place in the world to come.
add a comment |
Purity.
People from other kingdoms are not like us and don't deserve to be treated as such. They sometimes come over to our land and infect our people with their evil ideas and poor choice of religion and different skin/hair/eye color (or other features) and make little half-breed babies.
We need to stop the infection at its source. Any kingdom that is not worthy of us will be destroyed. Sign up to do your duty, make your kills, and be assured of a place in the world to come.
Purity.
People from other kingdoms are not like us and don't deserve to be treated as such. They sometimes come over to our land and infect our people with their evil ideas and poor choice of religion and different skin/hair/eye color (or other features) and make little half-breed babies.
We need to stop the infection at its source. Any kingdom that is not worthy of us will be destroyed. Sign up to do your duty, make your kills, and be assured of a place in the world to come.
answered 2 days ago
Cyn
4,990833
4,990833
add a comment |
add a comment |
Most kingdoms are inhabited by a race which the army hates. Or the army wants something back these kingdoms took?
– Soan
Dec 31 '18 at 0:46
1
For the lulz, of course.
– Renan
2 days ago
Welcome to worldbuilding. You are asking about a motivation in your story, and giving no parameters to tell a good answer from a bad one. Please take the tour and visit the help center to understand our standards.
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
1
It has been proposed that "Why would X?" questions are off-topic for this site because they're almost never about the rules of your world.
– JBH
2 days ago