How to evaluate PEP-508-style platform markers?
I'd like to programmatically evaluate PEP-508-style platform markers such as platform_system == 'Windows'
. It's not terribly challenging to implement a parser, but I assume there is one in pip. What is it called and how can I import & use it in my own script?
python pip
add a comment |
I'd like to programmatically evaluate PEP-508-style platform markers such as platform_system == 'Windows'
. It's not terribly challenging to implement a parser, but I assume there is one in pip. What is it called and how can I import & use it in my own script?
python pip
pip does not have a public library API, and the pip devs don't want people importing & using the code in their own scripts. See the documentation for more information.
– jwodder
Nov 21 '18 at 17:58
Thanks for the heads-up. I kinda remembered that and since I'm controlling the whole environment, I'm fine with ignoring that.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 21 '18 at 18:08
add a comment |
I'd like to programmatically evaluate PEP-508-style platform markers such as platform_system == 'Windows'
. It's not terribly challenging to implement a parser, but I assume there is one in pip. What is it called and how can I import & use it in my own script?
python pip
I'd like to programmatically evaluate PEP-508-style platform markers such as platform_system == 'Windows'
. It's not terribly challenging to implement a parser, but I assume there is one in pip. What is it called and how can I import & use it in my own script?
python pip
python pip
asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:54
Tamás SzeleiTamás Szelei
14.1k1379148
14.1k1379148
pip does not have a public library API, and the pip devs don't want people importing & using the code in their own scripts. See the documentation for more information.
– jwodder
Nov 21 '18 at 17:58
Thanks for the heads-up. I kinda remembered that and since I'm controlling the whole environment, I'm fine with ignoring that.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 21 '18 at 18:08
add a comment |
pip does not have a public library API, and the pip devs don't want people importing & using the code in their own scripts. See the documentation for more information.
– jwodder
Nov 21 '18 at 17:58
Thanks for the heads-up. I kinda remembered that and since I'm controlling the whole environment, I'm fine with ignoring that.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 21 '18 at 18:08
pip does not have a public library API, and the pip devs don't want people importing & using the code in their own scripts. See the documentation for more information.
– jwodder
Nov 21 '18 at 17:58
pip does not have a public library API, and the pip devs don't want people importing & using the code in their own scripts. See the documentation for more information.
– jwodder
Nov 21 '18 at 17:58
Thanks for the heads-up. I kinda remembered that and since I'm controlling the whole environment, I'm fine with ignoring that.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 21 '18 at 18:08
Thanks for the heads-up. I kinda remembered that and since I'm controlling the whole environment, I'm fine with ignoring that.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 21 '18 at 18:08
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
pkg_resources
pkg_resources
(part of the setuptools
package) provides marker evaluation function.
In [1]: from pkg_resources import evaluate_marker
In [2]: evaluate_marker('sys_platform == "darwin"')
Out[2]: True
In [3]: evaluate_marker('python_version > "3.7"')
Out[3]: False
In [4]: evaluate_marker('implementation_name == "cpython"')
Out[4]: True
In [5]: evaluate_marker('garbage')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/hoefling/Library/Python/3.7/lib/python/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py", line 2961, in run_code
exec(code_obj, self.user_global_ns, self.user_ns)
File "<ipython-input-2-69434540d2ec>", line 1, in <module>
evaluate_marker('garbage')
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 1372, in evaluate_marker
raise SyntaxError(e)
File "<string>", line unknown
SyntaxError: Invalid marker: 'garbage', parse error at 'garbage'
etc.
packaging
Under the hood, pkg_resources.evaluate_marker
uses packaging.markers.Marker.evaluate
from the packaging
package, so you can use that instead:
In [6]: from packaging.markers import Marker
In [7]: Marker('"linux" in sys_platform').evaluate()
Out[7]: False
Perfect, thank you very much! This is exactly what I needed.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 22 '18 at 10:31
Glad I could help!
– hoefling
Nov 22 '18 at 12:27
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53417969%2fhow-to-evaluate-pep-508-style-platform-markers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
pkg_resources
pkg_resources
(part of the setuptools
package) provides marker evaluation function.
In [1]: from pkg_resources import evaluate_marker
In [2]: evaluate_marker('sys_platform == "darwin"')
Out[2]: True
In [3]: evaluate_marker('python_version > "3.7"')
Out[3]: False
In [4]: evaluate_marker('implementation_name == "cpython"')
Out[4]: True
In [5]: evaluate_marker('garbage')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/hoefling/Library/Python/3.7/lib/python/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py", line 2961, in run_code
exec(code_obj, self.user_global_ns, self.user_ns)
File "<ipython-input-2-69434540d2ec>", line 1, in <module>
evaluate_marker('garbage')
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 1372, in evaluate_marker
raise SyntaxError(e)
File "<string>", line unknown
SyntaxError: Invalid marker: 'garbage', parse error at 'garbage'
etc.
packaging
Under the hood, pkg_resources.evaluate_marker
uses packaging.markers.Marker.evaluate
from the packaging
package, so you can use that instead:
In [6]: from packaging.markers import Marker
In [7]: Marker('"linux" in sys_platform').evaluate()
Out[7]: False
Perfect, thank you very much! This is exactly what I needed.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 22 '18 at 10:31
Glad I could help!
– hoefling
Nov 22 '18 at 12:27
add a comment |
pkg_resources
pkg_resources
(part of the setuptools
package) provides marker evaluation function.
In [1]: from pkg_resources import evaluate_marker
In [2]: evaluate_marker('sys_platform == "darwin"')
Out[2]: True
In [3]: evaluate_marker('python_version > "3.7"')
Out[3]: False
In [4]: evaluate_marker('implementation_name == "cpython"')
Out[4]: True
In [5]: evaluate_marker('garbage')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/hoefling/Library/Python/3.7/lib/python/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py", line 2961, in run_code
exec(code_obj, self.user_global_ns, self.user_ns)
File "<ipython-input-2-69434540d2ec>", line 1, in <module>
evaluate_marker('garbage')
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 1372, in evaluate_marker
raise SyntaxError(e)
File "<string>", line unknown
SyntaxError: Invalid marker: 'garbage', parse error at 'garbage'
etc.
packaging
Under the hood, pkg_resources.evaluate_marker
uses packaging.markers.Marker.evaluate
from the packaging
package, so you can use that instead:
In [6]: from packaging.markers import Marker
In [7]: Marker('"linux" in sys_platform').evaluate()
Out[7]: False
Perfect, thank you very much! This is exactly what I needed.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 22 '18 at 10:31
Glad I could help!
– hoefling
Nov 22 '18 at 12:27
add a comment |
pkg_resources
pkg_resources
(part of the setuptools
package) provides marker evaluation function.
In [1]: from pkg_resources import evaluate_marker
In [2]: evaluate_marker('sys_platform == "darwin"')
Out[2]: True
In [3]: evaluate_marker('python_version > "3.7"')
Out[3]: False
In [4]: evaluate_marker('implementation_name == "cpython"')
Out[4]: True
In [5]: evaluate_marker('garbage')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/hoefling/Library/Python/3.7/lib/python/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py", line 2961, in run_code
exec(code_obj, self.user_global_ns, self.user_ns)
File "<ipython-input-2-69434540d2ec>", line 1, in <module>
evaluate_marker('garbage')
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 1372, in evaluate_marker
raise SyntaxError(e)
File "<string>", line unknown
SyntaxError: Invalid marker: 'garbage', parse error at 'garbage'
etc.
packaging
Under the hood, pkg_resources.evaluate_marker
uses packaging.markers.Marker.evaluate
from the packaging
package, so you can use that instead:
In [6]: from packaging.markers import Marker
In [7]: Marker('"linux" in sys_platform').evaluate()
Out[7]: False
pkg_resources
pkg_resources
(part of the setuptools
package) provides marker evaluation function.
In [1]: from pkg_resources import evaluate_marker
In [2]: evaluate_marker('sys_platform == "darwin"')
Out[2]: True
In [3]: evaluate_marker('python_version > "3.7"')
Out[3]: False
In [4]: evaluate_marker('implementation_name == "cpython"')
Out[4]: True
In [5]: evaluate_marker('garbage')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/hoefling/Library/Python/3.7/lib/python/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py", line 2961, in run_code
exec(code_obj, self.user_global_ns, self.user_ns)
File "<ipython-input-2-69434540d2ec>", line 1, in <module>
evaluate_marker('garbage')
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 1372, in evaluate_marker
raise SyntaxError(e)
File "<string>", line unknown
SyntaxError: Invalid marker: 'garbage', parse error at 'garbage'
etc.
packaging
Under the hood, pkg_resources.evaluate_marker
uses packaging.markers.Marker.evaluate
from the packaging
package, so you can use that instead:
In [6]: from packaging.markers import Marker
In [7]: Marker('"linux" in sys_platform').evaluate()
Out[7]: False
edited Nov 22 '18 at 2:46
answered Nov 22 '18 at 2:39
hoeflinghoefling
12.6k43165
12.6k43165
Perfect, thank you very much! This is exactly what I needed.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 22 '18 at 10:31
Glad I could help!
– hoefling
Nov 22 '18 at 12:27
add a comment |
Perfect, thank you very much! This is exactly what I needed.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 22 '18 at 10:31
Glad I could help!
– hoefling
Nov 22 '18 at 12:27
Perfect, thank you very much! This is exactly what I needed.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 22 '18 at 10:31
Perfect, thank you very much! This is exactly what I needed.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 22 '18 at 10:31
Glad I could help!
– hoefling
Nov 22 '18 at 12:27
Glad I could help!
– hoefling
Nov 22 '18 at 12:27
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53417969%2fhow-to-evaluate-pep-508-style-platform-markers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
pip does not have a public library API, and the pip devs don't want people importing & using the code in their own scripts. See the documentation for more information.
– jwodder
Nov 21 '18 at 17:58
Thanks for the heads-up. I kinda remembered that and since I'm controlling the whole environment, I'm fine with ignoring that.
– Tamás Szelei
Nov 21 '18 at 18:08