Output parameter without specifying its name
I'm using Entity Framework 6.2.0. To execute a stored procedure with an output parameter in EF we have to do the following (also, on SO):
// Create a ObjectParameter instance to retrieve output parameter from stored procedure
ObjectParameter output = new ObjectParameter("ID", typeof(Int32));
context.InsertPerson(name, description, output);
A typical auto-generated InsertPerson()
method looks like this:
public virtual int InsertPerson(string name, string description, ObjectParameter output)
{
var nameParameter = new ObjectParameter("name", name);
var descriptionParameter = new ObjectParameter("description", description);
return ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext.ExecuteFunction("InsertPerson", nameParameter , descriptionParameter , output);
}
So, InsertPerson()
method requires the output
parameter to be initialized with the actual SP parameter name and passed in to it.
But this doesn't make sense to me, because clients of the context
shouldn't know names of actual SP output params. We're not required to know input param names. Then, why we have to know names of the output ones?
Moreover, after renaming the output
param in SP and updating the EF model from DB, we neither are getting our code auto-updated accordingly, nor have a good way (compiler error) of knowing that our code is out of sync with the DB schema.
Why the method is not generated like this:
public virtual int InsertPerson(string name, string description, out int output)
{
var nameParameter = new ObjectParameter("name", name);
var descriptionParameter = new ObjectParameter("description", description);
var outputParameter = new ObjectParameter("ID", typeof(Int32));
var result = ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext.ExecuteFunction("InsertPerson", nameParameter , descriptionParameter , outputParameter);
output = outputParameter.Value;
return result;
}
How to execute a SP with an output parameter in EF without having to specify the parameter name?
c# .net entity-framework stored-procedures
add a comment |
I'm using Entity Framework 6.2.0. To execute a stored procedure with an output parameter in EF we have to do the following (also, on SO):
// Create a ObjectParameter instance to retrieve output parameter from stored procedure
ObjectParameter output = new ObjectParameter("ID", typeof(Int32));
context.InsertPerson(name, description, output);
A typical auto-generated InsertPerson()
method looks like this:
public virtual int InsertPerson(string name, string description, ObjectParameter output)
{
var nameParameter = new ObjectParameter("name", name);
var descriptionParameter = new ObjectParameter("description", description);
return ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext.ExecuteFunction("InsertPerson", nameParameter , descriptionParameter , output);
}
So, InsertPerson()
method requires the output
parameter to be initialized with the actual SP parameter name and passed in to it.
But this doesn't make sense to me, because clients of the context
shouldn't know names of actual SP output params. We're not required to know input param names. Then, why we have to know names of the output ones?
Moreover, after renaming the output
param in SP and updating the EF model from DB, we neither are getting our code auto-updated accordingly, nor have a good way (compiler error) of knowing that our code is out of sync with the DB schema.
Why the method is not generated like this:
public virtual int InsertPerson(string name, string description, out int output)
{
var nameParameter = new ObjectParameter("name", name);
var descriptionParameter = new ObjectParameter("description", description);
var outputParameter = new ObjectParameter("ID", typeof(Int32));
var result = ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext.ExecuteFunction("InsertPerson", nameParameter , descriptionParameter , outputParameter);
output = outputParameter.Value;
return result;
}
How to execute a SP with an output parameter in EF without having to specify the parameter name?
c# .net entity-framework stored-procedures
add a comment |
I'm using Entity Framework 6.2.0. To execute a stored procedure with an output parameter in EF we have to do the following (also, on SO):
// Create a ObjectParameter instance to retrieve output parameter from stored procedure
ObjectParameter output = new ObjectParameter("ID", typeof(Int32));
context.InsertPerson(name, description, output);
A typical auto-generated InsertPerson()
method looks like this:
public virtual int InsertPerson(string name, string description, ObjectParameter output)
{
var nameParameter = new ObjectParameter("name", name);
var descriptionParameter = new ObjectParameter("description", description);
return ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext.ExecuteFunction("InsertPerson", nameParameter , descriptionParameter , output);
}
So, InsertPerson()
method requires the output
parameter to be initialized with the actual SP parameter name and passed in to it.
But this doesn't make sense to me, because clients of the context
shouldn't know names of actual SP output params. We're not required to know input param names. Then, why we have to know names of the output ones?
Moreover, after renaming the output
param in SP and updating the EF model from DB, we neither are getting our code auto-updated accordingly, nor have a good way (compiler error) of knowing that our code is out of sync with the DB schema.
Why the method is not generated like this:
public virtual int InsertPerson(string name, string description, out int output)
{
var nameParameter = new ObjectParameter("name", name);
var descriptionParameter = new ObjectParameter("description", description);
var outputParameter = new ObjectParameter("ID", typeof(Int32));
var result = ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext.ExecuteFunction("InsertPerson", nameParameter , descriptionParameter , outputParameter);
output = outputParameter.Value;
return result;
}
How to execute a SP with an output parameter in EF without having to specify the parameter name?
c# .net entity-framework stored-procedures
I'm using Entity Framework 6.2.0. To execute a stored procedure with an output parameter in EF we have to do the following (also, on SO):
// Create a ObjectParameter instance to retrieve output parameter from stored procedure
ObjectParameter output = new ObjectParameter("ID", typeof(Int32));
context.InsertPerson(name, description, output);
A typical auto-generated InsertPerson()
method looks like this:
public virtual int InsertPerson(string name, string description, ObjectParameter output)
{
var nameParameter = new ObjectParameter("name", name);
var descriptionParameter = new ObjectParameter("description", description);
return ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext.ExecuteFunction("InsertPerson", nameParameter , descriptionParameter , output);
}
So, InsertPerson()
method requires the output
parameter to be initialized with the actual SP parameter name and passed in to it.
But this doesn't make sense to me, because clients of the context
shouldn't know names of actual SP output params. We're not required to know input param names. Then, why we have to know names of the output ones?
Moreover, after renaming the output
param in SP and updating the EF model from DB, we neither are getting our code auto-updated accordingly, nor have a good way (compiler error) of knowing that our code is out of sync with the DB schema.
Why the method is not generated like this:
public virtual int InsertPerson(string name, string description, out int output)
{
var nameParameter = new ObjectParameter("name", name);
var descriptionParameter = new ObjectParameter("description", description);
var outputParameter = new ObjectParameter("ID", typeof(Int32));
var result = ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext.ExecuteFunction("InsertPerson", nameParameter , descriptionParameter , outputParameter);
output = outputParameter.Value;
return result;
}
How to execute a SP with an output parameter in EF without having to specify the parameter name?
c# .net entity-framework stored-procedures
c# .net entity-framework stored-procedures
edited Nov 21 '18 at 18:16
Alexander Abakumov
asked Nov 21 '18 at 18:04
Alexander AbakumovAlexander Abakumov
4,55844169
4,55844169
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53418106%2foutput-parameter-without-specifying-its-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53418106%2foutput-parameter-without-specifying-its-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown