Usage of “Potential vs Promising” as an adjective












0















"Lithium ion batteries are considered as the most potential candidates for energy storage devices"



A native speaker who reviewed this sentence asked me to change "potential" to "promising". I couldn't get it because I can see in oxford dictionary that "potential" is also used as an adjective like in the following examples:



**Many supermarkets now provide free buses to carry potential customers into their premises.’



‘Instead the study was just a process to find out the potential capacity for new homes.’**



Is the change requested by him valid? Can anyone explain please?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • There is nothing wrong with the original sentence per se, but it's strange and likely not what you had meant to say. Also, the edit is correcting the wrong thing. Lithium ion batteries are energy storage devices—so calling them candidates (or potential candidates) makes no sense in the first place.

    – Jason Bassford
    21 hours ago


















0















"Lithium ion batteries are considered as the most potential candidates for energy storage devices"



A native speaker who reviewed this sentence asked me to change "potential" to "promising". I couldn't get it because I can see in oxford dictionary that "potential" is also used as an adjective like in the following examples:



**Many supermarkets now provide free buses to carry potential customers into their premises.’



‘Instead the study was just a process to find out the potential capacity for new homes.’**



Is the change requested by him valid? Can anyone explain please?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • There is nothing wrong with the original sentence per se, but it's strange and likely not what you had meant to say. Also, the edit is correcting the wrong thing. Lithium ion batteries are energy storage devices—so calling them candidates (or potential candidates) makes no sense in the first place.

    – Jason Bassford
    21 hours ago
















0












0








0








"Lithium ion batteries are considered as the most potential candidates for energy storage devices"



A native speaker who reviewed this sentence asked me to change "potential" to "promising". I couldn't get it because I can see in oxford dictionary that "potential" is also used as an adjective like in the following examples:



**Many supermarkets now provide free buses to carry potential customers into their premises.’



‘Instead the study was just a process to find out the potential capacity for new homes.’**



Is the change requested by him valid? Can anyone explain please?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












"Lithium ion batteries are considered as the most potential candidates for energy storage devices"



A native speaker who reviewed this sentence asked me to change "potential" to "promising". I couldn't get it because I can see in oxford dictionary that "potential" is also used as an adjective like in the following examples:



**Many supermarkets now provide free buses to carry potential customers into their premises.’



‘Instead the study was just a process to find out the potential capacity for new homes.’**



Is the change requested by him valid? Can anyone explain please?







word-choice vocabulary






share|improve this question







New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 23 hours ago









AaronAaron

31




31




New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • There is nothing wrong with the original sentence per se, but it's strange and likely not what you had meant to say. Also, the edit is correcting the wrong thing. Lithium ion batteries are energy storage devices—so calling them candidates (or potential candidates) makes no sense in the first place.

    – Jason Bassford
    21 hours ago





















  • There is nothing wrong with the original sentence per se, but it's strange and likely not what you had meant to say. Also, the edit is correcting the wrong thing. Lithium ion batteries are energy storage devices—so calling them candidates (or potential candidates) makes no sense in the first place.

    – Jason Bassford
    21 hours ago



















There is nothing wrong with the original sentence per se, but it's strange and likely not what you had meant to say. Also, the edit is correcting the wrong thing. Lithium ion batteries are energy storage devices—so calling them candidates (or potential candidates) makes no sense in the first place.

– Jason Bassford
21 hours ago







There is nothing wrong with the original sentence per se, but it's strange and likely not what you had meant to say. Also, the edit is correcting the wrong thing. Lithium ion batteries are energy storage devices—so calling them candidates (or potential candidates) makes no sense in the first place.

– Jason Bassford
21 hours ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















-1














Yes, his edit is valid. As an adjective "potential" means "possible." "Candidate," when referring to a thing, basically means "possible choice." So the sentence as you wrote it basically says "Batteries are the most possible possible choice."



Additionally, though it is quite common to see the noun form of potential modified by "most," (ex: that student had the most potential for greatness her teacher had ever seen) I've almost never seen those words paired when potential is used as an adjective.



By replacing "potential" with "promising," your editor is asking you to replace a redundant word with one that adds meaning--"most promising candidate" means that this is the choice that has the best chance of succeeding.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Katy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • This explanation is really helpful. Thank you so much

    – Aaron
    21 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484632%2fusage-of-potential-vs-promising-as-an-adjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









-1














Yes, his edit is valid. As an adjective "potential" means "possible." "Candidate," when referring to a thing, basically means "possible choice." So the sentence as you wrote it basically says "Batteries are the most possible possible choice."



Additionally, though it is quite common to see the noun form of potential modified by "most," (ex: that student had the most potential for greatness her teacher had ever seen) I've almost never seen those words paired when potential is used as an adjective.



By replacing "potential" with "promising," your editor is asking you to replace a redundant word with one that adds meaning--"most promising candidate" means that this is the choice that has the best chance of succeeding.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Katy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • This explanation is really helpful. Thank you so much

    – Aaron
    21 hours ago
















-1














Yes, his edit is valid. As an adjective "potential" means "possible." "Candidate," when referring to a thing, basically means "possible choice." So the sentence as you wrote it basically says "Batteries are the most possible possible choice."



Additionally, though it is quite common to see the noun form of potential modified by "most," (ex: that student had the most potential for greatness her teacher had ever seen) I've almost never seen those words paired when potential is used as an adjective.



By replacing "potential" with "promising," your editor is asking you to replace a redundant word with one that adds meaning--"most promising candidate" means that this is the choice that has the best chance of succeeding.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Katy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • This explanation is really helpful. Thank you so much

    – Aaron
    21 hours ago














-1












-1








-1







Yes, his edit is valid. As an adjective "potential" means "possible." "Candidate," when referring to a thing, basically means "possible choice." So the sentence as you wrote it basically says "Batteries are the most possible possible choice."



Additionally, though it is quite common to see the noun form of potential modified by "most," (ex: that student had the most potential for greatness her teacher had ever seen) I've almost never seen those words paired when potential is used as an adjective.



By replacing "potential" with "promising," your editor is asking you to replace a redundant word with one that adds meaning--"most promising candidate" means that this is the choice that has the best chance of succeeding.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Katy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










Yes, his edit is valid. As an adjective "potential" means "possible." "Candidate," when referring to a thing, basically means "possible choice." So the sentence as you wrote it basically says "Batteries are the most possible possible choice."



Additionally, though it is quite common to see the noun form of potential modified by "most," (ex: that student had the most potential for greatness her teacher had ever seen) I've almost never seen those words paired when potential is used as an adjective.



By replacing "potential" with "promising," your editor is asking you to replace a redundant word with one that adds meaning--"most promising candidate" means that this is the choice that has the best chance of succeeding.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Katy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




Katy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 22 hours ago









KatyKaty

1942




1942




New contributor




Katy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Katy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Katy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • This explanation is really helpful. Thank you so much

    – Aaron
    21 hours ago



















  • This explanation is really helpful. Thank you so much

    – Aaron
    21 hours ago

















This explanation is really helpful. Thank you so much

– Aaron
21 hours ago





This explanation is really helpful. Thank you so much

– Aaron
21 hours ago










Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484632%2fusage-of-potential-vs-promising-as-an-adjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]