The Legend of Four












4












$begingroup$


As far as I know, all numbers have a root of 4. What I mean by this is as follows:



Starting with any number, for example 384, I take the number of letters in that number. Then I repeat this process until it infinitely repeats the number 4.



Three Hundred Eighty Four = 22



Twenty Two = 9



Nine = 4



Four = 4



So I challenge you to find any number which does not follow this rule.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Rigidity is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
    $endgroup$
    – Rigidity
    5 hours ago
















4












$begingroup$


As far as I know, all numbers have a root of 4. What I mean by this is as follows:



Starting with any number, for example 384, I take the number of letters in that number. Then I repeat this process until it infinitely repeats the number 4.



Three Hundred Eighty Four = 22



Twenty Two = 9



Nine = 4



Four = 4



So I challenge you to find any number which does not follow this rule.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Rigidity is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
    $endgroup$
    – Rigidity
    5 hours ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$


As far as I know, all numbers have a root of 4. What I mean by this is as follows:



Starting with any number, for example 384, I take the number of letters in that number. Then I repeat this process until it infinitely repeats the number 4.



Three Hundred Eighty Four = 22



Twenty Two = 9



Nine = 4



Four = 4



So I challenge you to find any number which does not follow this rule.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Rigidity is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




As far as I know, all numbers have a root of 4. What I mean by this is as follows:



Starting with any number, for example 384, I take the number of letters in that number. Then I repeat this process until it infinitely repeats the number 4.



Three Hundred Eighty Four = 22



Twenty Two = 9



Nine = 4



Four = 4



So I challenge you to find any number which does not follow this rule.







mathematics number-sequence number-theory






share|improve this question







New contributor




Rigidity is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Rigidity is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Rigidity is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









RigidityRigidity

211




211




New contributor




Rigidity is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Rigidity is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Rigidity is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
    $endgroup$
    – Rigidity
    5 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
    $endgroup$
    – Rigidity
    5 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
$endgroup$
– Rigidity
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
$endgroup$
– Rigidity
5 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

There are some trick solutions




For example, in Spanish, 4 and 6 are cuatro and seis respectively, so starting at either one of those will lead to an infinite cycle of 4-6-4-6-4... Thus, I'll begin with the assumption we are just using English.




With that in mind




Negative number and decimals both have a positive, whole number of letters, so after one iteration, every number is a positive, whole integer. Every number below ten has, at most, 5 letters within it. Thus, numbers from 20-29 will contain no more that 6+5=11 letters, below the lower bound for this range. A similar argument can be applied for every other number above 29. Every number from 10-19 has, at most, 9 letters in it. This is also below the lower bound of 10. With this, it is easy to see any number above ten will quickly drop below ten.




So, for the final step




One, two, six and ten lead to three.
Three, seven, eight lead to five.
Zero, four, five and nine lead to four.
This accounts for all of the numbers. We have shown every number reaches below ten, and every number up to ten reaches four within its third step. Thus, every number will eventually reach four.




To answer your question




There is no number that does not follow this rule.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$


    There's no such number. Sooner or later you'll end up with a positive integer equal to its own number of letters, which can only be 4; or a loop where it regularly increases and decreases. Only the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2 and 3 are less than the number of their letters due to the way all integers are written, and even they end up giving 4, so a loop is impossible.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      Since the OP asks for any number, we can extend the definition to constant numbers like pi or e (Euler's Constant)




      Both these cannot be counted (till infinity??)



      So technically they do not end with four??







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$









      • 1




        $begingroup$
        You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
        $endgroup$
        – ZanyG
        3 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
        $endgroup$
        – DEEM
        3 hours ago



















      1












      $begingroup$

      Technically you could say




      'Seven billion billionths' (always add those last two words)




      The last two words make certain that you won't get to 4.



      There's also:




      'times one' 'not the number four' 'is a silly solution'




      and many more!



         Wikipedia says this is an unsolved problem in mathematics, so yeah.
      I realized 'eight billion billionths' might be the second number alphabetically...





      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "559"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        Rigidity is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79726%2fthe-legend-of-four%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        8












        $begingroup$

        There are some trick solutions




        For example, in Spanish, 4 and 6 are cuatro and seis respectively, so starting at either one of those will lead to an infinite cycle of 4-6-4-6-4... Thus, I'll begin with the assumption we are just using English.




        With that in mind




        Negative number and decimals both have a positive, whole number of letters, so after one iteration, every number is a positive, whole integer. Every number below ten has, at most, 5 letters within it. Thus, numbers from 20-29 will contain no more that 6+5=11 letters, below the lower bound for this range. A similar argument can be applied for every other number above 29. Every number from 10-19 has, at most, 9 letters in it. This is also below the lower bound of 10. With this, it is easy to see any number above ten will quickly drop below ten.




        So, for the final step




        One, two, six and ten lead to three.
        Three, seven, eight lead to five.
        Zero, four, five and nine lead to four.
        This accounts for all of the numbers. We have shown every number reaches below ten, and every number up to ten reaches four within its third step. Thus, every number will eventually reach four.




        To answer your question




        There is no number that does not follow this rule.







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          8












          $begingroup$

          There are some trick solutions




          For example, in Spanish, 4 and 6 are cuatro and seis respectively, so starting at either one of those will lead to an infinite cycle of 4-6-4-6-4... Thus, I'll begin with the assumption we are just using English.




          With that in mind




          Negative number and decimals both have a positive, whole number of letters, so after one iteration, every number is a positive, whole integer. Every number below ten has, at most, 5 letters within it. Thus, numbers from 20-29 will contain no more that 6+5=11 letters, below the lower bound for this range. A similar argument can be applied for every other number above 29. Every number from 10-19 has, at most, 9 letters in it. This is also below the lower bound of 10. With this, it is easy to see any number above ten will quickly drop below ten.




          So, for the final step




          One, two, six and ten lead to three.
          Three, seven, eight lead to five.
          Zero, four, five and nine lead to four.
          This accounts for all of the numbers. We have shown every number reaches below ten, and every number up to ten reaches four within its third step. Thus, every number will eventually reach four.




          To answer your question




          There is no number that does not follow this rule.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            8












            8








            8





            $begingroup$

            There are some trick solutions




            For example, in Spanish, 4 and 6 are cuatro and seis respectively, so starting at either one of those will lead to an infinite cycle of 4-6-4-6-4... Thus, I'll begin with the assumption we are just using English.




            With that in mind




            Negative number and decimals both have a positive, whole number of letters, so after one iteration, every number is a positive, whole integer. Every number below ten has, at most, 5 letters within it. Thus, numbers from 20-29 will contain no more that 6+5=11 letters, below the lower bound for this range. A similar argument can be applied for every other number above 29. Every number from 10-19 has, at most, 9 letters in it. This is also below the lower bound of 10. With this, it is easy to see any number above ten will quickly drop below ten.




            So, for the final step




            One, two, six and ten lead to three.
            Three, seven, eight lead to five.
            Zero, four, five and nine lead to four.
            This accounts for all of the numbers. We have shown every number reaches below ten, and every number up to ten reaches four within its third step. Thus, every number will eventually reach four.




            To answer your question




            There is no number that does not follow this rule.







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            There are some trick solutions




            For example, in Spanish, 4 and 6 are cuatro and seis respectively, so starting at either one of those will lead to an infinite cycle of 4-6-4-6-4... Thus, I'll begin with the assumption we are just using English.




            With that in mind




            Negative number and decimals both have a positive, whole number of letters, so after one iteration, every number is a positive, whole integer. Every number below ten has, at most, 5 letters within it. Thus, numbers from 20-29 will contain no more that 6+5=11 letters, below the lower bound for this range. A similar argument can be applied for every other number above 29. Every number from 10-19 has, at most, 9 letters in it. This is also below the lower bound of 10. With this, it is easy to see any number above ten will quickly drop below ten.




            So, for the final step




            One, two, six and ten lead to three.
            Three, seven, eight lead to five.
            Zero, four, five and nine lead to four.
            This accounts for all of the numbers. We have shown every number reaches below ten, and every number up to ten reaches four within its third step. Thus, every number will eventually reach four.




            To answer your question




            There is no number that does not follow this rule.








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 5 hours ago









            ZanyGZanyG

            629216




            629216























                2












                $begingroup$


                There's no such number. Sooner or later you'll end up with a positive integer equal to its own number of letters, which can only be 4; or a loop where it regularly increases and decreases. Only the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2 and 3 are less than the number of their letters due to the way all integers are written, and even they end up giving 4, so a loop is impossible.







                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  2












                  $begingroup$


                  There's no such number. Sooner or later you'll end up with a positive integer equal to its own number of letters, which can only be 4; or a loop where it regularly increases and decreases. Only the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2 and 3 are less than the number of their letters due to the way all integers are written, and even they end up giving 4, so a loop is impossible.







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$


                    There's no such number. Sooner or later you'll end up with a positive integer equal to its own number of letters, which can only be 4; or a loop where it regularly increases and decreases. Only the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2 and 3 are less than the number of their letters due to the way all integers are written, and even they end up giving 4, so a loop is impossible.







                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$




                    There's no such number. Sooner or later you'll end up with a positive integer equal to its own number of letters, which can only be 4; or a loop where it regularly increases and decreases. Only the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2 and 3 are less than the number of their letters due to the way all integers are written, and even they end up giving 4, so a loop is impossible.








                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 3 hours ago

























                    answered 5 hours ago









                    NautilusNautilus

                    3,978525




                    3,978525























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Since the OP asks for any number, we can extend the definition to constant numbers like pi or e (Euler's Constant)




                        Both these cannot be counted (till infinity??)



                        So technically they do not end with four??







                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$









                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ZanyG
                          3 hours ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
                          $endgroup$
                          – DEEM
                          3 hours ago
















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Since the OP asks for any number, we can extend the definition to constant numbers like pi or e (Euler's Constant)




                        Both these cannot be counted (till infinity??)



                        So technically they do not end with four??







                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$









                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ZanyG
                          3 hours ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
                          $endgroup$
                          – DEEM
                          3 hours ago














                        1












                        1








                        1





                        $begingroup$

                        Since the OP asks for any number, we can extend the definition to constant numbers like pi or e (Euler's Constant)




                        Both these cannot be counted (till infinity??)



                        So technically they do not end with four??







                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        Since the OP asks for any number, we can extend the definition to constant numbers like pi or e (Euler's Constant)




                        Both these cannot be counted (till infinity??)



                        So technically they do not end with four??








                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 4 hours ago









                        DEEMDEEM

                        5,968119106




                        5,968119106








                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ZanyG
                          3 hours ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
                          $endgroup$
                          – DEEM
                          3 hours ago














                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
                          $endgroup$
                          – ZanyG
                          3 hours ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
                          $endgroup$
                          – DEEM
                          3 hours ago








                        1




                        1




                        $begingroup$
                        You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
                        $endgroup$
                        – ZanyG
                        3 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
                        $endgroup$
                        – ZanyG
                        3 hours ago












                        $begingroup$
                        Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
                        $endgroup$
                        – DEEM
                        3 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
                        $endgroup$
                        – DEEM
                        3 hours ago











                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Technically you could say




                        'Seven billion billionths' (always add those last two words)




                        The last two words make certain that you won't get to 4.



                        There's also:




                        'times one' 'not the number four' 'is a silly solution'




                        and many more!



                           Wikipedia says this is an unsolved problem in mathematics, so yeah.
                        I realized 'eight billion billionths' might be the second number alphabetically...





                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          Technically you could say




                          'Seven billion billionths' (always add those last two words)




                          The last two words make certain that you won't get to 4.



                          There's also:




                          'times one' 'not the number four' 'is a silly solution'




                          and many more!



                             Wikipedia says this is an unsolved problem in mathematics, so yeah.
                          I realized 'eight billion billionths' might be the second number alphabetically...





                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            Technically you could say




                            'Seven billion billionths' (always add those last two words)




                            The last two words make certain that you won't get to 4.



                            There's also:




                            'times one' 'not the number four' 'is a silly solution'




                            and many more!



                               Wikipedia says this is an unsolved problem in mathematics, so yeah.
                            I realized 'eight billion billionths' might be the second number alphabetically...





                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Technically you could say




                            'Seven billion billionths' (always add those last two words)




                            The last two words make certain that you won't get to 4.



                            There's also:




                            'times one' 'not the number four' 'is a silly solution'




                            and many more!



                               Wikipedia says this is an unsolved problem in mathematics, so yeah.
                            I realized 'eight billion billionths' might be the second number alphabetically...






                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 1 hour ago









                            AltoAlto

                            1,114119




                            1,114119






















                                Rigidity is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Rigidity is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                Rigidity is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Rigidity is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79726%2fthe-legend-of-four%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                                Alcedinidae

                                RAC Tourist Trophy