The Legend of Four
$begingroup$
As far as I know, all numbers have a root of 4. What I mean by this is as follows:
Starting with any number, for example 384, I take the number of letters in that number. Then I repeat this process until it infinitely repeats the number 4.
Three Hundred Eighty Four = 22
Twenty Two = 9
Nine = 4
Four = 4
So I challenge you to find any number which does not follow this rule.
mathematics number-sequence number-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As far as I know, all numbers have a root of 4. What I mean by this is as follows:
Starting with any number, for example 384, I take the number of letters in that number. Then I repeat this process until it infinitely repeats the number 4.
Three Hundred Eighty Four = 22
Twenty Two = 9
Nine = 4
Four = 4
So I challenge you to find any number which does not follow this rule.
mathematics number-sequence number-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
$endgroup$
– Rigidity
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As far as I know, all numbers have a root of 4. What I mean by this is as follows:
Starting with any number, for example 384, I take the number of letters in that number. Then I repeat this process until it infinitely repeats the number 4.
Three Hundred Eighty Four = 22
Twenty Two = 9
Nine = 4
Four = 4
So I challenge you to find any number which does not follow this rule.
mathematics number-sequence number-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
As far as I know, all numbers have a root of 4. What I mean by this is as follows:
Starting with any number, for example 384, I take the number of letters in that number. Then I repeat this process until it infinitely repeats the number 4.
Three Hundred Eighty Four = 22
Twenty Two = 9
Nine = 4
Four = 4
So I challenge you to find any number which does not follow this rule.
mathematics number-sequence number-theory
mathematics number-sequence number-theory
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 6 hours ago
RigidityRigidity
211
211
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
$endgroup$
– Rigidity
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
$endgroup$
– Rigidity
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
$endgroup$
– Rigidity
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
$endgroup$
– Rigidity
5 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are some trick solutions
For example, in Spanish, 4 and 6 are cuatro and seis respectively, so starting at either one of those will lead to an infinite cycle of 4-6-4-6-4... Thus, I'll begin with the assumption we are just using English.
With that in mind
Negative number and decimals both have a positive, whole number of letters, so after one iteration, every number is a positive, whole integer. Every number below ten has, at most, 5 letters within it. Thus, numbers from 20-29 will contain no more that 6+5=11 letters, below the lower bound for this range. A similar argument can be applied for every other number above 29. Every number from 10-19 has, at most, 9 letters in it. This is also below the lower bound of 10. With this, it is easy to see any number above ten will quickly drop below ten.
So, for the final step
One, two, six and ten lead to three.
Three, seven, eight lead to five.
Zero, four, five and nine lead to four.
This accounts for all of the numbers. We have shown every number reaches below ten, and every number up to ten reaches four within its third step. Thus, every number will eventually reach four.
To answer your question
There is no number that does not follow this rule.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's no such number. Sooner or later you'll end up with a positive integer equal to its own number of letters, which can only be 4; or a loop where it regularly increases and decreases. Only the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2 and 3 are less than the number of their letters due to the way all integers are written, and even they end up giving 4, so a loop is impossible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the OP asks for any number, we can extend the definition to constant numbers like pi or e (Euler's Constant)
Both these cannot be counted (till infinity??)
So technically they do not end with four??
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
$endgroup$
– ZanyG
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
$endgroup$
– DEEM
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Technically you could say
'Seven billion billionths' (always add those last two words)
The last two words make certain that you won't get to 4.
There's also:
'times one' 'not the number four' 'is a silly solution'
and many more!
Wikipedia says this is an unsolved problem in mathematics, so yeah.
I realized 'eight billion billionths' might be the second number alphabetically...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Rigidity is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79726%2fthe-legend-of-four%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are some trick solutions
For example, in Spanish, 4 and 6 are cuatro and seis respectively, so starting at either one of those will lead to an infinite cycle of 4-6-4-6-4... Thus, I'll begin with the assumption we are just using English.
With that in mind
Negative number and decimals both have a positive, whole number of letters, so after one iteration, every number is a positive, whole integer. Every number below ten has, at most, 5 letters within it. Thus, numbers from 20-29 will contain no more that 6+5=11 letters, below the lower bound for this range. A similar argument can be applied for every other number above 29. Every number from 10-19 has, at most, 9 letters in it. This is also below the lower bound of 10. With this, it is easy to see any number above ten will quickly drop below ten.
So, for the final step
One, two, six and ten lead to three.
Three, seven, eight lead to five.
Zero, four, five and nine lead to four.
This accounts for all of the numbers. We have shown every number reaches below ten, and every number up to ten reaches four within its third step. Thus, every number will eventually reach four.
To answer your question
There is no number that does not follow this rule.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are some trick solutions
For example, in Spanish, 4 and 6 are cuatro and seis respectively, so starting at either one of those will lead to an infinite cycle of 4-6-4-6-4... Thus, I'll begin with the assumption we are just using English.
With that in mind
Negative number and decimals both have a positive, whole number of letters, so after one iteration, every number is a positive, whole integer. Every number below ten has, at most, 5 letters within it. Thus, numbers from 20-29 will contain no more that 6+5=11 letters, below the lower bound for this range. A similar argument can be applied for every other number above 29. Every number from 10-19 has, at most, 9 letters in it. This is also below the lower bound of 10. With this, it is easy to see any number above ten will quickly drop below ten.
So, for the final step
One, two, six and ten lead to three.
Three, seven, eight lead to five.
Zero, four, five and nine lead to four.
This accounts for all of the numbers. We have shown every number reaches below ten, and every number up to ten reaches four within its third step. Thus, every number will eventually reach four.
To answer your question
There is no number that does not follow this rule.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are some trick solutions
For example, in Spanish, 4 and 6 are cuatro and seis respectively, so starting at either one of those will lead to an infinite cycle of 4-6-4-6-4... Thus, I'll begin with the assumption we are just using English.
With that in mind
Negative number and decimals both have a positive, whole number of letters, so after one iteration, every number is a positive, whole integer. Every number below ten has, at most, 5 letters within it. Thus, numbers from 20-29 will contain no more that 6+5=11 letters, below the lower bound for this range. A similar argument can be applied for every other number above 29. Every number from 10-19 has, at most, 9 letters in it. This is also below the lower bound of 10. With this, it is easy to see any number above ten will quickly drop below ten.
So, for the final step
One, two, six and ten lead to three.
Three, seven, eight lead to five.
Zero, four, five and nine lead to four.
This accounts for all of the numbers. We have shown every number reaches below ten, and every number up to ten reaches four within its third step. Thus, every number will eventually reach four.
To answer your question
There is no number that does not follow this rule.
$endgroup$
There are some trick solutions
For example, in Spanish, 4 and 6 are cuatro and seis respectively, so starting at either one of those will lead to an infinite cycle of 4-6-4-6-4... Thus, I'll begin with the assumption we are just using English.
With that in mind
Negative number and decimals both have a positive, whole number of letters, so after one iteration, every number is a positive, whole integer. Every number below ten has, at most, 5 letters within it. Thus, numbers from 20-29 will contain no more that 6+5=11 letters, below the lower bound for this range. A similar argument can be applied for every other number above 29. Every number from 10-19 has, at most, 9 letters in it. This is also below the lower bound of 10. With this, it is easy to see any number above ten will quickly drop below ten.
So, for the final step
One, two, six and ten lead to three.
Three, seven, eight lead to five.
Zero, four, five and nine lead to four.
This accounts for all of the numbers. We have shown every number reaches below ten, and every number up to ten reaches four within its third step. Thus, every number will eventually reach four.
To answer your question
There is no number that does not follow this rule.
answered 5 hours ago
ZanyGZanyG
629216
629216
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's no such number. Sooner or later you'll end up with a positive integer equal to its own number of letters, which can only be 4; or a loop where it regularly increases and decreases. Only the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2 and 3 are less than the number of their letters due to the way all integers are written, and even they end up giving 4, so a loop is impossible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's no such number. Sooner or later you'll end up with a positive integer equal to its own number of letters, which can only be 4; or a loop where it regularly increases and decreases. Only the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2 and 3 are less than the number of their letters due to the way all integers are written, and even they end up giving 4, so a loop is impossible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's no such number. Sooner or later you'll end up with a positive integer equal to its own number of letters, which can only be 4; or a loop where it regularly increases and decreases. Only the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2 and 3 are less than the number of their letters due to the way all integers are written, and even they end up giving 4, so a loop is impossible.
$endgroup$
There's no such number. Sooner or later you'll end up with a positive integer equal to its own number of letters, which can only be 4; or a loop where it regularly increases and decreases. Only the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2 and 3 are less than the number of their letters due to the way all integers are written, and even they end up giving 4, so a loop is impossible.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
NautilusNautilus
3,978525
3,978525
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the OP asks for any number, we can extend the definition to constant numbers like pi or e (Euler's Constant)
Both these cannot be counted (till infinity??)
So technically they do not end with four??
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
$endgroup$
– ZanyG
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
$endgroup$
– DEEM
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the OP asks for any number, we can extend the definition to constant numbers like pi or e (Euler's Constant)
Both these cannot be counted (till infinity??)
So technically they do not end with four??
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
$endgroup$
– ZanyG
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
$endgroup$
– DEEM
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the OP asks for any number, we can extend the definition to constant numbers like pi or e (Euler's Constant)
Both these cannot be counted (till infinity??)
So technically they do not end with four??
$endgroup$
Since the OP asks for any number, we can extend the definition to constant numbers like pi or e (Euler's Constant)
Both these cannot be counted (till infinity??)
So technically they do not end with four??
answered 4 hours ago
DEEMDEEM
5,968119106
5,968119106
1
$begingroup$
You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
$endgroup$
– ZanyG
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
$endgroup$
– DEEM
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
$endgroup$
– ZanyG
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
$endgroup$
– DEEM
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
$endgroup$
– ZanyG
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You could argue that infinity has eight letters.
$endgroup$
– ZanyG
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
$endgroup$
– DEEM
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Infinity is not the pronounced nummber in pi and e. the pronouncing is so long it will never end
$endgroup$
– DEEM
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Technically you could say
'Seven billion billionths' (always add those last two words)
The last two words make certain that you won't get to 4.
There's also:
'times one' 'not the number four' 'is a silly solution'
and many more!
Wikipedia says this is an unsolved problem in mathematics, so yeah.
I realized 'eight billion billionths' might be the second number alphabetically...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Technically you could say
'Seven billion billionths' (always add those last two words)
The last two words make certain that you won't get to 4.
There's also:
'times one' 'not the number four' 'is a silly solution'
and many more!
Wikipedia says this is an unsolved problem in mathematics, so yeah.
I realized 'eight billion billionths' might be the second number alphabetically...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Technically you could say
'Seven billion billionths' (always add those last two words)
The last two words make certain that you won't get to 4.
There's also:
'times one' 'not the number four' 'is a silly solution'
and many more!
Wikipedia says this is an unsolved problem in mathematics, so yeah.
I realized 'eight billion billionths' might be the second number alphabetically...
$endgroup$
Technically you could say
'Seven billion billionths' (always add those last two words)
The last two words make certain that you won't get to 4.
There's also:
'times one' 'not the number four' 'is a silly solution'
and many more!
Wikipedia says this is an unsolved problem in mathematics, so yeah.
I realized 'eight billion billionths' might be the second number alphabetically...
answered 1 hour ago
AltoAlto
1,114119
1,114119
add a comment |
add a comment |
Rigidity is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rigidity is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rigidity is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rigidity is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79726%2fthe-legend-of-four%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I believe this is impossible. However, it is so strange that I know it is possible to not be :).
$endgroup$
– Rigidity
5 hours ago