What is that CFM56 with a toothed exhaust on an A321?












11












$begingroup$


I stumbled upon a wikimedia picture and I saw something that I have not seen before: a CFM56 with a toothed engine exhaust. Can someone explain to me what engine variant that is?



enter image description here
Source Author: Konstantin Nikiforov CC-BY-SA-3.0










share|improve this question









New contributor




Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting picture. Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually the "teeth" are meant to reduce noise levels, up to a couple dB.
    $endgroup$
    – Pheric
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    That is a very special add-on. I guess you learn something new every day.
    $endgroup$
    – Miyo Hazuki
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    related: aviation.stackexchange.com/q/19440/1467
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    yesterday
















11












$begingroup$


I stumbled upon a wikimedia picture and I saw something that I have not seen before: a CFM56 with a toothed engine exhaust. Can someone explain to me what engine variant that is?



enter image description here
Source Author: Konstantin Nikiforov CC-BY-SA-3.0










share|improve this question









New contributor




Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting picture. Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually the "teeth" are meant to reduce noise levels, up to a couple dB.
    $endgroup$
    – Pheric
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    That is a very special add-on. I guess you learn something new every day.
    $endgroup$
    – Miyo Hazuki
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    related: aviation.stackexchange.com/q/19440/1467
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    yesterday














11












11








11





$begingroup$


I stumbled upon a wikimedia picture and I saw something that I have not seen before: a CFM56 with a toothed engine exhaust. Can someone explain to me what engine variant that is?



enter image description here
Source Author: Konstantin Nikiforov CC-BY-SA-3.0










share|improve this question









New contributor




Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I stumbled upon a wikimedia picture and I saw something that I have not seen before: a CFM56 with a toothed engine exhaust. Can someone explain to me what engine variant that is?



enter image description here
Source Author: Konstantin Nikiforov CC-BY-SA-3.0







jet-engine airbus-a320 feature-identification chevrons






share|improve this question









New contributor




Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 33 mins ago









Federico

25.4k16101152




25.4k16101152






New contributor




Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Miyo HazukiMiyo Hazuki

564




564




New contributor




Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting picture. Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually the "teeth" are meant to reduce noise levels, up to a couple dB.
    $endgroup$
    – Pheric
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    That is a very special add-on. I guess you learn something new every day.
    $endgroup$
    – Miyo Hazuki
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    related: aviation.stackexchange.com/q/19440/1467
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    yesterday














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting picture. Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually the "teeth" are meant to reduce noise levels, up to a couple dB.
    $endgroup$
    – Pheric
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    That is a very special add-on. I guess you learn something new every day.
    $endgroup$
    – Miyo Hazuki
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    related: aviation.stackexchange.com/q/19440/1467
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    yesterday








1




1




$begingroup$
Interesting picture. Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
yesterday




$begingroup$
Interesting picture. Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
Usually the "teeth" are meant to reduce noise levels, up to a couple dB.
$endgroup$
– Pheric
yesterday




$begingroup$
Usually the "teeth" are meant to reduce noise levels, up to a couple dB.
$endgroup$
– Pheric
yesterday












$begingroup$
That is a very special add-on. I guess you learn something new every day.
$endgroup$
– Miyo Hazuki
yesterday




$begingroup$
That is a very special add-on. I guess you learn something new every day.
$endgroup$
– Miyo Hazuki
yesterday












$begingroup$
related: aviation.stackexchange.com/q/19440/1467
$endgroup$
– Federico
yesterday




$begingroup$
related: aviation.stackexchange.com/q/19440/1467
$endgroup$
– Federico
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















15












$begingroup$

The “toothed” exhaust are called Chevrons and they reduce noise. They are an option on CFM56 equipped A321 aircraft.



Wikipedia CFM International CFM56



”GE and Snecma also tested the effectiveness of chevrons on reducing jet noise. After examining configurations in the wind tunnel, CFMI chose to flight-test chevrons built into the core exhaust nozzle. The chevrons reduced jet noise by 1.3 perceived loudness decibels during takeoff conditions, and are now offered as an option with the CFM56 for the Airbus A321”






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    7












    $begingroup$

    So far my suspicion is that this is the /p option in "CFM International CFM56-5B3/P" as found when I looked up VP-BWN (the aircraft in your picture).
    The useful chart at Wikipedia, as linked by @Mike-Sowsun, does not list the /P option, which would of course complicate the chart. I wonder how many of these minor options are available? Not like I'm in the market.



    More Info:
    Airliners.net was excited about this roughly ten years ago, but the links to explanations have gone dry. So I was happy to see that one intrepid commenter there had done the right thing and produced a quote from the linked material, which I will reproduce here:




    As stated in the article :
    http://www.airbus.com/store/mm_repos...dia_object_file_FAST37_p19_p22.pdf



    The "noise package" is now standard on the A321 and an option on the
    other models. The reason behind this is that the A321 (heavy weight
    version) doesn't comply with the new stage 4 noise limits in effect
    for all new aircraft, certified after 1 January 2007. In fact this is
    the present noise standard, although legally not valid for the present
    A320 generation of aircraft, all certified before 1 januari 2007. All
    other sub types of the A320 series are at or below the stage 4 noise
    standard and don't need the chevrons, but can be delivered as an
    option with this "noise package", to become even more silent.



    Also stated in the article is the fact that the FADEC needs some
    tweaking to produce the same thrust level, so there must be a loss in
    efficiency somewhere. Because this is an Airbus brochure, nothing is
    said about the actual loss in SFC.




    Here's a similar explanation (again, without specific model number) from a 2002 GE press release:




    All CFM-powered A320 family aircraft meet current FAR Stage III noise
    requirements with significant margin. These engines also meet the CAEP
    5 recommendations, except for the CFM56-5B-powered A321. However, CFM
    and Airbus have defined an acoustic package to ensure this aircraft
    will operate well within proposed limits. CFM is conducting
    development testing on engine and nacelle treatments that will reduce
    the cumulative noise signature at least 10 EPNdB (effective perceived
    noise in decibels) below Stage III levels.



    The new technology includes three-dimensional aerodynamic designed
    outlet guide vanes; a core chevron nozzle; and improved reverser and
    inlet linings on the nacelle. Flight tests on the A321 are scheduled
    for later this year, followed by certification and entry into service
    in early 2003.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Thanks for the detailed explanation.
      $endgroup$
      – Miyo Hazuki
      20 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You can see chevrons on B-787 engines too.
      $endgroup$
      – Anthony X
      16 hours ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "528"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59751%2fwhat-is-that-cfm56-with-a-toothed-exhaust-on-an-a321%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    15












    $begingroup$

    The “toothed” exhaust are called Chevrons and they reduce noise. They are an option on CFM56 equipped A321 aircraft.



    Wikipedia CFM International CFM56



    ”GE and Snecma also tested the effectiveness of chevrons on reducing jet noise. After examining configurations in the wind tunnel, CFMI chose to flight-test chevrons built into the core exhaust nozzle. The chevrons reduced jet noise by 1.3 perceived loudness decibels during takeoff conditions, and are now offered as an option with the CFM56 for the Airbus A321”






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      15












      $begingroup$

      The “toothed” exhaust are called Chevrons and they reduce noise. They are an option on CFM56 equipped A321 aircraft.



      Wikipedia CFM International CFM56



      ”GE and Snecma also tested the effectiveness of chevrons on reducing jet noise. After examining configurations in the wind tunnel, CFMI chose to flight-test chevrons built into the core exhaust nozzle. The chevrons reduced jet noise by 1.3 perceived loudness decibels during takeoff conditions, and are now offered as an option with the CFM56 for the Airbus A321”






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        15












        15








        15





        $begingroup$

        The “toothed” exhaust are called Chevrons and they reduce noise. They are an option on CFM56 equipped A321 aircraft.



        Wikipedia CFM International CFM56



        ”GE and Snecma also tested the effectiveness of chevrons on reducing jet noise. After examining configurations in the wind tunnel, CFMI chose to flight-test chevrons built into the core exhaust nozzle. The chevrons reduced jet noise by 1.3 perceived loudness decibels during takeoff conditions, and are now offered as an option with the CFM56 for the Airbus A321”






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The “toothed” exhaust are called Chevrons and they reduce noise. They are an option on CFM56 equipped A321 aircraft.



        Wikipedia CFM International CFM56



        ”GE and Snecma also tested the effectiveness of chevrons on reducing jet noise. After examining configurations in the wind tunnel, CFMI chose to flight-test chevrons built into the core exhaust nozzle. The chevrons reduced jet noise by 1.3 perceived loudness decibels during takeoff conditions, and are now offered as an option with the CFM56 for the Airbus A321”







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Mike SowsunMike Sowsun

        19k26281




        19k26281























            7












            $begingroup$

            So far my suspicion is that this is the /p option in "CFM International CFM56-5B3/P" as found when I looked up VP-BWN (the aircraft in your picture).
            The useful chart at Wikipedia, as linked by @Mike-Sowsun, does not list the /P option, which would of course complicate the chart. I wonder how many of these minor options are available? Not like I'm in the market.



            More Info:
            Airliners.net was excited about this roughly ten years ago, but the links to explanations have gone dry. So I was happy to see that one intrepid commenter there had done the right thing and produced a quote from the linked material, which I will reproduce here:




            As stated in the article :
            http://www.airbus.com/store/mm_repos...dia_object_file_FAST37_p19_p22.pdf



            The "noise package" is now standard on the A321 and an option on the
            other models. The reason behind this is that the A321 (heavy weight
            version) doesn't comply with the new stage 4 noise limits in effect
            for all new aircraft, certified after 1 January 2007. In fact this is
            the present noise standard, although legally not valid for the present
            A320 generation of aircraft, all certified before 1 januari 2007. All
            other sub types of the A320 series are at or below the stage 4 noise
            standard and don't need the chevrons, but can be delivered as an
            option with this "noise package", to become even more silent.



            Also stated in the article is the fact that the FADEC needs some
            tweaking to produce the same thrust level, so there must be a loss in
            efficiency somewhere. Because this is an Airbus brochure, nothing is
            said about the actual loss in SFC.




            Here's a similar explanation (again, without specific model number) from a 2002 GE press release:




            All CFM-powered A320 family aircraft meet current FAR Stage III noise
            requirements with significant margin. These engines also meet the CAEP
            5 recommendations, except for the CFM56-5B-powered A321. However, CFM
            and Airbus have defined an acoustic package to ensure this aircraft
            will operate well within proposed limits. CFM is conducting
            development testing on engine and nacelle treatments that will reduce
            the cumulative noise signature at least 10 EPNdB (effective perceived
            noise in decibels) below Stage III levels.



            The new technology includes three-dimensional aerodynamic designed
            outlet guide vanes; a core chevron nozzle; and improved reverser and
            inlet linings on the nacelle. Flight tests on the A321 are scheduled
            for later this year, followed by certification and entry into service
            in early 2003.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Thanks for the detailed explanation.
              $endgroup$
              – Miyo Hazuki
              20 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              You can see chevrons on B-787 engines too.
              $endgroup$
              – Anthony X
              16 hours ago
















            7












            $begingroup$

            So far my suspicion is that this is the /p option in "CFM International CFM56-5B3/P" as found when I looked up VP-BWN (the aircraft in your picture).
            The useful chart at Wikipedia, as linked by @Mike-Sowsun, does not list the /P option, which would of course complicate the chart. I wonder how many of these minor options are available? Not like I'm in the market.



            More Info:
            Airliners.net was excited about this roughly ten years ago, but the links to explanations have gone dry. So I was happy to see that one intrepid commenter there had done the right thing and produced a quote from the linked material, which I will reproduce here:




            As stated in the article :
            http://www.airbus.com/store/mm_repos...dia_object_file_FAST37_p19_p22.pdf



            The "noise package" is now standard on the A321 and an option on the
            other models. The reason behind this is that the A321 (heavy weight
            version) doesn't comply with the new stage 4 noise limits in effect
            for all new aircraft, certified after 1 January 2007. In fact this is
            the present noise standard, although legally not valid for the present
            A320 generation of aircraft, all certified before 1 januari 2007. All
            other sub types of the A320 series are at or below the stage 4 noise
            standard and don't need the chevrons, but can be delivered as an
            option with this "noise package", to become even more silent.



            Also stated in the article is the fact that the FADEC needs some
            tweaking to produce the same thrust level, so there must be a loss in
            efficiency somewhere. Because this is an Airbus brochure, nothing is
            said about the actual loss in SFC.




            Here's a similar explanation (again, without specific model number) from a 2002 GE press release:




            All CFM-powered A320 family aircraft meet current FAR Stage III noise
            requirements with significant margin. These engines also meet the CAEP
            5 recommendations, except for the CFM56-5B-powered A321. However, CFM
            and Airbus have defined an acoustic package to ensure this aircraft
            will operate well within proposed limits. CFM is conducting
            development testing on engine and nacelle treatments that will reduce
            the cumulative noise signature at least 10 EPNdB (effective perceived
            noise in decibels) below Stage III levels.



            The new technology includes three-dimensional aerodynamic designed
            outlet guide vanes; a core chevron nozzle; and improved reverser and
            inlet linings on the nacelle. Flight tests on the A321 are scheduled
            for later this year, followed by certification and entry into service
            in early 2003.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Thanks for the detailed explanation.
              $endgroup$
              – Miyo Hazuki
              20 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              You can see chevrons on B-787 engines too.
              $endgroup$
              – Anthony X
              16 hours ago














            7












            7








            7





            $begingroup$

            So far my suspicion is that this is the /p option in "CFM International CFM56-5B3/P" as found when I looked up VP-BWN (the aircraft in your picture).
            The useful chart at Wikipedia, as linked by @Mike-Sowsun, does not list the /P option, which would of course complicate the chart. I wonder how many of these minor options are available? Not like I'm in the market.



            More Info:
            Airliners.net was excited about this roughly ten years ago, but the links to explanations have gone dry. So I was happy to see that one intrepid commenter there had done the right thing and produced a quote from the linked material, which I will reproduce here:




            As stated in the article :
            http://www.airbus.com/store/mm_repos...dia_object_file_FAST37_p19_p22.pdf



            The "noise package" is now standard on the A321 and an option on the
            other models. The reason behind this is that the A321 (heavy weight
            version) doesn't comply with the new stage 4 noise limits in effect
            for all new aircraft, certified after 1 January 2007. In fact this is
            the present noise standard, although legally not valid for the present
            A320 generation of aircraft, all certified before 1 januari 2007. All
            other sub types of the A320 series are at or below the stage 4 noise
            standard and don't need the chevrons, but can be delivered as an
            option with this "noise package", to become even more silent.



            Also stated in the article is the fact that the FADEC needs some
            tweaking to produce the same thrust level, so there must be a loss in
            efficiency somewhere. Because this is an Airbus brochure, nothing is
            said about the actual loss in SFC.




            Here's a similar explanation (again, without specific model number) from a 2002 GE press release:




            All CFM-powered A320 family aircraft meet current FAR Stage III noise
            requirements with significant margin. These engines also meet the CAEP
            5 recommendations, except for the CFM56-5B-powered A321. However, CFM
            and Airbus have defined an acoustic package to ensure this aircraft
            will operate well within proposed limits. CFM is conducting
            development testing on engine and nacelle treatments that will reduce
            the cumulative noise signature at least 10 EPNdB (effective perceived
            noise in decibels) below Stage III levels.



            The new technology includes three-dimensional aerodynamic designed
            outlet guide vanes; a core chevron nozzle; and improved reverser and
            inlet linings on the nacelle. Flight tests on the A321 are scheduled
            for later this year, followed by certification and entry into service
            in early 2003.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            So far my suspicion is that this is the /p option in "CFM International CFM56-5B3/P" as found when I looked up VP-BWN (the aircraft in your picture).
            The useful chart at Wikipedia, as linked by @Mike-Sowsun, does not list the /P option, which would of course complicate the chart. I wonder how many of these minor options are available? Not like I'm in the market.



            More Info:
            Airliners.net was excited about this roughly ten years ago, but the links to explanations have gone dry. So I was happy to see that one intrepid commenter there had done the right thing and produced a quote from the linked material, which I will reproduce here:




            As stated in the article :
            http://www.airbus.com/store/mm_repos...dia_object_file_FAST37_p19_p22.pdf



            The "noise package" is now standard on the A321 and an option on the
            other models. The reason behind this is that the A321 (heavy weight
            version) doesn't comply with the new stage 4 noise limits in effect
            for all new aircraft, certified after 1 January 2007. In fact this is
            the present noise standard, although legally not valid for the present
            A320 generation of aircraft, all certified before 1 januari 2007. All
            other sub types of the A320 series are at or below the stage 4 noise
            standard and don't need the chevrons, but can be delivered as an
            option with this "noise package", to become even more silent.



            Also stated in the article is the fact that the FADEC needs some
            tweaking to produce the same thrust level, so there must be a loss in
            efficiency somewhere. Because this is an Airbus brochure, nothing is
            said about the actual loss in SFC.




            Here's a similar explanation (again, without specific model number) from a 2002 GE press release:




            All CFM-powered A320 family aircraft meet current FAR Stage III noise
            requirements with significant margin. These engines also meet the CAEP
            5 recommendations, except for the CFM56-5B-powered A321. However, CFM
            and Airbus have defined an acoustic package to ensure this aircraft
            will operate well within proposed limits. CFM is conducting
            development testing on engine and nacelle treatments that will reduce
            the cumulative noise signature at least 10 EPNdB (effective perceived
            noise in decibels) below Stage III levels.



            The new technology includes three-dimensional aerodynamic designed
            outlet guide vanes; a core chevron nozzle; and improved reverser and
            inlet linings on the nacelle. Flight tests on the A321 are scheduled
            for later this year, followed by certification and entry into service
            in early 2003.








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited yesterday

























            answered yesterday









            Haakon DahlHaakon Dahl

            1813




            1813








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Thanks for the detailed explanation.
              $endgroup$
              – Miyo Hazuki
              20 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              You can see chevrons on B-787 engines too.
              $endgroup$
              – Anthony X
              16 hours ago














            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Thanks for the detailed explanation.
              $endgroup$
              – Miyo Hazuki
              20 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              You can see chevrons on B-787 engines too.
              $endgroup$
              – Anthony X
              16 hours ago








            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – Miyo Hazuki
            20 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – Miyo Hazuki
            20 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            You can see chevrons on B-787 engines too.
            $endgroup$
            – Anthony X
            16 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            You can see chevrons on B-787 engines too.
            $endgroup$
            – Anthony X
            16 hours ago










            Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Miyo Hazuki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59751%2fwhat-is-that-cfm56-with-a-toothed-exhaust-on-an-a321%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

            Alcedinidae

            Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?