Tikz picture of two mathematical functions












1















I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}
begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
addplot[red, ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    2 days ago
















1















I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}
begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
addplot[red, ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    2 days ago














1












1








1


0






I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}
begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
addplot[red, ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?










share|improve this question














I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}
begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
addplot[red, ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?







tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









MarkMark

21616




21616








  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    2 days ago














  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    2 days ago








1




1





Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

– marmot
2 days ago





Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

– marmot
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},
ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});
addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);
addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    2 days ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    2 days ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479823%2ftikz-picture-of-two-mathematical-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},
ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});
addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);
addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    2 days ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    2 days ago
















5














The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},
ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});
addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);
addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    2 days ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    2 days ago














5












5








5







The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},
ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});
addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);
addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},
ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});
addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);
addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









marmotmarmot

109k5136255




109k5136255













  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    2 days ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    2 days ago



















  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    2 days ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    2 days ago

















Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

– Mark
2 days ago





Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

– Mark
2 days ago













@Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

– marmot
2 days ago





@Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

– marmot
2 days ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479823%2ftikz-picture-of-two-mathematical-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]