A sentence from The Economist that I don't understand
Here is a sentence from economy magazine The Economist that I don't understand.
Fully 5.8m more Americans are in work than in December of that year, when the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates. That is two-thirds as many as lost their jobs during the Great Recession.
The italicized sentence is the one that confuses me. Shouldn't it be "That is two-thirds as many as those who lost their jobs during the Great Recession?"
I hardly believe The Economist made a mistake in that sentence. Can anyone tell me why the sentence is correct as it is and, if there is any, what words might have been omitted from that sentence?
Thank you.
grammar
New contributor
San Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Here is a sentence from economy magazine The Economist that I don't understand.
Fully 5.8m more Americans are in work than in December of that year, when the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates. That is two-thirds as many as lost their jobs during the Great Recession.
The italicized sentence is the one that confuses me. Shouldn't it be "That is two-thirds as many as those who lost their jobs during the Great Recession?"
I hardly believe The Economist made a mistake in that sentence. Can anyone tell me why the sentence is correct as it is and, if there is any, what words might have been omitted from that sentence?
Thank you.
grammar
New contributor
San Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Could you cite the Economist article link?
– Lordology
Jan 5 at 10:20
economist.com/united-states/2018/07/12/…
– San Kim
Jan 5 at 10:42
add a comment |
Here is a sentence from economy magazine The Economist that I don't understand.
Fully 5.8m more Americans are in work than in December of that year, when the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates. That is two-thirds as many as lost their jobs during the Great Recession.
The italicized sentence is the one that confuses me. Shouldn't it be "That is two-thirds as many as those who lost their jobs during the Great Recession?"
I hardly believe The Economist made a mistake in that sentence. Can anyone tell me why the sentence is correct as it is and, if there is any, what words might have been omitted from that sentence?
Thank you.
grammar
New contributor
San Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Here is a sentence from economy magazine The Economist that I don't understand.
Fully 5.8m more Americans are in work than in December of that year, when the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates. That is two-thirds as many as lost their jobs during the Great Recession.
The italicized sentence is the one that confuses me. Shouldn't it be "That is two-thirds as many as those who lost their jobs during the Great Recession?"
I hardly believe The Economist made a mistake in that sentence. Can anyone tell me why the sentence is correct as it is and, if there is any, what words might have been omitted from that sentence?
Thank you.
grammar
grammar
New contributor
San Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
San Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Jan 5 at 10:47
Tushar Raj
18.6k864112
18.6k864112
New contributor
San Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 5 at 10:13
San KimSan Kim
161
161
New contributor
San Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
San Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
San Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Could you cite the Economist article link?
– Lordology
Jan 5 at 10:20
economist.com/united-states/2018/07/12/…
– San Kim
Jan 5 at 10:42
add a comment |
1
Could you cite the Economist article link?
– Lordology
Jan 5 at 10:20
economist.com/united-states/2018/07/12/…
– San Kim
Jan 5 at 10:42
1
1
Could you cite the Economist article link?
– Lordology
Jan 5 at 10:20
Could you cite the Economist article link?
– Lordology
Jan 5 at 10:20
economist.com/united-states/2018/07/12/…
– San Kim
Jan 5 at 10:42
economist.com/united-states/2018/07/12/…
– San Kim
Jan 5 at 10:42
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
as2 Adverb
1.1 Used to emphasize an amount.
'as many as twenty-two rare species may be at risk'
OOD
Looks proper to me.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
San Kim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479976%2fa-sentence-from-the-economist-that-i-dont-understand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
as2 Adverb
1.1 Used to emphasize an amount.
'as many as twenty-two rare species may be at risk'
OOD
Looks proper to me.
add a comment |
as2 Adverb
1.1 Used to emphasize an amount.
'as many as twenty-two rare species may be at risk'
OOD
Looks proper to me.
add a comment |
as2 Adverb
1.1 Used to emphasize an amount.
'as many as twenty-two rare species may be at risk'
OOD
Looks proper to me.
as2 Adverb
1.1 Used to emphasize an amount.
'as many as twenty-two rare species may be at risk'
OOD
Looks proper to me.
answered 14 hours ago
MikeJRamsey56MikeJRamsey56
2,224313
2,224313
add a comment |
add a comment |
San Kim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
San Kim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
San Kim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
San Kim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479976%2fa-sentence-from-the-economist-that-i-dont-understand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Could you cite the Economist article link?
– Lordology
Jan 5 at 10:20
economist.com/united-states/2018/07/12/…
– San Kim
Jan 5 at 10:42