Google Action Webhook Implementation





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1















so I just started working on a project. I came across two different implementation of webhook for Google action agent. Can someone please explain, what is the difference between both?



Also which one is more extensible.



First one uses actions-on-google library,



'use strict';
// Imports
// =================================================================================================
const { dialogflow } = require('actions-on-google');
const functions = require('firebase-functions');

// Constants
// =================================================================================================
// Instantiate the Dialogflow client with debug logging enabled.
const app = dialogflow({ debug: true });

// Intents
// =================================================================================================
app.intent('welcome.intent', (conv) => {
conv.ask('Hello from webhook');
});

exports.dialogflowFirebaseFulfillment = functions.https.onRequest(app);


and second one uses dialogflow-fulfillment,



`'use strict'`;

const functions = require('firebase-functions');
const { WebhookClient } = require('dialogflow-fulfillment');

process.env.DEBUG = 'dialogflow:debug'; // enables lib debugging statements

exports.dialogflowFirebaseFulfillment = functions.https.onRequest((request, response) => {
const agent = new WebhookClient({ request, response });
console.log('Dialogflow Request headers: ' + JSON.stringify(request.headers));
console.log('Dialogflow Request body: ' + JSON.stringify(request.body));

function welcome(agent) {
agent.add(`Hello from webhook agent`);
}

let intentMap = new Map();
intentMap.set('welcome.intent', welcome);
agent.handleRequest(intentMap);
});









share|improve this question































    1















    so I just started working on a project. I came across two different implementation of webhook for Google action agent. Can someone please explain, what is the difference between both?



    Also which one is more extensible.



    First one uses actions-on-google library,



    'use strict';
    // Imports
    // =================================================================================================
    const { dialogflow } = require('actions-on-google');
    const functions = require('firebase-functions');

    // Constants
    // =================================================================================================
    // Instantiate the Dialogflow client with debug logging enabled.
    const app = dialogflow({ debug: true });

    // Intents
    // =================================================================================================
    app.intent('welcome.intent', (conv) => {
    conv.ask('Hello from webhook');
    });

    exports.dialogflowFirebaseFulfillment = functions.https.onRequest(app);


    and second one uses dialogflow-fulfillment,



    `'use strict'`;

    const functions = require('firebase-functions');
    const { WebhookClient } = require('dialogflow-fulfillment');

    process.env.DEBUG = 'dialogflow:debug'; // enables lib debugging statements

    exports.dialogflowFirebaseFulfillment = functions.https.onRequest((request, response) => {
    const agent = new WebhookClient({ request, response });
    console.log('Dialogflow Request headers: ' + JSON.stringify(request.headers));
    console.log('Dialogflow Request body: ' + JSON.stringify(request.body));

    function welcome(agent) {
    agent.add(`Hello from webhook agent`);
    }

    let intentMap = new Map();
    intentMap.set('welcome.intent', welcome);
    agent.handleRequest(intentMap);
    });









    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1








      so I just started working on a project. I came across two different implementation of webhook for Google action agent. Can someone please explain, what is the difference between both?



      Also which one is more extensible.



      First one uses actions-on-google library,



      'use strict';
      // Imports
      // =================================================================================================
      const { dialogflow } = require('actions-on-google');
      const functions = require('firebase-functions');

      // Constants
      // =================================================================================================
      // Instantiate the Dialogflow client with debug logging enabled.
      const app = dialogflow({ debug: true });

      // Intents
      // =================================================================================================
      app.intent('welcome.intent', (conv) => {
      conv.ask('Hello from webhook');
      });

      exports.dialogflowFirebaseFulfillment = functions.https.onRequest(app);


      and second one uses dialogflow-fulfillment,



      `'use strict'`;

      const functions = require('firebase-functions');
      const { WebhookClient } = require('dialogflow-fulfillment');

      process.env.DEBUG = 'dialogflow:debug'; // enables lib debugging statements

      exports.dialogflowFirebaseFulfillment = functions.https.onRequest((request, response) => {
      const agent = new WebhookClient({ request, response });
      console.log('Dialogflow Request headers: ' + JSON.stringify(request.headers));
      console.log('Dialogflow Request body: ' + JSON.stringify(request.body));

      function welcome(agent) {
      agent.add(`Hello from webhook agent`);
      }

      let intentMap = new Map();
      intentMap.set('welcome.intent', welcome);
      agent.handleRequest(intentMap);
      });









      share|improve this question
















      so I just started working on a project. I came across two different implementation of webhook for Google action agent. Can someone please explain, what is the difference between both?



      Also which one is more extensible.



      First one uses actions-on-google library,



      'use strict';
      // Imports
      // =================================================================================================
      const { dialogflow } = require('actions-on-google');
      const functions = require('firebase-functions');

      // Constants
      // =================================================================================================
      // Instantiate the Dialogflow client with debug logging enabled.
      const app = dialogflow({ debug: true });

      // Intents
      // =================================================================================================
      app.intent('welcome.intent', (conv) => {
      conv.ask('Hello from webhook');
      });

      exports.dialogflowFirebaseFulfillment = functions.https.onRequest(app);


      and second one uses dialogflow-fulfillment,



      `'use strict'`;

      const functions = require('firebase-functions');
      const { WebhookClient } = require('dialogflow-fulfillment');

      process.env.DEBUG = 'dialogflow:debug'; // enables lib debugging statements

      exports.dialogflowFirebaseFulfillment = functions.https.onRequest((request, response) => {
      const agent = new WebhookClient({ request, response });
      console.log('Dialogflow Request headers: ' + JSON.stringify(request.headers));
      console.log('Dialogflow Request body: ' + JSON.stringify(request.body));

      function welcome(agent) {
      agent.add(`Hello from webhook agent`);
      }

      let intentMap = new Map();
      intentMap.set('welcome.intent', welcome);
      agent.handleRequest(intentMap);
      });






      node.js webhooks dialogflow actions-on-google






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 23 '18 at 13:37







      ahmadabdullah247

















      asked Nov 23 '18 at 13:31









      ahmadabdullah247ahmadabdullah247

      111112




      111112
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Both libraries are valid and supported by Google. Which one you use depends on what your goals are.



          The actions-on-google library is best if your goal is only to develop Actions. It has support for some of the more advanced functions supported by the AoG platform, but does not support the other platforms that Dialogflow supports.



          The dialogflow-fulfillment library is best if you want to support multiple bot platforms using Dialogflow (possibly including the Actions on Google platform).






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53447656%2fgoogle-action-webhook-implementation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Both libraries are valid and supported by Google. Which one you use depends on what your goals are.



            The actions-on-google library is best if your goal is only to develop Actions. It has support for some of the more advanced functions supported by the AoG platform, but does not support the other platforms that Dialogflow supports.



            The dialogflow-fulfillment library is best if you want to support multiple bot platforms using Dialogflow (possibly including the Actions on Google platform).






            share|improve this answer




























              1














              Both libraries are valid and supported by Google. Which one you use depends on what your goals are.



              The actions-on-google library is best if your goal is only to develop Actions. It has support for some of the more advanced functions supported by the AoG platform, but does not support the other platforms that Dialogflow supports.



              The dialogflow-fulfillment library is best if you want to support multiple bot platforms using Dialogflow (possibly including the Actions on Google platform).






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                Both libraries are valid and supported by Google. Which one you use depends on what your goals are.



                The actions-on-google library is best if your goal is only to develop Actions. It has support for some of the more advanced functions supported by the AoG platform, but does not support the other platforms that Dialogflow supports.



                The dialogflow-fulfillment library is best if you want to support multiple bot platforms using Dialogflow (possibly including the Actions on Google platform).






                share|improve this answer













                Both libraries are valid and supported by Google. Which one you use depends on what your goals are.



                The actions-on-google library is best if your goal is only to develop Actions. It has support for some of the more advanced functions supported by the AoG platform, but does not support the other platforms that Dialogflow supports.



                The dialogflow-fulfillment library is best if you want to support multiple bot platforms using Dialogflow (possibly including the Actions on Google platform).







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 23 '18 at 13:37









                PrisonerPrisoner

                36.2k33562




                36.2k33562
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53447656%2fgoogle-action-webhook-implementation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                    Alcedinidae

                    RAC Tourist Trophy