Serializable range deadlocks












4














Help required on an inherited deadlock problem!



The code given below appears to have been written some time back, in an attempt to address contention issues around the assigning of new ID values on a much larger/fatter [IDs] parent table, by first creating the identity values in a smaller [ID_Stub] table. However, the presence of continued deadlocks indicates that this code appears to be causing more problems than it is solving.



We frequently experience deadlocks around an INSERT statement on the following table (table and column names have been obfuscated). The table has no triggers or foreign key dependencies, but has a clustered and a non-clustered index as follows.



CREATE TABLE dbo.ID_Stub (
ID int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
IDReference nchar(25) NULL,
AdditionalID int NULL,
CreatedBy int NOT NULL,
CreatedOn datetime NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT PK_ID_Stub PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (ID) WITH
(
PAD_INDEX = OFF,
STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF,
IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF,
ONLINE = OFF,
ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON,
ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON,
FILLFACTOR = 90
)
);
GO

CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_IDReference ON dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference) WITH
(
PAD_INDEX = OFF,
STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF,
DROP_EXISTING = OFF,
ONLINE = OFF,
ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON,
ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON,
FILLFACTOR = 70
);
GO


The table contains an average of around 70,000 rows at any one time (a process runs to trim the number of records nightly).



The default instance transaction isolation level is READ COMMITTED, however this is overridden (in the stored procedure where the deadlocks occur) to SERIALIZABLE, along with an implicit transaction. Unfortunately, we cannot consider moving to an optimising locking strategy such as RCSI at this stage.



The whole implicit transaction has been given below for completeness, but the deadlocks are occurring around the final INSERT statement on ID_Stub towards the end.



SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
BEGIN TRANSACTION

-- If a reference has been provided...
IF ISNULL(@IDReference, '') > ''
BEGIN
IF @ID IS NULL
BEGIN
-- Attempt to locate record based on provided reference.
SELECT @ID = MAX(ID)
FROM dbo.IDs I
WHERE I.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
AND I.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID

IF @ID IS NULL
BEGIN
-- If there is no corresponding record, the subsequent ID creation after the stub failed.
SET @OriginallyCreated =
(
SELECT MAX(CreatedOn)
FROM dbo.ID_Stub IDS
WHERE IDS.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
AND IDS.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
AND IDS.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID
);

-- Delete the stub record if created more than 90 seconds ago.
IF @OriginallyCreated IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
IF DATEDIFF(s, @OriginallyCreated, GETDATE()) < 90
SELECT @FailureMessage = 'The ID for reference ' + RTRIM(@IDReference) + ' is still being processed. Please try later.';
ELSE
DELETE dbo.ID_Stub
WHERE IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
AND CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
AND AdditionalID = @AdditionalID;
END
END
END
ELSE
BEGIN
IF NOT EXISTS
(
SELECT ID
FROM dbo.IDs I
WHERE I.ID = @ID
AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
)
SELECT @FailureMessage = 'You have no record stored against the supplied ID (' + RTRIM(CONVERT(Char, @ID)) + ')';
ELSE
IF NOT EXISTS
(
SELECT ID
FROM dbo.IDs I
WHERE I.ID = @ID
AND I.IDReference = @IDReference
AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
)
SELECT @FailureMessage = 'The ID does not match the reference you supplied.';
END
END
ELSE -- No ID Reference provided.
BEGIN
IF @ID IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
IF NOT EXISTS
(
SELECT ID
FROM dbo.IDs I
WHERE I.ID = @ID
AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
)
SELECT @FailureMessage = 'You have no record stored against the supplied ID (' + RTRIM(CONVERT(Char, @ID)) + ').';
END
END

IF @FailureMessage <> ''
BEGIN
ROLLBACK;
RETURN 1;
END

-- If it's a new submission, create a stub for it.
IF @ID IS NULL
BEGIN
INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn)
VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE());

SELECT @ID = SCOPE_IDENTITY();
END

COMMIT
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED;


The XML deadlock report is as follows.



<deadlock>
<victim-list>
<victimProcess id="process1e7fd5d8108"/>
</victim-list>
<process-list>
<process id="process1e7fd5d8108" taskpriority="0" logused="336" waitresource="KEY: 30:72057596372844544 (4f8ff66d381b)" waittime="4265" ownerId="1879373839" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.357" XDES="0x1dfe81c9538" lockMode="RangeI-N" schedulerid="6" kpid="2084" status="suspended" spid="182" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="2" lastbatchstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.307" lastbatchcompleted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.293" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.293" clientapp=".Net SqlClient Data Provider" hostname="<obfuscated>" hostpid="3648" loginname="<obfuscated>" isolationlevel="serializable (4)" xactid="1879373839" currentdb="30" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671088672" clientoption2="128056">
<executionStack>
<frame procname="<obfuscated>" line="640" stmtstart="68006" stmtend="68296" sqlhandle="0x03001e002acd7f07eca57a012ea9000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"> INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn) VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE(); </frame>
</executionStack>
<inputbuf> Proc [Database Id = 30 Object Id = 125816106] </inputbuf>
</process>
<process id="process1fd327c7c28" taskpriority="0" logused="336" waitresource="KEY: 30:72057596372844544 (4f8ff66d381b)" waittime="4265" ownerId="1879373837" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.357" XDES="0x1e76d97ebd8" lockMode="RangeI-N" schedulerid="3" kpid="9084" status="suspended" spid="208" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="2" lastbatchstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.300" lastbatchcompleted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.293" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.293" clientapp=".Net SqlClient Data Provider" hostname="<obfuscated>" hostpid="3648" loginname="<obfuscated>" isolationlevel="serializable (4)" xactid="1879373837" currentdb="30" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671088672" clientoption2="128056">
<executionStack>
<frame procname="<obfuscated>" line="640" stmtstart="68006" stmtend="68296" sqlhandle="0x03001e002acd7f07eca57a012ea9000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"> INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn) VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE(); </frame>
</executionStack>
<inputbuf> Proc [Database Id = 30 Object Id = 125816106] </inputbuf>
</process>
</process-list>
<resource-list>
<keylock hobtid="72057596372844544" dbid="30" objectname="<obfuscated>.<obfuscated>.ID_Stub" indexname="idx_IDReference" id="lock1e566d4a380" mode="RangeS-S" associatedObjectId="72057596372844544">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeS-S"/>
<owner id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
</waiter-list>
</keylock>
<keylock hobtid="72057596372844544" dbid="30" objectname="<obfuscated>.<obfuscated>.ID_Stub" indexname="idx_IDReference" id="lock1e566d4a380" mode="RangeS-S" associatedObjectId="72057596372844544">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeS-S"/>
<owner id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
</waiter-list>
</keylock>
</resource-list>
</deadlock>


The query plan for the first statement can be found at the link below.



https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=BkVfC8qbN



Any tips or advice on how best to tackle these deadlocks would be greatly appreciated.










share|improve this question



























    4














    Help required on an inherited deadlock problem!



    The code given below appears to have been written some time back, in an attempt to address contention issues around the assigning of new ID values on a much larger/fatter [IDs] parent table, by first creating the identity values in a smaller [ID_Stub] table. However, the presence of continued deadlocks indicates that this code appears to be causing more problems than it is solving.



    We frequently experience deadlocks around an INSERT statement on the following table (table and column names have been obfuscated). The table has no triggers or foreign key dependencies, but has a clustered and a non-clustered index as follows.



    CREATE TABLE dbo.ID_Stub (
    ID int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
    IDReference nchar(25) NULL,
    AdditionalID int NULL,
    CreatedBy int NOT NULL,
    CreatedOn datetime NOT NULL,
    CONSTRAINT PK_ID_Stub PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (ID) WITH
    (
    PAD_INDEX = OFF,
    STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
    SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF,
    IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF,
    ONLINE = OFF,
    ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON,
    ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON,
    FILLFACTOR = 90
    )
    );
    GO

    CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_IDReference ON dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference) WITH
    (
    PAD_INDEX = OFF,
    STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
    SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF,
    DROP_EXISTING = OFF,
    ONLINE = OFF,
    ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON,
    ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON,
    FILLFACTOR = 70
    );
    GO


    The table contains an average of around 70,000 rows at any one time (a process runs to trim the number of records nightly).



    The default instance transaction isolation level is READ COMMITTED, however this is overridden (in the stored procedure where the deadlocks occur) to SERIALIZABLE, along with an implicit transaction. Unfortunately, we cannot consider moving to an optimising locking strategy such as RCSI at this stage.



    The whole implicit transaction has been given below for completeness, but the deadlocks are occurring around the final INSERT statement on ID_Stub towards the end.



    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
    BEGIN TRANSACTION

    -- If a reference has been provided...
    IF ISNULL(@IDReference, '') > ''
    BEGIN
    IF @ID IS NULL
    BEGIN
    -- Attempt to locate record based on provided reference.
    SELECT @ID = MAX(ID)
    FROM dbo.IDs I
    WHERE I.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
    AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
    AND I.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID

    IF @ID IS NULL
    BEGIN
    -- If there is no corresponding record, the subsequent ID creation after the stub failed.
    SET @OriginallyCreated =
    (
    SELECT MAX(CreatedOn)
    FROM dbo.ID_Stub IDS
    WHERE IDS.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
    AND IDS.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
    AND IDS.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID
    );

    -- Delete the stub record if created more than 90 seconds ago.
    IF @OriginallyCreated IS NOT NULL
    BEGIN
    IF DATEDIFF(s, @OriginallyCreated, GETDATE()) < 90
    SELECT @FailureMessage = 'The ID for reference ' + RTRIM(@IDReference) + ' is still being processed. Please try later.';
    ELSE
    DELETE dbo.ID_Stub
    WHERE IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
    AND CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
    AND AdditionalID = @AdditionalID;
    END
    END
    END
    ELSE
    BEGIN
    IF NOT EXISTS
    (
    SELECT ID
    FROM dbo.IDs I
    WHERE I.ID = @ID
    AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
    )
    SELECT @FailureMessage = 'You have no record stored against the supplied ID (' + RTRIM(CONVERT(Char, @ID)) + ')';
    ELSE
    IF NOT EXISTS
    (
    SELECT ID
    FROM dbo.IDs I
    WHERE I.ID = @ID
    AND I.IDReference = @IDReference
    AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
    )
    SELECT @FailureMessage = 'The ID does not match the reference you supplied.';
    END
    END
    ELSE -- No ID Reference provided.
    BEGIN
    IF @ID IS NOT NULL
    BEGIN
    IF NOT EXISTS
    (
    SELECT ID
    FROM dbo.IDs I
    WHERE I.ID = @ID
    AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
    )
    SELECT @FailureMessage = 'You have no record stored against the supplied ID (' + RTRIM(CONVERT(Char, @ID)) + ').';
    END
    END

    IF @FailureMessage <> ''
    BEGIN
    ROLLBACK;
    RETURN 1;
    END

    -- If it's a new submission, create a stub for it.
    IF @ID IS NULL
    BEGIN
    INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn)
    VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE());

    SELECT @ID = SCOPE_IDENTITY();
    END

    COMMIT
    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED;


    The XML deadlock report is as follows.



    <deadlock>
    <victim-list>
    <victimProcess id="process1e7fd5d8108"/>
    </victim-list>
    <process-list>
    <process id="process1e7fd5d8108" taskpriority="0" logused="336" waitresource="KEY: 30:72057596372844544 (4f8ff66d381b)" waittime="4265" ownerId="1879373839" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.357" XDES="0x1dfe81c9538" lockMode="RangeI-N" schedulerid="6" kpid="2084" status="suspended" spid="182" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="2" lastbatchstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.307" lastbatchcompleted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.293" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.293" clientapp=".Net SqlClient Data Provider" hostname="<obfuscated>" hostpid="3648" loginname="<obfuscated>" isolationlevel="serializable (4)" xactid="1879373839" currentdb="30" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671088672" clientoption2="128056">
    <executionStack>
    <frame procname="<obfuscated>" line="640" stmtstart="68006" stmtend="68296" sqlhandle="0x03001e002acd7f07eca57a012ea9000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"> INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn) VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE(); </frame>
    </executionStack>
    <inputbuf> Proc [Database Id = 30 Object Id = 125816106] </inputbuf>
    </process>
    <process id="process1fd327c7c28" taskpriority="0" logused="336" waitresource="KEY: 30:72057596372844544 (4f8ff66d381b)" waittime="4265" ownerId="1879373837" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.357" XDES="0x1e76d97ebd8" lockMode="RangeI-N" schedulerid="3" kpid="9084" status="suspended" spid="208" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="2" lastbatchstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.300" lastbatchcompleted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.293" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.293" clientapp=".Net SqlClient Data Provider" hostname="<obfuscated>" hostpid="3648" loginname="<obfuscated>" isolationlevel="serializable (4)" xactid="1879373837" currentdb="30" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671088672" clientoption2="128056">
    <executionStack>
    <frame procname="<obfuscated>" line="640" stmtstart="68006" stmtend="68296" sqlhandle="0x03001e002acd7f07eca57a012ea9000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"> INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn) VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE(); </frame>
    </executionStack>
    <inputbuf> Proc [Database Id = 30 Object Id = 125816106] </inputbuf>
    </process>
    </process-list>
    <resource-list>
    <keylock hobtid="72057596372844544" dbid="30" objectname="<obfuscated>.<obfuscated>.ID_Stub" indexname="idx_IDReference" id="lock1e566d4a380" mode="RangeS-S" associatedObjectId="72057596372844544">
    <owner-list>
    <owner id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeS-S"/>
    <owner id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
    </owner-list>
    <waiter-list>
    <waiter id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
    </waiter-list>
    </keylock>
    <keylock hobtid="72057596372844544" dbid="30" objectname="<obfuscated>.<obfuscated>.ID_Stub" indexname="idx_IDReference" id="lock1e566d4a380" mode="RangeS-S" associatedObjectId="72057596372844544">
    <owner-list>
    <owner id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeS-S"/>
    <owner id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
    </owner-list>
    <waiter-list>
    <waiter id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
    </waiter-list>
    </keylock>
    </resource-list>
    </deadlock>


    The query plan for the first statement can be found at the link below.



    https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=BkVfC8qbN



    Any tips or advice on how best to tackle these deadlocks would be greatly appreciated.










    share|improve this question

























      4












      4








      4


      1





      Help required on an inherited deadlock problem!



      The code given below appears to have been written some time back, in an attempt to address contention issues around the assigning of new ID values on a much larger/fatter [IDs] parent table, by first creating the identity values in a smaller [ID_Stub] table. However, the presence of continued deadlocks indicates that this code appears to be causing more problems than it is solving.



      We frequently experience deadlocks around an INSERT statement on the following table (table and column names have been obfuscated). The table has no triggers or foreign key dependencies, but has a clustered and a non-clustered index as follows.



      CREATE TABLE dbo.ID_Stub (
      ID int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
      IDReference nchar(25) NULL,
      AdditionalID int NULL,
      CreatedBy int NOT NULL,
      CreatedOn datetime NOT NULL,
      CONSTRAINT PK_ID_Stub PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (ID) WITH
      (
      PAD_INDEX = OFF,
      STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
      SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF,
      IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF,
      ONLINE = OFF,
      ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON,
      ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON,
      FILLFACTOR = 90
      )
      );
      GO

      CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_IDReference ON dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference) WITH
      (
      PAD_INDEX = OFF,
      STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
      SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF,
      DROP_EXISTING = OFF,
      ONLINE = OFF,
      ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON,
      ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON,
      FILLFACTOR = 70
      );
      GO


      The table contains an average of around 70,000 rows at any one time (a process runs to trim the number of records nightly).



      The default instance transaction isolation level is READ COMMITTED, however this is overridden (in the stored procedure where the deadlocks occur) to SERIALIZABLE, along with an implicit transaction. Unfortunately, we cannot consider moving to an optimising locking strategy such as RCSI at this stage.



      The whole implicit transaction has been given below for completeness, but the deadlocks are occurring around the final INSERT statement on ID_Stub towards the end.



      SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
      BEGIN TRANSACTION

      -- If a reference has been provided...
      IF ISNULL(@IDReference, '') > ''
      BEGIN
      IF @ID IS NULL
      BEGIN
      -- Attempt to locate record based on provided reference.
      SELECT @ID = MAX(ID)
      FROM dbo.IDs I
      WHERE I.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
      AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      AND I.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID

      IF @ID IS NULL
      BEGIN
      -- If there is no corresponding record, the subsequent ID creation after the stub failed.
      SET @OriginallyCreated =
      (
      SELECT MAX(CreatedOn)
      FROM dbo.ID_Stub IDS
      WHERE IDS.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
      AND IDS.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      AND IDS.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID
      );

      -- Delete the stub record if created more than 90 seconds ago.
      IF @OriginallyCreated IS NOT NULL
      BEGIN
      IF DATEDIFF(s, @OriginallyCreated, GETDATE()) < 90
      SELECT @FailureMessage = 'The ID for reference ' + RTRIM(@IDReference) + ' is still being processed. Please try later.';
      ELSE
      DELETE dbo.ID_Stub
      WHERE IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
      AND CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      AND AdditionalID = @AdditionalID;
      END
      END
      END
      ELSE
      BEGIN
      IF NOT EXISTS
      (
      SELECT ID
      FROM dbo.IDs I
      WHERE I.ID = @ID
      AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      )
      SELECT @FailureMessage = 'You have no record stored against the supplied ID (' + RTRIM(CONVERT(Char, @ID)) + ')';
      ELSE
      IF NOT EXISTS
      (
      SELECT ID
      FROM dbo.IDs I
      WHERE I.ID = @ID
      AND I.IDReference = @IDReference
      AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      )
      SELECT @FailureMessage = 'The ID does not match the reference you supplied.';
      END
      END
      ELSE -- No ID Reference provided.
      BEGIN
      IF @ID IS NOT NULL
      BEGIN
      IF NOT EXISTS
      (
      SELECT ID
      FROM dbo.IDs I
      WHERE I.ID = @ID
      AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      )
      SELECT @FailureMessage = 'You have no record stored against the supplied ID (' + RTRIM(CONVERT(Char, @ID)) + ').';
      END
      END

      IF @FailureMessage <> ''
      BEGIN
      ROLLBACK;
      RETURN 1;
      END

      -- If it's a new submission, create a stub for it.
      IF @ID IS NULL
      BEGIN
      INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn)
      VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE());

      SELECT @ID = SCOPE_IDENTITY();
      END

      COMMIT
      SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED;


      The XML deadlock report is as follows.



      <deadlock>
      <victim-list>
      <victimProcess id="process1e7fd5d8108"/>
      </victim-list>
      <process-list>
      <process id="process1e7fd5d8108" taskpriority="0" logused="336" waitresource="KEY: 30:72057596372844544 (4f8ff66d381b)" waittime="4265" ownerId="1879373839" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.357" XDES="0x1dfe81c9538" lockMode="RangeI-N" schedulerid="6" kpid="2084" status="suspended" spid="182" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="2" lastbatchstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.307" lastbatchcompleted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.293" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.293" clientapp=".Net SqlClient Data Provider" hostname="<obfuscated>" hostpid="3648" loginname="<obfuscated>" isolationlevel="serializable (4)" xactid="1879373839" currentdb="30" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671088672" clientoption2="128056">
      <executionStack>
      <frame procname="<obfuscated>" line="640" stmtstart="68006" stmtend="68296" sqlhandle="0x03001e002acd7f07eca57a012ea9000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"> INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn) VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE(); </frame>
      </executionStack>
      <inputbuf> Proc [Database Id = 30 Object Id = 125816106] </inputbuf>
      </process>
      <process id="process1fd327c7c28" taskpriority="0" logused="336" waitresource="KEY: 30:72057596372844544 (4f8ff66d381b)" waittime="4265" ownerId="1879373837" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.357" XDES="0x1e76d97ebd8" lockMode="RangeI-N" schedulerid="3" kpid="9084" status="suspended" spid="208" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="2" lastbatchstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.300" lastbatchcompleted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.293" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.293" clientapp=".Net SqlClient Data Provider" hostname="<obfuscated>" hostpid="3648" loginname="<obfuscated>" isolationlevel="serializable (4)" xactid="1879373837" currentdb="30" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671088672" clientoption2="128056">
      <executionStack>
      <frame procname="<obfuscated>" line="640" stmtstart="68006" stmtend="68296" sqlhandle="0x03001e002acd7f07eca57a012ea9000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"> INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn) VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE(); </frame>
      </executionStack>
      <inputbuf> Proc [Database Id = 30 Object Id = 125816106] </inputbuf>
      </process>
      </process-list>
      <resource-list>
      <keylock hobtid="72057596372844544" dbid="30" objectname="<obfuscated>.<obfuscated>.ID_Stub" indexname="idx_IDReference" id="lock1e566d4a380" mode="RangeS-S" associatedObjectId="72057596372844544">
      <owner-list>
      <owner id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeS-S"/>
      <owner id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
      </owner-list>
      <waiter-list>
      <waiter id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
      </waiter-list>
      </keylock>
      <keylock hobtid="72057596372844544" dbid="30" objectname="<obfuscated>.<obfuscated>.ID_Stub" indexname="idx_IDReference" id="lock1e566d4a380" mode="RangeS-S" associatedObjectId="72057596372844544">
      <owner-list>
      <owner id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeS-S"/>
      <owner id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
      </owner-list>
      <waiter-list>
      <waiter id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
      </waiter-list>
      </keylock>
      </resource-list>
      </deadlock>


      The query plan for the first statement can be found at the link below.



      https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=BkVfC8qbN



      Any tips or advice on how best to tackle these deadlocks would be greatly appreciated.










      share|improve this question













      Help required on an inherited deadlock problem!



      The code given below appears to have been written some time back, in an attempt to address contention issues around the assigning of new ID values on a much larger/fatter [IDs] parent table, by first creating the identity values in a smaller [ID_Stub] table. However, the presence of continued deadlocks indicates that this code appears to be causing more problems than it is solving.



      We frequently experience deadlocks around an INSERT statement on the following table (table and column names have been obfuscated). The table has no triggers or foreign key dependencies, but has a clustered and a non-clustered index as follows.



      CREATE TABLE dbo.ID_Stub (
      ID int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
      IDReference nchar(25) NULL,
      AdditionalID int NULL,
      CreatedBy int NOT NULL,
      CreatedOn datetime NOT NULL,
      CONSTRAINT PK_ID_Stub PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (ID) WITH
      (
      PAD_INDEX = OFF,
      STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
      SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF,
      IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF,
      ONLINE = OFF,
      ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON,
      ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON,
      FILLFACTOR = 90
      )
      );
      GO

      CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_IDReference ON dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference) WITH
      (
      PAD_INDEX = OFF,
      STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF,
      SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF,
      DROP_EXISTING = OFF,
      ONLINE = OFF,
      ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON,
      ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON,
      FILLFACTOR = 70
      );
      GO


      The table contains an average of around 70,000 rows at any one time (a process runs to trim the number of records nightly).



      The default instance transaction isolation level is READ COMMITTED, however this is overridden (in the stored procedure where the deadlocks occur) to SERIALIZABLE, along with an implicit transaction. Unfortunately, we cannot consider moving to an optimising locking strategy such as RCSI at this stage.



      The whole implicit transaction has been given below for completeness, but the deadlocks are occurring around the final INSERT statement on ID_Stub towards the end.



      SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
      BEGIN TRANSACTION

      -- If a reference has been provided...
      IF ISNULL(@IDReference, '') > ''
      BEGIN
      IF @ID IS NULL
      BEGIN
      -- Attempt to locate record based on provided reference.
      SELECT @ID = MAX(ID)
      FROM dbo.IDs I
      WHERE I.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
      AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      AND I.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID

      IF @ID IS NULL
      BEGIN
      -- If there is no corresponding record, the subsequent ID creation after the stub failed.
      SET @OriginallyCreated =
      (
      SELECT MAX(CreatedOn)
      FROM dbo.ID_Stub IDS
      WHERE IDS.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
      AND IDS.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      AND IDS.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID
      );

      -- Delete the stub record if created more than 90 seconds ago.
      IF @OriginallyCreated IS NOT NULL
      BEGIN
      IF DATEDIFF(s, @OriginallyCreated, GETDATE()) < 90
      SELECT @FailureMessage = 'The ID for reference ' + RTRIM(@IDReference) + ' is still being processed. Please try later.';
      ELSE
      DELETE dbo.ID_Stub
      WHERE IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
      AND CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      AND AdditionalID = @AdditionalID;
      END
      END
      END
      ELSE
      BEGIN
      IF NOT EXISTS
      (
      SELECT ID
      FROM dbo.IDs I
      WHERE I.ID = @ID
      AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      )
      SELECT @FailureMessage = 'You have no record stored against the supplied ID (' + RTRIM(CONVERT(Char, @ID)) + ')';
      ELSE
      IF NOT EXISTS
      (
      SELECT ID
      FROM dbo.IDs I
      WHERE I.ID = @ID
      AND I.IDReference = @IDReference
      AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      )
      SELECT @FailureMessage = 'The ID does not match the reference you supplied.';
      END
      END
      ELSE -- No ID Reference provided.
      BEGIN
      IF @ID IS NOT NULL
      BEGIN
      IF NOT EXISTS
      (
      SELECT ID
      FROM dbo.IDs I
      WHERE I.ID = @ID
      AND I.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
      )
      SELECT @FailureMessage = 'You have no record stored against the supplied ID (' + RTRIM(CONVERT(Char, @ID)) + ').';
      END
      END

      IF @FailureMessage <> ''
      BEGIN
      ROLLBACK;
      RETURN 1;
      END

      -- If it's a new submission, create a stub for it.
      IF @ID IS NULL
      BEGIN
      INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn)
      VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE());

      SELECT @ID = SCOPE_IDENTITY();
      END

      COMMIT
      SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED;


      The XML deadlock report is as follows.



      <deadlock>
      <victim-list>
      <victimProcess id="process1e7fd5d8108"/>
      </victim-list>
      <process-list>
      <process id="process1e7fd5d8108" taskpriority="0" logused="336" waitresource="KEY: 30:72057596372844544 (4f8ff66d381b)" waittime="4265" ownerId="1879373839" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.357" XDES="0x1dfe81c9538" lockMode="RangeI-N" schedulerid="6" kpid="2084" status="suspended" spid="182" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="2" lastbatchstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.307" lastbatchcompleted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.293" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.293" clientapp=".Net SqlClient Data Provider" hostname="<obfuscated>" hostpid="3648" loginname="<obfuscated>" isolationlevel="serializable (4)" xactid="1879373839" currentdb="30" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671088672" clientoption2="128056">
      <executionStack>
      <frame procname="<obfuscated>" line="640" stmtstart="68006" stmtend="68296" sqlhandle="0x03001e002acd7f07eca57a012ea9000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"> INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn) VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE(); </frame>
      </executionStack>
      <inputbuf> Proc [Database Id = 30 Object Id = 125816106] </inputbuf>
      </process>
      <process id="process1fd327c7c28" taskpriority="0" logused="336" waitresource="KEY: 30:72057596372844544 (4f8ff66d381b)" waittime="4265" ownerId="1879373837" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.357" XDES="0x1e76d97ebd8" lockMode="RangeI-N" schedulerid="3" kpid="9084" status="suspended" spid="208" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="2" lastbatchstarted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.300" lastbatchcompleted="2018-12-29T22:19:51.293" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.293" clientapp=".Net SqlClient Data Provider" hostname="<obfuscated>" hostpid="3648" loginname="<obfuscated>" isolationlevel="serializable (4)" xactid="1879373837" currentdb="30" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671088672" clientoption2="128056">
      <executionStack>
      <frame procname="<obfuscated>" line="640" stmtstart="68006" stmtend="68296" sqlhandle="0x03001e002acd7f07eca57a012ea9000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"> INSERT dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, AdditionalID, CreatedBy, CreatedOn) VALUES (@IDReference, @AdditionalID, @CreatedBy, GETDATE(); </frame>
      </executionStack>
      <inputbuf> Proc [Database Id = 30 Object Id = 125816106] </inputbuf>
      </process>
      </process-list>
      <resource-list>
      <keylock hobtid="72057596372844544" dbid="30" objectname="<obfuscated>.<obfuscated>.ID_Stub" indexname="idx_IDReference" id="lock1e566d4a380" mode="RangeS-S" associatedObjectId="72057596372844544">
      <owner-list>
      <owner id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeS-S"/>
      <owner id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
      </owner-list>
      <waiter-list>
      <waiter id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
      </waiter-list>
      </keylock>
      <keylock hobtid="72057596372844544" dbid="30" objectname="<obfuscated>.<obfuscated>.ID_Stub" indexname="idx_IDReference" id="lock1e566d4a380" mode="RangeS-S" associatedObjectId="72057596372844544">
      <owner-list>
      <owner id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeS-S"/>
      <owner id="process1e7fd5d8108" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
      </owner-list>
      <waiter-list>
      <waiter id="process1fd327c7c28" mode="RangeI-N" requestType="convert"/>
      </waiter-list>
      </keylock>
      </resource-list>
      </deadlock>


      The query plan for the first statement can be found at the link below.



      https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=BkVfC8qbN



      Any tips or advice on how best to tackle these deadlocks would be greatly appreciated.







      sql-server deadlock identity isolation-level






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 2 at 15:56









      James D

      16118




      16118






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3















          We frequently experience deadlocks around an INSERT statement on the following table
          ...
          the stored procedure where the deadlocks occur [uses] SERIALIZABLE




          Yes. That is the expected behavior of the SERIALIZABLE isolation level. It's not widely understood, but deadlocks are how SERIALIZABLE enforces the isolation level. It doesn't prevent concurrent sessions from attempting to write conflicting changes; if two sessions read data and then both attempt conflicting changes, a deadlock occurs, and only one write succeeds.



          So if you don't want to deal with deadlocks, you're using the wrong concurrency model.



          If you simply want to prevent concurrent execution of this transaction, forcing sessions to execute it one-at-a-time, the simplest way is to use an application lock:



          BEGIN TRANSACTION
          exec sp_getapplock @Resource = 'MyTransaction', @LockMode = 'Exclusive';
          . . .





          share|improve this answer































            1














            You have two queries on the deadlock-affected table that have very similar WHERE clauses. This one:



            SELECT MAX(CreatedOn) 
            FROM dbo.ID_Stub IDS
            WHERE IDS.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
            AND IDS.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
            AND IDS.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID


            And this one:



            DELETE dbo.ID_Stub
            WHERE IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
            AND CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
            AND AdditionalID = @AdditionalID;


            Depending on the data in dbo.ID_Stub, you may be able to reduce the amount of range-locking going on (which is there due to the SERIALIZABLE isolation level, as you mentioned) by adding those other two fields to your nonclustered index key.



            CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_IDReference 
            ON dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, CreatedBy, AdditionalID)
            WITH
            (
            ...all your other options
            );


            If you can't address the underlying problem of having to use the SERIALIZABLE isolation level (David Browne has makes a great suggestion with the getapplock procedure), then this could mitigate the problem at least.



            You can do before and after testing with those specific queries on their own, checking the locks taken with sp_WhoIsActive @get_locks = 1;) to see if you get different locks taken with the wider index.






            share|improve this answer





















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "182"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f226174%2fserializable-range-deadlocks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3















              We frequently experience deadlocks around an INSERT statement on the following table
              ...
              the stored procedure where the deadlocks occur [uses] SERIALIZABLE




              Yes. That is the expected behavior of the SERIALIZABLE isolation level. It's not widely understood, but deadlocks are how SERIALIZABLE enforces the isolation level. It doesn't prevent concurrent sessions from attempting to write conflicting changes; if two sessions read data and then both attempt conflicting changes, a deadlock occurs, and only one write succeeds.



              So if you don't want to deal with deadlocks, you're using the wrong concurrency model.



              If you simply want to prevent concurrent execution of this transaction, forcing sessions to execute it one-at-a-time, the simplest way is to use an application lock:



              BEGIN TRANSACTION
              exec sp_getapplock @Resource = 'MyTransaction', @LockMode = 'Exclusive';
              . . .





              share|improve this answer




























                3















                We frequently experience deadlocks around an INSERT statement on the following table
                ...
                the stored procedure where the deadlocks occur [uses] SERIALIZABLE




                Yes. That is the expected behavior of the SERIALIZABLE isolation level. It's not widely understood, but deadlocks are how SERIALIZABLE enforces the isolation level. It doesn't prevent concurrent sessions from attempting to write conflicting changes; if two sessions read data and then both attempt conflicting changes, a deadlock occurs, and only one write succeeds.



                So if you don't want to deal with deadlocks, you're using the wrong concurrency model.



                If you simply want to prevent concurrent execution of this transaction, forcing sessions to execute it one-at-a-time, the simplest way is to use an application lock:



                BEGIN TRANSACTION
                exec sp_getapplock @Resource = 'MyTransaction', @LockMode = 'Exclusive';
                . . .





                share|improve this answer


























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  We frequently experience deadlocks around an INSERT statement on the following table
                  ...
                  the stored procedure where the deadlocks occur [uses] SERIALIZABLE




                  Yes. That is the expected behavior of the SERIALIZABLE isolation level. It's not widely understood, but deadlocks are how SERIALIZABLE enforces the isolation level. It doesn't prevent concurrent sessions from attempting to write conflicting changes; if two sessions read data and then both attempt conflicting changes, a deadlock occurs, and only one write succeeds.



                  So if you don't want to deal with deadlocks, you're using the wrong concurrency model.



                  If you simply want to prevent concurrent execution of this transaction, forcing sessions to execute it one-at-a-time, the simplest way is to use an application lock:



                  BEGIN TRANSACTION
                  exec sp_getapplock @Resource = 'MyTransaction', @LockMode = 'Exclusive';
                  . . .





                  share|improve this answer















                  We frequently experience deadlocks around an INSERT statement on the following table
                  ...
                  the stored procedure where the deadlocks occur [uses] SERIALIZABLE




                  Yes. That is the expected behavior of the SERIALIZABLE isolation level. It's not widely understood, but deadlocks are how SERIALIZABLE enforces the isolation level. It doesn't prevent concurrent sessions from attempting to write conflicting changes; if two sessions read data and then both attempt conflicting changes, a deadlock occurs, and only one write succeeds.



                  So if you don't want to deal with deadlocks, you're using the wrong concurrency model.



                  If you simply want to prevent concurrent execution of this transaction, forcing sessions to execute it one-at-a-time, the simplest way is to use an application lock:



                  BEGIN TRANSACTION
                  exec sp_getapplock @Resource = 'MyTransaction', @LockMode = 'Exclusive';
                  . . .






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 2 at 17:53

























                  answered Jan 2 at 16:58









                  David Browne - Microsoft

                  10.5k726




                  10.5k726

























                      1














                      You have two queries on the deadlock-affected table that have very similar WHERE clauses. This one:



                      SELECT MAX(CreatedOn) 
                      FROM dbo.ID_Stub IDS
                      WHERE IDS.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
                      AND IDS.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
                      AND IDS.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID


                      And this one:



                      DELETE dbo.ID_Stub
                      WHERE IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
                      AND CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
                      AND AdditionalID = @AdditionalID;


                      Depending on the data in dbo.ID_Stub, you may be able to reduce the amount of range-locking going on (which is there due to the SERIALIZABLE isolation level, as you mentioned) by adding those other two fields to your nonclustered index key.



                      CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_IDReference 
                      ON dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, CreatedBy, AdditionalID)
                      WITH
                      (
                      ...all your other options
                      );


                      If you can't address the underlying problem of having to use the SERIALIZABLE isolation level (David Browne has makes a great suggestion with the getapplock procedure), then this could mitigate the problem at least.



                      You can do before and after testing with those specific queries on their own, checking the locks taken with sp_WhoIsActive @get_locks = 1;) to see if you get different locks taken with the wider index.






                      share|improve this answer


























                        1














                        You have two queries on the deadlock-affected table that have very similar WHERE clauses. This one:



                        SELECT MAX(CreatedOn) 
                        FROM dbo.ID_Stub IDS
                        WHERE IDS.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
                        AND IDS.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
                        AND IDS.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID


                        And this one:



                        DELETE dbo.ID_Stub
                        WHERE IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
                        AND CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
                        AND AdditionalID = @AdditionalID;


                        Depending on the data in dbo.ID_Stub, you may be able to reduce the amount of range-locking going on (which is there due to the SERIALIZABLE isolation level, as you mentioned) by adding those other two fields to your nonclustered index key.



                        CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_IDReference 
                        ON dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, CreatedBy, AdditionalID)
                        WITH
                        (
                        ...all your other options
                        );


                        If you can't address the underlying problem of having to use the SERIALIZABLE isolation level (David Browne has makes a great suggestion with the getapplock procedure), then this could mitigate the problem at least.



                        You can do before and after testing with those specific queries on their own, checking the locks taken with sp_WhoIsActive @get_locks = 1;) to see if you get different locks taken with the wider index.






                        share|improve this answer
























                          1












                          1








                          1






                          You have two queries on the deadlock-affected table that have very similar WHERE clauses. This one:



                          SELECT MAX(CreatedOn) 
                          FROM dbo.ID_Stub IDS
                          WHERE IDS.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
                          AND IDS.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
                          AND IDS.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID


                          And this one:



                          DELETE dbo.ID_Stub
                          WHERE IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
                          AND CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
                          AND AdditionalID = @AdditionalID;


                          Depending on the data in dbo.ID_Stub, you may be able to reduce the amount of range-locking going on (which is there due to the SERIALIZABLE isolation level, as you mentioned) by adding those other two fields to your nonclustered index key.



                          CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_IDReference 
                          ON dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, CreatedBy, AdditionalID)
                          WITH
                          (
                          ...all your other options
                          );


                          If you can't address the underlying problem of having to use the SERIALIZABLE isolation level (David Browne has makes a great suggestion with the getapplock procedure), then this could mitigate the problem at least.



                          You can do before and after testing with those specific queries on their own, checking the locks taken with sp_WhoIsActive @get_locks = 1;) to see if you get different locks taken with the wider index.






                          share|improve this answer












                          You have two queries on the deadlock-affected table that have very similar WHERE clauses. This one:



                          SELECT MAX(CreatedOn) 
                          FROM dbo.ID_Stub IDS
                          WHERE IDS.IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
                          AND IDS.CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
                          AND IDS.AdditionalID = @AdditionalID


                          And this one:



                          DELETE dbo.ID_Stub
                          WHERE IDReference = LTRIM(RTRIM(@IDReference))
                          AND CreatedBy = @CreatedBy
                          AND AdditionalID = @AdditionalID;


                          Depending on the data in dbo.ID_Stub, you may be able to reduce the amount of range-locking going on (which is there due to the SERIALIZABLE isolation level, as you mentioned) by adding those other two fields to your nonclustered index key.



                          CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_IDReference 
                          ON dbo.ID_Stub (IDReference, CreatedBy, AdditionalID)
                          WITH
                          (
                          ...all your other options
                          );


                          If you can't address the underlying problem of having to use the SERIALIZABLE isolation level (David Browne has makes a great suggestion with the getapplock procedure), then this could mitigate the problem at least.



                          You can do before and after testing with those specific queries on their own, checking the locks taken with sp_WhoIsActive @get_locks = 1;) to see if you get different locks taken with the wider index.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 2 at 17:43









                          jadarnel27

                          3,6901330




                          3,6901330






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f226174%2fserializable-range-deadlocks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                              Alcedinidae

                              Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]