Can arangodb handle 20 billion records?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I just want to know, can Arangodb handle 20 billions of records in a single collection?



What is the best way to insert 1 billion records at a time?










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I just want to know, can Arangodb handle 20 billions of records in a single collection?



    What is the best way to insert 1 billion records at a time?










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I just want to know, can Arangodb handle 20 billions of records in a single collection?



      What is the best way to insert 1 billion records at a time?










      share|improve this question













      I just want to know, can Arangodb handle 20 billions of records in a single collection?



      What is the best way to insert 1 billion records at a time?







      arangodb arangodb-php






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 12:20









      Yash Pandya

      61




      61
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Of course. The underlying storage engine choice should definitely be RocksDB. How big would every individual document in average be?



          The best way would be any sort of import/restore. Is this going to be a cluster or a single server deployment?






          share|improve this answer





















          • The individual document can be of size 1 kb. Currently I am using it as a single server and mmfiles as a storage engine.
            – Yash Pandya
            Nov 20 at 13:40










          • MMFiles is not an option unless you are looking into buying 20 exabyte of RAM. Memory mapped files performance goes towards zero, when data size including indexes cannot be matched in RAM size.
            – Kaveh Vahedipour
            Nov 20 at 17:45












          • Thanks for the reply. You suggested the best way to insert records is import/restore, but to use that my whole data should be ready before insertion,right? Suppose my data is generated at run time using some sort of script, at that time what should I use?
            – Yash Pandya
            Nov 22 at 14:40










          • Absolutely. By all means insert all you data.
            – Kaveh Vahedipour
            Nov 22 at 14:48











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53374517%2fcan-arangodb-handle-20-billion-records%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Of course. The underlying storage engine choice should definitely be RocksDB. How big would every individual document in average be?



          The best way would be any sort of import/restore. Is this going to be a cluster or a single server deployment?






          share|improve this answer





















          • The individual document can be of size 1 kb. Currently I am using it as a single server and mmfiles as a storage engine.
            – Yash Pandya
            Nov 20 at 13:40










          • MMFiles is not an option unless you are looking into buying 20 exabyte of RAM. Memory mapped files performance goes towards zero, when data size including indexes cannot be matched in RAM size.
            – Kaveh Vahedipour
            Nov 20 at 17:45












          • Thanks for the reply. You suggested the best way to insert records is import/restore, but to use that my whole data should be ready before insertion,right? Suppose my data is generated at run time using some sort of script, at that time what should I use?
            – Yash Pandya
            Nov 22 at 14:40










          • Absolutely. By all means insert all you data.
            – Kaveh Vahedipour
            Nov 22 at 14:48















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Of course. The underlying storage engine choice should definitely be RocksDB. How big would every individual document in average be?



          The best way would be any sort of import/restore. Is this going to be a cluster or a single server deployment?






          share|improve this answer





















          • The individual document can be of size 1 kb. Currently I am using it as a single server and mmfiles as a storage engine.
            – Yash Pandya
            Nov 20 at 13:40










          • MMFiles is not an option unless you are looking into buying 20 exabyte of RAM. Memory mapped files performance goes towards zero, when data size including indexes cannot be matched in RAM size.
            – Kaveh Vahedipour
            Nov 20 at 17:45












          • Thanks for the reply. You suggested the best way to insert records is import/restore, but to use that my whole data should be ready before insertion,right? Suppose my data is generated at run time using some sort of script, at that time what should I use?
            – Yash Pandya
            Nov 22 at 14:40










          • Absolutely. By all means insert all you data.
            – Kaveh Vahedipour
            Nov 22 at 14:48













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Of course. The underlying storage engine choice should definitely be RocksDB. How big would every individual document in average be?



          The best way would be any sort of import/restore. Is this going to be a cluster or a single server deployment?






          share|improve this answer












          Of course. The underlying storage engine choice should definitely be RocksDB. How big would every individual document in average be?



          The best way would be any sort of import/restore. Is this going to be a cluster or a single server deployment?







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 at 13:14









          Kaveh Vahedipour

          2,1601416




          2,1601416












          • The individual document can be of size 1 kb. Currently I am using it as a single server and mmfiles as a storage engine.
            – Yash Pandya
            Nov 20 at 13:40










          • MMFiles is not an option unless you are looking into buying 20 exabyte of RAM. Memory mapped files performance goes towards zero, when data size including indexes cannot be matched in RAM size.
            – Kaveh Vahedipour
            Nov 20 at 17:45












          • Thanks for the reply. You suggested the best way to insert records is import/restore, but to use that my whole data should be ready before insertion,right? Suppose my data is generated at run time using some sort of script, at that time what should I use?
            – Yash Pandya
            Nov 22 at 14:40










          • Absolutely. By all means insert all you data.
            – Kaveh Vahedipour
            Nov 22 at 14:48


















          • The individual document can be of size 1 kb. Currently I am using it as a single server and mmfiles as a storage engine.
            – Yash Pandya
            Nov 20 at 13:40










          • MMFiles is not an option unless you are looking into buying 20 exabyte of RAM. Memory mapped files performance goes towards zero, when data size including indexes cannot be matched in RAM size.
            – Kaveh Vahedipour
            Nov 20 at 17:45












          • Thanks for the reply. You suggested the best way to insert records is import/restore, but to use that my whole data should be ready before insertion,right? Suppose my data is generated at run time using some sort of script, at that time what should I use?
            – Yash Pandya
            Nov 22 at 14:40










          • Absolutely. By all means insert all you data.
            – Kaveh Vahedipour
            Nov 22 at 14:48
















          The individual document can be of size 1 kb. Currently I am using it as a single server and mmfiles as a storage engine.
          – Yash Pandya
          Nov 20 at 13:40




          The individual document can be of size 1 kb. Currently I am using it as a single server and mmfiles as a storage engine.
          – Yash Pandya
          Nov 20 at 13:40












          MMFiles is not an option unless you are looking into buying 20 exabyte of RAM. Memory mapped files performance goes towards zero, when data size including indexes cannot be matched in RAM size.
          – Kaveh Vahedipour
          Nov 20 at 17:45






          MMFiles is not an option unless you are looking into buying 20 exabyte of RAM. Memory mapped files performance goes towards zero, when data size including indexes cannot be matched in RAM size.
          – Kaveh Vahedipour
          Nov 20 at 17:45














          Thanks for the reply. You suggested the best way to insert records is import/restore, but to use that my whole data should be ready before insertion,right? Suppose my data is generated at run time using some sort of script, at that time what should I use?
          – Yash Pandya
          Nov 22 at 14:40




          Thanks for the reply. You suggested the best way to insert records is import/restore, but to use that my whole data should be ready before insertion,right? Suppose my data is generated at run time using some sort of script, at that time what should I use?
          – Yash Pandya
          Nov 22 at 14:40












          Absolutely. By all means insert all you data.
          – Kaveh Vahedipour
          Nov 22 at 14:48




          Absolutely. By all means insert all you data.
          – Kaveh Vahedipour
          Nov 22 at 14:48


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53374517%2fcan-arangodb-handle-20-billion-records%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

          Alcedinidae

          Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?