Correct way to fail a unit test from within a callback using Vertx Unit
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Given the following unit test, which uses the Vertx Unit testing framework:
@RunWith(VertxUnitRunner.class)
public class VertxUnitTest {
private Vertx vertx;
@Rule
public RunTestOnContext rule = new RunTestOnContext(new VertxOptions().setClustered(false)
.setClusterManager(new HazelcastClusterManager()).setMaxEventLoopExecuteTime(2000000000000L)
.setMaxWorkerExecuteTime(60000000000000L).setBlockedThreadCheckInterval(1000000)
.setEventBusOptions(new EventBusOptions().setClustered(false).setIdleTimeout(0)));
@Before
public void setup() throws Exception {
io.vertx.core.Vertx v = rule.vertx();
vertx = Vertx.newInstance(v);
}
private class MyVerticle extends AbstractVerticle {}
@Test
public void runFlow_correctMessage_stepsCalledInCorrectOrder(TestContext context) {
Async async = context.async();
vertx.getDelegate().deployVerticle(new MyVerticle(), new DeploymentOptions().setWorker(true), c -> {
c.cause();
vertx.eventBus().<Object>send("", new JsonObject(), new DeliveryOptions(), rpl -> {
async.complete();
fail();
});
});
}
}
the call to fail()
is throwing an exception to the console, but it is not actually failing the test itself, which finishes successfully and is green.
The same is true when working with Mockito. I can successfully verify the behavior of the verticle and its dependencies using mocks, but even when the Mockito assertions fail, the test itself will still pass. Calling fail on the vertx TestContext object - context.fail()
- will also not fail the test.
The core issue is this: any call to fail()
after async.complete()
will not fail the test, only the console will show the error. But without the call to async.complete()
, the code in the verticle (called upon consuming from the event bus), will not have run before the test assertions are called.
Without the call to async.complete()
, the test will it appears never complete.
What is the correct approach to this?
Thanks
asynchronous junit junit4 vert.x vertx-verticle
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Given the following unit test, which uses the Vertx Unit testing framework:
@RunWith(VertxUnitRunner.class)
public class VertxUnitTest {
private Vertx vertx;
@Rule
public RunTestOnContext rule = new RunTestOnContext(new VertxOptions().setClustered(false)
.setClusterManager(new HazelcastClusterManager()).setMaxEventLoopExecuteTime(2000000000000L)
.setMaxWorkerExecuteTime(60000000000000L).setBlockedThreadCheckInterval(1000000)
.setEventBusOptions(new EventBusOptions().setClustered(false).setIdleTimeout(0)));
@Before
public void setup() throws Exception {
io.vertx.core.Vertx v = rule.vertx();
vertx = Vertx.newInstance(v);
}
private class MyVerticle extends AbstractVerticle {}
@Test
public void runFlow_correctMessage_stepsCalledInCorrectOrder(TestContext context) {
Async async = context.async();
vertx.getDelegate().deployVerticle(new MyVerticle(), new DeploymentOptions().setWorker(true), c -> {
c.cause();
vertx.eventBus().<Object>send("", new JsonObject(), new DeliveryOptions(), rpl -> {
async.complete();
fail();
});
});
}
}
the call to fail()
is throwing an exception to the console, but it is not actually failing the test itself, which finishes successfully and is green.
The same is true when working with Mockito. I can successfully verify the behavior of the verticle and its dependencies using mocks, but even when the Mockito assertions fail, the test itself will still pass. Calling fail on the vertx TestContext object - context.fail()
- will also not fail the test.
The core issue is this: any call to fail()
after async.complete()
will not fail the test, only the console will show the error. But without the call to async.complete()
, the code in the verticle (called upon consuming from the event bus), will not have run before the test assertions are called.
Without the call to async.complete()
, the test will it appears never complete.
What is the correct approach to this?
Thanks
asynchronous junit junit4 vert.x vertx-verticle
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Given the following unit test, which uses the Vertx Unit testing framework:
@RunWith(VertxUnitRunner.class)
public class VertxUnitTest {
private Vertx vertx;
@Rule
public RunTestOnContext rule = new RunTestOnContext(new VertxOptions().setClustered(false)
.setClusterManager(new HazelcastClusterManager()).setMaxEventLoopExecuteTime(2000000000000L)
.setMaxWorkerExecuteTime(60000000000000L).setBlockedThreadCheckInterval(1000000)
.setEventBusOptions(new EventBusOptions().setClustered(false).setIdleTimeout(0)));
@Before
public void setup() throws Exception {
io.vertx.core.Vertx v = rule.vertx();
vertx = Vertx.newInstance(v);
}
private class MyVerticle extends AbstractVerticle {}
@Test
public void runFlow_correctMessage_stepsCalledInCorrectOrder(TestContext context) {
Async async = context.async();
vertx.getDelegate().deployVerticle(new MyVerticle(), new DeploymentOptions().setWorker(true), c -> {
c.cause();
vertx.eventBus().<Object>send("", new JsonObject(), new DeliveryOptions(), rpl -> {
async.complete();
fail();
});
});
}
}
the call to fail()
is throwing an exception to the console, but it is not actually failing the test itself, which finishes successfully and is green.
The same is true when working with Mockito. I can successfully verify the behavior of the verticle and its dependencies using mocks, but even when the Mockito assertions fail, the test itself will still pass. Calling fail on the vertx TestContext object - context.fail()
- will also not fail the test.
The core issue is this: any call to fail()
after async.complete()
will not fail the test, only the console will show the error. But without the call to async.complete()
, the code in the verticle (called upon consuming from the event bus), will not have run before the test assertions are called.
Without the call to async.complete()
, the test will it appears never complete.
What is the correct approach to this?
Thanks
asynchronous junit junit4 vert.x vertx-verticle
Given the following unit test, which uses the Vertx Unit testing framework:
@RunWith(VertxUnitRunner.class)
public class VertxUnitTest {
private Vertx vertx;
@Rule
public RunTestOnContext rule = new RunTestOnContext(new VertxOptions().setClustered(false)
.setClusterManager(new HazelcastClusterManager()).setMaxEventLoopExecuteTime(2000000000000L)
.setMaxWorkerExecuteTime(60000000000000L).setBlockedThreadCheckInterval(1000000)
.setEventBusOptions(new EventBusOptions().setClustered(false).setIdleTimeout(0)));
@Before
public void setup() throws Exception {
io.vertx.core.Vertx v = rule.vertx();
vertx = Vertx.newInstance(v);
}
private class MyVerticle extends AbstractVerticle {}
@Test
public void runFlow_correctMessage_stepsCalledInCorrectOrder(TestContext context) {
Async async = context.async();
vertx.getDelegate().deployVerticle(new MyVerticle(), new DeploymentOptions().setWorker(true), c -> {
c.cause();
vertx.eventBus().<Object>send("", new JsonObject(), new DeliveryOptions(), rpl -> {
async.complete();
fail();
});
});
}
}
the call to fail()
is throwing an exception to the console, but it is not actually failing the test itself, which finishes successfully and is green.
The same is true when working with Mockito. I can successfully verify the behavior of the verticle and its dependencies using mocks, but even when the Mockito assertions fail, the test itself will still pass. Calling fail on the vertx TestContext object - context.fail()
- will also not fail the test.
The core issue is this: any call to fail()
after async.complete()
will not fail the test, only the console will show the error. But without the call to async.complete()
, the code in the verticle (called upon consuming from the event bus), will not have run before the test assertions are called.
Without the call to async.complete()
, the test will it appears never complete.
What is the correct approach to this?
Thanks
asynchronous junit junit4 vert.x vertx-verticle
asynchronous junit junit4 vert.x vertx-verticle
edited Nov 20 at 8:18
asked Nov 19 at 16:57
user1052610
1,26042854
1,26042854
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
the correct approach is to call the TestContext.fail()
method, like so:
@Test
public void runFlow_correctMessage_stepsCalledInCorrectOrder(TestContext context) {
Async async = context.async();
vertx.getDelegate().deployVerticle(new MyVerticle(), new DeploymentOptions().setWorker(true), c -> {
if(c.succeeded()) {
vertx.eventBus().<Object>send("", new JsonObject(), new DeliveryOptions(), rpl -> {
if(rpl.succeeded()) {
// make assertions based on reply contents, and then...
async.complete();
} else {
context.fail(rpl.cause());
}
});
} else {
context.fail(c.cause());
}
});
}
Could you expand your answer to show where the code to sent a message on the event bus (and associated callback) should go. My tests are within the callback associated with sending to the event bus.The core issue is this: any call to fail() after async.complete() will not fail the test, only the console will show the error. But without the call to async.complete(), the code in the verticle (called upon consuming from the event bus), will not have run before the test assertions are called.
– user1052610
Nov 20 at 8:00
sorry i overlooked that part of your original post. i've updated my answer to reflect the nestedEventBus
handling
– homerman
Nov 20 at 18:32
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53379368%2fcorrect-way-to-fail-a-unit-test-from-within-a-callback-using-vertx-unit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
the correct approach is to call the TestContext.fail()
method, like so:
@Test
public void runFlow_correctMessage_stepsCalledInCorrectOrder(TestContext context) {
Async async = context.async();
vertx.getDelegate().deployVerticle(new MyVerticle(), new DeploymentOptions().setWorker(true), c -> {
if(c.succeeded()) {
vertx.eventBus().<Object>send("", new JsonObject(), new DeliveryOptions(), rpl -> {
if(rpl.succeeded()) {
// make assertions based on reply contents, and then...
async.complete();
} else {
context.fail(rpl.cause());
}
});
} else {
context.fail(c.cause());
}
});
}
Could you expand your answer to show where the code to sent a message on the event bus (and associated callback) should go. My tests are within the callback associated with sending to the event bus.The core issue is this: any call to fail() after async.complete() will not fail the test, only the console will show the error. But without the call to async.complete(), the code in the verticle (called upon consuming from the event bus), will not have run before the test assertions are called.
– user1052610
Nov 20 at 8:00
sorry i overlooked that part of your original post. i've updated my answer to reflect the nestedEventBus
handling
– homerman
Nov 20 at 18:32
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
the correct approach is to call the TestContext.fail()
method, like so:
@Test
public void runFlow_correctMessage_stepsCalledInCorrectOrder(TestContext context) {
Async async = context.async();
vertx.getDelegate().deployVerticle(new MyVerticle(), new DeploymentOptions().setWorker(true), c -> {
if(c.succeeded()) {
vertx.eventBus().<Object>send("", new JsonObject(), new DeliveryOptions(), rpl -> {
if(rpl.succeeded()) {
// make assertions based on reply contents, and then...
async.complete();
} else {
context.fail(rpl.cause());
}
});
} else {
context.fail(c.cause());
}
});
}
Could you expand your answer to show where the code to sent a message on the event bus (and associated callback) should go. My tests are within the callback associated with sending to the event bus.The core issue is this: any call to fail() after async.complete() will not fail the test, only the console will show the error. But without the call to async.complete(), the code in the verticle (called upon consuming from the event bus), will not have run before the test assertions are called.
– user1052610
Nov 20 at 8:00
sorry i overlooked that part of your original post. i've updated my answer to reflect the nestedEventBus
handling
– homerman
Nov 20 at 18:32
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
the correct approach is to call the TestContext.fail()
method, like so:
@Test
public void runFlow_correctMessage_stepsCalledInCorrectOrder(TestContext context) {
Async async = context.async();
vertx.getDelegate().deployVerticle(new MyVerticle(), new DeploymentOptions().setWorker(true), c -> {
if(c.succeeded()) {
vertx.eventBus().<Object>send("", new JsonObject(), new DeliveryOptions(), rpl -> {
if(rpl.succeeded()) {
// make assertions based on reply contents, and then...
async.complete();
} else {
context.fail(rpl.cause());
}
});
} else {
context.fail(c.cause());
}
});
}
the correct approach is to call the TestContext.fail()
method, like so:
@Test
public void runFlow_correctMessage_stepsCalledInCorrectOrder(TestContext context) {
Async async = context.async();
vertx.getDelegate().deployVerticle(new MyVerticle(), new DeploymentOptions().setWorker(true), c -> {
if(c.succeeded()) {
vertx.eventBus().<Object>send("", new JsonObject(), new DeliveryOptions(), rpl -> {
if(rpl.succeeded()) {
// make assertions based on reply contents, and then...
async.complete();
} else {
context.fail(rpl.cause());
}
});
} else {
context.fail(c.cause());
}
});
}
edited Nov 20 at 18:31
answered Nov 20 at 1:53
homerman
2,0021819
2,0021819
Could you expand your answer to show where the code to sent a message on the event bus (and associated callback) should go. My tests are within the callback associated with sending to the event bus.The core issue is this: any call to fail() after async.complete() will not fail the test, only the console will show the error. But without the call to async.complete(), the code in the verticle (called upon consuming from the event bus), will not have run before the test assertions are called.
– user1052610
Nov 20 at 8:00
sorry i overlooked that part of your original post. i've updated my answer to reflect the nestedEventBus
handling
– homerman
Nov 20 at 18:32
add a comment |
Could you expand your answer to show where the code to sent a message on the event bus (and associated callback) should go. My tests are within the callback associated with sending to the event bus.The core issue is this: any call to fail() after async.complete() will not fail the test, only the console will show the error. But without the call to async.complete(), the code in the verticle (called upon consuming from the event bus), will not have run before the test assertions are called.
– user1052610
Nov 20 at 8:00
sorry i overlooked that part of your original post. i've updated my answer to reflect the nestedEventBus
handling
– homerman
Nov 20 at 18:32
Could you expand your answer to show where the code to sent a message on the event bus (and associated callback) should go. My tests are within the callback associated with sending to the event bus.The core issue is this: any call to fail() after async.complete() will not fail the test, only the console will show the error. But without the call to async.complete(), the code in the verticle (called upon consuming from the event bus), will not have run before the test assertions are called.
– user1052610
Nov 20 at 8:00
Could you expand your answer to show where the code to sent a message on the event bus (and associated callback) should go. My tests are within the callback associated with sending to the event bus.The core issue is this: any call to fail() after async.complete() will not fail the test, only the console will show the error. But without the call to async.complete(), the code in the verticle (called upon consuming from the event bus), will not have run before the test assertions are called.
– user1052610
Nov 20 at 8:00
sorry i overlooked that part of your original post. i've updated my answer to reflect the nested
EventBus
handling– homerman
Nov 20 at 18:32
sorry i overlooked that part of your original post. i've updated my answer to reflect the nested
EventBus
handling– homerman
Nov 20 at 18:32
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53379368%2fcorrect-way-to-fail-a-unit-test-from-within-a-callback-using-vertx-unit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown