How can I rename files to match their EXIF “created date”?












6














I have around 3000 jpeg photos all with names like "DSC_0596". The metadata has the date the photo was created, which would be much more useful.
Is there a way to extract the date from the metadata and add it to the photo name?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    6














    I have around 3000 jpeg photos all with names like "DSC_0596". The metadata has the date the photo was created, which would be much more useful.
    Is there a way to extract the date from the metadata and add it to the photo name?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      6












      6








      6


      2





      I have around 3000 jpeg photos all with names like "DSC_0596". The metadata has the date the photo was created, which would be much more useful.
      Is there a way to extract the date from the metadata and add it to the photo name?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I have around 3000 jpeg photos all with names like "DSC_0596". The metadata has the date the photo was created, which would be much more useful.
      Is there a way to extract the date from the metadata and add it to the photo name?







      metadata file-management filenames date






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      mattdm

      118k38348639




      118k38348639






      New contributor




      Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Dec 26 at 3:07









      Simon Meade

      413




      413




      New contributor




      Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9














          ExifTool is pretty much the Swiss army chainsaw for doing these kinds of things. It has a steep learning curve, but once you're over it, the kind of renaming you're after is a snap:



          exiftool -d '%Y%m%d-%H%M%%-03.c.%%e' '-filename<CreateDate' .


          The -d switch tells ExifTool to format dates according to the next argument's pattern. The pattern contains date format codes that fill in various bits and pieces from the date. This would rename a file taken today at 17:34 to 20181226-1734-000.nef. The three zeros after the time are a copy number put there by %%-03.c in the date format. I'll explain why that's important in a minute.



          The next argument tells ExifTool to change the filename to whatever is in the CreateDate field in the EXIF using the date format specified earlier.



          Finally, the . is the path of the directory where you want to operate. You can also specify individual images if you want.



          About the copy number: This is an important thing to put in your filenames because many cameras don't provide fractional seconds in their timestamps. If you had multiple files created during the same second, each successive rename would overwrite the last file and all you'd get is the last one. When picking a name, ExifTool will keep incrementing the copy number until it finds a filename that doesn't exist and rename the file to that. Note that this does not weed out duplicates. If you use this method to copy images from a card into some other directory and then run it again on the same set of images, you will end up with identical files numbered 000 and 001.






          share|improve this answer































            4














            For simple things where the flexibility, power, and complication of ExifTool aren't necessary, I like to use the tool jhead. It's a command-line tool available for Linux, Mac, and Windows.



            jhead -n%Y%m%d-%H%M%S *.jpg


            will automatically rename all files ending in .jpg in the current directory to a format like 20181226-111141.jpg. You can use %f to also include the original filename (without extension). So, for example:



            jhead -n%Y%m%d-%f *.jpg


            ... which gives the date (and not the time) and the original filename, like 20181226-DSC_0596.jpg.



            Note that there is logic to attempt to not rename files which already are mostly digits, which keeps the command from accidentally acting twice. Use -nf instead of just -n to override this. There is also logic to automatically add an incrementing trailing digit if the target filename already exists.



            Also, I usually add -autorot and -ft to the command line, to match image orientation to the camera's rotation sensor and to make the file time match the exif time.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 1




              The problem with jhead is it requires libjpeg-turbo-progs, so it will conflict with packages that require libjpeg-progs.
              – xiota
              2 days ago










            • @xiota That sounds like a distro-specific packaging problem. If I recall correctly, in Fedora we just replaced libjpeg across the board.
              – mattdm
              2 days ago












            • I upvoted your answer b/c it's a good solution if it works. Just wanted to note that there might be issues installing it.
              – xiota
              2 days ago










            • @xiota What operating system is this a problem on?
              – mattdm
              yesterday



















            1














            I use the following script, placed in ~/.local/share/nautilus/scripts (this should work for any Linux distro using Nautilus as a file manager):



            #!/bin/bash

            exiftool -fileOrder DateTimeOriginal -recurse -extension jpg -ignoreMinorErrors '-FileName<CreateDate' -d %Y-%m-%d%%-.3nc.%%e "$@"


            Doing it this way means I can select one or more files/directories and recursively rename all JPEG images in them from my mouse's right-click menu, which is pretty handy. It also ignores any files that are not JPEGs so I do not need to worry about what is in subdirectories.



            Selected files are renamed in the following pattern YYYYMMDD-001.jpg. Numbering begins at 001 and continues to 999, so if you shoot 1000 or more images in one day you must modify the script (change 3nc to 4nc, the numeric value = how many digits to use).



            Using the -fileOrder DateTimeOriginal argument makes sure that images are processed in order, and numbering strictly follows that order, otherwise shots takes in quick succession are not guaranteed to be renumbered in exact order they were taken.






            share|improve this answer





























              1














              Thanks all but I ended up using AmoK EXIF Sorter, a free app that does it all simply, quickly and effectively.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.


















              • Hi Simon, welcome to Photo.SE. I'm glad you found a solution that works for you. If you don't mind, please mark your answer as the accepted answer (it's perfectly OK to ask and answer your own question). Thanks, and happy shooting! =)
                – scottbb
                yesterday











              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "61"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });






              Simon Meade is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103767%2fhow-can-i-rename-files-to-match-their-exif-created-date%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              9














              ExifTool is pretty much the Swiss army chainsaw for doing these kinds of things. It has a steep learning curve, but once you're over it, the kind of renaming you're after is a snap:



              exiftool -d '%Y%m%d-%H%M%%-03.c.%%e' '-filename<CreateDate' .


              The -d switch tells ExifTool to format dates according to the next argument's pattern. The pattern contains date format codes that fill in various bits and pieces from the date. This would rename a file taken today at 17:34 to 20181226-1734-000.nef. The three zeros after the time are a copy number put there by %%-03.c in the date format. I'll explain why that's important in a minute.



              The next argument tells ExifTool to change the filename to whatever is in the CreateDate field in the EXIF using the date format specified earlier.



              Finally, the . is the path of the directory where you want to operate. You can also specify individual images if you want.



              About the copy number: This is an important thing to put in your filenames because many cameras don't provide fractional seconds in their timestamps. If you had multiple files created during the same second, each successive rename would overwrite the last file and all you'd get is the last one. When picking a name, ExifTool will keep incrementing the copy number until it finds a filename that doesn't exist and rename the file to that. Note that this does not weed out duplicates. If you use this method to copy images from a card into some other directory and then run it again on the same set of images, you will end up with identical files numbered 000 and 001.






              share|improve this answer




























                9














                ExifTool is pretty much the Swiss army chainsaw for doing these kinds of things. It has a steep learning curve, but once you're over it, the kind of renaming you're after is a snap:



                exiftool -d '%Y%m%d-%H%M%%-03.c.%%e' '-filename<CreateDate' .


                The -d switch tells ExifTool to format dates according to the next argument's pattern. The pattern contains date format codes that fill in various bits and pieces from the date. This would rename a file taken today at 17:34 to 20181226-1734-000.nef. The three zeros after the time are a copy number put there by %%-03.c in the date format. I'll explain why that's important in a minute.



                The next argument tells ExifTool to change the filename to whatever is in the CreateDate field in the EXIF using the date format specified earlier.



                Finally, the . is the path of the directory where you want to operate. You can also specify individual images if you want.



                About the copy number: This is an important thing to put in your filenames because many cameras don't provide fractional seconds in their timestamps. If you had multiple files created during the same second, each successive rename would overwrite the last file and all you'd get is the last one. When picking a name, ExifTool will keep incrementing the copy number until it finds a filename that doesn't exist and rename the file to that. Note that this does not weed out duplicates. If you use this method to copy images from a card into some other directory and then run it again on the same set of images, you will end up with identical files numbered 000 and 001.






                share|improve this answer


























                  9












                  9








                  9






                  ExifTool is pretty much the Swiss army chainsaw for doing these kinds of things. It has a steep learning curve, but once you're over it, the kind of renaming you're after is a snap:



                  exiftool -d '%Y%m%d-%H%M%%-03.c.%%e' '-filename<CreateDate' .


                  The -d switch tells ExifTool to format dates according to the next argument's pattern. The pattern contains date format codes that fill in various bits and pieces from the date. This would rename a file taken today at 17:34 to 20181226-1734-000.nef. The three zeros after the time are a copy number put there by %%-03.c in the date format. I'll explain why that's important in a minute.



                  The next argument tells ExifTool to change the filename to whatever is in the CreateDate field in the EXIF using the date format specified earlier.



                  Finally, the . is the path of the directory where you want to operate. You can also specify individual images if you want.



                  About the copy number: This is an important thing to put in your filenames because many cameras don't provide fractional seconds in their timestamps. If you had multiple files created during the same second, each successive rename would overwrite the last file and all you'd get is the last one. When picking a name, ExifTool will keep incrementing the copy number until it finds a filename that doesn't exist and rename the file to that. Note that this does not weed out duplicates. If you use this method to copy images from a card into some other directory and then run it again on the same set of images, you will end up with identical files numbered 000 and 001.






                  share|improve this answer














                  ExifTool is pretty much the Swiss army chainsaw for doing these kinds of things. It has a steep learning curve, but once you're over it, the kind of renaming you're after is a snap:



                  exiftool -d '%Y%m%d-%H%M%%-03.c.%%e' '-filename<CreateDate' .


                  The -d switch tells ExifTool to format dates according to the next argument's pattern. The pattern contains date format codes that fill in various bits and pieces from the date. This would rename a file taken today at 17:34 to 20181226-1734-000.nef. The three zeros after the time are a copy number put there by %%-03.c in the date format. I'll explain why that's important in a minute.



                  The next argument tells ExifTool to change the filename to whatever is in the CreateDate field in the EXIF using the date format specified earlier.



                  Finally, the . is the path of the directory where you want to operate. You can also specify individual images if you want.



                  About the copy number: This is an important thing to put in your filenames because many cameras don't provide fractional seconds in their timestamps. If you had multiple files created during the same second, each successive rename would overwrite the last file and all you'd get is the last one. When picking a name, ExifTool will keep incrementing the copy number until it finds a filename that doesn't exist and rename the file to that. Note that this does not weed out duplicates. If you use this method to copy images from a card into some other directory and then run it again on the same set of images, you will end up with identical files numbered 000 and 001.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  Blrfl

                  4,7061322




                  4,7061322

























                      4














                      For simple things where the flexibility, power, and complication of ExifTool aren't necessary, I like to use the tool jhead. It's a command-line tool available for Linux, Mac, and Windows.



                      jhead -n%Y%m%d-%H%M%S *.jpg


                      will automatically rename all files ending in .jpg in the current directory to a format like 20181226-111141.jpg. You can use %f to also include the original filename (without extension). So, for example:



                      jhead -n%Y%m%d-%f *.jpg


                      ... which gives the date (and not the time) and the original filename, like 20181226-DSC_0596.jpg.



                      Note that there is logic to attempt to not rename files which already are mostly digits, which keeps the command from accidentally acting twice. Use -nf instead of just -n to override this. There is also logic to automatically add an incrementing trailing digit if the target filename already exists.



                      Also, I usually add -autorot and -ft to the command line, to match image orientation to the camera's rotation sensor and to make the file time match the exif time.






                      share|improve this answer

















                      • 1




                        The problem with jhead is it requires libjpeg-turbo-progs, so it will conflict with packages that require libjpeg-progs.
                        – xiota
                        2 days ago










                      • @xiota That sounds like a distro-specific packaging problem. If I recall correctly, in Fedora we just replaced libjpeg across the board.
                        – mattdm
                        2 days ago












                      • I upvoted your answer b/c it's a good solution if it works. Just wanted to note that there might be issues installing it.
                        – xiota
                        2 days ago










                      • @xiota What operating system is this a problem on?
                        – mattdm
                        yesterday
















                      4














                      For simple things where the flexibility, power, and complication of ExifTool aren't necessary, I like to use the tool jhead. It's a command-line tool available for Linux, Mac, and Windows.



                      jhead -n%Y%m%d-%H%M%S *.jpg


                      will automatically rename all files ending in .jpg in the current directory to a format like 20181226-111141.jpg. You can use %f to also include the original filename (without extension). So, for example:



                      jhead -n%Y%m%d-%f *.jpg


                      ... which gives the date (and not the time) and the original filename, like 20181226-DSC_0596.jpg.



                      Note that there is logic to attempt to not rename files which already are mostly digits, which keeps the command from accidentally acting twice. Use -nf instead of just -n to override this. There is also logic to automatically add an incrementing trailing digit if the target filename already exists.



                      Also, I usually add -autorot and -ft to the command line, to match image orientation to the camera's rotation sensor and to make the file time match the exif time.






                      share|improve this answer

















                      • 1




                        The problem with jhead is it requires libjpeg-turbo-progs, so it will conflict with packages that require libjpeg-progs.
                        – xiota
                        2 days ago










                      • @xiota That sounds like a distro-specific packaging problem. If I recall correctly, in Fedora we just replaced libjpeg across the board.
                        – mattdm
                        2 days ago












                      • I upvoted your answer b/c it's a good solution if it works. Just wanted to note that there might be issues installing it.
                        – xiota
                        2 days ago










                      • @xiota What operating system is this a problem on?
                        – mattdm
                        yesterday














                      4












                      4








                      4






                      For simple things where the flexibility, power, and complication of ExifTool aren't necessary, I like to use the tool jhead. It's a command-line tool available for Linux, Mac, and Windows.



                      jhead -n%Y%m%d-%H%M%S *.jpg


                      will automatically rename all files ending in .jpg in the current directory to a format like 20181226-111141.jpg. You can use %f to also include the original filename (without extension). So, for example:



                      jhead -n%Y%m%d-%f *.jpg


                      ... which gives the date (and not the time) and the original filename, like 20181226-DSC_0596.jpg.



                      Note that there is logic to attempt to not rename files which already are mostly digits, which keeps the command from accidentally acting twice. Use -nf instead of just -n to override this. There is also logic to automatically add an incrementing trailing digit if the target filename already exists.



                      Also, I usually add -autorot and -ft to the command line, to match image orientation to the camera's rotation sensor and to make the file time match the exif time.






                      share|improve this answer












                      For simple things where the flexibility, power, and complication of ExifTool aren't necessary, I like to use the tool jhead. It's a command-line tool available for Linux, Mac, and Windows.



                      jhead -n%Y%m%d-%H%M%S *.jpg


                      will automatically rename all files ending in .jpg in the current directory to a format like 20181226-111141.jpg. You can use %f to also include the original filename (without extension). So, for example:



                      jhead -n%Y%m%d-%f *.jpg


                      ... which gives the date (and not the time) and the original filename, like 20181226-DSC_0596.jpg.



                      Note that there is logic to attempt to not rename files which already are mostly digits, which keeps the command from accidentally acting twice. Use -nf instead of just -n to override this. There is also logic to automatically add an incrementing trailing digit if the target filename already exists.



                      Also, I usually add -autorot and -ft to the command line, to match image orientation to the camera's rotation sensor and to make the file time match the exif time.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 2 days ago









                      mattdm

                      118k38348639




                      118k38348639








                      • 1




                        The problem with jhead is it requires libjpeg-turbo-progs, so it will conflict with packages that require libjpeg-progs.
                        – xiota
                        2 days ago










                      • @xiota That sounds like a distro-specific packaging problem. If I recall correctly, in Fedora we just replaced libjpeg across the board.
                        – mattdm
                        2 days ago












                      • I upvoted your answer b/c it's a good solution if it works. Just wanted to note that there might be issues installing it.
                        – xiota
                        2 days ago










                      • @xiota What operating system is this a problem on?
                        – mattdm
                        yesterday














                      • 1




                        The problem with jhead is it requires libjpeg-turbo-progs, so it will conflict with packages that require libjpeg-progs.
                        – xiota
                        2 days ago










                      • @xiota That sounds like a distro-specific packaging problem. If I recall correctly, in Fedora we just replaced libjpeg across the board.
                        – mattdm
                        2 days ago












                      • I upvoted your answer b/c it's a good solution if it works. Just wanted to note that there might be issues installing it.
                        – xiota
                        2 days ago










                      • @xiota What operating system is this a problem on?
                        – mattdm
                        yesterday








                      1




                      1




                      The problem with jhead is it requires libjpeg-turbo-progs, so it will conflict with packages that require libjpeg-progs.
                      – xiota
                      2 days ago




                      The problem with jhead is it requires libjpeg-turbo-progs, so it will conflict with packages that require libjpeg-progs.
                      – xiota
                      2 days ago












                      @xiota That sounds like a distro-specific packaging problem. If I recall correctly, in Fedora we just replaced libjpeg across the board.
                      – mattdm
                      2 days ago






                      @xiota That sounds like a distro-specific packaging problem. If I recall correctly, in Fedora we just replaced libjpeg across the board.
                      – mattdm
                      2 days ago














                      I upvoted your answer b/c it's a good solution if it works. Just wanted to note that there might be issues installing it.
                      – xiota
                      2 days ago




                      I upvoted your answer b/c it's a good solution if it works. Just wanted to note that there might be issues installing it.
                      – xiota
                      2 days ago












                      @xiota What operating system is this a problem on?
                      – mattdm
                      yesterday




                      @xiota What operating system is this a problem on?
                      – mattdm
                      yesterday











                      1














                      I use the following script, placed in ~/.local/share/nautilus/scripts (this should work for any Linux distro using Nautilus as a file manager):



                      #!/bin/bash

                      exiftool -fileOrder DateTimeOriginal -recurse -extension jpg -ignoreMinorErrors '-FileName<CreateDate' -d %Y-%m-%d%%-.3nc.%%e "$@"


                      Doing it this way means I can select one or more files/directories and recursively rename all JPEG images in them from my mouse's right-click menu, which is pretty handy. It also ignores any files that are not JPEGs so I do not need to worry about what is in subdirectories.



                      Selected files are renamed in the following pattern YYYYMMDD-001.jpg. Numbering begins at 001 and continues to 999, so if you shoot 1000 or more images in one day you must modify the script (change 3nc to 4nc, the numeric value = how many digits to use).



                      Using the -fileOrder DateTimeOriginal argument makes sure that images are processed in order, and numbering strictly follows that order, otherwise shots takes in quick succession are not guaranteed to be renumbered in exact order they were taken.






                      share|improve this answer


























                        1














                        I use the following script, placed in ~/.local/share/nautilus/scripts (this should work for any Linux distro using Nautilus as a file manager):



                        #!/bin/bash

                        exiftool -fileOrder DateTimeOriginal -recurse -extension jpg -ignoreMinorErrors '-FileName<CreateDate' -d %Y-%m-%d%%-.3nc.%%e "$@"


                        Doing it this way means I can select one or more files/directories and recursively rename all JPEG images in them from my mouse's right-click menu, which is pretty handy. It also ignores any files that are not JPEGs so I do not need to worry about what is in subdirectories.



                        Selected files are renamed in the following pattern YYYYMMDD-001.jpg. Numbering begins at 001 and continues to 999, so if you shoot 1000 or more images in one day you must modify the script (change 3nc to 4nc, the numeric value = how many digits to use).



                        Using the -fileOrder DateTimeOriginal argument makes sure that images are processed in order, and numbering strictly follows that order, otherwise shots takes in quick succession are not guaranteed to be renumbered in exact order they were taken.






                        share|improve this answer
























                          1












                          1








                          1






                          I use the following script, placed in ~/.local/share/nautilus/scripts (this should work for any Linux distro using Nautilus as a file manager):



                          #!/bin/bash

                          exiftool -fileOrder DateTimeOriginal -recurse -extension jpg -ignoreMinorErrors '-FileName<CreateDate' -d %Y-%m-%d%%-.3nc.%%e "$@"


                          Doing it this way means I can select one or more files/directories and recursively rename all JPEG images in them from my mouse's right-click menu, which is pretty handy. It also ignores any files that are not JPEGs so I do not need to worry about what is in subdirectories.



                          Selected files are renamed in the following pattern YYYYMMDD-001.jpg. Numbering begins at 001 and continues to 999, so if you shoot 1000 or more images in one day you must modify the script (change 3nc to 4nc, the numeric value = how many digits to use).



                          Using the -fileOrder DateTimeOriginal argument makes sure that images are processed in order, and numbering strictly follows that order, otherwise shots takes in quick succession are not guaranteed to be renumbered in exact order they were taken.






                          share|improve this answer












                          I use the following script, placed in ~/.local/share/nautilus/scripts (this should work for any Linux distro using Nautilus as a file manager):



                          #!/bin/bash

                          exiftool -fileOrder DateTimeOriginal -recurse -extension jpg -ignoreMinorErrors '-FileName<CreateDate' -d %Y-%m-%d%%-.3nc.%%e "$@"


                          Doing it this way means I can select one or more files/directories and recursively rename all JPEG images in them from my mouse's right-click menu, which is pretty handy. It also ignores any files that are not JPEGs so I do not need to worry about what is in subdirectories.



                          Selected files are renamed in the following pattern YYYYMMDD-001.jpg. Numbering begins at 001 and continues to 999, so if you shoot 1000 or more images in one day you must modify the script (change 3nc to 4nc, the numeric value = how many digits to use).



                          Using the -fileOrder DateTimeOriginal argument makes sure that images are processed in order, and numbering strictly follows that order, otherwise shots takes in quick succession are not guaranteed to be renumbered in exact order they were taken.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered yesterday









                          Tom Brossman

                          692311




                          692311























                              1














                              Thanks all but I ended up using AmoK EXIF Sorter, a free app that does it all simply, quickly and effectively.






                              share|improve this answer










                              New contributor




                              Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                              • Hi Simon, welcome to Photo.SE. I'm glad you found a solution that works for you. If you don't mind, please mark your answer as the accepted answer (it's perfectly OK to ask and answer your own question). Thanks, and happy shooting! =)
                                – scottbb
                                yesterday
















                              1














                              Thanks all but I ended up using AmoK EXIF Sorter, a free app that does it all simply, quickly and effectively.






                              share|improve this answer










                              New contributor




                              Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                              • Hi Simon, welcome to Photo.SE. I'm glad you found a solution that works for you. If you don't mind, please mark your answer as the accepted answer (it's perfectly OK to ask and answer your own question). Thanks, and happy shooting! =)
                                – scottbb
                                yesterday














                              1












                              1








                              1






                              Thanks all but I ended up using AmoK EXIF Sorter, a free app that does it all simply, quickly and effectively.






                              share|improve this answer










                              New contributor




                              Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                              Thanks all but I ended up using AmoK EXIF Sorter, a free app that does it all simply, quickly and effectively.







                              share|improve this answer










                              New contributor




                              Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited yesterday









                              scottbb

                              19.3k75591




                              19.3k75591






                              New contributor




                              Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                              answered yesterday









                              Simon Meade

                              413




                              413




                              New contributor




                              Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.





                              New contributor





                              Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.






                              Simon Meade is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.












                              • Hi Simon, welcome to Photo.SE. I'm glad you found a solution that works for you. If you don't mind, please mark your answer as the accepted answer (it's perfectly OK to ask and answer your own question). Thanks, and happy shooting! =)
                                – scottbb
                                yesterday


















                              • Hi Simon, welcome to Photo.SE. I'm glad you found a solution that works for you. If you don't mind, please mark your answer as the accepted answer (it's perfectly OK to ask and answer your own question). Thanks, and happy shooting! =)
                                – scottbb
                                yesterday
















                              Hi Simon, welcome to Photo.SE. I'm glad you found a solution that works for you. If you don't mind, please mark your answer as the accepted answer (it's perfectly OK to ask and answer your own question). Thanks, and happy shooting! =)
                              – scottbb
                              yesterday




                              Hi Simon, welcome to Photo.SE. I'm glad you found a solution that works for you. If you don't mind, please mark your answer as the accepted answer (it's perfectly OK to ask and answer your own question). Thanks, and happy shooting! =)
                              – scottbb
                              yesterday










                              Simon Meade is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              Simon Meade is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                              Simon Meade is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              Simon Meade is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103767%2fhow-can-i-rename-files-to-match-their-exif-created-date%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                              Alcedinidae

                              Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?