How to fill in NAs of various columns grouped by duplicated IDs in R












0














I have a table with columns id, colA, and colB. The data contains duplicated id columns where for some rows, colA or colB is null, but its duplicated id has valid values. I want to clean the data so that I remove duplicates, but have complete data. For example my data looks like



id | colA | colB
1 NA X
1 Y X
2 Z NA
2 Z Y
3 Z Y
3 Z Y
4 NA NA
4 NA NA


and I want my dataframe to look like



id | colA | colB
1 Y X
2 Z Y
3 Z Y
4 NA NA


I usually use the ifelse statement to replace missing values, but I am confused on how to use this in the context of having duplicated ids.










share|improve this question






















  • In the case where only one value per id is NA, is it always the first row with that id, as in your example data?
    – neilfws
    Nov 20 at 0:40
















0














I have a table with columns id, colA, and colB. The data contains duplicated id columns where for some rows, colA or colB is null, but its duplicated id has valid values. I want to clean the data so that I remove duplicates, but have complete data. For example my data looks like



id | colA | colB
1 NA X
1 Y X
2 Z NA
2 Z Y
3 Z Y
3 Z Y
4 NA NA
4 NA NA


and I want my dataframe to look like



id | colA | colB
1 Y X
2 Z Y
3 Z Y
4 NA NA


I usually use the ifelse statement to replace missing values, but I am confused on how to use this in the context of having duplicated ids.










share|improve this question






















  • In the case where only one value per id is NA, is it always the first row with that id, as in your example data?
    – neilfws
    Nov 20 at 0:40














0












0








0







I have a table with columns id, colA, and colB. The data contains duplicated id columns where for some rows, colA or colB is null, but its duplicated id has valid values. I want to clean the data so that I remove duplicates, but have complete data. For example my data looks like



id | colA | colB
1 NA X
1 Y X
2 Z NA
2 Z Y
3 Z Y
3 Z Y
4 NA NA
4 NA NA


and I want my dataframe to look like



id | colA | colB
1 Y X
2 Z Y
3 Z Y
4 NA NA


I usually use the ifelse statement to replace missing values, but I am confused on how to use this in the context of having duplicated ids.










share|improve this question













I have a table with columns id, colA, and colB. The data contains duplicated id columns where for some rows, colA or colB is null, but its duplicated id has valid values. I want to clean the data so that I remove duplicates, but have complete data. For example my data looks like



id | colA | colB
1 NA X
1 Y X
2 Z NA
2 Z Y
3 Z Y
3 Z Y
4 NA NA
4 NA NA


and I want my dataframe to look like



id | colA | colB
1 Y X
2 Z Y
3 Z Y
4 NA NA


I usually use the ifelse statement to replace missing values, but I am confused on how to use this in the context of having duplicated ids.







r merge na






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 19 at 23:56









Kevin Sun

11818




11818












  • In the case where only one value per id is NA, is it always the first row with that id, as in your example data?
    – neilfws
    Nov 20 at 0:40


















  • In the case where only one value per id is NA, is it always the first row with that id, as in your example data?
    – neilfws
    Nov 20 at 0:40
















In the case where only one value per id is NA, is it always the first row with that id, as in your example data?
– neilfws
Nov 20 at 0:40




In the case where only one value per id is NA, is it always the first row with that id, as in your example data?
– neilfws
Nov 20 at 0:40












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














This answer is very dependent on your actual data being similar in structure to your example data.



Your data:



df1 <- structure(list(id = c(1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L), 
colA = c(NA, "Y", "Z", "Z", "Z", "Z", NA, NA),
colB = c("X", "X", NA, "Y", "Y", "Y", NA, NA)),
class = "data.frame",
row.names = c(NA, -8L))


Assuming, as in your example, that each id occurs twice and that where one observation is NA, it is the first observation for that id, then this works:



library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)

df1 %>%
group_by(id) %>%
fill(colA, colB, .direction = "up") %>%
ungroup() %>%
distinct()

# A tibble: 4 x 3
id colA colB
<int> <chr> <chr>
1 1 Y X
2 2 Z Y
3 3 Z Y
4 4 NA NA


If the second observation for an id can be NA, you could try adding a second fill after the first one, but this time fill down:



df1 %>% 
group_by(id) %>%
fill(colA, colB, .direction = "up") %>%
fill(colA, colB, .direction = "down") %>%
ungroup() %>%
distinct()





share|improve this answer





























    4














    First add a column that tells how many NAs in each row. Then using dplyr, remove duplicated rows first and then for each id keep the row with least missing values -



    df$test <- rowSums(is.na(df))

    df %>%
    filter(!duplicated(.)) %>%
    arrange(id, test) %>%
    group_by(id) %>%
    filter(row_number() == 1) %>%
    ungroup() %>%
    select(-test)

    # A tibble: 4 x 3
    id colA colB
    <int> <chr> <chr>
    1 1 y x
    2 2 z y
    3 3 z y
    4 4 <NA> <NA>


    EDIT:
    Actually no need to remove duplicates first. Just keeping the row with least missing values for each id should also work -



    df$test <- rowSums(is.na(df))

    df %>%
    arrange(id, test) %>%
    group_by(id) %>%
    filter(row_number() == 1) %>%
    ungroup() %>%
    select(-test)


    Data -



    df <- data.frame(
    id = c(rep(seq(1:4), each =2)), colA = c(NA, "y", "z", "z", "z", "z", NA, NA),
    colB = c("x", "x", NA, "y", "y", "y", NA, NA), stringsAsFactors = F)





    share|improve this answer































      1














      Creating dataframe - it helps if you post the code to make the sample data



      df <- data.frame(id = c(rep(seq(1:4), each =2)), colA = c(NA, "y", "z", "z", "z", "z", NA, NA), colB = c("x", "x", NA, "y", "y", "y", NA, NA))


      Removing rows with single NAs



      for(i in 1:nrow(df)){

      if(is.na(df[i,]$colA) & !is.na(df[i,]$colB) | !is.na(df[i,]$colA) & is.na(df[i,]$colB)){

      df <- df[-i,]

      }
      }


      Removing remaining duplicates (i.e. double NA rows)



      df  <- df[!duplicated(df), ]


      Output



      df


      Probably a more computationally efficient way of doing this but this ought to work.






      share|improve this answer





















        Your Answer






        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
        StackExchange.snippets.init();
        });
        });
        }, "code-snippets");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "1"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53384336%2fhow-to-fill-in-nas-of-various-columns-grouped-by-duplicated-ids-in-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2














        This answer is very dependent on your actual data being similar in structure to your example data.



        Your data:



        df1 <- structure(list(id = c(1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L), 
        colA = c(NA, "Y", "Z", "Z", "Z", "Z", NA, NA),
        colB = c("X", "X", NA, "Y", "Y", "Y", NA, NA)),
        class = "data.frame",
        row.names = c(NA, -8L))


        Assuming, as in your example, that each id occurs twice and that where one observation is NA, it is the first observation for that id, then this works:



        library(dplyr)
        library(tidyr)

        df1 %>%
        group_by(id) %>%
        fill(colA, colB, .direction = "up") %>%
        ungroup() %>%
        distinct()

        # A tibble: 4 x 3
        id colA colB
        <int> <chr> <chr>
        1 1 Y X
        2 2 Z Y
        3 3 Z Y
        4 4 NA NA


        If the second observation for an id can be NA, you could try adding a second fill after the first one, but this time fill down:



        df1 %>% 
        group_by(id) %>%
        fill(colA, colB, .direction = "up") %>%
        fill(colA, colB, .direction = "down") %>%
        ungroup() %>%
        distinct()





        share|improve this answer


























          2














          This answer is very dependent on your actual data being similar in structure to your example data.



          Your data:



          df1 <- structure(list(id = c(1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L), 
          colA = c(NA, "Y", "Z", "Z", "Z", "Z", NA, NA),
          colB = c("X", "X", NA, "Y", "Y", "Y", NA, NA)),
          class = "data.frame",
          row.names = c(NA, -8L))


          Assuming, as in your example, that each id occurs twice and that where one observation is NA, it is the first observation for that id, then this works:



          library(dplyr)
          library(tidyr)

          df1 %>%
          group_by(id) %>%
          fill(colA, colB, .direction = "up") %>%
          ungroup() %>%
          distinct()

          # A tibble: 4 x 3
          id colA colB
          <int> <chr> <chr>
          1 1 Y X
          2 2 Z Y
          3 3 Z Y
          4 4 NA NA


          If the second observation for an id can be NA, you could try adding a second fill after the first one, but this time fill down:



          df1 %>% 
          group_by(id) %>%
          fill(colA, colB, .direction = "up") %>%
          fill(colA, colB, .direction = "down") %>%
          ungroup() %>%
          distinct()





          share|improve this answer
























            2












            2








            2






            This answer is very dependent on your actual data being similar in structure to your example data.



            Your data:



            df1 <- structure(list(id = c(1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L), 
            colA = c(NA, "Y", "Z", "Z", "Z", "Z", NA, NA),
            colB = c("X", "X", NA, "Y", "Y", "Y", NA, NA)),
            class = "data.frame",
            row.names = c(NA, -8L))


            Assuming, as in your example, that each id occurs twice and that where one observation is NA, it is the first observation for that id, then this works:



            library(dplyr)
            library(tidyr)

            df1 %>%
            group_by(id) %>%
            fill(colA, colB, .direction = "up") %>%
            ungroup() %>%
            distinct()

            # A tibble: 4 x 3
            id colA colB
            <int> <chr> <chr>
            1 1 Y X
            2 2 Z Y
            3 3 Z Y
            4 4 NA NA


            If the second observation for an id can be NA, you could try adding a second fill after the first one, but this time fill down:



            df1 %>% 
            group_by(id) %>%
            fill(colA, colB, .direction = "up") %>%
            fill(colA, colB, .direction = "down") %>%
            ungroup() %>%
            distinct()





            share|improve this answer












            This answer is very dependent on your actual data being similar in structure to your example data.



            Your data:



            df1 <- structure(list(id = c(1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L), 
            colA = c(NA, "Y", "Z", "Z", "Z", "Z", NA, NA),
            colB = c("X", "X", NA, "Y", "Y", "Y", NA, NA)),
            class = "data.frame",
            row.names = c(NA, -8L))


            Assuming, as in your example, that each id occurs twice and that where one observation is NA, it is the first observation for that id, then this works:



            library(dplyr)
            library(tidyr)

            df1 %>%
            group_by(id) %>%
            fill(colA, colB, .direction = "up") %>%
            ungroup() %>%
            distinct()

            # A tibble: 4 x 3
            id colA colB
            <int> <chr> <chr>
            1 1 Y X
            2 2 Z Y
            3 3 Z Y
            4 4 NA NA


            If the second observation for an id can be NA, you could try adding a second fill after the first one, but this time fill down:



            df1 %>% 
            group_by(id) %>%
            fill(colA, colB, .direction = "up") %>%
            fill(colA, colB, .direction = "down") %>%
            ungroup() %>%
            distinct()






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 20 at 0:47









            neilfws

            17.5k53648




            17.5k53648

























                4














                First add a column that tells how many NAs in each row. Then using dplyr, remove duplicated rows first and then for each id keep the row with least missing values -



                df$test <- rowSums(is.na(df))

                df %>%
                filter(!duplicated(.)) %>%
                arrange(id, test) %>%
                group_by(id) %>%
                filter(row_number() == 1) %>%
                ungroup() %>%
                select(-test)

                # A tibble: 4 x 3
                id colA colB
                <int> <chr> <chr>
                1 1 y x
                2 2 z y
                3 3 z y
                4 4 <NA> <NA>


                EDIT:
                Actually no need to remove duplicates first. Just keeping the row with least missing values for each id should also work -



                df$test <- rowSums(is.na(df))

                df %>%
                arrange(id, test) %>%
                group_by(id) %>%
                filter(row_number() == 1) %>%
                ungroup() %>%
                select(-test)


                Data -



                df <- data.frame(
                id = c(rep(seq(1:4), each =2)), colA = c(NA, "y", "z", "z", "z", "z", NA, NA),
                colB = c("x", "x", NA, "y", "y", "y", NA, NA), stringsAsFactors = F)





                share|improve this answer




























                  4














                  First add a column that tells how many NAs in each row. Then using dplyr, remove duplicated rows first and then for each id keep the row with least missing values -



                  df$test <- rowSums(is.na(df))

                  df %>%
                  filter(!duplicated(.)) %>%
                  arrange(id, test) %>%
                  group_by(id) %>%
                  filter(row_number() == 1) %>%
                  ungroup() %>%
                  select(-test)

                  # A tibble: 4 x 3
                  id colA colB
                  <int> <chr> <chr>
                  1 1 y x
                  2 2 z y
                  3 3 z y
                  4 4 <NA> <NA>


                  EDIT:
                  Actually no need to remove duplicates first. Just keeping the row with least missing values for each id should also work -



                  df$test <- rowSums(is.na(df))

                  df %>%
                  arrange(id, test) %>%
                  group_by(id) %>%
                  filter(row_number() == 1) %>%
                  ungroup() %>%
                  select(-test)


                  Data -



                  df <- data.frame(
                  id = c(rep(seq(1:4), each =2)), colA = c(NA, "y", "z", "z", "z", "z", NA, NA),
                  colB = c("x", "x", NA, "y", "y", "y", NA, NA), stringsAsFactors = F)





                  share|improve this answer


























                    4












                    4








                    4






                    First add a column that tells how many NAs in each row. Then using dplyr, remove duplicated rows first and then for each id keep the row with least missing values -



                    df$test <- rowSums(is.na(df))

                    df %>%
                    filter(!duplicated(.)) %>%
                    arrange(id, test) %>%
                    group_by(id) %>%
                    filter(row_number() == 1) %>%
                    ungroup() %>%
                    select(-test)

                    # A tibble: 4 x 3
                    id colA colB
                    <int> <chr> <chr>
                    1 1 y x
                    2 2 z y
                    3 3 z y
                    4 4 <NA> <NA>


                    EDIT:
                    Actually no need to remove duplicates first. Just keeping the row with least missing values for each id should also work -



                    df$test <- rowSums(is.na(df))

                    df %>%
                    arrange(id, test) %>%
                    group_by(id) %>%
                    filter(row_number() == 1) %>%
                    ungroup() %>%
                    select(-test)


                    Data -



                    df <- data.frame(
                    id = c(rep(seq(1:4), each =2)), colA = c(NA, "y", "z", "z", "z", "z", NA, NA),
                    colB = c("x", "x", NA, "y", "y", "y", NA, NA), stringsAsFactors = F)





                    share|improve this answer














                    First add a column that tells how many NAs in each row. Then using dplyr, remove duplicated rows first and then for each id keep the row with least missing values -



                    df$test <- rowSums(is.na(df))

                    df %>%
                    filter(!duplicated(.)) %>%
                    arrange(id, test) %>%
                    group_by(id) %>%
                    filter(row_number() == 1) %>%
                    ungroup() %>%
                    select(-test)

                    # A tibble: 4 x 3
                    id colA colB
                    <int> <chr> <chr>
                    1 1 y x
                    2 2 z y
                    3 3 z y
                    4 4 <NA> <NA>


                    EDIT:
                    Actually no need to remove duplicates first. Just keeping the row with least missing values for each id should also work -



                    df$test <- rowSums(is.na(df))

                    df %>%
                    arrange(id, test) %>%
                    group_by(id) %>%
                    filter(row_number() == 1) %>%
                    ungroup() %>%
                    select(-test)


                    Data -



                    df <- data.frame(
                    id = c(rep(seq(1:4), each =2)), colA = c(NA, "y", "z", "z", "z", "z", NA, NA),
                    colB = c("x", "x", NA, "y", "y", "y", NA, NA), stringsAsFactors = F)






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Nov 20 at 14:23

























                    answered Nov 20 at 0:44









                    Shree

                    3,2861323




                    3,2861323























                        1














                        Creating dataframe - it helps if you post the code to make the sample data



                        df <- data.frame(id = c(rep(seq(1:4), each =2)), colA = c(NA, "y", "z", "z", "z", "z", NA, NA), colB = c("x", "x", NA, "y", "y", "y", NA, NA))


                        Removing rows with single NAs



                        for(i in 1:nrow(df)){

                        if(is.na(df[i,]$colA) & !is.na(df[i,]$colB) | !is.na(df[i,]$colA) & is.na(df[i,]$colB)){

                        df <- df[-i,]

                        }
                        }


                        Removing remaining duplicates (i.e. double NA rows)



                        df  <- df[!duplicated(df), ]


                        Output



                        df


                        Probably a more computationally efficient way of doing this but this ought to work.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          1














                          Creating dataframe - it helps if you post the code to make the sample data



                          df <- data.frame(id = c(rep(seq(1:4), each =2)), colA = c(NA, "y", "z", "z", "z", "z", NA, NA), colB = c("x", "x", NA, "y", "y", "y", NA, NA))


                          Removing rows with single NAs



                          for(i in 1:nrow(df)){

                          if(is.na(df[i,]$colA) & !is.na(df[i,]$colB) | !is.na(df[i,]$colA) & is.na(df[i,]$colB)){

                          df <- df[-i,]

                          }
                          }


                          Removing remaining duplicates (i.e. double NA rows)



                          df  <- df[!duplicated(df), ]


                          Output



                          df


                          Probably a more computationally efficient way of doing this but this ought to work.






                          share|improve this answer
























                            1












                            1








                            1






                            Creating dataframe - it helps if you post the code to make the sample data



                            df <- data.frame(id = c(rep(seq(1:4), each =2)), colA = c(NA, "y", "z", "z", "z", "z", NA, NA), colB = c("x", "x", NA, "y", "y", "y", NA, NA))


                            Removing rows with single NAs



                            for(i in 1:nrow(df)){

                            if(is.na(df[i,]$colA) & !is.na(df[i,]$colB) | !is.na(df[i,]$colA) & is.na(df[i,]$colB)){

                            df <- df[-i,]

                            }
                            }


                            Removing remaining duplicates (i.e. double NA rows)



                            df  <- df[!duplicated(df), ]


                            Output



                            df


                            Probably a more computationally efficient way of doing this but this ought to work.






                            share|improve this answer












                            Creating dataframe - it helps if you post the code to make the sample data



                            df <- data.frame(id = c(rep(seq(1:4), each =2)), colA = c(NA, "y", "z", "z", "z", "z", NA, NA), colB = c("x", "x", NA, "y", "y", "y", NA, NA))


                            Removing rows with single NAs



                            for(i in 1:nrow(df)){

                            if(is.na(df[i,]$colA) & !is.na(df[i,]$colB) | !is.na(df[i,]$colA) & is.na(df[i,]$colB)){

                            df <- df[-i,]

                            }
                            }


                            Removing remaining duplicates (i.e. double NA rows)



                            df  <- df[!duplicated(df), ]


                            Output



                            df


                            Probably a more computationally efficient way of doing this but this ought to work.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 20 at 0:32









                            André.B

                            528




                            528






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53384336%2fhow-to-fill-in-nas-of-various-columns-grouped-by-duplicated-ids-in-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                                Alcedinidae

                                Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?