No one or Anyone [duplicate]
This question already has an answer here:
What constitutes a double negative?
5 answers
My coworker uses this sentence to explain to our patients about our HIPPA Policy: "We cannot give your information out to no one."
The "no one" part catches me every time. I'd like to know if it's grammatically correct. I don't want to correct her when I don't even know if I'm correct. Is it "We cannot give your information out to no one", or "We cannot give your information to anyone" or "anybody"?
Please help!! It's driving me nuts!!!!
word-usage
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Spencer, Hot Licks, Kris, jimm101, Rory Alsop Dec 20 at 11:55
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
|
show 1 more comment
This question already has an answer here:
What constitutes a double negative?
5 answers
My coworker uses this sentence to explain to our patients about our HIPPA Policy: "We cannot give your information out to no one."
The "no one" part catches me every time. I'd like to know if it's grammatically correct. I don't want to correct her when I don't even know if I'm correct. Is it "We cannot give your information out to no one", or "We cannot give your information to anyone" or "anybody"?
Please help!! It's driving me nuts!!!!
word-usage
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Spencer, Hot Licks, Kris, jimm101, Rory Alsop Dec 20 at 11:55
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
3
This is a double negative, which is technically ungrammatical, but something you'll hear all the time in informal spoken English, especially in certain dialects. As a learner of English you should learn how to follow the rules before you are confident enough to break them. On the other hand, resist the remptation to correct people who use double negatives.
– Spencer
Dec 19 at 23:55
1
@Spencer You should put this as an answer, not a comment.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:22
@rpeinhardt Actually it's a duplicate.
– Spencer
Dec 20 at 0:27
I see, you're flagging the question as a duplicate.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:29
No, the utterer most definitely had not meant to use a double negative and so that's not the case at all. It's just an error as correctly noted by the OP: using no one where the speaker has actually meant any one.
– Kris
Dec 20 at 7:09
|
show 1 more comment
This question already has an answer here:
What constitutes a double negative?
5 answers
My coworker uses this sentence to explain to our patients about our HIPPA Policy: "We cannot give your information out to no one."
The "no one" part catches me every time. I'd like to know if it's grammatically correct. I don't want to correct her when I don't even know if I'm correct. Is it "We cannot give your information out to no one", or "We cannot give your information to anyone" or "anybody"?
Please help!! It's driving me nuts!!!!
word-usage
New contributor
This question already has an answer here:
What constitutes a double negative?
5 answers
My coworker uses this sentence to explain to our patients about our HIPPA Policy: "We cannot give your information out to no one."
The "no one" part catches me every time. I'd like to know if it's grammatically correct. I don't want to correct her when I don't even know if I'm correct. Is it "We cannot give your information out to no one", or "We cannot give your information to anyone" or "anybody"?
Please help!! It's driving me nuts!!!!
This question already has an answer here:
What constitutes a double negative?
5 answers
word-usage
word-usage
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Dec 19 at 23:27
Yasmin
6
6
New contributor
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Spencer, Hot Licks, Kris, jimm101, Rory Alsop Dec 20 at 11:55
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Spencer, Hot Licks, Kris, jimm101, Rory Alsop Dec 20 at 11:55
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
3
This is a double negative, which is technically ungrammatical, but something you'll hear all the time in informal spoken English, especially in certain dialects. As a learner of English you should learn how to follow the rules before you are confident enough to break them. On the other hand, resist the remptation to correct people who use double negatives.
– Spencer
Dec 19 at 23:55
1
@Spencer You should put this as an answer, not a comment.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:22
@rpeinhardt Actually it's a duplicate.
– Spencer
Dec 20 at 0:27
I see, you're flagging the question as a duplicate.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:29
No, the utterer most definitely had not meant to use a double negative and so that's not the case at all. It's just an error as correctly noted by the OP: using no one where the speaker has actually meant any one.
– Kris
Dec 20 at 7:09
|
show 1 more comment
3
This is a double negative, which is technically ungrammatical, but something you'll hear all the time in informal spoken English, especially in certain dialects. As a learner of English you should learn how to follow the rules before you are confident enough to break them. On the other hand, resist the remptation to correct people who use double negatives.
– Spencer
Dec 19 at 23:55
1
@Spencer You should put this as an answer, not a comment.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:22
@rpeinhardt Actually it's a duplicate.
– Spencer
Dec 20 at 0:27
I see, you're flagging the question as a duplicate.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:29
No, the utterer most definitely had not meant to use a double negative and so that's not the case at all. It's just an error as correctly noted by the OP: using no one where the speaker has actually meant any one.
– Kris
Dec 20 at 7:09
3
3
This is a double negative, which is technically ungrammatical, but something you'll hear all the time in informal spoken English, especially in certain dialects. As a learner of English you should learn how to follow the rules before you are confident enough to break them. On the other hand, resist the remptation to correct people who use double negatives.
– Spencer
Dec 19 at 23:55
This is a double negative, which is technically ungrammatical, but something you'll hear all the time in informal spoken English, especially in certain dialects. As a learner of English you should learn how to follow the rules before you are confident enough to break them. On the other hand, resist the remptation to correct people who use double negatives.
– Spencer
Dec 19 at 23:55
1
1
@Spencer You should put this as an answer, not a comment.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:22
@Spencer You should put this as an answer, not a comment.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:22
@rpeinhardt Actually it's a duplicate.
– Spencer
Dec 20 at 0:27
@rpeinhardt Actually it's a duplicate.
– Spencer
Dec 20 at 0:27
I see, you're flagging the question as a duplicate.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:29
I see, you're flagging the question as a duplicate.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:29
No, the utterer most definitely had not meant to use a double negative and so that's not the case at all. It's just an error as correctly noted by the OP: using no one where the speaker has actually meant any one.
– Kris
Dec 20 at 7:09
No, the utterer most definitely had not meant to use a double negative and so that's not the case at all. It's just an error as correctly noted by the OP: using no one where the speaker has actually meant any one.
– Kris
Dec 20 at 7:09
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
In all standard Englishes, as far as I know, you either use an explicit negator ("not","cannot", "don't" etc) or you use an explicit negative term ("no", "none", "never", "nothing", "nowhere" etc), but not both. With an explicit negator, you substitute a term with "any" ("any", "anyone", "anywhere" etc.)
Many people in various places throughout the Anglosphere use "no" terms with "not" in their speech, though many do not. But few people feel this "double negaton" is appropriate for in any kind of official notice.
So, many people might say "I won't tell no one", in their ordinary life but in a business context, most people think "We cannot give your information to anyone" is much better. There's nothing to choose between "anyone" and "anybody".
add a comment |
Two negatives make an affirmative, it's wrong. Choose any one— either
We can give your information out to no one(body). Or
We can not give your information out to anyone (body).
Any explanation after Colin Fine's seems redundant to me
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In all standard Englishes, as far as I know, you either use an explicit negator ("not","cannot", "don't" etc) or you use an explicit negative term ("no", "none", "never", "nothing", "nowhere" etc), but not both. With an explicit negator, you substitute a term with "any" ("any", "anyone", "anywhere" etc.)
Many people in various places throughout the Anglosphere use "no" terms with "not" in their speech, though many do not. But few people feel this "double negaton" is appropriate for in any kind of official notice.
So, many people might say "I won't tell no one", in their ordinary life but in a business context, most people think "We cannot give your information to anyone" is much better. There's nothing to choose between "anyone" and "anybody".
add a comment |
In all standard Englishes, as far as I know, you either use an explicit negator ("not","cannot", "don't" etc) or you use an explicit negative term ("no", "none", "never", "nothing", "nowhere" etc), but not both. With an explicit negator, you substitute a term with "any" ("any", "anyone", "anywhere" etc.)
Many people in various places throughout the Anglosphere use "no" terms with "not" in their speech, though many do not. But few people feel this "double negaton" is appropriate for in any kind of official notice.
So, many people might say "I won't tell no one", in their ordinary life but in a business context, most people think "We cannot give your information to anyone" is much better. There's nothing to choose between "anyone" and "anybody".
add a comment |
In all standard Englishes, as far as I know, you either use an explicit negator ("not","cannot", "don't" etc) or you use an explicit negative term ("no", "none", "never", "nothing", "nowhere" etc), but not both. With an explicit negator, you substitute a term with "any" ("any", "anyone", "anywhere" etc.)
Many people in various places throughout the Anglosphere use "no" terms with "not" in their speech, though many do not. But few people feel this "double negaton" is appropriate for in any kind of official notice.
So, many people might say "I won't tell no one", in their ordinary life but in a business context, most people think "We cannot give your information to anyone" is much better. There's nothing to choose between "anyone" and "anybody".
In all standard Englishes, as far as I know, you either use an explicit negator ("not","cannot", "don't" etc) or you use an explicit negative term ("no", "none", "never", "nothing", "nowhere" etc), but not both. With an explicit negator, you substitute a term with "any" ("any", "anyone", "anywhere" etc.)
Many people in various places throughout the Anglosphere use "no" terms with "not" in their speech, though many do not. But few people feel this "double negaton" is appropriate for in any kind of official notice.
So, many people might say "I won't tell no one", in their ordinary life but in a business context, most people think "We cannot give your information to anyone" is much better. There's nothing to choose between "anyone" and "anybody".
answered Dec 19 at 23:57
Colin Fine
63.6k170160
63.6k170160
add a comment |
add a comment |
Two negatives make an affirmative, it's wrong. Choose any one— either
We can give your information out to no one(body). Or
We can not give your information out to anyone (body).
Any explanation after Colin Fine's seems redundant to me
add a comment |
Two negatives make an affirmative, it's wrong. Choose any one— either
We can give your information out to no one(body). Or
We can not give your information out to anyone (body).
Any explanation after Colin Fine's seems redundant to me
add a comment |
Two negatives make an affirmative, it's wrong. Choose any one— either
We can give your information out to no one(body). Or
We can not give your information out to anyone (body).
Any explanation after Colin Fine's seems redundant to me
Two negatives make an affirmative, it's wrong. Choose any one— either
We can give your information out to no one(body). Or
We can not give your information out to anyone (body).
Any explanation after Colin Fine's seems redundant to me
answered Dec 20 at 1:24
Barid Baran Acharya
1,908613
1,908613
add a comment |
add a comment |
3
This is a double negative, which is technically ungrammatical, but something you'll hear all the time in informal spoken English, especially in certain dialects. As a learner of English you should learn how to follow the rules before you are confident enough to break them. On the other hand, resist the remptation to correct people who use double negatives.
– Spencer
Dec 19 at 23:55
1
@Spencer You should put this as an answer, not a comment.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:22
@rpeinhardt Actually it's a duplicate.
– Spencer
Dec 20 at 0:27
I see, you're flagging the question as a duplicate.
– rpeinhardt
Dec 20 at 0:29
No, the utterer most definitely had not meant to use a double negative and so that's not the case at all. It's just an error as correctly noted by the OP: using no one where the speaker has actually meant any one.
– Kris
Dec 20 at 7:09