Exact synonyms in English
Are there examples of exact synonyms in English. That is where, at least in some specific context, you can you use either word and no one will say"one is old fashioned" or "one is dialect" or "they have slightly different meanings" or anything similar?
meaning synonyms
asked Sep 24 at 20:58
David Robinson
1,878214
|
show 7 more comments
Are there examples of exact synonyms in English. That is where, at least in some specific context, you can you use either word and no one will say"one is old fashioned" or "one is dialect" or "they have slightly different meanings" or anything similar?
meaning synonyms
asked Sep 24 at 20:58
David Robinson
1,878214
4
There is no such thing as an exact synonym. If nothing else, one may carry a connotation from its use in movie or some such.
– Hot Licks
Sep 24 at 21:04
Agree that in general there aren't exact synonyms, but in a certin contexts you could use 'sick' and 'ill' pretty interchangeably.
– S Conroy
Sep 24 at 21:23
1
A big liar is not a large liar (unless he tweets from the white house).
– AmI
Sep 24 at 22:33
1
Your best bet is with euphemisms. Anything to do with drunkenness, getting fired, near-sexual terms used for failure (or success), money, and so on.
– Global Charm
Sep 25 at 2:56
1
There aren't any absolutely exact synonyms. We use words which are called stylistic synonyms. They seem to be exact, but, in fact, differ I
– user307254
Sep 25 at 5:37
|
show 7 more comments
Are there examples of exact synonyms in English. That is where, at least in some specific context, you can you use either word and no one will say"one is old fashioned" or "one is dialect" or "they have slightly different meanings" or anything similar?
meaning synonyms
asked Sep 24 at 20:58
David Robinson
1,878214
Are there examples of exact synonyms in English. That is where, at least in some specific context, you can you use either word and no one will say"one is old fashioned" or "one is dialect" or "they have slightly different meanings" or anything similar?
meaning synonyms
meaning synonyms
asked Sep 24 at 20:58
David Robinson
1,878214
asked Sep 24 at 20:58
David Robinson
1,878214
asked Sep 24 at 20:58
David Robinson
1,878214
asked Sep 24 at 20:58
David Robinson
1,878214
asked Sep 24 at 20:58
David Robinson
1,878214
1,878214
4
There is no such thing as an exact synonym. If nothing else, one may carry a connotation from its use in movie or some such.
– Hot Licks
Sep 24 at 21:04
Agree that in general there aren't exact synonyms, but in a certin contexts you could use 'sick' and 'ill' pretty interchangeably.
– S Conroy
Sep 24 at 21:23
1
A big liar is not a large liar (unless he tweets from the white house).
– AmI
Sep 24 at 22:33
1
Your best bet is with euphemisms. Anything to do with drunkenness, getting fired, near-sexual terms used for failure (or success), money, and so on.
– Global Charm
Sep 25 at 2:56
1
There aren't any absolutely exact synonyms. We use words which are called stylistic synonyms. They seem to be exact, but, in fact, differ I
– user307254
Sep 25 at 5:37
|
show 7 more comments
4
There is no such thing as an exact synonym. If nothing else, one may carry a connotation from its use in movie or some such.
– Hot Licks
Sep 24 at 21:04
Agree that in general there aren't exact synonyms, but in a certin contexts you could use 'sick' and 'ill' pretty interchangeably.
– S Conroy
Sep 24 at 21:23
1
A big liar is not a large liar (unless he tweets from the white house).
– AmI
Sep 24 at 22:33
1
Your best bet is with euphemisms. Anything to do with drunkenness, getting fired, near-sexual terms used for failure (or success), money, and so on.
– Global Charm
Sep 25 at 2:56
1
There aren't any absolutely exact synonyms. We use words which are called stylistic synonyms. They seem to be exact, but, in fact, differ I
– user307254
Sep 25 at 5:37
4
4
There is no such thing as an exact synonym. If nothing else, one may carry a connotation from its use in movie or some such.
– Hot Licks
Sep 24 at 21:04
There is no such thing as an exact synonym. If nothing else, one may carry a connotation from its use in movie or some such.
– Hot Licks
Sep 24 at 21:04
Agree that in general there aren't exact synonyms, but in a certin contexts you could use 'sick' and 'ill' pretty interchangeably.
– S Conroy
Sep 24 at 21:23
Agree that in general there aren't exact synonyms, but in a certin contexts you could use 'sick' and 'ill' pretty interchangeably.
– S Conroy
Sep 24 at 21:23
1
1
A big liar is not a large liar (unless he tweets from the white house).
– AmI
Sep 24 at 22:33
A big liar is not a large liar (unless he tweets from the white house).
– AmI
Sep 24 at 22:33
1
1
Your best bet is with euphemisms. Anything to do with drunkenness, getting fired, near-sexual terms used for failure (or success), money, and so on.
– Global Charm
Sep 25 at 2:56
Your best bet is with euphemisms. Anything to do with drunkenness, getting fired, near-sexual terms used for failure (or success), money, and so on.
– Global Charm
Sep 25 at 2:56
1
1
There aren't any absolutely exact synonyms. We use words which are called stylistic synonyms. They seem to be exact, but, in fact, differ I
– user307254
Sep 25 at 5:37
There aren't any absolutely exact synonyms. We use words which are called stylistic synonyms. They seem to be exact, but, in fact, differ I
– user307254
Sep 25 at 5:37
|
show 7 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
A particular language is not a computer language. Human languages are not designed, aren't made with deterministic parsers and semantic mappings (many programming languages aren't either!). Any attempt to give specific rules to human language is only an approximation to something that is somewhat fluid to begin with. Dictionaries didn't come first; the use of the words just is and lexicographers are just trying to capture meanings as well as they can.
As to vocabulary, people will use words that work for them, and sometimes adopt others they hear. Meanings are in peoples heads and we can only access those meanings through mapping an unshared (non-telepathic) cognitive situation to sound streams. This leads to the slightest drift of meaning around a sound sequence (word). (I'm not even discussing how the sounds change too.)
There are many ways to define 'define' or give the meaning of 'meaning'. They are all just attempts.
- denotative meaning - a formulation of semantics in an unambiguous, non-vague, consistent and complete logical language.
connotative meaning - connections, collocations, contexts, vague feelings of nearby-ness.
stipulative definition - a meaning is assigned ('stipulated') for a given sound sequence
- usage definition - a given sound sequence is used
Human language only follows 'usage' definitions. Mathematics, the sciences and technology do have a good portion of their vocabulary stipulated. Someone says "From now on, 'blurp' means 'take an allen wrench at 45 degrees from the plane but matching the hex hole and twist counter-clockwise'". Now 'blurp' has that stipulated meaning, and if someone uses 'blurp' for '30 degrees' or on phillips sockets, etc, then they are using the word 'blurp' wrong.
Take for example 'pail' and 'bucket'. What do they mean? They are pretty obviously refer to the same kinds of object, a cylindrical slightly conical receptacle open on one end.
Can two different sound sequences have the same denotative meaning? Yes. This is very easy in stipulative definitions. Also fairly easy (as in the case of pail and bucket) when there is a simple easily verifiable statement. But... sometimes things are left out. There may be subtle things left out of the denotative definition. And the connotations are almost always left out.
It is extremely difficult in usage definitions because there are so many different contexts that a word can appear in that probability wise it is unlikely.
Now to the question: are there any exact synonyms in English?
In technical English there certainly are (these might be called analytic a priori truths)... but you know, I just gave a speech above about stipulative definitions, but even there there is semantic drift. Even in math, the terminology changes because we're human and even technical terms lose their edge, get associated with some things rather than others.
But in non-technical language?
There are lots questions about two given words is X an exact synonym of Y. A lot of times the answer is, 'Wow it sure is hard to tell those two apart... sure, let's call them exact'. But the world is large and there are so many things we don't know about what we know (about how we use words). It's easy enough to reflect on one's inner connections about a word ('pail and bucket are identical! except I think of a pail as never being made out of wood')
So the answer really is
There are no exact synonyms.
Note:
- There is nothing here that is particular to English. This could easily be asked on Linguistics.SE or Philosophy.SE.
- Although there are two perfectly good possible duplicates, the title here is very specific and I can find no response elsewhere here on ELU that addresses this directly.
answered Dec 20 at 15:28
Mitch
50.2k15101211
add a comment |
Absolute (complete, full) synonyms can be found only in terminology.
For example, in linguistics:
Inflection - ending,
Antonyms - opposites,
Homophones - heterographs,
Homographs - heterophones,
Semantics (of the word) - meaning,
etc.
answered Dec 20 at 4:46
user307254
2,600211
I would tend to disagree, mutation for example could also be used in biology, and there are heterographs that my be heterophones (i.e. completely different words).
– A Lambent Eye
Dec 20 at 8:41
None of those are synonymous except in specific contexts. Consonant gradation, for example, is completely unrelated to ablaut, initial mutations are not umlaut, there are non-inflectional endings, homophones need not be heterographs (and vice versa), etc.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 20 at 9:05
And there are non-ending inflections too. The German inflection ge comes at the beginning of gekommen and in the middle of angekommen. ee is an inflected form of oo in the middle of feet. In Scots Gaelic a bhàta, /ə ˈvaːtə/ "his boat", the h inflects the b from /b/ to /v/.
– David Robinson
Dec 20 at 16:16
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f465562%2fexact-synonyms-in-english%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
A particular language is not a computer language. Human languages are not designed, aren't made with deterministic parsers and semantic mappings (many programming languages aren't either!). Any attempt to give specific rules to human language is only an approximation to something that is somewhat fluid to begin with. Dictionaries didn't come first; the use of the words just is and lexicographers are just trying to capture meanings as well as they can.
As to vocabulary, people will use words that work for them, and sometimes adopt others they hear. Meanings are in peoples heads and we can only access those meanings through mapping an unshared (non-telepathic) cognitive situation to sound streams. This leads to the slightest drift of meaning around a sound sequence (word). (I'm not even discussing how the sounds change too.)
There are many ways to define 'define' or give the meaning of 'meaning'. They are all just attempts.
- denotative meaning - a formulation of semantics in an unambiguous, non-vague, consistent and complete logical language.
connotative meaning - connections, collocations, contexts, vague feelings of nearby-ness.
stipulative definition - a meaning is assigned ('stipulated') for a given sound sequence
- usage definition - a given sound sequence is used
Human language only follows 'usage' definitions. Mathematics, the sciences and technology do have a good portion of their vocabulary stipulated. Someone says "From now on, 'blurp' means 'take an allen wrench at 45 degrees from the plane but matching the hex hole and twist counter-clockwise'". Now 'blurp' has that stipulated meaning, and if someone uses 'blurp' for '30 degrees' or on phillips sockets, etc, then they are using the word 'blurp' wrong.
Take for example 'pail' and 'bucket'. What do they mean? They are pretty obviously refer to the same kinds of object, a cylindrical slightly conical receptacle open on one end.
Can two different sound sequences have the same denotative meaning? Yes. This is very easy in stipulative definitions. Also fairly easy (as in the case of pail and bucket) when there is a simple easily verifiable statement. But... sometimes things are left out. There may be subtle things left out of the denotative definition. And the connotations are almost always left out.
It is extremely difficult in usage definitions because there are so many different contexts that a word can appear in that probability wise it is unlikely.
Now to the question: are there any exact synonyms in English?
In technical English there certainly are (these might be called analytic a priori truths)... but you know, I just gave a speech above about stipulative definitions, but even there there is semantic drift. Even in math, the terminology changes because we're human and even technical terms lose their edge, get associated with some things rather than others.
But in non-technical language?
There are lots questions about two given words is X an exact synonym of Y. A lot of times the answer is, 'Wow it sure is hard to tell those two apart... sure, let's call them exact'. But the world is large and there are so many things we don't know about what we know (about how we use words). It's easy enough to reflect on one's inner connections about a word ('pail and bucket are identical! except I think of a pail as never being made out of wood')
So the answer really is
There are no exact synonyms.
Note:
- There is nothing here that is particular to English. This could easily be asked on Linguistics.SE or Philosophy.SE.
- Although there are two perfectly good possible duplicates, the title here is very specific and I can find no response elsewhere here on ELU that addresses this directly.
answered Dec 20 at 15:28
Mitch
50.2k15101211
add a comment |
A particular language is not a computer language. Human languages are not designed, aren't made with deterministic parsers and semantic mappings (many programming languages aren't either!). Any attempt to give specific rules to human language is only an approximation to something that is somewhat fluid to begin with. Dictionaries didn't come first; the use of the words just is and lexicographers are just trying to capture meanings as well as they can.
As to vocabulary, people will use words that work for them, and sometimes adopt others they hear. Meanings are in peoples heads and we can only access those meanings through mapping an unshared (non-telepathic) cognitive situation to sound streams. This leads to the slightest drift of meaning around a sound sequence (word). (I'm not even discussing how the sounds change too.)
There are many ways to define 'define' or give the meaning of 'meaning'. They are all just attempts.
- denotative meaning - a formulation of semantics in an unambiguous, non-vague, consistent and complete logical language.
connotative meaning - connections, collocations, contexts, vague feelings of nearby-ness.
stipulative definition - a meaning is assigned ('stipulated') for a given sound sequence
- usage definition - a given sound sequence is used
Human language only follows 'usage' definitions. Mathematics, the sciences and technology do have a good portion of their vocabulary stipulated. Someone says "From now on, 'blurp' means 'take an allen wrench at 45 degrees from the plane but matching the hex hole and twist counter-clockwise'". Now 'blurp' has that stipulated meaning, and if someone uses 'blurp' for '30 degrees' or on phillips sockets, etc, then they are using the word 'blurp' wrong.
Take for example 'pail' and 'bucket'. What do they mean? They are pretty obviously refer to the same kinds of object, a cylindrical slightly conical receptacle open on one end.
Can two different sound sequences have the same denotative meaning? Yes. This is very easy in stipulative definitions. Also fairly easy (as in the case of pail and bucket) when there is a simple easily verifiable statement. But... sometimes things are left out. There may be subtle things left out of the denotative definition. And the connotations are almost always left out.
It is extremely difficult in usage definitions because there are so many different contexts that a word can appear in that probability wise it is unlikely.
Now to the question: are there any exact synonyms in English?
In technical English there certainly are (these might be called analytic a priori truths)... but you know, I just gave a speech above about stipulative definitions, but even there there is semantic drift. Even in math, the terminology changes because we're human and even technical terms lose their edge, get associated with some things rather than others.
But in non-technical language?
There are lots questions about two given words is X an exact synonym of Y. A lot of times the answer is, 'Wow it sure is hard to tell those two apart... sure, let's call them exact'. But the world is large and there are so many things we don't know about what we know (about how we use words). It's easy enough to reflect on one's inner connections about a word ('pail and bucket are identical! except I think of a pail as never being made out of wood')
So the answer really is
There are no exact synonyms.
Note:
- There is nothing here that is particular to English. This could easily be asked on Linguistics.SE or Philosophy.SE.
- Although there are two perfectly good possible duplicates, the title here is very specific and I can find no response elsewhere here on ELU that addresses this directly.
answered Dec 20 at 15:28
Mitch
50.2k15101211
add a comment |
A particular language is not a computer language. Human languages are not designed, aren't made with deterministic parsers and semantic mappings (many programming languages aren't either!). Any attempt to give specific rules to human language is only an approximation to something that is somewhat fluid to begin with. Dictionaries didn't come first; the use of the words just is and lexicographers are just trying to capture meanings as well as they can.
As to vocabulary, people will use words that work for them, and sometimes adopt others they hear. Meanings are in peoples heads and we can only access those meanings through mapping an unshared (non-telepathic) cognitive situation to sound streams. This leads to the slightest drift of meaning around a sound sequence (word). (I'm not even discussing how the sounds change too.)
There are many ways to define 'define' or give the meaning of 'meaning'. They are all just attempts.
- denotative meaning - a formulation of semantics in an unambiguous, non-vague, consistent and complete logical language.
connotative meaning - connections, collocations, contexts, vague feelings of nearby-ness.
stipulative definition - a meaning is assigned ('stipulated') for a given sound sequence
- usage definition - a given sound sequence is used
Human language only follows 'usage' definitions. Mathematics, the sciences and technology do have a good portion of their vocabulary stipulated. Someone says "From now on, 'blurp' means 'take an allen wrench at 45 degrees from the plane but matching the hex hole and twist counter-clockwise'". Now 'blurp' has that stipulated meaning, and if someone uses 'blurp' for '30 degrees' or on phillips sockets, etc, then they are using the word 'blurp' wrong.
Take for example 'pail' and 'bucket'. What do they mean? They are pretty obviously refer to the same kinds of object, a cylindrical slightly conical receptacle open on one end.
Can two different sound sequences have the same denotative meaning? Yes. This is very easy in stipulative definitions. Also fairly easy (as in the case of pail and bucket) when there is a simple easily verifiable statement. But... sometimes things are left out. There may be subtle things left out of the denotative definition. And the connotations are almost always left out.
It is extremely difficult in usage definitions because there are so many different contexts that a word can appear in that probability wise it is unlikely.
Now to the question: are there any exact synonyms in English?
In technical English there certainly are (these might be called analytic a priori truths)... but you know, I just gave a speech above about stipulative definitions, but even there there is semantic drift. Even in math, the terminology changes because we're human and even technical terms lose their edge, get associated with some things rather than others.
But in non-technical language?
There are lots questions about two given words is X an exact synonym of Y. A lot of times the answer is, 'Wow it sure is hard to tell those two apart... sure, let's call them exact'. But the world is large and there are so many things we don't know about what we know (about how we use words). It's easy enough to reflect on one's inner connections about a word ('pail and bucket are identical! except I think of a pail as never being made out of wood')
So the answer really is
There are no exact synonyms.
Note:
- There is nothing here that is particular to English. This could easily be asked on Linguistics.SE or Philosophy.SE.
- Although there are two perfectly good possible duplicates, the title here is very specific and I can find no response elsewhere here on ELU that addresses this directly.
answered Dec 20 at 15:28
Mitch
50.2k15101211
A particular language is not a computer language. Human languages are not designed, aren't made with deterministic parsers and semantic mappings (many programming languages aren't either!). Any attempt to give specific rules to human language is only an approximation to something that is somewhat fluid to begin with. Dictionaries didn't come first; the use of the words just is and lexicographers are just trying to capture meanings as well as they can.
As to vocabulary, people will use words that work for them, and sometimes adopt others they hear. Meanings are in peoples heads and we can only access those meanings through mapping an unshared (non-telepathic) cognitive situation to sound streams. This leads to the slightest drift of meaning around a sound sequence (word). (I'm not even discussing how the sounds change too.)
There are many ways to define 'define' or give the meaning of 'meaning'. They are all just attempts.
- denotative meaning - a formulation of semantics in an unambiguous, non-vague, consistent and complete logical language.
connotative meaning - connections, collocations, contexts, vague feelings of nearby-ness.
stipulative definition - a meaning is assigned ('stipulated') for a given sound sequence
- usage definition - a given sound sequence is used
Human language only follows 'usage' definitions. Mathematics, the sciences and technology do have a good portion of their vocabulary stipulated. Someone says "From now on, 'blurp' means 'take an allen wrench at 45 degrees from the plane but matching the hex hole and twist counter-clockwise'". Now 'blurp' has that stipulated meaning, and if someone uses 'blurp' for '30 degrees' or on phillips sockets, etc, then they are using the word 'blurp' wrong.
Take for example 'pail' and 'bucket'. What do they mean? They are pretty obviously refer to the same kinds of object, a cylindrical slightly conical receptacle open on one end.
Can two different sound sequences have the same denotative meaning? Yes. This is very easy in stipulative definitions. Also fairly easy (as in the case of pail and bucket) when there is a simple easily verifiable statement. But... sometimes things are left out. There may be subtle things left out of the denotative definition. And the connotations are almost always left out.
It is extremely difficult in usage definitions because there are so many different contexts that a word can appear in that probability wise it is unlikely.
Now to the question: are there any exact synonyms in English?
In technical English there certainly are (these might be called analytic a priori truths)... but you know, I just gave a speech above about stipulative definitions, but even there there is semantic drift. Even in math, the terminology changes because we're human and even technical terms lose their edge, get associated with some things rather than others.
But in non-technical language?
There are lots questions about two given words is X an exact synonym of Y. A lot of times the answer is, 'Wow it sure is hard to tell those two apart... sure, let's call them exact'. But the world is large and there are so many things we don't know about what we know (about how we use words). It's easy enough to reflect on one's inner connections about a word ('pail and bucket are identical! except I think of a pail as never being made out of wood')
So the answer really is
There are no exact synonyms.
Note:
- There is nothing here that is particular to English. This could easily be asked on Linguistics.SE or Philosophy.SE.
- Although there are two perfectly good possible duplicates, the title here is very specific and I can find no response elsewhere here on ELU that addresses this directly.
answered Dec 20 at 15:28
Mitch
50.2k15101211
answered Dec 20 at 15:28
Mitch
50.2k15101211
answered Dec 20 at 15:28
Mitch
50.2k15101211
answered Dec 20 at 15:28
Mitch
50.2k15101211
50.2k15101211
add a comment |
add a comment |
Absolute (complete, full) synonyms can be found only in terminology.
For example, in linguistics:
Inflection - ending,
Antonyms - opposites,
Homophones - heterographs,
Homographs - heterophones,
Semantics (of the word) - meaning,
etc.
answered Dec 20 at 4:46
user307254
2,600211
I would tend to disagree, mutation for example could also be used in biology, and there are heterographs that my be heterophones (i.e. completely different words).
– A Lambent Eye
Dec 20 at 8:41
None of those are synonymous except in specific contexts. Consonant gradation, for example, is completely unrelated to ablaut, initial mutations are not umlaut, there are non-inflectional endings, homophones need not be heterographs (and vice versa), etc.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 20 at 9:05
And there are non-ending inflections too. The German inflection ge comes at the beginning of gekommen and in the middle of angekommen. ee is an inflected form of oo in the middle of feet. In Scots Gaelic a bhàta, /ə ˈvaːtə/ "his boat", the h inflects the b from /b/ to /v/.
– David Robinson
Dec 20 at 16:16
add a comment |
Absolute (complete, full) synonyms can be found only in terminology.
For example, in linguistics:
Inflection - ending,
Antonyms - opposites,
Homophones - heterographs,
Homographs - heterophones,
Semantics (of the word) - meaning,
etc.
answered Dec 20 at 4:46
user307254
2,600211
I would tend to disagree, mutation for example could also be used in biology, and there are heterographs that my be heterophones (i.e. completely different words).
– A Lambent Eye
Dec 20 at 8:41
None of those are synonymous except in specific contexts. Consonant gradation, for example, is completely unrelated to ablaut, initial mutations are not umlaut, there are non-inflectional endings, homophones need not be heterographs (and vice versa), etc.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 20 at 9:05
And there are non-ending inflections too. The German inflection ge comes at the beginning of gekommen and in the middle of angekommen. ee is an inflected form of oo in the middle of feet. In Scots Gaelic a bhàta, /ə ˈvaːtə/ "his boat", the h inflects the b from /b/ to /v/.
– David Robinson
Dec 20 at 16:16
add a comment |
Absolute (complete, full) synonyms can be found only in terminology.
For example, in linguistics:
Inflection - ending,
Antonyms - opposites,
Homophones - heterographs,
Homographs - heterophones,
Semantics (of the word) - meaning,
etc.
answered Dec 20 at 4:46
user307254
2,600211
Absolute (complete, full) synonyms can be found only in terminology.
For example, in linguistics:
Inflection - ending,
Antonyms - opposites,
Homophones - heterographs,
Homographs - heterophones,
Semantics (of the word) - meaning,
etc.
answered Dec 20 at 4:46
user307254
2,600211
edited Dec 20 at 9:13
answered Dec 20 at 4:46
user307254
2,600211
answered Dec 20 at 4:46
user307254
2,600211
answered Dec 20 at 4:46
user307254
2,600211
2,600211
I would tend to disagree, mutation for example could also be used in biology, and there are heterographs that my be heterophones (i.e. completely different words).
– A Lambent Eye
Dec 20 at 8:41
None of those are synonymous except in specific contexts. Consonant gradation, for example, is completely unrelated to ablaut, initial mutations are not umlaut, there are non-inflectional endings, homophones need not be heterographs (and vice versa), etc.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 20 at 9:05
And there are non-ending inflections too. The German inflection ge comes at the beginning of gekommen and in the middle of angekommen. ee is an inflected form of oo in the middle of feet. In Scots Gaelic a bhàta, /ə ˈvaːtə/ "his boat", the h inflects the b from /b/ to /v/.
– David Robinson
Dec 20 at 16:16
add a comment |
I would tend to disagree, mutation for example could also be used in biology, and there are heterographs that my be heterophones (i.e. completely different words).
– A Lambent Eye
Dec 20 at 8:41
None of those are synonymous except in specific contexts. Consonant gradation, for example, is completely unrelated to ablaut, initial mutations are not umlaut, there are non-inflectional endings, homophones need not be heterographs (and vice versa), etc.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 20 at 9:05
And there are non-ending inflections too. The German inflection ge comes at the beginning of gekommen and in the middle of angekommen. ee is an inflected form of oo in the middle of feet. In Scots Gaelic a bhàta, /ə ˈvaːtə/ "his boat", the h inflects the b from /b/ to /v/.
– David Robinson
Dec 20 at 16:16
I would tend to disagree, mutation for example could also be used in biology, and there are heterographs that my be heterophones (i.e. completely different words).
– A Lambent Eye
Dec 20 at 8:41
I would tend to disagree, mutation for example could also be used in biology, and there are heterographs that my be heterophones (i.e. completely different words).
– A Lambent Eye
Dec 20 at 8:41
None of those are synonymous except in specific contexts. Consonant gradation, for example, is completely unrelated to ablaut, initial mutations are not umlaut, there are non-inflectional endings, homophones need not be heterographs (and vice versa), etc.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 20 at 9:05
None of those are synonymous except in specific contexts. Consonant gradation, for example, is completely unrelated to ablaut, initial mutations are not umlaut, there are non-inflectional endings, homophones need not be heterographs (and vice versa), etc.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 20 at 9:05
And there are non-ending inflections too. The German inflection ge comes at the beginning of gekommen and in the middle of angekommen. ee is an inflected form of oo in the middle of feet. In Scots Gaelic a bhàta, /ə ˈvaːtə/ "his boat", the h inflects the b from /b/ to /v/.
– David Robinson
Dec 20 at 16:16
And there are non-ending inflections too. The German inflection ge comes at the beginning of gekommen and in the middle of angekommen. ee is an inflected form of oo in the middle of feet. In Scots Gaelic a bhàta, /ə ˈvaːtə/ "his boat", the h inflects the b from /b/ to /v/.
– David Robinson
Dec 20 at 16:16
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f465562%2fexact-synonyms-in-english%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
There is no such thing as an exact synonym. If nothing else, one may carry a connotation from its use in movie or some such.
– Hot Licks
Sep 24 at 21:04
Agree that in general there aren't exact synonyms, but in a certin contexts you could use 'sick' and 'ill' pretty interchangeably.
– S Conroy
Sep 24 at 21:23
1
A big liar is not a large liar (unless he tweets from the white house).
– AmI
Sep 24 at 22:33
1
Your best bet is with euphemisms. Anything to do with drunkenness, getting fired, near-sexual terms used for failure (or success), money, and so on.
– Global Charm
Sep 25 at 2:56
1
There aren't any absolutely exact synonyms. We use words which are called stylistic synonyms. They seem to be exact, but, in fact, differ I
– user307254
Sep 25 at 5:37