Number that can eat itself











up vote
29
down vote

favorite
3












Given a positive integer, output a truthy/falsy value as to whether the number can eat itself.



Rules



Leftmost is the head, rightmost is the tail



If the head is greater than or equal to the tail, the head eats the tail and the new head becomes their sum.



If $sum ge 10 $ then the head is replaced by $sum mod 10$.



$sum=0$ cannot be ignored, however the input number will never have any leading zeroes.



Example:



number=2632
head-2, tail-2

2632 -> 463
head-4, tail-3

463 -> 76
head-7, tail-6

76 -> 3
If only one digit remains in the end, the number can eat itself.


If at any point the head cannot eat the tail, the answer will be False.



number=6724
072
False (0<2)


Test Cases:



True:
[2632, 92258, 60282, 38410,3210, 2302, 2742, 8628, 6793, 1, 2, 10, 100, 55, 121]

False:
[6724, 47, 472, 60247, 33265, 79350, 83147, 93101, 57088, 69513, 62738, 54754, 23931, 7164, 5289, 3435, 3949, 8630, 5018, 6715, 340, 2194]


This is code-golf so shortest code wins.










share|improve this question
























  • Can we take input as a string?
    – lirtosiast
    Dec 7 at 8:20










  • @lirtosiast, yes, but not list of digits.
    – Vedant Kandoi
    Dec 7 at 8:23






  • 13




    They could be called Autocannibalistic Numbers.
    – Arnauld
    Dec 7 at 10:20






  • 5




    What is the reason we can't take as a list of digits? This problem already treats them as if they are lists of digits. Forcing them to be numbers means that you just have to pin extra code to convert them to a list.
    – Post Left Garf Hunter
    Dec 7 at 14:09






  • 1




    Can two consistent distinct values be returned instead of truthy/falsy?
    – Olivier Grégoire
    Dec 7 at 17:22















up vote
29
down vote

favorite
3












Given a positive integer, output a truthy/falsy value as to whether the number can eat itself.



Rules



Leftmost is the head, rightmost is the tail



If the head is greater than or equal to the tail, the head eats the tail and the new head becomes their sum.



If $sum ge 10 $ then the head is replaced by $sum mod 10$.



$sum=0$ cannot be ignored, however the input number will never have any leading zeroes.



Example:



number=2632
head-2, tail-2

2632 -> 463
head-4, tail-3

463 -> 76
head-7, tail-6

76 -> 3
If only one digit remains in the end, the number can eat itself.


If at any point the head cannot eat the tail, the answer will be False.



number=6724
072
False (0<2)


Test Cases:



True:
[2632, 92258, 60282, 38410,3210, 2302, 2742, 8628, 6793, 1, 2, 10, 100, 55, 121]

False:
[6724, 47, 472, 60247, 33265, 79350, 83147, 93101, 57088, 69513, 62738, 54754, 23931, 7164, 5289, 3435, 3949, 8630, 5018, 6715, 340, 2194]


This is code-golf so shortest code wins.










share|improve this question
























  • Can we take input as a string?
    – lirtosiast
    Dec 7 at 8:20










  • @lirtosiast, yes, but not list of digits.
    – Vedant Kandoi
    Dec 7 at 8:23






  • 13




    They could be called Autocannibalistic Numbers.
    – Arnauld
    Dec 7 at 10:20






  • 5




    What is the reason we can't take as a list of digits? This problem already treats them as if they are lists of digits. Forcing them to be numbers means that you just have to pin extra code to convert them to a list.
    – Post Left Garf Hunter
    Dec 7 at 14:09






  • 1




    Can two consistent distinct values be returned instead of truthy/falsy?
    – Olivier Grégoire
    Dec 7 at 17:22













up vote
29
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
29
down vote

favorite
3






3





Given a positive integer, output a truthy/falsy value as to whether the number can eat itself.



Rules



Leftmost is the head, rightmost is the tail



If the head is greater than or equal to the tail, the head eats the tail and the new head becomes their sum.



If $sum ge 10 $ then the head is replaced by $sum mod 10$.



$sum=0$ cannot be ignored, however the input number will never have any leading zeroes.



Example:



number=2632
head-2, tail-2

2632 -> 463
head-4, tail-3

463 -> 76
head-7, tail-6

76 -> 3
If only one digit remains in the end, the number can eat itself.


If at any point the head cannot eat the tail, the answer will be False.



number=6724
072
False (0<2)


Test Cases:



True:
[2632, 92258, 60282, 38410,3210, 2302, 2742, 8628, 6793, 1, 2, 10, 100, 55, 121]

False:
[6724, 47, 472, 60247, 33265, 79350, 83147, 93101, 57088, 69513, 62738, 54754, 23931, 7164, 5289, 3435, 3949, 8630, 5018, 6715, 340, 2194]


This is code-golf so shortest code wins.










share|improve this question















Given a positive integer, output a truthy/falsy value as to whether the number can eat itself.



Rules



Leftmost is the head, rightmost is the tail



If the head is greater than or equal to the tail, the head eats the tail and the new head becomes their sum.



If $sum ge 10 $ then the head is replaced by $sum mod 10$.



$sum=0$ cannot be ignored, however the input number will never have any leading zeroes.



Example:



number=2632
head-2, tail-2

2632 -> 463
head-4, tail-3

463 -> 76
head-7, tail-6

76 -> 3
If only one digit remains in the end, the number can eat itself.


If at any point the head cannot eat the tail, the answer will be False.



number=6724
072
False (0<2)


Test Cases:



True:
[2632, 92258, 60282, 38410,3210, 2302, 2742, 8628, 6793, 1, 2, 10, 100, 55, 121]

False:
[6724, 47, 472, 60247, 33265, 79350, 83147, 93101, 57088, 69513, 62738, 54754, 23931, 7164, 5289, 3435, 3949, 8630, 5018, 6715, 340, 2194]


This is code-golf so shortest code wins.







code-golf decision-problem






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 8 at 3:00









Veskah

78714




78714










asked Dec 7 at 7:42









Vedant Kandoi

913223




913223












  • Can we take input as a string?
    – lirtosiast
    Dec 7 at 8:20










  • @lirtosiast, yes, but not list of digits.
    – Vedant Kandoi
    Dec 7 at 8:23






  • 13




    They could be called Autocannibalistic Numbers.
    – Arnauld
    Dec 7 at 10:20






  • 5




    What is the reason we can't take as a list of digits? This problem already treats them as if they are lists of digits. Forcing them to be numbers means that you just have to pin extra code to convert them to a list.
    – Post Left Garf Hunter
    Dec 7 at 14:09






  • 1




    Can two consistent distinct values be returned instead of truthy/falsy?
    – Olivier Grégoire
    Dec 7 at 17:22


















  • Can we take input as a string?
    – lirtosiast
    Dec 7 at 8:20










  • @lirtosiast, yes, but not list of digits.
    – Vedant Kandoi
    Dec 7 at 8:23






  • 13




    They could be called Autocannibalistic Numbers.
    – Arnauld
    Dec 7 at 10:20






  • 5




    What is the reason we can't take as a list of digits? This problem already treats them as if they are lists of digits. Forcing them to be numbers means that you just have to pin extra code to convert them to a list.
    – Post Left Garf Hunter
    Dec 7 at 14:09






  • 1




    Can two consistent distinct values be returned instead of truthy/falsy?
    – Olivier Grégoire
    Dec 7 at 17:22
















Can we take input as a string?
– lirtosiast
Dec 7 at 8:20




Can we take input as a string?
– lirtosiast
Dec 7 at 8:20












@lirtosiast, yes, but not list of digits.
– Vedant Kandoi
Dec 7 at 8:23




@lirtosiast, yes, but not list of digits.
– Vedant Kandoi
Dec 7 at 8:23




13




13




They could be called Autocannibalistic Numbers.
– Arnauld
Dec 7 at 10:20




They could be called Autocannibalistic Numbers.
– Arnauld
Dec 7 at 10:20




5




5




What is the reason we can't take as a list of digits? This problem already treats them as if they are lists of digits. Forcing them to be numbers means that you just have to pin extra code to convert them to a list.
– Post Left Garf Hunter
Dec 7 at 14:09




What is the reason we can't take as a list of digits? This problem already treats them as if they are lists of digits. Forcing them to be numbers means that you just have to pin extra code to convert them to a list.
– Post Left Garf Hunter
Dec 7 at 14:09




1




1




Can two consistent distinct values be returned instead of truthy/falsy?
– Olivier Grégoire
Dec 7 at 17:22




Can two consistent distinct values be returned instead of truthy/falsy?
– Olivier Grégoire
Dec 7 at 17:22










24 Answers
24






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote













JavaScript (ES6),  52 51  50 bytes



Saved 1 byte thanks to @tsh



Takes input as a string. Returns a Boolean value.





f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]


Try it online!



Commented



f = n =>                 // f = recursive function taking n (a string)
n > [n % 10] // The last digit is isolated with n % 10 and turned into a
// singleton array, which is eventually coerced to a string
// when the comparison occurs.
// So we do a lexicographical comparison between n and its
// last digit (e.g. '231'>'1' and '202'>'2', but '213'<'3').
? // If the above result is true:
f( // do a recursive call:
-(-n[0] - n) % 10 // We compute (int(first_digit) + int(n)) mod 10. There's no
// need to isolate the last digit since we do a mod 10 anyway.
+ n.slice(1, -1) // We add the middle part, as a string. It may be empty.
) // end of recursive call
: // else:
!n[1] // return true if n has only 1 digit, or false otherwise





share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]
    – tsh
    2 days ago




















up vote
6
down vote














Perl 6, 63 62 bytes





{!grep {.[*-1]>.[0]},(.comb,{.[0,*-1].sum%10,|.[1..*-2]}...1)}


Try it online!



Explanation:



{                                                            } # Anonymous code block
( ... ) # Create a sequence
.comb, # Starting with the input converted to a list of digits
{ } # With each element being
.[0,*-1] # The first and last element of the previous list
.sum%10 # Summed and modulo 10
,|.[1..*-2] # Followed by the intermediate elements
...1 # Until the list is length 1
!grep # Do none of the elements of the sequence
{.[*-1]>.[0]}, # Have the last element larger than the first?





share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    5
    down vote














    Java (JDK), 83 bytes





    n->{int r=0,h=n;while(h>9)h/=10;for(;n>9;h=(h+n)%10,n/=10)r=h<n%10?1:r;return r<1;}


    Try it online!



    Credits




    • -1 byte thanks to Kevin Cruijssen






    share|improve this answer























    • Given the length of the Python answers, I feel like I missed something... though the test cases are ok.
      – Olivier Grégoire
      Dec 7 at 12:22










    • I don't think you've missed anything. The Python answers both take the input as string and use indexing, and you take the input as integer and use /10 and %10 in a loop. So well done beating the Python answers; +1 from me. :)
      – Kevin Cruijssen
      Dec 7 at 12:34








    • 1




      You can golf a byte changing r+= to r= and ?1:0 to ?1:r.
      – Kevin Cruijssen
      Dec 7 at 12:37










    • @KevinCruijssen Indeed... the Python answers are suboptimal: golfs in comments are shorter than this answer. Also, thanks for the byte saved! ;-)
      – Olivier Grégoire
      Dec 7 at 12:42










    • You could return $0$ or $1$ by starting with r=1 and doing r&=h<n%10?0:r;return r; (saving 1 byte).
      – Arnauld
      Dec 7 at 16:01




















    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Mathematica, 62 bytes



    0(IntegerDigits@#//.{a_,r___,b_}/;a>=b:>{Mod[a+b,10],r})=={0}&


    First calls IntegerDigits on the input to get a list of its digits,
    then repeatedly applies the following rule:



    {a_,r___,b_}       (* match the first digit, 0 or more medial digits, and the last digit... *)
    /;a>=b (* under the condition that the number is edible... *)
    :>{Mod[a+b,10],r} (* and replace it with the next iteration *)


    The rule is applied until the pattern no longer matches,
    in which case either there is only one digit left (truthy)
    or the head is less than the tail (falsy).



    Instead of calling Length[__]==1,
    we can save a few bytes with 0(__)=={0},
    multiplying all elements in the list by 0
    and then comparing with the list {0}.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 1




      In case you didn't know, TIO has Mathematica now. Try it online!
      – Dennis
      Dec 7 at 15:36


















    up vote
    4
    down vote














    Jelly, 11 bytes



    Ṛṙ-µṖÄ%⁵:ḊẠ


    Try it online!



    How it works



    Ṛṙ-µṖÄ%⁵:ḊẠ  Main link. Argument: n

    Ṛ Reverse n, after casting it to a digit list.
    ṙ- Rotate the result -1 units to the left, i.e., 1 unit to the right.
    Let's call the resulting digit list D.
    µ Begin a new chain with argument D.
    Ṗ Pop; remove the last digit.
    Ä Accumulate; take the cumulative sum of the remaining digits.
    %⁵ Take the sums modulo 10.
    Ḋ Dequeue; yield D without its first digit.
    : Perform integer division between the results to both sides.
    Integer division is truthy iff greater-or-equal is truthy.
    Ạ All; return 1 if all quotients are truthy, 0 if not.





    share|improve this answer






























      up vote
      3
      down vote














      APL (Dyalog Unicode), 33 bytesSBCS



      Anonymous tacit prefix function taking a string as argument.



      {⊃⍵<t←⊃⌽⍵:0⋄3::1⋄∇10|t+@1⊢¯1↓⍵}⍎¨


      Try it online!



      ⍎¨ evaluate each character (this gives us a list of digits)



      {} apply the following "dfn" to that; is the argument (list of digits):



        ⌽⍵ reverse the argument



         pick the first element (this is the tail)



        t← assign to t (for tail)



        ⍵< for each of the original digits, see if it is less than that



         pick the first true/false



      : if so:



        0 return false



       then:



      3:: if from now on, an index error (out of bounds) happens:



        1 return true



        ¯1↓⍵ drop the last digit



         yield that (separates 1 and ¯1 so they won't form a single array)



        t+@1 add the tail to the first digit (the head)



        10| mod-10



         recurse



      Once we hit a single digit, ¯1↓ will make that an empty list, and @1 will cause an index error as there is no first digit, causing the function to return true.






      share|improve this answer






























        up vote
        3
        down vote














        Python 3, 77 bytes





        p,*s=map(int,input())
        print(all(n<=sum(s[i+1:],p)%10for i,n in enumerate(s)))


        Try it online!





        And my old solution with a recursive approach




        Python 3, 90 bytes





        f=lambda x,a=0:2>len(x)if 2>len(x)or(int(x[0])+a)%10<int(x[-1])else f(x[:-1],a+int(x[-1]))


        Try it online!



        Takes input as a string.






        share|improve this answer






























          up vote
          3
          down vote














          Python 3, 50 bytes



          First line stolen from Black Owl Kai's answer.





          p,*s=map(int,input())
          while s:*s,k=s;p%10<k>q;p+=k


          Try it online!



          Output is via exit code. Fails (1) for falsy inputs and finishes (0) for truthy inputs.






          share|improve this answer




























            up vote
            3
            down vote














            Python 2, 105 82 81 bytes





            i,x=map(int,input()),1
            for y in i[:0:-1]:
            if i[0]%10<y:x=0
            else:i[0]+=y
            print x


            Try it online!



            Many thanks for a massive -23 from @ØrjanJohansen



            Thanks to @VedantKandoi (and @ØrjanJohansen) for another -1






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1




              You can use for with a reverse slice, and also do the %10 only when testing: Try it online!
              – Ørjan Johansen
              Dec 7 at 10:59








            • 1




              Swap the if-else condition, if i[0]<i[-1]:x=0 and then else:..... @ØrjanJohansen, in your answer too.
              – Vedant Kandoi
              Dec 7 at 12:13










            • @ØrjanJohansen - Thanks. That's well cool.
              – ElPedro
              Dec 7 at 21:00










            • Hey @VedantKandoi. Sounds good but not sure exactly what you mean. You have me beaten on that one. Can you add a TIO please? When I try it works for all True cases but not for all of the False.
              – ElPedro
              Dec 7 at 21:15






            • 1




              I think @VedantKandoi means this.
              – Ørjan Johansen
              Dec 7 at 21:29




















            up vote
            2
            down vote














            Perl 5, 64 bytes





            {local$_=pop;1while s/(.)(.*)(.)/$1<$3?'':(($1+$3)%10).$2/e;/./}


            Try it online!






            share|improve this answer




























              up vote
              2
              down vote














              Python 2, 75 67 bytes





              l=lambda n:n==n[0]or n[-1]<=n[0]*l(`int(n[0]+n[-1],11)%10`+n[1:-1])


              Try it online!



              Recursive lambda approach. Takes input as a string. Many thanks to Dennis for saving 8 bytes!






              share|improve this answer






























                up vote
                2
                down vote














                Haskell, 69 64 bytes





                f n=read[show n!!0]#n
                h#n=n<10||h>=mod n 10&&mod(h+n)10#div n 10


                Try it online! Example usage: f 2632 yields True.



                Edit: -5 bytes because mod (h + mod n 10) 10 = mod (h + n) 10






                share|improve this answer























                • nice use of ||, which helped me to shorten my answer, too. Thanks!
                  – nimi
                  2 days ago


















                up vote
                2
                down vote













                Haskell, 70 64 60 bytes



                f(a:b)=b==""||a>=last b&&f(last(show$read[a]+read b):init b)


                Input is taken as a string.



                Try it online!



                Edit: -6 bytes by using @Laikoni's trick of using || instead of separate guards. Another -4 bytes thanks to @Laikoni.






                share|improve this answer



















                • 2




                  read[l b] can be just read b because you only look at the last digit anyway. Saves 4 more bytes by also in-lining last: Try it online!
                  – Laikoni
                  2 days ago


















                up vote
                2
                down vote














                Brachylog, 23 bytes



                ẹ{bkK&⟨h{≥₁+tg}t⟩,K↰|Ȯ}


                Try it online!



                This is a 1 byte save over Fatalize's solution.
                This uses a recursive approach instead of a iterative



                Explanation



                ẹ                          Input into a list of digits
                { } Assert that either
                bk | the list has at least 2 elements (see later)
                ⟨h{ }t⟩ | and that [head, tail]
                ≥₁ | | is increasing (head >= tail)
                + | | and their sum
                t | | mod 10 (take last digit)
                g | | as single element of a list
                , | concatenated with
                bkK K | the number without head and tail (this constrains the number to have at least 2 digits)
                ↰ | and that this constraint also works on the newly formed number
                |Ȯ | OR is a 1 digit number





                share|improve this answer




























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote














                  Retina 0.8.2, 42 bytes



                  d
                  $*#;
                  ^((#*).*;)2;$
                  $2$1
                  }`#{10}

                  ^#*;$


                  Try it online! Link include test cases. Explanation:



                  d
                  $*#;


                  Convert the digits to unary and insert separators.



                  ^((#*).*;)2;$
                  $2$1


                  If the last digit is not greater than the first then add them together.



                  #{10}


                  Reduce modulo 10 if appropriate.



                  }`


                  Repeat until the last digit is greater than the first or there is only one digit left.



                  ^#*;$


                  Test whether there is only one digit left.






                  share|improve this answer




























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote














                    05AB1E, 26 25 24 bytes



                    [DgD#ÁD2£D`›i0qëSOθs¦¦«


                    Can probably be golfed a bit more.. It feels overly long, but maybe the challenge is in terms of code more complex than I thought beforehand.



                    Try it online or verify all test cases.



                    Explanation:





                    [                 # Start an infinite loop
                    D # Duplicate the top of the stack
                    # (which is the input implicitly in the first iteration)
                    gD # Take its length and duplicate it
                    # # If its a single digit:
                    # Stop the infinite loop
                    # (and output the duplicated length of 1 (truthy) implicitly)
                    # Else:
                    # Discard the duplicate length
                    Á # Rotate the digits once towards the left
                    D2£ # Duplicate, and take the first two digits of the rotated number
                    D` # Duplicate, and push the digits loose to the stack
                    ›i # If the first digit is larger than the second digit:
                    0 # Push a 0 (falsey)
                    q # Stop the program (and output 0 implicitly)
                    ë # Else (first digit is smaller than or equal to the second digit):
                    SO # Sum the two digits
                    θ # Leave only the last digit of that sum
                    s # Swap to take the rotated number
                    ¦¦ # Remove the first two digits
                    « # Merge it together with the calculated new digit





                    share|improve this answer






























                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote














                      Brachylog, 24 bytes



                      ẹ;I⟨⟨h{≥₁+tg}t⟩c{bk}⟩ⁱ⁾Ȯ


                      Try it online!



                      I should change 's default behaviour so that it iterates an unknown number of times (currently, it iterates 1 time by default which is completely useless). I then wouldn't need the […];I[…]⁾, saving 3 bytes



                      Explanation



                      This program contains an ugly fork inside a fork. There is also some plumbing needed to work on lists of digits instead of numbers (because if we remove the head and tail of 76 we are left with 0, which doesn't work contrary to [7,6] where we end up with ).



                      ẹ                          Input into a list of digits
                      Ȯ While we don't have a single digit number…
                      ;I ⁱ⁾ …Iterate I times (I being unknown)…
                      ⟨ ⟩ …The following fork:
                      c | Concatenate…
                      ⟨ ⟩ | The output of the following fork:
                      h t | | Take the head H and tail T of the number
                      { } | | Then apply on [H,T]:
                      ≥₁ | | | H ≥ T
                      + | | | Sum them
                      tg | | | Take the last digit (i.e. mod 10) and wrap it in a list
                      { } | With the output of the following predicate:
                      bk | | Remove the head and the tail of the number





                      share|improve this answer





















                      • Using recursion instead of iteration and replacing the c-fork to use , instead i could remove 1 byte Try it online!
                        – Kroppeb
                        16 hours ago










                      • @Kroppeb Really cool. I think you should post your own answer, because it's significantly different than mine!
                        – Fatalize
                        16 hours ago




















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote














                      C++ (gcc), 144 bytes





                      bool f(std::string b){int c=b.length();while(c>1){if(b[0]<b[c-1])return 0;else{b[0]=(b[0]-48+b[c-1]-48)%10+48;b=b.substr(0,c-1);--c;}}return 1;}


                      Try it online!



                      First time I'm trying something like this so if I formatted something wrong please let me know. I'm not 100% sure on the rules for stuff like using namespace to eliminate the 5 bytes "std::" so I left it in.



                      Ungolfed:



                      bool hunger(std::string input)
                      {
                      int count=input.length();
                      while (count>1)
                      {
                      if (input[0]<input[count-1]) //if at any point the head cannot eat the tail we can quit the loop
                      //comparisons can be done without switching from ascii
                      {
                      return false;
                      }
                      else
                      {
                      input[0]=(input[0]-48+input[count-1]-48)%10+48; //eating operation has to occur on integers so subtract 48 to convert from ASCII to a number
                      input=input.substr(0,count-1); //get rid of the last number since it was eaten
                      --count;
                      }

                      }
                      return true; //if the end of the loop is reached the number has eaten itself
                      }





                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Ben H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                      • In theory you also need #include statements. However, I'd propose programming in the std lib facilities subdialect of C++ with #include "std_lib_facilities.h" prepended, which also does a using namespace std;. That header was written by the author of the language way back (lastest version is 2010) for students new to C++.
                        – Yakk
                        Dec 7 at 20:00












                      • @Yakk Unless you make and publish an interpreter that does this for you, you still need to counts the include of std_lib_facilities.h.
                        – Dennis
                        Dec 8 at 2:03










                      • @BenH Welcome to PPCG! You need the count all includes that are required to compile your function. The shortest method I know is #import<string>. Try it online!
                        – Dennis
                        Dec 8 at 2:08












                      • @Dennis #!/usr/bin/sh newline gcc -include "std_lib_facilities.h" $@ -- if I find a C++ course that provides that shell script, would that count?
                        – Yakk
                        Dec 8 at 2:19












                      • @Yakk Didn't know about that switch. Unlike #include statements, command-line arguments are free because they're essentially a new language. In C++(gcc) -include iostream, this is indeed 144 bytes.
                        – Dennis
                        Dec 8 at 2:26


















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      C#, 114 bytes



                      static bool L(string n){return n.Skip(1).Reverse().Select(x=>x%16).Aggregate(n[0]%16,(h,x)=>h>=x?(h+x)%10:-1)>=0;}


                      Try it online






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      gwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote














                        C (gcc) (with string.h), 110 108 bytes





                        c;f(char*b){c=strlen(b);if(!c)return 1;char*d=b+c-1;if(*b<*d)return 0;*b=(*b+*d-96)%10+48;*d=0;return f(b);}


                        Try it online!



                        Still relatively new to PPCG, so the correct syntax for linking libraries as a new language is foreign to me. Also note that the function returns 0 or 1 for false/true, and printing that result to stdout does require stdio. If we're being pedantic and the exercise requires output, the language requires stdio that as well.



                        Conceptually similar to @BenH's answer, but in C, so kudos where they are due (Welcome to PPCG, btw), but using recursion. It also uses array pointer arithmetic, because dirty code is shorter than clean code.



                        The function is tail recursive, with exit conditions if the first number can't eat the last or the length is 1, returning false or true, respectively. These values are found by dereferencing a pointer to the C-String (which gives a char) at the beginning and end of the string, and doing the comparisons on them. pointer arithmetic is done to find the end of the string. finally, the last char is "erased" by replacing it with a null terminator (0).



                        It's possible that the modulus arithmetic could be shortened by a byte or two, but I already need a shower after that pointer manipulation.



                        Ungolfed Version Here



                        Update: Saved two bytes by replacing c==1 with !c. This is essentially c == 0. It will run an additional time, and will needlessly double itself before deleting itself, but saves two bytes. A side effect is null or zero length strings won't cause infinite recursion (though we shouldn't get null strings as the exercise says positive integers).






                        share|improve this answer























                        • You do not need to link libraries in the case of gcc - although warnings will be generated, gcc will happily compile your code without #includes. Also, you could save 4 bytes with -DR=return. Finally, in your test code, the s are unnecessary, as the string literally already include them implicitly.
                          – Rogem
                          2 days ago








                        • 1




                          Furthermore, you can return from a function by assigning to the first variable: b=case1?res1:case2?res2:res_else; is the same as if(case1)return res1;if(case2)return res2;return res_else;
                          – Rogem
                          2 days ago










                        • Even further, you can shed some extra bytes by not using c: you can determine if the string is zero-length from head-tail.
                          – Rogem
                          2 days ago










                        • 77 bytes
                          – Rogem
                          2 days ago










                        • Didn't realize you could use ternary (conditional) operators in C. Has that always been the case? Regardless, good to know; I'll be using them in the future. Cheers
                          – Andrew Baumher
                          2 days ago


















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Powershell, 89 bytes





                        "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)'-or(($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3-and(.g(''+(+$m.1+$m.3)%10+$m.2)))


                        Important! The script calls itself recursively. So save the script as g.ps1 file in the current directory. Also you can call a script block variable instead script file (see the test script below). That calls has same length.



                        Note 1: The script uses a lazy evaluation of logic operators -or and -and. If "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)' is True then the right subexpression of -or is not evaluated. Also if ($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3 is False then the right subexpression of -and is not evaluated too. So we avoid infinite recursion.



                        Note 2: The regular expression '(.)(.*)(.)' does not contain start and end anchors because the expression (.*) is greedy by default.



                        Test script



                        $g={
                        "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)'-or(($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3-and(&$g(''+(+$m.1+$m.3)%10+$m.2)))
                        }

                        @(
                        ,(2632, $true)
                        ,(92258, $true)
                        ,(60282, $true)
                        ,(38410, $true)
                        ,(3210, $true)
                        ,(2302, $true)
                        ,(2742, $true)
                        ,(8628, $true)
                        ,(6793, $true)
                        ,(1, $true)
                        ,(2, $true)
                        ,(10, $true)
                        ,(100, $true)
                        ,(55, $true)
                        ,(121, $true)
                        ,(6724, $false)
                        ,(47, $false)
                        ,(472, $false)
                        ,(60247, $false)
                        ,(33265, $false)
                        ,(79350, $false)
                        ,(83147, $false)
                        ,(93101, $false)
                        ,(57088, $false)
                        ,(69513, $false)
                        ,(62738, $false)
                        ,(54754, $false)
                        ,(23931, $false)
                        ,(7164, $false)
                        ,(5289, $false)
                        ,(3435, $false)
                        ,(3949, $false)
                        ,(8630, $false)
                        ,(5018, $false)
                        ,(6715, $false)
                        ,(340, $false)
                        ,(2194, $false)
                        ) | %{
                        $n,$expected = $_
                        #$result = .g $n # uncomment this line to call a script file g.ps1
                        $result = &$g $n # uncomment this line to call a script block variable $g
                        # the script block call and the script file call has same length
                        "$($result-eq-$expected): $result <- $n"
                        }


                        Output:



                        True: True <- 2632
                        True: True <- 92258
                        True: True <- 60282
                        True: True <- 38410
                        True: True <- 3210
                        True: True <- 2302
                        True: True <- 2742
                        True: True <- 8628
                        True: True <- 6793
                        True: True <- 1
                        True: True <- 2
                        True: True <- 10
                        True: True <- 100
                        True: True <- 55
                        True: True <- 121
                        True: False <- 6724
                        True: False <- 47
                        True: False <- 472
                        True: False <- 60247
                        True: False <- 33265
                        True: False <- 79350
                        True: False <- 83147
                        True: False <- 93101
                        True: False <- 57088
                        True: False <- 69513
                        True: False <- 62738
                        True: False <- 54754
                        True: False <- 23931
                        True: False <- 7164
                        True: False <- 5289
                        True: False <- 3435
                        True: False <- 3949
                        True: False <- 8630
                        True: False <- 5018
                        True: False <- 6715
                        True: False <- 340
                        True: False <- 2194




                        Powershell, 90 bytes



                        No recursion. No file name dependency and no script block name dependency.



                        for($s="$args";$s[1]-and$s-ge$s%10){$s=''+(2+$s[0]+$s)%10+($s|% S*g 1($s.Length-2))}!$s[1]


                        A Powershell implicitly converts a right operand to a type of a left operand. Therefore, $s-ge$s%10 calculates right operand $s%10 as integer and compare it as a string because type of the left operand is string. And 2+$s[0]+$s converts a char $s[0] and string $s to integer because left operand 2 is integer.



                        $s|% S*g 1($s.Length-2) is a shortcut to $s.Substring(1,($s.Length-2))






                        share|improve this answer






























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote














                          C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 69 bytes





                          x=>{for(int h=x[0],i=x.Length;i>1;)h=h<x[--i]?h/0:48+(h+x[i]-96)%10;}


                          Try it online!



                          Success or failure is determined by presence or absence of an exception. Input is in the form of a string.



                          Less golfed...



                          // x is the input as a string
                          x=>{
                          // h is the head
                          for(int h=x[0],
                          // i is an index to the tail
                          i=x.Length;
                          // continue until the tail is at 0
                          i>1;)
                          // is head smaller larger than tail?
                          h=h<x[--i]
                          // throw an exception
                          ?h/0
                          // calculate the next head
                          :48+(h+x[i]-96)%10;
                          }


                          There are a couple extra bytes to deal with converting between characters and digits, but overall that didn't affect the size too much.






                          share|improve this answer






























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote














                            PowerShell, 94 91 bytes





                            for(;$n-and$n[0]-ge$n[-1]){$n=$n-replace"^.",((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)-replace".$"}return !$n


                            Try it online!





                            Test Script



                            function f($n){

                            for(;$n-and$n[0]-ge$n[-1]){$n=$n-replace"^.",((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)-replace".$"}return !$n

                            Remove-Variable n
                            }
                            Write-Host True values:
                            @(2632, 92258, 60282, 38410,3210, 2302, 2742, 8628, 6793, 1, 2, 10, 100, 55, 121) |
                            % { Write-Host " $_ $(' '*(6-$_.ToString().Length)) $(f $_.ToString())" }

                            Write-Host False values:
                            @(6724, 47, 472, 60247, 33265, 79350, 83147, 93101, 57088, 69513, 62738, 54754, 23931, 7164, 5289, 3435, 3949, 8630, 5018, 6715, 340, 2194) |
                            % { Write-Host " $_ $(' '*(6-$_.ToString().Length)) $(f $_.ToString())" }


                            Ungolfed code:



                            function f ($inVar){
                            # While the Input exists, and the first character is greater than last
                            while($inVar -and ($inVar[0] -ge $inVar[-1])){

                            # Calculate the first integer -> ((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)
                            $summationChars = [int]$inVar[0]+ [int]$inVar[-1]
                            # $summationChars adds the ascii values, not the integer literals.
                            $summationResult = $summationChars - 48*2
                            $summationModulo = $summationResult % 10

                            # Replace first character with the modulo
                            $inVar = $inVar -replace "^.", $summationModulo

                            # Remove last character
                            $inVar = $inVar -replace ".$"
                            }
                            # Either it doesn't exist (Returns $True), or
                            # it exists since $inVar[0] < $inVar[-1] returning $False
                            return !$inVar
                            }





                            share|improve this answer



















                            • 1




                              You shouldn't need to check $n[0] in your for statement -- just checking $n should be enough.
                              – AdmBorkBork
                              Dec 7 at 19:16










                            • You could to use -6 instead -96 because it is enough to calc %10
                              – mazzy
                              2 days ago










                            • you could remove return and save 7 bytes
                              – mazzy
                              2 days ago










                            • and I think you should include a parameter declaration to the bytes count. either param($n) or function f($n).
                              – mazzy
                              2 days ago






                            • 1




                              @mazzy The poster stated in the comments that you were allowed to use strings, you just weren't allowed to give the input as a list of numbers/strings. I interpreted this as ["1","2","3"] isn't valid input but "123"is. if @VedantKandoi has an issue with it I can definitely change it!
                              – KGlasier
                              15 hours ago


















                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote














                            Perl 5 -pF, 53 bytes





                            $F[0]=($F[0]+pop@F)%10while$#F&&$F[0]>=$F[-1];$_=!$#F


                            Try it online!






                            share|improve this answer





















                              Your Answer





                              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
                              });
                              });
                              }, "mathjax-editing");

                              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
                              StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
                              StackExchange.snippets.init();
                              });
                              });
                              }, "code-snippets");

                              StackExchange.ready(function() {
                              var channelOptions = {
                              tags: "".split(" "),
                              id: "200"
                              };
                              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                              createEditor();
                              });
                              }
                              else {
                              createEditor();
                              }
                              });

                              function createEditor() {
                              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                              heartbeatType: 'answer',
                              convertImagesToLinks: false,
                              noModals: true,
                              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                              reputationToPostImages: null,
                              bindNavPrevention: true,
                              postfix: "",
                              imageUploader: {
                              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                              allowUrls: true
                              },
                              onDemand: true,
                              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                              });


                              }
                              });














                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f177118%2fnumber-that-can-eat-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown

























                              24 Answers
                              24






                              active

                              oldest

                              votes








                              24 Answers
                              24






                              active

                              oldest

                              votes









                              active

                              oldest

                              votes






                              active

                              oldest

                              votes








                              up vote
                              7
                              down vote













                              JavaScript (ES6),  52 51  50 bytes



                              Saved 1 byte thanks to @tsh



                              Takes input as a string. Returns a Boolean value.





                              f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]


                              Try it online!



                              Commented



                              f = n =>                 // f = recursive function taking n (a string)
                              n > [n % 10] // The last digit is isolated with n % 10 and turned into a
                              // singleton array, which is eventually coerced to a string
                              // when the comparison occurs.
                              // So we do a lexicographical comparison between n and its
                              // last digit (e.g. '231'>'1' and '202'>'2', but '213'<'3').
                              ? // If the above result is true:
                              f( // do a recursive call:
                              -(-n[0] - n) % 10 // We compute (int(first_digit) + int(n)) mod 10. There's no
                              // need to isolate the last digit since we do a mod 10 anyway.
                              + n.slice(1, -1) // We add the middle part, as a string. It may be empty.
                              ) // end of recursive call
                              : // else:
                              !n[1] // return true if n has only 1 digit, or false otherwise





                              share|improve this answer



















                              • 1




                                f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]
                                – tsh
                                2 days ago

















                              up vote
                              7
                              down vote













                              JavaScript (ES6),  52 51  50 bytes



                              Saved 1 byte thanks to @tsh



                              Takes input as a string. Returns a Boolean value.





                              f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]


                              Try it online!



                              Commented



                              f = n =>                 // f = recursive function taking n (a string)
                              n > [n % 10] // The last digit is isolated with n % 10 and turned into a
                              // singleton array, which is eventually coerced to a string
                              // when the comparison occurs.
                              // So we do a lexicographical comparison between n and its
                              // last digit (e.g. '231'>'1' and '202'>'2', but '213'<'3').
                              ? // If the above result is true:
                              f( // do a recursive call:
                              -(-n[0] - n) % 10 // We compute (int(first_digit) + int(n)) mod 10. There's no
                              // need to isolate the last digit since we do a mod 10 anyway.
                              + n.slice(1, -1) // We add the middle part, as a string. It may be empty.
                              ) // end of recursive call
                              : // else:
                              !n[1] // return true if n has only 1 digit, or false otherwise





                              share|improve this answer



















                              • 1




                                f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]
                                – tsh
                                2 days ago















                              up vote
                              7
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              7
                              down vote









                              JavaScript (ES6),  52 51  50 bytes



                              Saved 1 byte thanks to @tsh



                              Takes input as a string. Returns a Boolean value.





                              f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]


                              Try it online!



                              Commented



                              f = n =>                 // f = recursive function taking n (a string)
                              n > [n % 10] // The last digit is isolated with n % 10 and turned into a
                              // singleton array, which is eventually coerced to a string
                              // when the comparison occurs.
                              // So we do a lexicographical comparison between n and its
                              // last digit (e.g. '231'>'1' and '202'>'2', but '213'<'3').
                              ? // If the above result is true:
                              f( // do a recursive call:
                              -(-n[0] - n) % 10 // We compute (int(first_digit) + int(n)) mod 10. There's no
                              // need to isolate the last digit since we do a mod 10 anyway.
                              + n.slice(1, -1) // We add the middle part, as a string. It may be empty.
                              ) // end of recursive call
                              : // else:
                              !n[1] // return true if n has only 1 digit, or false otherwise





                              share|improve this answer














                              JavaScript (ES6),  52 51  50 bytes



                              Saved 1 byte thanks to @tsh



                              Takes input as a string. Returns a Boolean value.





                              f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]


                              Try it online!



                              Commented



                              f = n =>                 // f = recursive function taking n (a string)
                              n > [n % 10] // The last digit is isolated with n % 10 and turned into a
                              // singleton array, which is eventually coerced to a string
                              // when the comparison occurs.
                              // So we do a lexicographical comparison between n and its
                              // last digit (e.g. '231'>'1' and '202'>'2', but '213'<'3').
                              ? // If the above result is true:
                              f( // do a recursive call:
                              -(-n[0] - n) % 10 // We compute (int(first_digit) + int(n)) mod 10. There's no
                              // need to isolate the last digit since we do a mod 10 anyway.
                              + n.slice(1, -1) // We add the middle part, as a string. It may be empty.
                              ) // end of recursive call
                              : // else:
                              !n[1] // return true if n has only 1 digit, or false otherwise






                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited 2 days ago

























                              answered Dec 7 at 9:43









                              Arnauld

                              70.9k688298




                              70.9k688298








                              • 1




                                f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]
                                – tsh
                                2 days ago
















                              • 1




                                f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]
                                – tsh
                                2 days ago










                              1




                              1




                              f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]
                              – tsh
                              2 days ago






                              f=n=>n>[n%10]?f(-(-n[0]-n)%10+n.slice(1,-1)):!n[1]
                              – tsh
                              2 days ago












                              up vote
                              6
                              down vote














                              Perl 6, 63 62 bytes





                              {!grep {.[*-1]>.[0]},(.comb,{.[0,*-1].sum%10,|.[1..*-2]}...1)}


                              Try it online!



                              Explanation:



                              {                                                            } # Anonymous code block
                              ( ... ) # Create a sequence
                              .comb, # Starting with the input converted to a list of digits
                              { } # With each element being
                              .[0,*-1] # The first and last element of the previous list
                              .sum%10 # Summed and modulo 10
                              ,|.[1..*-2] # Followed by the intermediate elements
                              ...1 # Until the list is length 1
                              !grep # Do none of the elements of the sequence
                              {.[*-1]>.[0]}, # Have the last element larger than the first?





                              share|improve this answer



























                                up vote
                                6
                                down vote














                                Perl 6, 63 62 bytes





                                {!grep {.[*-1]>.[0]},(.comb,{.[0,*-1].sum%10,|.[1..*-2]}...1)}


                                Try it online!



                                Explanation:



                                {                                                            } # Anonymous code block
                                ( ... ) # Create a sequence
                                .comb, # Starting with the input converted to a list of digits
                                { } # With each element being
                                .[0,*-1] # The first and last element of the previous list
                                .sum%10 # Summed and modulo 10
                                ,|.[1..*-2] # Followed by the intermediate elements
                                ...1 # Until the list is length 1
                                !grep # Do none of the elements of the sequence
                                {.[*-1]>.[0]}, # Have the last element larger than the first?





                                share|improve this answer

























                                  up vote
                                  6
                                  down vote










                                  up vote
                                  6
                                  down vote










                                  Perl 6, 63 62 bytes





                                  {!grep {.[*-1]>.[0]},(.comb,{.[0,*-1].sum%10,|.[1..*-2]}...1)}


                                  Try it online!



                                  Explanation:



                                  {                                                            } # Anonymous code block
                                  ( ... ) # Create a sequence
                                  .comb, # Starting with the input converted to a list of digits
                                  { } # With each element being
                                  .[0,*-1] # The first and last element of the previous list
                                  .sum%10 # Summed and modulo 10
                                  ,|.[1..*-2] # Followed by the intermediate elements
                                  ...1 # Until the list is length 1
                                  !grep # Do none of the elements of the sequence
                                  {.[*-1]>.[0]}, # Have the last element larger than the first?





                                  share|improve this answer















                                  Perl 6, 63 62 bytes





                                  {!grep {.[*-1]>.[0]},(.comb,{.[0,*-1].sum%10,|.[1..*-2]}...1)}


                                  Try it online!



                                  Explanation:



                                  {                                                            } # Anonymous code block
                                  ( ... ) # Create a sequence
                                  .comb, # Starting with the input converted to a list of digits
                                  { } # With each element being
                                  .[0,*-1] # The first and last element of the previous list
                                  .sum%10 # Summed and modulo 10
                                  ,|.[1..*-2] # Followed by the intermediate elements
                                  ...1 # Until the list is length 1
                                  !grep # Do none of the elements of the sequence
                                  {.[*-1]>.[0]}, # Have the last element larger than the first?






                                  share|improve this answer














                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer








                                  edited Dec 7 at 23:02

























                                  answered Dec 7 at 8:32









                                  Jo King

                                  20.1k245106




                                  20.1k245106






















                                      up vote
                                      5
                                      down vote














                                      Java (JDK), 83 bytes





                                      n->{int r=0,h=n;while(h>9)h/=10;for(;n>9;h=(h+n)%10,n/=10)r=h<n%10?1:r;return r<1;}


                                      Try it online!



                                      Credits




                                      • -1 byte thanks to Kevin Cruijssen






                                      share|improve this answer























                                      • Given the length of the Python answers, I feel like I missed something... though the test cases are ok.
                                        – Olivier Grégoire
                                        Dec 7 at 12:22










                                      • I don't think you've missed anything. The Python answers both take the input as string and use indexing, and you take the input as integer and use /10 and %10 in a loop. So well done beating the Python answers; +1 from me. :)
                                        – Kevin Cruijssen
                                        Dec 7 at 12:34








                                      • 1




                                        You can golf a byte changing r+= to r= and ?1:0 to ?1:r.
                                        – Kevin Cruijssen
                                        Dec 7 at 12:37










                                      • @KevinCruijssen Indeed... the Python answers are suboptimal: golfs in comments are shorter than this answer. Also, thanks for the byte saved! ;-)
                                        – Olivier Grégoire
                                        Dec 7 at 12:42










                                      • You could return $0$ or $1$ by starting with r=1 and doing r&=h<n%10?0:r;return r; (saving 1 byte).
                                        – Arnauld
                                        Dec 7 at 16:01

















                                      up vote
                                      5
                                      down vote














                                      Java (JDK), 83 bytes





                                      n->{int r=0,h=n;while(h>9)h/=10;for(;n>9;h=(h+n)%10,n/=10)r=h<n%10?1:r;return r<1;}


                                      Try it online!



                                      Credits




                                      • -1 byte thanks to Kevin Cruijssen






                                      share|improve this answer























                                      • Given the length of the Python answers, I feel like I missed something... though the test cases are ok.
                                        – Olivier Grégoire
                                        Dec 7 at 12:22










                                      • I don't think you've missed anything. The Python answers both take the input as string and use indexing, and you take the input as integer and use /10 and %10 in a loop. So well done beating the Python answers; +1 from me. :)
                                        – Kevin Cruijssen
                                        Dec 7 at 12:34








                                      • 1




                                        You can golf a byte changing r+= to r= and ?1:0 to ?1:r.
                                        – Kevin Cruijssen
                                        Dec 7 at 12:37










                                      • @KevinCruijssen Indeed... the Python answers are suboptimal: golfs in comments are shorter than this answer. Also, thanks for the byte saved! ;-)
                                        – Olivier Grégoire
                                        Dec 7 at 12:42










                                      • You could return $0$ or $1$ by starting with r=1 and doing r&=h<n%10?0:r;return r; (saving 1 byte).
                                        – Arnauld
                                        Dec 7 at 16:01















                                      up vote
                                      5
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      5
                                      down vote










                                      Java (JDK), 83 bytes





                                      n->{int r=0,h=n;while(h>9)h/=10;for(;n>9;h=(h+n)%10,n/=10)r=h<n%10?1:r;return r<1;}


                                      Try it online!



                                      Credits




                                      • -1 byte thanks to Kevin Cruijssen






                                      share|improve this answer















                                      Java (JDK), 83 bytes





                                      n->{int r=0,h=n;while(h>9)h/=10;for(;n>9;h=(h+n)%10,n/=10)r=h<n%10?1:r;return r<1;}


                                      Try it online!



                                      Credits




                                      • -1 byte thanks to Kevin Cruijssen







                                      share|improve this answer














                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited Dec 7 at 12:40

























                                      answered Dec 7 at 12:16









                                      Olivier Grégoire

                                      8,55711843




                                      8,55711843












                                      • Given the length of the Python answers, I feel like I missed something... though the test cases are ok.
                                        – Olivier Grégoire
                                        Dec 7 at 12:22










                                      • I don't think you've missed anything. The Python answers both take the input as string and use indexing, and you take the input as integer and use /10 and %10 in a loop. So well done beating the Python answers; +1 from me. :)
                                        – Kevin Cruijssen
                                        Dec 7 at 12:34








                                      • 1




                                        You can golf a byte changing r+= to r= and ?1:0 to ?1:r.
                                        – Kevin Cruijssen
                                        Dec 7 at 12:37










                                      • @KevinCruijssen Indeed... the Python answers are suboptimal: golfs in comments are shorter than this answer. Also, thanks for the byte saved! ;-)
                                        – Olivier Grégoire
                                        Dec 7 at 12:42










                                      • You could return $0$ or $1$ by starting with r=1 and doing r&=h<n%10?0:r;return r; (saving 1 byte).
                                        – Arnauld
                                        Dec 7 at 16:01




















                                      • Given the length of the Python answers, I feel like I missed something... though the test cases are ok.
                                        – Olivier Grégoire
                                        Dec 7 at 12:22










                                      • I don't think you've missed anything. The Python answers both take the input as string and use indexing, and you take the input as integer and use /10 and %10 in a loop. So well done beating the Python answers; +1 from me. :)
                                        – Kevin Cruijssen
                                        Dec 7 at 12:34








                                      • 1




                                        You can golf a byte changing r+= to r= and ?1:0 to ?1:r.
                                        – Kevin Cruijssen
                                        Dec 7 at 12:37










                                      • @KevinCruijssen Indeed... the Python answers are suboptimal: golfs in comments are shorter than this answer. Also, thanks for the byte saved! ;-)
                                        – Olivier Grégoire
                                        Dec 7 at 12:42










                                      • You could return $0$ or $1$ by starting with r=1 and doing r&=h<n%10?0:r;return r; (saving 1 byte).
                                        – Arnauld
                                        Dec 7 at 16:01


















                                      Given the length of the Python answers, I feel like I missed something... though the test cases are ok.
                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                      Dec 7 at 12:22




                                      Given the length of the Python answers, I feel like I missed something... though the test cases are ok.
                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                      Dec 7 at 12:22












                                      I don't think you've missed anything. The Python answers both take the input as string and use indexing, and you take the input as integer and use /10 and %10 in a loop. So well done beating the Python answers; +1 from me. :)
                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                      Dec 7 at 12:34






                                      I don't think you've missed anything. The Python answers both take the input as string and use indexing, and you take the input as integer and use /10 and %10 in a loop. So well done beating the Python answers; +1 from me. :)
                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                      Dec 7 at 12:34






                                      1




                                      1




                                      You can golf a byte changing r+= to r= and ?1:0 to ?1:r.
                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                      Dec 7 at 12:37




                                      You can golf a byte changing r+= to r= and ?1:0 to ?1:r.
                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                      Dec 7 at 12:37












                                      @KevinCruijssen Indeed... the Python answers are suboptimal: golfs in comments are shorter than this answer. Also, thanks for the byte saved! ;-)
                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                      Dec 7 at 12:42




                                      @KevinCruijssen Indeed... the Python answers are suboptimal: golfs in comments are shorter than this answer. Also, thanks for the byte saved! ;-)
                                      – Olivier Grégoire
                                      Dec 7 at 12:42












                                      You could return $0$ or $1$ by starting with r=1 and doing r&=h<n%10?0:r;return r; (saving 1 byte).
                                      – Arnauld
                                      Dec 7 at 16:01






                                      You could return $0$ or $1$ by starting with r=1 and doing r&=h<n%10?0:r;return r; (saving 1 byte).
                                      – Arnauld
                                      Dec 7 at 16:01












                                      up vote
                                      4
                                      down vote













                                      Mathematica, 62 bytes



                                      0(IntegerDigits@#//.{a_,r___,b_}/;a>=b:>{Mod[a+b,10],r})=={0}&


                                      First calls IntegerDigits on the input to get a list of its digits,
                                      then repeatedly applies the following rule:



                                      {a_,r___,b_}       (* match the first digit, 0 or more medial digits, and the last digit... *)
                                      /;a>=b (* under the condition that the number is edible... *)
                                      :>{Mod[a+b,10],r} (* and replace it with the next iteration *)


                                      The rule is applied until the pattern no longer matches,
                                      in which case either there is only one digit left (truthy)
                                      or the head is less than the tail (falsy).



                                      Instead of calling Length[__]==1,
                                      we can save a few bytes with 0(__)=={0},
                                      multiplying all elements in the list by 0
                                      and then comparing with the list {0}.






                                      share|improve this answer

















                                      • 1




                                        In case you didn't know, TIO has Mathematica now. Try it online!
                                        – Dennis
                                        Dec 7 at 15:36















                                      up vote
                                      4
                                      down vote













                                      Mathematica, 62 bytes



                                      0(IntegerDigits@#//.{a_,r___,b_}/;a>=b:>{Mod[a+b,10],r})=={0}&


                                      First calls IntegerDigits on the input to get a list of its digits,
                                      then repeatedly applies the following rule:



                                      {a_,r___,b_}       (* match the first digit, 0 or more medial digits, and the last digit... *)
                                      /;a>=b (* under the condition that the number is edible... *)
                                      :>{Mod[a+b,10],r} (* and replace it with the next iteration *)


                                      The rule is applied until the pattern no longer matches,
                                      in which case either there is only one digit left (truthy)
                                      or the head is less than the tail (falsy).



                                      Instead of calling Length[__]==1,
                                      we can save a few bytes with 0(__)=={0},
                                      multiplying all elements in the list by 0
                                      and then comparing with the list {0}.






                                      share|improve this answer

















                                      • 1




                                        In case you didn't know, TIO has Mathematica now. Try it online!
                                        – Dennis
                                        Dec 7 at 15:36













                                      up vote
                                      4
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      4
                                      down vote









                                      Mathematica, 62 bytes



                                      0(IntegerDigits@#//.{a_,r___,b_}/;a>=b:>{Mod[a+b,10],r})=={0}&


                                      First calls IntegerDigits on the input to get a list of its digits,
                                      then repeatedly applies the following rule:



                                      {a_,r___,b_}       (* match the first digit, 0 or more medial digits, and the last digit... *)
                                      /;a>=b (* under the condition that the number is edible... *)
                                      :>{Mod[a+b,10],r} (* and replace it with the next iteration *)


                                      The rule is applied until the pattern no longer matches,
                                      in which case either there is only one digit left (truthy)
                                      or the head is less than the tail (falsy).



                                      Instead of calling Length[__]==1,
                                      we can save a few bytes with 0(__)=={0},
                                      multiplying all elements in the list by 0
                                      and then comparing with the list {0}.






                                      share|improve this answer












                                      Mathematica, 62 bytes



                                      0(IntegerDigits@#//.{a_,r___,b_}/;a>=b:>{Mod[a+b,10],r})=={0}&


                                      First calls IntegerDigits on the input to get a list of its digits,
                                      then repeatedly applies the following rule:



                                      {a_,r___,b_}       (* match the first digit, 0 or more medial digits, and the last digit... *)
                                      /;a>=b (* under the condition that the number is edible... *)
                                      :>{Mod[a+b,10],r} (* and replace it with the next iteration *)


                                      The rule is applied until the pattern no longer matches,
                                      in which case either there is only one digit left (truthy)
                                      or the head is less than the tail (falsy).



                                      Instead of calling Length[__]==1,
                                      we can save a few bytes with 0(__)=={0},
                                      multiplying all elements in the list by 0
                                      and then comparing with the list {0}.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Dec 7 at 8:19









                                      Doorknob

                                      53.9k17112342




                                      53.9k17112342








                                      • 1




                                        In case you didn't know, TIO has Mathematica now. Try it online!
                                        – Dennis
                                        Dec 7 at 15:36














                                      • 1




                                        In case you didn't know, TIO has Mathematica now. Try it online!
                                        – Dennis
                                        Dec 7 at 15:36








                                      1




                                      1




                                      In case you didn't know, TIO has Mathematica now. Try it online!
                                      – Dennis
                                      Dec 7 at 15:36




                                      In case you didn't know, TIO has Mathematica now. Try it online!
                                      – Dennis
                                      Dec 7 at 15:36










                                      up vote
                                      4
                                      down vote














                                      Jelly, 11 bytes



                                      Ṛṙ-µṖÄ%⁵:ḊẠ


                                      Try it online!



                                      How it works



                                      Ṛṙ-µṖÄ%⁵:ḊẠ  Main link. Argument: n

                                      Ṛ Reverse n, after casting it to a digit list.
                                      ṙ- Rotate the result -1 units to the left, i.e., 1 unit to the right.
                                      Let's call the resulting digit list D.
                                      µ Begin a new chain with argument D.
                                      Ṗ Pop; remove the last digit.
                                      Ä Accumulate; take the cumulative sum of the remaining digits.
                                      %⁵ Take the sums modulo 10.
                                      Ḋ Dequeue; yield D without its first digit.
                                      : Perform integer division between the results to both sides.
                                      Integer division is truthy iff greater-or-equal is truthy.
                                      Ạ All; return 1 if all quotients are truthy, 0 if not.





                                      share|improve this answer



























                                        up vote
                                        4
                                        down vote














                                        Jelly, 11 bytes



                                        Ṛṙ-µṖÄ%⁵:ḊẠ


                                        Try it online!



                                        How it works



                                        Ṛṙ-µṖÄ%⁵:ḊẠ  Main link. Argument: n

                                        Ṛ Reverse n, after casting it to a digit list.
                                        ṙ- Rotate the result -1 units to the left, i.e., 1 unit to the right.
                                        Let's call the resulting digit list D.
                                        µ Begin a new chain with argument D.
                                        Ṗ Pop; remove the last digit.
                                        Ä Accumulate; take the cumulative sum of the remaining digits.
                                        %⁵ Take the sums modulo 10.
                                        Ḋ Dequeue; yield D without its first digit.
                                        : Perform integer division between the results to both sides.
                                        Integer division is truthy iff greater-or-equal is truthy.
                                        Ạ All; return 1 if all quotients are truthy, 0 if not.





                                        share|improve this answer

























                                          up vote
                                          4
                                          down vote










                                          up vote
                                          4
                                          down vote










                                          Jelly, 11 bytes



                                          Ṛṙ-µṖÄ%⁵:ḊẠ


                                          Try it online!



                                          How it works



                                          Ṛṙ-µṖÄ%⁵:ḊẠ  Main link. Argument: n

                                          Ṛ Reverse n, after casting it to a digit list.
                                          ṙ- Rotate the result -1 units to the left, i.e., 1 unit to the right.
                                          Let's call the resulting digit list D.
                                          µ Begin a new chain with argument D.
                                          Ṗ Pop; remove the last digit.
                                          Ä Accumulate; take the cumulative sum of the remaining digits.
                                          %⁵ Take the sums modulo 10.
                                          Ḋ Dequeue; yield D without its first digit.
                                          : Perform integer division between the results to both sides.
                                          Integer division is truthy iff greater-or-equal is truthy.
                                          Ạ All; return 1 if all quotients are truthy, 0 if not.





                                          share|improve this answer















                                          Jelly, 11 bytes



                                          Ṛṙ-µṖÄ%⁵:ḊẠ


                                          Try it online!



                                          How it works



                                          Ṛṙ-µṖÄ%⁵:ḊẠ  Main link. Argument: n

                                          Ṛ Reverse n, after casting it to a digit list.
                                          ṙ- Rotate the result -1 units to the left, i.e., 1 unit to the right.
                                          Let's call the resulting digit list D.
                                          µ Begin a new chain with argument D.
                                          Ṗ Pop; remove the last digit.
                                          Ä Accumulate; take the cumulative sum of the remaining digits.
                                          %⁵ Take the sums modulo 10.
                                          Ḋ Dequeue; yield D without its first digit.
                                          : Perform integer division between the results to both sides.
                                          Integer division is truthy iff greater-or-equal is truthy.
                                          Ạ All; return 1 if all quotients are truthy, 0 if not.






                                          share|improve this answer














                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer








                                          edited Dec 7 at 15:55

























                                          answered Dec 7 at 14:09









                                          Dennis

                                          185k32295734




                                          185k32295734






















                                              up vote
                                              3
                                              down vote














                                              APL (Dyalog Unicode), 33 bytesSBCS



                                              Anonymous tacit prefix function taking a string as argument.



                                              {⊃⍵<t←⊃⌽⍵:0⋄3::1⋄∇10|t+@1⊢¯1↓⍵}⍎¨


                                              Try it online!



                                              ⍎¨ evaluate each character (this gives us a list of digits)



                                              {} apply the following "dfn" to that; is the argument (list of digits):



                                                ⌽⍵ reverse the argument



                                                 pick the first element (this is the tail)



                                                t← assign to t (for tail)



                                                ⍵< for each of the original digits, see if it is less than that



                                                 pick the first true/false



                                              : if so:



                                                0 return false



                                               then:



                                              3:: if from now on, an index error (out of bounds) happens:



                                                1 return true



                                                ¯1↓⍵ drop the last digit



                                                 yield that (separates 1 and ¯1 so they won't form a single array)



                                                t+@1 add the tail to the first digit (the head)



                                                10| mod-10



                                                 recurse



                                              Once we hit a single digit, ¯1↓ will make that an empty list, and @1 will cause an index error as there is no first digit, causing the function to return true.






                                              share|improve this answer



























                                                up vote
                                                3
                                                down vote














                                                APL (Dyalog Unicode), 33 bytesSBCS



                                                Anonymous tacit prefix function taking a string as argument.



                                                {⊃⍵<t←⊃⌽⍵:0⋄3::1⋄∇10|t+@1⊢¯1↓⍵}⍎¨


                                                Try it online!



                                                ⍎¨ evaluate each character (this gives us a list of digits)



                                                {} apply the following "dfn" to that; is the argument (list of digits):



                                                  ⌽⍵ reverse the argument



                                                   pick the first element (this is the tail)



                                                  t← assign to t (for tail)



                                                  ⍵< for each of the original digits, see if it is less than that



                                                   pick the first true/false



                                                : if so:



                                                  0 return false



                                                 then:



                                                3:: if from now on, an index error (out of bounds) happens:



                                                  1 return true



                                                  ¯1↓⍵ drop the last digit



                                                   yield that (separates 1 and ¯1 so they won't form a single array)



                                                  t+@1 add the tail to the first digit (the head)



                                                  10| mod-10



                                                   recurse



                                                Once we hit a single digit, ¯1↓ will make that an empty list, and @1 will cause an index error as there is no first digit, causing the function to return true.






                                                share|improve this answer

























                                                  up vote
                                                  3
                                                  down vote










                                                  up vote
                                                  3
                                                  down vote










                                                  APL (Dyalog Unicode), 33 bytesSBCS



                                                  Anonymous tacit prefix function taking a string as argument.



                                                  {⊃⍵<t←⊃⌽⍵:0⋄3::1⋄∇10|t+@1⊢¯1↓⍵}⍎¨


                                                  Try it online!



                                                  ⍎¨ evaluate each character (this gives us a list of digits)



                                                  {} apply the following "dfn" to that; is the argument (list of digits):



                                                    ⌽⍵ reverse the argument



                                                     pick the first element (this is the tail)



                                                    t← assign to t (for tail)



                                                    ⍵< for each of the original digits, see if it is less than that



                                                     pick the first true/false



                                                  : if so:



                                                    0 return false



                                                   then:



                                                  3:: if from now on, an index error (out of bounds) happens:



                                                    1 return true



                                                    ¯1↓⍵ drop the last digit



                                                     yield that (separates 1 and ¯1 so they won't form a single array)



                                                    t+@1 add the tail to the first digit (the head)



                                                    10| mod-10



                                                     recurse



                                                  Once we hit a single digit, ¯1↓ will make that an empty list, and @1 will cause an index error as there is no first digit, causing the function to return true.






                                                  share|improve this answer















                                                  APL (Dyalog Unicode), 33 bytesSBCS



                                                  Anonymous tacit prefix function taking a string as argument.



                                                  {⊃⍵<t←⊃⌽⍵:0⋄3::1⋄∇10|t+@1⊢¯1↓⍵}⍎¨


                                                  Try it online!



                                                  ⍎¨ evaluate each character (this gives us a list of digits)



                                                  {} apply the following "dfn" to that; is the argument (list of digits):



                                                    ⌽⍵ reverse the argument



                                                     pick the first element (this is the tail)



                                                    t← assign to t (for tail)



                                                    ⍵< for each of the original digits, see if it is less than that



                                                     pick the first true/false



                                                  : if so:



                                                    0 return false



                                                   then:



                                                  3:: if from now on, an index error (out of bounds) happens:



                                                    1 return true



                                                    ¯1↓⍵ drop the last digit



                                                     yield that (separates 1 and ¯1 so they won't form a single array)



                                                    t+@1 add the tail to the first digit (the head)



                                                    10| mod-10



                                                     recurse



                                                  Once we hit a single digit, ¯1↓ will make that an empty list, and @1 will cause an index error as there is no first digit, causing the function to return true.







                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                  edited Dec 7 at 9:21

























                                                  answered Dec 7 at 9:02









                                                  Adám

                                                  28.5k269187




                                                  28.5k269187






















                                                      up vote
                                                      3
                                                      down vote














                                                      Python 3, 77 bytes





                                                      p,*s=map(int,input())
                                                      print(all(n<=sum(s[i+1:],p)%10for i,n in enumerate(s)))


                                                      Try it online!





                                                      And my old solution with a recursive approach




                                                      Python 3, 90 bytes





                                                      f=lambda x,a=0:2>len(x)if 2>len(x)or(int(x[0])+a)%10<int(x[-1])else f(x[:-1],a+int(x[-1]))


                                                      Try it online!



                                                      Takes input as a string.






                                                      share|improve this answer



























                                                        up vote
                                                        3
                                                        down vote














                                                        Python 3, 77 bytes





                                                        p,*s=map(int,input())
                                                        print(all(n<=sum(s[i+1:],p)%10for i,n in enumerate(s)))


                                                        Try it online!





                                                        And my old solution with a recursive approach




                                                        Python 3, 90 bytes





                                                        f=lambda x,a=0:2>len(x)if 2>len(x)or(int(x[0])+a)%10<int(x[-1])else f(x[:-1],a+int(x[-1]))


                                                        Try it online!



                                                        Takes input as a string.






                                                        share|improve this answer

























                                                          up vote
                                                          3
                                                          down vote










                                                          up vote
                                                          3
                                                          down vote










                                                          Python 3, 77 bytes





                                                          p,*s=map(int,input())
                                                          print(all(n<=sum(s[i+1:],p)%10for i,n in enumerate(s)))


                                                          Try it online!





                                                          And my old solution with a recursive approach




                                                          Python 3, 90 bytes





                                                          f=lambda x,a=0:2>len(x)if 2>len(x)or(int(x[0])+a)%10<int(x[-1])else f(x[:-1],a+int(x[-1]))


                                                          Try it online!



                                                          Takes input as a string.






                                                          share|improve this answer















                                                          Python 3, 77 bytes





                                                          p,*s=map(int,input())
                                                          print(all(n<=sum(s[i+1:],p)%10for i,n in enumerate(s)))


                                                          Try it online!





                                                          And my old solution with a recursive approach




                                                          Python 3, 90 bytes





                                                          f=lambda x,a=0:2>len(x)if 2>len(x)or(int(x[0])+a)%10<int(x[-1])else f(x[:-1],a+int(x[-1]))


                                                          Try it online!



                                                          Takes input as a string.







                                                          share|improve this answer














                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                          share|improve this answer








                                                          edited Dec 7 at 13:37

























                                                          answered Dec 7 at 10:43









                                                          Black Owl Kai

                                                          5717




                                                          5717






















                                                              up vote
                                                              3
                                                              down vote














                                                              Python 3, 50 bytes



                                                              First line stolen from Black Owl Kai's answer.





                                                              p,*s=map(int,input())
                                                              while s:*s,k=s;p%10<k>q;p+=k


                                                              Try it online!



                                                              Output is via exit code. Fails (1) for falsy inputs and finishes (0) for truthy inputs.






                                                              share|improve this answer

























                                                                up vote
                                                                3
                                                                down vote














                                                                Python 3, 50 bytes



                                                                First line stolen from Black Owl Kai's answer.





                                                                p,*s=map(int,input())
                                                                while s:*s,k=s;p%10<k>q;p+=k


                                                                Try it online!



                                                                Output is via exit code. Fails (1) for falsy inputs and finishes (0) for truthy inputs.






                                                                share|improve this answer























                                                                  up vote
                                                                  3
                                                                  down vote










                                                                  up vote
                                                                  3
                                                                  down vote










                                                                  Python 3, 50 bytes



                                                                  First line stolen from Black Owl Kai's answer.





                                                                  p,*s=map(int,input())
                                                                  while s:*s,k=s;p%10<k>q;p+=k


                                                                  Try it online!



                                                                  Output is via exit code. Fails (1) for falsy inputs and finishes (0) for truthy inputs.






                                                                  share|improve this answer













                                                                  Python 3, 50 bytes



                                                                  First line stolen from Black Owl Kai's answer.





                                                                  p,*s=map(int,input())
                                                                  while s:*s,k=s;p%10<k>q;p+=k


                                                                  Try it online!



                                                                  Output is via exit code. Fails (1) for falsy inputs and finishes (0) for truthy inputs.







                                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                                  share|improve this answer










                                                                  answered Dec 7 at 14:38









                                                                  ovs

                                                                  18.6k21059




                                                                  18.6k21059






















                                                                      up vote
                                                                      3
                                                                      down vote














                                                                      Python 2, 105 82 81 bytes





                                                                      i,x=map(int,input()),1
                                                                      for y in i[:0:-1]:
                                                                      if i[0]%10<y:x=0
                                                                      else:i[0]+=y
                                                                      print x


                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                      Many thanks for a massive -23 from @ØrjanJohansen



                                                                      Thanks to @VedantKandoi (and @ØrjanJohansen) for another -1






                                                                      share|improve this answer



















                                                                      • 1




                                                                        You can use for with a reverse slice, and also do the %10 only when testing: Try it online!
                                                                        – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                        Dec 7 at 10:59








                                                                      • 1




                                                                        Swap the if-else condition, if i[0]<i[-1]:x=0 and then else:..... @ØrjanJohansen, in your answer too.
                                                                        – Vedant Kandoi
                                                                        Dec 7 at 12:13










                                                                      • @ØrjanJohansen - Thanks. That's well cool.
                                                                        – ElPedro
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:00










                                                                      • Hey @VedantKandoi. Sounds good but not sure exactly what you mean. You have me beaten on that one. Can you add a TIO please? When I try it works for all True cases but not for all of the False.
                                                                        – ElPedro
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:15






                                                                      • 1




                                                                        I think @VedantKandoi means this.
                                                                        – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:29

















                                                                      up vote
                                                                      3
                                                                      down vote














                                                                      Python 2, 105 82 81 bytes





                                                                      i,x=map(int,input()),1
                                                                      for y in i[:0:-1]:
                                                                      if i[0]%10<y:x=0
                                                                      else:i[0]+=y
                                                                      print x


                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                      Many thanks for a massive -23 from @ØrjanJohansen



                                                                      Thanks to @VedantKandoi (and @ØrjanJohansen) for another -1






                                                                      share|improve this answer



















                                                                      • 1




                                                                        You can use for with a reverse slice, and also do the %10 only when testing: Try it online!
                                                                        – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                        Dec 7 at 10:59








                                                                      • 1




                                                                        Swap the if-else condition, if i[0]<i[-1]:x=0 and then else:..... @ØrjanJohansen, in your answer too.
                                                                        – Vedant Kandoi
                                                                        Dec 7 at 12:13










                                                                      • @ØrjanJohansen - Thanks. That's well cool.
                                                                        – ElPedro
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:00










                                                                      • Hey @VedantKandoi. Sounds good but not sure exactly what you mean. You have me beaten on that one. Can you add a TIO please? When I try it works for all True cases but not for all of the False.
                                                                        – ElPedro
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:15






                                                                      • 1




                                                                        I think @VedantKandoi means this.
                                                                        – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:29















                                                                      up vote
                                                                      3
                                                                      down vote










                                                                      up vote
                                                                      3
                                                                      down vote










                                                                      Python 2, 105 82 81 bytes





                                                                      i,x=map(int,input()),1
                                                                      for y in i[:0:-1]:
                                                                      if i[0]%10<y:x=0
                                                                      else:i[0]+=y
                                                                      print x


                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                      Many thanks for a massive -23 from @ØrjanJohansen



                                                                      Thanks to @VedantKandoi (and @ØrjanJohansen) for another -1






                                                                      share|improve this answer















                                                                      Python 2, 105 82 81 bytes





                                                                      i,x=map(int,input()),1
                                                                      for y in i[:0:-1]:
                                                                      if i[0]%10<y:x=0
                                                                      else:i[0]+=y
                                                                      print x


                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                      Many thanks for a massive -23 from @ØrjanJohansen



                                                                      Thanks to @VedantKandoi (and @ØrjanJohansen) for another -1







                                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                                      edited Dec 7 at 22:05

























                                                                      answered Dec 7 at 8:51









                                                                      ElPedro

                                                                      3,4531023




                                                                      3,4531023








                                                                      • 1




                                                                        You can use for with a reverse slice, and also do the %10 only when testing: Try it online!
                                                                        – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                        Dec 7 at 10:59








                                                                      • 1




                                                                        Swap the if-else condition, if i[0]<i[-1]:x=0 and then else:..... @ØrjanJohansen, in your answer too.
                                                                        – Vedant Kandoi
                                                                        Dec 7 at 12:13










                                                                      • @ØrjanJohansen - Thanks. That's well cool.
                                                                        – ElPedro
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:00










                                                                      • Hey @VedantKandoi. Sounds good but not sure exactly what you mean. You have me beaten on that one. Can you add a TIO please? When I try it works for all True cases but not for all of the False.
                                                                        – ElPedro
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:15






                                                                      • 1




                                                                        I think @VedantKandoi means this.
                                                                        – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:29
















                                                                      • 1




                                                                        You can use for with a reverse slice, and also do the %10 only when testing: Try it online!
                                                                        – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                        Dec 7 at 10:59








                                                                      • 1




                                                                        Swap the if-else condition, if i[0]<i[-1]:x=0 and then else:..... @ØrjanJohansen, in your answer too.
                                                                        – Vedant Kandoi
                                                                        Dec 7 at 12:13










                                                                      • @ØrjanJohansen - Thanks. That's well cool.
                                                                        – ElPedro
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:00










                                                                      • Hey @VedantKandoi. Sounds good but not sure exactly what you mean. You have me beaten on that one. Can you add a TIO please? When I try it works for all True cases but not for all of the False.
                                                                        – ElPedro
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:15






                                                                      • 1




                                                                        I think @VedantKandoi means this.
                                                                        – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                        Dec 7 at 21:29










                                                                      1




                                                                      1




                                                                      You can use for with a reverse slice, and also do the %10 only when testing: Try it online!
                                                                      – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                      Dec 7 at 10:59






                                                                      You can use for with a reverse slice, and also do the %10 only when testing: Try it online!
                                                                      – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                      Dec 7 at 10:59






                                                                      1




                                                                      1




                                                                      Swap the if-else condition, if i[0]<i[-1]:x=0 and then else:..... @ØrjanJohansen, in your answer too.
                                                                      – Vedant Kandoi
                                                                      Dec 7 at 12:13




                                                                      Swap the if-else condition, if i[0]<i[-1]:x=0 and then else:..... @ØrjanJohansen, in your answer too.
                                                                      – Vedant Kandoi
                                                                      Dec 7 at 12:13












                                                                      @ØrjanJohansen - Thanks. That's well cool.
                                                                      – ElPedro
                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:00




                                                                      @ØrjanJohansen - Thanks. That's well cool.
                                                                      – ElPedro
                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:00












                                                                      Hey @VedantKandoi. Sounds good but not sure exactly what you mean. You have me beaten on that one. Can you add a TIO please? When I try it works for all True cases but not for all of the False.
                                                                      – ElPedro
                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:15




                                                                      Hey @VedantKandoi. Sounds good but not sure exactly what you mean. You have me beaten on that one. Can you add a TIO please? When I try it works for all True cases but not for all of the False.
                                                                      – ElPedro
                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:15




                                                                      1




                                                                      1




                                                                      I think @VedantKandoi means this.
                                                                      – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:29






                                                                      I think @VedantKandoi means this.
                                                                      – Ørjan Johansen
                                                                      Dec 7 at 21:29












                                                                      up vote
                                                                      2
                                                                      down vote














                                                                      Perl 5, 64 bytes





                                                                      {local$_=pop;1while s/(.)(.*)(.)/$1<$3?'':(($1+$3)%10).$2/e;/./}


                                                                      Try it online!






                                                                      share|improve this answer

























                                                                        up vote
                                                                        2
                                                                        down vote














                                                                        Perl 5, 64 bytes





                                                                        {local$_=pop;1while s/(.)(.*)(.)/$1<$3?'':(($1+$3)%10).$2/e;/./}


                                                                        Try it online!






                                                                        share|improve this answer























                                                                          up vote
                                                                          2
                                                                          down vote










                                                                          up vote
                                                                          2
                                                                          down vote










                                                                          Perl 5, 64 bytes





                                                                          {local$_=pop;1while s/(.)(.*)(.)/$1<$3?'':(($1+$3)%10).$2/e;/./}


                                                                          Try it online!






                                                                          share|improve this answer













                                                                          Perl 5, 64 bytes





                                                                          {local$_=pop;1while s/(.)(.*)(.)/$1<$3?'':(($1+$3)%10).$2/e;/./}


                                                                          Try it online!







                                                                          share|improve this answer












                                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                                          share|improve this answer










                                                                          answered Dec 8 at 1:20









                                                                          Kjetil S.

                                                                          55915




                                                                          55915






















                                                                              up vote
                                                                              2
                                                                              down vote














                                                                              Python 2, 75 67 bytes





                                                                              l=lambda n:n==n[0]or n[-1]<=n[0]*l(`int(n[0]+n[-1],11)%10`+n[1:-1])


                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                              Recursive lambda approach. Takes input as a string. Many thanks to Dennis for saving 8 bytes!






                                                                              share|improve this answer



























                                                                                up vote
                                                                                2
                                                                                down vote














                                                                                Python 2, 75 67 bytes





                                                                                l=lambda n:n==n[0]or n[-1]<=n[0]*l(`int(n[0]+n[-1],11)%10`+n[1:-1])


                                                                                Try it online!



                                                                                Recursive lambda approach. Takes input as a string. Many thanks to Dennis for saving 8 bytes!






                                                                                share|improve this answer

























                                                                                  up vote
                                                                                  2
                                                                                  down vote










                                                                                  up vote
                                                                                  2
                                                                                  down vote










                                                                                  Python 2, 75 67 bytes





                                                                                  l=lambda n:n==n[0]or n[-1]<=n[0]*l(`int(n[0]+n[-1],11)%10`+n[1:-1])


                                                                                  Try it online!



                                                                                  Recursive lambda approach. Takes input as a string. Many thanks to Dennis for saving 8 bytes!






                                                                                  share|improve this answer















                                                                                  Python 2, 75 67 bytes





                                                                                  l=lambda n:n==n[0]or n[-1]<=n[0]*l(`int(n[0]+n[-1],11)%10`+n[1:-1])


                                                                                  Try it online!



                                                                                  Recursive lambda approach. Takes input as a string. Many thanks to Dennis for saving 8 bytes!







                                                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                                                  edited 2 days ago

























                                                                                  answered Dec 7 at 23:25









                                                                                  ArBo

                                                                                  212




                                                                                  212






















                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                      2
                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                      Haskell, 69 64 bytes





                                                                                      f n=read[show n!!0]#n
                                                                                      h#n=n<10||h>=mod n 10&&mod(h+n)10#div n 10


                                                                                      Try it online! Example usage: f 2632 yields True.



                                                                                      Edit: -5 bytes because mod (h + mod n 10) 10 = mod (h + n) 10






                                                                                      share|improve this answer























                                                                                      • nice use of ||, which helped me to shorten my answer, too. Thanks!
                                                                                        – nimi
                                                                                        2 days ago















                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                      2
                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                      Haskell, 69 64 bytes





                                                                                      f n=read[show n!!0]#n
                                                                                      h#n=n<10||h>=mod n 10&&mod(h+n)10#div n 10


                                                                                      Try it online! Example usage: f 2632 yields True.



                                                                                      Edit: -5 bytes because mod (h + mod n 10) 10 = mod (h + n) 10






                                                                                      share|improve this answer























                                                                                      • nice use of ||, which helped me to shorten my answer, too. Thanks!
                                                                                        – nimi
                                                                                        2 days ago













                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                      2
                                                                                      down vote










                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                      2
                                                                                      down vote










                                                                                      Haskell, 69 64 bytes





                                                                                      f n=read[show n!!0]#n
                                                                                      h#n=n<10||h>=mod n 10&&mod(h+n)10#div n 10


                                                                                      Try it online! Example usage: f 2632 yields True.



                                                                                      Edit: -5 bytes because mod (h + mod n 10) 10 = mod (h + n) 10






                                                                                      share|improve this answer















                                                                                      Haskell, 69 64 bytes





                                                                                      f n=read[show n!!0]#n
                                                                                      h#n=n<10||h>=mod n 10&&mod(h+n)10#div n 10


                                                                                      Try it online! Example usage: f 2632 yields True.



                                                                                      Edit: -5 bytes because mod (h + mod n 10) 10 = mod (h + n) 10







                                                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                                                      edited 2 days ago

























                                                                                      answered 2 days ago









                                                                                      Laikoni

                                                                                      19.5k43596




                                                                                      19.5k43596












                                                                                      • nice use of ||, which helped me to shorten my answer, too. Thanks!
                                                                                        – nimi
                                                                                        2 days ago


















                                                                                      • nice use of ||, which helped me to shorten my answer, too. Thanks!
                                                                                        – nimi
                                                                                        2 days ago
















                                                                                      nice use of ||, which helped me to shorten my answer, too. Thanks!
                                                                                      – nimi
                                                                                      2 days ago




                                                                                      nice use of ||, which helped me to shorten my answer, too. Thanks!
                                                                                      – nimi
                                                                                      2 days ago










                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                      2
                                                                                      down vote













                                                                                      Haskell, 70 64 60 bytes



                                                                                      f(a:b)=b==""||a>=last b&&f(last(show$read[a]+read b):init b)


                                                                                      Input is taken as a string.



                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                      Edit: -6 bytes by using @Laikoni's trick of using || instead of separate guards. Another -4 bytes thanks to @Laikoni.






                                                                                      share|improve this answer



















                                                                                      • 2




                                                                                        read[l b] can be just read b because you only look at the last digit anyway. Saves 4 more bytes by also in-lining last: Try it online!
                                                                                        – Laikoni
                                                                                        2 days ago















                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                      2
                                                                                      down vote













                                                                                      Haskell, 70 64 60 bytes



                                                                                      f(a:b)=b==""||a>=last b&&f(last(show$read[a]+read b):init b)


                                                                                      Input is taken as a string.



                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                      Edit: -6 bytes by using @Laikoni's trick of using || instead of separate guards. Another -4 bytes thanks to @Laikoni.






                                                                                      share|improve this answer



















                                                                                      • 2




                                                                                        read[l b] can be just read b because you only look at the last digit anyway. Saves 4 more bytes by also in-lining last: Try it online!
                                                                                        – Laikoni
                                                                                        2 days ago













                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                      2
                                                                                      down vote










                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                      2
                                                                                      down vote









                                                                                      Haskell, 70 64 60 bytes



                                                                                      f(a:b)=b==""||a>=last b&&f(last(show$read[a]+read b):init b)


                                                                                      Input is taken as a string.



                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                      Edit: -6 bytes by using @Laikoni's trick of using || instead of separate guards. Another -4 bytes thanks to @Laikoni.






                                                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                                                      Haskell, 70 64 60 bytes



                                                                                      f(a:b)=b==""||a>=last b&&f(last(show$read[a]+read b):init b)


                                                                                      Input is taken as a string.



                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                      Edit: -6 bytes by using @Laikoni's trick of using || instead of separate guards. Another -4 bytes thanks to @Laikoni.







                                                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                                                      edited 2 days ago

























                                                                                      answered Dec 7 at 21:54









                                                                                      nimi

                                                                                      31k31985




                                                                                      31k31985








                                                                                      • 2




                                                                                        read[l b] can be just read b because you only look at the last digit anyway. Saves 4 more bytes by also in-lining last: Try it online!
                                                                                        – Laikoni
                                                                                        2 days ago














                                                                                      • 2




                                                                                        read[l b] can be just read b because you only look at the last digit anyway. Saves 4 more bytes by also in-lining last: Try it online!
                                                                                        – Laikoni
                                                                                        2 days ago








                                                                                      2




                                                                                      2




                                                                                      read[l b] can be just read b because you only look at the last digit anyway. Saves 4 more bytes by also in-lining last: Try it online!
                                                                                      – Laikoni
                                                                                      2 days ago




                                                                                      read[l b] can be just read b because you only look at the last digit anyway. Saves 4 more bytes by also in-lining last: Try it online!
                                                                                      – Laikoni
                                                                                      2 days ago










                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                      2
                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                      Brachylog, 23 bytes



                                                                                      ẹ{bkK&⟨h{≥₁+tg}t⟩,K↰|Ȯ}


                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                      This is a 1 byte save over Fatalize's solution.
                                                                                      This uses a recursive approach instead of a iterative



                                                                                      Explanation



                                                                                      ẹ                          Input into a list of digits
                                                                                      { } Assert that either
                                                                                      bk | the list has at least 2 elements (see later)
                                                                                      ⟨h{ }t⟩ | and that [head, tail]
                                                                                      ≥₁ | | is increasing (head >= tail)
                                                                                      + | | and their sum
                                                                                      t | | mod 10 (take last digit)
                                                                                      g | | as single element of a list
                                                                                      , | concatenated with
                                                                                      bkK K | the number without head and tail (this constrains the number to have at least 2 digits)
                                                                                      ↰ | and that this constraint also works on the newly formed number
                                                                                      |Ȯ | OR is a 1 digit number





                                                                                      share|improve this answer

























                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                        2
                                                                                        down vote














                                                                                        Brachylog, 23 bytes



                                                                                        ẹ{bkK&⟨h{≥₁+tg}t⟩,K↰|Ȯ}


                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                        This is a 1 byte save over Fatalize's solution.
                                                                                        This uses a recursive approach instead of a iterative



                                                                                        Explanation



                                                                                        ẹ                          Input into a list of digits
                                                                                        { } Assert that either
                                                                                        bk | the list has at least 2 elements (see later)
                                                                                        ⟨h{ }t⟩ | and that [head, tail]
                                                                                        ≥₁ | | is increasing (head >= tail)
                                                                                        + | | and their sum
                                                                                        t | | mod 10 (take last digit)
                                                                                        g | | as single element of a list
                                                                                        , | concatenated with
                                                                                        bkK K | the number without head and tail (this constrains the number to have at least 2 digits)
                                                                                        ↰ | and that this constraint also works on the newly formed number
                                                                                        |Ȯ | OR is a 1 digit number





                                                                                        share|improve this answer























                                                                                          up vote
                                                                                          2
                                                                                          down vote










                                                                                          up vote
                                                                                          2
                                                                                          down vote










                                                                                          Brachylog, 23 bytes



                                                                                          ẹ{bkK&⟨h{≥₁+tg}t⟩,K↰|Ȯ}


                                                                                          Try it online!



                                                                                          This is a 1 byte save over Fatalize's solution.
                                                                                          This uses a recursive approach instead of a iterative



                                                                                          Explanation



                                                                                          ẹ                          Input into a list of digits
                                                                                          { } Assert that either
                                                                                          bk | the list has at least 2 elements (see later)
                                                                                          ⟨h{ }t⟩ | and that [head, tail]
                                                                                          ≥₁ | | is increasing (head >= tail)
                                                                                          + | | and their sum
                                                                                          t | | mod 10 (take last digit)
                                                                                          g | | as single element of a list
                                                                                          , | concatenated with
                                                                                          bkK K | the number without head and tail (this constrains the number to have at least 2 digits)
                                                                                          ↰ | and that this constraint also works on the newly formed number
                                                                                          |Ȯ | OR is a 1 digit number





                                                                                          share|improve this answer













                                                                                          Brachylog, 23 bytes



                                                                                          ẹ{bkK&⟨h{≥₁+tg}t⟩,K↰|Ȯ}


                                                                                          Try it online!



                                                                                          This is a 1 byte save over Fatalize's solution.
                                                                                          This uses a recursive approach instead of a iterative



                                                                                          Explanation



                                                                                          ẹ                          Input into a list of digits
                                                                                          { } Assert that either
                                                                                          bk | the list has at least 2 elements (see later)
                                                                                          ⟨h{ }t⟩ | and that [head, tail]
                                                                                          ≥₁ | | is increasing (head >= tail)
                                                                                          + | | and their sum
                                                                                          t | | mod 10 (take last digit)
                                                                                          g | | as single element of a list
                                                                                          , | concatenated with
                                                                                          bkK K | the number without head and tail (this constrains the number to have at least 2 digits)
                                                                                          ↰ | and that this constraint also works on the newly formed number
                                                                                          |Ȯ | OR is a 1 digit number






                                                                                          share|improve this answer












                                                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                                                          share|improve this answer










                                                                                          answered 15 hours ago









                                                                                          Kroppeb

                                                                                          1,04628




                                                                                          1,04628






















                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                              1
                                                                                              down vote














                                                                                              Retina 0.8.2, 42 bytes



                                                                                              d
                                                                                              $*#;
                                                                                              ^((#*).*;)2;$
                                                                                              $2$1
                                                                                              }`#{10}

                                                                                              ^#*;$


                                                                                              Try it online! Link include test cases. Explanation:



                                                                                              d
                                                                                              $*#;


                                                                                              Convert the digits to unary and insert separators.



                                                                                              ^((#*).*;)2;$
                                                                                              $2$1


                                                                                              If the last digit is not greater than the first then add them together.



                                                                                              #{10}


                                                                                              Reduce modulo 10 if appropriate.



                                                                                              }`


                                                                                              Repeat until the last digit is greater than the first or there is only one digit left.



                                                                                              ^#*;$


                                                                                              Test whether there is only one digit left.






                                                                                              share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                1
                                                                                                down vote














                                                                                                Retina 0.8.2, 42 bytes



                                                                                                d
                                                                                                $*#;
                                                                                                ^((#*).*;)2;$
                                                                                                $2$1
                                                                                                }`#{10}

                                                                                                ^#*;$


                                                                                                Try it online! Link include test cases. Explanation:



                                                                                                d
                                                                                                $*#;


                                                                                                Convert the digits to unary and insert separators.



                                                                                                ^((#*).*;)2;$
                                                                                                $2$1


                                                                                                If the last digit is not greater than the first then add them together.



                                                                                                #{10}


                                                                                                Reduce modulo 10 if appropriate.



                                                                                                }`


                                                                                                Repeat until the last digit is greater than the first or there is only one digit left.



                                                                                                ^#*;$


                                                                                                Test whether there is only one digit left.






                                                                                                share|improve this answer























                                                                                                  up vote
                                                                                                  1
                                                                                                  down vote










                                                                                                  up vote
                                                                                                  1
                                                                                                  down vote










                                                                                                  Retina 0.8.2, 42 bytes



                                                                                                  d
                                                                                                  $*#;
                                                                                                  ^((#*).*;)2;$
                                                                                                  $2$1
                                                                                                  }`#{10}

                                                                                                  ^#*;$


                                                                                                  Try it online! Link include test cases. Explanation:



                                                                                                  d
                                                                                                  $*#;


                                                                                                  Convert the digits to unary and insert separators.



                                                                                                  ^((#*).*;)2;$
                                                                                                  $2$1


                                                                                                  If the last digit is not greater than the first then add them together.



                                                                                                  #{10}


                                                                                                  Reduce modulo 10 if appropriate.



                                                                                                  }`


                                                                                                  Repeat until the last digit is greater than the first or there is only one digit left.



                                                                                                  ^#*;$


                                                                                                  Test whether there is only one digit left.






                                                                                                  share|improve this answer













                                                                                                  Retina 0.8.2, 42 bytes



                                                                                                  d
                                                                                                  $*#;
                                                                                                  ^((#*).*;)2;$
                                                                                                  $2$1
                                                                                                  }`#{10}

                                                                                                  ^#*;$


                                                                                                  Try it online! Link include test cases. Explanation:



                                                                                                  d
                                                                                                  $*#;


                                                                                                  Convert the digits to unary and insert separators.



                                                                                                  ^((#*).*;)2;$
                                                                                                  $2$1


                                                                                                  If the last digit is not greater than the first then add them together.



                                                                                                  #{10}


                                                                                                  Reduce modulo 10 if appropriate.



                                                                                                  }`


                                                                                                  Repeat until the last digit is greater than the first or there is only one digit left.



                                                                                                  ^#*;$


                                                                                                  Test whether there is only one digit left.







                                                                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                                                                  share|improve this answer










                                                                                                  answered Dec 7 at 9:27









                                                                                                  Neil

                                                                                                  78.6k744175




                                                                                                  78.6k744175






















                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                      1
                                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                                      05AB1E, 26 25 24 bytes



                                                                                                      [DgD#ÁD2£D`›i0qëSOθs¦¦«


                                                                                                      Can probably be golfed a bit more.. It feels overly long, but maybe the challenge is in terms of code more complex than I thought beforehand.



                                                                                                      Try it online or verify all test cases.



                                                                                                      Explanation:





                                                                                                      [                 # Start an infinite loop
                                                                                                      D # Duplicate the top of the stack
                                                                                                      # (which is the input implicitly in the first iteration)
                                                                                                      gD # Take its length and duplicate it
                                                                                                      # # If its a single digit:
                                                                                                      # Stop the infinite loop
                                                                                                      # (and output the duplicated length of 1 (truthy) implicitly)
                                                                                                      # Else:
                                                                                                      # Discard the duplicate length
                                                                                                      Á # Rotate the digits once towards the left
                                                                                                      D2£ # Duplicate, and take the first two digits of the rotated number
                                                                                                      D` # Duplicate, and push the digits loose to the stack
                                                                                                      ›i # If the first digit is larger than the second digit:
                                                                                                      0 # Push a 0 (falsey)
                                                                                                      q # Stop the program (and output 0 implicitly)
                                                                                                      ë # Else (first digit is smaller than or equal to the second digit):
                                                                                                      SO # Sum the two digits
                                                                                                      θ # Leave only the last digit of that sum
                                                                                                      s # Swap to take the rotated number
                                                                                                      ¦¦ # Remove the first two digits
                                                                                                      « # Merge it together with the calculated new digit





                                                                                                      share|improve this answer



























                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                        1
                                                                                                        down vote














                                                                                                        05AB1E, 26 25 24 bytes



                                                                                                        [DgD#ÁD2£D`›i0qëSOθs¦¦«


                                                                                                        Can probably be golfed a bit more.. It feels overly long, but maybe the challenge is in terms of code more complex than I thought beforehand.



                                                                                                        Try it online or verify all test cases.



                                                                                                        Explanation:





                                                                                                        [                 # Start an infinite loop
                                                                                                        D # Duplicate the top of the stack
                                                                                                        # (which is the input implicitly in the first iteration)
                                                                                                        gD # Take its length and duplicate it
                                                                                                        # # If its a single digit:
                                                                                                        # Stop the infinite loop
                                                                                                        # (and output the duplicated length of 1 (truthy) implicitly)
                                                                                                        # Else:
                                                                                                        # Discard the duplicate length
                                                                                                        Á # Rotate the digits once towards the left
                                                                                                        D2£ # Duplicate, and take the first two digits of the rotated number
                                                                                                        D` # Duplicate, and push the digits loose to the stack
                                                                                                        ›i # If the first digit is larger than the second digit:
                                                                                                        0 # Push a 0 (falsey)
                                                                                                        q # Stop the program (and output 0 implicitly)
                                                                                                        ë # Else (first digit is smaller than or equal to the second digit):
                                                                                                        SO # Sum the two digits
                                                                                                        θ # Leave only the last digit of that sum
                                                                                                        s # Swap to take the rotated number
                                                                                                        ¦¦ # Remove the first two digits
                                                                                                        « # Merge it together with the calculated new digit





                                                                                                        share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                          up vote
                                                                                                          1
                                                                                                          down vote










                                                                                                          up vote
                                                                                                          1
                                                                                                          down vote










                                                                                                          05AB1E, 26 25 24 bytes



                                                                                                          [DgD#ÁD2£D`›i0qëSOθs¦¦«


                                                                                                          Can probably be golfed a bit more.. It feels overly long, but maybe the challenge is in terms of code more complex than I thought beforehand.



                                                                                                          Try it online or verify all test cases.



                                                                                                          Explanation:





                                                                                                          [                 # Start an infinite loop
                                                                                                          D # Duplicate the top of the stack
                                                                                                          # (which is the input implicitly in the first iteration)
                                                                                                          gD # Take its length and duplicate it
                                                                                                          # # If its a single digit:
                                                                                                          # Stop the infinite loop
                                                                                                          # (and output the duplicated length of 1 (truthy) implicitly)
                                                                                                          # Else:
                                                                                                          # Discard the duplicate length
                                                                                                          Á # Rotate the digits once towards the left
                                                                                                          D2£ # Duplicate, and take the first two digits of the rotated number
                                                                                                          D` # Duplicate, and push the digits loose to the stack
                                                                                                          ›i # If the first digit is larger than the second digit:
                                                                                                          0 # Push a 0 (falsey)
                                                                                                          q # Stop the program (and output 0 implicitly)
                                                                                                          ë # Else (first digit is smaller than or equal to the second digit):
                                                                                                          SO # Sum the two digits
                                                                                                          θ # Leave only the last digit of that sum
                                                                                                          s # Swap to take the rotated number
                                                                                                          ¦¦ # Remove the first two digits
                                                                                                          « # Merge it together with the calculated new digit





                                                                                                          share|improve this answer















                                                                                                          05AB1E, 26 25 24 bytes



                                                                                                          [DgD#ÁD2£D`›i0qëSOθs¦¦«


                                                                                                          Can probably be golfed a bit more.. It feels overly long, but maybe the challenge is in terms of code more complex than I thought beforehand.



                                                                                                          Try it online or verify all test cases.



                                                                                                          Explanation:





                                                                                                          [                 # Start an infinite loop
                                                                                                          D # Duplicate the top of the stack
                                                                                                          # (which is the input implicitly in the first iteration)
                                                                                                          gD # Take its length and duplicate it
                                                                                                          # # If its a single digit:
                                                                                                          # Stop the infinite loop
                                                                                                          # (and output the duplicated length of 1 (truthy) implicitly)
                                                                                                          # Else:
                                                                                                          # Discard the duplicate length
                                                                                                          Á # Rotate the digits once towards the left
                                                                                                          D2£ # Duplicate, and take the first two digits of the rotated number
                                                                                                          D` # Duplicate, and push the digits loose to the stack
                                                                                                          ›i # If the first digit is larger than the second digit:
                                                                                                          0 # Push a 0 (falsey)
                                                                                                          q # Stop the program (and output 0 implicitly)
                                                                                                          ë # Else (first digit is smaller than or equal to the second digit):
                                                                                                          SO # Sum the two digits
                                                                                                          θ # Leave only the last digit of that sum
                                                                                                          s # Swap to take the rotated number
                                                                                                          ¦¦ # Remove the first two digits
                                                                                                          « # Merge it together with the calculated new digit






                                                                                                          share|improve this answer














                                                                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                                                                          share|improve this answer








                                                                                                          edited Dec 7 at 11:13

























                                                                                                          answered Dec 7 at 9:12









                                                                                                          Kevin Cruijssen

                                                                                                          35k554184




                                                                                                          35k554184






















                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                              down vote














                                                                                                              Brachylog, 24 bytes



                                                                                                              ẹ;I⟨⟨h{≥₁+tg}t⟩c{bk}⟩ⁱ⁾Ȯ


                                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                                              I should change 's default behaviour so that it iterates an unknown number of times (currently, it iterates 1 time by default which is completely useless). I then wouldn't need the […];I[…]⁾, saving 3 bytes



                                                                                                              Explanation



                                                                                                              This program contains an ugly fork inside a fork. There is also some plumbing needed to work on lists of digits instead of numbers (because if we remove the head and tail of 76 we are left with 0, which doesn't work contrary to [7,6] where we end up with ).



                                                                                                              ẹ                          Input into a list of digits
                                                                                                              Ȯ While we don't have a single digit number…
                                                                                                              ;I ⁱ⁾ …Iterate I times (I being unknown)…
                                                                                                              ⟨ ⟩ …The following fork:
                                                                                                              c | Concatenate…
                                                                                                              ⟨ ⟩ | The output of the following fork:
                                                                                                              h t | | Take the head H and tail T of the number
                                                                                                              { } | | Then apply on [H,T]:
                                                                                                              ≥₁ | | | H ≥ T
                                                                                                              + | | | Sum them
                                                                                                              tg | | | Take the last digit (i.e. mod 10) and wrap it in a list
                                                                                                              { } | With the output of the following predicate:
                                                                                                              bk | | Remove the head and the tail of the number





                                                                                                              share|improve this answer





















                                                                                                              • Using recursion instead of iteration and replacing the c-fork to use , instead i could remove 1 byte Try it online!
                                                                                                                – Kroppeb
                                                                                                                16 hours ago










                                                                                                              • @Kroppeb Really cool. I think you should post your own answer, because it's significantly different than mine!
                                                                                                                – Fatalize
                                                                                                                16 hours ago

















                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                              down vote














                                                                                                              Brachylog, 24 bytes



                                                                                                              ẹ;I⟨⟨h{≥₁+tg}t⟩c{bk}⟩ⁱ⁾Ȯ


                                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                                              I should change 's default behaviour so that it iterates an unknown number of times (currently, it iterates 1 time by default which is completely useless). I then wouldn't need the […];I[…]⁾, saving 3 bytes



                                                                                                              Explanation



                                                                                                              This program contains an ugly fork inside a fork. There is also some plumbing needed to work on lists of digits instead of numbers (because if we remove the head and tail of 76 we are left with 0, which doesn't work contrary to [7,6] where we end up with ).



                                                                                                              ẹ                          Input into a list of digits
                                                                                                              Ȯ While we don't have a single digit number…
                                                                                                              ;I ⁱ⁾ …Iterate I times (I being unknown)…
                                                                                                              ⟨ ⟩ …The following fork:
                                                                                                              c | Concatenate…
                                                                                                              ⟨ ⟩ | The output of the following fork:
                                                                                                              h t | | Take the head H and tail T of the number
                                                                                                              { } | | Then apply on [H,T]:
                                                                                                              ≥₁ | | | H ≥ T
                                                                                                              + | | | Sum them
                                                                                                              tg | | | Take the last digit (i.e. mod 10) and wrap it in a list
                                                                                                              { } | With the output of the following predicate:
                                                                                                              bk | | Remove the head and the tail of the number





                                                                                                              share|improve this answer





















                                                                                                              • Using recursion instead of iteration and replacing the c-fork to use , instead i could remove 1 byte Try it online!
                                                                                                                – Kroppeb
                                                                                                                16 hours ago










                                                                                                              • @Kroppeb Really cool. I think you should post your own answer, because it's significantly different than mine!
                                                                                                                – Fatalize
                                                                                                                16 hours ago















                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                              down vote










                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                              down vote










                                                                                                              Brachylog, 24 bytes



                                                                                                              ẹ;I⟨⟨h{≥₁+tg}t⟩c{bk}⟩ⁱ⁾Ȯ


                                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                                              I should change 's default behaviour so that it iterates an unknown number of times (currently, it iterates 1 time by default which is completely useless). I then wouldn't need the […];I[…]⁾, saving 3 bytes



                                                                                                              Explanation



                                                                                                              This program contains an ugly fork inside a fork. There is also some plumbing needed to work on lists of digits instead of numbers (because if we remove the head and tail of 76 we are left with 0, which doesn't work contrary to [7,6] where we end up with ).



                                                                                                              ẹ                          Input into a list of digits
                                                                                                              Ȯ While we don't have a single digit number…
                                                                                                              ;I ⁱ⁾ …Iterate I times (I being unknown)…
                                                                                                              ⟨ ⟩ …The following fork:
                                                                                                              c | Concatenate…
                                                                                                              ⟨ ⟩ | The output of the following fork:
                                                                                                              h t | | Take the head H and tail T of the number
                                                                                                              { } | | Then apply on [H,T]:
                                                                                                              ≥₁ | | | H ≥ T
                                                                                                              + | | | Sum them
                                                                                                              tg | | | Take the last digit (i.e. mod 10) and wrap it in a list
                                                                                                              { } | With the output of the following predicate:
                                                                                                              bk | | Remove the head and the tail of the number





                                                                                                              share|improve this answer













                                                                                                              Brachylog, 24 bytes



                                                                                                              ẹ;I⟨⟨h{≥₁+tg}t⟩c{bk}⟩ⁱ⁾Ȯ


                                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                                              I should change 's default behaviour so that it iterates an unknown number of times (currently, it iterates 1 time by default which is completely useless). I then wouldn't need the […];I[…]⁾, saving 3 bytes



                                                                                                              Explanation



                                                                                                              This program contains an ugly fork inside a fork. There is also some plumbing needed to work on lists of digits instead of numbers (because if we remove the head and tail of 76 we are left with 0, which doesn't work contrary to [7,6] where we end up with ).



                                                                                                              ẹ                          Input into a list of digits
                                                                                                              Ȯ While we don't have a single digit number…
                                                                                                              ;I ⁱ⁾ …Iterate I times (I being unknown)…
                                                                                                              ⟨ ⟩ …The following fork:
                                                                                                              c | Concatenate…
                                                                                                              ⟨ ⟩ | The output of the following fork:
                                                                                                              h t | | Take the head H and tail T of the number
                                                                                                              { } | | Then apply on [H,T]:
                                                                                                              ≥₁ | | | H ≥ T
                                                                                                              + | | | Sum them
                                                                                                              tg | | | Take the last digit (i.e. mod 10) and wrap it in a list
                                                                                                              { } | With the output of the following predicate:
                                                                                                              bk | | Remove the head and the tail of the number






                                                                                                              share|improve this answer












                                                                                                              share|improve this answer



                                                                                                              share|improve this answer










                                                                                                              answered Dec 7 at 13:43









                                                                                                              Fatalize

                                                                                                              26.9k448134




                                                                                                              26.9k448134












                                                                                                              • Using recursion instead of iteration and replacing the c-fork to use , instead i could remove 1 byte Try it online!
                                                                                                                – Kroppeb
                                                                                                                16 hours ago










                                                                                                              • @Kroppeb Really cool. I think you should post your own answer, because it's significantly different than mine!
                                                                                                                – Fatalize
                                                                                                                16 hours ago




















                                                                                                              • Using recursion instead of iteration and replacing the c-fork to use , instead i could remove 1 byte Try it online!
                                                                                                                – Kroppeb
                                                                                                                16 hours ago










                                                                                                              • @Kroppeb Really cool. I think you should post your own answer, because it's significantly different than mine!
                                                                                                                – Fatalize
                                                                                                                16 hours ago


















                                                                                                              Using recursion instead of iteration and replacing the c-fork to use , instead i could remove 1 byte Try it online!
                                                                                                              – Kroppeb
                                                                                                              16 hours ago




                                                                                                              Using recursion instead of iteration and replacing the c-fork to use , instead i could remove 1 byte Try it online!
                                                                                                              – Kroppeb
                                                                                                              16 hours ago












                                                                                                              @Kroppeb Really cool. I think you should post your own answer, because it's significantly different than mine!
                                                                                                              – Fatalize
                                                                                                              16 hours ago






                                                                                                              @Kroppeb Really cool. I think you should post your own answer, because it's significantly different than mine!
                                                                                                              – Fatalize
                                                                                                              16 hours ago












                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                              down vote














                                                                                                              C++ (gcc), 144 bytes





                                                                                                              bool f(std::string b){int c=b.length();while(c>1){if(b[0]<b[c-1])return 0;else{b[0]=(b[0]-48+b[c-1]-48)%10+48;b=b.substr(0,c-1);--c;}}return 1;}


                                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                                              First time I'm trying something like this so if I formatted something wrong please let me know. I'm not 100% sure on the rules for stuff like using namespace to eliminate the 5 bytes "std::" so I left it in.



                                                                                                              Ungolfed:



                                                                                                              bool hunger(std::string input)
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              int count=input.length();
                                                                                                              while (count>1)
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              if (input[0]<input[count-1]) //if at any point the head cannot eat the tail we can quit the loop
                                                                                                              //comparisons can be done without switching from ascii
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              return false;
                                                                                                              }
                                                                                                              else
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              input[0]=(input[0]-48+input[count-1]-48)%10+48; //eating operation has to occur on integers so subtract 48 to convert from ASCII to a number
                                                                                                              input=input.substr(0,count-1); //get rid of the last number since it was eaten
                                                                                                              --count;
                                                                                                              }

                                                                                                              }
                                                                                                              return true; //if the end of the loop is reached the number has eaten itself
                                                                                                              }





                                                                                                              share|improve this answer








                                                                                                              New contributor




                                                                                                              Ben H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                                                                                                              • In theory you also need #include statements. However, I'd propose programming in the std lib facilities subdialect of C++ with #include "std_lib_facilities.h" prepended, which also does a using namespace std;. That header was written by the author of the language way back (lastest version is 2010) for students new to C++.
                                                                                                                – Yakk
                                                                                                                Dec 7 at 20:00












                                                                                                              • @Yakk Unless you make and publish an interpreter that does this for you, you still need to counts the include of std_lib_facilities.h.
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:03










                                                                                                              • @BenH Welcome to PPCG! You need the count all includes that are required to compile your function. The shortest method I know is #import<string>. Try it online!
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:08












                                                                                                              • @Dennis #!/usr/bin/sh newline gcc -include "std_lib_facilities.h" $@ -- if I find a C++ course that provides that shell script, would that count?
                                                                                                                – Yakk
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:19












                                                                                                              • @Yakk Didn't know about that switch. Unlike #include statements, command-line arguments are free because they're essentially a new language. In C++(gcc) -include iostream, this is indeed 144 bytes.
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:26















                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                              down vote














                                                                                                              C++ (gcc), 144 bytes





                                                                                                              bool f(std::string b){int c=b.length();while(c>1){if(b[0]<b[c-1])return 0;else{b[0]=(b[0]-48+b[c-1]-48)%10+48;b=b.substr(0,c-1);--c;}}return 1;}


                                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                                              First time I'm trying something like this so if I formatted something wrong please let me know. I'm not 100% sure on the rules for stuff like using namespace to eliminate the 5 bytes "std::" so I left it in.



                                                                                                              Ungolfed:



                                                                                                              bool hunger(std::string input)
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              int count=input.length();
                                                                                                              while (count>1)
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              if (input[0]<input[count-1]) //if at any point the head cannot eat the tail we can quit the loop
                                                                                                              //comparisons can be done without switching from ascii
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              return false;
                                                                                                              }
                                                                                                              else
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              input[0]=(input[0]-48+input[count-1]-48)%10+48; //eating operation has to occur on integers so subtract 48 to convert from ASCII to a number
                                                                                                              input=input.substr(0,count-1); //get rid of the last number since it was eaten
                                                                                                              --count;
                                                                                                              }

                                                                                                              }
                                                                                                              return true; //if the end of the loop is reached the number has eaten itself
                                                                                                              }





                                                                                                              share|improve this answer








                                                                                                              New contributor




                                                                                                              Ben H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                                                                                                              • In theory you also need #include statements. However, I'd propose programming in the std lib facilities subdialect of C++ with #include "std_lib_facilities.h" prepended, which also does a using namespace std;. That header was written by the author of the language way back (lastest version is 2010) for students new to C++.
                                                                                                                – Yakk
                                                                                                                Dec 7 at 20:00












                                                                                                              • @Yakk Unless you make and publish an interpreter that does this for you, you still need to counts the include of std_lib_facilities.h.
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:03










                                                                                                              • @BenH Welcome to PPCG! You need the count all includes that are required to compile your function. The shortest method I know is #import<string>. Try it online!
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:08












                                                                                                              • @Dennis #!/usr/bin/sh newline gcc -include "std_lib_facilities.h" $@ -- if I find a C++ course that provides that shell script, would that count?
                                                                                                                – Yakk
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:19












                                                                                                              • @Yakk Didn't know about that switch. Unlike #include statements, command-line arguments are free because they're essentially a new language. In C++(gcc) -include iostream, this is indeed 144 bytes.
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:26













                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                              down vote










                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                              down vote










                                                                                                              C++ (gcc), 144 bytes





                                                                                                              bool f(std::string b){int c=b.length();while(c>1){if(b[0]<b[c-1])return 0;else{b[0]=(b[0]-48+b[c-1]-48)%10+48;b=b.substr(0,c-1);--c;}}return 1;}


                                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                                              First time I'm trying something like this so if I formatted something wrong please let me know. I'm not 100% sure on the rules for stuff like using namespace to eliminate the 5 bytes "std::" so I left it in.



                                                                                                              Ungolfed:



                                                                                                              bool hunger(std::string input)
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              int count=input.length();
                                                                                                              while (count>1)
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              if (input[0]<input[count-1]) //if at any point the head cannot eat the tail we can quit the loop
                                                                                                              //comparisons can be done without switching from ascii
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              return false;
                                                                                                              }
                                                                                                              else
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              input[0]=(input[0]-48+input[count-1]-48)%10+48; //eating operation has to occur on integers so subtract 48 to convert from ASCII to a number
                                                                                                              input=input.substr(0,count-1); //get rid of the last number since it was eaten
                                                                                                              --count;
                                                                                                              }

                                                                                                              }
                                                                                                              return true; //if the end of the loop is reached the number has eaten itself
                                                                                                              }





                                                                                                              share|improve this answer








                                                                                                              New contributor




                                                                                                              Ben H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                                                                                              C++ (gcc), 144 bytes





                                                                                                              bool f(std::string b){int c=b.length();while(c>1){if(b[0]<b[c-1])return 0;else{b[0]=(b[0]-48+b[c-1]-48)%10+48;b=b.substr(0,c-1);--c;}}return 1;}


                                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                                              First time I'm trying something like this so if I formatted something wrong please let me know. I'm not 100% sure on the rules for stuff like using namespace to eliminate the 5 bytes "std::" so I left it in.



                                                                                                              Ungolfed:



                                                                                                              bool hunger(std::string input)
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              int count=input.length();
                                                                                                              while (count>1)
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              if (input[0]<input[count-1]) //if at any point the head cannot eat the tail we can quit the loop
                                                                                                              //comparisons can be done without switching from ascii
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              return false;
                                                                                                              }
                                                                                                              else
                                                                                                              {
                                                                                                              input[0]=(input[0]-48+input[count-1]-48)%10+48; //eating operation has to occur on integers so subtract 48 to convert from ASCII to a number
                                                                                                              input=input.substr(0,count-1); //get rid of the last number since it was eaten
                                                                                                              --count;
                                                                                                              }

                                                                                                              }
                                                                                                              return true; //if the end of the loop is reached the number has eaten itself
                                                                                                              }






                                                                                                              share|improve this answer








                                                                                                              New contributor




                                                                                                              Ben H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                                                                              share|improve this answer



                                                                                                              share|improve this answer






                                                                                                              New contributor




                                                                                                              Ben H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                                                                              answered Dec 7 at 19:42









                                                                                                              Ben H

                                                                                                              111




                                                                                                              111




                                                                                                              New contributor




                                                                                                              Ben H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                                                                                              New contributor





                                                                                                              Ben H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                                                                              Ben H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.












                                                                                                              • In theory you also need #include statements. However, I'd propose programming in the std lib facilities subdialect of C++ with #include "std_lib_facilities.h" prepended, which also does a using namespace std;. That header was written by the author of the language way back (lastest version is 2010) for students new to C++.
                                                                                                                – Yakk
                                                                                                                Dec 7 at 20:00












                                                                                                              • @Yakk Unless you make and publish an interpreter that does this for you, you still need to counts the include of std_lib_facilities.h.
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:03










                                                                                                              • @BenH Welcome to PPCG! You need the count all includes that are required to compile your function. The shortest method I know is #import<string>. Try it online!
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:08












                                                                                                              • @Dennis #!/usr/bin/sh newline gcc -include "std_lib_facilities.h" $@ -- if I find a C++ course that provides that shell script, would that count?
                                                                                                                – Yakk
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:19












                                                                                                              • @Yakk Didn't know about that switch. Unlike #include statements, command-line arguments are free because they're essentially a new language. In C++(gcc) -include iostream, this is indeed 144 bytes.
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:26


















                                                                                                              • In theory you also need #include statements. However, I'd propose programming in the std lib facilities subdialect of C++ with #include "std_lib_facilities.h" prepended, which also does a using namespace std;. That header was written by the author of the language way back (lastest version is 2010) for students new to C++.
                                                                                                                – Yakk
                                                                                                                Dec 7 at 20:00












                                                                                                              • @Yakk Unless you make and publish an interpreter that does this for you, you still need to counts the include of std_lib_facilities.h.
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:03










                                                                                                              • @BenH Welcome to PPCG! You need the count all includes that are required to compile your function. The shortest method I know is #import<string>. Try it online!
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:08












                                                                                                              • @Dennis #!/usr/bin/sh newline gcc -include "std_lib_facilities.h" $@ -- if I find a C++ course that provides that shell script, would that count?
                                                                                                                – Yakk
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:19












                                                                                                              • @Yakk Didn't know about that switch. Unlike #include statements, command-line arguments are free because they're essentially a new language. In C++(gcc) -include iostream, this is indeed 144 bytes.
                                                                                                                – Dennis
                                                                                                                Dec 8 at 2:26
















                                                                                                              In theory you also need #include statements. However, I'd propose programming in the std lib facilities subdialect of C++ with #include "std_lib_facilities.h" prepended, which also does a using namespace std;. That header was written by the author of the language way back (lastest version is 2010) for students new to C++.
                                                                                                              – Yakk
                                                                                                              Dec 7 at 20:00






                                                                                                              In theory you also need #include statements. However, I'd propose programming in the std lib facilities subdialect of C++ with #include "std_lib_facilities.h" prepended, which also does a using namespace std;. That header was written by the author of the language way back (lastest version is 2010) for students new to C++.
                                                                                                              – Yakk
                                                                                                              Dec 7 at 20:00














                                                                                                              @Yakk Unless you make and publish an interpreter that does this for you, you still need to counts the include of std_lib_facilities.h.
                                                                                                              – Dennis
                                                                                                              Dec 8 at 2:03




                                                                                                              @Yakk Unless you make and publish an interpreter that does this for you, you still need to counts the include of std_lib_facilities.h.
                                                                                                              – Dennis
                                                                                                              Dec 8 at 2:03












                                                                                                              @BenH Welcome to PPCG! You need the count all includes that are required to compile your function. The shortest method I know is #import<string>. Try it online!
                                                                                                              – Dennis
                                                                                                              Dec 8 at 2:08






                                                                                                              @BenH Welcome to PPCG! You need the count all includes that are required to compile your function. The shortest method I know is #import<string>. Try it online!
                                                                                                              – Dennis
                                                                                                              Dec 8 at 2:08














                                                                                                              @Dennis #!/usr/bin/sh newline gcc -include "std_lib_facilities.h" $@ -- if I find a C++ course that provides that shell script, would that count?
                                                                                                              – Yakk
                                                                                                              Dec 8 at 2:19






                                                                                                              @Dennis #!/usr/bin/sh newline gcc -include "std_lib_facilities.h" $@ -- if I find a C++ course that provides that shell script, would that count?
                                                                                                              – Yakk
                                                                                                              Dec 8 at 2:19














                                                                                                              @Yakk Didn't know about that switch. Unlike #include statements, command-line arguments are free because they're essentially a new language. In C++(gcc) -include iostream, this is indeed 144 bytes.
                                                                                                              – Dennis
                                                                                                              Dec 8 at 2:26




                                                                                                              @Yakk Didn't know about that switch. Unlike #include statements, command-line arguments are free because they're essentially a new language. In C++(gcc) -include iostream, this is indeed 144 bytes.
                                                                                                              – Dennis
                                                                                                              Dec 8 at 2:26










                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                              down vote













                                                                                                              C#, 114 bytes



                                                                                                              static bool L(string n){return n.Skip(1).Reverse().Select(x=>x%16).Aggregate(n[0]%16,(h,x)=>h>=x?(h+x)%10:-1)>=0;}


                                                                                                              Try it online






                                                                                                              share|improve this answer








                                                                                                              New contributor




                                                                                                              gwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                                1
                                                                                                                down vote













                                                                                                                C#, 114 bytes



                                                                                                                static bool L(string n){return n.Skip(1).Reverse().Select(x=>x%16).Aggregate(n[0]%16,(h,x)=>h>=x?(h+x)%10:-1)>=0;}


                                                                                                                Try it online






                                                                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                New contributor




                                                                                                                gwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                                Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                                                                                                                  up vote
                                                                                                                  1
                                                                                                                  down vote










                                                                                                                  up vote
                                                                                                                  1
                                                                                                                  down vote









                                                                                                                  C#, 114 bytes



                                                                                                                  static bool L(string n){return n.Skip(1).Reverse().Select(x=>x%16).Aggregate(n[0]%16,(h,x)=>h>=x?(h+x)%10:-1)>=0;}


                                                                                                                  Try it online






                                                                                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                  New contributor




                                                                                                                  gwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                                                                                  C#, 114 bytes



                                                                                                                  static bool L(string n){return n.Skip(1).Reverse().Select(x=>x%16).Aggregate(n[0]%16,(h,x)=>h>=x?(h+x)%10:-1)>=0;}


                                                                                                                  Try it online







                                                                                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                  New contributor




                                                                                                                  gwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                                                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                  share|improve this answer






                                                                                                                  New contributor




                                                                                                                  gwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                                                                                  answered Dec 7 at 23:52









                                                                                                                  gwell

                                                                                                                  1111




                                                                                                                  1111




                                                                                                                  New contributor




                                                                                                                  gwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                                                                                                  New contributor





                                                                                                                  gwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                                                                                  gwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                                                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                      1
                                                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                                                      C (gcc) (with string.h), 110 108 bytes





                                                                                                                      c;f(char*b){c=strlen(b);if(!c)return 1;char*d=b+c-1;if(*b<*d)return 0;*b=(*b+*d-96)%10+48;*d=0;return f(b);}


                                                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                                                      Still relatively new to PPCG, so the correct syntax for linking libraries as a new language is foreign to me. Also note that the function returns 0 or 1 for false/true, and printing that result to stdout does require stdio. If we're being pedantic and the exercise requires output, the language requires stdio that as well.



                                                                                                                      Conceptually similar to @BenH's answer, but in C, so kudos where they are due (Welcome to PPCG, btw), but using recursion. It also uses array pointer arithmetic, because dirty code is shorter than clean code.



                                                                                                                      The function is tail recursive, with exit conditions if the first number can't eat the last or the length is 1, returning false or true, respectively. These values are found by dereferencing a pointer to the C-String (which gives a char) at the beginning and end of the string, and doing the comparisons on them. pointer arithmetic is done to find the end of the string. finally, the last char is "erased" by replacing it with a null terminator (0).



                                                                                                                      It's possible that the modulus arithmetic could be shortened by a byte or two, but I already need a shower after that pointer manipulation.



                                                                                                                      Ungolfed Version Here



                                                                                                                      Update: Saved two bytes by replacing c==1 with !c. This is essentially c == 0. It will run an additional time, and will needlessly double itself before deleting itself, but saves two bytes. A side effect is null or zero length strings won't cause infinite recursion (though we shouldn't get null strings as the exercise says positive integers).






                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                      • You do not need to link libraries in the case of gcc - although warnings will be generated, gcc will happily compile your code without #includes. Also, you could save 4 bytes with -DR=return. Finally, in your test code, the s are unnecessary, as the string literally already include them implicitly.
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago








                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                        Furthermore, you can return from a function by assigning to the first variable: b=case1?res1:case2?res2:res_else; is the same as if(case1)return res1;if(case2)return res2;return res_else;
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • Even further, you can shed some extra bytes by not using c: you can determine if the string is zero-length from head-tail.
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • 77 bytes
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • Didn't realize you could use ternary (conditional) operators in C. Has that always been the case? Regardless, good to know; I'll be using them in the future. Cheers
                                                                                                                        – Andrew Baumher
                                                                                                                        2 days ago















                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                      1
                                                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                                                      C (gcc) (with string.h), 110 108 bytes





                                                                                                                      c;f(char*b){c=strlen(b);if(!c)return 1;char*d=b+c-1;if(*b<*d)return 0;*b=(*b+*d-96)%10+48;*d=0;return f(b);}


                                                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                                                      Still relatively new to PPCG, so the correct syntax for linking libraries as a new language is foreign to me. Also note that the function returns 0 or 1 for false/true, and printing that result to stdout does require stdio. If we're being pedantic and the exercise requires output, the language requires stdio that as well.



                                                                                                                      Conceptually similar to @BenH's answer, but in C, so kudos where they are due (Welcome to PPCG, btw), but using recursion. It also uses array pointer arithmetic, because dirty code is shorter than clean code.



                                                                                                                      The function is tail recursive, with exit conditions if the first number can't eat the last or the length is 1, returning false or true, respectively. These values are found by dereferencing a pointer to the C-String (which gives a char) at the beginning and end of the string, and doing the comparisons on them. pointer arithmetic is done to find the end of the string. finally, the last char is "erased" by replacing it with a null terminator (0).



                                                                                                                      It's possible that the modulus arithmetic could be shortened by a byte or two, but I already need a shower after that pointer manipulation.



                                                                                                                      Ungolfed Version Here



                                                                                                                      Update: Saved two bytes by replacing c==1 with !c. This is essentially c == 0. It will run an additional time, and will needlessly double itself before deleting itself, but saves two bytes. A side effect is null or zero length strings won't cause infinite recursion (though we shouldn't get null strings as the exercise says positive integers).






                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                      • You do not need to link libraries in the case of gcc - although warnings will be generated, gcc will happily compile your code without #includes. Also, you could save 4 bytes with -DR=return. Finally, in your test code, the s are unnecessary, as the string literally already include them implicitly.
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago








                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                        Furthermore, you can return from a function by assigning to the first variable: b=case1?res1:case2?res2:res_else; is the same as if(case1)return res1;if(case2)return res2;return res_else;
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • Even further, you can shed some extra bytes by not using c: you can determine if the string is zero-length from head-tail.
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • 77 bytes
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • Didn't realize you could use ternary (conditional) operators in C. Has that always been the case? Regardless, good to know; I'll be using them in the future. Cheers
                                                                                                                        – Andrew Baumher
                                                                                                                        2 days ago













                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                      1
                                                                                                                      down vote










                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                      1
                                                                                                                      down vote










                                                                                                                      C (gcc) (with string.h), 110 108 bytes





                                                                                                                      c;f(char*b){c=strlen(b);if(!c)return 1;char*d=b+c-1;if(*b<*d)return 0;*b=(*b+*d-96)%10+48;*d=0;return f(b);}


                                                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                                                      Still relatively new to PPCG, so the correct syntax for linking libraries as a new language is foreign to me. Also note that the function returns 0 or 1 for false/true, and printing that result to stdout does require stdio. If we're being pedantic and the exercise requires output, the language requires stdio that as well.



                                                                                                                      Conceptually similar to @BenH's answer, but in C, so kudos where they are due (Welcome to PPCG, btw), but using recursion. It also uses array pointer arithmetic, because dirty code is shorter than clean code.



                                                                                                                      The function is tail recursive, with exit conditions if the first number can't eat the last or the length is 1, returning false or true, respectively. These values are found by dereferencing a pointer to the C-String (which gives a char) at the beginning and end of the string, and doing the comparisons on them. pointer arithmetic is done to find the end of the string. finally, the last char is "erased" by replacing it with a null terminator (0).



                                                                                                                      It's possible that the modulus arithmetic could be shortened by a byte or two, but I already need a shower after that pointer manipulation.



                                                                                                                      Ungolfed Version Here



                                                                                                                      Update: Saved two bytes by replacing c==1 with !c. This is essentially c == 0. It will run an additional time, and will needlessly double itself before deleting itself, but saves two bytes. A side effect is null or zero length strings won't cause infinite recursion (though we shouldn't get null strings as the exercise says positive integers).






                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                      C (gcc) (with string.h), 110 108 bytes





                                                                                                                      c;f(char*b){c=strlen(b);if(!c)return 1;char*d=b+c-1;if(*b<*d)return 0;*b=(*b+*d-96)%10+48;*d=0;return f(b);}


                                                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                                                      Still relatively new to PPCG, so the correct syntax for linking libraries as a new language is foreign to me. Also note that the function returns 0 or 1 for false/true, and printing that result to stdout does require stdio. If we're being pedantic and the exercise requires output, the language requires stdio that as well.



                                                                                                                      Conceptually similar to @BenH's answer, but in C, so kudos where they are due (Welcome to PPCG, btw), but using recursion. It also uses array pointer arithmetic, because dirty code is shorter than clean code.



                                                                                                                      The function is tail recursive, with exit conditions if the first number can't eat the last or the length is 1, returning false or true, respectively. These values are found by dereferencing a pointer to the C-String (which gives a char) at the beginning and end of the string, and doing the comparisons on them. pointer arithmetic is done to find the end of the string. finally, the last char is "erased" by replacing it with a null terminator (0).



                                                                                                                      It's possible that the modulus arithmetic could be shortened by a byte or two, but I already need a shower after that pointer manipulation.



                                                                                                                      Ungolfed Version Here



                                                                                                                      Update: Saved two bytes by replacing c==1 with !c. This is essentially c == 0. It will run an additional time, and will needlessly double itself before deleting itself, but saves two bytes. A side effect is null or zero length strings won't cause infinite recursion (though we shouldn't get null strings as the exercise says positive integers).







                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                      edited Dec 8 at 4:48

























                                                                                                                      answered Dec 8 at 4:15









                                                                                                                      Andrew Baumher

                                                                                                                      1314




                                                                                                                      1314












                                                                                                                      • You do not need to link libraries in the case of gcc - although warnings will be generated, gcc will happily compile your code without #includes. Also, you could save 4 bytes with -DR=return. Finally, in your test code, the s are unnecessary, as the string literally already include them implicitly.
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago








                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                        Furthermore, you can return from a function by assigning to the first variable: b=case1?res1:case2?res2:res_else; is the same as if(case1)return res1;if(case2)return res2;return res_else;
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • Even further, you can shed some extra bytes by not using c: you can determine if the string is zero-length from head-tail.
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • 77 bytes
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • Didn't realize you could use ternary (conditional) operators in C. Has that always been the case? Regardless, good to know; I'll be using them in the future. Cheers
                                                                                                                        – Andrew Baumher
                                                                                                                        2 days ago


















                                                                                                                      • You do not need to link libraries in the case of gcc - although warnings will be generated, gcc will happily compile your code without #includes. Also, you could save 4 bytes with -DR=return. Finally, in your test code, the s are unnecessary, as the string literally already include them implicitly.
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago








                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                        Furthermore, you can return from a function by assigning to the first variable: b=case1?res1:case2?res2:res_else; is the same as if(case1)return res1;if(case2)return res2;return res_else;
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • Even further, you can shed some extra bytes by not using c: you can determine if the string is zero-length from head-tail.
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • 77 bytes
                                                                                                                        – Rogem
                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                      • Didn't realize you could use ternary (conditional) operators in C. Has that always been the case? Regardless, good to know; I'll be using them in the future. Cheers
                                                                                                                        – Andrew Baumher
                                                                                                                        2 days ago
















                                                                                                                      You do not need to link libraries in the case of gcc - although warnings will be generated, gcc will happily compile your code without #includes. Also, you could save 4 bytes with -DR=return. Finally, in your test code, the s are unnecessary, as the string literally already include them implicitly.
                                                                                                                      – Rogem
                                                                                                                      2 days ago






                                                                                                                      You do not need to link libraries in the case of gcc - although warnings will be generated, gcc will happily compile your code without #includes. Also, you could save 4 bytes with -DR=return. Finally, in your test code, the s are unnecessary, as the string literally already include them implicitly.
                                                                                                                      – Rogem
                                                                                                                      2 days ago






                                                                                                                      1




                                                                                                                      1




                                                                                                                      Furthermore, you can return from a function by assigning to the first variable: b=case1?res1:case2?res2:res_else; is the same as if(case1)return res1;if(case2)return res2;return res_else;
                                                                                                                      – Rogem
                                                                                                                      2 days ago




                                                                                                                      Furthermore, you can return from a function by assigning to the first variable: b=case1?res1:case2?res2:res_else; is the same as if(case1)return res1;if(case2)return res2;return res_else;
                                                                                                                      – Rogem
                                                                                                                      2 days ago












                                                                                                                      Even further, you can shed some extra bytes by not using c: you can determine if the string is zero-length from head-tail.
                                                                                                                      – Rogem
                                                                                                                      2 days ago




                                                                                                                      Even further, you can shed some extra bytes by not using c: you can determine if the string is zero-length from head-tail.
                                                                                                                      – Rogem
                                                                                                                      2 days ago












                                                                                                                      77 bytes
                                                                                                                      – Rogem
                                                                                                                      2 days ago




                                                                                                                      77 bytes
                                                                                                                      – Rogem
                                                                                                                      2 days ago












                                                                                                                      Didn't realize you could use ternary (conditional) operators in C. Has that always been the case? Regardless, good to know; I'll be using them in the future. Cheers
                                                                                                                      – Andrew Baumher
                                                                                                                      2 days ago




                                                                                                                      Didn't realize you could use ternary (conditional) operators in C. Has that always been the case? Regardless, good to know; I'll be using them in the future. Cheers
                                                                                                                      – Andrew Baumher
                                                                                                                      2 days ago










                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                      1
                                                                                                                      down vote













                                                                                                                      Powershell, 89 bytes





                                                                                                                      "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)'-or(($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3-and(.g(''+(+$m.1+$m.3)%10+$m.2)))


                                                                                                                      Important! The script calls itself recursively. So save the script as g.ps1 file in the current directory. Also you can call a script block variable instead script file (see the test script below). That calls has same length.



                                                                                                                      Note 1: The script uses a lazy evaluation of logic operators -or and -and. If "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)' is True then the right subexpression of -or is not evaluated. Also if ($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3 is False then the right subexpression of -and is not evaluated too. So we avoid infinite recursion.



                                                                                                                      Note 2: The regular expression '(.)(.*)(.)' does not contain start and end anchors because the expression (.*) is greedy by default.



                                                                                                                      Test script



                                                                                                                      $g={
                                                                                                                      "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)'-or(($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3-and(&$g(''+(+$m.1+$m.3)%10+$m.2)))
                                                                                                                      }

                                                                                                                      @(
                                                                                                                      ,(2632, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(92258, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(60282, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(38410, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(3210, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(2302, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(2742, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(8628, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(6793, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(1, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(2, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(10, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(100, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(55, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(121, $true)
                                                                                                                      ,(6724, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(47, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(472, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(60247, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(33265, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(79350, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(83147, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(93101, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(57088, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(69513, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(62738, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(54754, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(23931, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(7164, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(5289, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(3435, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(3949, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(8630, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(5018, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(6715, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(340, $false)
                                                                                                                      ,(2194, $false)
                                                                                                                      ) | %{
                                                                                                                      $n,$expected = $_
                                                                                                                      #$result = .g $n # uncomment this line to call a script file g.ps1
                                                                                                                      $result = &$g $n # uncomment this line to call a script block variable $g
                                                                                                                      # the script block call and the script file call has same length
                                                                                                                      "$($result-eq-$expected): $result <- $n"
                                                                                                                      }


                                                                                                                      Output:



                                                                                                                      True: True <- 2632
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 92258
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 60282
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 38410
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 3210
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 2302
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 2742
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 8628
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 6793
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 1
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 2
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 10
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 100
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 55
                                                                                                                      True: True <- 121
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 6724
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 47
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 472
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 60247
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 33265
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 79350
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 83147
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 93101
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 57088
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 69513
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 62738
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 54754
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 23931
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 7164
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 5289
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 3435
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 3949
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 8630
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 5018
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 6715
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 340
                                                                                                                      True: False <- 2194




                                                                                                                      Powershell, 90 bytes



                                                                                                                      No recursion. No file name dependency and no script block name dependency.



                                                                                                                      for($s="$args";$s[1]-and$s-ge$s%10){$s=''+(2+$s[0]+$s)%10+($s|% S*g 1($s.Length-2))}!$s[1]


                                                                                                                      A Powershell implicitly converts a right operand to a type of a left operand. Therefore, $s-ge$s%10 calculates right operand $s%10 as integer and compare it as a string because type of the left operand is string. And 2+$s[0]+$s converts a char $s[0] and string $s to integer because left operand 2 is integer.



                                                                                                                      $s|% S*g 1($s.Length-2) is a shortcut to $s.Substring(1,($s.Length-2))






                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer



























                                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                                        1
                                                                                                                        down vote













                                                                                                                        Powershell, 89 bytes





                                                                                                                        "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)'-or(($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3-and(.g(''+(+$m.1+$m.3)%10+$m.2)))


                                                                                                                        Important! The script calls itself recursively. So save the script as g.ps1 file in the current directory. Also you can call a script block variable instead script file (see the test script below). That calls has same length.



                                                                                                                        Note 1: The script uses a lazy evaluation of logic operators -or and -and. If "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)' is True then the right subexpression of -or is not evaluated. Also if ($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3 is False then the right subexpression of -and is not evaluated too. So we avoid infinite recursion.



                                                                                                                        Note 2: The regular expression '(.)(.*)(.)' does not contain start and end anchors because the expression (.*) is greedy by default.



                                                                                                                        Test script



                                                                                                                        $g={
                                                                                                                        "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)'-or(($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3-and(&$g(''+(+$m.1+$m.3)%10+$m.2)))
                                                                                                                        }

                                                                                                                        @(
                                                                                                                        ,(2632, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(92258, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(60282, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(38410, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(3210, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(2302, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(2742, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(8628, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(6793, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(1, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(2, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(10, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(100, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(55, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(121, $true)
                                                                                                                        ,(6724, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(47, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(472, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(60247, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(33265, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(79350, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(83147, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(93101, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(57088, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(69513, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(62738, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(54754, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(23931, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(7164, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(5289, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(3435, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(3949, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(8630, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(5018, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(6715, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(340, $false)
                                                                                                                        ,(2194, $false)
                                                                                                                        ) | %{
                                                                                                                        $n,$expected = $_
                                                                                                                        #$result = .g $n # uncomment this line to call a script file g.ps1
                                                                                                                        $result = &$g $n # uncomment this line to call a script block variable $g
                                                                                                                        # the script block call and the script file call has same length
                                                                                                                        "$($result-eq-$expected): $result <- $n"
                                                                                                                        }


                                                                                                                        Output:



                                                                                                                        True: True <- 2632
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 92258
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 60282
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 38410
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 3210
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 2302
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 2742
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 8628
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 6793
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 1
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 2
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 10
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 100
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 55
                                                                                                                        True: True <- 121
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 6724
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 47
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 472
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 60247
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 33265
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 79350
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 83147
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 93101
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 57088
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 69513
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 62738
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 54754
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 23931
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 7164
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 5289
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 3435
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 3949
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 8630
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 5018
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 6715
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 340
                                                                                                                        True: False <- 2194




                                                                                                                        Powershell, 90 bytes



                                                                                                                        No recursion. No file name dependency and no script block name dependency.



                                                                                                                        for($s="$args";$s[1]-and$s-ge$s%10){$s=''+(2+$s[0]+$s)%10+($s|% S*g 1($s.Length-2))}!$s[1]


                                                                                                                        A Powershell implicitly converts a right operand to a type of a left operand. Therefore, $s-ge$s%10 calculates right operand $s%10 as integer and compare it as a string because type of the left operand is string. And 2+$s[0]+$s converts a char $s[0] and string $s to integer because left operand 2 is integer.



                                                                                                                        $s|% S*g 1($s.Length-2) is a shortcut to $s.Substring(1,($s.Length-2))






                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                                          up vote
                                                                                                                          1
                                                                                                                          down vote










                                                                                                                          up vote
                                                                                                                          1
                                                                                                                          down vote









                                                                                                                          Powershell, 89 bytes





                                                                                                                          "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)'-or(($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3-and(.g(''+(+$m.1+$m.3)%10+$m.2)))


                                                                                                                          Important! The script calls itself recursively. So save the script as g.ps1 file in the current directory. Also you can call a script block variable instead script file (see the test script below). That calls has same length.



                                                                                                                          Note 1: The script uses a lazy evaluation of logic operators -or and -and. If "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)' is True then the right subexpression of -or is not evaluated. Also if ($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3 is False then the right subexpression of -and is not evaluated too. So we avoid infinite recursion.



                                                                                                                          Note 2: The regular expression '(.)(.*)(.)' does not contain start and end anchors because the expression (.*) is greedy by default.



                                                                                                                          Test script



                                                                                                                          $g={
                                                                                                                          "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)'-or(($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3-and(&$g(''+(+$m.1+$m.3)%10+$m.2)))
                                                                                                                          }

                                                                                                                          @(
                                                                                                                          ,(2632, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(92258, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(60282, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(38410, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(3210, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(2302, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(2742, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(8628, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(6793, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(1, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(2, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(10, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(100, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(55, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(121, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(6724, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(47, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(472, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(60247, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(33265, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(79350, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(83147, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(93101, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(57088, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(69513, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(62738, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(54754, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(23931, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(7164, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(5289, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(3435, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(3949, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(8630, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(5018, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(6715, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(340, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(2194, $false)
                                                                                                                          ) | %{
                                                                                                                          $n,$expected = $_
                                                                                                                          #$result = .g $n # uncomment this line to call a script file g.ps1
                                                                                                                          $result = &$g $n # uncomment this line to call a script block variable $g
                                                                                                                          # the script block call and the script file call has same length
                                                                                                                          "$($result-eq-$expected): $result <- $n"
                                                                                                                          }


                                                                                                                          Output:



                                                                                                                          True: True <- 2632
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 92258
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 60282
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 38410
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 3210
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 2302
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 2742
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 8628
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 6793
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 1
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 2
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 10
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 100
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 55
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 121
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 6724
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 47
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 472
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 60247
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 33265
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 79350
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 83147
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 93101
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 57088
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 69513
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 62738
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 54754
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 23931
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 7164
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 5289
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 3435
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 3949
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 8630
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 5018
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 6715
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 340
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 2194




                                                                                                                          Powershell, 90 bytes



                                                                                                                          No recursion. No file name dependency and no script block name dependency.



                                                                                                                          for($s="$args";$s[1]-and$s-ge$s%10){$s=''+(2+$s[0]+$s)%10+($s|% S*g 1($s.Length-2))}!$s[1]


                                                                                                                          A Powershell implicitly converts a right operand to a type of a left operand. Therefore, $s-ge$s%10 calculates right operand $s%10 as integer and compare it as a string because type of the left operand is string. And 2+$s[0]+$s converts a char $s[0] and string $s to integer because left operand 2 is integer.



                                                                                                                          $s|% S*g 1($s.Length-2) is a shortcut to $s.Substring(1,($s.Length-2))






                                                                                                                          share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                          Powershell, 89 bytes





                                                                                                                          "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)'-or(($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3-and(.g(''+(+$m.1+$m.3)%10+$m.2)))


                                                                                                                          Important! The script calls itself recursively. So save the script as g.ps1 file in the current directory. Also you can call a script block variable instead script file (see the test script below). That calls has same length.



                                                                                                                          Note 1: The script uses a lazy evaluation of logic operators -or and -and. If "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)' is True then the right subexpression of -or is not evaluated. Also if ($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3 is False then the right subexpression of -and is not evaluated too. So we avoid infinite recursion.



                                                                                                                          Note 2: The regular expression '(.)(.*)(.)' does not contain start and end anchors because the expression (.*) is greedy by default.



                                                                                                                          Test script



                                                                                                                          $g={
                                                                                                                          "$args"-notmatch'(.)(.*)(.)'-or(($m=$Matches).1-ge$m.3-and(&$g(''+(+$m.1+$m.3)%10+$m.2)))
                                                                                                                          }

                                                                                                                          @(
                                                                                                                          ,(2632, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(92258, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(60282, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(38410, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(3210, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(2302, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(2742, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(8628, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(6793, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(1, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(2, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(10, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(100, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(55, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(121, $true)
                                                                                                                          ,(6724, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(47, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(472, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(60247, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(33265, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(79350, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(83147, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(93101, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(57088, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(69513, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(62738, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(54754, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(23931, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(7164, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(5289, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(3435, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(3949, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(8630, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(5018, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(6715, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(340, $false)
                                                                                                                          ,(2194, $false)
                                                                                                                          ) | %{
                                                                                                                          $n,$expected = $_
                                                                                                                          #$result = .g $n # uncomment this line to call a script file g.ps1
                                                                                                                          $result = &$g $n # uncomment this line to call a script block variable $g
                                                                                                                          # the script block call and the script file call has same length
                                                                                                                          "$($result-eq-$expected): $result <- $n"
                                                                                                                          }


                                                                                                                          Output:



                                                                                                                          True: True <- 2632
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 92258
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 60282
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 38410
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 3210
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 2302
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 2742
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 8628
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 6793
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 1
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 2
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 10
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 100
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 55
                                                                                                                          True: True <- 121
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 6724
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 47
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 472
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 60247
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 33265
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 79350
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 83147
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 93101
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 57088
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 69513
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 62738
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 54754
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 23931
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 7164
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 5289
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 3435
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 3949
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 8630
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 5018
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 6715
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 340
                                                                                                                          True: False <- 2194




                                                                                                                          Powershell, 90 bytes



                                                                                                                          No recursion. No file name dependency and no script block name dependency.



                                                                                                                          for($s="$args";$s[1]-and$s-ge$s%10){$s=''+(2+$s[0]+$s)%10+($s|% S*g 1($s.Length-2))}!$s[1]


                                                                                                                          A Powershell implicitly converts a right operand to a type of a left operand. Therefore, $s-ge$s%10 calculates right operand $s%10 as integer and compare it as a string because type of the left operand is string. And 2+$s[0]+$s converts a char $s[0] and string $s to integer because left operand 2 is integer.



                                                                                                                          $s|% S*g 1($s.Length-2) is a shortcut to $s.Substring(1,($s.Length-2))







                                                                                                                          share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                          share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                          edited 2 days ago

























                                                                                                                          answered 2 days ago









                                                                                                                          mazzy

                                                                                                                          1,947313




                                                                                                                          1,947313






















                                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                                              down vote














                                                                                                                              C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 69 bytes





                                                                                                                              x=>{for(int h=x[0],i=x.Length;i>1;)h=h<x[--i]?h/0:48+(h+x[i]-96)%10;}


                                                                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                                                                              Success or failure is determined by presence or absence of an exception. Input is in the form of a string.



                                                                                                                              Less golfed...



                                                                                                                              // x is the input as a string
                                                                                                                              x=>{
                                                                                                                              // h is the head
                                                                                                                              for(int h=x[0],
                                                                                                                              // i is an index to the tail
                                                                                                                              i=x.Length;
                                                                                                                              // continue until the tail is at 0
                                                                                                                              i>1;)
                                                                                                                              // is head smaller larger than tail?
                                                                                                                              h=h<x[--i]
                                                                                                                              // throw an exception
                                                                                                                              ?h/0
                                                                                                                              // calculate the next head
                                                                                                                              :48+(h+x[i]-96)%10;
                                                                                                                              }


                                                                                                                              There are a couple extra bytes to deal with converting between characters and digits, but overall that didn't affect the size too much.






                                                                                                                              share|improve this answer



























                                                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                                                1
                                                                                                                                down vote














                                                                                                                                C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 69 bytes





                                                                                                                                x=>{for(int h=x[0],i=x.Length;i>1;)h=h<x[--i]?h/0:48+(h+x[i]-96)%10;}


                                                                                                                                Try it online!



                                                                                                                                Success or failure is determined by presence or absence of an exception. Input is in the form of a string.



                                                                                                                                Less golfed...



                                                                                                                                // x is the input as a string
                                                                                                                                x=>{
                                                                                                                                // h is the head
                                                                                                                                for(int h=x[0],
                                                                                                                                // i is an index to the tail
                                                                                                                                i=x.Length;
                                                                                                                                // continue until the tail is at 0
                                                                                                                                i>1;)
                                                                                                                                // is head smaller larger than tail?
                                                                                                                                h=h<x[--i]
                                                                                                                                // throw an exception
                                                                                                                                ?h/0
                                                                                                                                // calculate the next head
                                                                                                                                :48+(h+x[i]-96)%10;
                                                                                                                                }


                                                                                                                                There are a couple extra bytes to deal with converting between characters and digits, but overall that didn't affect the size too much.






                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                                                  up vote
                                                                                                                                  1
                                                                                                                                  down vote










                                                                                                                                  up vote
                                                                                                                                  1
                                                                                                                                  down vote










                                                                                                                                  C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 69 bytes





                                                                                                                                  x=>{for(int h=x[0],i=x.Length;i>1;)h=h<x[--i]?h/0:48+(h+x[i]-96)%10;}


                                                                                                                                  Try it online!



                                                                                                                                  Success or failure is determined by presence or absence of an exception. Input is in the form of a string.



                                                                                                                                  Less golfed...



                                                                                                                                  // x is the input as a string
                                                                                                                                  x=>{
                                                                                                                                  // h is the head
                                                                                                                                  for(int h=x[0],
                                                                                                                                  // i is an index to the tail
                                                                                                                                  i=x.Length;
                                                                                                                                  // continue until the tail is at 0
                                                                                                                                  i>1;)
                                                                                                                                  // is head smaller larger than tail?
                                                                                                                                  h=h<x[--i]
                                                                                                                                  // throw an exception
                                                                                                                                  ?h/0
                                                                                                                                  // calculate the next head
                                                                                                                                  :48+(h+x[i]-96)%10;
                                                                                                                                  }


                                                                                                                                  There are a couple extra bytes to deal with converting between characters and digits, but overall that didn't affect the size too much.






                                                                                                                                  share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                                  C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 69 bytes





                                                                                                                                  x=>{for(int h=x[0],i=x.Length;i>1;)h=h<x[--i]?h/0:48+(h+x[i]-96)%10;}


                                                                                                                                  Try it online!



                                                                                                                                  Success or failure is determined by presence or absence of an exception. Input is in the form of a string.



                                                                                                                                  Less golfed...



                                                                                                                                  // x is the input as a string
                                                                                                                                  x=>{
                                                                                                                                  // h is the head
                                                                                                                                  for(int h=x[0],
                                                                                                                                  // i is an index to the tail
                                                                                                                                  i=x.Length;
                                                                                                                                  // continue until the tail is at 0
                                                                                                                                  i>1;)
                                                                                                                                  // is head smaller larger than tail?
                                                                                                                                  h=h<x[--i]
                                                                                                                                  // throw an exception
                                                                                                                                  ?h/0
                                                                                                                                  // calculate the next head
                                                                                                                                  :48+(h+x[i]-96)%10;
                                                                                                                                  }


                                                                                                                                  There are a couple extra bytes to deal with converting between characters and digits, but overall that didn't affect the size too much.







                                                                                                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                                  edited 8 hours ago

























                                                                                                                                  answered 2 days ago









                                                                                                                                  dana

                                                                                                                                  30124




                                                                                                                                  30124






















                                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                                                                      PowerShell, 94 91 bytes





                                                                                                                                      for(;$n-and$n[0]-ge$n[-1]){$n=$n-replace"^.",((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)-replace".$"}return !$n


                                                                                                                                      Try it online!





                                                                                                                                      Test Script



                                                                                                                                      function f($n){

                                                                                                                                      for(;$n-and$n[0]-ge$n[-1]){$n=$n-replace"^.",((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)-replace".$"}return !$n

                                                                                                                                      Remove-Variable n
                                                                                                                                      }
                                                                                                                                      Write-Host True values:
                                                                                                                                      @(2632, 92258, 60282, 38410,3210, 2302, 2742, 8628, 6793, 1, 2, 10, 100, 55, 121) |
                                                                                                                                      % { Write-Host " $_ $(' '*(6-$_.ToString().Length)) $(f $_.ToString())" }

                                                                                                                                      Write-Host False values:
                                                                                                                                      @(6724, 47, 472, 60247, 33265, 79350, 83147, 93101, 57088, 69513, 62738, 54754, 23931, 7164, 5289, 3435, 3949, 8630, 5018, 6715, 340, 2194) |
                                                                                                                                      % { Write-Host " $_ $(' '*(6-$_.ToString().Length)) $(f $_.ToString())" }


                                                                                                                                      Ungolfed code:



                                                                                                                                      function f ($inVar){
                                                                                                                                      # While the Input exists, and the first character is greater than last
                                                                                                                                      while($inVar -and ($inVar[0] -ge $inVar[-1])){

                                                                                                                                      # Calculate the first integer -> ((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)
                                                                                                                                      $summationChars = [int]$inVar[0]+ [int]$inVar[-1]
                                                                                                                                      # $summationChars adds the ascii values, not the integer literals.
                                                                                                                                      $summationResult = $summationChars - 48*2
                                                                                                                                      $summationModulo = $summationResult % 10

                                                                                                                                      # Replace first character with the modulo
                                                                                                                                      $inVar = $inVar -replace "^.", $summationModulo

                                                                                                                                      # Remove last character
                                                                                                                                      $inVar = $inVar -replace ".$"
                                                                                                                                      }
                                                                                                                                      # Either it doesn't exist (Returns $True), or
                                                                                                                                      # it exists since $inVar[0] < $inVar[-1] returning $False
                                                                                                                                      return !$inVar
                                                                                                                                      }





                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer



















                                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                                        You shouldn't need to check $n[0] in your for statement -- just checking $n should be enough.
                                                                                                                                        – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                                                                        Dec 7 at 19:16










                                                                                                                                      • You could to use -6 instead -96 because it is enough to calc %10
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                                      • you could remove return and save 7 bytes
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                                      • and I think you should include a parameter declaration to the bytes count. either param($n) or function f($n).
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago






                                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                                        @mazzy The poster stated in the comments that you were allowed to use strings, you just weren't allowed to give the input as a list of numbers/strings. I interpreted this as ["1","2","3"] isn't valid input but "123"is. if @VedantKandoi has an issue with it I can definitely change it!
                                                                                                                                        – KGlasier
                                                                                                                                        15 hours ago















                                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                                                                      PowerShell, 94 91 bytes





                                                                                                                                      for(;$n-and$n[0]-ge$n[-1]){$n=$n-replace"^.",((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)-replace".$"}return !$n


                                                                                                                                      Try it online!





                                                                                                                                      Test Script



                                                                                                                                      function f($n){

                                                                                                                                      for(;$n-and$n[0]-ge$n[-1]){$n=$n-replace"^.",((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)-replace".$"}return !$n

                                                                                                                                      Remove-Variable n
                                                                                                                                      }
                                                                                                                                      Write-Host True values:
                                                                                                                                      @(2632, 92258, 60282, 38410,3210, 2302, 2742, 8628, 6793, 1, 2, 10, 100, 55, 121) |
                                                                                                                                      % { Write-Host " $_ $(' '*(6-$_.ToString().Length)) $(f $_.ToString())" }

                                                                                                                                      Write-Host False values:
                                                                                                                                      @(6724, 47, 472, 60247, 33265, 79350, 83147, 93101, 57088, 69513, 62738, 54754, 23931, 7164, 5289, 3435, 3949, 8630, 5018, 6715, 340, 2194) |
                                                                                                                                      % { Write-Host " $_ $(' '*(6-$_.ToString().Length)) $(f $_.ToString())" }


                                                                                                                                      Ungolfed code:



                                                                                                                                      function f ($inVar){
                                                                                                                                      # While the Input exists, and the first character is greater than last
                                                                                                                                      while($inVar -and ($inVar[0] -ge $inVar[-1])){

                                                                                                                                      # Calculate the first integer -> ((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)
                                                                                                                                      $summationChars = [int]$inVar[0]+ [int]$inVar[-1]
                                                                                                                                      # $summationChars adds the ascii values, not the integer literals.
                                                                                                                                      $summationResult = $summationChars - 48*2
                                                                                                                                      $summationModulo = $summationResult % 10

                                                                                                                                      # Replace first character with the modulo
                                                                                                                                      $inVar = $inVar -replace "^.", $summationModulo

                                                                                                                                      # Remove last character
                                                                                                                                      $inVar = $inVar -replace ".$"
                                                                                                                                      }
                                                                                                                                      # Either it doesn't exist (Returns $True), or
                                                                                                                                      # it exists since $inVar[0] < $inVar[-1] returning $False
                                                                                                                                      return !$inVar
                                                                                                                                      }





                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer



















                                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                                        You shouldn't need to check $n[0] in your for statement -- just checking $n should be enough.
                                                                                                                                        – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                                                                        Dec 7 at 19:16










                                                                                                                                      • You could to use -6 instead -96 because it is enough to calc %10
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                                      • you could remove return and save 7 bytes
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                                      • and I think you should include a parameter declaration to the bytes count. either param($n) or function f($n).
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago






                                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                                        @mazzy The poster stated in the comments that you were allowed to use strings, you just weren't allowed to give the input as a list of numbers/strings. I interpreted this as ["1","2","3"] isn't valid input but "123"is. if @VedantKandoi has an issue with it I can definitely change it!
                                                                                                                                        – KGlasier
                                                                                                                                        15 hours ago













                                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                                      down vote










                                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                                      down vote










                                                                                                                                      PowerShell, 94 91 bytes





                                                                                                                                      for(;$n-and$n[0]-ge$n[-1]){$n=$n-replace"^.",((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)-replace".$"}return !$n


                                                                                                                                      Try it online!





                                                                                                                                      Test Script



                                                                                                                                      function f($n){

                                                                                                                                      for(;$n-and$n[0]-ge$n[-1]){$n=$n-replace"^.",((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)-replace".$"}return !$n

                                                                                                                                      Remove-Variable n
                                                                                                                                      }
                                                                                                                                      Write-Host True values:
                                                                                                                                      @(2632, 92258, 60282, 38410,3210, 2302, 2742, 8628, 6793, 1, 2, 10, 100, 55, 121) |
                                                                                                                                      % { Write-Host " $_ $(' '*(6-$_.ToString().Length)) $(f $_.ToString())" }

                                                                                                                                      Write-Host False values:
                                                                                                                                      @(6724, 47, 472, 60247, 33265, 79350, 83147, 93101, 57088, 69513, 62738, 54754, 23931, 7164, 5289, 3435, 3949, 8630, 5018, 6715, 340, 2194) |
                                                                                                                                      % { Write-Host " $_ $(' '*(6-$_.ToString().Length)) $(f $_.ToString())" }


                                                                                                                                      Ungolfed code:



                                                                                                                                      function f ($inVar){
                                                                                                                                      # While the Input exists, and the first character is greater than last
                                                                                                                                      while($inVar -and ($inVar[0] -ge $inVar[-1])){

                                                                                                                                      # Calculate the first integer -> ((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)
                                                                                                                                      $summationChars = [int]$inVar[0]+ [int]$inVar[-1]
                                                                                                                                      # $summationChars adds the ascii values, not the integer literals.
                                                                                                                                      $summationResult = $summationChars - 48*2
                                                                                                                                      $summationModulo = $summationResult % 10

                                                                                                                                      # Replace first character with the modulo
                                                                                                                                      $inVar = $inVar -replace "^.", $summationModulo

                                                                                                                                      # Remove last character
                                                                                                                                      $inVar = $inVar -replace ".$"
                                                                                                                                      }
                                                                                                                                      # Either it doesn't exist (Returns $True), or
                                                                                                                                      # it exists since $inVar[0] < $inVar[-1] returning $False
                                                                                                                                      return !$inVar
                                                                                                                                      }





                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                                      PowerShell, 94 91 bytes





                                                                                                                                      for(;$n-and$n[0]-ge$n[-1]){$n=$n-replace"^.",((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)-replace".$"}return !$n


                                                                                                                                      Try it online!





                                                                                                                                      Test Script



                                                                                                                                      function f($n){

                                                                                                                                      for(;$n-and$n[0]-ge$n[-1]){$n=$n-replace"^.",((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)-replace".$"}return !$n

                                                                                                                                      Remove-Variable n
                                                                                                                                      }
                                                                                                                                      Write-Host True values:
                                                                                                                                      @(2632, 92258, 60282, 38410,3210, 2302, 2742, 8628, 6793, 1, 2, 10, 100, 55, 121) |
                                                                                                                                      % { Write-Host " $_ $(' '*(6-$_.ToString().Length)) $(f $_.ToString())" }

                                                                                                                                      Write-Host False values:
                                                                                                                                      @(6724, 47, 472, 60247, 33265, 79350, 83147, 93101, 57088, 69513, 62738, 54754, 23931, 7164, 5289, 3435, 3949, 8630, 5018, 6715, 340, 2194) |
                                                                                                                                      % { Write-Host " $_ $(' '*(6-$_.ToString().Length)) $(f $_.ToString())" }


                                                                                                                                      Ungolfed code:



                                                                                                                                      function f ($inVar){
                                                                                                                                      # While the Input exists, and the first character is greater than last
                                                                                                                                      while($inVar -and ($inVar[0] -ge $inVar[-1])){

                                                                                                                                      # Calculate the first integer -> ((+$n[0]+$n[-1]-96)%10)
                                                                                                                                      $summationChars = [int]$inVar[0]+ [int]$inVar[-1]
                                                                                                                                      # $summationChars adds the ascii values, not the integer literals.
                                                                                                                                      $summationResult = $summationChars - 48*2
                                                                                                                                      $summationModulo = $summationResult % 10

                                                                                                                                      # Replace first character with the modulo
                                                                                                                                      $inVar = $inVar -replace "^.", $summationModulo

                                                                                                                                      # Remove last character
                                                                                                                                      $inVar = $inVar -replace ".$"
                                                                                                                                      }
                                                                                                                                      # Either it doesn't exist (Returns $True), or
                                                                                                                                      # it exists since $inVar[0] < $inVar[-1] returning $False
                                                                                                                                      return !$inVar
                                                                                                                                      }






                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                                      edited Dec 7 at 19:42

























                                                                                                                                      answered Dec 7 at 17:15









                                                                                                                                      KGlasier

                                                                                                                                      1315




                                                                                                                                      1315








                                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                                        You shouldn't need to check $n[0] in your for statement -- just checking $n should be enough.
                                                                                                                                        – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                                                                        Dec 7 at 19:16










                                                                                                                                      • You could to use -6 instead -96 because it is enough to calc %10
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                                      • you could remove return and save 7 bytes
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                                      • and I think you should include a parameter declaration to the bytes count. either param($n) or function f($n).
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago






                                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                                        @mazzy The poster stated in the comments that you were allowed to use strings, you just weren't allowed to give the input as a list of numbers/strings. I interpreted this as ["1","2","3"] isn't valid input but "123"is. if @VedantKandoi has an issue with it I can definitely change it!
                                                                                                                                        – KGlasier
                                                                                                                                        15 hours ago














                                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                                        You shouldn't need to check $n[0] in your for statement -- just checking $n should be enough.
                                                                                                                                        – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                                                                        Dec 7 at 19:16










                                                                                                                                      • You could to use -6 instead -96 because it is enough to calc %10
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                                      • you could remove return and save 7 bytes
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago










                                                                                                                                      • and I think you should include a parameter declaration to the bytes count. either param($n) or function f($n).
                                                                                                                                        – mazzy
                                                                                                                                        2 days ago






                                                                                                                                      • 1




                                                                                                                                        @mazzy The poster stated in the comments that you were allowed to use strings, you just weren't allowed to give the input as a list of numbers/strings. I interpreted this as ["1","2","3"] isn't valid input but "123"is. if @VedantKandoi has an issue with it I can definitely change it!
                                                                                                                                        – KGlasier
                                                                                                                                        15 hours ago








                                                                                                                                      1




                                                                                                                                      1




                                                                                                                                      You shouldn't need to check $n[0] in your for statement -- just checking $n should be enough.
                                                                                                                                      – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                                                                      Dec 7 at 19:16




                                                                                                                                      You shouldn't need to check $n[0] in your for statement -- just checking $n should be enough.
                                                                                                                                      – AdmBorkBork
                                                                                                                                      Dec 7 at 19:16












                                                                                                                                      You could to use -6 instead -96 because it is enough to calc %10
                                                                                                                                      – mazzy
                                                                                                                                      2 days ago




                                                                                                                                      You could to use -6 instead -96 because it is enough to calc %10
                                                                                                                                      – mazzy
                                                                                                                                      2 days ago












                                                                                                                                      you could remove return and save 7 bytes
                                                                                                                                      – mazzy
                                                                                                                                      2 days ago




                                                                                                                                      you could remove return and save 7 bytes
                                                                                                                                      – mazzy
                                                                                                                                      2 days ago












                                                                                                                                      and I think you should include a parameter declaration to the bytes count. either param($n) or function f($n).
                                                                                                                                      – mazzy
                                                                                                                                      2 days ago




                                                                                                                                      and I think you should include a parameter declaration to the bytes count. either param($n) or function f($n).
                                                                                                                                      – mazzy
                                                                                                                                      2 days ago




                                                                                                                                      1




                                                                                                                                      1




                                                                                                                                      @mazzy The poster stated in the comments that you were allowed to use strings, you just weren't allowed to give the input as a list of numbers/strings. I interpreted this as ["1","2","3"] isn't valid input but "123"is. if @VedantKandoi has an issue with it I can definitely change it!
                                                                                                                                      – KGlasier
                                                                                                                                      15 hours ago




                                                                                                                                      @mazzy The poster stated in the comments that you were allowed to use strings, you just weren't allowed to give the input as a list of numbers/strings. I interpreted this as ["1","2","3"] isn't valid input but "123"is. if @VedantKandoi has an issue with it I can definitely change it!
                                                                                                                                      – KGlasier
                                                                                                                                      15 hours ago










                                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                                                                      Perl 5 -pF, 53 bytes





                                                                                                                                      $F[0]=($F[0]+pop@F)%10while$#F&&$F[0]>=$F[-1];$_=!$#F


                                                                                                                                      Try it online!






                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                                                        down vote














                                                                                                                                        Perl 5 -pF, 53 bytes





                                                                                                                                        $F[0]=($F[0]+pop@F)%10while$#F&&$F[0]>=$F[-1];$_=!$#F


                                                                                                                                        Try it online!






                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                          up vote
                                                                                                                                          0
                                                                                                                                          down vote










                                                                                                                                          up vote
                                                                                                                                          0
                                                                                                                                          down vote










                                                                                                                                          Perl 5 -pF, 53 bytes





                                                                                                                                          $F[0]=($F[0]+pop@F)%10while$#F&&$F[0]>=$F[-1];$_=!$#F


                                                                                                                                          Try it online!






                                                                                                                                          share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                                          Perl 5 -pF, 53 bytes





                                                                                                                                          $F[0]=($F[0]+pop@F)%10while$#F&&$F[0]>=$F[-1];$_=!$#F


                                                                                                                                          Try it online!







                                                                                                                                          share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                          share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                                          answered 3 hours ago









                                                                                                                                          Xcali

                                                                                                                                          5,029520




                                                                                                                                          5,029520






























                                                                                                                                              draft saved

                                                                                                                                              draft discarded




















































                                                                                                                                              If this is an answer to a challenge…




                                                                                                                                              • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                                                                                                                                              • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                                                                                                                                                Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                                                                                                                                              • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                                                                                                                                              More generally…




                                                                                                                                              • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                                                                                                                                              • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).






                                                                                                                                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                                                                                                                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                                                                                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                                                                                                              But avoid



                                                                                                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                                                                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                                                                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                                                                                                              draft saved


                                                                                                                                              draft discarded














                                                                                                                                              StackExchange.ready(
                                                                                                                                              function () {
                                                                                                                                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f177118%2fnumber-that-can-eat-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                                                                                                              }
                                                                                                                                              );

                                                                                                                                              Post as a guest















                                                                                                                                              Required, but never shown





















































                                                                                                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                                                                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                                                                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                                                                                                              Required, but never shown

































                                                                                                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                                                                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                                                                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                                                                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                                                                                                              Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                                                                              "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                                                                                                                                              Alcedinidae

                                                                                                                                              Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?