How to share two numpy arrays as shared memory and make execution faster












0















I have to run least-square on each row of a numpy array. I am using sciki-learn joblib module for parallel processing. But unfortunately I am not getting the performance gain I am hoping for. I think, it might be because of static matrices being copied again and again. Below is my code snippet. How can I make it faster ?



A sample code (this is just an example). My arrays are of size 50k*10k



from sklearn.externals.joblib import Parallel,delayed
from numpy.linalg import norm,lstsq
V = np.random.rand(5,5)
W = np.random.randint(0,2,(5,5))
for i in xrange(1,max_iter+1):
U = Parallel(n_jobs=-1)(delayed(lstsq)(np.dot(V,np.diag(Wu)), np.dot(V[u],np.diag(Wu)),rcond=None) for u,Wu in enumerate(W))


Both V and W remains constant for each row operation. I was hoping that sklearn automatically makes it a shared object between parallel threads/process.










share|improve this question



























    0















    I have to run least-square on each row of a numpy array. I am using sciki-learn joblib module for parallel processing. But unfortunately I am not getting the performance gain I am hoping for. I think, it might be because of static matrices being copied again and again. Below is my code snippet. How can I make it faster ?



    A sample code (this is just an example). My arrays are of size 50k*10k



    from sklearn.externals.joblib import Parallel,delayed
    from numpy.linalg import norm,lstsq
    V = np.random.rand(5,5)
    W = np.random.randint(0,2,(5,5))
    for i in xrange(1,max_iter+1):
    U = Parallel(n_jobs=-1)(delayed(lstsq)(np.dot(V,np.diag(Wu)), np.dot(V[u],np.diag(Wu)),rcond=None) for u,Wu in enumerate(W))


    Both V and W remains constant for each row operation. I was hoping that sklearn automatically makes it a shared object between parallel threads/process.










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I have to run least-square on each row of a numpy array. I am using sciki-learn joblib module for parallel processing. But unfortunately I am not getting the performance gain I am hoping for. I think, it might be because of static matrices being copied again and again. Below is my code snippet. How can I make it faster ?



      A sample code (this is just an example). My arrays are of size 50k*10k



      from sklearn.externals.joblib import Parallel,delayed
      from numpy.linalg import norm,lstsq
      V = np.random.rand(5,5)
      W = np.random.randint(0,2,(5,5))
      for i in xrange(1,max_iter+1):
      U = Parallel(n_jobs=-1)(delayed(lstsq)(np.dot(V,np.diag(Wu)), np.dot(V[u],np.diag(Wu)),rcond=None) for u,Wu in enumerate(W))


      Both V and W remains constant for each row operation. I was hoping that sklearn automatically makes it a shared object between parallel threads/process.










      share|improve this question














      I have to run least-square on each row of a numpy array. I am using sciki-learn joblib module for parallel processing. But unfortunately I am not getting the performance gain I am hoping for. I think, it might be because of static matrices being copied again and again. Below is my code snippet. How can I make it faster ?



      A sample code (this is just an example). My arrays are of size 50k*10k



      from sklearn.externals.joblib import Parallel,delayed
      from numpy.linalg import norm,lstsq
      V = np.random.rand(5,5)
      W = np.random.randint(0,2,(5,5))
      for i in xrange(1,max_iter+1):
      U = Parallel(n_jobs=-1)(delayed(lstsq)(np.dot(V,np.diag(Wu)), np.dot(V[u],np.diag(Wu)),rcond=None) for u,Wu in enumerate(W))


      Both V and W remains constant for each row operation. I was hoping that sklearn automatically makes it a shared object between parallel threads/process.







      python-2.7 parallel-processing scikit-learn






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 21 '18 at 8:44









      ShewShew

      5101516




      5101516
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53408181%2fhow-to-share-two-numpy-arrays-as-shared-memory-and-make-execution-faster%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53408181%2fhow-to-share-two-numpy-arrays-as-shared-memory-and-make-execution-faster%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown