Words for Technology enthusiastic
I would like to fill in the space in the following sentence a proper word that means Technology enthusiastic
With an inquisitive and ___ personality, I am confident ...
I've tried couple synonyms from here but all seem out of place.
single-word-requests
add a comment |
I would like to fill in the space in the following sentence a proper word that means Technology enthusiastic
With an inquisitive and ___ personality, I am confident ...
I've tried couple synonyms from here but all seem out of place.
single-word-requests
1
I think the problem is that a personality is not generally considered to be tech savvy. You may be, but your personality isn’t.
– Jim
Jan 7 at 2:25
2
What's wrong with technophilic?
– Hot Licks
Jan 7 at 2:37
+1 for the research.
– Kris
2 days ago
The linked question offers only nouns, which aren't always easy to make into adjectives. However, it would be useful to say what the adjectives you form are, and why they "seem out of place". Help for this sort of question
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
@HotLicks I also like technophilic (+1). It's more accurate and inclusive than tech-savvy because the latter term implies knowledge and skill whereas the former only implies enthusiasm. It's a bit like the difference between being a music lover and a musician.
– BoldBen
2 days ago
add a comment |
I would like to fill in the space in the following sentence a proper word that means Technology enthusiastic
With an inquisitive and ___ personality, I am confident ...
I've tried couple synonyms from here but all seem out of place.
single-word-requests
I would like to fill in the space in the following sentence a proper word that means Technology enthusiastic
With an inquisitive and ___ personality, I am confident ...
I've tried couple synonyms from here but all seem out of place.
single-word-requests
single-word-requests
asked Jan 7 at 2:20
LodLod
63
63
1
I think the problem is that a personality is not generally considered to be tech savvy. You may be, but your personality isn’t.
– Jim
Jan 7 at 2:25
2
What's wrong with technophilic?
– Hot Licks
Jan 7 at 2:37
+1 for the research.
– Kris
2 days ago
The linked question offers only nouns, which aren't always easy to make into adjectives. However, it would be useful to say what the adjectives you form are, and why they "seem out of place". Help for this sort of question
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
@HotLicks I also like technophilic (+1). It's more accurate and inclusive than tech-savvy because the latter term implies knowledge and skill whereas the former only implies enthusiasm. It's a bit like the difference between being a music lover and a musician.
– BoldBen
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
I think the problem is that a personality is not generally considered to be tech savvy. You may be, but your personality isn’t.
– Jim
Jan 7 at 2:25
2
What's wrong with technophilic?
– Hot Licks
Jan 7 at 2:37
+1 for the research.
– Kris
2 days ago
The linked question offers only nouns, which aren't always easy to make into adjectives. However, it would be useful to say what the adjectives you form are, and why they "seem out of place". Help for this sort of question
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
@HotLicks I also like technophilic (+1). It's more accurate and inclusive than tech-savvy because the latter term implies knowledge and skill whereas the former only implies enthusiasm. It's a bit like the difference between being a music lover and a musician.
– BoldBen
2 days ago
1
1
I think the problem is that a personality is not generally considered to be tech savvy. You may be, but your personality isn’t.
– Jim
Jan 7 at 2:25
I think the problem is that a personality is not generally considered to be tech savvy. You may be, but your personality isn’t.
– Jim
Jan 7 at 2:25
2
2
What's wrong with technophilic?
– Hot Licks
Jan 7 at 2:37
What's wrong with technophilic?
– Hot Licks
Jan 7 at 2:37
+1 for the research.
– Kris
2 days ago
+1 for the research.
– Kris
2 days ago
The linked question offers only nouns, which aren't always easy to make into adjectives. However, it would be useful to say what the adjectives you form are, and why they "seem out of place". Help for this sort of question
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
The linked question offers only nouns, which aren't always easy to make into adjectives. However, it would be useful to say what the adjectives you form are, and why they "seem out of place". Help for this sort of question
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
@HotLicks I also like technophilic (+1). It's more accurate and inclusive than tech-savvy because the latter term implies knowledge and skill whereas the former only implies enthusiasm. It's a bit like the difference between being a music lover and a musician.
– BoldBen
2 days ago
@HotLicks I also like technophilic (+1). It's more accurate and inclusive than tech-savvy because the latter term implies knowledge and skill whereas the former only implies enthusiasm. It's a bit like the difference between being a music lover and a musician.
– BoldBen
2 days ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480160%2fwords-for-technology-enthusiastic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480160%2fwords-for-technology-enthusiastic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I think the problem is that a personality is not generally considered to be tech savvy. You may be, but your personality isn’t.
– Jim
Jan 7 at 2:25
2
What's wrong with technophilic?
– Hot Licks
Jan 7 at 2:37
+1 for the research.
– Kris
2 days ago
The linked question offers only nouns, which aren't always easy to make into adjectives. However, it would be useful to say what the adjectives you form are, and why they "seem out of place". Help for this sort of question
– Andrew Leach♦
2 days ago
@HotLicks I also like technophilic (+1). It's more accurate and inclusive than tech-savvy because the latter term implies knowledge and skill whereas the former only implies enthusiasm. It's a bit like the difference between being a music lover and a musician.
– BoldBen
2 days ago