How to properly format a list of verbs with an ambiguous object?












0















Is there ambiguity in the following sentence?



"You will not support, display, or show favor for the drinking of water."



I understand it as "You will not support the drinking of water, You will not display the drinking of water, You will not show favor for the drinking of water.".



But could one understand it as, "You will not support water, you will not display water, or you will not show favor for the drinking of water." correct?



I know it's an odd example. Is there a correct, preferred, or "more correct" understanding of the sentence?










share|improve this question







New contributor




James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    In print, it's ambiguous. But spoken, the intonation and rhythm would distinguish and clarify the significant constituents and their boundaries. You will not [[support, display, or show favor for] [the drinking of water]]. All written English sentences are multiply ambiguous; it is only by constant training and excluding unlikely parses that we can manage to read at all, since so much of the language is not conveyed by the orthography.

    – John Lawler
    3 hours ago
















0















Is there ambiguity in the following sentence?



"You will not support, display, or show favor for the drinking of water."



I understand it as "You will not support the drinking of water, You will not display the drinking of water, You will not show favor for the drinking of water.".



But could one understand it as, "You will not support water, you will not display water, or you will not show favor for the drinking of water." correct?



I know it's an odd example. Is there a correct, preferred, or "more correct" understanding of the sentence?










share|improve this question







New contributor




James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    In print, it's ambiguous. But spoken, the intonation and rhythm would distinguish and clarify the significant constituents and their boundaries. You will not [[support, display, or show favor for] [the drinking of water]]. All written English sentences are multiply ambiguous; it is only by constant training and excluding unlikely parses that we can manage to read at all, since so much of the language is not conveyed by the orthography.

    – John Lawler
    3 hours ago














0












0








0








Is there ambiguity in the following sentence?



"You will not support, display, or show favor for the drinking of water."



I understand it as "You will not support the drinking of water, You will not display the drinking of water, You will not show favor for the drinking of water.".



But could one understand it as, "You will not support water, you will not display water, or you will not show favor for the drinking of water." correct?



I know it's an odd example. Is there a correct, preferred, or "more correct" understanding of the sentence?










share|improve this question







New contributor




James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Is there ambiguity in the following sentence?



"You will not support, display, or show favor for the drinking of water."



I understand it as "You will not support the drinking of water, You will not display the drinking of water, You will not show favor for the drinking of water.".



But could one understand it as, "You will not support water, you will not display water, or you will not show favor for the drinking of water." correct?



I know it's an odd example. Is there a correct, preferred, or "more correct" understanding of the sentence?







verbs commas sentence lists






share|improve this question







New contributor




James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









JamesJames

1




1




New contributor




James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2





    In print, it's ambiguous. But spoken, the intonation and rhythm would distinguish and clarify the significant constituents and their boundaries. You will not [[support, display, or show favor for] [the drinking of water]]. All written English sentences are multiply ambiguous; it is only by constant training and excluding unlikely parses that we can manage to read at all, since so much of the language is not conveyed by the orthography.

    – John Lawler
    3 hours ago














  • 2





    In print, it's ambiguous. But spoken, the intonation and rhythm would distinguish and clarify the significant constituents and their boundaries. You will not [[support, display, or show favor for] [the drinking of water]]. All written English sentences are multiply ambiguous; it is only by constant training and excluding unlikely parses that we can manage to read at all, since so much of the language is not conveyed by the orthography.

    – John Lawler
    3 hours ago








2




2





In print, it's ambiguous. But spoken, the intonation and rhythm would distinguish and clarify the significant constituents and their boundaries. You will not [[support, display, or show favor for] [the drinking of water]]. All written English sentences are multiply ambiguous; it is only by constant training and excluding unlikely parses that we can manage to read at all, since so much of the language is not conveyed by the orthography.

– John Lawler
3 hours ago





In print, it's ambiguous. But spoken, the intonation and rhythm would distinguish and clarify the significant constituents and their boundaries. You will not [[support, display, or show favor for] [the drinking of water]]. All written English sentences are multiply ambiguous; it is only by constant training and excluding unlikely parses that we can manage to read at all, since so much of the language is not conveyed by the orthography.

– John Lawler
3 hours ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486454%2fhow-to-properly-format-a-list-of-verbs-with-an-ambiguous-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486454%2fhow-to-properly-format-a-list-of-verbs-with-an-ambiguous-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

RAC Tourist Trophy