Present Unreal Conditional and speaking about present
I would like to ask, if the sentence below is grammatical and how can we understand this sentence:
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
Also, can we understand from this sentence that selling a car in the past influence the present?
I mean someone has sold a car in the past and to this very moment you can't see it in the database?
Thank you very much in advance for the answer.
grammar conditionals nuance
add a comment |
I would like to ask, if the sentence below is grammatical and how can we understand this sentence:
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
Also, can we understand from this sentence that selling a car in the past influence the present?
I mean someone has sold a car in the past and to this very moment you can't see it in the database?
Thank you very much in advance for the answer.
grammar conditionals nuance
In this sentence, the past doesn't influence the present. The car wouldn't be in the public database whether it wasn't sold or whether it was sold in the last week.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
If you had meant this to refer to the car, then you should have used the pronoun it (or an entry for it) instead.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
1
@Jason: I assume that what is in the public database is the record of the car's sale, and not the actual car.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
@PeterShor That would be understood. This kind of non-literal language is frequently used. But look at the parenthetical information in my comment.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
add a comment |
I would like to ask, if the sentence below is grammatical and how can we understand this sentence:
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
Also, can we understand from this sentence that selling a car in the past influence the present?
I mean someone has sold a car in the past and to this very moment you can't see it in the database?
Thank you very much in advance for the answer.
grammar conditionals nuance
I would like to ask, if the sentence below is grammatical and how can we understand this sentence:
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
Also, can we understand from this sentence that selling a car in the past influence the present?
I mean someone has sold a car in the past and to this very moment you can't see it in the database?
Thank you very much in advance for the answer.
grammar conditionals nuance
grammar conditionals nuance
asked yesterday
RichardRichard
112
112
In this sentence, the past doesn't influence the present. The car wouldn't be in the public database whether it wasn't sold or whether it was sold in the last week.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
If you had meant this to refer to the car, then you should have used the pronoun it (or an entry for it) instead.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
1
@Jason: I assume that what is in the public database is the record of the car's sale, and not the actual car.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
@PeterShor That would be understood. This kind of non-literal language is frequently used. But look at the parenthetical information in my comment.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
add a comment |
In this sentence, the past doesn't influence the present. The car wouldn't be in the public database whether it wasn't sold or whether it was sold in the last week.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
If you had meant this to refer to the car, then you should have used the pronoun it (or an entry for it) instead.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
1
@Jason: I assume that what is in the public database is the record of the car's sale, and not the actual car.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
@PeterShor That would be understood. This kind of non-literal language is frequently used. But look at the parenthetical information in my comment.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
In this sentence, the past doesn't influence the present. The car wouldn't be in the public database whether it wasn't sold or whether it was sold in the last week.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
In this sentence, the past doesn't influence the present. The car wouldn't be in the public database whether it wasn't sold or whether it was sold in the last week.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
If you had meant this to refer to the car, then you should have used the pronoun it (or an entry for it) instead.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
If you had meant this to refer to the car, then you should have used the pronoun it (or an entry for it) instead.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
1
1
@Jason: I assume that what is in the public database is the record of the car's sale, and not the actual car.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
@Jason: I assume that what is in the public database is the record of the car's sale, and not the actual car.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
@PeterShor That would be understood. This kind of non-literal language is frequently used. But look at the parenthetical information in my comment.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
@PeterShor That would be understood. This kind of non-literal language is frequently used. But look at the parenthetical information in my comment.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
Assuming the speaker knows that when a car is sold it doesn't turn up in the database until two weeks later, there are two contexts in which it can be uttered:
(1) the actual world
The context is that the speaker is talking about the actual world.
In this case, the past tense verb was, therefore, denotes the past time (last week) in the actual world, and you would normally have won't instead of wouldn't as follows:
If the car was sold in the last week, you won't see this in the public database yet.
But wouldn't isn't impossible, because it can convey some uncertainty that the speaker is not 100% sure about the assumption presented at the outset, or merely because the speaker doesn't want to sound too direct.
(2) a hypothetical/counterfactual world
The context is that the speaker is talking about a hypothetical world, and possibly even a counterfactual world.
In this case, the past tense verb wouldn't, therefore, denotes a hypothetical or even counterfactual world, and you would normally have had been instead of was as follows:
If the car had been sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
But was isn't impossible, because in informal speech the simple past tense in the if-clause can often represent a hypothetical/counterfactual world in the past time.
add a comment |
The sentence you propose is conditional. Why it is grammatically valid can be more easily seen if we turn it in to an unconditional statement.
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
becomes
The car was sold last week, therefore you won't see this in the public database yet.
This sentence implies there is some delay between the sale of the car and it being entered into the database.
Now if someone is asking why something isn't in the database yet, the conditional reply would be:
If the car was sold last week, you would not see this in the public database yet [because there is a delay between the sale and input into the database] (i.e. it hasn't been entered yet).
New contributor
Diserasta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484615%2fpresent-unreal-conditional-and-speaking-about-present%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
Assuming the speaker knows that when a car is sold it doesn't turn up in the database until two weeks later, there are two contexts in which it can be uttered:
(1) the actual world
The context is that the speaker is talking about the actual world.
In this case, the past tense verb was, therefore, denotes the past time (last week) in the actual world, and you would normally have won't instead of wouldn't as follows:
If the car was sold in the last week, you won't see this in the public database yet.
But wouldn't isn't impossible, because it can convey some uncertainty that the speaker is not 100% sure about the assumption presented at the outset, or merely because the speaker doesn't want to sound too direct.
(2) a hypothetical/counterfactual world
The context is that the speaker is talking about a hypothetical world, and possibly even a counterfactual world.
In this case, the past tense verb wouldn't, therefore, denotes a hypothetical or even counterfactual world, and you would normally have had been instead of was as follows:
If the car had been sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
But was isn't impossible, because in informal speech the simple past tense in the if-clause can often represent a hypothetical/counterfactual world in the past time.
add a comment |
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
Assuming the speaker knows that when a car is sold it doesn't turn up in the database until two weeks later, there are two contexts in which it can be uttered:
(1) the actual world
The context is that the speaker is talking about the actual world.
In this case, the past tense verb was, therefore, denotes the past time (last week) in the actual world, and you would normally have won't instead of wouldn't as follows:
If the car was sold in the last week, you won't see this in the public database yet.
But wouldn't isn't impossible, because it can convey some uncertainty that the speaker is not 100% sure about the assumption presented at the outset, or merely because the speaker doesn't want to sound too direct.
(2) a hypothetical/counterfactual world
The context is that the speaker is talking about a hypothetical world, and possibly even a counterfactual world.
In this case, the past tense verb wouldn't, therefore, denotes a hypothetical or even counterfactual world, and you would normally have had been instead of was as follows:
If the car had been sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
But was isn't impossible, because in informal speech the simple past tense in the if-clause can often represent a hypothetical/counterfactual world in the past time.
add a comment |
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
Assuming the speaker knows that when a car is sold it doesn't turn up in the database until two weeks later, there are two contexts in which it can be uttered:
(1) the actual world
The context is that the speaker is talking about the actual world.
In this case, the past tense verb was, therefore, denotes the past time (last week) in the actual world, and you would normally have won't instead of wouldn't as follows:
If the car was sold in the last week, you won't see this in the public database yet.
But wouldn't isn't impossible, because it can convey some uncertainty that the speaker is not 100% sure about the assumption presented at the outset, or merely because the speaker doesn't want to sound too direct.
(2) a hypothetical/counterfactual world
The context is that the speaker is talking about a hypothetical world, and possibly even a counterfactual world.
In this case, the past tense verb wouldn't, therefore, denotes a hypothetical or even counterfactual world, and you would normally have had been instead of was as follows:
If the car had been sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
But was isn't impossible, because in informal speech the simple past tense in the if-clause can often represent a hypothetical/counterfactual world in the past time.
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
Assuming the speaker knows that when a car is sold it doesn't turn up in the database until two weeks later, there are two contexts in which it can be uttered:
(1) the actual world
The context is that the speaker is talking about the actual world.
In this case, the past tense verb was, therefore, denotes the past time (last week) in the actual world, and you would normally have won't instead of wouldn't as follows:
If the car was sold in the last week, you won't see this in the public database yet.
But wouldn't isn't impossible, because it can convey some uncertainty that the speaker is not 100% sure about the assumption presented at the outset, or merely because the speaker doesn't want to sound too direct.
(2) a hypothetical/counterfactual world
The context is that the speaker is talking about a hypothetical world, and possibly even a counterfactual world.
In this case, the past tense verb wouldn't, therefore, denotes a hypothetical or even counterfactual world, and you would normally have had been instead of was as follows:
If the car had been sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
But was isn't impossible, because in informal speech the simple past tense in the if-clause can often represent a hypothetical/counterfactual world in the past time.
answered 19 hours ago
JK2JK2
24011651
24011651
add a comment |
add a comment |
The sentence you propose is conditional. Why it is grammatically valid can be more easily seen if we turn it in to an unconditional statement.
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
becomes
The car was sold last week, therefore you won't see this in the public database yet.
This sentence implies there is some delay between the sale of the car and it being entered into the database.
Now if someone is asking why something isn't in the database yet, the conditional reply would be:
If the car was sold last week, you would not see this in the public database yet [because there is a delay between the sale and input into the database] (i.e. it hasn't been entered yet).
New contributor
Diserasta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
The sentence you propose is conditional. Why it is grammatically valid can be more easily seen if we turn it in to an unconditional statement.
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
becomes
The car was sold last week, therefore you won't see this in the public database yet.
This sentence implies there is some delay between the sale of the car and it being entered into the database.
Now if someone is asking why something isn't in the database yet, the conditional reply would be:
If the car was sold last week, you would not see this in the public database yet [because there is a delay between the sale and input into the database] (i.e. it hasn't been entered yet).
New contributor
Diserasta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
The sentence you propose is conditional. Why it is grammatically valid can be more easily seen if we turn it in to an unconditional statement.
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
becomes
The car was sold last week, therefore you won't see this in the public database yet.
This sentence implies there is some delay between the sale of the car and it being entered into the database.
Now if someone is asking why something isn't in the database yet, the conditional reply would be:
If the car was sold last week, you would not see this in the public database yet [because there is a delay between the sale and input into the database] (i.e. it hasn't been entered yet).
New contributor
Diserasta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The sentence you propose is conditional. Why it is grammatically valid can be more easily seen if we turn it in to an unconditional statement.
If the car was sold in the last week, you wouldn't see this in the public database yet.
becomes
The car was sold last week, therefore you won't see this in the public database yet.
This sentence implies there is some delay between the sale of the car and it being entered into the database.
Now if someone is asking why something isn't in the database yet, the conditional reply would be:
If the car was sold last week, you would not see this in the public database yet [because there is a delay between the sale and input into the database] (i.e. it hasn't been entered yet).
New contributor
Diserasta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Diserasta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 21 hours ago
DiserastaDiserasta
101
101
New contributor
Diserasta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Diserasta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Diserasta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484615%2fpresent-unreal-conditional-and-speaking-about-present%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
In this sentence, the past doesn't influence the present. The car wouldn't be in the public database whether it wasn't sold or whether it was sold in the last week.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
If you had meant this to refer to the car, then you should have used the pronoun it (or an entry for it) instead.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
1
@Jason: I assume that what is in the public database is the record of the car's sale, and not the actual car.
– Peter Shor
yesterday
@PeterShor That would be understood. This kind of non-literal language is frequently used. But look at the parenthetical information in my comment.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday