Writing over fractions
I am trying to achieve this look:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
end{document}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamily{U}{tipa}{}
DeclareFontShape{U}{tipa}{m}{n}{<->tipa10}{}
newcommand{arc@char}{{usefont{U}{tipa}{m}{n}symbol{62}}}%
newcommand{arc}[1]{mathpalettearc@arc{#1}}
newcommand{arc@arc}[2]{%
sbox0{$m@th#1#2$}%
vbox{
hbox{resizebox{wd0}{height}{arc@char}}
nointerlineskip
box0
}%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\ arc{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
% $dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
$dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-2}{2x+7}}{x-4}-dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-4}{x+4}}{x-2}$
end{document}
I don't need any color or font different from the defaults.
EDIT:
Well I and modified something which is scaling with the fractions which is great but I can't rotate the arc. How to rotate it? Picture above.
math-mode
add a comment |
I am trying to achieve this look:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
end{document}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamily{U}{tipa}{}
DeclareFontShape{U}{tipa}{m}{n}{<->tipa10}{}
newcommand{arc@char}{{usefont{U}{tipa}{m}{n}symbol{62}}}%
newcommand{arc}[1]{mathpalettearc@arc{#1}}
newcommand{arc@arc}[2]{%
sbox0{$m@th#1#2$}%
vbox{
hbox{resizebox{wd0}{height}{arc@char}}
nointerlineskip
box0
}%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\ arc{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
% $dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
$dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-2}{2x+7}}{x-4}-dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-4}{x+4}}{x-2}$
end{document}
I don't need any color or font different from the defaults.
EDIT:
Well I and modified something which is scaling with the fractions which is great but I can't rotate the arc. How to rotate it? Picture above.
math-mode
1
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
yesterday
Why notoverbrace
?
– Werner
yesterday
add a comment |
I am trying to achieve this look:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
end{document}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamily{U}{tipa}{}
DeclareFontShape{U}{tipa}{m}{n}{<->tipa10}{}
newcommand{arc@char}{{usefont{U}{tipa}{m}{n}symbol{62}}}%
newcommand{arc}[1]{mathpalettearc@arc{#1}}
newcommand{arc@arc}[2]{%
sbox0{$m@th#1#2$}%
vbox{
hbox{resizebox{wd0}{height}{arc@char}}
nointerlineskip
box0
}%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\ arc{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
% $dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
$dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-2}{2x+7}}{x-4}-dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-4}{x+4}}{x-2}$
end{document}
I don't need any color or font different from the defaults.
EDIT:
Well I and modified something which is scaling with the fractions which is great but I can't rotate the arc. How to rotate it? Picture above.
math-mode
I am trying to achieve this look:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
end{document}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamily{U}{tipa}{}
DeclareFontShape{U}{tipa}{m}{n}{<->tipa10}{}
newcommand{arc@char}{{usefont{U}{tipa}{m}{n}symbol{62}}}%
newcommand{arc}[1]{mathpalettearc@arc{#1}}
newcommand{arc@arc}[2]{%
sbox0{$m@th#1#2$}%
vbox{
hbox{resizebox{wd0}{height}{arc@char}}
nointerlineskip
box0
}%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\ arc{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
% $dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
$dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-2}{2x+7}}{x-4}-dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-4}{x+4}}{x-2}$
end{document}
I don't need any color or font different from the defaults.
EDIT:
Well I and modified something which is scaling with the fractions which is great but I can't rotate the arc. How to rotate it? Picture above.
math-mode
math-mode
edited yesterday
Simeon Simeonov
asked yesterday
Simeon SimeonovSimeon Simeonov
3696
3696
1
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
yesterday
Why notoverbrace
?
– Werner
yesterday
add a comment |
1
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
yesterday
Why notoverbrace
?
– Werner
yesterday
1
1
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
yesterday
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
yesterday
Why not
overbrace
?– Werner
yesterday
Why not
overbrace
?– Werner
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Here is a proposal that marries your command with this answer by egreg.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
makeatletter% based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/260580/121799
newcommandunderparenonly[1]{%
mathop{%
vtop{
m@th
ialign{%
##crcr
$hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr
noalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
upparenfillcrcr
}%
}%
}
}
newcommandupparenfill{%
$m@thsetboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveChar}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}underparenonly{#1}\[1ex]{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
$stackAboveChar{x-2}{dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}}-stackAboveChar{x-4}{dfrac{x+4}{x-2}}$
end{document}
As for the code in your question: as you are already using graphicx
, you could just add a rotatebox
to flip the parenthesis.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamily{U}{tipa}{}
DeclareFontShape{U}{tipa}{m}{n}{<->tipa10}{}
newcommand{arc@char}{{usefont{U}{tipa}{m}{n}symbol{62}}}%
newcommand{arc}[1]{mathpalettearc@arc{#1}}
newcommand{arc@arc}[2]{%
sbox0{$m@th#1#2$}%
vbox{
hbox{resizebox{wd0}{height}{rotatebox[origin=bottom]{180}{arc@char}}}
nointerlineskip
box0
}%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\ arc{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
% $dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
$dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-2}{2x+7}}{x-4}-dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-4}{x+4}}{x-2}$
end{document}
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
yesterday
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
yesterday
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negativevspace{}
?
– Simeon Simeonov
19 hours ago
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\[-0.5ex] arc{#2}end{array}}
? I.e. add some negative dimension like-0.5ex
. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.
– marmot
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473265%2fwriting-over-fractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Here is a proposal that marries your command with this answer by egreg.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
makeatletter% based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/260580/121799
newcommandunderparenonly[1]{%
mathop{%
vtop{
m@th
ialign{%
##crcr
$hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr
noalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
upparenfillcrcr
}%
}%
}
}
newcommandupparenfill{%
$m@thsetboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveChar}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}underparenonly{#1}\[1ex]{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
$stackAboveChar{x-2}{dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}}-stackAboveChar{x-4}{dfrac{x+4}{x-2}}$
end{document}
As for the code in your question: as you are already using graphicx
, you could just add a rotatebox
to flip the parenthesis.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamily{U}{tipa}{}
DeclareFontShape{U}{tipa}{m}{n}{<->tipa10}{}
newcommand{arc@char}{{usefont{U}{tipa}{m}{n}symbol{62}}}%
newcommand{arc}[1]{mathpalettearc@arc{#1}}
newcommand{arc@arc}[2]{%
sbox0{$m@th#1#2$}%
vbox{
hbox{resizebox{wd0}{height}{rotatebox[origin=bottom]{180}{arc@char}}}
nointerlineskip
box0
}%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\ arc{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
% $dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
$dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-2}{2x+7}}{x-4}-dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-4}{x+4}}{x-2}$
end{document}
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
yesterday
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
yesterday
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negativevspace{}
?
– Simeon Simeonov
19 hours ago
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\[-0.5ex] arc{#2}end{array}}
? I.e. add some negative dimension like-0.5ex
. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.
– marmot
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Here is a proposal that marries your command with this answer by egreg.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
makeatletter% based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/260580/121799
newcommandunderparenonly[1]{%
mathop{%
vtop{
m@th
ialign{%
##crcr
$hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr
noalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
upparenfillcrcr
}%
}%
}
}
newcommandupparenfill{%
$m@thsetboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveChar}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}underparenonly{#1}\[1ex]{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
$stackAboveChar{x-2}{dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}}-stackAboveChar{x-4}{dfrac{x+4}{x-2}}$
end{document}
As for the code in your question: as you are already using graphicx
, you could just add a rotatebox
to flip the parenthesis.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamily{U}{tipa}{}
DeclareFontShape{U}{tipa}{m}{n}{<->tipa10}{}
newcommand{arc@char}{{usefont{U}{tipa}{m}{n}symbol{62}}}%
newcommand{arc}[1]{mathpalettearc@arc{#1}}
newcommand{arc@arc}[2]{%
sbox0{$m@th#1#2$}%
vbox{
hbox{resizebox{wd0}{height}{rotatebox[origin=bottom]{180}{arc@char}}}
nointerlineskip
box0
}%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\ arc{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
% $dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
$dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-2}{2x+7}}{x-4}-dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-4}{x+4}}{x-2}$
end{document}
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
yesterday
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
yesterday
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negativevspace{}
?
– Simeon Simeonov
19 hours ago
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\[-0.5ex] arc{#2}end{array}}
? I.e. add some negative dimension like-0.5ex
. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.
– marmot
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Here is a proposal that marries your command with this answer by egreg.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
makeatletter% based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/260580/121799
newcommandunderparenonly[1]{%
mathop{%
vtop{
m@th
ialign{%
##crcr
$hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr
noalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
upparenfillcrcr
}%
}%
}
}
newcommandupparenfill{%
$m@thsetboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveChar}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}underparenonly{#1}\[1ex]{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
$stackAboveChar{x-2}{dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}}-stackAboveChar{x-4}{dfrac{x+4}{x-2}}$
end{document}
As for the code in your question: as you are already using graphicx
, you could just add a rotatebox
to flip the parenthesis.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamily{U}{tipa}{}
DeclareFontShape{U}{tipa}{m}{n}{<->tipa10}{}
newcommand{arc@char}{{usefont{U}{tipa}{m}{n}symbol{62}}}%
newcommand{arc}[1]{mathpalettearc@arc{#1}}
newcommand{arc@arc}[2]{%
sbox0{$m@th#1#2$}%
vbox{
hbox{resizebox{wd0}{height}{rotatebox[origin=bottom]{180}{arc@char}}}
nointerlineskip
box0
}%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\ arc{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
% $dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
$dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-2}{2x+7}}{x-4}-dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-4}{x+4}}{x-2}$
end{document}
Here is a proposal that marries your command with this answer by egreg.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
makeatletter% based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/260580/121799
newcommandunderparenonly[1]{%
mathop{%
vtop{
m@th
ialign{%
##crcr
$hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr
noalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
upparenfillcrcr
}%
}%
}
}
newcommandupparenfill{%
$m@thsetboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveChar}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}underparenonly{#1}\[1ex]{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
$stackAboveChar{x-2}{dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}}-stackAboveChar{x-4}{dfrac{x+4}{x-2}}$
end{document}
As for the code in your question: as you are already using graphicx
, you could just add a rotatebox
to flip the parenthesis.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamily{U}{tipa}{}
DeclareFontShape{U}{tipa}{m}{n}{<->tipa10}{}
newcommand{arc@char}{{usefont{U}{tipa}{m}{n}symbol{62}}}%
newcommand{arc}[1]{mathpalettearc@arc{#1}}
newcommand{arc@arc}[2]{%
sbox0{$m@th#1#2$}%
vbox{
hbox{resizebox{wd0}{height}{rotatebox[origin=bottom]{180}{arc@char}}}
nointerlineskip
box0
}%
}
makeatother
newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\ arc{#2}end{array}}
begin{document}
% $dfrac{2x+7}{x-4}-dfrac{x+4}{x-2}$
$dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-2}{2x+7}}{x-4}-dfrac{stackAboveArc{x-4}{x+4}}{x-2}$
end{document}
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
marmotmarmot
97.3k4112214
97.3k4112214
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
yesterday
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
yesterday
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negativevspace{}
?
– Simeon Simeonov
19 hours ago
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\[-0.5ex] arc{#2}end{array}}
? I.e. add some negative dimension like-0.5ex
. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.
– marmot
16 hours ago
add a comment |
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
yesterday
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
yesterday
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negativevspace{}
?
– Simeon Simeonov
19 hours ago
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\[-0.5ex] arc{#2}end{array}}
? I.e. add some negative dimension like-0.5ex
. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.
– marmot
16 hours ago
1
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
yesterday
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
yesterday
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
yesterday
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
yesterday
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negative
vspace{}
?– Simeon Simeonov
19 hours ago
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negative
vspace{}
?– Simeon Simeonov
19 hours ago
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.
newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\[-0.5ex] arc{#2}end{array}}
? I.e. add some negative dimension like -0.5ex
. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.– marmot
16 hours ago
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.
newcommand{stackAboveArc}[2]{begin{array}[b]{@{}c@{}}#1\[-0.5ex] arc{#2}end{array}}
? I.e. add some negative dimension like -0.5ex
. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.– marmot
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473265%2fwriting-over-fractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
yesterday
Why not
overbrace
?– Werner
yesterday