The integral of a function multiplied with an unbounded function converges if the product is a bounded...












4












$begingroup$


Suppose $f:[1,infty]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is such that $g(x):=x^2f(x)$ is a bounded function. Prove that $int_1^infty f$ converges.




Intuitively I think it seems reasonable. As $x^2$ is increasing and unbounded above, $f(x)$ must be a decreasing function with higher absolute slope than $x^2$ so as $g(x)$ can be bounded. Not sure how to proceed further from here.






real-analysis convergence improper-integrals







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    Suppose $f:[1,infty]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is such that $g(x):=x^2f(x)$ is a bounded function. Prove that $int_1^infty f$ converges.




    Intuitively I think it seems reasonable. As $x^2$ is increasing and unbounded above, $f(x)$ must be a decreasing function with higher absolute slope than $x^2$ so as $g(x)$ can be bounded. Not sure how to proceed further from here.






    real-analysis convergence improper-integrals







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      Suppose $f:[1,infty]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is such that $g(x):=x^2f(x)$ is a bounded function. Prove that $int_1^infty f$ converges.




      Intuitively I think it seems reasonable. As $x^2$ is increasing and unbounded above, $f(x)$ must be a decreasing function with higher absolute slope than $x^2$ so as $g(x)$ can be bounded. Not sure how to proceed further from here.






      real-analysis convergence improper-integrals







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose $f:[1,infty]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is such that $g(x):=x^2f(x)$ is a bounded function. Prove that $int_1^infty f$ converges.




      Intuitively I think it seems reasonable. As $x^2$ is increasing and unbounded above, $f(x)$ must be a decreasing function with higher absolute slope than $x^2$ so as $g(x)$ can be bounded. Not sure how to proceed further from here.






      real-analysis convergence improper-integrals




      real-analysis convergence improper-integrals






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      Sher AfghanSher Afghan

      1619




      1619






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          Let $|g(x)|le M$ (assumption it is bounded). Then $|f(x)|le frac{M}{x^2}$ so $int_1^infty|f(x)|dxle Mint_1^inftyfrac{dx}{x^2}=M$. Therefore $f(x)$ is integrable.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 4




            $begingroup$
            +1, but just to make it explicit: the OP's intuitive reasoning about "increasing and unbounded above" is not correct, because the claim becomes false if we replace $g(x) := x^2 f(x)$ with $g(x) := x f(x)$ (even though $x$ is "increasing and unbounded above" just as $x^2$ is).
            $endgroup$
            – ruakh
            yesterday











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3099318%2fthe-integral-of-a-function-multiplied-with-an-unbounded-function-converges-if-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8












          $begingroup$

          Let $|g(x)|le M$ (assumption it is bounded). Then $|f(x)|le frac{M}{x^2}$ so $int_1^infty|f(x)|dxle Mint_1^inftyfrac{dx}{x^2}=M$. Therefore $f(x)$ is integrable.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 4




            $begingroup$
            +1, but just to make it explicit: the OP's intuitive reasoning about "increasing and unbounded above" is not correct, because the claim becomes false if we replace $g(x) := x^2 f(x)$ with $g(x) := x f(x)$ (even though $x$ is "increasing and unbounded above" just as $x^2$ is).
            $endgroup$
            – ruakh
            yesterday
















          8












          $begingroup$

          Let $|g(x)|le M$ (assumption it is bounded). Then $|f(x)|le frac{M}{x^2}$ so $int_1^infty|f(x)|dxle Mint_1^inftyfrac{dx}{x^2}=M$. Therefore $f(x)$ is integrable.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 4




            $begingroup$
            +1, but just to make it explicit: the OP's intuitive reasoning about "increasing and unbounded above" is not correct, because the claim becomes false if we replace $g(x) := x^2 f(x)$ with $g(x) := x f(x)$ (even though $x$ is "increasing and unbounded above" just as $x^2$ is).
            $endgroup$
            – ruakh
            yesterday














          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          Let $|g(x)|le M$ (assumption it is bounded). Then $|f(x)|le frac{M}{x^2}$ so $int_1^infty|f(x)|dxle Mint_1^inftyfrac{dx}{x^2}=M$. Therefore $f(x)$ is integrable.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Let $|g(x)|le M$ (assumption it is bounded). Then $|f(x)|le frac{M}{x^2}$ so $int_1^infty|f(x)|dxle Mint_1^inftyfrac{dx}{x^2}=M$. Therefore $f(x)$ is integrable.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          herb steinbergherb steinberg

          2,6932310




          2,6932310








          • 4




            $begingroup$
            +1, but just to make it explicit: the OP's intuitive reasoning about "increasing and unbounded above" is not correct, because the claim becomes false if we replace $g(x) := x^2 f(x)$ with $g(x) := x f(x)$ (even though $x$ is "increasing and unbounded above" just as $x^2$ is).
            $endgroup$
            – ruakh
            yesterday














          • 4




            $begingroup$
            +1, but just to make it explicit: the OP's intuitive reasoning about "increasing and unbounded above" is not correct, because the claim becomes false if we replace $g(x) := x^2 f(x)$ with $g(x) := x f(x)$ (even though $x$ is "increasing and unbounded above" just as $x^2$ is).
            $endgroup$
            – ruakh
            yesterday








          4




          4




          $begingroup$
          +1, but just to make it explicit: the OP's intuitive reasoning about "increasing and unbounded above" is not correct, because the claim becomes false if we replace $g(x) := x^2 f(x)$ with $g(x) := x f(x)$ (even though $x$ is "increasing and unbounded above" just as $x^2$ is).
          $endgroup$
          – ruakh
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          +1, but just to make it explicit: the OP's intuitive reasoning about "increasing and unbounded above" is not correct, because the claim becomes false if we replace $g(x) := x^2 f(x)$ with $g(x) := x f(x)$ (even though $x$ is "increasing and unbounded above" just as $x^2$ is).
          $endgroup$
          – ruakh
          yesterday


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3099318%2fthe-integral-of-a-function-multiplied-with-an-unbounded-function-converges-if-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

          Image
          5 This question already has an answer here: How do you calculate the likelihood of drawing certain cards in your opening hand? 3 answers There is a funny modern deck where you play Treasure Hunt, but you really need to have it on the starting hand. How many mulligans should I take, if my deck contains 60 cards and contains 4 copies of Treasure Hunt? magic-the-gathering probability share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:12 dan dan 152 4
          Read more

          Alcedinidae

          Image
          Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
          Read more

          Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]

          Image
          9 $begingroup$ This question already has an answer here: What happens if we put together a proton and an antineutron? 2 answers Is it theoretically possible to make a "deuterium" atom containing a proton and an antineutron in its nucleus? Would the strong nuclear force cause attraction between a proton and an antineutron? Would such a nucleus be stable, or would the proton somehow annihilate the antineutron when close enough? nuclear-physics antimatter share | cite | improve this question asked yesterday
          Read more