Dot in front of file [duplicate]












4
















This question already has an answer here:




  • Filename with dot in front

    1 answer




If there is a file and the filename starts with a dot in front of it. Does that mean that you created the file and you are hiding stuff in it or can the files get created on their own without you creating the filename. I'm just saying I have files with dots in front of them but I didnt create them.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Regina Saucedo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by Stephen Kitt, Jesse_b, Olorin, Rui F Ribeiro, Kusalananda 15 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.



















  • Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

    – kemotep
    yesterday











  • I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

    – Regina Saucedo
    yesterday











  • Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

    – Micha
    yesterday











  • -1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

    – Weijun Zhou
    15 hours ago
















4
















This question already has an answer here:




  • Filename with dot in front

    1 answer




If there is a file and the filename starts with a dot in front of it. Does that mean that you created the file and you are hiding stuff in it or can the files get created on their own without you creating the filename. I'm just saying I have files with dots in front of them but I didnt create them.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Regina Saucedo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by Stephen Kitt, Jesse_b, Olorin, Rui F Ribeiro, Kusalananda 15 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.



















  • Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

    – kemotep
    yesterday











  • I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

    – Regina Saucedo
    yesterday











  • Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

    – Micha
    yesterday











  • -1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

    – Weijun Zhou
    15 hours ago














4












4








4









This question already has an answer here:




  • Filename with dot in front

    1 answer




If there is a file and the filename starts with a dot in front of it. Does that mean that you created the file and you are hiding stuff in it or can the files get created on their own without you creating the filename. I'm just saying I have files with dots in front of them but I didnt create them.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Regina Saucedo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













This question already has an answer here:




  • Filename with dot in front

    1 answer




If there is a file and the filename starts with a dot in front of it. Does that mean that you created the file and you are hiding stuff in it or can the files get created on their own without you creating the filename. I'm just saying I have files with dots in front of them but I didnt create them.





This question already has an answer here:




  • Filename with dot in front

    1 answer








filenames dot-files






share|improve this question









New contributor




Regina Saucedo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Regina Saucedo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 15 hours ago









Rui F Ribeiro

41.5k1483140




41.5k1483140






New contributor




Regina Saucedo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Regina SaucedoRegina Saucedo

281




281




New contributor




Regina Saucedo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Regina Saucedo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Regina Saucedo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




marked as duplicate by Stephen Kitt, Jesse_b, Olorin, Rui F Ribeiro, Kusalananda 15 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Stephen Kitt, Jesse_b, Olorin, Rui F Ribeiro, Kusalananda 15 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

    – kemotep
    yesterday











  • I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

    – Regina Saucedo
    yesterday











  • Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

    – Micha
    yesterday











  • -1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

    – Weijun Zhou
    15 hours ago



















  • Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

    – kemotep
    yesterday











  • I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

    – Regina Saucedo
    yesterday











  • Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

    – Micha
    yesterday











  • -1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

    – Weijun Zhou
    15 hours ago

















Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

– kemotep
yesterday





Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

– kemotep
yesterday













I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

– Regina Saucedo
yesterday





I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

– Regina Saucedo
yesterday













Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

– Micha
yesterday





Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

– Micha
yesterday













-1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

– Weijun Zhou
15 hours ago





-1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

– Weijun Zhou
15 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















15














This can likely be explained by a google post by Rob Pike about the origin of hidden files.



In the early days of Unix there was no concept of hidden files but the files . and .. existed to represent the current directory and parent directory. It became annoying to list these files every time ls was used so a simple change was made to the ls program to hide any file beginning with a .. This change, had the unplanned effect of allowing for "hidden files".



As Rob Pike explains:




As a consequence, more lazy programmers started dropping files into everyone's home directory. I don't have all that much stuff installed on the machine I'm using to type this, but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed. Every file name evaluation that goes through my home directory is slowed down by this accumulated sludge.






So to answer your question those hidden files you didn't create are likely some sort of config files from applications you have installed.






share|improve this answer
























  • ... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

    – crasic
    18 hours ago













  • Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

    – Joey
    18 hours ago











  • @crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

    – David Ongaro
    16 hours ago











  • Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

    – David Ongaro
    16 hours ago


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









15














This can likely be explained by a google post by Rob Pike about the origin of hidden files.



In the early days of Unix there was no concept of hidden files but the files . and .. existed to represent the current directory and parent directory. It became annoying to list these files every time ls was used so a simple change was made to the ls program to hide any file beginning with a .. This change, had the unplanned effect of allowing for "hidden files".



As Rob Pike explains:




As a consequence, more lazy programmers started dropping files into everyone's home directory. I don't have all that much stuff installed on the machine I'm using to type this, but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed. Every file name evaluation that goes through my home directory is slowed down by this accumulated sludge.






So to answer your question those hidden files you didn't create are likely some sort of config files from applications you have installed.






share|improve this answer
























  • ... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

    – crasic
    18 hours ago













  • Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

    – Joey
    18 hours ago











  • @crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

    – David Ongaro
    16 hours ago











  • Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

    – David Ongaro
    16 hours ago
















15














This can likely be explained by a google post by Rob Pike about the origin of hidden files.



In the early days of Unix there was no concept of hidden files but the files . and .. existed to represent the current directory and parent directory. It became annoying to list these files every time ls was used so a simple change was made to the ls program to hide any file beginning with a .. This change, had the unplanned effect of allowing for "hidden files".



As Rob Pike explains:




As a consequence, more lazy programmers started dropping files into everyone's home directory. I don't have all that much stuff installed on the machine I'm using to type this, but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed. Every file name evaluation that goes through my home directory is slowed down by this accumulated sludge.






So to answer your question those hidden files you didn't create are likely some sort of config files from applications you have installed.






share|improve this answer
























  • ... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

    – crasic
    18 hours ago













  • Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

    – Joey
    18 hours ago











  • @crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

    – David Ongaro
    16 hours ago











  • Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

    – David Ongaro
    16 hours ago














15












15








15







This can likely be explained by a google post by Rob Pike about the origin of hidden files.



In the early days of Unix there was no concept of hidden files but the files . and .. existed to represent the current directory and parent directory. It became annoying to list these files every time ls was used so a simple change was made to the ls program to hide any file beginning with a .. This change, had the unplanned effect of allowing for "hidden files".



As Rob Pike explains:




As a consequence, more lazy programmers started dropping files into everyone's home directory. I don't have all that much stuff installed on the machine I'm using to type this, but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed. Every file name evaluation that goes through my home directory is slowed down by this accumulated sludge.






So to answer your question those hidden files you didn't create are likely some sort of config files from applications you have installed.






share|improve this answer













This can likely be explained by a google post by Rob Pike about the origin of hidden files.



In the early days of Unix there was no concept of hidden files but the files . and .. existed to represent the current directory and parent directory. It became annoying to list these files every time ls was used so a simple change was made to the ls program to hide any file beginning with a .. This change, had the unplanned effect of allowing for "hidden files".



As Rob Pike explains:




As a consequence, more lazy programmers started dropping files into everyone's home directory. I don't have all that much stuff installed on the machine I'm using to type this, but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed. Every file name evaluation that goes through my home directory is slowed down by this accumulated sludge.






So to answer your question those hidden files you didn't create are likely some sort of config files from applications you have installed.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Jesse_bJesse_b

13.5k23371




13.5k23371













  • ... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

    – crasic
    18 hours ago













  • Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

    – Joey
    18 hours ago











  • @crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

    – David Ongaro
    16 hours ago











  • Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

    – David Ongaro
    16 hours ago



















  • ... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

    – crasic
    18 hours ago













  • Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

    – Joey
    18 hours ago











  • @crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

    – David Ongaro
    16 hours ago











  • Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

    – David Ongaro
    16 hours ago

















... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

– crasic
18 hours ago







... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

– crasic
18 hours ago















Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

– Joey
18 hours ago





Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

– Joey
18 hours ago













@crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

– David Ongaro
16 hours ago





@crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

– David Ongaro
16 hours ago













Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

– David Ongaro
16 hours ago





Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

– David Ongaro
16 hours ago



Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]