Rank ANCOVA is a bad idea?
$begingroup$
I am currently working on a project looking at the best way to handle missing data (such as quality of life) due to death. One approach is to use categories/ranks for the outcome, where death is the worst category. One approach that my colleagues wish to consider is rank ANCOVA. However I am pleased to say that they also wish to consider proportional odds models and continuation ratio models.
I found an R help page that says “This [rank ANCOVA] has been shown to yield unreliable analyses. Use the more formal proportional odds ordinal logistic model. This is a generalization of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Kruskal-Wallis statistic. This is implemented in the rms package and elsewhere”.
My question is this: Could anyone tell me where this has been shown? In particular the part about rank ancova being unreliable?
regression nonparametric
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am currently working on a project looking at the best way to handle missing data (such as quality of life) due to death. One approach is to use categories/ranks for the outcome, where death is the worst category. One approach that my colleagues wish to consider is rank ANCOVA. However I am pleased to say that they also wish to consider proportional odds models and continuation ratio models.
I found an R help page that says “This [rank ANCOVA] has been shown to yield unreliable analyses. Use the more formal proportional odds ordinal logistic model. This is a generalization of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Kruskal-Wallis statistic. This is implemented in the rms package and elsewhere”.
My question is this: Could anyone tell me where this has been shown? In particular the part about rank ancova being unreliable?
regression nonparametric
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am currently working on a project looking at the best way to handle missing data (such as quality of life) due to death. One approach is to use categories/ranks for the outcome, where death is the worst category. One approach that my colleagues wish to consider is rank ANCOVA. However I am pleased to say that they also wish to consider proportional odds models and continuation ratio models.
I found an R help page that says “This [rank ANCOVA] has been shown to yield unreliable analyses. Use the more formal proportional odds ordinal logistic model. This is a generalization of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Kruskal-Wallis statistic. This is implemented in the rms package and elsewhere”.
My question is this: Could anyone tell me where this has been shown? In particular the part about rank ancova being unreliable?
regression nonparametric
New contributor
$endgroup$
I am currently working on a project looking at the best way to handle missing data (such as quality of life) due to death. One approach is to use categories/ranks for the outcome, where death is the worst category. One approach that my colleagues wish to consider is rank ANCOVA. However I am pleased to say that they also wish to consider proportional odds models and continuation ratio models.
I found an R help page that says “This [rank ANCOVA] has been shown to yield unreliable analyses. Use the more formal proportional odds ordinal logistic model. This is a generalization of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Kruskal-Wallis statistic. This is implemented in the rms package and elsewhere”.
My question is this: Could anyone tell me where this has been shown? In particular the part about rank ancova being unreliable?
regression nonparametric
regression nonparametric
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 14 hours ago
Dan JacksonDan Jackson
161
161
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This paper may be a good one demonstrating problems with rank transform anova: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476644
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2291530?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Just transforming data with ranks and using ordinary regression/anova/ancova, in cases other than the k-sample problem, i.e., attempting to use this when adjusting for covariates or assessing interactions, is not fully based on good statistical principles, and results are hard to interpret.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Dan Jackson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f397462%2frank-ancova-is-a-bad-idea%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This paper may be a good one demonstrating problems with rank transform anova: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476644
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2291530?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Just transforming data with ranks and using ordinary regression/anova/ancova, in cases other than the k-sample problem, i.e., attempting to use this when adjusting for covariates or assessing interactions, is not fully based on good statistical principles, and results are hard to interpret.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This paper may be a good one demonstrating problems with rank transform anova: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476644
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2291530?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Just transforming data with ranks and using ordinary regression/anova/ancova, in cases other than the k-sample problem, i.e., attempting to use this when adjusting for covariates or assessing interactions, is not fully based on good statistical principles, and results are hard to interpret.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This paper may be a good one demonstrating problems with rank transform anova: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476644
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2291530?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Just transforming data with ranks and using ordinary regression/anova/ancova, in cases other than the k-sample problem, i.e., attempting to use this when adjusting for covariates or assessing interactions, is not fully based on good statistical principles, and results are hard to interpret.
$endgroup$
This paper may be a good one demonstrating problems with rank transform anova: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476644
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2291530?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Just transforming data with ranks and using ordinary regression/anova/ancova, in cases other than the k-sample problem, i.e., attempting to use this when adjusting for covariates or assessing interactions, is not fully based on good statistical principles, and results are hard to interpret.
answered 13 hours ago
Frank HarrellFrank Harrell
55.4k3108244
55.4k3108244
add a comment |
add a comment |
Dan Jackson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dan Jackson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dan Jackson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dan Jackson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f397462%2frank-ancova-is-a-bad-idea%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown