Setting up VirtualBox guest for PXE boot
I'm having an issue getting VirtualBox to boot from the network. I have a Server 2k8 installed and setup and acting as AD DS, DNS, DHCP and WDS. I have two adapter on the server, one of which I have setup as a static IP the one I'm using to hand out IPs to some of the other guest VMs and its setup as a 192.168.2 address.
I have a couple guest VMs that I'm not sure if I'm setting up the adapters on them right or not. The static IP adapter on the server is adapter #2 and it's set to bridge, Intel PRO/1000 MT Desktop and is set to Allow All. Now on some of the guests I have those adapters setup the same but when I try to boot from LAN it either gives me a No boot medium found. System Halted! message or it will get a 192.168.1 address.
I have a clonezilla.iso attached to the guest VMs and when I choose to Network Boot from iPXE from the list of options it presents it finds the 192.168.2 server and I'm able to press F12 and my Windows 7 image will load up and I'm able to install it. On the guest VMs I've tried setting the adapters to PCnet II and PCnet III and it will show the DHCP server IP and the guest IP and they're getting a 192.168.2 address but then it says No file found and sticks on the No bootable medium found. System halted!
Could someone help me out and see where I might be messing up?
windows-7 virtualbox windows-server-2008 clonezilla pxe
edited Jul 14 '12 at 4:49
Sathyajith Bhat♦
53k29157253
asked Jul 14 '12 at 0:17
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
add a comment |
I'm having an issue getting VirtualBox to boot from the network. I have a Server 2k8 installed and setup and acting as AD DS, DNS, DHCP and WDS. I have two adapter on the server, one of which I have setup as a static IP the one I'm using to hand out IPs to some of the other guest VMs and its setup as a 192.168.2 address.
I have a couple guest VMs that I'm not sure if I'm setting up the adapters on them right or not. The static IP adapter on the server is adapter #2 and it's set to bridge, Intel PRO/1000 MT Desktop and is set to Allow All. Now on some of the guests I have those adapters setup the same but when I try to boot from LAN it either gives me a No boot medium found. System Halted! message or it will get a 192.168.1 address.
I have a clonezilla.iso attached to the guest VMs and when I choose to Network Boot from iPXE from the list of options it presents it finds the 192.168.2 server and I'm able to press F12 and my Windows 7 image will load up and I'm able to install it. On the guest VMs I've tried setting the adapters to PCnet II and PCnet III and it will show the DHCP server IP and the guest IP and they're getting a 192.168.2 address but then it says No file found and sticks on the No bootable medium found. System halted!
Could someone help me out and see where I might be messing up?
windows-7 virtualbox windows-server-2008 clonezilla pxe
edited Jul 14 '12 at 4:49
Sathyajith Bhat♦
53k29157253
asked Jul 14 '12 at 0:17
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
add a comment |
I'm having an issue getting VirtualBox to boot from the network. I have a Server 2k8 installed and setup and acting as AD DS, DNS, DHCP and WDS. I have two adapter on the server, one of which I have setup as a static IP the one I'm using to hand out IPs to some of the other guest VMs and its setup as a 192.168.2 address.
I have a couple guest VMs that I'm not sure if I'm setting up the adapters on them right or not. The static IP adapter on the server is adapter #2 and it's set to bridge, Intel PRO/1000 MT Desktop and is set to Allow All. Now on some of the guests I have those adapters setup the same but when I try to boot from LAN it either gives me a No boot medium found. System Halted! message or it will get a 192.168.1 address.
I have a clonezilla.iso attached to the guest VMs and when I choose to Network Boot from iPXE from the list of options it presents it finds the 192.168.2 server and I'm able to press F12 and my Windows 7 image will load up and I'm able to install it. On the guest VMs I've tried setting the adapters to PCnet II and PCnet III and it will show the DHCP server IP and the guest IP and they're getting a 192.168.2 address but then it says No file found and sticks on the No bootable medium found. System halted!
Could someone help me out and see where I might be messing up?
windows-7 virtualbox windows-server-2008 clonezilla pxe
edited Jul 14 '12 at 4:49
Sathyajith Bhat♦
53k29157253
asked Jul 14 '12 at 0:17
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
I'm having an issue getting VirtualBox to boot from the network. I have a Server 2k8 installed and setup and acting as AD DS, DNS, DHCP and WDS. I have two adapter on the server, one of which I have setup as a static IP the one I'm using to hand out IPs to some of the other guest VMs and its setup as a 192.168.2 address.
I have a couple guest VMs that I'm not sure if I'm setting up the adapters on them right or not. The static IP adapter on the server is adapter #2 and it's set to bridge, Intel PRO/1000 MT Desktop and is set to Allow All. Now on some of the guests I have those adapters setup the same but when I try to boot from LAN it either gives me a No boot medium found. System Halted! message or it will get a 192.168.1 address.
I have a clonezilla.iso attached to the guest VMs and when I choose to Network Boot from iPXE from the list of options it presents it finds the 192.168.2 server and I'm able to press F12 and my Windows 7 image will load up and I'm able to install it. On the guest VMs I've tried setting the adapters to PCnet II and PCnet III and it will show the DHCP server IP and the guest IP and they're getting a 192.168.2 address but then it says No file found and sticks on the No bootable medium found. System halted!
Could someone help me out and see where I might be messing up?
windows-7 virtualbox windows-server-2008 clonezilla pxe
windows-7 virtualbox windows-server-2008 clonezilla pxe
edited Jul 14 '12 at 4:49
Sathyajith Bhat♦
53k29157253
asked Jul 14 '12 at 0:17
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
edited Jul 14 '12 at 4:49
Sathyajith Bhat♦
53k29157253
asked Jul 14 '12 at 0:17
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
edited Jul 14 '12 at 4:49
Sathyajith Bhat♦
53k29157253
edited Jul 14 '12 at 4:49
Sathyajith Bhat♦
53k29157253
edited Jul 14 '12 at 4:49
Sathyajith Bhat♦
53k29157253
53k29157253
asked Jul 14 '12 at 0:17
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
asked Jul 14 '12 at 0:17
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
asked Jul 14 '12 at 0:17
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
6116
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
For anyone who runs across this, I had the latest version of VirtualBox and after reading through some of the forum posts on virtualbox.org found there is an extension pack that has updates for PXE that doesn't install when you check for updates. I downloaded it and installed it and am now able to successfully boot PXE like normal without having to go through Clonezilla lol.
answered Jul 14 '12 at 4:40
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
This is the solution in my case. Thanks a million! It was nothing to do with promiscuous mode NICs or wacky bridged adapter configurations (although I think a VBox bridged adapter might be required). For the benefit of others arriving here via web searches, Extension Packs for old releases—such as the version in the repos of your "Long-Term Service" Linux distro—may be downloaded here.
– TheDudeAbides
Jan 18 at 21:25
add a comment |
This is not an answer, but a long comment, with pictures. Seth's self-answer is the answer.
But I've been hunting for this "solution" for probably a year, and there are so many threads in the VirtualBox forums about PXE boot problems, I just wonder how many of them are caused by just not having the non-free Extension Pack installed. Some rainy day I'm going to link them all here. :)
I had installed the Debian-friendly open-source version from my Linux distro's package manager (virtualbox 5.1.38-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1), without having downloaded the corresponding Extension Pack.
The open-source "iPXE" PXE ROM that comes with the open-source version of VirtualBox looks like this when it boots up:
However, that boot ROM seems not to work with the (Windows) workstation imaging environment at my institution. It seems to load a boot image initially, but I always end up with the following fatal error:
Windows failed to start.
Status: 0xc000000f
Info: A required device isn't connected or can't be accessed.
The (presumably secret IP-containing) PXE boot ROM that comes with the Oracle Extension pack, however, does not have this problem, and loads the workstation imaging environment without apparent issue. Its boot messages look like this:
and
The rest of the boot process after that proceeds fine.
answered Jan 18 at 21:16
TheDudeAbidesTheDudeAbides
36349
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f448700%2fsetting-up-virtualbox-guest-for-pxe-boot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
For anyone who runs across this, I had the latest version of VirtualBox and after reading through some of the forum posts on virtualbox.org found there is an extension pack that has updates for PXE that doesn't install when you check for updates. I downloaded it and installed it and am now able to successfully boot PXE like normal without having to go through Clonezilla lol.
answered Jul 14 '12 at 4:40
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
This is the solution in my case. Thanks a million! It was nothing to do with promiscuous mode NICs or wacky bridged adapter configurations (although I think a VBox bridged adapter might be required). For the benefit of others arriving here via web searches, Extension Packs for old releases—such as the version in the repos of your "Long-Term Service" Linux distro—may be downloaded here.
– TheDudeAbides
Jan 18 at 21:25
add a comment |
For anyone who runs across this, I had the latest version of VirtualBox and after reading through some of the forum posts on virtualbox.org found there is an extension pack that has updates for PXE that doesn't install when you check for updates. I downloaded it and installed it and am now able to successfully boot PXE like normal without having to go through Clonezilla lol.
answered Jul 14 '12 at 4:40
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
This is the solution in my case. Thanks a million! It was nothing to do with promiscuous mode NICs or wacky bridged adapter configurations (although I think a VBox bridged adapter might be required). For the benefit of others arriving here via web searches, Extension Packs for old releases—such as the version in the repos of your "Long-Term Service" Linux distro—may be downloaded here.
– TheDudeAbides
Jan 18 at 21:25
add a comment |
For anyone who runs across this, I had the latest version of VirtualBox and after reading through some of the forum posts on virtualbox.org found there is an extension pack that has updates for PXE that doesn't install when you check for updates. I downloaded it and installed it and am now able to successfully boot PXE like normal without having to go through Clonezilla lol.
answered Jul 14 '12 at 4:40
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
For anyone who runs across this, I had the latest version of VirtualBox and after reading through some of the forum posts on virtualbox.org found there is an extension pack that has updates for PXE that doesn't install when you check for updates. I downloaded it and installed it and am now able to successfully boot PXE like normal without having to go through Clonezilla lol.
answered Jul 14 '12 at 4:40
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
answered Jul 14 '12 at 4:40
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
answered Jul 14 '12 at 4:40
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
answered Jul 14 '12 at 4:40
Seth HallSeth Hall
6116
6116
This is the solution in my case. Thanks a million! It was nothing to do with promiscuous mode NICs or wacky bridged adapter configurations (although I think a VBox bridged adapter might be required). For the benefit of others arriving here via web searches, Extension Packs for old releases—such as the version in the repos of your "Long-Term Service" Linux distro—may be downloaded here.
– TheDudeAbides
Jan 18 at 21:25
add a comment |
This is the solution in my case. Thanks a million! It was nothing to do with promiscuous mode NICs or wacky bridged adapter configurations (although I think a VBox bridged adapter might be required). For the benefit of others arriving here via web searches, Extension Packs for old releases—such as the version in the repos of your "Long-Term Service" Linux distro—may be downloaded here.
– TheDudeAbides
Jan 18 at 21:25
This is the solution in my case. Thanks a million! It was nothing to do with promiscuous mode NICs or wacky bridged adapter configurations (although I think a VBox bridged adapter might be required). For the benefit of others arriving here via web searches, Extension Packs for old releases—such as the version in the repos of your "Long-Term Service" Linux distro—may be downloaded here.
– TheDudeAbides
Jan 18 at 21:25
This is the solution in my case. Thanks a million! It was nothing to do with promiscuous mode NICs or wacky bridged adapter configurations (although I think a VBox bridged adapter might be required). For the benefit of others arriving here via web searches, Extension Packs for old releases—such as the version in the repos of your "Long-Term Service" Linux distro—may be downloaded here.
– TheDudeAbides
Jan 18 at 21:25
add a comment |
This is not an answer, but a long comment, with pictures. Seth's self-answer is the answer.
But I've been hunting for this "solution" for probably a year, and there are so many threads in the VirtualBox forums about PXE boot problems, I just wonder how many of them are caused by just not having the non-free Extension Pack installed. Some rainy day I'm going to link them all here. :)
I had installed the Debian-friendly open-source version from my Linux distro's package manager (virtualbox 5.1.38-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1), without having downloaded the corresponding Extension Pack.
The open-source "iPXE" PXE ROM that comes with the open-source version of VirtualBox looks like this when it boots up:
However, that boot ROM seems not to work with the (Windows) workstation imaging environment at my institution. It seems to load a boot image initially, but I always end up with the following fatal error:
Windows failed to start.
Status: 0xc000000f
Info: A required device isn't connected or can't be accessed.
The (presumably secret IP-containing) PXE boot ROM that comes with the Oracle Extension pack, however, does not have this problem, and loads the workstation imaging environment without apparent issue. Its boot messages look like this:
and
The rest of the boot process after that proceeds fine.
answered Jan 18 at 21:16
TheDudeAbidesTheDudeAbides
36349
add a comment |
This is not an answer, but a long comment, with pictures. Seth's self-answer is the answer.
But I've been hunting for this "solution" for probably a year, and there are so many threads in the VirtualBox forums about PXE boot problems, I just wonder how many of them are caused by just not having the non-free Extension Pack installed. Some rainy day I'm going to link them all here. :)
I had installed the Debian-friendly open-source version from my Linux distro's package manager (virtualbox 5.1.38-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1), without having downloaded the corresponding Extension Pack.
The open-source "iPXE" PXE ROM that comes with the open-source version of VirtualBox looks like this when it boots up:
However, that boot ROM seems not to work with the (Windows) workstation imaging environment at my institution. It seems to load a boot image initially, but I always end up with the following fatal error:
Windows failed to start.
Status: 0xc000000f
Info: A required device isn't connected or can't be accessed.
The (presumably secret IP-containing) PXE boot ROM that comes with the Oracle Extension pack, however, does not have this problem, and loads the workstation imaging environment without apparent issue. Its boot messages look like this:
and
The rest of the boot process after that proceeds fine.
answered Jan 18 at 21:16
TheDudeAbidesTheDudeAbides
36349
add a comment |
This is not an answer, but a long comment, with pictures. Seth's self-answer is the answer.
But I've been hunting for this "solution" for probably a year, and there are so many threads in the VirtualBox forums about PXE boot problems, I just wonder how many of them are caused by just not having the non-free Extension Pack installed. Some rainy day I'm going to link them all here. :)
I had installed the Debian-friendly open-source version from my Linux distro's package manager (virtualbox 5.1.38-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1), without having downloaded the corresponding Extension Pack.
The open-source "iPXE" PXE ROM that comes with the open-source version of VirtualBox looks like this when it boots up:
However, that boot ROM seems not to work with the (Windows) workstation imaging environment at my institution. It seems to load a boot image initially, but I always end up with the following fatal error:
Windows failed to start.
Status: 0xc000000f
Info: A required device isn't connected or can't be accessed.
The (presumably secret IP-containing) PXE boot ROM that comes with the Oracle Extension pack, however, does not have this problem, and loads the workstation imaging environment without apparent issue. Its boot messages look like this:
and
The rest of the boot process after that proceeds fine.
answered Jan 18 at 21:16
TheDudeAbidesTheDudeAbides
36349
This is not an answer, but a long comment, with pictures. Seth's self-answer is the answer.
But I've been hunting for this "solution" for probably a year, and there are so many threads in the VirtualBox forums about PXE boot problems, I just wonder how many of them are caused by just not having the non-free Extension Pack installed. Some rainy day I'm going to link them all here. :)
I had installed the Debian-friendly open-source version from my Linux distro's package manager (virtualbox 5.1.38-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1), without having downloaded the corresponding Extension Pack.
The open-source "iPXE" PXE ROM that comes with the open-source version of VirtualBox looks like this when it boots up:
However, that boot ROM seems not to work with the (Windows) workstation imaging environment at my institution. It seems to load a boot image initially, but I always end up with the following fatal error:
Windows failed to start.
Status: 0xc000000f
Info: A required device isn't connected or can't be accessed.
The (presumably secret IP-containing) PXE boot ROM that comes with the Oracle Extension pack, however, does not have this problem, and loads the workstation imaging environment without apparent issue. Its boot messages look like this:
and
The rest of the boot process after that proceeds fine.
answered Jan 18 at 21:16
TheDudeAbidesTheDudeAbides
36349
edited Jan 18 at 21:26
answered Jan 18 at 21:16
TheDudeAbidesTheDudeAbides
36349
answered Jan 18 at 21:16
TheDudeAbidesTheDudeAbides
36349
answered Jan 18 at 21:16
TheDudeAbidesTheDudeAbides
36349
36349
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f448700%2fsetting-up-virtualbox-guest-for-pxe-boot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
