Etiquette around loan refinance - decision is going to cost first broker a lot of commission





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







13















We are in the process of doing a refinance. However, we just took out the original mortgage loan recently. The new loan is 3/8 of a point better than the original loan and we are going to save a lot of money in interest payments.



I learned recently that this is going to cost the originator of the first loan quite a bit of money. I feel bad about it, but also, I didn't know at the time I started the refinance that there was a penalty for the originator if I pay off the balance of the first mortgage loan early; no one mentioned this during the process.



Is there etiquette around how I should handle this? Can anyone with knowledge of the loan origination industry explain how much money there is to be gained or lost in an early refinance? The first originator described the loss as "huge" but I don't know if they are exaggerating or what that would entail.



edit according to this answer the penalty may be between 1-3% of the loan value. Does that sound right? https://money.stackexchange.com/a/101707/84070










share|improve this question




















  • 9





    I always speak first to the current lender to see if they will match rate and do a no-cost refi or streamlined refi or whatever they want to call it. If not, then move on, why feel sorry for someone that is charging you more than the market dictates they should?

    – Hart CO
    Apr 4 at 15:40






  • 9





    Is it going to cost the loan originator in that they won't be making future profit off you, or is it going to cost you a penalty to get out of the original loan? The first sounds likely, but that's not your problem, the second also sounds likely and is your problem.

    – AndyT
    Apr 4 at 15:40






  • 2





    Apparently the commission for loan origination depends on how long the person holds the loan for. If the borrower pays back the loan early (as I am doing to refinance) they lose the commission. I'm trying to figure out what the exact details are as I'm not a loan originator.

    – Esta Close
    Apr 4 at 15:45






  • 4





    Welcome new user. I was just wondering, are you a personal friend of the loan originator person?? Or is it just "someone at the bank" ??

    – Fattie
    Apr 4 at 16:51






  • 4





    So they're losing the commission on this deal, because the loan didn't last long. But if rates have recently dropped, then presumably people will be clamoring to refi, so new business (and new commissions) should be easily had in this market. I really wouldn't worry about them.

    – CactusCake
    Apr 4 at 17:24


















13















We are in the process of doing a refinance. However, we just took out the original mortgage loan recently. The new loan is 3/8 of a point better than the original loan and we are going to save a lot of money in interest payments.



I learned recently that this is going to cost the originator of the first loan quite a bit of money. I feel bad about it, but also, I didn't know at the time I started the refinance that there was a penalty for the originator if I pay off the balance of the first mortgage loan early; no one mentioned this during the process.



Is there etiquette around how I should handle this? Can anyone with knowledge of the loan origination industry explain how much money there is to be gained or lost in an early refinance? The first originator described the loss as "huge" but I don't know if they are exaggerating or what that would entail.



edit according to this answer the penalty may be between 1-3% of the loan value. Does that sound right? https://money.stackexchange.com/a/101707/84070










share|improve this question




















  • 9





    I always speak first to the current lender to see if they will match rate and do a no-cost refi or streamlined refi or whatever they want to call it. If not, then move on, why feel sorry for someone that is charging you more than the market dictates they should?

    – Hart CO
    Apr 4 at 15:40






  • 9





    Is it going to cost the loan originator in that they won't be making future profit off you, or is it going to cost you a penalty to get out of the original loan? The first sounds likely, but that's not your problem, the second also sounds likely and is your problem.

    – AndyT
    Apr 4 at 15:40






  • 2





    Apparently the commission for loan origination depends on how long the person holds the loan for. If the borrower pays back the loan early (as I am doing to refinance) they lose the commission. I'm trying to figure out what the exact details are as I'm not a loan originator.

    – Esta Close
    Apr 4 at 15:45






  • 4





    Welcome new user. I was just wondering, are you a personal friend of the loan originator person?? Or is it just "someone at the bank" ??

    – Fattie
    Apr 4 at 16:51






  • 4





    So they're losing the commission on this deal, because the loan didn't last long. But if rates have recently dropped, then presumably people will be clamoring to refi, so new business (and new commissions) should be easily had in this market. I really wouldn't worry about them.

    – CactusCake
    Apr 4 at 17:24














13












13








13








We are in the process of doing a refinance. However, we just took out the original mortgage loan recently. The new loan is 3/8 of a point better than the original loan and we are going to save a lot of money in interest payments.



I learned recently that this is going to cost the originator of the first loan quite a bit of money. I feel bad about it, but also, I didn't know at the time I started the refinance that there was a penalty for the originator if I pay off the balance of the first mortgage loan early; no one mentioned this during the process.



Is there etiquette around how I should handle this? Can anyone with knowledge of the loan origination industry explain how much money there is to be gained or lost in an early refinance? The first originator described the loss as "huge" but I don't know if they are exaggerating or what that would entail.



edit according to this answer the penalty may be between 1-3% of the loan value. Does that sound right? https://money.stackexchange.com/a/101707/84070










share|improve this question
















We are in the process of doing a refinance. However, we just took out the original mortgage loan recently. The new loan is 3/8 of a point better than the original loan and we are going to save a lot of money in interest payments.



I learned recently that this is going to cost the originator of the first loan quite a bit of money. I feel bad about it, but also, I didn't know at the time I started the refinance that there was a penalty for the originator if I pay off the balance of the first mortgage loan early; no one mentioned this during the process.



Is there etiquette around how I should handle this? Can anyone with knowledge of the loan origination industry explain how much money there is to be gained or lost in an early refinance? The first originator described the loss as "huge" but I don't know if they are exaggerating or what that would entail.



edit according to this answer the penalty may be between 1-3% of the loan value. Does that sound right? https://money.stackexchange.com/a/101707/84070







mortgage refinance application-process






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 5 at 2:20









smci

1667




1667










asked Apr 4 at 15:31









Esta CloseEsta Close

6614




6614








  • 9





    I always speak first to the current lender to see if they will match rate and do a no-cost refi or streamlined refi or whatever they want to call it. If not, then move on, why feel sorry for someone that is charging you more than the market dictates they should?

    – Hart CO
    Apr 4 at 15:40






  • 9





    Is it going to cost the loan originator in that they won't be making future profit off you, or is it going to cost you a penalty to get out of the original loan? The first sounds likely, but that's not your problem, the second also sounds likely and is your problem.

    – AndyT
    Apr 4 at 15:40






  • 2





    Apparently the commission for loan origination depends on how long the person holds the loan for. If the borrower pays back the loan early (as I am doing to refinance) they lose the commission. I'm trying to figure out what the exact details are as I'm not a loan originator.

    – Esta Close
    Apr 4 at 15:45






  • 4





    Welcome new user. I was just wondering, are you a personal friend of the loan originator person?? Or is it just "someone at the bank" ??

    – Fattie
    Apr 4 at 16:51






  • 4





    So they're losing the commission on this deal, because the loan didn't last long. But if rates have recently dropped, then presumably people will be clamoring to refi, so new business (and new commissions) should be easily had in this market. I really wouldn't worry about them.

    – CactusCake
    Apr 4 at 17:24














  • 9





    I always speak first to the current lender to see if they will match rate and do a no-cost refi or streamlined refi or whatever they want to call it. If not, then move on, why feel sorry for someone that is charging you more than the market dictates they should?

    – Hart CO
    Apr 4 at 15:40






  • 9





    Is it going to cost the loan originator in that they won't be making future profit off you, or is it going to cost you a penalty to get out of the original loan? The first sounds likely, but that's not your problem, the second also sounds likely and is your problem.

    – AndyT
    Apr 4 at 15:40






  • 2





    Apparently the commission for loan origination depends on how long the person holds the loan for. If the borrower pays back the loan early (as I am doing to refinance) they lose the commission. I'm trying to figure out what the exact details are as I'm not a loan originator.

    – Esta Close
    Apr 4 at 15:45






  • 4





    Welcome new user. I was just wondering, are you a personal friend of the loan originator person?? Or is it just "someone at the bank" ??

    – Fattie
    Apr 4 at 16:51






  • 4





    So they're losing the commission on this deal, because the loan didn't last long. But if rates have recently dropped, then presumably people will be clamoring to refi, so new business (and new commissions) should be easily had in this market. I really wouldn't worry about them.

    – CactusCake
    Apr 4 at 17:24








9




9





I always speak first to the current lender to see if they will match rate and do a no-cost refi or streamlined refi or whatever they want to call it. If not, then move on, why feel sorry for someone that is charging you more than the market dictates they should?

– Hart CO
Apr 4 at 15:40





I always speak first to the current lender to see if they will match rate and do a no-cost refi or streamlined refi or whatever they want to call it. If not, then move on, why feel sorry for someone that is charging you more than the market dictates they should?

– Hart CO
Apr 4 at 15:40




9




9





Is it going to cost the loan originator in that they won't be making future profit off you, or is it going to cost you a penalty to get out of the original loan? The first sounds likely, but that's not your problem, the second also sounds likely and is your problem.

– AndyT
Apr 4 at 15:40





Is it going to cost the loan originator in that they won't be making future profit off you, or is it going to cost you a penalty to get out of the original loan? The first sounds likely, but that's not your problem, the second also sounds likely and is your problem.

– AndyT
Apr 4 at 15:40




2




2





Apparently the commission for loan origination depends on how long the person holds the loan for. If the borrower pays back the loan early (as I am doing to refinance) they lose the commission. I'm trying to figure out what the exact details are as I'm not a loan originator.

– Esta Close
Apr 4 at 15:45





Apparently the commission for loan origination depends on how long the person holds the loan for. If the borrower pays back the loan early (as I am doing to refinance) they lose the commission. I'm trying to figure out what the exact details are as I'm not a loan originator.

– Esta Close
Apr 4 at 15:45




4




4





Welcome new user. I was just wondering, are you a personal friend of the loan originator person?? Or is it just "someone at the bank" ??

– Fattie
Apr 4 at 16:51





Welcome new user. I was just wondering, are you a personal friend of the loan originator person?? Or is it just "someone at the bank" ??

– Fattie
Apr 4 at 16:51




4




4





So they're losing the commission on this deal, because the loan didn't last long. But if rates have recently dropped, then presumably people will be clamoring to refi, so new business (and new commissions) should be easily had in this market. I really wouldn't worry about them.

– CactusCake
Apr 4 at 17:24





So they're losing the commission on this deal, because the loan didn't last long. But if rates have recently dropped, then presumably people will be clamoring to refi, so new business (and new commissions) should be easily had in this market. I really wouldn't worry about them.

– CactusCake
Apr 4 at 17:24










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















24














I have a friend who is a mortgage broker. At the company he works for, if one of his loans is paid off within 6 months of origination, he loses his commission. It's only happened to him a few times in 9 years, and he had to repay the commission on those loans in the form of future paycheck reductions. In his case 2 large loans happened in the same month after rates dropped significantly and he didn't get paid for 60 days. So it definitely can hurt the loan officer that sold you the loan.



I suspect they know this is coming though, as rates have dropped significantly this year.



I would contact your broker, explain the situation and see if they can refi for you. They may have contracts with their banks that don't allow them to, and if they can't then ask your broker what the cutoff date is and if it isn't too far into the future, consider waiting. If you don't want to wait that long, I think you should do what's best for you, but it may be nice to at least let your broker know so they can plan for it accordingly. Of course, you aren't under any obligation to notify them if you aren't comfortable doing so.



Update: regarding your last question, the broker getting a 1-2% commission is certainly plausible (though 3% seems a little high in the current market). You can figure on a 4% loan, in the first 6 months the bank makes just under 2% in interest. It's believable that a bank might be willing to pay the first 6 months of interest to a broker as a finders fee, but only if the loan lasts 6 months.






share|improve this answer





















  • 5





    Thanks! I reached out and explained what is going on, and we're chatting about it. 6 months is probably too long for us to wait.

    – Esta Close
    Apr 4 at 16:10








  • 4





    @EstaClose - That's great. I think you've nailed the best possible etiquette by talking to the broker.

    – TTT
    Apr 4 at 16:12






  • 2





    While I guess it's good if you can with little cost to yourself support someone who'd otherwise potentially go without pay for months, I could also make the argument that you're propping up abhorrent business practices. Maybe more people need to pay off their loans early so brokers will learn not to get themselves into such terrible contracts.

    – curiousdannii
    Apr 4 at 23:55



















4














The first lender simply gets all their money back when you refinance - where is the "huge loss" in that? Then, they can lend that money to someone else, benefiting from closing costs once again.



So don't feel bad but pay close attention to all the associated costs and penalties, and weigh that against the savings in interest.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3





    Nothing, it's entirely on the backend. Still if someone is going to be out 10X so I can save X, and I'd previously had a good relationship with that person, it seems less than ideal. I'm trying to figure out what the multiplier is.

    – Esta Close
    Apr 4 at 16:00






  • 7





    Regarding your first sentence, it's not the bank that takes the loss, it's the sales person losing their commission.

    – TTT
    Apr 4 at 16:35






  • 7





    @Barmar It's not really like that IMO. They are offered commissions based on the contract lasting for a certain amount of time. If they are getting the bonus and spending it before the contract reaches that time, it's kinda on them. Losing a commission that you haven't satisfied the conditions on isn't the same as being docked pay really.

    – JMac
    Apr 4 at 18:17






  • 6





    @JPhi1618 If your entire livelihood rests on commissions that can be legally taken away within 6 months due to customer decisions, then it's time to look for a new job, not try to convince your customers to take a worse deal. I have my doubts that they operate solely on commission; but if they do, even bringing up this issue to clients seems like bad business practice. The issue is that, if the money can still be taken away regardless your own actions, it's not safe to consider it money that you've "made". OP taking a worse deal because of someone else's lack of financial plans isn't fair.

    – JMac
    Apr 4 at 19:42






  • 4





    The originating company probably does that on purpose so they can guilt people into keeping higher-rate loans.

    – not_a_comcast_employee
    Apr 4 at 21:47





















1














It's helpful to take a holistic view of this business. OP's link to one of the answer on this site is pretty good albeit brief.



Your lender originates your firstmortgage, and then sell it to some financial institution, who might hold it or package it and sell it by pieces (securitized). All these transactions were priced with the rates (and the expectation of future rates) back then.



Now rates have unexpectedly dropped. This raises the value of all the existing mortgages, and benifits the buyers. However, without a prepayment penalty, from your perspective as the mortgagor, you have the option to prepay the mortgage and basically "buy it back" from whoever owns the mortgage now at the face value. (Of course you would fund that purchase with another mortgage, ie refinance, at a more favorable rate, and thus at a lower cost).



Essentially this is a call option that moved in the money and it makes all the sense for you to exercise this option. The buyers though certainly wouldn't like missing the opportunity to make more money. But keep in mind that investors in this business are all sophisticated institutions. They know the embedded options and the risk associated. In fact they often assumes a fixed percentage of mortgage would be prepayed no matter what. So all the "losses" are just a cost of business that they already baked into the assumptions and prices.



Still, you can see why lenders would prefer you don't refinance, and can set up the terms to try to steer you away (e.g. prepayment penalty). But I'm not sure how docking the loan officers' pay would help, otherthan incentivizing them to lie about refinance (as one of the comments pointed out). Certainly in your case, you shouldn't feel responsible for the awkward position that the lender put their LO in.






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "93"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107361%2fetiquette-around-loan-refinance-decision-is-going-to-cost-first-broker-a-lot-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    24














    I have a friend who is a mortgage broker. At the company he works for, if one of his loans is paid off within 6 months of origination, he loses his commission. It's only happened to him a few times in 9 years, and he had to repay the commission on those loans in the form of future paycheck reductions. In his case 2 large loans happened in the same month after rates dropped significantly and he didn't get paid for 60 days. So it definitely can hurt the loan officer that sold you the loan.



    I suspect they know this is coming though, as rates have dropped significantly this year.



    I would contact your broker, explain the situation and see if they can refi for you. They may have contracts with their banks that don't allow them to, and if they can't then ask your broker what the cutoff date is and if it isn't too far into the future, consider waiting. If you don't want to wait that long, I think you should do what's best for you, but it may be nice to at least let your broker know so they can plan for it accordingly. Of course, you aren't under any obligation to notify them if you aren't comfortable doing so.



    Update: regarding your last question, the broker getting a 1-2% commission is certainly plausible (though 3% seems a little high in the current market). You can figure on a 4% loan, in the first 6 months the bank makes just under 2% in interest. It's believable that a bank might be willing to pay the first 6 months of interest to a broker as a finders fee, but only if the loan lasts 6 months.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 5





      Thanks! I reached out and explained what is going on, and we're chatting about it. 6 months is probably too long for us to wait.

      – Esta Close
      Apr 4 at 16:10








    • 4





      @EstaClose - That's great. I think you've nailed the best possible etiquette by talking to the broker.

      – TTT
      Apr 4 at 16:12






    • 2





      While I guess it's good if you can with little cost to yourself support someone who'd otherwise potentially go without pay for months, I could also make the argument that you're propping up abhorrent business practices. Maybe more people need to pay off their loans early so brokers will learn not to get themselves into such terrible contracts.

      – curiousdannii
      Apr 4 at 23:55
















    24














    I have a friend who is a mortgage broker. At the company he works for, if one of his loans is paid off within 6 months of origination, he loses his commission. It's only happened to him a few times in 9 years, and he had to repay the commission on those loans in the form of future paycheck reductions. In his case 2 large loans happened in the same month after rates dropped significantly and he didn't get paid for 60 days. So it definitely can hurt the loan officer that sold you the loan.



    I suspect they know this is coming though, as rates have dropped significantly this year.



    I would contact your broker, explain the situation and see if they can refi for you. They may have contracts with their banks that don't allow them to, and if they can't then ask your broker what the cutoff date is and if it isn't too far into the future, consider waiting. If you don't want to wait that long, I think you should do what's best for you, but it may be nice to at least let your broker know so they can plan for it accordingly. Of course, you aren't under any obligation to notify them if you aren't comfortable doing so.



    Update: regarding your last question, the broker getting a 1-2% commission is certainly plausible (though 3% seems a little high in the current market). You can figure on a 4% loan, in the first 6 months the bank makes just under 2% in interest. It's believable that a bank might be willing to pay the first 6 months of interest to a broker as a finders fee, but only if the loan lasts 6 months.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 5





      Thanks! I reached out and explained what is going on, and we're chatting about it. 6 months is probably too long for us to wait.

      – Esta Close
      Apr 4 at 16:10








    • 4





      @EstaClose - That's great. I think you've nailed the best possible etiquette by talking to the broker.

      – TTT
      Apr 4 at 16:12






    • 2





      While I guess it's good if you can with little cost to yourself support someone who'd otherwise potentially go without pay for months, I could also make the argument that you're propping up abhorrent business practices. Maybe more people need to pay off their loans early so brokers will learn not to get themselves into such terrible contracts.

      – curiousdannii
      Apr 4 at 23:55














    24












    24








    24







    I have a friend who is a mortgage broker. At the company he works for, if one of his loans is paid off within 6 months of origination, he loses his commission. It's only happened to him a few times in 9 years, and he had to repay the commission on those loans in the form of future paycheck reductions. In his case 2 large loans happened in the same month after rates dropped significantly and he didn't get paid for 60 days. So it definitely can hurt the loan officer that sold you the loan.



    I suspect they know this is coming though, as rates have dropped significantly this year.



    I would contact your broker, explain the situation and see if they can refi for you. They may have contracts with their banks that don't allow them to, and if they can't then ask your broker what the cutoff date is and if it isn't too far into the future, consider waiting. If you don't want to wait that long, I think you should do what's best for you, but it may be nice to at least let your broker know so they can plan for it accordingly. Of course, you aren't under any obligation to notify them if you aren't comfortable doing so.



    Update: regarding your last question, the broker getting a 1-2% commission is certainly plausible (though 3% seems a little high in the current market). You can figure on a 4% loan, in the first 6 months the bank makes just under 2% in interest. It's believable that a bank might be willing to pay the first 6 months of interest to a broker as a finders fee, but only if the loan lasts 6 months.






    share|improve this answer















    I have a friend who is a mortgage broker. At the company he works for, if one of his loans is paid off within 6 months of origination, he loses his commission. It's only happened to him a few times in 9 years, and he had to repay the commission on those loans in the form of future paycheck reductions. In his case 2 large loans happened in the same month after rates dropped significantly and he didn't get paid for 60 days. So it definitely can hurt the loan officer that sold you the loan.



    I suspect they know this is coming though, as rates have dropped significantly this year.



    I would contact your broker, explain the situation and see if they can refi for you. They may have contracts with their banks that don't allow them to, and if they can't then ask your broker what the cutoff date is and if it isn't too far into the future, consider waiting. If you don't want to wait that long, I think you should do what's best for you, but it may be nice to at least let your broker know so they can plan for it accordingly. Of course, you aren't under any obligation to notify them if you aren't comfortable doing so.



    Update: regarding your last question, the broker getting a 1-2% commission is certainly plausible (though 3% seems a little high in the current market). You can figure on a 4% loan, in the first 6 months the bank makes just under 2% in interest. It's believable that a bank might be willing to pay the first 6 months of interest to a broker as a finders fee, but only if the loan lasts 6 months.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 4 at 17:19

























    answered Apr 4 at 16:06









    TTTTTT

    30k45997




    30k45997








    • 5





      Thanks! I reached out and explained what is going on, and we're chatting about it. 6 months is probably too long for us to wait.

      – Esta Close
      Apr 4 at 16:10








    • 4





      @EstaClose - That's great. I think you've nailed the best possible etiquette by talking to the broker.

      – TTT
      Apr 4 at 16:12






    • 2





      While I guess it's good if you can with little cost to yourself support someone who'd otherwise potentially go without pay for months, I could also make the argument that you're propping up abhorrent business practices. Maybe more people need to pay off their loans early so brokers will learn not to get themselves into such terrible contracts.

      – curiousdannii
      Apr 4 at 23:55














    • 5





      Thanks! I reached out and explained what is going on, and we're chatting about it. 6 months is probably too long for us to wait.

      – Esta Close
      Apr 4 at 16:10








    • 4





      @EstaClose - That's great. I think you've nailed the best possible etiquette by talking to the broker.

      – TTT
      Apr 4 at 16:12






    • 2





      While I guess it's good if you can with little cost to yourself support someone who'd otherwise potentially go without pay for months, I could also make the argument that you're propping up abhorrent business practices. Maybe more people need to pay off their loans early so brokers will learn not to get themselves into such terrible contracts.

      – curiousdannii
      Apr 4 at 23:55








    5




    5





    Thanks! I reached out and explained what is going on, and we're chatting about it. 6 months is probably too long for us to wait.

    – Esta Close
    Apr 4 at 16:10







    Thanks! I reached out and explained what is going on, and we're chatting about it. 6 months is probably too long for us to wait.

    – Esta Close
    Apr 4 at 16:10






    4




    4





    @EstaClose - That's great. I think you've nailed the best possible etiquette by talking to the broker.

    – TTT
    Apr 4 at 16:12





    @EstaClose - That's great. I think you've nailed the best possible etiquette by talking to the broker.

    – TTT
    Apr 4 at 16:12




    2




    2





    While I guess it's good if you can with little cost to yourself support someone who'd otherwise potentially go without pay for months, I could also make the argument that you're propping up abhorrent business practices. Maybe more people need to pay off their loans early so brokers will learn not to get themselves into such terrible contracts.

    – curiousdannii
    Apr 4 at 23:55





    While I guess it's good if you can with little cost to yourself support someone who'd otherwise potentially go without pay for months, I could also make the argument that you're propping up abhorrent business practices. Maybe more people need to pay off their loans early so brokers will learn not to get themselves into such terrible contracts.

    – curiousdannii
    Apr 4 at 23:55













    4














    The first lender simply gets all their money back when you refinance - where is the "huge loss" in that? Then, they can lend that money to someone else, benefiting from closing costs once again.



    So don't feel bad but pay close attention to all the associated costs and penalties, and weigh that against the savings in interest.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 3





      Nothing, it's entirely on the backend. Still if someone is going to be out 10X so I can save X, and I'd previously had a good relationship with that person, it seems less than ideal. I'm trying to figure out what the multiplier is.

      – Esta Close
      Apr 4 at 16:00






    • 7





      Regarding your first sentence, it's not the bank that takes the loss, it's the sales person losing their commission.

      – TTT
      Apr 4 at 16:35






    • 7





      @Barmar It's not really like that IMO. They are offered commissions based on the contract lasting for a certain amount of time. If they are getting the bonus and spending it before the contract reaches that time, it's kinda on them. Losing a commission that you haven't satisfied the conditions on isn't the same as being docked pay really.

      – JMac
      Apr 4 at 18:17






    • 6





      @JPhi1618 If your entire livelihood rests on commissions that can be legally taken away within 6 months due to customer decisions, then it's time to look for a new job, not try to convince your customers to take a worse deal. I have my doubts that they operate solely on commission; but if they do, even bringing up this issue to clients seems like bad business practice. The issue is that, if the money can still be taken away regardless your own actions, it's not safe to consider it money that you've "made". OP taking a worse deal because of someone else's lack of financial plans isn't fair.

      – JMac
      Apr 4 at 19:42






    • 4





      The originating company probably does that on purpose so they can guilt people into keeping higher-rate loans.

      – not_a_comcast_employee
      Apr 4 at 21:47


















    4














    The first lender simply gets all their money back when you refinance - where is the "huge loss" in that? Then, they can lend that money to someone else, benefiting from closing costs once again.



    So don't feel bad but pay close attention to all the associated costs and penalties, and weigh that against the savings in interest.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 3





      Nothing, it's entirely on the backend. Still if someone is going to be out 10X so I can save X, and I'd previously had a good relationship with that person, it seems less than ideal. I'm trying to figure out what the multiplier is.

      – Esta Close
      Apr 4 at 16:00






    • 7





      Regarding your first sentence, it's not the bank that takes the loss, it's the sales person losing their commission.

      – TTT
      Apr 4 at 16:35






    • 7





      @Barmar It's not really like that IMO. They are offered commissions based on the contract lasting for a certain amount of time. If they are getting the bonus and spending it before the contract reaches that time, it's kinda on them. Losing a commission that you haven't satisfied the conditions on isn't the same as being docked pay really.

      – JMac
      Apr 4 at 18:17






    • 6





      @JPhi1618 If your entire livelihood rests on commissions that can be legally taken away within 6 months due to customer decisions, then it's time to look for a new job, not try to convince your customers to take a worse deal. I have my doubts that they operate solely on commission; but if they do, even bringing up this issue to clients seems like bad business practice. The issue is that, if the money can still be taken away regardless your own actions, it's not safe to consider it money that you've "made". OP taking a worse deal because of someone else's lack of financial plans isn't fair.

      – JMac
      Apr 4 at 19:42






    • 4





      The originating company probably does that on purpose so they can guilt people into keeping higher-rate loans.

      – not_a_comcast_employee
      Apr 4 at 21:47
















    4












    4








    4







    The first lender simply gets all their money back when you refinance - where is the "huge loss" in that? Then, they can lend that money to someone else, benefiting from closing costs once again.



    So don't feel bad but pay close attention to all the associated costs and penalties, and weigh that against the savings in interest.






    share|improve this answer













    The first lender simply gets all their money back when you refinance - where is the "huge loss" in that? Then, they can lend that money to someone else, benefiting from closing costs once again.



    So don't feel bad but pay close attention to all the associated costs and penalties, and weigh that against the savings in interest.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 4 at 15:44









    void_ptrvoid_ptr

    1,338411




    1,338411








    • 3





      Nothing, it's entirely on the backend. Still if someone is going to be out 10X so I can save X, and I'd previously had a good relationship with that person, it seems less than ideal. I'm trying to figure out what the multiplier is.

      – Esta Close
      Apr 4 at 16:00






    • 7





      Regarding your first sentence, it's not the bank that takes the loss, it's the sales person losing their commission.

      – TTT
      Apr 4 at 16:35






    • 7





      @Barmar It's not really like that IMO. They are offered commissions based on the contract lasting for a certain amount of time. If they are getting the bonus and spending it before the contract reaches that time, it's kinda on them. Losing a commission that you haven't satisfied the conditions on isn't the same as being docked pay really.

      – JMac
      Apr 4 at 18:17






    • 6





      @JPhi1618 If your entire livelihood rests on commissions that can be legally taken away within 6 months due to customer decisions, then it's time to look for a new job, not try to convince your customers to take a worse deal. I have my doubts that they operate solely on commission; but if they do, even bringing up this issue to clients seems like bad business practice. The issue is that, if the money can still be taken away regardless your own actions, it's not safe to consider it money that you've "made". OP taking a worse deal because of someone else's lack of financial plans isn't fair.

      – JMac
      Apr 4 at 19:42






    • 4





      The originating company probably does that on purpose so they can guilt people into keeping higher-rate loans.

      – not_a_comcast_employee
      Apr 4 at 21:47
















    • 3





      Nothing, it's entirely on the backend. Still if someone is going to be out 10X so I can save X, and I'd previously had a good relationship with that person, it seems less than ideal. I'm trying to figure out what the multiplier is.

      – Esta Close
      Apr 4 at 16:00






    • 7





      Regarding your first sentence, it's not the bank that takes the loss, it's the sales person losing their commission.

      – TTT
      Apr 4 at 16:35






    • 7





      @Barmar It's not really like that IMO. They are offered commissions based on the contract lasting for a certain amount of time. If they are getting the bonus and spending it before the contract reaches that time, it's kinda on them. Losing a commission that you haven't satisfied the conditions on isn't the same as being docked pay really.

      – JMac
      Apr 4 at 18:17






    • 6





      @JPhi1618 If your entire livelihood rests on commissions that can be legally taken away within 6 months due to customer decisions, then it's time to look for a new job, not try to convince your customers to take a worse deal. I have my doubts that they operate solely on commission; but if they do, even bringing up this issue to clients seems like bad business practice. The issue is that, if the money can still be taken away regardless your own actions, it's not safe to consider it money that you've "made". OP taking a worse deal because of someone else's lack of financial plans isn't fair.

      – JMac
      Apr 4 at 19:42






    • 4





      The originating company probably does that on purpose so they can guilt people into keeping higher-rate loans.

      – not_a_comcast_employee
      Apr 4 at 21:47










    3




    3





    Nothing, it's entirely on the backend. Still if someone is going to be out 10X so I can save X, and I'd previously had a good relationship with that person, it seems less than ideal. I'm trying to figure out what the multiplier is.

    – Esta Close
    Apr 4 at 16:00





    Nothing, it's entirely on the backend. Still if someone is going to be out 10X so I can save X, and I'd previously had a good relationship with that person, it seems less than ideal. I'm trying to figure out what the multiplier is.

    – Esta Close
    Apr 4 at 16:00




    7




    7





    Regarding your first sentence, it's not the bank that takes the loss, it's the sales person losing their commission.

    – TTT
    Apr 4 at 16:35





    Regarding your first sentence, it's not the bank that takes the loss, it's the sales person losing their commission.

    – TTT
    Apr 4 at 16:35




    7




    7





    @Barmar It's not really like that IMO. They are offered commissions based on the contract lasting for a certain amount of time. If they are getting the bonus and spending it before the contract reaches that time, it's kinda on them. Losing a commission that you haven't satisfied the conditions on isn't the same as being docked pay really.

    – JMac
    Apr 4 at 18:17





    @Barmar It's not really like that IMO. They are offered commissions based on the contract lasting for a certain amount of time. If they are getting the bonus and spending it before the contract reaches that time, it's kinda on them. Losing a commission that you haven't satisfied the conditions on isn't the same as being docked pay really.

    – JMac
    Apr 4 at 18:17




    6




    6





    @JPhi1618 If your entire livelihood rests on commissions that can be legally taken away within 6 months due to customer decisions, then it's time to look for a new job, not try to convince your customers to take a worse deal. I have my doubts that they operate solely on commission; but if they do, even bringing up this issue to clients seems like bad business practice. The issue is that, if the money can still be taken away regardless your own actions, it's not safe to consider it money that you've "made". OP taking a worse deal because of someone else's lack of financial plans isn't fair.

    – JMac
    Apr 4 at 19:42





    @JPhi1618 If your entire livelihood rests on commissions that can be legally taken away within 6 months due to customer decisions, then it's time to look for a new job, not try to convince your customers to take a worse deal. I have my doubts that they operate solely on commission; but if they do, even bringing up this issue to clients seems like bad business practice. The issue is that, if the money can still be taken away regardless your own actions, it's not safe to consider it money that you've "made". OP taking a worse deal because of someone else's lack of financial plans isn't fair.

    – JMac
    Apr 4 at 19:42




    4




    4





    The originating company probably does that on purpose so they can guilt people into keeping higher-rate loans.

    – not_a_comcast_employee
    Apr 4 at 21:47







    The originating company probably does that on purpose so they can guilt people into keeping higher-rate loans.

    – not_a_comcast_employee
    Apr 4 at 21:47













    1














    It's helpful to take a holistic view of this business. OP's link to one of the answer on this site is pretty good albeit brief.



    Your lender originates your firstmortgage, and then sell it to some financial institution, who might hold it or package it and sell it by pieces (securitized). All these transactions were priced with the rates (and the expectation of future rates) back then.



    Now rates have unexpectedly dropped. This raises the value of all the existing mortgages, and benifits the buyers. However, without a prepayment penalty, from your perspective as the mortgagor, you have the option to prepay the mortgage and basically "buy it back" from whoever owns the mortgage now at the face value. (Of course you would fund that purchase with another mortgage, ie refinance, at a more favorable rate, and thus at a lower cost).



    Essentially this is a call option that moved in the money and it makes all the sense for you to exercise this option. The buyers though certainly wouldn't like missing the opportunity to make more money. But keep in mind that investors in this business are all sophisticated institutions. They know the embedded options and the risk associated. In fact they often assumes a fixed percentage of mortgage would be prepayed no matter what. So all the "losses" are just a cost of business that they already baked into the assumptions and prices.



    Still, you can see why lenders would prefer you don't refinance, and can set up the terms to try to steer you away (e.g. prepayment penalty). But I'm not sure how docking the loan officers' pay would help, otherthan incentivizing them to lie about refinance (as one of the comments pointed out). Certainly in your case, you shouldn't feel responsible for the awkward position that the lender put their LO in.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      It's helpful to take a holistic view of this business. OP's link to one of the answer on this site is pretty good albeit brief.



      Your lender originates your firstmortgage, and then sell it to some financial institution, who might hold it or package it and sell it by pieces (securitized). All these transactions were priced with the rates (and the expectation of future rates) back then.



      Now rates have unexpectedly dropped. This raises the value of all the existing mortgages, and benifits the buyers. However, without a prepayment penalty, from your perspective as the mortgagor, you have the option to prepay the mortgage and basically "buy it back" from whoever owns the mortgage now at the face value. (Of course you would fund that purchase with another mortgage, ie refinance, at a more favorable rate, and thus at a lower cost).



      Essentially this is a call option that moved in the money and it makes all the sense for you to exercise this option. The buyers though certainly wouldn't like missing the opportunity to make more money. But keep in mind that investors in this business are all sophisticated institutions. They know the embedded options and the risk associated. In fact they often assumes a fixed percentage of mortgage would be prepayed no matter what. So all the "losses" are just a cost of business that they already baked into the assumptions and prices.



      Still, you can see why lenders would prefer you don't refinance, and can set up the terms to try to steer you away (e.g. prepayment penalty). But I'm not sure how docking the loan officers' pay would help, otherthan incentivizing them to lie about refinance (as one of the comments pointed out). Certainly in your case, you shouldn't feel responsible for the awkward position that the lender put their LO in.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        It's helpful to take a holistic view of this business. OP's link to one of the answer on this site is pretty good albeit brief.



        Your lender originates your firstmortgage, and then sell it to some financial institution, who might hold it or package it and sell it by pieces (securitized). All these transactions were priced with the rates (and the expectation of future rates) back then.



        Now rates have unexpectedly dropped. This raises the value of all the existing mortgages, and benifits the buyers. However, without a prepayment penalty, from your perspective as the mortgagor, you have the option to prepay the mortgage and basically "buy it back" from whoever owns the mortgage now at the face value. (Of course you would fund that purchase with another mortgage, ie refinance, at a more favorable rate, and thus at a lower cost).



        Essentially this is a call option that moved in the money and it makes all the sense for you to exercise this option. The buyers though certainly wouldn't like missing the opportunity to make more money. But keep in mind that investors in this business are all sophisticated institutions. They know the embedded options and the risk associated. In fact they often assumes a fixed percentage of mortgage would be prepayed no matter what. So all the "losses" are just a cost of business that they already baked into the assumptions and prices.



        Still, you can see why lenders would prefer you don't refinance, and can set up the terms to try to steer you away (e.g. prepayment penalty). But I'm not sure how docking the loan officers' pay would help, otherthan incentivizing them to lie about refinance (as one of the comments pointed out). Certainly in your case, you shouldn't feel responsible for the awkward position that the lender put their LO in.






        share|improve this answer













        It's helpful to take a holistic view of this business. OP's link to one of the answer on this site is pretty good albeit brief.



        Your lender originates your firstmortgage, and then sell it to some financial institution, who might hold it or package it and sell it by pieces (securitized). All these transactions were priced with the rates (and the expectation of future rates) back then.



        Now rates have unexpectedly dropped. This raises the value of all the existing mortgages, and benifits the buyers. However, without a prepayment penalty, from your perspective as the mortgagor, you have the option to prepay the mortgage and basically "buy it back" from whoever owns the mortgage now at the face value. (Of course you would fund that purchase with another mortgage, ie refinance, at a more favorable rate, and thus at a lower cost).



        Essentially this is a call option that moved in the money and it makes all the sense for you to exercise this option. The buyers though certainly wouldn't like missing the opportunity to make more money. But keep in mind that investors in this business are all sophisticated institutions. They know the embedded options and the risk associated. In fact they often assumes a fixed percentage of mortgage would be prepayed no matter what. So all the "losses" are just a cost of business that they already baked into the assumptions and prices.



        Still, you can see why lenders would prefer you don't refinance, and can set up the terms to try to steer you away (e.g. prepayment penalty). But I'm not sure how docking the loan officers' pay would help, otherthan incentivizing them to lie about refinance (as one of the comments pointed out). Certainly in your case, you shouldn't feel responsible for the awkward position that the lender put their LO in.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 5 at 14:55









        xiaomyxiaomy

        1,501617




        1,501617






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107361%2fetiquette-around-loan-refinance-decision-is-going-to-cost-first-broker-a-lot-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]