Is “How to achieve…” vs “Why achieve…” grammatical? [on hold]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







-1















I would know if the following sentences are correct and the grammatical explanation if not:




  1. "How to achieve this function?"

  2. "How achieve this function?"

  3. "How must this function be  achieved?"


versus




  1. "Why to achieve this function?"

  2. "Why achieve this function?"

  3. "Why must this function be  achieved?"


Is there any other suggestion if my sentences are wrong?






grammaticality







share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, Dan Bron, Jason Bassford, JJJ, Mitch 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Dan Bron, JJJ, Mitch

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • 2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

    – Bella Swan
    Mar 27 at 12:52


















-1















I would know if the following sentences are correct and the grammatical explanation if not:




  1. "How to achieve this function?"

  2. "How achieve this function?"

  3. "How must this function be  achieved?"


versus




  1. "Why to achieve this function?"

  2. "Why achieve this function?"

  3. "Why must this function be  achieved?"


Is there any other suggestion if my sentences are wrong?






grammaticality







share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, Dan Bron, Jason Bassford, JJJ, Mitch 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Dan Bron, JJJ, Mitch

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • 2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

    – Bella Swan
    Mar 27 at 12:52














-1












-1








-1








I would know if the following sentences are correct and the grammatical explanation if not:




  1. "How to achieve this function?"

  2. "How achieve this function?"

  3. "How must this function be  achieved?"


versus




  1. "Why to achieve this function?"

  2. "Why achieve this function?"

  3. "Why must this function be  achieved?"


Is there any other suggestion if my sentences are wrong?






grammaticality







share|improve this question














I would know if the following sentences are correct and the grammatical explanation if not:




  1. "How to achieve this function?"

  2. "How achieve this function?"

  3. "How must this function be  achieved?"


versus




  1. "Why to achieve this function?"

  2. "Why achieve this function?"

  3. "Why must this function be  achieved?"


Is there any other suggestion if my sentences are wrong?






grammaticality




grammaticality






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 27 at 12:04









nadreohnadreoh

1




1




put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, Dan Bron, Jason Bassford, JJJ, Mitch 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Dan Bron, JJJ, Mitch

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, Dan Bron, Jason Bassford, JJJ, Mitch 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Dan Bron, JJJ, Mitch

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

    – Bella Swan
    Mar 27 at 12:52



















  • 2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

    – Bella Swan
    Mar 27 at 12:52

















2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

– Bella Swan
Mar 27 at 12:52





2 is definitely wrong, and I have my doubts about 4 too.

– Bella Swan
Mar 27 at 12:52










0






active

oldest

votes

















0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

-

Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 total noob sorry any help greatly appreciated. I keep getting this "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'." heres my codes code one CREATE TABLE supplier ( supplierID INT PRIMARY KEY, ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), price DECIMAL (5,2), ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); code two CREATE TABLE orders ( orderID INT PRIMARY KEY, customerID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES customer(customerID), ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), orderDate date, ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); Ive run out of stuff to try other than dumbing it down to uselessness. ...
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout ...
Read more

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 17 1 Today, I found myself discussing what students should have "under their belts" during a lecture, and I wondered to myself if there was some inappropriate undertone here that I might be unaware of. Question : What is the origin of the phrase "under your belt"? A google search revealed some webpages (e.g. [1]) that assert its origin is related to consumption of food -- once a meal has been eaten, it's under your belt (which is a relief). However, with such websites, I have no way to determine fact from "random guy on the internet making stuff up". etymology idioms ...
Read more