Is it legal to reject WSDLs where namespaces differs only in file extension (the part after the last dot)?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1















I have a complicated web application which uses many web services. I have to start using a new one. The WSDL of this new service defines a target namespace which is almost the same as a namespace used in an older WSDL. Only the part after the last dot differs.



The package names deduced by JAXB are the same for them, and the ObjectFactory generated from the second one overwrites the other.



For example, one wsdl has a target namespace "http://foo.com/a.b.c", another one has "http://foo.com/a.b.c_2". Then the java package name will be com.foo.a.b for both namespaces which is a kind of collision.



I checked the JAXB spec and found this ( https://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/jcp/jaxb-2.0-fr-eval-oth-JSpec/jaxb-2_0-fr-spec.pdf?AuthParam=1542978637_f7c18a1892b0ff022071acdab6259bdd ) :




D.5.1 Mapping from a Namespace URI An XML namespace is represented by
a URI. Since XML Namespace will be mapped to a Java package, it is
necessary to specify a default mapping from a URI to a Java package
name. The URI format is described in [RFC2396]. The following steps
describe how to map a URI to a Java package name. The example URI,
http://www.acme.com/go/espeak.xsd, is used to illustrate each step.





  1. Remove the scheme and ":" part from the beginning of the URI, if present. Since there is no formal syntax to identify the optional URI
    scheme, restrict the schemes to be removed to case insensitive checks
    for schemes “http” and “urn”.



    //www.acme.com/go/espeak.xsd




  2. Remove the trailing file type, one of .?? or .??? or .html.



    //www.acme.com/go/espeak



    ...






Probably there are workarounds for this on my side, but I would like to have the provider of the web services to "correct" the situation by using "proper" namespaces which are not differing in only the last part (file name extension in JAXB parlance?).



I am looking for arguments for "my case".










share|improve this question































    1















    I have a complicated web application which uses many web services. I have to start using a new one. The WSDL of this new service defines a target namespace which is almost the same as a namespace used in an older WSDL. Only the part after the last dot differs.



    The package names deduced by JAXB are the same for them, and the ObjectFactory generated from the second one overwrites the other.



    For example, one wsdl has a target namespace "http://foo.com/a.b.c", another one has "http://foo.com/a.b.c_2". Then the java package name will be com.foo.a.b for both namespaces which is a kind of collision.



    I checked the JAXB spec and found this ( https://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/jcp/jaxb-2.0-fr-eval-oth-JSpec/jaxb-2_0-fr-spec.pdf?AuthParam=1542978637_f7c18a1892b0ff022071acdab6259bdd ) :




    D.5.1 Mapping from a Namespace URI An XML namespace is represented by
    a URI. Since XML Namespace will be mapped to a Java package, it is
    necessary to specify a default mapping from a URI to a Java package
    name. The URI format is described in [RFC2396]. The following steps
    describe how to map a URI to a Java package name. The example URI,
    http://www.acme.com/go/espeak.xsd, is used to illustrate each step.





    1. Remove the scheme and ":" part from the beginning of the URI, if present. Since there is no formal syntax to identify the optional URI
      scheme, restrict the schemes to be removed to case insensitive checks
      for schemes “http” and “urn”.



      //www.acme.com/go/espeak.xsd




    2. Remove the trailing file type, one of .?? or .??? or .html.



      //www.acme.com/go/espeak



      ...






    Probably there are workarounds for this on my side, but I would like to have the provider of the web services to "correct" the situation by using "proper" namespaces which are not differing in only the last part (file name extension in JAXB parlance?).



    I am looking for arguments for "my case".










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1








      I have a complicated web application which uses many web services. I have to start using a new one. The WSDL of this new service defines a target namespace which is almost the same as a namespace used in an older WSDL. Only the part after the last dot differs.



      The package names deduced by JAXB are the same for them, and the ObjectFactory generated from the second one overwrites the other.



      For example, one wsdl has a target namespace "http://foo.com/a.b.c", another one has "http://foo.com/a.b.c_2". Then the java package name will be com.foo.a.b for both namespaces which is a kind of collision.



      I checked the JAXB spec and found this ( https://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/jcp/jaxb-2.0-fr-eval-oth-JSpec/jaxb-2_0-fr-spec.pdf?AuthParam=1542978637_f7c18a1892b0ff022071acdab6259bdd ) :




      D.5.1 Mapping from a Namespace URI An XML namespace is represented by
      a URI. Since XML Namespace will be mapped to a Java package, it is
      necessary to specify a default mapping from a URI to a Java package
      name. The URI format is described in [RFC2396]. The following steps
      describe how to map a URI to a Java package name. The example URI,
      http://www.acme.com/go/espeak.xsd, is used to illustrate each step.





      1. Remove the scheme and ":" part from the beginning of the URI, if present. Since there is no formal syntax to identify the optional URI
        scheme, restrict the schemes to be removed to case insensitive checks
        for schemes “http” and “urn”.



        //www.acme.com/go/espeak.xsd




      2. Remove the trailing file type, one of .?? or .??? or .html.



        //www.acme.com/go/espeak



        ...






      Probably there are workarounds for this on my side, but I would like to have the provider of the web services to "correct" the situation by using "proper" namespaces which are not differing in only the last part (file name extension in JAXB parlance?).



      I am looking for arguments for "my case".










      share|improve this question
















      I have a complicated web application which uses many web services. I have to start using a new one. The WSDL of this new service defines a target namespace which is almost the same as a namespace used in an older WSDL. Only the part after the last dot differs.



      The package names deduced by JAXB are the same for them, and the ObjectFactory generated from the second one overwrites the other.



      For example, one wsdl has a target namespace "http://foo.com/a.b.c", another one has "http://foo.com/a.b.c_2". Then the java package name will be com.foo.a.b for both namespaces which is a kind of collision.



      I checked the JAXB spec and found this ( https://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/jcp/jaxb-2.0-fr-eval-oth-JSpec/jaxb-2_0-fr-spec.pdf?AuthParam=1542978637_f7c18a1892b0ff022071acdab6259bdd ) :




      D.5.1 Mapping from a Namespace URI An XML namespace is represented by
      a URI. Since XML Namespace will be mapped to a Java package, it is
      necessary to specify a default mapping from a URI to a Java package
      name. The URI format is described in [RFC2396]. The following steps
      describe how to map a URI to a Java package name. The example URI,
      http://www.acme.com/go/espeak.xsd, is used to illustrate each step.





      1. Remove the scheme and ":" part from the beginning of the URI, if present. Since there is no formal syntax to identify the optional URI
        scheme, restrict the schemes to be removed to case insensitive checks
        for schemes “http” and “urn”.



        //www.acme.com/go/espeak.xsd




      2. Remove the trailing file type, one of .?? or .??? or .html.



        //www.acme.com/go/espeak



        ...






      Probably there are workarounds for this on my side, but I would like to have the provider of the web services to "correct" the situation by using "proper" namespaces which are not differing in only the last part (file name extension in JAXB parlance?).



      I am looking for arguments for "my case".







      java jaxb wsdl






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 23 '18 at 14:48







      riskop

















      asked Nov 23 '18 at 14:23









      riskopriskop

      993824




      993824
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Please see Namespaces in XML 1.0 §2.3 Comparing URI References:




          URI references identifying namespaces are compared when determining whether a name belongs to a given namespace, and whether two names belong to the same namespace. [Definition: The two URIs are treated as strings, and they are identical if and only if the strings are identical, that is, if they are the same sequence of characters. ] The comparison is case-sensitive, and no %-escaping is done or undone.




          If your namespaces "only differ in file extension", these are different namespaces. If your tools generate the same package for them, the problem is on your side, not on the side of the WSDL author.



          So no, you do not have really good arguments for "your case", sorry.



          The fix is trivial: simply config target package per namespace. See the following question, for instance:




          CXF: How to change package of WSDL imported XML Schema using JAXB external binding file?







          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53448433%2fis-it-legal-to-reject-wsdls-where-namespaces-differs-only-in-file-extension-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Please see Namespaces in XML 1.0 §2.3 Comparing URI References:




            URI references identifying namespaces are compared when determining whether a name belongs to a given namespace, and whether two names belong to the same namespace. [Definition: The two URIs are treated as strings, and they are identical if and only if the strings are identical, that is, if they are the same sequence of characters. ] The comparison is case-sensitive, and no %-escaping is done or undone.




            If your namespaces "only differ in file extension", these are different namespaces. If your tools generate the same package for them, the problem is on your side, not on the side of the WSDL author.



            So no, you do not have really good arguments for "your case", sorry.



            The fix is trivial: simply config target package per namespace. See the following question, for instance:




            CXF: How to change package of WSDL imported XML Schema using JAXB external binding file?







            share|improve this answer




























              1














              Please see Namespaces in XML 1.0 §2.3 Comparing URI References:




              URI references identifying namespaces are compared when determining whether a name belongs to a given namespace, and whether two names belong to the same namespace. [Definition: The two URIs are treated as strings, and they are identical if and only if the strings are identical, that is, if they are the same sequence of characters. ] The comparison is case-sensitive, and no %-escaping is done or undone.




              If your namespaces "only differ in file extension", these are different namespaces. If your tools generate the same package for them, the problem is on your side, not on the side of the WSDL author.



              So no, you do not have really good arguments for "your case", sorry.



              The fix is trivial: simply config target package per namespace. See the following question, for instance:




              CXF: How to change package of WSDL imported XML Schema using JAXB external binding file?







              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                Please see Namespaces in XML 1.0 §2.3 Comparing URI References:




                URI references identifying namespaces are compared when determining whether a name belongs to a given namespace, and whether two names belong to the same namespace. [Definition: The two URIs are treated as strings, and they are identical if and only if the strings are identical, that is, if they are the same sequence of characters. ] The comparison is case-sensitive, and no %-escaping is done or undone.




                If your namespaces "only differ in file extension", these are different namespaces. If your tools generate the same package for them, the problem is on your side, not on the side of the WSDL author.



                So no, you do not have really good arguments for "your case", sorry.



                The fix is trivial: simply config target package per namespace. See the following question, for instance:




                CXF: How to change package of WSDL imported XML Schema using JAXB external binding file?







                share|improve this answer













                Please see Namespaces in XML 1.0 §2.3 Comparing URI References:




                URI references identifying namespaces are compared when determining whether a name belongs to a given namespace, and whether two names belong to the same namespace. [Definition: The two URIs are treated as strings, and they are identical if and only if the strings are identical, that is, if they are the same sequence of characters. ] The comparison is case-sensitive, and no %-escaping is done or undone.




                If your namespaces "only differ in file extension", these are different namespaces. If your tools generate the same package for them, the problem is on your side, not on the side of the WSDL author.



                So no, you do not have really good arguments for "your case", sorry.



                The fix is trivial: simply config target package per namespace. See the following question, for instance:




                CXF: How to change package of WSDL imported XML Schema using JAXB external binding file?








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 23 '18 at 21:17









                lexicorelexicore

                31.9k889158




                31.9k889158
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53448433%2fis-it-legal-to-reject-wsdls-where-namespaces-differs-only-in-file-extension-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                    Alcedinidae

                    Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]