What is a word to describe inefficient communication?
Example 1 - When reviewing résumés I don't want someone to use 1.5 pages to describe one job.
Example 2 - When a person uses excessive description to answer a simple question.
single-word-requests
|
show 1 more comment
Example 1 - When reviewing résumés I don't want someone to use 1.5 pages to describe one job.
Example 2 - When a person uses excessive description to answer a simple question.
single-word-requests
3
Technically, the documents have "low information density".
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 18:41
2
(Or, if you want to get even more technical, "high entropy".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 19:13
2
When describing someone who elaborates beyond necessity, I've heard it said: "Ask him for the time and he'll tell you how to build a clock". (-:
– Jim Mack
Apr 25 '16 at 20:41
@HotLicks: High entropy would actually indicate a high amount of information, not a low information density.
– user2357112
Apr 26 '16 at 17:26
1
StenevL, The word you're looking for is "long". As in "the cv is too long" or the "description is too long". Nothing else is needed here. Indeed anything else would be too long.
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
|
show 1 more comment
Example 1 - When reviewing résumés I don't want someone to use 1.5 pages to describe one job.
Example 2 - When a person uses excessive description to answer a simple question.
single-word-requests
Example 1 - When reviewing résumés I don't want someone to use 1.5 pages to describe one job.
Example 2 - When a person uses excessive description to answer a simple question.
single-word-requests
single-word-requests
edited Jul 26 '17 at 0:18
tchrist♦
108k28290464
108k28290464
asked Apr 25 '16 at 14:16
Steven L
9115
9115
3
Technically, the documents have "low information density".
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 18:41
2
(Or, if you want to get even more technical, "high entropy".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 19:13
2
When describing someone who elaborates beyond necessity, I've heard it said: "Ask him for the time and he'll tell you how to build a clock". (-:
– Jim Mack
Apr 25 '16 at 20:41
@HotLicks: High entropy would actually indicate a high amount of information, not a low information density.
– user2357112
Apr 26 '16 at 17:26
1
StenevL, The word you're looking for is "long". As in "the cv is too long" or the "description is too long". Nothing else is needed here. Indeed anything else would be too long.
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
|
show 1 more comment
3
Technically, the documents have "low information density".
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 18:41
2
(Or, if you want to get even more technical, "high entropy".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 19:13
2
When describing someone who elaborates beyond necessity, I've heard it said: "Ask him for the time and he'll tell you how to build a clock". (-:
– Jim Mack
Apr 25 '16 at 20:41
@HotLicks: High entropy would actually indicate a high amount of information, not a low information density.
– user2357112
Apr 26 '16 at 17:26
1
StenevL, The word you're looking for is "long". As in "the cv is too long" or the "description is too long". Nothing else is needed here. Indeed anything else would be too long.
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
3
3
Technically, the documents have "low information density".
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 18:41
Technically, the documents have "low information density".
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 18:41
2
2
(Or, if you want to get even more technical, "high entropy".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 19:13
(Or, if you want to get even more technical, "high entropy".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 19:13
2
2
When describing someone who elaborates beyond necessity, I've heard it said: "Ask him for the time and he'll tell you how to build a clock". (-:
– Jim Mack
Apr 25 '16 at 20:41
When describing someone who elaborates beyond necessity, I've heard it said: "Ask him for the time and he'll tell you how to build a clock". (-:
– Jim Mack
Apr 25 '16 at 20:41
@HotLicks: High entropy would actually indicate a high amount of information, not a low information density.
– user2357112
Apr 26 '16 at 17:26
@HotLicks: High entropy would actually indicate a high amount of information, not a low information density.
– user2357112
Apr 26 '16 at 17:26
1
1
StenevL, The word you're looking for is "long". As in "the cv is too long" or the "description is too long". Nothing else is needed here. Indeed anything else would be too long.
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
StenevL, The word you're looking for is "long". As in "the cv is too long" or the "description is too long". Nothing else is needed here. Indeed anything else would be too long.
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
|
show 1 more comment
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
Taking a page from Araucaria, I'd suggest long-winded:
using too many words in speaking or writing
from m-w.com
So you could say, for example:
I don't like such long-winded resumes.
He gave a really long-winded answer to what I meant as a simple question.
Pat's long-windedness can be really off-putting.
1
long-winded is long-winded. Just say "long".
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
@JoeBlow Wow! 12 answers, I'm getting winded just looking at them!
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:48
@Fattie: the joke itself aside, there is a difference here. "Long-winded" carries the connotation of it being longer than would have been necessary, whereas "long" can be an objective measure of length without carrying the connotation of being too long. In that sense, "long-winded" is not long-winded.
– Flater
Jul 26 '17 at 9:57
add a comment |
Using the word verbose may work for you, for example:
"For a 1 mark question, your answer was verbose."
As antonyms, you could use laconic or concise, e.g.
"Credit will be given for a concise description of the problem."
6
I would like to add that verbosity is not inherently bad; overly verbose would be a much clearer term.
– Stephan Bijzitter
Apr 25 '16 at 21:21
Funny, I know "verbose" as a term used in programming. Some logging tools have filters so you only see what you're looking for, setting it to "verbose" means you see everything without filtering out anything you don't need :)
– Kevin
Apr 26 '16 at 6:51
2
Stephan: Given verbose means more words than needed, I think overly verbose is not required, but I think it's quite common. My favourite annoyance is "very true"!
– Jon
Apr 26 '16 at 17:12
I totally agree with you.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:49
add a comment |
Adding to other good suggestions, when someone uses too many (unnecessary) words for a simple description, the adjective wordy could be used which means:
Using or expressed in rather too many words: 'a wordy and repetitive
account'
[Oxford Online Dictionary]
Example: Is your resume too wordy? and Ways to Tighten the Too-Wordy Resume
add a comment |
Some great answers here.
In engineering we would say that the resume had a low signal to noise ratio. It's a fairly derogatory term for something or someone that is unnecessarily verbose.
Signal to noise ratio is a very good answer. I like that! For some dumb reason I want a single word to work with on this.
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:30
@Steven L How about saying "noisy", if you want a single word
– ab2
Apr 26 '16 at 4:00
1
Why use one word when you can use 5 just as easily?
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:50
add a comment |
Such long-winded communication may be described as prolix. Here is the definition from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
Full Definition of prolix
1: unduly prolonged or drawn out : too long
2: marked by or using an excess of words
Examples of prolix in a sentence
The speech was unnecessarily prolix.
< a person known for habitually transforming brief anecdotes into prolix sagas that exhaust their listeners >
The noun form of this word is prolixity. You could say for example that you disapprove of prolixity in resumes.
I'm also looking for something that has a somewhat negative connotation. Where does prolix fall in line on that?
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:27
3
@StevenL, in my estimation it would generally fall into the "huh?" category; it is not a widely-used word and the average person probably doesn't know what it means. (If someone does know what it means, they would most likely take it as a negative comment.)
– Hellion
Apr 25 '16 at 21:57
2
@StevenL It definitely has a negative connotation. (That's why the dictionary definitions always have some word like unduly, too or excess in them).
– Araucaria
Apr 26 '16 at 7:01
right, prolix is negative. but prolix is .. prolix. All you have to say is "your cv is far too long"
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:34
add a comment |
What you are referring to seem to be superfluous details.
add a comment |
If you are looking for a noun, noise comes to mind:
irrelevant or meaningless data or output occurring along with desired information
(definition 2e from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/noise)
add a comment |
As an alternative to long-winded you might consider bloated. Which may help to suggest that extra content was unnecessary, not simply inefficiently presented (if that is your desire).
excessive in size or amount.
- "the company trimmed its bloated labor force"
add a comment |
Obfuscation refers to too many details or levels of abstraction that obscure the real meaning. Obfuscation is often done purposely. Eschew obfuscation.
add a comment |
tautology- saying same thing over and over again by using synonyms.
Similarly, superfluity, pleonasm, verbosity also convey the same.
Usage-
He uses a lot of words to show off his huge vocabulary realizing little that his tautology is irritating to others.
Verbiage is a great word! And it has a negative feeling, if not connotation, so you can use it without seeming overly, excessively, redundantly judgmental.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
add a comment |
lengthy descriptions. long-drawn-out descriptions. If there are too many words, I think the word lengthy works fine. For me, prolix and verbose and long-winded would not be used here as those words are about communications not descriptions per se.
Typically, in English a short description contrasts with a lengthy or long description.
add a comment |
Discursive. It's an antonym for concise.
1
And it sounds a bit like 'curse'.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
add a comment |
On alieniloquent
(not to mention alieniloquently, alieniloquence, alieniloquacious, alieniloque, alieniloquize, alieniloquy, alieniloquial, alieniloquially, alieniloquist, alieniloquism, alieniloquacious, alieniloquaciously, et alios)
Per Oxford Dictionaries Online, an alieniloquy is
an instance of straying from the subject one is supposed to be talking about; rambling of evasive talk.
Aliens are “others”, of course, so this is talking about other things if you would. It derives from
post-classical Latin alieniloquium allegory from classical Latin aliēnus + ‑loquium, after Hellenistic Greek ἀλληγορία.
Since all nouns ending in -iloquy have corresponding derived adjectives ending in ‑iloquent, the world you’re looking for is therefore necessarily alieniloquent — pronounced /ˌeɪlɪəˈnɪləkwənt/.
If that’s not quite the right part of speech, a great number of derivative terms can be similarly derived in a perfectly regular fashion. Unless of course you prefer a term a tad less...grandiloquent? :-)
add a comment |
protected by Matt E. Эллен♦ Apr 26 '16 at 15:17
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Taking a page from Araucaria, I'd suggest long-winded:
using too many words in speaking or writing
from m-w.com
So you could say, for example:
I don't like such long-winded resumes.
He gave a really long-winded answer to what I meant as a simple question.
Pat's long-windedness can be really off-putting.
1
long-winded is long-winded. Just say "long".
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
@JoeBlow Wow! 12 answers, I'm getting winded just looking at them!
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:48
@Fattie: the joke itself aside, there is a difference here. "Long-winded" carries the connotation of it being longer than would have been necessary, whereas "long" can be an objective measure of length without carrying the connotation of being too long. In that sense, "long-winded" is not long-winded.
– Flater
Jul 26 '17 at 9:57
add a comment |
Taking a page from Araucaria, I'd suggest long-winded:
using too many words in speaking or writing
from m-w.com
So you could say, for example:
I don't like such long-winded resumes.
He gave a really long-winded answer to what I meant as a simple question.
Pat's long-windedness can be really off-putting.
1
long-winded is long-winded. Just say "long".
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
@JoeBlow Wow! 12 answers, I'm getting winded just looking at them!
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:48
@Fattie: the joke itself aside, there is a difference here. "Long-winded" carries the connotation of it being longer than would have been necessary, whereas "long" can be an objective measure of length without carrying the connotation of being too long. In that sense, "long-winded" is not long-winded.
– Flater
Jul 26 '17 at 9:57
add a comment |
Taking a page from Araucaria, I'd suggest long-winded:
using too many words in speaking or writing
from m-w.com
So you could say, for example:
I don't like such long-winded resumes.
He gave a really long-winded answer to what I meant as a simple question.
Pat's long-windedness can be really off-putting.
Taking a page from Araucaria, I'd suggest long-winded:
using too many words in speaking or writing
from m-w.com
So you could say, for example:
I don't like such long-winded resumes.
He gave a really long-winded answer to what I meant as a simple question.
Pat's long-windedness can be really off-putting.
answered Apr 25 '16 at 14:58
Hellion
52.9k13108196
52.9k13108196
1
long-winded is long-winded. Just say "long".
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
@JoeBlow Wow! 12 answers, I'm getting winded just looking at them!
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:48
@Fattie: the joke itself aside, there is a difference here. "Long-winded" carries the connotation of it being longer than would have been necessary, whereas "long" can be an objective measure of length without carrying the connotation of being too long. In that sense, "long-winded" is not long-winded.
– Flater
Jul 26 '17 at 9:57
add a comment |
1
long-winded is long-winded. Just say "long".
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
@JoeBlow Wow! 12 answers, I'm getting winded just looking at them!
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:48
@Fattie: the joke itself aside, there is a difference here. "Long-winded" carries the connotation of it being longer than would have been necessary, whereas "long" can be an objective measure of length without carrying the connotation of being too long. In that sense, "long-winded" is not long-winded.
– Flater
Jul 26 '17 at 9:57
1
1
long-winded is long-winded. Just say "long".
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
long-winded is long-winded. Just say "long".
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33
@JoeBlow Wow! 12 answers, I'm getting winded just looking at them!
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:48
@JoeBlow Wow! 12 answers, I'm getting winded just looking at them!
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:48
@Fattie: the joke itself aside, there is a difference here. "Long-winded" carries the connotation of it being longer than would have been necessary, whereas "long" can be an objective measure of length without carrying the connotation of being too long. In that sense, "long-winded" is not long-winded.
– Flater
Jul 26 '17 at 9:57
@Fattie: the joke itself aside, there is a difference here. "Long-winded" carries the connotation of it being longer than would have been necessary, whereas "long" can be an objective measure of length without carrying the connotation of being too long. In that sense, "long-winded" is not long-winded.
– Flater
Jul 26 '17 at 9:57
add a comment |
Using the word verbose may work for you, for example:
"For a 1 mark question, your answer was verbose."
As antonyms, you could use laconic or concise, e.g.
"Credit will be given for a concise description of the problem."
6
I would like to add that verbosity is not inherently bad; overly verbose would be a much clearer term.
– Stephan Bijzitter
Apr 25 '16 at 21:21
Funny, I know "verbose" as a term used in programming. Some logging tools have filters so you only see what you're looking for, setting it to "verbose" means you see everything without filtering out anything you don't need :)
– Kevin
Apr 26 '16 at 6:51
2
Stephan: Given verbose means more words than needed, I think overly verbose is not required, but I think it's quite common. My favourite annoyance is "very true"!
– Jon
Apr 26 '16 at 17:12
I totally agree with you.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:49
add a comment |
Using the word verbose may work for you, for example:
"For a 1 mark question, your answer was verbose."
As antonyms, you could use laconic or concise, e.g.
"Credit will be given for a concise description of the problem."
6
I would like to add that verbosity is not inherently bad; overly verbose would be a much clearer term.
– Stephan Bijzitter
Apr 25 '16 at 21:21
Funny, I know "verbose" as a term used in programming. Some logging tools have filters so you only see what you're looking for, setting it to "verbose" means you see everything without filtering out anything you don't need :)
– Kevin
Apr 26 '16 at 6:51
2
Stephan: Given verbose means more words than needed, I think overly verbose is not required, but I think it's quite common. My favourite annoyance is "very true"!
– Jon
Apr 26 '16 at 17:12
I totally agree with you.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:49
add a comment |
Using the word verbose may work for you, for example:
"For a 1 mark question, your answer was verbose."
As antonyms, you could use laconic or concise, e.g.
"Credit will be given for a concise description of the problem."
Using the word verbose may work for you, for example:
"For a 1 mark question, your answer was verbose."
As antonyms, you could use laconic or concise, e.g.
"Credit will be given for a concise description of the problem."
edited Apr 25 '16 at 16:00
Graffito
11.3k11741
11.3k11741
answered Apr 25 '16 at 14:26
Jon
41933
41933
6
I would like to add that verbosity is not inherently bad; overly verbose would be a much clearer term.
– Stephan Bijzitter
Apr 25 '16 at 21:21
Funny, I know "verbose" as a term used in programming. Some logging tools have filters so you only see what you're looking for, setting it to "verbose" means you see everything without filtering out anything you don't need :)
– Kevin
Apr 26 '16 at 6:51
2
Stephan: Given verbose means more words than needed, I think overly verbose is not required, but I think it's quite common. My favourite annoyance is "very true"!
– Jon
Apr 26 '16 at 17:12
I totally agree with you.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:49
add a comment |
6
I would like to add that verbosity is not inherently bad; overly verbose would be a much clearer term.
– Stephan Bijzitter
Apr 25 '16 at 21:21
Funny, I know "verbose" as a term used in programming. Some logging tools have filters so you only see what you're looking for, setting it to "verbose" means you see everything without filtering out anything you don't need :)
– Kevin
Apr 26 '16 at 6:51
2
Stephan: Given verbose means more words than needed, I think overly verbose is not required, but I think it's quite common. My favourite annoyance is "very true"!
– Jon
Apr 26 '16 at 17:12
I totally agree with you.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:49
6
6
I would like to add that verbosity is not inherently bad; overly verbose would be a much clearer term.
– Stephan Bijzitter
Apr 25 '16 at 21:21
I would like to add that verbosity is not inherently bad; overly verbose would be a much clearer term.
– Stephan Bijzitter
Apr 25 '16 at 21:21
Funny, I know "verbose" as a term used in programming. Some logging tools have filters so you only see what you're looking for, setting it to "verbose" means you see everything without filtering out anything you don't need :)
– Kevin
Apr 26 '16 at 6:51
Funny, I know "verbose" as a term used in programming. Some logging tools have filters so you only see what you're looking for, setting it to "verbose" means you see everything without filtering out anything you don't need :)
– Kevin
Apr 26 '16 at 6:51
2
2
Stephan: Given verbose means more words than needed, I think overly verbose is not required, but I think it's quite common. My favourite annoyance is "very true"!
– Jon
Apr 26 '16 at 17:12
Stephan: Given verbose means more words than needed, I think overly verbose is not required, but I think it's quite common. My favourite annoyance is "very true"!
– Jon
Apr 26 '16 at 17:12
I totally agree with you.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:49
I totally agree with you.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:49
add a comment |
Adding to other good suggestions, when someone uses too many (unnecessary) words for a simple description, the adjective wordy could be used which means:
Using or expressed in rather too many words: 'a wordy and repetitive
account'
[Oxford Online Dictionary]
Example: Is your resume too wordy? and Ways to Tighten the Too-Wordy Resume
add a comment |
Adding to other good suggestions, when someone uses too many (unnecessary) words for a simple description, the adjective wordy could be used which means:
Using or expressed in rather too many words: 'a wordy and repetitive
account'
[Oxford Online Dictionary]
Example: Is your resume too wordy? and Ways to Tighten the Too-Wordy Resume
add a comment |
Adding to other good suggestions, when someone uses too many (unnecessary) words for a simple description, the adjective wordy could be used which means:
Using or expressed in rather too many words: 'a wordy and repetitive
account'
[Oxford Online Dictionary]
Example: Is your resume too wordy? and Ways to Tighten the Too-Wordy Resume
Adding to other good suggestions, when someone uses too many (unnecessary) words for a simple description, the adjective wordy could be used which means:
Using or expressed in rather too many words: 'a wordy and repetitive
account'
[Oxford Online Dictionary]
Example: Is your resume too wordy? and Ways to Tighten the Too-Wordy Resume
answered Apr 25 '16 at 15:51
user140086
add a comment |
add a comment |
Some great answers here.
In engineering we would say that the resume had a low signal to noise ratio. It's a fairly derogatory term for something or someone that is unnecessarily verbose.
Signal to noise ratio is a very good answer. I like that! For some dumb reason I want a single word to work with on this.
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:30
@Steven L How about saying "noisy", if you want a single word
– ab2
Apr 26 '16 at 4:00
1
Why use one word when you can use 5 just as easily?
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:50
add a comment |
Some great answers here.
In engineering we would say that the resume had a low signal to noise ratio. It's a fairly derogatory term for something or someone that is unnecessarily verbose.
Signal to noise ratio is a very good answer. I like that! For some dumb reason I want a single word to work with on this.
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:30
@Steven L How about saying "noisy", if you want a single word
– ab2
Apr 26 '16 at 4:00
1
Why use one word when you can use 5 just as easily?
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:50
add a comment |
Some great answers here.
In engineering we would say that the resume had a low signal to noise ratio. It's a fairly derogatory term for something or someone that is unnecessarily verbose.
Some great answers here.
In engineering we would say that the resume had a low signal to noise ratio. It's a fairly derogatory term for something or someone that is unnecessarily verbose.
answered Apr 25 '16 at 20:41
cdunn
20114
20114
Signal to noise ratio is a very good answer. I like that! For some dumb reason I want a single word to work with on this.
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:30
@Steven L How about saying "noisy", if you want a single word
– ab2
Apr 26 '16 at 4:00
1
Why use one word when you can use 5 just as easily?
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:50
add a comment |
Signal to noise ratio is a very good answer. I like that! For some dumb reason I want a single word to work with on this.
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:30
@Steven L How about saying "noisy", if you want a single word
– ab2
Apr 26 '16 at 4:00
1
Why use one word when you can use 5 just as easily?
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:50
Signal to noise ratio is a very good answer. I like that! For some dumb reason I want a single word to work with on this.
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:30
Signal to noise ratio is a very good answer. I like that! For some dumb reason I want a single word to work with on this.
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:30
@Steven L How about saying "noisy", if you want a single word
– ab2
Apr 26 '16 at 4:00
@Steven L How about saying "noisy", if you want a single word
– ab2
Apr 26 '16 at 4:00
1
1
Why use one word when you can use 5 just as easily?
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:50
Why use one word when you can use 5 just as easily?
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:50
add a comment |
Such long-winded communication may be described as prolix. Here is the definition from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
Full Definition of prolix
1: unduly prolonged or drawn out : too long
2: marked by or using an excess of words
Examples of prolix in a sentence
The speech was unnecessarily prolix.
< a person known for habitually transforming brief anecdotes into prolix sagas that exhaust their listeners >
The noun form of this word is prolixity. You could say for example that you disapprove of prolixity in resumes.
I'm also looking for something that has a somewhat negative connotation. Where does prolix fall in line on that?
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:27
3
@StevenL, in my estimation it would generally fall into the "huh?" category; it is not a widely-used word and the average person probably doesn't know what it means. (If someone does know what it means, they would most likely take it as a negative comment.)
– Hellion
Apr 25 '16 at 21:57
2
@StevenL It definitely has a negative connotation. (That's why the dictionary definitions always have some word like unduly, too or excess in them).
– Araucaria
Apr 26 '16 at 7:01
right, prolix is negative. but prolix is .. prolix. All you have to say is "your cv is far too long"
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:34
add a comment |
Such long-winded communication may be described as prolix. Here is the definition from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
Full Definition of prolix
1: unduly prolonged or drawn out : too long
2: marked by or using an excess of words
Examples of prolix in a sentence
The speech was unnecessarily prolix.
< a person known for habitually transforming brief anecdotes into prolix sagas that exhaust their listeners >
The noun form of this word is prolixity. You could say for example that you disapprove of prolixity in resumes.
I'm also looking for something that has a somewhat negative connotation. Where does prolix fall in line on that?
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:27
3
@StevenL, in my estimation it would generally fall into the "huh?" category; it is not a widely-used word and the average person probably doesn't know what it means. (If someone does know what it means, they would most likely take it as a negative comment.)
– Hellion
Apr 25 '16 at 21:57
2
@StevenL It definitely has a negative connotation. (That's why the dictionary definitions always have some word like unduly, too or excess in them).
– Araucaria
Apr 26 '16 at 7:01
right, prolix is negative. but prolix is .. prolix. All you have to say is "your cv is far too long"
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:34
add a comment |
Such long-winded communication may be described as prolix. Here is the definition from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
Full Definition of prolix
1: unduly prolonged or drawn out : too long
2: marked by or using an excess of words
Examples of prolix in a sentence
The speech was unnecessarily prolix.
< a person known for habitually transforming brief anecdotes into prolix sagas that exhaust their listeners >
The noun form of this word is prolixity. You could say for example that you disapprove of prolixity in resumes.
Such long-winded communication may be described as prolix. Here is the definition from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
Full Definition of prolix
1: unduly prolonged or drawn out : too long
2: marked by or using an excess of words
Examples of prolix in a sentence
The speech was unnecessarily prolix.
< a person known for habitually transforming brief anecdotes into prolix sagas that exhaust their listeners >
The noun form of this word is prolixity. You could say for example that you disapprove of prolixity in resumes.
answered Apr 25 '16 at 14:36
Araucaria
35.2k969147
35.2k969147
I'm also looking for something that has a somewhat negative connotation. Where does prolix fall in line on that?
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:27
3
@StevenL, in my estimation it would generally fall into the "huh?" category; it is not a widely-used word and the average person probably doesn't know what it means. (If someone does know what it means, they would most likely take it as a negative comment.)
– Hellion
Apr 25 '16 at 21:57
2
@StevenL It definitely has a negative connotation. (That's why the dictionary definitions always have some word like unduly, too or excess in them).
– Araucaria
Apr 26 '16 at 7:01
right, prolix is negative. but prolix is .. prolix. All you have to say is "your cv is far too long"
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:34
add a comment |
I'm also looking for something that has a somewhat negative connotation. Where does prolix fall in line on that?
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:27
3
@StevenL, in my estimation it would generally fall into the "huh?" category; it is not a widely-used word and the average person probably doesn't know what it means. (If someone does know what it means, they would most likely take it as a negative comment.)
– Hellion
Apr 25 '16 at 21:57
2
@StevenL It definitely has a negative connotation. (That's why the dictionary definitions always have some word like unduly, too or excess in them).
– Araucaria
Apr 26 '16 at 7:01
right, prolix is negative. but prolix is .. prolix. All you have to say is "your cv is far too long"
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:34
I'm also looking for something that has a somewhat negative connotation. Where does prolix fall in line on that?
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:27
I'm also looking for something that has a somewhat negative connotation. Where does prolix fall in line on that?
– Steven L
Apr 25 '16 at 21:27
3
3
@StevenL, in my estimation it would generally fall into the "huh?" category; it is not a widely-used word and the average person probably doesn't know what it means. (If someone does know what it means, they would most likely take it as a negative comment.)
– Hellion
Apr 25 '16 at 21:57
@StevenL, in my estimation it would generally fall into the "huh?" category; it is not a widely-used word and the average person probably doesn't know what it means. (If someone does know what it means, they would most likely take it as a negative comment.)
– Hellion
Apr 25 '16 at 21:57
2
2
@StevenL It definitely has a negative connotation. (That's why the dictionary definitions always have some word like unduly, too or excess in them).
– Araucaria
Apr 26 '16 at 7:01
@StevenL It definitely has a negative connotation. (That's why the dictionary definitions always have some word like unduly, too or excess in them).
– Araucaria
Apr 26 '16 at 7:01
right, prolix is negative. but prolix is .. prolix. All you have to say is "your cv is far too long"
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:34
right, prolix is negative. but prolix is .. prolix. All you have to say is "your cv is far too long"
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:34
add a comment |
What you are referring to seem to be superfluous details.
add a comment |
What you are referring to seem to be superfluous details.
add a comment |
What you are referring to seem to be superfluous details.
What you are referring to seem to be superfluous details.
answered Apr 25 '16 at 17:52
user169498
612
612
add a comment |
add a comment |
If you are looking for a noun, noise comes to mind:
irrelevant or meaningless data or output occurring along with desired information
(definition 2e from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/noise)
add a comment |
If you are looking for a noun, noise comes to mind:
irrelevant or meaningless data or output occurring along with desired information
(definition 2e from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/noise)
add a comment |
If you are looking for a noun, noise comes to mind:
irrelevant or meaningless data or output occurring along with desired information
(definition 2e from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/noise)
If you are looking for a noun, noise comes to mind:
irrelevant or meaningless data or output occurring along with desired information
(definition 2e from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/noise)
answered Apr 25 '16 at 18:55
Jos
62938
62938
add a comment |
add a comment |
As an alternative to long-winded you might consider bloated. Which may help to suggest that extra content was unnecessary, not simply inefficiently presented (if that is your desire).
excessive in size or amount.
- "the company trimmed its bloated labor force"
add a comment |
As an alternative to long-winded you might consider bloated. Which may help to suggest that extra content was unnecessary, not simply inefficiently presented (if that is your desire).
excessive in size or amount.
- "the company trimmed its bloated labor force"
add a comment |
As an alternative to long-winded you might consider bloated. Which may help to suggest that extra content was unnecessary, not simply inefficiently presented (if that is your desire).
excessive in size or amount.
- "the company trimmed its bloated labor force"
As an alternative to long-winded you might consider bloated. Which may help to suggest that extra content was unnecessary, not simply inefficiently presented (if that is your desire).
excessive in size or amount.
- "the company trimmed its bloated labor force"
answered Apr 25 '16 at 20:21
Zach
1963
1963
add a comment |
add a comment |
Obfuscation refers to too many details or levels of abstraction that obscure the real meaning. Obfuscation is often done purposely. Eschew obfuscation.
add a comment |
Obfuscation refers to too many details or levels of abstraction that obscure the real meaning. Obfuscation is often done purposely. Eschew obfuscation.
add a comment |
Obfuscation refers to too many details or levels of abstraction that obscure the real meaning. Obfuscation is often done purposely. Eschew obfuscation.
Obfuscation refers to too many details or levels of abstraction that obscure the real meaning. Obfuscation is often done purposely. Eschew obfuscation.
answered Apr 25 '16 at 17:13
Bry'AWN
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
tautology- saying same thing over and over again by using synonyms.
Similarly, superfluity, pleonasm, verbosity also convey the same.
Usage-
He uses a lot of words to show off his huge vocabulary realizing little that his tautology is irritating to others.
Verbiage is a great word! And it has a negative feeling, if not connotation, so you can use it without seeming overly, excessively, redundantly judgmental.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
add a comment |
tautology- saying same thing over and over again by using synonyms.
Similarly, superfluity, pleonasm, verbosity also convey the same.
Usage-
He uses a lot of words to show off his huge vocabulary realizing little that his tautology is irritating to others.
Verbiage is a great word! And it has a negative feeling, if not connotation, so you can use it without seeming overly, excessively, redundantly judgmental.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
add a comment |
tautology- saying same thing over and over again by using synonyms.
Similarly, superfluity, pleonasm, verbosity also convey the same.
Usage-
He uses a lot of words to show off his huge vocabulary realizing little that his tautology is irritating to others.
tautology- saying same thing over and over again by using synonyms.
Similarly, superfluity, pleonasm, verbosity also convey the same.
Usage-
He uses a lot of words to show off his huge vocabulary realizing little that his tautology is irritating to others.
edited Jan 4 at 10:43
answered Apr 25 '16 at 16:05
Shilpam Dubey
1,0101812
1,0101812
Verbiage is a great word! And it has a negative feeling, if not connotation, so you can use it without seeming overly, excessively, redundantly judgmental.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
add a comment |
Verbiage is a great word! And it has a negative feeling, if not connotation, so you can use it without seeming overly, excessively, redundantly judgmental.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
Verbiage is a great word! And it has a negative feeling, if not connotation, so you can use it without seeming overly, excessively, redundantly judgmental.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
Verbiage is a great word! And it has a negative feeling, if not connotation, so you can use it without seeming overly, excessively, redundantly judgmental.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
add a comment |
lengthy descriptions. long-drawn-out descriptions. If there are too many words, I think the word lengthy works fine. For me, prolix and verbose and long-winded would not be used here as those words are about communications not descriptions per se.
Typically, in English a short description contrasts with a lengthy or long description.
add a comment |
lengthy descriptions. long-drawn-out descriptions. If there are too many words, I think the word lengthy works fine. For me, prolix and verbose and long-winded would not be used here as those words are about communications not descriptions per se.
Typically, in English a short description contrasts with a lengthy or long description.
add a comment |
lengthy descriptions. long-drawn-out descriptions. If there are too many words, I think the word lengthy works fine. For me, prolix and verbose and long-winded would not be used here as those words are about communications not descriptions per se.
Typically, in English a short description contrasts with a lengthy or long description.
lengthy descriptions. long-drawn-out descriptions. If there are too many words, I think the word lengthy works fine. For me, prolix and verbose and long-winded would not be used here as those words are about communications not descriptions per se.
Typically, in English a short description contrasts with a lengthy or long description.
answered Apr 25 '16 at 15:47
Lambie
7,2251931
7,2251931
add a comment |
add a comment |
Discursive. It's an antonym for concise.
1
And it sounds a bit like 'curse'.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
add a comment |
Discursive. It's an antonym for concise.
1
And it sounds a bit like 'curse'.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
add a comment |
Discursive. It's an antonym for concise.
Discursive. It's an antonym for concise.
answered Apr 26 '16 at 4:44
Mach
172
172
1
And it sounds a bit like 'curse'.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
add a comment |
1
And it sounds a bit like 'curse'.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
1
1
And it sounds a bit like 'curse'.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
And it sounds a bit like 'curse'.
– user126158
Apr 26 '16 at 22:53
add a comment |
On alieniloquent
(not to mention alieniloquently, alieniloquence, alieniloquacious, alieniloque, alieniloquize, alieniloquy, alieniloquial, alieniloquially, alieniloquist, alieniloquism, alieniloquacious, alieniloquaciously, et alios)
Per Oxford Dictionaries Online, an alieniloquy is
an instance of straying from the subject one is supposed to be talking about; rambling of evasive talk.
Aliens are “others”, of course, so this is talking about other things if you would. It derives from
post-classical Latin alieniloquium allegory from classical Latin aliēnus + ‑loquium, after Hellenistic Greek ἀλληγορία.
Since all nouns ending in -iloquy have corresponding derived adjectives ending in ‑iloquent, the world you’re looking for is therefore necessarily alieniloquent — pronounced /ˌeɪlɪəˈnɪləkwənt/.
If that’s not quite the right part of speech, a great number of derivative terms can be similarly derived in a perfectly regular fashion. Unless of course you prefer a term a tad less...grandiloquent? :-)
add a comment |
On alieniloquent
(not to mention alieniloquently, alieniloquence, alieniloquacious, alieniloque, alieniloquize, alieniloquy, alieniloquial, alieniloquially, alieniloquist, alieniloquism, alieniloquacious, alieniloquaciously, et alios)
Per Oxford Dictionaries Online, an alieniloquy is
an instance of straying from the subject one is supposed to be talking about; rambling of evasive talk.
Aliens are “others”, of course, so this is talking about other things if you would. It derives from
post-classical Latin alieniloquium allegory from classical Latin aliēnus + ‑loquium, after Hellenistic Greek ἀλληγορία.
Since all nouns ending in -iloquy have corresponding derived adjectives ending in ‑iloquent, the world you’re looking for is therefore necessarily alieniloquent — pronounced /ˌeɪlɪəˈnɪləkwənt/.
If that’s not quite the right part of speech, a great number of derivative terms can be similarly derived in a perfectly regular fashion. Unless of course you prefer a term a tad less...grandiloquent? :-)
add a comment |
On alieniloquent
(not to mention alieniloquently, alieniloquence, alieniloquacious, alieniloque, alieniloquize, alieniloquy, alieniloquial, alieniloquially, alieniloquist, alieniloquism, alieniloquacious, alieniloquaciously, et alios)
Per Oxford Dictionaries Online, an alieniloquy is
an instance of straying from the subject one is supposed to be talking about; rambling of evasive talk.
Aliens are “others”, of course, so this is talking about other things if you would. It derives from
post-classical Latin alieniloquium allegory from classical Latin aliēnus + ‑loquium, after Hellenistic Greek ἀλληγορία.
Since all nouns ending in -iloquy have corresponding derived adjectives ending in ‑iloquent, the world you’re looking for is therefore necessarily alieniloquent — pronounced /ˌeɪlɪəˈnɪləkwənt/.
If that’s not quite the right part of speech, a great number of derivative terms can be similarly derived in a perfectly regular fashion. Unless of course you prefer a term a tad less...grandiloquent? :-)
On alieniloquent
(not to mention alieniloquently, alieniloquence, alieniloquacious, alieniloque, alieniloquize, alieniloquy, alieniloquial, alieniloquially, alieniloquist, alieniloquism, alieniloquacious, alieniloquaciously, et alios)
Per Oxford Dictionaries Online, an alieniloquy is
an instance of straying from the subject one is supposed to be talking about; rambling of evasive talk.
Aliens are “others”, of course, so this is talking about other things if you would. It derives from
post-classical Latin alieniloquium allegory from classical Latin aliēnus + ‑loquium, after Hellenistic Greek ἀλληγορία.
Since all nouns ending in -iloquy have corresponding derived adjectives ending in ‑iloquent, the world you’re looking for is therefore necessarily alieniloquent — pronounced /ˌeɪlɪəˈnɪləkwənt/.
If that’s not quite the right part of speech, a great number of derivative terms can be similarly derived in a perfectly regular fashion. Unless of course you prefer a term a tad less...grandiloquent? :-)
edited Jul 15 '17 at 22:19
answered Jul 15 '17 at 22:06
tchrist♦
108k28290464
108k28290464
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by Matt E. Эллен♦ Apr 26 '16 at 15:17
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
3
Technically, the documents have "low information density".
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 18:41
2
(Or, if you want to get even more technical, "high entropy".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 25 '16 at 19:13
2
When describing someone who elaborates beyond necessity, I've heard it said: "Ask him for the time and he'll tell you how to build a clock". (-:
– Jim Mack
Apr 25 '16 at 20:41
@HotLicks: High entropy would actually indicate a high amount of information, not a low information density.
– user2357112
Apr 26 '16 at 17:26
1
StenevL, The word you're looking for is "long". As in "the cv is too long" or the "description is too long". Nothing else is needed here. Indeed anything else would be too long.
– Fattie
Apr 26 '16 at 19:33