Query Firestore by UserID and date range?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I need to query Firestore, but it keeps telling me I need an index. Problem is that isn't realistic, since EVERY user would require a custom index based on their UserId. For security, I can't allow anyone access unless canAccess.${userID} == true as in the example below. But if I were to take ALL items, and filter them by date client-side I would be fetching hundreds of thousands of items every time I change the date range, so it isn't practical.



this.db.collection('items')
.where(`canAccess.${userId}`, '==', true)
.where('date', '>=', startDate)
.where('date', '<=', endDate);


How would one going about fetching only the items they are allowed to access, and only between the chosen date range?










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I need to query Firestore, but it keeps telling me I need an index. Problem is that isn't realistic, since EVERY user would require a custom index based on their UserId. For security, I can't allow anyone access unless canAccess.${userID} == true as in the example below. But if I were to take ALL items, and filter them by date client-side I would be fetching hundreds of thousands of items every time I change the date range, so it isn't practical.



    this.db.collection('items')
    .where(`canAccess.${userId}`, '==', true)
    .where('date', '>=', startDate)
    .where('date', '<=', endDate);


    How would one going about fetching only the items they are allowed to access, and only between the chosen date range?










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I need to query Firestore, but it keeps telling me I need an index. Problem is that isn't realistic, since EVERY user would require a custom index based on their UserId. For security, I can't allow anyone access unless canAccess.${userID} == true as in the example below. But if I were to take ALL items, and filter them by date client-side I would be fetching hundreds of thousands of items every time I change the date range, so it isn't practical.



      this.db.collection('items')
      .where(`canAccess.${userId}`, '==', true)
      .where('date', '>=', startDate)
      .where('date', '<=', endDate);


      How would one going about fetching only the items they are allowed to access, and only between the chosen date range?










      share|improve this question















      I need to query Firestore, but it keeps telling me I need an index. Problem is that isn't realistic, since EVERY user would require a custom index based on their UserId. For security, I can't allow anyone access unless canAccess.${userID} == true as in the example below. But if I were to take ALL items, and filter them by date client-side I would be fetching hundreds of thousands of items every time I change the date range, so it isn't practical.



      this.db.collection('items')
      .where(`canAccess.${userId}`, '==', true)
      .where('date', '>=', startDate)
      .where('date', '<=', endDate);


      How would one going about fetching only the items they are allowed to access, and only between the chosen date range?







      javascript google-cloud-firestore






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 18 at 21:40









      Frank van Puffelen

      221k25362387




      221k25362387










      asked Nov 18 at 19:45









      Jus10

      1,46521038




      1,46521038
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You'll have to restructure your documents in order to perform this query. Consider putting the uids that can access the document in a field with a List type called canAccess. Then query the list with array-contains after you create an index on that field.



          this.db.collection('items')
          .where('canAccess', 'array-contains', userId)
          .where('date', '>=', startDate)
          .where('date', '<=', endDate);





          share|improve this answer





















          • Oh I assumed querying an array would be just like querying an object in this situation (Would still need an index for array contents or something). Thanks! I'll give this a shot!
            – Jus10
            Nov 18 at 21:05











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53364788%2fquery-firestore-by-userid-and-date-range%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You'll have to restructure your documents in order to perform this query. Consider putting the uids that can access the document in a field with a List type called canAccess. Then query the list with array-contains after you create an index on that field.



          this.db.collection('items')
          .where('canAccess', 'array-contains', userId)
          .where('date', '>=', startDate)
          .where('date', '<=', endDate);





          share|improve this answer





















          • Oh I assumed querying an array would be just like querying an object in this situation (Would still need an index for array contents or something). Thanks! I'll give this a shot!
            – Jus10
            Nov 18 at 21:05















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You'll have to restructure your documents in order to perform this query. Consider putting the uids that can access the document in a field with a List type called canAccess. Then query the list with array-contains after you create an index on that field.



          this.db.collection('items')
          .where('canAccess', 'array-contains', userId)
          .where('date', '>=', startDate)
          .where('date', '<=', endDate);





          share|improve this answer





















          • Oh I assumed querying an array would be just like querying an object in this situation (Would still need an index for array contents or something). Thanks! I'll give this a shot!
            – Jus10
            Nov 18 at 21:05













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          You'll have to restructure your documents in order to perform this query. Consider putting the uids that can access the document in a field with a List type called canAccess. Then query the list with array-contains after you create an index on that field.



          this.db.collection('items')
          .where('canAccess', 'array-contains', userId)
          .where('date', '>=', startDate)
          .where('date', '<=', endDate);





          share|improve this answer












          You'll have to restructure your documents in order to perform this query. Consider putting the uids that can access the document in a field with a List type called canAccess. Then query the list with array-contains after you create an index on that field.



          this.db.collection('items')
          .where('canAccess', 'array-contains', userId)
          .where('date', '>=', startDate)
          .where('date', '<=', endDate);






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 18 at 20:28









          Doug Stevenson

          65.7k77997




          65.7k77997












          • Oh I assumed querying an array would be just like querying an object in this situation (Would still need an index for array contents or something). Thanks! I'll give this a shot!
            – Jus10
            Nov 18 at 21:05


















          • Oh I assumed querying an array would be just like querying an object in this situation (Would still need an index for array contents or something). Thanks! I'll give this a shot!
            – Jus10
            Nov 18 at 21:05
















          Oh I assumed querying an array would be just like querying an object in this situation (Would still need an index for array contents or something). Thanks! I'll give this a shot!
          – Jus10
          Nov 18 at 21:05




          Oh I assumed querying an array would be just like querying an object in this situation (Would still need an index for array contents or something). Thanks! I'll give this a shot!
          – Jus10
          Nov 18 at 21:05


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53364788%2fquery-firestore-by-userid-and-date-range%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

          Alcedinidae

          RAC Tourist Trophy