A state with no more possible moves












4















We ran into a state in a game of Checkers, where there were no more possible moves. Is this situation even possible according to the correct rules (I'm not an experienced player)? And if so, is it a draw? And if not, who wins (I'd assume white, because he jumped a piece)?



If the situation is possible, is it common? What about professional setting?












share|improve this question







New contributor




Sorashi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    4















    We ran into a state in a game of Checkers, where there were no more possible moves. Is this situation even possible according to the correct rules (I'm not an experienced player)? And if so, is it a draw? And if not, who wins (I'd assume white, because he jumped a piece)?



    If the situation is possible, is it common? What about professional setting?












    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Sorashi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      4












      4








      4








      We ran into a state in a game of Checkers, where there were no more possible moves. Is this situation even possible according to the correct rules (I'm not an experienced player)? And if so, is it a draw? And if not, who wins (I'd assume white, because he jumped a piece)?



      If the situation is possible, is it common? What about professional setting?












      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Sorashi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      We ran into a state in a game of Checkers, where there were no more possible moves. Is this situation even possible according to the correct rules (I'm not an experienced player)? And if so, is it a draw? And if not, who wins (I'd assume white, because he jumped a piece)?



      If the situation is possible, is it common? What about professional setting?









      checkers






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Sorashi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Sorashi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Sorashi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      SorashiSorashi

      1233




      1233




      New contributor




      Sorashi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Sorashi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Sorashi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          According to this set of the rules:




          A player wins the game when the opponent cannot make a move. In most cases, this is because all of the opponent's pieces have been captured, but it could also be because all of his pieces are blocked in.




          So you win if your opponent can't move.



          I have had this situation several times with draughts which is similar to checkers.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.

            – CodeMonkey
            2 days ago








          • 1





            @CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.

            – Toon Krijthe
            2 days ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "147"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Sorashi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44845%2fa-state-with-no-more-possible-moves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          According to this set of the rules:




          A player wins the game when the opponent cannot make a move. In most cases, this is because all of the opponent's pieces have been captured, but it could also be because all of his pieces are blocked in.




          So you win if your opponent can't move.



          I have had this situation several times with draughts which is similar to checkers.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.

            – CodeMonkey
            2 days ago








          • 1





            @CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.

            – Toon Krijthe
            2 days ago
















          5














          According to this set of the rules:




          A player wins the game when the opponent cannot make a move. In most cases, this is because all of the opponent's pieces have been captured, but it could also be because all of his pieces are blocked in.




          So you win if your opponent can't move.



          I have had this situation several times with draughts which is similar to checkers.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.

            – CodeMonkey
            2 days ago








          • 1





            @CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.

            – Toon Krijthe
            2 days ago














          5












          5








          5







          According to this set of the rules:




          A player wins the game when the opponent cannot make a move. In most cases, this is because all of the opponent's pieces have been captured, but it could also be because all of his pieces are blocked in.




          So you win if your opponent can't move.



          I have had this situation several times with draughts which is similar to checkers.






          share|improve this answer















          According to this set of the rules:




          A player wins the game when the opponent cannot make a move. In most cases, this is because all of the opponent's pieces have been captured, but it could also be because all of his pieces are blocked in.




          So you win if your opponent can't move.



          I have had this situation several times with draughts which is similar to checkers.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago

























          answered 2 days ago









          Toon KrijtheToon Krijthe

          6,62843548




          6,62843548








          • 2





            There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.

            – CodeMonkey
            2 days ago








          • 1





            @CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.

            – Toon Krijthe
            2 days ago














          • 2





            There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.

            – CodeMonkey
            2 days ago








          • 1





            @CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.

            – Toon Krijthe
            2 days ago








          2




          2





          There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.

          – CodeMonkey
          2 days ago







          There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.

          – CodeMonkey
          2 days ago






          1




          1





          @CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.

          – Toon Krijthe
          2 days ago





          @CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.

          – Toon Krijthe
          2 days ago










          Sorashi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Sorashi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Sorashi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Sorashi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Board & Card Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44845%2fa-state-with-no-more-possible-moves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

          Alcedinidae

          Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]