Making a Chrome extension for a site that uses React. How to persist changes after re-rendering?
I want my extension to add elements to a page. But the site uses React
which means every time there's a change the page is re-rendered but without the elements that I added.
I'm only passingly familiar with React from some tutorial apps I built a long time ago.
javascript reactjs google-chrome-extension
add a comment |
I want my extension to add elements to a page. But the site uses React
which means every time there's a change the page is re-rendered but without the elements that I added.
I'm only passingly familiar with React from some tutorial apps I built a long time ago.
javascript reactjs google-chrome-extension
1
You can probably use MutationObserver to detect the changes in DOM and re-add your stuff.
– wOxxOm
Nov 21 '18 at 5:15
@wOxxOm Hey, that worked post it as an answer and I'll accept it.
– MCB
Nov 22 '18 at 18:50
I think it'd be more useful if you post an answer with the working code.
– wOxxOm
Nov 22 '18 at 18:56
add a comment |
I want my extension to add elements to a page. But the site uses React
which means every time there's a change the page is re-rendered but without the elements that I added.
I'm only passingly familiar with React from some tutorial apps I built a long time ago.
javascript reactjs google-chrome-extension
I want my extension to add elements to a page. But the site uses React
which means every time there's a change the page is re-rendered but without the elements that I added.
I'm only passingly familiar with React from some tutorial apps I built a long time ago.
javascript reactjs google-chrome-extension
javascript reactjs google-chrome-extension
edited Nov 23 '18 at 11:01
Xan
53.6k10104131
53.6k10104131
asked Nov 20 '18 at 23:28
MCBMCB
1,41411328
1,41411328
1
You can probably use MutationObserver to detect the changes in DOM and re-add your stuff.
– wOxxOm
Nov 21 '18 at 5:15
@wOxxOm Hey, that worked post it as an answer and I'll accept it.
– MCB
Nov 22 '18 at 18:50
I think it'd be more useful if you post an answer with the working code.
– wOxxOm
Nov 22 '18 at 18:56
add a comment |
1
You can probably use MutationObserver to detect the changes in DOM and re-add your stuff.
– wOxxOm
Nov 21 '18 at 5:15
@wOxxOm Hey, that worked post it as an answer and I'll accept it.
– MCB
Nov 22 '18 at 18:50
I think it'd be more useful if you post an answer with the working code.
– wOxxOm
Nov 22 '18 at 18:56
1
1
You can probably use MutationObserver to detect the changes in DOM and re-add your stuff.
– wOxxOm
Nov 21 '18 at 5:15
You can probably use MutationObserver to detect the changes in DOM and re-add your stuff.
– wOxxOm
Nov 21 '18 at 5:15
@wOxxOm Hey, that worked post it as an answer and I'll accept it.
– MCB
Nov 22 '18 at 18:50
@wOxxOm Hey, that worked post it as an answer and I'll accept it.
– MCB
Nov 22 '18 at 18:50
I think it'd be more useful if you post an answer with the working code.
– wOxxOm
Nov 22 '18 at 18:56
I think it'd be more useful if you post an answer with the working code.
– wOxxOm
Nov 22 '18 at 18:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I implemented @wOxxOm's comment to use MutationObserver
and it worked very well.
static placeAndObserveMutations (insertionBoxSelector) {
let placer = new Placement ();
placer.place(insertionBoxSelector);
placer.observeMutations(insertionBoxSelector);
}
place (insertionBoxSelector) {
let box = $(insertionBoxSelector)
this.insertionBox = box; //insertionBox is the element that the content
// will be appended to
this.addedBox = EnterBox.addInfo(box); //addedBox is the content
// Worth noting that at this point it's fairly empty. It'll get filled by
// async ajax calls while this is running. And all that will still be there
// when it's added back in the callback later.
}
observeMutations(insertionBoxSelector) {
let observer = new MutationObserver (this.replaceBox.bind(this));
// this.insertionBox is a jQuery object and I assume `observe` doesn't accept that
let insertionBox = document.querySelector(insertionBoxSelector);
observer.observe(title, {attributes: true});
}
replaceBox () {
this.insertionBox.append(this.addedBox);
_position (this.addedBox);
}
That being said someone suggested adding the content above the React
node (i.e. the body
) and just positioning the added content absolutely relative to the window. And as this will actually solve a separate problem I was having on some pages of a site I'll probably do that. Also, it's far simpler.
But I thought this was still an interesting solution to a rare problem so I wanted to post it as well.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53403160%2fmaking-a-chrome-extension-for-a-site-that-uses-react-how-to-persist-changes-aft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I implemented @wOxxOm's comment to use MutationObserver
and it worked very well.
static placeAndObserveMutations (insertionBoxSelector) {
let placer = new Placement ();
placer.place(insertionBoxSelector);
placer.observeMutations(insertionBoxSelector);
}
place (insertionBoxSelector) {
let box = $(insertionBoxSelector)
this.insertionBox = box; //insertionBox is the element that the content
// will be appended to
this.addedBox = EnterBox.addInfo(box); //addedBox is the content
// Worth noting that at this point it's fairly empty. It'll get filled by
// async ajax calls while this is running. And all that will still be there
// when it's added back in the callback later.
}
observeMutations(insertionBoxSelector) {
let observer = new MutationObserver (this.replaceBox.bind(this));
// this.insertionBox is a jQuery object and I assume `observe` doesn't accept that
let insertionBox = document.querySelector(insertionBoxSelector);
observer.observe(title, {attributes: true});
}
replaceBox () {
this.insertionBox.append(this.addedBox);
_position (this.addedBox);
}
That being said someone suggested adding the content above the React
node (i.e. the body
) and just positioning the added content absolutely relative to the window. And as this will actually solve a separate problem I was having on some pages of a site I'll probably do that. Also, it's far simpler.
But I thought this was still an interesting solution to a rare problem so I wanted to post it as well.
add a comment |
I implemented @wOxxOm's comment to use MutationObserver
and it worked very well.
static placeAndObserveMutations (insertionBoxSelector) {
let placer = new Placement ();
placer.place(insertionBoxSelector);
placer.observeMutations(insertionBoxSelector);
}
place (insertionBoxSelector) {
let box = $(insertionBoxSelector)
this.insertionBox = box; //insertionBox is the element that the content
// will be appended to
this.addedBox = EnterBox.addInfo(box); //addedBox is the content
// Worth noting that at this point it's fairly empty. It'll get filled by
// async ajax calls while this is running. And all that will still be there
// when it's added back in the callback later.
}
observeMutations(insertionBoxSelector) {
let observer = new MutationObserver (this.replaceBox.bind(this));
// this.insertionBox is a jQuery object and I assume `observe` doesn't accept that
let insertionBox = document.querySelector(insertionBoxSelector);
observer.observe(title, {attributes: true});
}
replaceBox () {
this.insertionBox.append(this.addedBox);
_position (this.addedBox);
}
That being said someone suggested adding the content above the React
node (i.e. the body
) and just positioning the added content absolutely relative to the window. And as this will actually solve a separate problem I was having on some pages of a site I'll probably do that. Also, it's far simpler.
But I thought this was still an interesting solution to a rare problem so I wanted to post it as well.
add a comment |
I implemented @wOxxOm's comment to use MutationObserver
and it worked very well.
static placeAndObserveMutations (insertionBoxSelector) {
let placer = new Placement ();
placer.place(insertionBoxSelector);
placer.observeMutations(insertionBoxSelector);
}
place (insertionBoxSelector) {
let box = $(insertionBoxSelector)
this.insertionBox = box; //insertionBox is the element that the content
// will be appended to
this.addedBox = EnterBox.addInfo(box); //addedBox is the content
// Worth noting that at this point it's fairly empty. It'll get filled by
// async ajax calls while this is running. And all that will still be there
// when it's added back in the callback later.
}
observeMutations(insertionBoxSelector) {
let observer = new MutationObserver (this.replaceBox.bind(this));
// this.insertionBox is a jQuery object and I assume `observe` doesn't accept that
let insertionBox = document.querySelector(insertionBoxSelector);
observer.observe(title, {attributes: true});
}
replaceBox () {
this.insertionBox.append(this.addedBox);
_position (this.addedBox);
}
That being said someone suggested adding the content above the React
node (i.e. the body
) and just positioning the added content absolutely relative to the window. And as this will actually solve a separate problem I was having on some pages of a site I'll probably do that. Also, it's far simpler.
But I thought this was still an interesting solution to a rare problem so I wanted to post it as well.
I implemented @wOxxOm's comment to use MutationObserver
and it worked very well.
static placeAndObserveMutations (insertionBoxSelector) {
let placer = new Placement ();
placer.place(insertionBoxSelector);
placer.observeMutations(insertionBoxSelector);
}
place (insertionBoxSelector) {
let box = $(insertionBoxSelector)
this.insertionBox = box; //insertionBox is the element that the content
// will be appended to
this.addedBox = EnterBox.addInfo(box); //addedBox is the content
// Worth noting that at this point it's fairly empty. It'll get filled by
// async ajax calls while this is running. And all that will still be there
// when it's added back in the callback later.
}
observeMutations(insertionBoxSelector) {
let observer = new MutationObserver (this.replaceBox.bind(this));
// this.insertionBox is a jQuery object and I assume `observe` doesn't accept that
let insertionBox = document.querySelector(insertionBoxSelector);
observer.observe(title, {attributes: true});
}
replaceBox () {
this.insertionBox.append(this.addedBox);
_position (this.addedBox);
}
That being said someone suggested adding the content above the React
node (i.e. the body
) and just positioning the added content absolutely relative to the window. And as this will actually solve a separate problem I was having on some pages of a site I'll probably do that. Also, it's far simpler.
But I thought this was still an interesting solution to a rare problem so I wanted to post it as well.
answered Nov 22 '18 at 20:10
MCBMCB
1,41411328
1,41411328
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53403160%2fmaking-a-chrome-extension-for-a-site-that-uses-react-how-to-persist-changes-aft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
You can probably use MutationObserver to detect the changes in DOM and re-add your stuff.
– wOxxOm
Nov 21 '18 at 5:15
@wOxxOm Hey, that worked post it as an answer and I'll accept it.
– MCB
Nov 22 '18 at 18:50
I think it'd be more useful if you post an answer with the working code.
– wOxxOm
Nov 22 '18 at 18:56