States between Transparent, Translucent and Opaque












0














I started creating a color palette for a side project and I was thinking what words would fit the best to describe alpha (transparency) of color.



Imagine we have 0 for totally clear (every light passes through) and 7 for absolutely opaque (nothing passes through). 4 can be translucent, 6 could be hazy or foggy.



How would you name states between Transparent > Translucent > Opaque?



Not a native English speaker.










share|improve this question









New contributor




svkaka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
    – Centaurus
    Jan 5 at 1:15






  • 2




    If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 1:36










  • Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
    – michael.hor257k
    Jan 5 at 6:14


















0














I started creating a color palette for a side project and I was thinking what words would fit the best to describe alpha (transparency) of color.



Imagine we have 0 for totally clear (every light passes through) and 7 for absolutely opaque (nothing passes through). 4 can be translucent, 6 could be hazy or foggy.



How would you name states between Transparent > Translucent > Opaque?



Not a native English speaker.










share|improve this question









New contributor




svkaka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
    – Centaurus
    Jan 5 at 1:15






  • 2




    If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 1:36










  • Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
    – michael.hor257k
    Jan 5 at 6:14
















0












0








0







I started creating a color palette for a side project and I was thinking what words would fit the best to describe alpha (transparency) of color.



Imagine we have 0 for totally clear (every light passes through) and 7 for absolutely opaque (nothing passes through). 4 can be translucent, 6 could be hazy or foggy.



How would you name states between Transparent > Translucent > Opaque?



Not a native English speaker.










share|improve this question









New contributor




svkaka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I started creating a color palette for a side project and I was thinking what words would fit the best to describe alpha (transparency) of color.



Imagine we have 0 for totally clear (every light passes through) and 7 for absolutely opaque (nothing passes through). 4 can be translucent, 6 could be hazy or foggy.



How would you name states between Transparent > Translucent > Opaque?



Not a native English speaker.







single-word-requests colors






share|improve this question









New contributor




svkaka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




svkaka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 5 at 2:53









Laurel

31.3k660111




31.3k660111






New contributor




svkaka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Jan 5 at 0:41









svkakasvkaka

1011




1011




New contributor




svkaka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





svkaka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






svkaka is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
    – Centaurus
    Jan 5 at 1:15






  • 2




    If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 1:36










  • Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
    – michael.hor257k
    Jan 5 at 6:14
















  • 1




    What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
    – Centaurus
    Jan 5 at 1:15






  • 2




    If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 5 at 1:36










  • Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
    – michael.hor257k
    Jan 5 at 6:14










1




1




What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
– Centaurus
Jan 5 at 1:15




What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
– Centaurus
Jan 5 at 1:15




2




2




If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 1:36




If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 1:36












Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:14






Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:14












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Translucency and opacity are usually considered antonyms of practically opposing values. Here is a description as applied to HTML. http://www.dev-hq.net/html-css/20--opacity-transparency



Both are usually given in percent thus fully transparent is 100% translucent or 0% opacity
Conversely fully opaque is 100% opacity and 0% translucency.



The scale is sometimes reduced to points such that equal opacity and translucency would be a value of 0.5 each.



I have not seen a scale of 7 points, however I think there was one ranking a number of words, for example inks are graded as :-




Transparent

Semi-transparent

Semi-opaque

and Opaque




for a better description of the relativity of these terms see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency






share|improve this answer























  • You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
    – michael.hor257k
    Jan 5 at 6:17












  • @michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
    – KJO
    2 days ago












  • Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
    – michael.hor257k
    2 days ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






svkaka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479945%2fstates-between-transparent-translucent-and-opaque%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Translucency and opacity are usually considered antonyms of practically opposing values. Here is a description as applied to HTML. http://www.dev-hq.net/html-css/20--opacity-transparency



Both are usually given in percent thus fully transparent is 100% translucent or 0% opacity
Conversely fully opaque is 100% opacity and 0% translucency.



The scale is sometimes reduced to points such that equal opacity and translucency would be a value of 0.5 each.



I have not seen a scale of 7 points, however I think there was one ranking a number of words, for example inks are graded as :-




Transparent

Semi-transparent

Semi-opaque

and Opaque




for a better description of the relativity of these terms see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency






share|improve this answer























  • You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
    – michael.hor257k
    Jan 5 at 6:17












  • @michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
    – KJO
    2 days ago












  • Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
    – michael.hor257k
    2 days ago


















0














Translucency and opacity are usually considered antonyms of practically opposing values. Here is a description as applied to HTML. http://www.dev-hq.net/html-css/20--opacity-transparency



Both are usually given in percent thus fully transparent is 100% translucent or 0% opacity
Conversely fully opaque is 100% opacity and 0% translucency.



The scale is sometimes reduced to points such that equal opacity and translucency would be a value of 0.5 each.



I have not seen a scale of 7 points, however I think there was one ranking a number of words, for example inks are graded as :-




Transparent

Semi-transparent

Semi-opaque

and Opaque




for a better description of the relativity of these terms see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency






share|improve this answer























  • You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
    – michael.hor257k
    Jan 5 at 6:17












  • @michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
    – KJO
    2 days ago












  • Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
    – michael.hor257k
    2 days ago
















0












0








0






Translucency and opacity are usually considered antonyms of practically opposing values. Here is a description as applied to HTML. http://www.dev-hq.net/html-css/20--opacity-transparency



Both are usually given in percent thus fully transparent is 100% translucent or 0% opacity
Conversely fully opaque is 100% opacity and 0% translucency.



The scale is sometimes reduced to points such that equal opacity and translucency would be a value of 0.5 each.



I have not seen a scale of 7 points, however I think there was one ranking a number of words, for example inks are graded as :-




Transparent

Semi-transparent

Semi-opaque

and Opaque




for a better description of the relativity of these terms see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency






share|improve this answer














Translucency and opacity are usually considered antonyms of practically opposing values. Here is a description as applied to HTML. http://www.dev-hq.net/html-css/20--opacity-transparency



Both are usually given in percent thus fully transparent is 100% translucent or 0% opacity
Conversely fully opaque is 100% opacity and 0% translucency.



The scale is sometimes reduced to points such that equal opacity and translucency would be a value of 0.5 each.



I have not seen a scale of 7 points, however I think there was one ranking a number of words, for example inks are graded as :-




Transparent

Semi-transparent

Semi-opaque

and Opaque




for a better description of the relativity of these terms see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 5 at 3:14

























answered Jan 5 at 2:24









KJOKJO

2,880419




2,880419












  • You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
    – michael.hor257k
    Jan 5 at 6:17












  • @michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
    – KJO
    2 days ago












  • Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
    – michael.hor257k
    2 days ago




















  • You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
    – michael.hor257k
    Jan 5 at 6:17












  • @michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
    – KJO
    2 days ago












  • Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
    – michael.hor257k
    2 days ago


















You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:17






You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:17














@michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
– KJO
2 days ago






@michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
– KJO
2 days ago














Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
– michael.hor257k
2 days ago






Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
– michael.hor257k
2 days ago












svkaka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















svkaka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













svkaka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












svkaka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479945%2fstates-between-transparent-translucent-and-opaque%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]