States between Transparent, Translucent and Opaque
I started creating a color palette for a side project and I was thinking what words would fit the best to describe alpha (transparency) of color.
Imagine we have 0 for totally clear (every light passes through) and 7 for absolutely opaque (nothing passes through). 4 can be translucent, 6 could be hazy or foggy.
How would you name states between Transparent > Translucent > Opaque?
Not a native English speaker.
single-word-requests colors
New contributor
add a comment |
I started creating a color palette for a side project and I was thinking what words would fit the best to describe alpha (transparency) of color.
Imagine we have 0 for totally clear (every light passes through) and 7 for absolutely opaque (nothing passes through). 4 can be translucent, 6 could be hazy or foggy.
How would you name states between Transparent > Translucent > Opaque?
Not a native English speaker.
single-word-requests colors
New contributor
1
What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
– Centaurus
Jan 5 at 1:15
2
If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 1:36
Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:14
add a comment |
I started creating a color palette for a side project and I was thinking what words would fit the best to describe alpha (transparency) of color.
Imagine we have 0 for totally clear (every light passes through) and 7 for absolutely opaque (nothing passes through). 4 can be translucent, 6 could be hazy or foggy.
How would you name states between Transparent > Translucent > Opaque?
Not a native English speaker.
single-word-requests colors
New contributor
I started creating a color palette for a side project and I was thinking what words would fit the best to describe alpha (transparency) of color.
Imagine we have 0 for totally clear (every light passes through) and 7 for absolutely opaque (nothing passes through). 4 can be translucent, 6 could be hazy or foggy.
How would you name states between Transparent > Translucent > Opaque?
Not a native English speaker.
single-word-requests colors
single-word-requests colors
New contributor
New contributor
edited Jan 5 at 2:53
Laurel
31.3k660111
31.3k660111
New contributor
asked Jan 5 at 0:41
svkakasvkaka
1011
1011
New contributor
New contributor
1
What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
– Centaurus
Jan 5 at 1:15
2
If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 1:36
Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:14
add a comment |
1
What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
– Centaurus
Jan 5 at 1:15
2
If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 1:36
Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:14
1
1
What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
– Centaurus
Jan 5 at 1:15
What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
– Centaurus
Jan 5 at 1:15
2
2
If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 1:36
If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 1:36
Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:14
Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:14
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Translucency and opacity are usually considered antonyms of practically opposing values. Here is a description as applied to HTML. http://www.dev-hq.net/html-css/20--opacity-transparency
Both are usually given in percent thus fully transparent is 100% translucent or 0% opacity
Conversely fully opaque is 100% opacity and 0% translucency.
The scale is sometimes reduced to points such that equal opacity and translucency would be a value of 0.5 each.
I have not seen a scale of 7 points, however I think there was one ranking a number of words, for example inks are graded as :-
Transparent
Semi-transparent
Semi-opaque
and Opaque
for a better description of the relativity of these terms see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:17
@michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
– KJO
2 days ago
Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
– michael.hor257k
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
svkaka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479945%2fstates-between-transparent-translucent-and-opaque%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Translucency and opacity are usually considered antonyms of practically opposing values. Here is a description as applied to HTML. http://www.dev-hq.net/html-css/20--opacity-transparency
Both are usually given in percent thus fully transparent is 100% translucent or 0% opacity
Conversely fully opaque is 100% opacity and 0% translucency.
The scale is sometimes reduced to points such that equal opacity and translucency would be a value of 0.5 each.
I have not seen a scale of 7 points, however I think there was one ranking a number of words, for example inks are graded as :-
Transparent
Semi-transparent
Semi-opaque
and Opaque
for a better description of the relativity of these terms see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:17
@michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
– KJO
2 days ago
Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
– michael.hor257k
2 days ago
add a comment |
Translucency and opacity are usually considered antonyms of practically opposing values. Here is a description as applied to HTML. http://www.dev-hq.net/html-css/20--opacity-transparency
Both are usually given in percent thus fully transparent is 100% translucent or 0% opacity
Conversely fully opaque is 100% opacity and 0% translucency.
The scale is sometimes reduced to points such that equal opacity and translucency would be a value of 0.5 each.
I have not seen a scale of 7 points, however I think there was one ranking a number of words, for example inks are graded as :-
Transparent
Semi-transparent
Semi-opaque
and Opaque
for a better description of the relativity of these terms see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:17
@michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
– KJO
2 days ago
Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
– michael.hor257k
2 days ago
add a comment |
Translucency and opacity are usually considered antonyms of practically opposing values. Here is a description as applied to HTML. http://www.dev-hq.net/html-css/20--opacity-transparency
Both are usually given in percent thus fully transparent is 100% translucent or 0% opacity
Conversely fully opaque is 100% opacity and 0% translucency.
The scale is sometimes reduced to points such that equal opacity and translucency would be a value of 0.5 each.
I have not seen a scale of 7 points, however I think there was one ranking a number of words, for example inks are graded as :-
Transparent
Semi-transparent
Semi-opaque
and Opaque
for a better description of the relativity of these terms see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
Translucency and opacity are usually considered antonyms of practically opposing values. Here is a description as applied to HTML. http://www.dev-hq.net/html-css/20--opacity-transparency
Both are usually given in percent thus fully transparent is 100% translucent or 0% opacity
Conversely fully opaque is 100% opacity and 0% translucency.
The scale is sometimes reduced to points such that equal opacity and translucency would be a value of 0.5 each.
I have not seen a scale of 7 points, however I think there was one ranking a number of words, for example inks are graded as :-
Transparent
Semi-transparent
Semi-opaque
and Opaque
for a better description of the relativity of these terms see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
edited Jan 5 at 3:14
answered Jan 5 at 2:24
KJOKJO
2,880419
2,880419
You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:17
@michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
– KJO
2 days ago
Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
– michael.hor257k
2 days ago
add a comment |
You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:17
@michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
– KJO
2 days ago
Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
– michael.hor257k
2 days ago
You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:17
You are mixing transparency and translucency; the two are not interchangeable: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:17
@michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
– KJO
2 days ago
@michael.hor257k Agreed I had already linked to the article where it shows "Translucency (also called translucence or translucidity) is a superset of transparency" thus not the same, but as its not a discussion on the science I had left my common mixing of the two. Feel free to edit my answer to clarify your take on which words are misleading.
– KJO
2 days ago
Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
– michael.hor257k
2 days ago
Given the context of the question, I think it would be best to stick to the "scientific" terms (which are known to most people who deal with color in media (e.g. art directors and graphic designers). See also my comment to question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/479945/…
– michael.hor257k
2 days ago
add a comment |
svkaka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
svkaka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
svkaka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
svkaka is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479945%2fstates-between-transparent-translucent-and-opaque%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
What about "semi-translucent" and "semi-opaque" ?
– Centaurus
Jan 5 at 1:15
2
If a modestly technical classification is needed it's generally the case to assign some numerical value to the "degree" of transparency.
– Hot Licks
Jan 5 at 1:36
Technically, translucent is not halfway between transparent and opaque. Both translucent and transparent pass light; opaque does not. A 50% translucent object would pass the same amount of light as a 50% transparent one. Only in ordinary speech is translucent considered a synonym of semi-transparent.
– michael.hor257k
Jan 5 at 6:14