What is it called to attack a person then say something uplifting?












1












$begingroup$


Say a manager emailing the people under her in a way that to them feels degrading, and putting down. But at the end of the email its encouraging/uplifting type saying I know you are intelligent and capable people.



So is there a name of this type of behavior to attack/degrade then at the end say something nice?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Edward Byrds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you everyone for you help. Gave me quite a bit to lookup. Appreciate it.
    $endgroup$
    – Edward Byrds
    Mar 22 at 13:52
















1












$begingroup$


Say a manager emailing the people under her in a way that to them feels degrading, and putting down. But at the end of the email its encouraging/uplifting type saying I know you are intelligent and capable people.



So is there a name of this type of behavior to attack/degrade then at the end say something nice?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Edward Byrds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you everyone for you help. Gave me quite a bit to lookup. Appreciate it.
    $endgroup$
    – Edward Byrds
    Mar 22 at 13:52














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Say a manager emailing the people under her in a way that to them feels degrading, and putting down. But at the end of the email its encouraging/uplifting type saying I know you are intelligent and capable people.



So is there a name of this type of behavior to attack/degrade then at the end say something nice?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Edward Byrds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Say a manager emailing the people under her in a way that to them feels degrading, and putting down. But at the end of the email its encouraging/uplifting type saying I know you are intelligent and capable people.



So is there a name of this type of behavior to attack/degrade then at the end say something nice?







social-psychology terminology behavior






share|improve this question









New contributor




Edward Byrds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Edward Byrds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 20 at 13:36









Ooker

782222




782222






New contributor




Edward Byrds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 20 at 11:19









Edward ByrdsEdward Byrds

83




83




New contributor




Edward Byrds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Edward Byrds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Edward Byrds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you everyone for you help. Gave me quite a bit to lookup. Appreciate it.
    $endgroup$
    – Edward Byrds
    Mar 22 at 13:52


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you everyone for you help. Gave me quite a bit to lookup. Appreciate it.
    $endgroup$
    – Edward Byrds
    Mar 22 at 13:52
















$begingroup$
Thank you everyone for you help. Gave me quite a bit to lookup. Appreciate it.
$endgroup$
– Edward Byrds
Mar 22 at 13:52




$begingroup$
Thank you everyone for you help. Gave me quite a bit to lookup. Appreciate it.
$endgroup$
– Edward Byrds
Mar 22 at 13:52










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

It sounds like a variant on the sandwich technique, which is advocated by some as the preferred way to deliver critical feedback to a person, like a student or employee. The sandwich technique can be defined as:




...offer[ing] a piece of negative feedback “sandwiched" between two positive
ones, thus easing the blow of the critique.




Note that this technique is criticized, because people might not remember the crucial middle critical part of the message, because of the recency effect: our brains are hardwired to remember the first and last bits of a conversation whilst glossing over the middle part (source: WeQ).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    The closest thing I can think of to what you are talking about is loosely referred to as 'Push-Pull'. It happens in a lot of unhealthy relationships and is a favorite tactic of so-called pickup artists. Used appropriately it can be healthy, but it is typically a manipulation tactic. https://outofthefog.website/top-100-trait-blog/2015/11/4/push-pull






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      This reminds me of the cycle of abuse
      $endgroup$
      – Ooker
      Mar 21 at 1:29



















    1












    $begingroup$

    Sugarcoat also fits. If this is intentional in order to have them under control, this can be said as a form of manipulation.



    A reverse effect that the actor may not be aware of that the recipient chose to remember the good information only. This can be described as cherrypick.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      I'm not sure it has an established name, (perhaps "lead with the negative", "bad news first", or “get the bad news out of the way”) but research suggests that people prefer to hear the bad news before the good ones... even though that might lower their chances of changing behavior in reaction to the bad news. (For a free but longer summary of the study see this PT page).



      The body of research in this area is fairly thin though, so I wouldn't put too much stock in it.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "391"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        Edward Byrds is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpsychology.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f21847%2fwhat-is-it-called-to-attack-a-person-then-say-something-uplifting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3












        $begingroup$

        It sounds like a variant on the sandwich technique, which is advocated by some as the preferred way to deliver critical feedback to a person, like a student or employee. The sandwich technique can be defined as:




        ...offer[ing] a piece of negative feedback “sandwiched" between two positive
        ones, thus easing the blow of the critique.




        Note that this technique is criticized, because people might not remember the crucial middle critical part of the message, because of the recency effect: our brains are hardwired to remember the first and last bits of a conversation whilst glossing over the middle part (source: WeQ).






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          3












          $begingroup$

          It sounds like a variant on the sandwich technique, which is advocated by some as the preferred way to deliver critical feedback to a person, like a student or employee. The sandwich technique can be defined as:




          ...offer[ing] a piece of negative feedback “sandwiched" between two positive
          ones, thus easing the blow of the critique.




          Note that this technique is criticized, because people might not remember the crucial middle critical part of the message, because of the recency effect: our brains are hardwired to remember the first and last bits of a conversation whilst glossing over the middle part (source: WeQ).






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            It sounds like a variant on the sandwich technique, which is advocated by some as the preferred way to deliver critical feedback to a person, like a student or employee. The sandwich technique can be defined as:




            ...offer[ing] a piece of negative feedback “sandwiched" between two positive
            ones, thus easing the blow of the critique.




            Note that this technique is criticized, because people might not remember the crucial middle critical part of the message, because of the recency effect: our brains are hardwired to remember the first and last bits of a conversation whilst glossing over the middle part (source: WeQ).






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            It sounds like a variant on the sandwich technique, which is advocated by some as the preferred way to deliver critical feedback to a person, like a student or employee. The sandwich technique can be defined as:




            ...offer[ing] a piece of negative feedback “sandwiched" between two positive
            ones, thus easing the blow of the critique.




            Note that this technique is criticized, because people might not remember the crucial middle critical part of the message, because of the recency effect: our brains are hardwired to remember the first and last bits of a conversation whilst glossing over the middle part (source: WeQ).







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 20 at 16:10

























            answered Mar 20 at 11:29









            AliceDAliceD

            16.9k636125




            16.9k636125























                2












                $begingroup$

                The closest thing I can think of to what you are talking about is loosely referred to as 'Push-Pull'. It happens in a lot of unhealthy relationships and is a favorite tactic of so-called pickup artists. Used appropriately it can be healthy, but it is typically a manipulation tactic. https://outofthefog.website/top-100-trait-blog/2015/11/4/push-pull






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  This reminds me of the cycle of abuse
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ooker
                  Mar 21 at 1:29
















                2












                $begingroup$

                The closest thing I can think of to what you are talking about is loosely referred to as 'Push-Pull'. It happens in a lot of unhealthy relationships and is a favorite tactic of so-called pickup artists. Used appropriately it can be healthy, but it is typically a manipulation tactic. https://outofthefog.website/top-100-trait-blog/2015/11/4/push-pull






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  This reminds me of the cycle of abuse
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ooker
                  Mar 21 at 1:29














                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                The closest thing I can think of to what you are talking about is loosely referred to as 'Push-Pull'. It happens in a lot of unhealthy relationships and is a favorite tactic of so-called pickup artists. Used appropriately it can be healthy, but it is typically a manipulation tactic. https://outofthefog.website/top-100-trait-blog/2015/11/4/push-pull






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$



                The closest thing I can think of to what you are talking about is loosely referred to as 'Push-Pull'. It happens in a lot of unhealthy relationships and is a favorite tactic of so-called pickup artists. Used appropriately it can be healthy, but it is typically a manipulation tactic. https://outofthefog.website/top-100-trait-blog/2015/11/4/push-pull







                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer






                New contributor




                Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                answered Mar 20 at 15:15









                DamienDamien

                313




                313




                New contributor




                Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                New contributor





                Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                Damien is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.












                • $begingroup$
                  This reminds me of the cycle of abuse
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ooker
                  Mar 21 at 1:29


















                • $begingroup$
                  This reminds me of the cycle of abuse
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ooker
                  Mar 21 at 1:29
















                $begingroup$
                This reminds me of the cycle of abuse
                $endgroup$
                – Ooker
                Mar 21 at 1:29




                $begingroup$
                This reminds me of the cycle of abuse
                $endgroup$
                – Ooker
                Mar 21 at 1:29











                1












                $begingroup$

                Sugarcoat also fits. If this is intentional in order to have them under control, this can be said as a form of manipulation.



                A reverse effect that the actor may not be aware of that the recipient chose to remember the good information only. This can be described as cherrypick.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  Sugarcoat also fits. If this is intentional in order to have them under control, this can be said as a form of manipulation.



                  A reverse effect that the actor may not be aware of that the recipient chose to remember the good information only. This can be described as cherrypick.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    Sugarcoat also fits. If this is intentional in order to have them under control, this can be said as a form of manipulation.



                    A reverse effect that the actor may not be aware of that the recipient chose to remember the good information only. This can be described as cherrypick.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    Sugarcoat also fits. If this is intentional in order to have them under control, this can be said as a form of manipulation.



                    A reverse effect that the actor may not be aware of that the recipient chose to remember the good information only. This can be described as cherrypick.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Mar 21 at 1:29

























                    answered Mar 20 at 12:03









                    OokerOoker

                    782222




                    782222























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        I'm not sure it has an established name, (perhaps "lead with the negative", "bad news first", or “get the bad news out of the way”) but research suggests that people prefer to hear the bad news before the good ones... even though that might lower their chances of changing behavior in reaction to the bad news. (For a free but longer summary of the study see this PT page).



                        The body of research in this area is fairly thin though, so I wouldn't put too much stock in it.






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          I'm not sure it has an established name, (perhaps "lead with the negative", "bad news first", or “get the bad news out of the way”) but research suggests that people prefer to hear the bad news before the good ones... even though that might lower their chances of changing behavior in reaction to the bad news. (For a free but longer summary of the study see this PT page).



                          The body of research in this area is fairly thin though, so I wouldn't put too much stock in it.






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            I'm not sure it has an established name, (perhaps "lead with the negative", "bad news first", or “get the bad news out of the way”) but research suggests that people prefer to hear the bad news before the good ones... even though that might lower their chances of changing behavior in reaction to the bad news. (For a free but longer summary of the study see this PT page).



                            The body of research in this area is fairly thin though, so I wouldn't put too much stock in it.






                            share|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            I'm not sure it has an established name, (perhaps "lead with the negative", "bad news first", or “get the bad news out of the way”) but research suggests that people prefer to hear the bad news before the good ones... even though that might lower their chances of changing behavior in reaction to the bad news. (For a free but longer summary of the study see this PT page).



                            The body of research in this area is fairly thin though, so I wouldn't put too much stock in it.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Mar 22 at 4:46

























                            answered Mar 22 at 4:39









                            FizzFizz

                            6,2801037




                            6,2801037






















                                Edward Byrds is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Edward Byrds is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                Edward Byrds is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Edward Byrds is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Psychology & Neuroscience Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpsychology.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f21847%2fwhat-is-it-called-to-attack-a-person-then-say-something-uplifting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                                Alcedinidae

                                Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]