Unexpected indention in bibliography items (beamer)
I have a minimal example where the bibliography entry is intended. I cannot imagine that this is expected behavior. Am I doing something wrong?
documentclass{beamer}
usepackage[backend=bibtex8]{biblatex}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mybib.bib}
@inproceedings{doe2017,
title={A really interesting and long title to illustrate the problem},
author={Doe, John},
booktitle={Some International Conference on Something Really Interesting},
pages={100--200},
year={2017}
}
end{filecontents}
bibliography{mybib}
begin{document}
begin{frame}{Publications}
nocite{doe2017}
printbibliography
end{frame}
end{document}
Output:
beamer biblatex bibliographies
add a comment |
I have a minimal example where the bibliography entry is intended. I cannot imagine that this is expected behavior. Am I doing something wrong?
documentclass{beamer}
usepackage[backend=bibtex8]{biblatex}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mybib.bib}
@inproceedings{doe2017,
title={A really interesting and long title to illustrate the problem},
author={Doe, John},
booktitle={Some International Conference on Something Really Interesting},
pages={100--200},
year={2017}
}
end{filecontents}
bibliography{mybib}
begin{document}
begin{frame}{Publications}
nocite{doe2017}
printbibliography
end{frame}
end{document}
Output:
beamer biblatex bibliographies
2
What indentation are you talking about? The fact that the second and third lines start roughly at the same position as the first line in general? (This would be intentional and is normal for lists in LaTeX.) Or do you mean that there is a slightly misalignment so that the first line starts a tad wider to the right than the other lines? (That probably needs a bit of adjusting and looking at. Not a lot of people seem to be bothered by it, though... otherwise we would have seen more questions about that.)
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:12
1
I expect that "J" of "John" is properly aligned with "p" of "problem". When I have multiline items in an itemize environment they are also properly aligned and the first line of each item is not shifted a bit to the right.
– user179157
Mar 27 at 15:21
2
Ah OK, I'll have something ready for that in a moment.
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:23
Thanks! That really does the trick. I wonder why this never bothered anyone...
– user179157
Mar 27 at 16:13
Well, the space is quite small and if people cite ten or more papers or use a non-numeric style the issue will (probably) not appear because the space reserved for the label is going to be large enough for the icon (though arguably excessive).
– moewe
Mar 27 at 16:15
add a comment |
I have a minimal example where the bibliography entry is intended. I cannot imagine that this is expected behavior. Am I doing something wrong?
documentclass{beamer}
usepackage[backend=bibtex8]{biblatex}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mybib.bib}
@inproceedings{doe2017,
title={A really interesting and long title to illustrate the problem},
author={Doe, John},
booktitle={Some International Conference on Something Really Interesting},
pages={100--200},
year={2017}
}
end{filecontents}
bibliography{mybib}
begin{document}
begin{frame}{Publications}
nocite{doe2017}
printbibliography
end{frame}
end{document}
Output:
beamer biblatex bibliographies
I have a minimal example where the bibliography entry is intended. I cannot imagine that this is expected behavior. Am I doing something wrong?
documentclass{beamer}
usepackage[backend=bibtex8]{biblatex}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mybib.bib}
@inproceedings{doe2017,
title={A really interesting and long title to illustrate the problem},
author={Doe, John},
booktitle={Some International Conference on Something Really Interesting},
pages={100--200},
year={2017}
}
end{filecontents}
bibliography{mybib}
begin{document}
begin{frame}{Publications}
nocite{doe2017}
printbibliography
end{frame}
end{document}
Output:
beamer biblatex bibliographies
beamer biblatex bibliographies
asked Mar 27 at 15:06
user179157user179157
454
454
2
What indentation are you talking about? The fact that the second and third lines start roughly at the same position as the first line in general? (This would be intentional and is normal for lists in LaTeX.) Or do you mean that there is a slightly misalignment so that the first line starts a tad wider to the right than the other lines? (That probably needs a bit of adjusting and looking at. Not a lot of people seem to be bothered by it, though... otherwise we would have seen more questions about that.)
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:12
1
I expect that "J" of "John" is properly aligned with "p" of "problem". When I have multiline items in an itemize environment they are also properly aligned and the first line of each item is not shifted a bit to the right.
– user179157
Mar 27 at 15:21
2
Ah OK, I'll have something ready for that in a moment.
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:23
Thanks! That really does the trick. I wonder why this never bothered anyone...
– user179157
Mar 27 at 16:13
Well, the space is quite small and if people cite ten or more papers or use a non-numeric style the issue will (probably) not appear because the space reserved for the label is going to be large enough for the icon (though arguably excessive).
– moewe
Mar 27 at 16:15
add a comment |
2
What indentation are you talking about? The fact that the second and third lines start roughly at the same position as the first line in general? (This would be intentional and is normal for lists in LaTeX.) Or do you mean that there is a slightly misalignment so that the first line starts a tad wider to the right than the other lines? (That probably needs a bit of adjusting and looking at. Not a lot of people seem to be bothered by it, though... otherwise we would have seen more questions about that.)
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:12
1
I expect that "J" of "John" is properly aligned with "p" of "problem". When I have multiline items in an itemize environment they are also properly aligned and the first line of each item is not shifted a bit to the right.
– user179157
Mar 27 at 15:21
2
Ah OK, I'll have something ready for that in a moment.
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:23
Thanks! That really does the trick. I wonder why this never bothered anyone...
– user179157
Mar 27 at 16:13
Well, the space is quite small and if people cite ten or more papers or use a non-numeric style the issue will (probably) not appear because the space reserved for the label is going to be large enough for the icon (though arguably excessive).
– moewe
Mar 27 at 16:15
2
2
What indentation are you talking about? The fact that the second and third lines start roughly at the same position as the first line in general? (This would be intentional and is normal for lists in LaTeX.) Or do you mean that there is a slightly misalignment so that the first line starts a tad wider to the right than the other lines? (That probably needs a bit of adjusting and looking at. Not a lot of people seem to be bothered by it, though... otherwise we would have seen more questions about that.)
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:12
What indentation are you talking about? The fact that the second and third lines start roughly at the same position as the first line in general? (This would be intentional and is normal for lists in LaTeX.) Or do you mean that there is a slightly misalignment so that the first line starts a tad wider to the right than the other lines? (That probably needs a bit of adjusting and looking at. Not a lot of people seem to be bothered by it, though... otherwise we would have seen more questions about that.)
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:12
1
1
I expect that "J" of "John" is properly aligned with "p" of "problem". When I have multiline items in an itemize environment they are also properly aligned and the first line of each item is not shifted a bit to the right.
– user179157
Mar 27 at 15:21
I expect that "J" of "John" is properly aligned with "p" of "problem". When I have multiline items in an itemize environment they are also properly aligned and the first line of each item is not shifted a bit to the right.
– user179157
Mar 27 at 15:21
2
2
Ah OK, I'll have something ready for that in a moment.
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:23
Ah OK, I'll have something ready for that in a moment.
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:23
Thanks! That really does the trick. I wonder why this never bothered anyone...
– user179157
Mar 27 at 16:13
Thanks! That really does the trick. I wonder why this never bothered anyone...
– user179157
Mar 27 at 16:13
Well, the space is quite small and if people cite ten or more papers or use a non-numeric style the issue will (probably) not appear because the space reserved for the label is going to be large enough for the icon (though arguably excessive).
– moewe
Mar 27 at 16:15
Well, the space is quite small and if people cite ten or more papers or use a non-numeric style the issue will (probably) not appear because the space reserved for the label is going to be large enough for the icon (though arguably excessive).
– moewe
Mar 27 at 16:15
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
In order to be able to align the lines in the bibliography properly biblatex
measures the width of all bibliography labels and uses the longest label to set the list parameters.
But by default beamer
replaces the standard labels that biblatex
would output with its little icons. Those icons may have a slightly different width than the actual labels and so small misalignments can occur in the first line of the bibliography entry if the icon is wider than the calculated label (on the other hand the left margin might be excessive in case the calculated length is far larger than the icon width).
I have reported the issue at https://github.com/josephwright/beamer/issues/531 to discuss a better (hopefully automatic) solution, but in the meantime you can set the relevant biblatex
-calculated width manually (or rather you can manually set a minimum value). After a look at the beamer
sources 14pt
looks like a good minimum value.
documentclass{beamer}
usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
setlength{labelnumberwidth}{14pt}
begin{document}
begin{frame}{Publications}
nocite{sigfridsson}
printbibliography
end{frame}
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481724%2funexpected-indention-in-bibliography-items-beamer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In order to be able to align the lines in the bibliography properly biblatex
measures the width of all bibliography labels and uses the longest label to set the list parameters.
But by default beamer
replaces the standard labels that biblatex
would output with its little icons. Those icons may have a slightly different width than the actual labels and so small misalignments can occur in the first line of the bibliography entry if the icon is wider than the calculated label (on the other hand the left margin might be excessive in case the calculated length is far larger than the icon width).
I have reported the issue at https://github.com/josephwright/beamer/issues/531 to discuss a better (hopefully automatic) solution, but in the meantime you can set the relevant biblatex
-calculated width manually (or rather you can manually set a minimum value). After a look at the beamer
sources 14pt
looks like a good minimum value.
documentclass{beamer}
usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
setlength{labelnumberwidth}{14pt}
begin{document}
begin{frame}{Publications}
nocite{sigfridsson}
printbibliography
end{frame}
end{document}
add a comment |
In order to be able to align the lines in the bibliography properly biblatex
measures the width of all bibliography labels and uses the longest label to set the list parameters.
But by default beamer
replaces the standard labels that biblatex
would output with its little icons. Those icons may have a slightly different width than the actual labels and so small misalignments can occur in the first line of the bibliography entry if the icon is wider than the calculated label (on the other hand the left margin might be excessive in case the calculated length is far larger than the icon width).
I have reported the issue at https://github.com/josephwright/beamer/issues/531 to discuss a better (hopefully automatic) solution, but in the meantime you can set the relevant biblatex
-calculated width manually (or rather you can manually set a minimum value). After a look at the beamer
sources 14pt
looks like a good minimum value.
documentclass{beamer}
usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
setlength{labelnumberwidth}{14pt}
begin{document}
begin{frame}{Publications}
nocite{sigfridsson}
printbibliography
end{frame}
end{document}
add a comment |
In order to be able to align the lines in the bibliography properly biblatex
measures the width of all bibliography labels and uses the longest label to set the list parameters.
But by default beamer
replaces the standard labels that biblatex
would output with its little icons. Those icons may have a slightly different width than the actual labels and so small misalignments can occur in the first line of the bibliography entry if the icon is wider than the calculated label (on the other hand the left margin might be excessive in case the calculated length is far larger than the icon width).
I have reported the issue at https://github.com/josephwright/beamer/issues/531 to discuss a better (hopefully automatic) solution, but in the meantime you can set the relevant biblatex
-calculated width manually (or rather you can manually set a minimum value). After a look at the beamer
sources 14pt
looks like a good minimum value.
documentclass{beamer}
usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
setlength{labelnumberwidth}{14pt}
begin{document}
begin{frame}{Publications}
nocite{sigfridsson}
printbibliography
end{frame}
end{document}
In order to be able to align the lines in the bibliography properly biblatex
measures the width of all bibliography labels and uses the longest label to set the list parameters.
But by default beamer
replaces the standard labels that biblatex
would output with its little icons. Those icons may have a slightly different width than the actual labels and so small misalignments can occur in the first line of the bibliography entry if the icon is wider than the calculated label (on the other hand the left margin might be excessive in case the calculated length is far larger than the icon width).
I have reported the issue at https://github.com/josephwright/beamer/issues/531 to discuss a better (hopefully automatic) solution, but in the meantime you can set the relevant biblatex
-calculated width manually (or rather you can manually set a minimum value). After a look at the beamer
sources 14pt
looks like a good minimum value.
documentclass{beamer}
usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
setlength{labelnumberwidth}{14pt}
begin{document}
begin{frame}{Publications}
nocite{sigfridsson}
printbibliography
end{frame}
end{document}
edited Mar 27 at 15:45
answered Mar 27 at 15:38
moewemoewe
96.5k10118362
96.5k10118362
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481724%2funexpected-indention-in-bibliography-items-beamer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
What indentation are you talking about? The fact that the second and third lines start roughly at the same position as the first line in general? (This would be intentional and is normal for lists in LaTeX.) Or do you mean that there is a slightly misalignment so that the first line starts a tad wider to the right than the other lines? (That probably needs a bit of adjusting and looking at. Not a lot of people seem to be bothered by it, though... otherwise we would have seen more questions about that.)
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:12
1
I expect that "J" of "John" is properly aligned with "p" of "problem". When I have multiline items in an itemize environment they are also properly aligned and the first line of each item is not shifted a bit to the right.
– user179157
Mar 27 at 15:21
2
Ah OK, I'll have something ready for that in a moment.
– moewe
Mar 27 at 15:23
Thanks! That really does the trick. I wonder why this never bothered anyone...
– user179157
Mar 27 at 16:13
Well, the space is quite small and if people cite ten or more papers or use a non-numeric style the issue will (probably) not appear because the space reserved for the label is going to be large enough for the icon (though arguably excessive).
– moewe
Mar 27 at 16:15