Was a professor correct to chastise me for writing “Prof. X” rather than “Professor X”?












73















I emailed Professor X regarding typos in, and questions on, his book. I've never met and contacted him. My email commenced with this salutation:




Dear Prof. X




He replied




It is customary to address professors by their title in full, just as most people would not abbreviate the full names of people whom they do not know well.




His unpleasantness startled me. Is he correct though? If he is, wouldn't we have to write Mr. in full as Mister or even Master?



My response to comments:



I'd rather not impart more particulars on Prof. X, in case he persecutes me! I'll just say that he's Caucasian, and in Australasia, North America or UK. English is definitely his native language.










share|improve this question

























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – eykanal
    Mar 29 at 20:49
















73















I emailed Professor X regarding typos in, and questions on, his book. I've never met and contacted him. My email commenced with this salutation:




Dear Prof. X




He replied




It is customary to address professors by their title in full, just as most people would not abbreviate the full names of people whom they do not know well.




His unpleasantness startled me. Is he correct though? If he is, wouldn't we have to write Mr. in full as Mister or even Master?



My response to comments:



I'd rather not impart more particulars on Prof. X, in case he persecutes me! I'll just say that he's Caucasian, and in Australasia, North America or UK. English is definitely his native language.










share|improve this question

























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – eykanal
    Mar 29 at 20:49














73












73








73


5






I emailed Professor X regarding typos in, and questions on, his book. I've never met and contacted him. My email commenced with this salutation:




Dear Prof. X




He replied




It is customary to address professors by their title in full, just as most people would not abbreviate the full names of people whom they do not know well.




His unpleasantness startled me. Is he correct though? If he is, wouldn't we have to write Mr. in full as Mister or even Master?



My response to comments:



I'd rather not impart more particulars on Prof. X, in case he persecutes me! I'll just say that he's Caucasian, and in Australasia, North America or UK. English is definitely his native language.










share|improve this question
















I emailed Professor X regarding typos in, and questions on, his book. I've never met and contacted him. My email commenced with this salutation:




Dear Prof. X




He replied




It is customary to address professors by their title in full, just as most people would not abbreviate the full names of people whom they do not know well.




His unpleasantness startled me. Is he correct though? If he is, wouldn't we have to write Mr. in full as Mister or even Master?



My response to comments:



I'd rather not impart more particulars on Prof. X, in case he persecutes me! I'll just say that he's Caucasian, and in Australasia, North America or UK. English is definitely his native language.







email






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 29 at 7:49









corey979

4,27052233




4,27052233










asked Mar 28 at 2:46









AntinatalistAntinatalist

419127




419127













  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – eykanal
    Mar 29 at 20:49



















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – eykanal
    Mar 29 at 20:49

















Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– eykanal
Mar 29 at 20:49





Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– eykanal
Mar 29 at 20:49










10 Answers
10






active

oldest

votes


















15














One possibility is that Prof. Mill is attempting make a general point to you about communication.



Perhaps he found your message trivial, petty, or condescending. (Whether or not that is justified, I have no idea, since you don't include your message; but regardless, it's possible he took it that way.) He may have felt that "showing" you how that comes across was the best way to respond. (Again, I don't endorse that, but I think it's a possibility.)



So, he may have just taken the first "petty" response that came to mind, and settled on that, intending to demonstrate to you that your own tone was not particularly effective at gaining a sympathetic response.



I agree with the (downvoted) answer from @Artoo. Unless you have reason to cultivate a relationship with this person, I think you'd do well to avoid worrying too much about what he thinks of you. If you do have an interest in cultivating a relationship, you'd do well to develop a full understanding of why he said what he did, rather than trying to evaluate its accuracy.






share|improve this answer
























  • I concur. It's a pity that a college-educated adult, never mind a professor, conflates the procedural with the substantive. However, as you point out, this could be a learning experience for the OP.

    – John Rabson Jr
    Mar 29 at 8:11











  • While this is certainly possible (I mentioned it also in my answer), we should perhaps avoid deifying professors and assuming that every syllable is intended to make an important point that students should learn from. I think it's more likely that he's just a jerk :-)

    – cag51
    yesterday













  • There's a reasonably big gulf between "I don't endorse that" and deification ;)

    – Pete Forsyth
    yesterday



















163














What a jerk! No, writing "Prof." is perfectly fine; his reaction is both incorrect and completely inappropriate. I cannot imagine any professor I know (even the ones I don't like) writing such a thing.



What country is this guy in? Some countries (e.g., Germany) have stricter rules for such things, but I'm still shocked he would respond like this.




regarding typos in ... his book




Ah. Is it possible he's being snarky about your abbreviation since you criticized his typos? If your e-mail had a condescending tone, maybe he is trying to "bite back." That's the only thing I can think of.






share|improve this answer


























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – eykanal
    Mar 29 at 20:50



















34














As others have mentioned, this of course depends on context, some societies may be more righteous than others about this issue.



Also, I'll be assuming that the issue was about "Prof." and not about including degrees/other titles. If the issue is the latter, I assume it is really standard and that the prof has them clearly displayed somewhere for you to see?



Regarding "Prof.", I did a search over my emails looking for the exact string "Prof.". What I found: I have been addressed as "Prof. Argerami" in emails a bit more than a thousand times. There were emails from (many of each)




  • Scientific Organizations (including the International Mathematical Union and the American Mathematical Society, for instance)


  • Conference Organizers


  • Journal Editors/Editorial Systems


  • Students


  • Other professors and researchers


  • University staff



In summary, in my experience "Prof." seems to be extremely common.






share|improve this answer



















  • 7





    +1 for data! Just out of curiosity, would you have numbers for how often you've been referred to as "Professor Argerami", "Prof Argerami", "Dr. Argerami", etc.? I mean, even if you've been called "Professor" far more often than "Prof.", it wouldn't invalidate your point that "Prof." has been common; just curious.

    – Nat
    Mar 29 at 3:06








  • 11





    Indeed, I checked that briefly. In my emails from the last 17 years, I found "Prof. Argerami" 1095 times, and "Professor Argerami" 754 times.

    – Martin Argerami
    Mar 29 at 4:38



















20














Surely 'Prof.' is as valid as 'Mr.' or 'Dr.'?






share|improve this answer
























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – eykanal
    Mar 29 at 20:50



















15














I disagree with the vehemence of other answers. My experience has been that some students understand very little of the very tiny amounts of protocol we tend to follow in academia. As a result, the way that they address faculty, both in writing and in person, varies between rather informal and somewhat insulting. I think it is perfectly reasonable to try to address this problem right from the start, to avoid future issues. It is nice that some professors are perfectly fine with informality. But that does not mean that their view is the correct one and if some colleagues disagree they are then jerks or anything of the sort. You sort of have to learn to navigate between different levels of comfort.



My advice would be to address faculty in a formal way in general. Many will quickly request that you 'relax' and address them differently. Others may not tell you directly but it will be clear from their interactions. Still others may appreciate the formality and welcome it.






share|improve this answer
























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – eykanal
    Mar 29 at 20:51



















9














Are you sure they meant professor instead of Prof.
It could be that this person is a "Mr. Prof. Dr. Eng. " and they expected you to use all, you can look at how they have signed the book.



Even in the latter case, Prof. is absolutely fine.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    Even in countries that do us all these titles obsessively, it is enough to use just Prof. in most circumstances (certainly when addressing a person).

    – Vladimir F
    Mar 28 at 10:24






  • 1





    Correct, that is what I was trying to say. I edit my response to be more explicit.

    – U3.1415926
    Mar 28 at 10:54








  • 6





    If you want to write in a gender-neutral way, you can use "they" instead of "s/he". Ie: "Are you sure they meant..." "... and they expected you to use all..." "... how they signed the book."

    – Aaron
    Mar 28 at 15:52











  • Thanks @Aaron, text edited!

    – U3.1415926
    Mar 29 at 7:32



















2














Looks like he's trying to pick you up on your grammar in retaliation. To me his response seems half serious, half ironic; so I would take it as such.






share|improve this answer































    1














    The ONLY way I can see someone getting ticked at this is if you said "Prof" without a period showing an abbreviation, and that wouldn't be justified.



    "Dr. Octopus" is a perfectly formal address line. You would rarely see "Doctor Octopus". I think it borders on archaic use. "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period.



    "Doc Octopus", however, is very informal, probably too informal for some situations.



    Now, lets move to "Professor". "Prof." is a fine abbreviation, and maintains a level of formality. I'd say "Prof" is the same, with a slightly casual drop of a period, but suggest the person you're interacting with might be placing it in the "Doc" category.



    Of course, such things will differ by background. Take a peek at https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/71086/20457 regarding the use of "Herr Professor Doktor" and the lack of formality of dropping "Herr"



    All that said, perhaps this was just displaced annoyance, and the real issue was the letter pointing out typos in a book.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Thanks, @MontyHarder

      – Scott Seidman
      Mar 29 at 20:44











    • "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period": Note that in British English it's common to drop periods in abbreviations and initials (see e.g. Dr in the Oxford dictionary).

      – Massimo Ortolano
      Mar 29 at 22:41



















    0














    Although I find it very unusual the professor doesn't approve of you using the Prof. abbreviation, he is able to state his preference for how you address him. Some people are VERY particular and some people are highly functional despite having psychological problems. I think the key takeaway is that the professor clearly has a preference for how to be addressed and directly communicated that desire. I would advise you not to use the Prof. abbreviation with this professor, but feel free to use it for others, since it is generally accepted.



    As far as the reasoning the professor provided, it's complete BS. We abbreviate Mrs., Dr., Mr., PhD, etc. It's not customary to provide the full title.






    share|improve this answer































      -1















      1. His reply is a little pompous, but he is correct that you should not abbreviate professor (within a salutation). Don't abbreviate senator either when writing to one.


      2. I'm not sure that "chastise" is completely accurate. Maybe "correcting you" is kinder wording. Also, not sure why this is so important to you to come to Q&A site with wounds to show. It's not a big deal.


      3. Since you are trying to get some help from the person, I suggest to drop YOUR woundedness AND ignore HIS pompousness and just soldier on and discuss the content.







      share|improve this answer





















      • 3





        Not knowing proper etiquette and asking about it does make a good question. First and foremost because now I know if the situation ever arises for me.

        – CramerTV
        Mar 28 at 23:51








      • 6





        Could you provide a source for your first claim? I've been a professor for more than 20 years in the US and have never heard of a distinction between spelling out "Professor" and using the abbreviation "Prof."

        – Ellen Spertus
        Mar 29 at 2:30






      • 1





        (1) [citation needed]. (2) Who is wounded? Kinder wording would be that OP is probably wondering whether he should avoid using "Dear Prof. X" with other professors [and I see no reason why he should avoid the construction]. (3) Hard to say without the full context, but this snippet is so bizarre and hostile that I would carefully consider whether I wanted to pursue a relationship with this Prof. [sic] Millar further. This may be another reason why OP posted here.

        – cag51
        Mar 29 at 3:23












      protected by StrongBad Mar 28 at 17:32



      Thank you for your interest in this question.
      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














      10 Answers
      10






      active

      oldest

      votes








      10 Answers
      10






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      15














      One possibility is that Prof. Mill is attempting make a general point to you about communication.



      Perhaps he found your message trivial, petty, or condescending. (Whether or not that is justified, I have no idea, since you don't include your message; but regardless, it's possible he took it that way.) He may have felt that "showing" you how that comes across was the best way to respond. (Again, I don't endorse that, but I think it's a possibility.)



      So, he may have just taken the first "petty" response that came to mind, and settled on that, intending to demonstrate to you that your own tone was not particularly effective at gaining a sympathetic response.



      I agree with the (downvoted) answer from @Artoo. Unless you have reason to cultivate a relationship with this person, I think you'd do well to avoid worrying too much about what he thinks of you. If you do have an interest in cultivating a relationship, you'd do well to develop a full understanding of why he said what he did, rather than trying to evaluate its accuracy.






      share|improve this answer
























      • I concur. It's a pity that a college-educated adult, never mind a professor, conflates the procedural with the substantive. However, as you point out, this could be a learning experience for the OP.

        – John Rabson Jr
        Mar 29 at 8:11











      • While this is certainly possible (I mentioned it also in my answer), we should perhaps avoid deifying professors and assuming that every syllable is intended to make an important point that students should learn from. I think it's more likely that he's just a jerk :-)

        – cag51
        yesterday













      • There's a reasonably big gulf between "I don't endorse that" and deification ;)

        – Pete Forsyth
        yesterday
















      15














      One possibility is that Prof. Mill is attempting make a general point to you about communication.



      Perhaps he found your message trivial, petty, or condescending. (Whether or not that is justified, I have no idea, since you don't include your message; but regardless, it's possible he took it that way.) He may have felt that "showing" you how that comes across was the best way to respond. (Again, I don't endorse that, but I think it's a possibility.)



      So, he may have just taken the first "petty" response that came to mind, and settled on that, intending to demonstrate to you that your own tone was not particularly effective at gaining a sympathetic response.



      I agree with the (downvoted) answer from @Artoo. Unless you have reason to cultivate a relationship with this person, I think you'd do well to avoid worrying too much about what he thinks of you. If you do have an interest in cultivating a relationship, you'd do well to develop a full understanding of why he said what he did, rather than trying to evaluate its accuracy.






      share|improve this answer
























      • I concur. It's a pity that a college-educated adult, never mind a professor, conflates the procedural with the substantive. However, as you point out, this could be a learning experience for the OP.

        – John Rabson Jr
        Mar 29 at 8:11











      • While this is certainly possible (I mentioned it also in my answer), we should perhaps avoid deifying professors and assuming that every syllable is intended to make an important point that students should learn from. I think it's more likely that he's just a jerk :-)

        – cag51
        yesterday













      • There's a reasonably big gulf between "I don't endorse that" and deification ;)

        – Pete Forsyth
        yesterday














      15












      15








      15







      One possibility is that Prof. Mill is attempting make a general point to you about communication.



      Perhaps he found your message trivial, petty, or condescending. (Whether or not that is justified, I have no idea, since you don't include your message; but regardless, it's possible he took it that way.) He may have felt that "showing" you how that comes across was the best way to respond. (Again, I don't endorse that, but I think it's a possibility.)



      So, he may have just taken the first "petty" response that came to mind, and settled on that, intending to demonstrate to you that your own tone was not particularly effective at gaining a sympathetic response.



      I agree with the (downvoted) answer from @Artoo. Unless you have reason to cultivate a relationship with this person, I think you'd do well to avoid worrying too much about what he thinks of you. If you do have an interest in cultivating a relationship, you'd do well to develop a full understanding of why he said what he did, rather than trying to evaluate its accuracy.






      share|improve this answer













      One possibility is that Prof. Mill is attempting make a general point to you about communication.



      Perhaps he found your message trivial, petty, or condescending. (Whether or not that is justified, I have no idea, since you don't include your message; but regardless, it's possible he took it that way.) He may have felt that "showing" you how that comes across was the best way to respond. (Again, I don't endorse that, but I think it's a possibility.)



      So, he may have just taken the first "petty" response that came to mind, and settled on that, intending to demonstrate to you that your own tone was not particularly effective at gaining a sympathetic response.



      I agree with the (downvoted) answer from @Artoo. Unless you have reason to cultivate a relationship with this person, I think you'd do well to avoid worrying too much about what he thinks of you. If you do have an interest in cultivating a relationship, you'd do well to develop a full understanding of why he said what he did, rather than trying to evaluate its accuracy.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 28 at 16:36









      Pete ForsythPete Forsyth

      620410




      620410













      • I concur. It's a pity that a college-educated adult, never mind a professor, conflates the procedural with the substantive. However, as you point out, this could be a learning experience for the OP.

        – John Rabson Jr
        Mar 29 at 8:11











      • While this is certainly possible (I mentioned it also in my answer), we should perhaps avoid deifying professors and assuming that every syllable is intended to make an important point that students should learn from. I think it's more likely that he's just a jerk :-)

        – cag51
        yesterday













      • There's a reasonably big gulf between "I don't endorse that" and deification ;)

        – Pete Forsyth
        yesterday



















      • I concur. It's a pity that a college-educated adult, never mind a professor, conflates the procedural with the substantive. However, as you point out, this could be a learning experience for the OP.

        – John Rabson Jr
        Mar 29 at 8:11











      • While this is certainly possible (I mentioned it also in my answer), we should perhaps avoid deifying professors and assuming that every syllable is intended to make an important point that students should learn from. I think it's more likely that he's just a jerk :-)

        – cag51
        yesterday













      • There's a reasonably big gulf between "I don't endorse that" and deification ;)

        – Pete Forsyth
        yesterday

















      I concur. It's a pity that a college-educated adult, never mind a professor, conflates the procedural with the substantive. However, as you point out, this could be a learning experience for the OP.

      – John Rabson Jr
      Mar 29 at 8:11





      I concur. It's a pity that a college-educated adult, never mind a professor, conflates the procedural with the substantive. However, as you point out, this could be a learning experience for the OP.

      – John Rabson Jr
      Mar 29 at 8:11













      While this is certainly possible (I mentioned it also in my answer), we should perhaps avoid deifying professors and assuming that every syllable is intended to make an important point that students should learn from. I think it's more likely that he's just a jerk :-)

      – cag51
      yesterday







      While this is certainly possible (I mentioned it also in my answer), we should perhaps avoid deifying professors and assuming that every syllable is intended to make an important point that students should learn from. I think it's more likely that he's just a jerk :-)

      – cag51
      yesterday















      There's a reasonably big gulf between "I don't endorse that" and deification ;)

      – Pete Forsyth
      yesterday





      There's a reasonably big gulf between "I don't endorse that" and deification ;)

      – Pete Forsyth
      yesterday











      163














      What a jerk! No, writing "Prof." is perfectly fine; his reaction is both incorrect and completely inappropriate. I cannot imagine any professor I know (even the ones I don't like) writing such a thing.



      What country is this guy in? Some countries (e.g., Germany) have stricter rules for such things, but I'm still shocked he would respond like this.




      regarding typos in ... his book




      Ah. Is it possible he's being snarky about your abbreviation since you criticized his typos? If your e-mail had a condescending tone, maybe he is trying to "bite back." That's the only thing I can think of.






      share|improve this answer


























      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:50
















      163














      What a jerk! No, writing "Prof." is perfectly fine; his reaction is both incorrect and completely inappropriate. I cannot imagine any professor I know (even the ones I don't like) writing such a thing.



      What country is this guy in? Some countries (e.g., Germany) have stricter rules for such things, but I'm still shocked he would respond like this.




      regarding typos in ... his book




      Ah. Is it possible he's being snarky about your abbreviation since you criticized his typos? If your e-mail had a condescending tone, maybe he is trying to "bite back." That's the only thing I can think of.






      share|improve this answer


























      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:50














      163












      163








      163







      What a jerk! No, writing "Prof." is perfectly fine; his reaction is both incorrect and completely inappropriate. I cannot imagine any professor I know (even the ones I don't like) writing such a thing.



      What country is this guy in? Some countries (e.g., Germany) have stricter rules for such things, but I'm still shocked he would respond like this.




      regarding typos in ... his book




      Ah. Is it possible he's being snarky about your abbreviation since you criticized his typos? If your e-mail had a condescending tone, maybe he is trying to "bite back." That's the only thing I can think of.






      share|improve this answer















      What a jerk! No, writing "Prof." is perfectly fine; his reaction is both incorrect and completely inappropriate. I cannot imagine any professor I know (even the ones I don't like) writing such a thing.



      What country is this guy in? Some countries (e.g., Germany) have stricter rules for such things, but I'm still shocked he would respond like this.




      regarding typos in ... his book




      Ah. Is it possible he's being snarky about your abbreviation since you criticized his typos? If your e-mail had a condescending tone, maybe he is trying to "bite back." That's the only thing I can think of.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 28 at 3:24

























      answered Mar 28 at 2:54









      cag51cag51

      18.3k93869




      18.3k93869













      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:50



















      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:50

















      Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

      – eykanal
      Mar 29 at 20:50





      Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

      – eykanal
      Mar 29 at 20:50











      34














      As others have mentioned, this of course depends on context, some societies may be more righteous than others about this issue.



      Also, I'll be assuming that the issue was about "Prof." and not about including degrees/other titles. If the issue is the latter, I assume it is really standard and that the prof has them clearly displayed somewhere for you to see?



      Regarding "Prof.", I did a search over my emails looking for the exact string "Prof.". What I found: I have been addressed as "Prof. Argerami" in emails a bit more than a thousand times. There were emails from (many of each)




      • Scientific Organizations (including the International Mathematical Union and the American Mathematical Society, for instance)


      • Conference Organizers


      • Journal Editors/Editorial Systems


      • Students


      • Other professors and researchers


      • University staff



      In summary, in my experience "Prof." seems to be extremely common.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 7





        +1 for data! Just out of curiosity, would you have numbers for how often you've been referred to as "Professor Argerami", "Prof Argerami", "Dr. Argerami", etc.? I mean, even if you've been called "Professor" far more often than "Prof.", it wouldn't invalidate your point that "Prof." has been common; just curious.

        – Nat
        Mar 29 at 3:06








      • 11





        Indeed, I checked that briefly. In my emails from the last 17 years, I found "Prof. Argerami" 1095 times, and "Professor Argerami" 754 times.

        – Martin Argerami
        Mar 29 at 4:38
















      34














      As others have mentioned, this of course depends on context, some societies may be more righteous than others about this issue.



      Also, I'll be assuming that the issue was about "Prof." and not about including degrees/other titles. If the issue is the latter, I assume it is really standard and that the prof has them clearly displayed somewhere for you to see?



      Regarding "Prof.", I did a search over my emails looking for the exact string "Prof.". What I found: I have been addressed as "Prof. Argerami" in emails a bit more than a thousand times. There were emails from (many of each)




      • Scientific Organizations (including the International Mathematical Union and the American Mathematical Society, for instance)


      • Conference Organizers


      • Journal Editors/Editorial Systems


      • Students


      • Other professors and researchers


      • University staff



      In summary, in my experience "Prof." seems to be extremely common.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 7





        +1 for data! Just out of curiosity, would you have numbers for how often you've been referred to as "Professor Argerami", "Prof Argerami", "Dr. Argerami", etc.? I mean, even if you've been called "Professor" far more often than "Prof.", it wouldn't invalidate your point that "Prof." has been common; just curious.

        – Nat
        Mar 29 at 3:06








      • 11





        Indeed, I checked that briefly. In my emails from the last 17 years, I found "Prof. Argerami" 1095 times, and "Professor Argerami" 754 times.

        – Martin Argerami
        Mar 29 at 4:38














      34












      34








      34







      As others have mentioned, this of course depends on context, some societies may be more righteous than others about this issue.



      Also, I'll be assuming that the issue was about "Prof." and not about including degrees/other titles. If the issue is the latter, I assume it is really standard and that the prof has them clearly displayed somewhere for you to see?



      Regarding "Prof.", I did a search over my emails looking for the exact string "Prof.". What I found: I have been addressed as "Prof. Argerami" in emails a bit more than a thousand times. There were emails from (many of each)




      • Scientific Organizations (including the International Mathematical Union and the American Mathematical Society, for instance)


      • Conference Organizers


      • Journal Editors/Editorial Systems


      • Students


      • Other professors and researchers


      • University staff



      In summary, in my experience "Prof." seems to be extremely common.






      share|improve this answer













      As others have mentioned, this of course depends on context, some societies may be more righteous than others about this issue.



      Also, I'll be assuming that the issue was about "Prof." and not about including degrees/other titles. If the issue is the latter, I assume it is really standard and that the prof has them clearly displayed somewhere for you to see?



      Regarding "Prof.", I did a search over my emails looking for the exact string "Prof.". What I found: I have been addressed as "Prof. Argerami" in emails a bit more than a thousand times. There were emails from (many of each)




      • Scientific Organizations (including the International Mathematical Union and the American Mathematical Society, for instance)


      • Conference Organizers


      • Journal Editors/Editorial Systems


      • Students


      • Other professors and researchers


      • University staff



      In summary, in my experience "Prof." seems to be extremely common.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 28 at 14:50









      Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami

      3,4531421




      3,4531421








      • 7





        +1 for data! Just out of curiosity, would you have numbers for how often you've been referred to as "Professor Argerami", "Prof Argerami", "Dr. Argerami", etc.? I mean, even if you've been called "Professor" far more often than "Prof.", it wouldn't invalidate your point that "Prof." has been common; just curious.

        – Nat
        Mar 29 at 3:06








      • 11





        Indeed, I checked that briefly. In my emails from the last 17 years, I found "Prof. Argerami" 1095 times, and "Professor Argerami" 754 times.

        – Martin Argerami
        Mar 29 at 4:38














      • 7





        +1 for data! Just out of curiosity, would you have numbers for how often you've been referred to as "Professor Argerami", "Prof Argerami", "Dr. Argerami", etc.? I mean, even if you've been called "Professor" far more often than "Prof.", it wouldn't invalidate your point that "Prof." has been common; just curious.

        – Nat
        Mar 29 at 3:06








      • 11





        Indeed, I checked that briefly. In my emails from the last 17 years, I found "Prof. Argerami" 1095 times, and "Professor Argerami" 754 times.

        – Martin Argerami
        Mar 29 at 4:38








      7




      7





      +1 for data! Just out of curiosity, would you have numbers for how often you've been referred to as "Professor Argerami", "Prof Argerami", "Dr. Argerami", etc.? I mean, even if you've been called "Professor" far more often than "Prof.", it wouldn't invalidate your point that "Prof." has been common; just curious.

      – Nat
      Mar 29 at 3:06







      +1 for data! Just out of curiosity, would you have numbers for how often you've been referred to as "Professor Argerami", "Prof Argerami", "Dr. Argerami", etc.? I mean, even if you've been called "Professor" far more often than "Prof.", it wouldn't invalidate your point that "Prof." has been common; just curious.

      – Nat
      Mar 29 at 3:06






      11




      11





      Indeed, I checked that briefly. In my emails from the last 17 years, I found "Prof. Argerami" 1095 times, and "Professor Argerami" 754 times.

      – Martin Argerami
      Mar 29 at 4:38





      Indeed, I checked that briefly. In my emails from the last 17 years, I found "Prof. Argerami" 1095 times, and "Professor Argerami" 754 times.

      – Martin Argerami
      Mar 29 at 4:38











      20














      Surely 'Prof.' is as valid as 'Mr.' or 'Dr.'?






      share|improve this answer
























      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:50
















      20














      Surely 'Prof.' is as valid as 'Mr.' or 'Dr.'?






      share|improve this answer
























      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:50














      20












      20








      20







      Surely 'Prof.' is as valid as 'Mr.' or 'Dr.'?






      share|improve this answer













      Surely 'Prof.' is as valid as 'Mr.' or 'Dr.'?







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 28 at 7:40









      John Rabson JrJohn Rabson Jr

      4665




      4665













      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:50



















      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:50

















      Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

      – eykanal
      Mar 29 at 20:50





      Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

      – eykanal
      Mar 29 at 20:50











      15














      I disagree with the vehemence of other answers. My experience has been that some students understand very little of the very tiny amounts of protocol we tend to follow in academia. As a result, the way that they address faculty, both in writing and in person, varies between rather informal and somewhat insulting. I think it is perfectly reasonable to try to address this problem right from the start, to avoid future issues. It is nice that some professors are perfectly fine with informality. But that does not mean that their view is the correct one and if some colleagues disagree they are then jerks or anything of the sort. You sort of have to learn to navigate between different levels of comfort.



      My advice would be to address faculty in a formal way in general. Many will quickly request that you 'relax' and address them differently. Others may not tell you directly but it will be clear from their interactions. Still others may appreciate the formality and welcome it.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:51
















      15














      I disagree with the vehemence of other answers. My experience has been that some students understand very little of the very tiny amounts of protocol we tend to follow in academia. As a result, the way that they address faculty, both in writing and in person, varies between rather informal and somewhat insulting. I think it is perfectly reasonable to try to address this problem right from the start, to avoid future issues. It is nice that some professors are perfectly fine with informality. But that does not mean that their view is the correct one and if some colleagues disagree they are then jerks or anything of the sort. You sort of have to learn to navigate between different levels of comfort.



      My advice would be to address faculty in a formal way in general. Many will quickly request that you 'relax' and address them differently. Others may not tell you directly but it will be clear from their interactions. Still others may appreciate the formality and welcome it.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:51














      15












      15








      15







      I disagree with the vehemence of other answers. My experience has been that some students understand very little of the very tiny amounts of protocol we tend to follow in academia. As a result, the way that they address faculty, both in writing and in person, varies between rather informal and somewhat insulting. I think it is perfectly reasonable to try to address this problem right from the start, to avoid future issues. It is nice that some professors are perfectly fine with informality. But that does not mean that their view is the correct one and if some colleagues disagree they are then jerks or anything of the sort. You sort of have to learn to navigate between different levels of comfort.



      My advice would be to address faculty in a formal way in general. Many will quickly request that you 'relax' and address them differently. Others may not tell you directly but it will be clear from their interactions. Still others may appreciate the formality and welcome it.






      share|improve this answer













      I disagree with the vehemence of other answers. My experience has been that some students understand very little of the very tiny amounts of protocol we tend to follow in academia. As a result, the way that they address faculty, both in writing and in person, varies between rather informal and somewhat insulting. I think it is perfectly reasonable to try to address this problem right from the start, to avoid future issues. It is nice that some professors are perfectly fine with informality. But that does not mean that their view is the correct one and if some colleagues disagree they are then jerks or anything of the sort. You sort of have to learn to navigate between different levels of comfort.



      My advice would be to address faculty in a formal way in general. Many will quickly request that you 'relax' and address them differently. Others may not tell you directly but it will be clear from their interactions. Still others may appreciate the formality and welcome it.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 28 at 11:55









      Andrés E. CaicedoAndrés E. Caicedo

      766810




      766810













      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:51



















      • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

        – eykanal
        Mar 29 at 20:51

















      Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

      – eykanal
      Mar 29 at 20:51





      Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

      – eykanal
      Mar 29 at 20:51











      9














      Are you sure they meant professor instead of Prof.
      It could be that this person is a "Mr. Prof. Dr. Eng. " and they expected you to use all, you can look at how they have signed the book.



      Even in the latter case, Prof. is absolutely fine.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 3





        Even in countries that do us all these titles obsessively, it is enough to use just Prof. in most circumstances (certainly when addressing a person).

        – Vladimir F
        Mar 28 at 10:24






      • 1





        Correct, that is what I was trying to say. I edit my response to be more explicit.

        – U3.1415926
        Mar 28 at 10:54








      • 6





        If you want to write in a gender-neutral way, you can use "they" instead of "s/he". Ie: "Are you sure they meant..." "... and they expected you to use all..." "... how they signed the book."

        – Aaron
        Mar 28 at 15:52











      • Thanks @Aaron, text edited!

        – U3.1415926
        Mar 29 at 7:32
















      9














      Are you sure they meant professor instead of Prof.
      It could be that this person is a "Mr. Prof. Dr. Eng. " and they expected you to use all, you can look at how they have signed the book.



      Even in the latter case, Prof. is absolutely fine.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 3





        Even in countries that do us all these titles obsessively, it is enough to use just Prof. in most circumstances (certainly when addressing a person).

        – Vladimir F
        Mar 28 at 10:24






      • 1





        Correct, that is what I was trying to say. I edit my response to be more explicit.

        – U3.1415926
        Mar 28 at 10:54








      • 6





        If you want to write in a gender-neutral way, you can use "they" instead of "s/he". Ie: "Are you sure they meant..." "... and they expected you to use all..." "... how they signed the book."

        – Aaron
        Mar 28 at 15:52











      • Thanks @Aaron, text edited!

        – U3.1415926
        Mar 29 at 7:32














      9












      9








      9







      Are you sure they meant professor instead of Prof.
      It could be that this person is a "Mr. Prof. Dr. Eng. " and they expected you to use all, you can look at how they have signed the book.



      Even in the latter case, Prof. is absolutely fine.






      share|improve this answer















      Are you sure they meant professor instead of Prof.
      It could be that this person is a "Mr. Prof. Dr. Eng. " and they expected you to use all, you can look at how they have signed the book.



      Even in the latter case, Prof. is absolutely fine.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 29 at 7:31

























      answered Mar 28 at 10:18









      U3.1415926U3.1415926

      1995




      1995








      • 3





        Even in countries that do us all these titles obsessively, it is enough to use just Prof. in most circumstances (certainly when addressing a person).

        – Vladimir F
        Mar 28 at 10:24






      • 1





        Correct, that is what I was trying to say. I edit my response to be more explicit.

        – U3.1415926
        Mar 28 at 10:54








      • 6





        If you want to write in a gender-neutral way, you can use "they" instead of "s/he". Ie: "Are you sure they meant..." "... and they expected you to use all..." "... how they signed the book."

        – Aaron
        Mar 28 at 15:52











      • Thanks @Aaron, text edited!

        – U3.1415926
        Mar 29 at 7:32














      • 3





        Even in countries that do us all these titles obsessively, it is enough to use just Prof. in most circumstances (certainly when addressing a person).

        – Vladimir F
        Mar 28 at 10:24






      • 1





        Correct, that is what I was trying to say. I edit my response to be more explicit.

        – U3.1415926
        Mar 28 at 10:54








      • 6





        If you want to write in a gender-neutral way, you can use "they" instead of "s/he". Ie: "Are you sure they meant..." "... and they expected you to use all..." "... how they signed the book."

        – Aaron
        Mar 28 at 15:52











      • Thanks @Aaron, text edited!

        – U3.1415926
        Mar 29 at 7:32








      3




      3





      Even in countries that do us all these titles obsessively, it is enough to use just Prof. in most circumstances (certainly when addressing a person).

      – Vladimir F
      Mar 28 at 10:24





      Even in countries that do us all these titles obsessively, it is enough to use just Prof. in most circumstances (certainly when addressing a person).

      – Vladimir F
      Mar 28 at 10:24




      1




      1





      Correct, that is what I was trying to say. I edit my response to be more explicit.

      – U3.1415926
      Mar 28 at 10:54







      Correct, that is what I was trying to say. I edit my response to be more explicit.

      – U3.1415926
      Mar 28 at 10:54






      6




      6





      If you want to write in a gender-neutral way, you can use "they" instead of "s/he". Ie: "Are you sure they meant..." "... and they expected you to use all..." "... how they signed the book."

      – Aaron
      Mar 28 at 15:52





      If you want to write in a gender-neutral way, you can use "they" instead of "s/he". Ie: "Are you sure they meant..." "... and they expected you to use all..." "... how they signed the book."

      – Aaron
      Mar 28 at 15:52













      Thanks @Aaron, text edited!

      – U3.1415926
      Mar 29 at 7:32





      Thanks @Aaron, text edited!

      – U3.1415926
      Mar 29 at 7:32











      2














      Looks like he's trying to pick you up on your grammar in retaliation. To me his response seems half serious, half ironic; so I would take it as such.






      share|improve this answer




























        2














        Looks like he's trying to pick you up on your grammar in retaliation. To me his response seems half serious, half ironic; so I would take it as such.






        share|improve this answer


























          2












          2








          2







          Looks like he's trying to pick you up on your grammar in retaliation. To me his response seems half serious, half ironic; so I would take it as such.






          share|improve this answer













          Looks like he's trying to pick you up on your grammar in retaliation. To me his response seems half serious, half ironic; so I would take it as such.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 28 at 11:17









          C26C26

          1,3881024




          1,3881024























              1














              The ONLY way I can see someone getting ticked at this is if you said "Prof" without a period showing an abbreviation, and that wouldn't be justified.



              "Dr. Octopus" is a perfectly formal address line. You would rarely see "Doctor Octopus". I think it borders on archaic use. "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period.



              "Doc Octopus", however, is very informal, probably too informal for some situations.



              Now, lets move to "Professor". "Prof." is a fine abbreviation, and maintains a level of formality. I'd say "Prof" is the same, with a slightly casual drop of a period, but suggest the person you're interacting with might be placing it in the "Doc" category.



              Of course, such things will differ by background. Take a peek at https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/71086/20457 regarding the use of "Herr Professor Doktor" and the lack of formality of dropping "Herr"



              All that said, perhaps this was just displaced annoyance, and the real issue was the letter pointing out typos in a book.






              share|improve this answer


























              • Thanks, @MontyHarder

                – Scott Seidman
                Mar 29 at 20:44











              • "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period": Note that in British English it's common to drop periods in abbreviations and initials (see e.g. Dr in the Oxford dictionary).

                – Massimo Ortolano
                Mar 29 at 22:41
















              1














              The ONLY way I can see someone getting ticked at this is if you said "Prof" without a period showing an abbreviation, and that wouldn't be justified.



              "Dr. Octopus" is a perfectly formal address line. You would rarely see "Doctor Octopus". I think it borders on archaic use. "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period.



              "Doc Octopus", however, is very informal, probably too informal for some situations.



              Now, lets move to "Professor". "Prof." is a fine abbreviation, and maintains a level of formality. I'd say "Prof" is the same, with a slightly casual drop of a period, but suggest the person you're interacting with might be placing it in the "Doc" category.



              Of course, such things will differ by background. Take a peek at https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/71086/20457 regarding the use of "Herr Professor Doktor" and the lack of formality of dropping "Herr"



              All that said, perhaps this was just displaced annoyance, and the real issue was the letter pointing out typos in a book.






              share|improve this answer


























              • Thanks, @MontyHarder

                – Scott Seidman
                Mar 29 at 20:44











              • "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period": Note that in British English it's common to drop periods in abbreviations and initials (see e.g. Dr in the Oxford dictionary).

                – Massimo Ortolano
                Mar 29 at 22:41














              1












              1








              1







              The ONLY way I can see someone getting ticked at this is if you said "Prof" without a period showing an abbreviation, and that wouldn't be justified.



              "Dr. Octopus" is a perfectly formal address line. You would rarely see "Doctor Octopus". I think it borders on archaic use. "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period.



              "Doc Octopus", however, is very informal, probably too informal for some situations.



              Now, lets move to "Professor". "Prof." is a fine abbreviation, and maintains a level of formality. I'd say "Prof" is the same, with a slightly casual drop of a period, but suggest the person you're interacting with might be placing it in the "Doc" category.



              Of course, such things will differ by background. Take a peek at https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/71086/20457 regarding the use of "Herr Professor Doktor" and the lack of formality of dropping "Herr"



              All that said, perhaps this was just displaced annoyance, and the real issue was the letter pointing out typos in a book.






              share|improve this answer















              The ONLY way I can see someone getting ticked at this is if you said "Prof" without a period showing an abbreviation, and that wouldn't be justified.



              "Dr. Octopus" is a perfectly formal address line. You would rarely see "Doctor Octopus". I think it borders on archaic use. "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period.



              "Doc Octopus", however, is very informal, probably too informal for some situations.



              Now, lets move to "Professor". "Prof." is a fine abbreviation, and maintains a level of formality. I'd say "Prof" is the same, with a slightly casual drop of a period, but suggest the person you're interacting with might be placing it in the "Doc" category.



              Of course, such things will differ by background. Take a peek at https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/71086/20457 regarding the use of "Herr Professor Doktor" and the lack of formality of dropping "Herr"



              All that said, perhaps this was just displaced annoyance, and the real issue was the letter pointing out typos in a book.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Mar 29 at 20:44

























              answered Mar 29 at 13:19









              Scott SeidmanScott Seidman

              15.1k33270




              15.1k33270













              • Thanks, @MontyHarder

                – Scott Seidman
                Mar 29 at 20:44











              • "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period": Note that in British English it's common to drop periods in abbreviations and initials (see e.g. Dr in the Oxford dictionary).

                – Massimo Ortolano
                Mar 29 at 22:41



















              • Thanks, @MontyHarder

                – Scott Seidman
                Mar 29 at 20:44











              • "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period": Note that in British English it's common to drop periods in abbreviations and initials (see e.g. Dr in the Oxford dictionary).

                – Massimo Ortolano
                Mar 29 at 22:41

















              Thanks, @MontyHarder

              – Scott Seidman
              Mar 29 at 20:44





              Thanks, @MontyHarder

              – Scott Seidman
              Mar 29 at 20:44













              "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period": Note that in British English it's common to drop periods in abbreviations and initials (see e.g. Dr in the Oxford dictionary).

              – Massimo Ortolano
              Mar 29 at 22:41





              "Dr Octopus" is just about the same as "Dr. Octopus", but someone has gotten just a tad casual about the period": Note that in British English it's common to drop periods in abbreviations and initials (see e.g. Dr in the Oxford dictionary).

              – Massimo Ortolano
              Mar 29 at 22:41











              0














              Although I find it very unusual the professor doesn't approve of you using the Prof. abbreviation, he is able to state his preference for how you address him. Some people are VERY particular and some people are highly functional despite having psychological problems. I think the key takeaway is that the professor clearly has a preference for how to be addressed and directly communicated that desire. I would advise you not to use the Prof. abbreviation with this professor, but feel free to use it for others, since it is generally accepted.



              As far as the reasoning the professor provided, it's complete BS. We abbreviate Mrs., Dr., Mr., PhD, etc. It's not customary to provide the full title.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                Although I find it very unusual the professor doesn't approve of you using the Prof. abbreviation, he is able to state his preference for how you address him. Some people are VERY particular and some people are highly functional despite having psychological problems. I think the key takeaway is that the professor clearly has a preference for how to be addressed and directly communicated that desire. I would advise you not to use the Prof. abbreviation with this professor, but feel free to use it for others, since it is generally accepted.



                As far as the reasoning the professor provided, it's complete BS. We abbreviate Mrs., Dr., Mr., PhD, etc. It's not customary to provide the full title.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Although I find it very unusual the professor doesn't approve of you using the Prof. abbreviation, he is able to state his preference for how you address him. Some people are VERY particular and some people are highly functional despite having psychological problems. I think the key takeaway is that the professor clearly has a preference for how to be addressed and directly communicated that desire. I would advise you not to use the Prof. abbreviation with this professor, but feel free to use it for others, since it is generally accepted.



                  As far as the reasoning the professor provided, it's complete BS. We abbreviate Mrs., Dr., Mr., PhD, etc. It's not customary to provide the full title.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Although I find it very unusual the professor doesn't approve of you using the Prof. abbreviation, he is able to state his preference for how you address him. Some people are VERY particular and some people are highly functional despite having psychological problems. I think the key takeaway is that the professor clearly has a preference for how to be addressed and directly communicated that desire. I would advise you not to use the Prof. abbreviation with this professor, but feel free to use it for others, since it is generally accepted.



                  As far as the reasoning the professor provided, it's complete BS. We abbreviate Mrs., Dr., Mr., PhD, etc. It's not customary to provide the full title.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 29 at 17:48









                  UnderminerUnderminer

                  1795




                  1795























                      -1















                      1. His reply is a little pompous, but he is correct that you should not abbreviate professor (within a salutation). Don't abbreviate senator either when writing to one.


                      2. I'm not sure that "chastise" is completely accurate. Maybe "correcting you" is kinder wording. Also, not sure why this is so important to you to come to Q&A site with wounds to show. It's not a big deal.


                      3. Since you are trying to get some help from the person, I suggest to drop YOUR woundedness AND ignore HIS pompousness and just soldier on and discuss the content.







                      share|improve this answer





















                      • 3





                        Not knowing proper etiquette and asking about it does make a good question. First and foremost because now I know if the situation ever arises for me.

                        – CramerTV
                        Mar 28 at 23:51








                      • 6





                        Could you provide a source for your first claim? I've been a professor for more than 20 years in the US and have never heard of a distinction between spelling out "Professor" and using the abbreviation "Prof."

                        – Ellen Spertus
                        Mar 29 at 2:30






                      • 1





                        (1) [citation needed]. (2) Who is wounded? Kinder wording would be that OP is probably wondering whether he should avoid using "Dear Prof. X" with other professors [and I see no reason why he should avoid the construction]. (3) Hard to say without the full context, but this snippet is so bizarre and hostile that I would carefully consider whether I wanted to pursue a relationship with this Prof. [sic] Millar further. This may be another reason why OP posted here.

                        – cag51
                        Mar 29 at 3:23


















                      -1















                      1. His reply is a little pompous, but he is correct that you should not abbreviate professor (within a salutation). Don't abbreviate senator either when writing to one.


                      2. I'm not sure that "chastise" is completely accurate. Maybe "correcting you" is kinder wording. Also, not sure why this is so important to you to come to Q&A site with wounds to show. It's not a big deal.


                      3. Since you are trying to get some help from the person, I suggest to drop YOUR woundedness AND ignore HIS pompousness and just soldier on and discuss the content.







                      share|improve this answer





















                      • 3





                        Not knowing proper etiquette and asking about it does make a good question. First and foremost because now I know if the situation ever arises for me.

                        – CramerTV
                        Mar 28 at 23:51








                      • 6





                        Could you provide a source for your first claim? I've been a professor for more than 20 years in the US and have never heard of a distinction between spelling out "Professor" and using the abbreviation "Prof."

                        – Ellen Spertus
                        Mar 29 at 2:30






                      • 1





                        (1) [citation needed]. (2) Who is wounded? Kinder wording would be that OP is probably wondering whether he should avoid using "Dear Prof. X" with other professors [and I see no reason why he should avoid the construction]. (3) Hard to say without the full context, but this snippet is so bizarre and hostile that I would carefully consider whether I wanted to pursue a relationship with this Prof. [sic] Millar further. This may be another reason why OP posted here.

                        – cag51
                        Mar 29 at 3:23
















                      -1












                      -1








                      -1








                      1. His reply is a little pompous, but he is correct that you should not abbreviate professor (within a salutation). Don't abbreviate senator either when writing to one.


                      2. I'm not sure that "chastise" is completely accurate. Maybe "correcting you" is kinder wording. Also, not sure why this is so important to you to come to Q&A site with wounds to show. It's not a big deal.


                      3. Since you are trying to get some help from the person, I suggest to drop YOUR woundedness AND ignore HIS pompousness and just soldier on and discuss the content.







                      share|improve this answer
















                      1. His reply is a little pompous, but he is correct that you should not abbreviate professor (within a salutation). Don't abbreviate senator either when writing to one.


                      2. I'm not sure that "chastise" is completely accurate. Maybe "correcting you" is kinder wording. Also, not sure why this is so important to you to come to Q&A site with wounds to show. It's not a big deal.


                      3. Since you are trying to get some help from the person, I suggest to drop YOUR woundedness AND ignore HIS pompousness and just soldier on and discuss the content.








                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Mar 28 at 17:45

























                      answered Mar 28 at 17:34









                      guestguest

                      2193




                      2193








                      • 3





                        Not knowing proper etiquette and asking about it does make a good question. First and foremost because now I know if the situation ever arises for me.

                        – CramerTV
                        Mar 28 at 23:51








                      • 6





                        Could you provide a source for your first claim? I've been a professor for more than 20 years in the US and have never heard of a distinction between spelling out "Professor" and using the abbreviation "Prof."

                        – Ellen Spertus
                        Mar 29 at 2:30






                      • 1





                        (1) [citation needed]. (2) Who is wounded? Kinder wording would be that OP is probably wondering whether he should avoid using "Dear Prof. X" with other professors [and I see no reason why he should avoid the construction]. (3) Hard to say without the full context, but this snippet is so bizarre and hostile that I would carefully consider whether I wanted to pursue a relationship with this Prof. [sic] Millar further. This may be another reason why OP posted here.

                        – cag51
                        Mar 29 at 3:23
















                      • 3





                        Not knowing proper etiquette and asking about it does make a good question. First and foremost because now I know if the situation ever arises for me.

                        – CramerTV
                        Mar 28 at 23:51








                      • 6





                        Could you provide a source for your first claim? I've been a professor for more than 20 years in the US and have never heard of a distinction between spelling out "Professor" and using the abbreviation "Prof."

                        – Ellen Spertus
                        Mar 29 at 2:30






                      • 1





                        (1) [citation needed]. (2) Who is wounded? Kinder wording would be that OP is probably wondering whether he should avoid using "Dear Prof. X" with other professors [and I see no reason why he should avoid the construction]. (3) Hard to say without the full context, but this snippet is so bizarre and hostile that I would carefully consider whether I wanted to pursue a relationship with this Prof. [sic] Millar further. This may be another reason why OP posted here.

                        – cag51
                        Mar 29 at 3:23










                      3




                      3





                      Not knowing proper etiquette and asking about it does make a good question. First and foremost because now I know if the situation ever arises for me.

                      – CramerTV
                      Mar 28 at 23:51







                      Not knowing proper etiquette and asking about it does make a good question. First and foremost because now I know if the situation ever arises for me.

                      – CramerTV
                      Mar 28 at 23:51






                      6




                      6





                      Could you provide a source for your first claim? I've been a professor for more than 20 years in the US and have never heard of a distinction between spelling out "Professor" and using the abbreviation "Prof."

                      – Ellen Spertus
                      Mar 29 at 2:30





                      Could you provide a source for your first claim? I've been a professor for more than 20 years in the US and have never heard of a distinction between spelling out "Professor" and using the abbreviation "Prof."

                      – Ellen Spertus
                      Mar 29 at 2:30




                      1




                      1





                      (1) [citation needed]. (2) Who is wounded? Kinder wording would be that OP is probably wondering whether he should avoid using "Dear Prof. X" with other professors [and I see no reason why he should avoid the construction]. (3) Hard to say without the full context, but this snippet is so bizarre and hostile that I would carefully consider whether I wanted to pursue a relationship with this Prof. [sic] Millar further. This may be another reason why OP posted here.

                      – cag51
                      Mar 29 at 3:23







                      (1) [citation needed]. (2) Who is wounded? Kinder wording would be that OP is probably wondering whether he should avoid using "Dear Prof. X" with other professors [and I see no reason why he should avoid the construction]. (3) Hard to say without the full context, but this snippet is so bizarre and hostile that I would carefully consider whether I wanted to pursue a relationship with this Prof. [sic] Millar further. This may be another reason why OP posted here.

                      – cag51
                      Mar 29 at 3:23







                      protected by StrongBad Mar 28 at 17:32



                      Thank you for your interest in this question.
                      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                      Alcedinidae

                      RAC Tourist Trophy