Why are Vedas regarded as Apauresheya (authorless/ not created by anyone)?












3














Why are Vedas regarded as Apauresheya (authorless/ not created by anyone)?



Is it a sin to consider that Veda was written by someone as propagated by western scholars?






vedas sin







share|improve this question
























  • Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
    – Rickross
    2 days ago










  • Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
    – Akshay S
    2 days ago










  • is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago










  • @Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
    – subash rajaa
    2 days ago


















3














Why are Vedas regarded as Apauresheya (authorless/ not created by anyone)?



Is it a sin to consider that Veda was written by someone as propagated by western scholars?






vedas sin







share|improve this question
























  • Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
    – Rickross
    2 days ago










  • Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
    – Akshay S
    2 days ago










  • is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago










  • @Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
    – subash rajaa
    2 days ago
















3












3








3







Why are Vedas regarded as Apauresheya (authorless/ not created by anyone)?



Is it a sin to consider that Veda was written by someone as propagated by western scholars?






vedas sin







share|improve this question















Why are Vedas regarded as Apauresheya (authorless/ not created by anyone)?



Is it a sin to consider that Veda was written by someone as propagated by western scholars?






vedas sin




vedas sin






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Rickross

47.8k371178




47.8k371178










asked 2 days ago









prasanna ragothaman

1146




1146












  • Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
    – Rickross
    2 days ago










  • Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
    – Akshay S
    2 days ago










  • is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago










  • @Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
    – subash rajaa
    2 days ago




















  • Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
    – Rickross
    2 days ago










  • Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
    – Akshay S
    2 days ago










  • is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago










  • @Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
    – subash rajaa
    2 days ago


















Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
– Rickross
2 days ago




Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
– Rickross
2 days ago












Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
– Akshay S
2 days ago




Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
– Akshay S
2 days ago












is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
– prasanna ragothaman
2 days ago




is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
– prasanna ragothaman
2 days ago












@Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
– prasanna ragothaman
2 days ago




@Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
– prasanna ragothaman
2 days ago




2




2




@prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
– subash rajaa
2 days ago






@prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
– subash rajaa
2 days ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














As per Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, not just Vedas but all our scriptures are the breath of the supreme being.



Yajnavalkya Maharaja tells Maitreyi Devi,




As from a fire kindled with wet fuel various kinds of smoke issue forth, even so, my dear, the Rig—Veda, the Yajur—Veda, the Sama—Veda, the Atharvangirasa, history (itihasa), ancient transmissions (purana), the arts (vidya), the Upanishads, verses (slokas), aphorisms (sutras), elucidations (anuvyakhyanas) and explanations (vyakhyanas) are like the breath of this infinite Reality. From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth.




The logic is just like a breath of a person is coexistent with a person, the Vedas are coexistent with Ishvara and not created at any point.






share|improve this answer































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    As per Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, not just Vedas but all our scriptures are the breath of the supreme being.



    Yajnavalkya Maharaja tells Maitreyi Devi,




    As from a fire kindled with wet fuel various kinds of smoke issue forth, even so, my dear, the Rig—Veda, the Yajur—Veda, the Sama—Veda, the Atharvangirasa, history (itihasa), ancient transmissions (purana), the arts (vidya), the Upanishads, verses (slokas), aphorisms (sutras), elucidations (anuvyakhyanas) and explanations (vyakhyanas) are like the breath of this infinite Reality. From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth.




    The logic is just like a breath of a person is coexistent with a person, the Vedas are coexistent with Ishvara and not created at any point.






    share|improve this answer




























      5














      As per Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, not just Vedas but all our scriptures are the breath of the supreme being.



      Yajnavalkya Maharaja tells Maitreyi Devi,




      As from a fire kindled with wet fuel various kinds of smoke issue forth, even so, my dear, the Rig—Veda, the Yajur—Veda, the Sama—Veda, the Atharvangirasa, history (itihasa), ancient transmissions (purana), the arts (vidya), the Upanishads, verses (slokas), aphorisms (sutras), elucidations (anuvyakhyanas) and explanations (vyakhyanas) are like the breath of this infinite Reality. From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth.




      The logic is just like a breath of a person is coexistent with a person, the Vedas are coexistent with Ishvara and not created at any point.






      share|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5






        As per Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, not just Vedas but all our scriptures are the breath of the supreme being.



        Yajnavalkya Maharaja tells Maitreyi Devi,




        As from a fire kindled with wet fuel various kinds of smoke issue forth, even so, my dear, the Rig—Veda, the Yajur—Veda, the Sama—Veda, the Atharvangirasa, history (itihasa), ancient transmissions (purana), the arts (vidya), the Upanishads, verses (slokas), aphorisms (sutras), elucidations (anuvyakhyanas) and explanations (vyakhyanas) are like the breath of this infinite Reality. From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth.




        The logic is just like a breath of a person is coexistent with a person, the Vedas are coexistent with Ishvara and not created at any point.






        share|improve this answer














        As per Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, not just Vedas but all our scriptures are the breath of the supreme being.



        Yajnavalkya Maharaja tells Maitreyi Devi,




        As from a fire kindled with wet fuel various kinds of smoke issue forth, even so, my dear, the Rig—Veda, the Yajur—Veda, the Sama—Veda, the Atharvangirasa, history (itihasa), ancient transmissions (purana), the arts (vidya), the Upanishads, verses (slokas), aphorisms (sutras), elucidations (anuvyakhyanas) and explanations (vyakhyanas) are like the breath of this infinite Reality. From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth.




        The logic is just like a breath of a person is coexistent with a person, the Vedas are coexistent with Ishvara and not created at any point.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago

























        answered 2 days ago









        subash rajaa

        67945




        67945















            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 total noob sorry any help greatly appreciated. I keep getting this "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'." heres my codes code one CREATE TABLE supplier ( supplierID INT PRIMARY KEY, ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), price DECIMAL (5,2), ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); code two CREATE TABLE orders ( orderID INT PRIMARY KEY, customerID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES customer(customerID), ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), orderDate date, ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); Ive run out of stuff to try other than dumbing it down to uselessness. ...
            Read more

            Alcedinidae

            Image
            Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout ...
            Read more

            Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 17 1 Today, I found myself discussing what students should have "under their belts" during a lecture, and I wondered to myself if there was some inappropriate undertone here that I might be unaware of. Question : What is the origin of the phrase "under your belt"? A google search revealed some webpages (e.g. [1]) that assert its origin is related to consumption of food -- once a meal has been eaten, it's under your belt (which is a relief). However, with such websites, I have no way to determine fact from "random guy on the internet making stuff up". etymology idioms ...
            Read more