Why are Vedas regarded as Apauresheya (authorless/ not created by anyone)?












3














Why are Vedas regarded as Apauresheya (authorless/ not created by anyone)?



Is it a sin to consider that Veda was written by someone as propagated by western scholars?






vedas sin







share|improve this question
























  • Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
    – Rickross
    2 days ago










  • Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
    – Akshay S
    2 days ago










  • is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago










  • @Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
    – subash rajaa
    2 days ago


















3














Why are Vedas regarded as Apauresheya (authorless/ not created by anyone)?



Is it a sin to consider that Veda was written by someone as propagated by western scholars?






vedas sin







share|improve this question
























  • Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
    – Rickross
    2 days ago










  • Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
    – Akshay S
    2 days ago










  • is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago










  • @Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
    – subash rajaa
    2 days ago
















3












3








3







Why are Vedas regarded as Apauresheya (authorless/ not created by anyone)?



Is it a sin to consider that Veda was written by someone as propagated by western scholars?






vedas sin







share|improve this question















Why are Vedas regarded as Apauresheya (authorless/ not created by anyone)?



Is it a sin to consider that Veda was written by someone as propagated by western scholars?






vedas sin




vedas sin






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Rickross

47.8k371178




47.8k371178










asked 2 days ago









prasanna ragothaman

1146




1146












  • Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
    – Rickross
    2 days ago










  • Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
    – Akshay S
    2 days ago










  • is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago










  • @Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
    – subash rajaa
    2 days ago




















  • Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
    – Rickross
    2 days ago










  • Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
    – Akshay S
    2 days ago










  • is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago










  • @Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
    – prasanna ragothaman
    2 days ago






  • 2




    @prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
    – subash rajaa
    2 days ago


















Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
– Rickross
2 days ago




Related or Duplicate: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17831/…
– Rickross
2 days ago












Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
– Akshay S
2 days ago




Vedas were given to Rishis by isvara who did intense tapasya.
– Akshay S
2 days ago












is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
– prasanna ragothaman
2 days ago




is it a sin to consider or belive that veda created by someone because in some of the question there were answer regarding assining of dates for vedic scriptures
– prasanna ragothaman
2 days ago












@Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
– prasanna ragothaman
2 days ago




@Rickross i think its duplicate may be delete
– prasanna ragothaman
2 days ago




2




2




@prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
– subash rajaa
2 days ago






@prasanna, what is sin? Sin is that which is against Dharma, and Dharma is what is outlined by Hari the essence of which is in our scriptures. Ultimately Hari decides what is sin based on his own judgment. Scriptures are guiding principles but they are not hard rocks. The judge always considers the situations. This is my opinion.
– subash rajaa
2 days ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














As per Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, not just Vedas but all our scriptures are the breath of the supreme being.



Yajnavalkya Maharaja tells Maitreyi Devi,




As from a fire kindled with wet fuel various kinds of smoke issue forth, even so, my dear, the Rig—Veda, the Yajur—Veda, the Sama—Veda, the Atharvangirasa, history (itihasa), ancient transmissions (purana), the arts (vidya), the Upanishads, verses (slokas), aphorisms (sutras), elucidations (anuvyakhyanas) and explanations (vyakhyanas) are like the breath of this infinite Reality. From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth.




The logic is just like a breath of a person is coexistent with a person, the Vedas are coexistent with Ishvara and not created at any point.






share|improve this answer































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    As per Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, not just Vedas but all our scriptures are the breath of the supreme being.



    Yajnavalkya Maharaja tells Maitreyi Devi,




    As from a fire kindled with wet fuel various kinds of smoke issue forth, even so, my dear, the Rig—Veda, the Yajur—Veda, the Sama—Veda, the Atharvangirasa, history (itihasa), ancient transmissions (purana), the arts (vidya), the Upanishads, verses (slokas), aphorisms (sutras), elucidations (anuvyakhyanas) and explanations (vyakhyanas) are like the breath of this infinite Reality. From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth.




    The logic is just like a breath of a person is coexistent with a person, the Vedas are coexistent with Ishvara and not created at any point.






    share|improve this answer




























      5














      As per Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, not just Vedas but all our scriptures are the breath of the supreme being.



      Yajnavalkya Maharaja tells Maitreyi Devi,




      As from a fire kindled with wet fuel various kinds of smoke issue forth, even so, my dear, the Rig—Veda, the Yajur—Veda, the Sama—Veda, the Atharvangirasa, history (itihasa), ancient transmissions (purana), the arts (vidya), the Upanishads, verses (slokas), aphorisms (sutras), elucidations (anuvyakhyanas) and explanations (vyakhyanas) are like the breath of this infinite Reality. From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth.




      The logic is just like a breath of a person is coexistent with a person, the Vedas are coexistent with Ishvara and not created at any point.






      share|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5






        As per Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, not just Vedas but all our scriptures are the breath of the supreme being.



        Yajnavalkya Maharaja tells Maitreyi Devi,




        As from a fire kindled with wet fuel various kinds of smoke issue forth, even so, my dear, the Rig—Veda, the Yajur—Veda, the Sama—Veda, the Atharvangirasa, history (itihasa), ancient transmissions (purana), the arts (vidya), the Upanishads, verses (slokas), aphorisms (sutras), elucidations (anuvyakhyanas) and explanations (vyakhyanas) are like the breath of this infinite Reality. From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth.




        The logic is just like a breath of a person is coexistent with a person, the Vedas are coexistent with Ishvara and not created at any point.






        share|improve this answer














        As per Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, not just Vedas but all our scriptures are the breath of the supreme being.



        Yajnavalkya Maharaja tells Maitreyi Devi,




        As from a fire kindled with wet fuel various kinds of smoke issue forth, even so, my dear, the Rig—Veda, the Yajur—Veda, the Sama—Veda, the Atharvangirasa, history (itihasa), ancient transmissions (purana), the arts (vidya), the Upanishads, verses (slokas), aphorisms (sutras), elucidations (anuvyakhyanas) and explanations (vyakhyanas) are like the breath of this infinite Reality. From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth.




        The logic is just like a breath of a person is coexistent with a person, the Vedas are coexistent with Ishvara and not created at any point.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago

























        answered 2 days ago









        subash rajaa

        67945




        67945















            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Image
            5 This question already has an answer here: How do you calculate the likelihood of drawing certain cards in your opening hand? 3 answers There is a funny modern deck where you play Treasure Hunt, but you really need to have it on the starting hand. How many mulligans should I take, if my deck contains 60 cards and contains 4 copies of Treasure Hunt? magic-the-gathering probability share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:12 dan dan 152 4
            Read more

            Alcedinidae

            Image
            Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
            Read more

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]

            Image
            9 $begingroup$ This question already has an answer here: What happens if we put together a proton and an antineutron? 2 answers Is it theoretically possible to make a "deuterium" atom containing a proton and an antineutron in its nucleus? Would the strong nuclear force cause attraction between a proton and an antineutron? Would such a nucleus be stable, or would the proton somehow annihilate the antineutron when close enough? nuclear-physics antimatter share | cite | improve this question asked yesterday
            Read more