I am looking for a word in English that means something specific about the immediate present
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm doing research on manufacturing systems and throughout my papers I need to refer to events as they approach a line t=0 which is, to within a differential slice of time, the exact present between future and past, the dissecting line. Such a word would have quantum physicists turn in their graves due to relativity I know, but I think what it means is clear enough for English.
I've read that origo may mean what I want. It seems strange that such a word doesn't exist, and I've searched for weeks. I know the word 'now' sort of means that but it's ambiguous and still represents a spacious present.
single-word-requests time present-tense
New contributor
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm doing research on manufacturing systems and throughout my papers I need to refer to events as they approach a line t=0 which is, to within a differential slice of time, the exact present between future and past, the dissecting line. Such a word would have quantum physicists turn in their graves due to relativity I know, but I think what it means is clear enough for English.
I've read that origo may mean what I want. It seems strange that such a word doesn't exist, and I've searched for weeks. I know the word 'now' sort of means that but it's ambiguous and still represents a spacious present.
single-word-requests time present-tense
New contributor
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The only word i can think of is the "Origin" in a Cartesian Coordinate System
– Uhtred Ragnarsson
2 days ago
1
Origin sounds strange to me, but I'm not used to thinking of it in terms of mathematics. I'm not sure if you need something specific to that domain or not. What do you mean when you say that now is ambiguous and you mention a "spacious present"? As far as I know, now is very precise. The only problem with it is our inability to grasp it intuitively—because as soon as it is now, it no longer is. (But I'm not sure if that's what you're talking about or if our inability to fully intuit it invalidates the word. Any word or label would have the same issue.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
@Chappo "t=0" is a common enough concept.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Kris t=0 represents a single point in a time series. The OP is asking for something far more nuanced: an expression for t=0 within a time function that is constantly resetting.
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Chappo See my answer.
– Kris
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm doing research on manufacturing systems and throughout my papers I need to refer to events as they approach a line t=0 which is, to within a differential slice of time, the exact present between future and past, the dissecting line. Such a word would have quantum physicists turn in their graves due to relativity I know, but I think what it means is clear enough for English.
I've read that origo may mean what I want. It seems strange that such a word doesn't exist, and I've searched for weeks. I know the word 'now' sort of means that but it's ambiguous and still represents a spacious present.
single-word-requests time present-tense
New contributor
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm doing research on manufacturing systems and throughout my papers I need to refer to events as they approach a line t=0 which is, to within a differential slice of time, the exact present between future and past, the dissecting line. Such a word would have quantum physicists turn in their graves due to relativity I know, but I think what it means is clear enough for English.
I've read that origo may mean what I want. It seems strange that such a word doesn't exist, and I've searched for weeks. I know the word 'now' sort of means that but it's ambiguous and still represents a spacious present.
single-word-requests time present-tense
single-word-requests time present-tense
New contributor
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 21 hours ago
alwayslearning
25.3k53592
25.3k53592
New contributor
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Dale Sparrow
42
42
New contributor
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The only word i can think of is the "Origin" in a Cartesian Coordinate System
– Uhtred Ragnarsson
2 days ago
1
Origin sounds strange to me, but I'm not used to thinking of it in terms of mathematics. I'm not sure if you need something specific to that domain or not. What do you mean when you say that now is ambiguous and you mention a "spacious present"? As far as I know, now is very precise. The only problem with it is our inability to grasp it intuitively—because as soon as it is now, it no longer is. (But I'm not sure if that's what you're talking about or if our inability to fully intuit it invalidates the word. Any word or label would have the same issue.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
@Chappo "t=0" is a common enough concept.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Kris t=0 represents a single point in a time series. The OP is asking for something far more nuanced: an expression for t=0 within a time function that is constantly resetting.
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Chappo See my answer.
– Kris
2 days ago
add a comment |
The only word i can think of is the "Origin" in a Cartesian Coordinate System
– Uhtred Ragnarsson
2 days ago
1
Origin sounds strange to me, but I'm not used to thinking of it in terms of mathematics. I'm not sure if you need something specific to that domain or not. What do you mean when you say that now is ambiguous and you mention a "spacious present"? As far as I know, now is very precise. The only problem with it is our inability to grasp it intuitively—because as soon as it is now, it no longer is. (But I'm not sure if that's what you're talking about or if our inability to fully intuit it invalidates the word. Any word or label would have the same issue.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
@Chappo "t=0" is a common enough concept.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Kris t=0 represents a single point in a time series. The OP is asking for something far more nuanced: an expression for t=0 within a time function that is constantly resetting.
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Chappo See my answer.
– Kris
2 days ago
The only word i can think of is the "Origin" in a Cartesian Coordinate System
– Uhtred Ragnarsson
2 days ago
The only word i can think of is the "Origin" in a Cartesian Coordinate System
– Uhtred Ragnarsson
2 days ago
1
1
Origin sounds strange to me, but I'm not used to thinking of it in terms of mathematics. I'm not sure if you need something specific to that domain or not. What do you mean when you say that now is ambiguous and you mention a "spacious present"? As far as I know, now is very precise. The only problem with it is our inability to grasp it intuitively—because as soon as it is now, it no longer is. (But I'm not sure if that's what you're talking about or if our inability to fully intuit it invalidates the word. Any word or label would have the same issue.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
Origin sounds strange to me, but I'm not used to thinking of it in terms of mathematics. I'm not sure if you need something specific to that domain or not. What do you mean when you say that now is ambiguous and you mention a "spacious present"? As far as I know, now is very precise. The only problem with it is our inability to grasp it intuitively—because as soon as it is now, it no longer is. (But I'm not sure if that's what you're talking about or if our inability to fully intuit it invalidates the word. Any word or label would have the same issue.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
@Chappo "t=0" is a common enough concept.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Chappo "t=0" is a common enough concept.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Kris t=0 represents a single point in a time series. The OP is asking for something far more nuanced: an expression for t=0 within a time function that is constantly resetting.
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Kris t=0 represents a single point in a time series. The OP is asking for something far more nuanced: an expression for t=0 within a time function that is constantly resetting.
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Chappo See my answer.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Chappo See my answer.
– Kris
2 days ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
In common everyday life there's been little need for an expression of the immediate (and constantly becoming past) instant of now, given that the moment it's expressed, that time-point has already ceased to be "now": it's become "just a moment ago" . The word that comes closest to expressing this concept is:
instantaneous
- done, occurring, or acting without any perceptible duration of time
- death was instantaneous
- done without any delay being purposely introduced
- took instantaneous corrective action
- occurring or present at a particular instant
instantaneous velocity
[Merriam-Webster Dictionary]
While I think all three definitions have relevance, the third definition would appear to be the most apt. An alternative source provides a similar definition:
- [Physics]
Existing or measured at a particular instant.
- ‘measurement of the instantaneous velocity’
[Oxford Living Dictionaries]
Example sentence in the context of this question:
This metric analyses the instantaneous value of the parameter.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
current
1 Belonging to the present time; happening or being used or done now.
A typical sentence might look like:
The equation is based on the current instantaneous value of the parameter (as at the time of measurement).
Your word “current” is redundant given the words “instantaneous” and “as at the time of measurement”, and without these qualifications it is as imprecise as “present”. Perhaps instantaneous on its own might be the word the OP is looking for?
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Chappo Current and instantaneous are independent and refer to different things. No confusion.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Chappo Current without instantaneous could belong to timeslice (t-n to t+n) where t=0; it doesn't necessarily mean at t=0.
– Kris
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
What about word beginning. Or you could add your own explanation/definition in the introduction part of your paper. For example: throughout this paper, I will refer to /your definition/ as initiation point/origo/origin/or something. Then you can always add note*(asterisk) with reference to definition, whenever this word appears in the text.
New contributor
Kacper Perun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
In common everyday life there's been little need for an expression of the immediate (and constantly becoming past) instant of now, given that the moment it's expressed, that time-point has already ceased to be "now": it's become "just a moment ago" . The word that comes closest to expressing this concept is:
instantaneous
- done, occurring, or acting without any perceptible duration of time
- death was instantaneous
- done without any delay being purposely introduced
- took instantaneous corrective action
- occurring or present at a particular instant
instantaneous velocity
[Merriam-Webster Dictionary]
While I think all three definitions have relevance, the third definition would appear to be the most apt. An alternative source provides a similar definition:
- [Physics]
Existing or measured at a particular instant.
- ‘measurement of the instantaneous velocity’
[Oxford Living Dictionaries]
Example sentence in the context of this question:
This metric analyses the instantaneous value of the parameter.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
In common everyday life there's been little need for an expression of the immediate (and constantly becoming past) instant of now, given that the moment it's expressed, that time-point has already ceased to be "now": it's become "just a moment ago" . The word that comes closest to expressing this concept is:
instantaneous
- done, occurring, or acting without any perceptible duration of time
- death was instantaneous
- done without any delay being purposely introduced
- took instantaneous corrective action
- occurring or present at a particular instant
instantaneous velocity
[Merriam-Webster Dictionary]
While I think all three definitions have relevance, the third definition would appear to be the most apt. An alternative source provides a similar definition:
- [Physics]
Existing or measured at a particular instant.
- ‘measurement of the instantaneous velocity’
[Oxford Living Dictionaries]
Example sentence in the context of this question:
This metric analyses the instantaneous value of the parameter.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
In common everyday life there's been little need for an expression of the immediate (and constantly becoming past) instant of now, given that the moment it's expressed, that time-point has already ceased to be "now": it's become "just a moment ago" . The word that comes closest to expressing this concept is:
instantaneous
- done, occurring, or acting without any perceptible duration of time
- death was instantaneous
- done without any delay being purposely introduced
- took instantaneous corrective action
- occurring or present at a particular instant
instantaneous velocity
[Merriam-Webster Dictionary]
While I think all three definitions have relevance, the third definition would appear to be the most apt. An alternative source provides a similar definition:
- [Physics]
Existing or measured at a particular instant.
- ‘measurement of the instantaneous velocity’
[Oxford Living Dictionaries]
Example sentence in the context of this question:
This metric analyses the instantaneous value of the parameter.
In common everyday life there's been little need for an expression of the immediate (and constantly becoming past) instant of now, given that the moment it's expressed, that time-point has already ceased to be "now": it's become "just a moment ago" . The word that comes closest to expressing this concept is:
instantaneous
- done, occurring, or acting without any perceptible duration of time
- death was instantaneous
- done without any delay being purposely introduced
- took instantaneous corrective action
- occurring or present at a particular instant
instantaneous velocity
[Merriam-Webster Dictionary]
While I think all three definitions have relevance, the third definition would appear to be the most apt. An alternative source provides a similar definition:
- [Physics]
Existing or measured at a particular instant.
- ‘measurement of the instantaneous velocity’
[Oxford Living Dictionaries]
Example sentence in the context of this question:
This metric analyses the instantaneous value of the parameter.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Chappo
2,38931224
2,38931224
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
current
1 Belonging to the present time; happening or being used or done now.
A typical sentence might look like:
The equation is based on the current instantaneous value of the parameter (as at the time of measurement).
Your word “current” is redundant given the words “instantaneous” and “as at the time of measurement”, and without these qualifications it is as imprecise as “present”. Perhaps instantaneous on its own might be the word the OP is looking for?
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Chappo Current and instantaneous are independent and refer to different things. No confusion.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Chappo Current without instantaneous could belong to timeslice (t-n to t+n) where t=0; it doesn't necessarily mean at t=0.
– Kris
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
current
1 Belonging to the present time; happening or being used or done now.
A typical sentence might look like:
The equation is based on the current instantaneous value of the parameter (as at the time of measurement).
Your word “current” is redundant given the words “instantaneous” and “as at the time of measurement”, and without these qualifications it is as imprecise as “present”. Perhaps instantaneous on its own might be the word the OP is looking for?
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Chappo Current and instantaneous are independent and refer to different things. No confusion.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Chappo Current without instantaneous could belong to timeslice (t-n to t+n) where t=0; it doesn't necessarily mean at t=0.
– Kris
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
current
1 Belonging to the present time; happening or being used or done now.
A typical sentence might look like:
The equation is based on the current instantaneous value of the parameter (as at the time of measurement).
current
1 Belonging to the present time; happening or being used or done now.
A typical sentence might look like:
The equation is based on the current instantaneous value of the parameter (as at the time of measurement).
answered 2 days ago
Kris
32.3k541116
32.3k541116
Your word “current” is redundant given the words “instantaneous” and “as at the time of measurement”, and without these qualifications it is as imprecise as “present”. Perhaps instantaneous on its own might be the word the OP is looking for?
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Chappo Current and instantaneous are independent and refer to different things. No confusion.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Chappo Current without instantaneous could belong to timeslice (t-n to t+n) where t=0; it doesn't necessarily mean at t=0.
– Kris
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your word “current” is redundant given the words “instantaneous” and “as at the time of measurement”, and without these qualifications it is as imprecise as “present”. Perhaps instantaneous on its own might be the word the OP is looking for?
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Chappo Current and instantaneous are independent and refer to different things. No confusion.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Chappo Current without instantaneous could belong to timeslice (t-n to t+n) where t=0; it doesn't necessarily mean at t=0.
– Kris
2 days ago
Your word “current” is redundant given the words “instantaneous” and “as at the time of measurement”, and without these qualifications it is as imprecise as “present”. Perhaps instantaneous on its own might be the word the OP is looking for?
– Chappo
2 days ago
Your word “current” is redundant given the words “instantaneous” and “as at the time of measurement”, and without these qualifications it is as imprecise as “present”. Perhaps instantaneous on its own might be the word the OP is looking for?
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Chappo Current and instantaneous are independent and refer to different things. No confusion.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Chappo Current and instantaneous are independent and refer to different things. No confusion.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Chappo Current without instantaneous could belong to timeslice (t-n to t+n) where t=0; it doesn't necessarily mean at t=0.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Chappo Current without instantaneous could belong to timeslice (t-n to t+n) where t=0; it doesn't necessarily mean at t=0.
– Kris
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
What about word beginning. Or you could add your own explanation/definition in the introduction part of your paper. For example: throughout this paper, I will refer to /your definition/ as initiation point/origo/origin/or something. Then you can always add note*(asterisk) with reference to definition, whenever this word appears in the text.
New contributor
Kacper Perun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
What about word beginning. Or you could add your own explanation/definition in the introduction part of your paper. For example: throughout this paper, I will refer to /your definition/ as initiation point/origo/origin/or something. Then you can always add note*(asterisk) with reference to definition, whenever this word appears in the text.
New contributor
Kacper Perun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
up vote
-2
down vote
What about word beginning. Or you could add your own explanation/definition in the introduction part of your paper. For example: throughout this paper, I will refer to /your definition/ as initiation point/origo/origin/or something. Then you can always add note*(asterisk) with reference to definition, whenever this word appears in the text.
New contributor
Kacper Perun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
What about word beginning. Or you could add your own explanation/definition in the introduction part of your paper. For example: throughout this paper, I will refer to /your definition/ as initiation point/origo/origin/or something. Then you can always add note*(asterisk) with reference to definition, whenever this word appears in the text.
New contributor
Kacper Perun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Kacper Perun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 days ago
Kacper Perun
11
11
New contributor
Kacper Perun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Kacper Perun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Kacper Perun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dale Sparrow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474187%2fi-am-looking-for-a-word-in-english-that-means-something-specific-about-the-immed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The only word i can think of is the "Origin" in a Cartesian Coordinate System
– Uhtred Ragnarsson
2 days ago
1
Origin sounds strange to me, but I'm not used to thinking of it in terms of mathematics. I'm not sure if you need something specific to that domain or not. What do you mean when you say that now is ambiguous and you mention a "spacious present"? As far as I know, now is very precise. The only problem with it is our inability to grasp it intuitively—because as soon as it is now, it no longer is. (But I'm not sure if that's what you're talking about or if our inability to fully intuit it invalidates the word. Any word or label would have the same issue.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
@Chappo "t=0" is a common enough concept.
– Kris
2 days ago
@Kris t=0 represents a single point in a time series. The OP is asking for something far more nuanced: an expression for t=0 within a time function that is constantly resetting.
– Chappo
2 days ago
@Chappo See my answer.
– Kris
2 days ago