Making diagrams
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I'm interested in making a type diagram:
I have the following commands:
begin{equation*}
xymatrix@C+1em@R+1em{
A ar[r]^-{f} ar[d]_-{g} & B \
C ar[ur]_-{h}}
end{equation*}
Who provided me with:
What should I change to do the first diagram?
Thanks
diagrams
edited yesterday
Sigur
23k353134
asked yesterday
Manoel
1434
New contributor
Manoel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I'm interested in making a type diagram:
I have the following commands:
begin{equation*}
xymatrix@C+1em@R+1em{
A ar[r]^-{f} ar[d]_-{g} & B \
C ar[ur]_-{h}}
end{equation*}
Who provided me with:
What should I change to do the first diagram?
Thanks
diagrams
edited yesterday
Sigur
23k353134
asked yesterday
Manoel
1434
New contributor
Manoel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.Cshould be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.
– Sigur
yesterday
1
Why not usetikz-cd?
– murray
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I'm interested in making a type diagram:
I have the following commands:
begin{equation*}
xymatrix@C+1em@R+1em{
A ar[r]^-{f} ar[d]_-{g} & B \
C ar[ur]_-{h}}
end{equation*}
Who provided me with:
What should I change to do the first diagram?
Thanks
diagrams
edited yesterday
Sigur
23k353134
asked yesterday
Manoel
1434
New contributor
Manoel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm interested in making a type diagram:
I have the following commands:
begin{equation*}
xymatrix@C+1em@R+1em{
A ar[r]^-{f} ar[d]_-{g} & B \
C ar[ur]_-{h}}
end{equation*}
Who provided me with:
What should I change to do the first diagram?
Thanks
diagrams
diagrams
edited yesterday
Sigur
23k353134
asked yesterday
Manoel
1434
New contributor
Manoel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
Sigur
23k353134
asked yesterday
Manoel
1434
New contributor
Manoel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
Sigur
23k353134
edited yesterday
Sigur
23k353134
edited yesterday
Sigur
23k353134
23k353134
asked yesterday
Manoel
1434
New contributor
Manoel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
Manoel
1434
asked yesterday
Manoel
1434
1434
New contributor
Manoel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Manoel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Manoel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.Cshould be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.
– Sigur
yesterday
1
Why not usetikz-cd?
– murray
yesterday
add a comment |
3
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.Cshould be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.
– Sigur
yesterday
1
Why not usetikz-cd?
– murray
yesterday
3
3
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.
C should be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.– Sigur
yesterday
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.
C should be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.– Sigur
yesterday
1
1
Why not use
tikz-cd?– murray
yesterday
Why not use
tikz-cd?– murray
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
Welcome to TeX.SE! If you are not insisting on xymatrix, you could try
documentclass{amsart}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
[
begin{tikzcd}[row sep=4em]
A arrow[rr, "f"] arrow[rd, "g"swap]& & B\
& C arrow[ur, "h"swap] &
end{tikzcd}
]
end{document}
EDIT: switched to relativistic ;-) units, big thanks to @egreg.
answered yesterday
marmot
75.7k486160
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
yesterday
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
yesterday
1
I suggest using relative units such asemorex.
– egreg
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
Using the xymatrix package you can see an example of little guide for this package: https://www.jmilne.org/not/Mxymatrix.pdf. I have created with this package, for your request, a simple code.
Picture with equilateral triangle.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix@C-=0.5cm{
A
ar@{->}[rr]^f ar@{->}[rd]_g & & B ar@{<-}[ld]^h\
&C&\
&&
}
end{document}
answered 13 hours ago
Sebastiano
8,29541754
1
It is not necessary to use@{->}since it is the standard arrow style.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow fromBtoCwith reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts fromC.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
2
I don't know the difference between@Cand@C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is@Ralso.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
Welcome to TeX.SE! If you are not insisting on xymatrix, you could try
documentclass{amsart}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
[
begin{tikzcd}[row sep=4em]
A arrow[rr, "f"] arrow[rd, "g"swap]& & B\
& C arrow[ur, "h"swap] &
end{tikzcd}
]
end{document}
EDIT: switched to relativistic ;-) units, big thanks to @egreg.
answered yesterday
marmot
75.7k486160
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
yesterday
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
yesterday
1
I suggest using relative units such asemorex.
– egreg
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
Welcome to TeX.SE! If you are not insisting on xymatrix, you could try
documentclass{amsart}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
[
begin{tikzcd}[row sep=4em]
A arrow[rr, "f"] arrow[rd, "g"swap]& & B\
& C arrow[ur, "h"swap] &
end{tikzcd}
]
end{document}
EDIT: switched to relativistic ;-) units, big thanks to @egreg.
answered yesterday
marmot
75.7k486160
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
yesterday
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
yesterday
1
I suggest using relative units such asemorex.
– egreg
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
Welcome to TeX.SE! If you are not insisting on xymatrix, you could try
documentclass{amsart}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
[
begin{tikzcd}[row sep=4em]
A arrow[rr, "f"] arrow[rd, "g"swap]& & B\
& C arrow[ur, "h"swap] &
end{tikzcd}
]
end{document}
EDIT: switched to relativistic ;-) units, big thanks to @egreg.
answered yesterday
marmot
75.7k486160
Welcome to TeX.SE! If you are not insisting on xymatrix, you could try
documentclass{amsart}
usepackage{tikz-cd}
begin{document}
[
begin{tikzcd}[row sep=4em]
A arrow[rr, "f"] arrow[rd, "g"swap]& & B\
& C arrow[ur, "h"swap] &
end{tikzcd}
]
end{document}
EDIT: switched to relativistic ;-) units, big thanks to @egreg.
answered yesterday
marmot
75.7k486160
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
marmot
75.7k486160
answered yesterday
marmot
75.7k486160
answered yesterday
marmot
75.7k486160
75.7k486160
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
yesterday
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
yesterday
1
I suggest using relative units such asemorex.
– egreg
yesterday
add a comment |
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
yesterday
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
yesterday
1
I suggest using relative units such asemorex.
– egreg
yesterday
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
yesterday
I'm not a fan of absolute length such as 1.2cm, for these cases.
– egreg
yesterday
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
yesterday
@egreg Morally I agree but do you really want to add an empty line instead?
– marmot
yesterday
1
1
I suggest using relative units such as
em or ex.– egreg
yesterday
I suggest using relative units such as
em or ex.– egreg
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
Using the xymatrix package you can see an example of little guide for this package: https://www.jmilne.org/not/Mxymatrix.pdf. I have created with this package, for your request, a simple code.
Picture with equilateral triangle.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix@C-=0.5cm{
A
ar@{->}[rr]^f ar@{->}[rd]_g & & B ar@{<-}[ld]^h\
&C&\
&&
}
end{document}
answered 13 hours ago
Sebastiano
8,29541754
1
It is not necessary to use@{->}since it is the standard arrow style.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow fromBtoCwith reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts fromC.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
2
I don't know the difference between@Cand@C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is@Ralso.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
Using the xymatrix package you can see an example of little guide for this package: https://www.jmilne.org/not/Mxymatrix.pdf. I have created with this package, for your request, a simple code.
Picture with equilateral triangle.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix@C-=0.5cm{
A
ar@{->}[rr]^f ar@{->}[rd]_g & & B ar@{<-}[ld]^h\
&C&\
&&
}
end{document}
answered 13 hours ago
Sebastiano
8,29541754
1
It is not necessary to use@{->}since it is the standard arrow style.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow fromBtoCwith reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts fromC.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
2
I don't know the difference between@Cand@C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is@Ralso.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Using the xymatrix package you can see an example of little guide for this package: https://www.jmilne.org/not/Mxymatrix.pdf. I have created with this package, for your request, a simple code.
Picture with equilateral triangle.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix@C-=0.5cm{
A
ar@{->}[rr]^f ar@{->}[rd]_g & & B ar@{<-}[ld]^h\
&C&\
&&
}
end{document}
answered 13 hours ago
Sebastiano
8,29541754
Using the xymatrix package you can see an example of little guide for this package: https://www.jmilne.org/not/Mxymatrix.pdf. I have created with this package, for your request, a simple code.
Picture with equilateral triangle.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix@C-=0.5cm{
A
ar@{->}[rr]^f ar@{->}[rd]_g & & B ar@{<-}[ld]^h\
&C&\
&&
}
end{document}
answered 13 hours ago
Sebastiano
8,29541754
edited 5 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
Sebastiano
8,29541754
answered 13 hours ago
Sebastiano
8,29541754
answered 13 hours ago
Sebastiano
8,29541754
8,29541754
1
It is not necessary to use@{->}since it is the standard arrow style.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow fromBtoCwith reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts fromC.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
2
I don't know the difference between@Cand@C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is@Ralso.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
1
It is not necessary to use@{->}since it is the standard arrow style.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow fromBtoCwith reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts fromC.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
2
I don't know the difference between@Cand@C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is@Ralso.
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
1
It is not necessary to use
@{->} since it is the standard arrow style.– Sigur
5 hours ago
It is not necessary to use
@{->} since it is the standard arrow style.– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
1
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
5 hours ago
Why empty 3rd line in the second example?
– Sigur
5 hours ago
1
1
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow from
B to C with reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts from C.– Sigur
5 hours ago
Although it is not wrong, it is not so natural to insert an arrow from
B to C with reversed tip at the starting point. It is easier to read the code if the arrow starts from C.– Sigur
5 hours ago
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use
@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
I've done a lot of rehearsals reading the guide. And to have an equilateral triangle with no errors in the compilation I have inserted the third empty line and I must necessarily use
@{->}. I have tried to do my best, I can assure you.– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
2
2
I don't know the difference between
@C and @C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is @R also.– Sigur
5 hours ago
I don't know the difference between
@C and @C-. Also, if you use column distance equal to half centimeter, you have to be sure that the diagonal arrows also have such length. There is @R also.– Sigur
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Manoel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Manoel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Manoel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Manoel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460349%2fmaking-diagrams%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Hint: you need 3 columns, 2 rows.
Cshould be in the 2nd row, 2nd column. Then, change the arrow directions accordingly.– Sigur
yesterday
1
Why not use
tikz-cd?– murray
yesterday